The first Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Legislative Council (LC) meeting of the academic year began on Sept. 11 by introducing all in attendance, with 16 out of 34 voting members on the Council present.

Speaker Jonathan Dong and Deputy Speaker Yasmin Beeai could not be present in person, so President Dymetri Taylor assumed the Speaker role. Over Zoom, Dong announced that he will be resigning as Speaker to become the LC’s Accountability Commissioner as of Sept. 15. His successor will be Acadia Knickerbocker.

After adopting the meeting’s agenda, the council moved on to an announcement by Commissaire aux Affaires francophones Maëla Dube, who discussed how the committee is dedicated to making meetings more accessible for French speakers. 

A representative from Agence Voltaic, the photography organization responsible for graduation and class photos at McGill, then gave a presentation. The representative pointed out that the studio takes appointments for graduation pictures year-round, yet most students book for November or March, leading to scheduling congestion. In order to encourage students to utilize the agency more efficiently, SSMU’s Communications staff created faculty-specific posters in collaboration with Agence Voltaic, explaining how to register for pictures.

The council next discussed two motions on the table, both of which were brought forth by Taylor. The Motion Regarding the Adoption of the Standing Rules for the 2025-2026 Legislative Council and General Assemblies (GA) sought to add more strict regulations for decorum and procedure to these meetings, such as requiring presented reports to include deadlines. Vice-President (VP) University Affairs Susan Aloudat questioned the motion’s language, noting that some rules were referred to with “should” and others “must,” which called into confusion which aspects of the motion were optional. 

“For example, the rules say we [must] close our laptops for guest speakers, but everyone’s laptop was open [during the Agence Voltaire presentation],” Aloudat said. “So, do we want to go back and review this?”

Taylor responded that SSMU should enforce all regulations listed to make governance events run smoother, and that since the motion had not yet been passed, the rules were not currently in effect. 

VP Clubs and Services Hamza Abu Alkhair motioned for a five-minute recess so council members could re-read the bill for questioning, after which Aloudat asked if the Accountability Commissioner would be enforcing the mandates listed in the motion. Dong responded that the members themselves will be responsible for submitting reports to the Parliamentarian when fellow members fail to follow the Accountability Plan. 

“This is something that is changing in the administration section of the new [Internal Regulations] of governance, [that] the executives will be reporting at every meeting,” Dong said.

Aloudat asked to amend the motion by removing the section prohibiting snapping, clapping, and knocking on desks at GAs, and the section prohibiting council members from having their laptops open. Taylor made these amendments, and the bill passed, with all except Abu Alkhair in favour.

The council then discussed the Motion Regarding the Legislative Council Committee Allocations. Council members decided which student committee they will stand on, as all are mandated to participate in at least one. No one volunteered to join the Board of Directors, leaving one seat still vacant.

Moment of the Meeting: Taylor concluded by introducing a notice of the Motion Regarding Edits to the Accountability Plan and Committee Terms of Reference, before ceding his time to the current Accountability Commissioner, Asma Khamis. The motion seeks to implement revised guidelines for how the Accountability Committee must process, communicate, and address complaints regarding SSMU operations, stipulating that it must present reports to the LC monthly. It also would require that the Committee present reports made against councillors immediately to increase transparency among members.

Soundbite: “[The Motion Regarding Edits] was mainly spurred by the fact that I don’t necessarily have the authority to enact accountability recommendations. I can only suggest and recommend. It’s up to the councils to determine a course of action.”—Asma Khamis, on the importance of revising the SSMU Accountability Plan.