Latest News

SSMU Council at Macdonald Campus. (Bea Britneff / McGill Tribune)
a, News, SSMU

First of SSMU’s “roaming Councils” held at Mac campus

On Oct. 11, the Students’ Society of McGill University’s (SSMU) Legislative Council convened for the third time this academic year. Although meetings are traditionally held in the Lev Bukhman room in the SSMU Building, this Council was hosted at McGill’s Macdonald Campus in Ste. Anne de Bellevue.

Thursday’s Council meeting was the first in a series of “roaming Councils” SSMU will host throughout the year. According to SSMU President Josh Redel, the goal of “roaming Councils” is to break away from operating out of a single building, and to reach out to other McGill student spaces.

“By going to different places, it allows councillors to gain perspective on other students at McGill, and [as a result], I hope that councillors are better able to make informed decisions,” Redel said. “It [also] allows other students to come watch and ask questions at Council in the comfort of a familiar environment.”

Redel explained that the purpose of travelling to Macdonald Campus for Thursday’s meeting was to help SSMU councillors understand the types of challenges the Macdonald Campus Students’ Society (MCSS) faces.

“I think we can also learn a lot from [MCSS],” Redel said. “In my experience … I found that smaller schools and faculties can often lend lessons to the bigger associations that often lose sight of the importance of getting to know students at a more personal level.”

According to Redel, future locations of “roaming Councils” will include residences, student areas in different faculties, and other venues across campus.

Council began with a presentation from SSMU Sustainability Coordinator David Gray-Donald, who spoke about the creation and history of sustainability initiatives and policies at McGill, as well as the university’s lack of a concrete sustainability strategy.

“[The former director of the McGill Office of Sustainability] didn’t think there was a need for a strategy,” Gray-Donald said. “We have all these [projects] going on as a policy, [and] there’s lot of money… but no strategy.”

Gray-Donald also elaborated on the Office of Sustainability’s Vision 2020 project, a year-long consultation process intended to lead to a sustainability strategy.

“Vision 2020 … started in February,” he explained. “[The Office has] been doing an analysis of where we are with sustainability at McGill. [We’ve created] five working groups [to address] five areas or dimensions of the university that we want to see sustainability happening in.”

Following Gray-Donald’s presentation, councillors voted on the only motion on the agenda for the evening. The motion concerned the increase of the SSMU “Safety Network” fee by $0.50 for all students at McGill’s downtown campus, with the increase going towards the McGill Student Emergency Response Team (M-SERT).

M-SERT is one of the 21 student-run, volunteer services offered through SSMU, and provides emergency first-aid response to McGill’s downtown campus and residences, as well as at various McGill events.

SSMU Vice-President Clubs and Services Allison Cooper explained to councillors that M-SERT is requesting an increase to SSMU’s base fee in order to offset its current operation costs, as well as the planned expansion of its coverage on campus and in Montreal.

The motion passed quickly, with 21 votes for, two against, and one abstention. M-SERT must now submit its question to a referendum—the date for which has not yet been decided. The motion read that the extra fee would be applied starting in the winter 2013 semester.

In response to Dean of Arts Christopher Manfredi’s report on last spring’s Open Forum on Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly, SSMU Vice-President University Affairs Haley Dinel announced that she will be involved in a group working on his recommendation to clarify the wording of the Code of Student Conduct.

“I am co-chairing a committee with Associate Provost (Policies, Procedures and Equity) Lydia White that is partly responsible for review of the Greenbook,” Dinel said. “[The] report will really help us figure out how to better change the Code of Student Conduct.”

SSMU Vice-President Finance and Operations Jean Paul Briggs also announced that, starting this week, the Operations Management Committee will be conducting a feasibility study of the student-run café alongside team members from the Sustainability Case Competition. Briggs’ executive report to Council stated that the goal is to have the study completed in four to six weeks.

a, Features

FEATURE: Who is John François?

Photos by Colin Vandenberg: Colin Vandenberg graduated from Praireview School of Photography, in Manitoba in 2003. He has travelled to distant corners of the world, photographing individuals and depicting their life stories. At some point along this journey, while traveling across Northern Manitoba, he met John François. 

Every morning, John François begins his day by turning on the radio, his most constant companion. The voices of the commentators, the music, and the advertisements fill the air of his cabin as he prepares for the day ahead. John François is good-humoured and light-hearted.

He lives in a rudimentary lodge that his father left him, and survives on fishing, hunting and occasionally, trading what he catches at the nearest town. His cabin is located on the periphery of the Pukatawagan Reserve in Manitoba, half an hour away by canoe across the Churchill River. He enjoys the isolation and peacefulness of this remote area of the country because, as he says, the solitude, the forest, and the land are “healing.” It was precisely the need to heal that drove John François to take refuge far away, distancing himself from his own community.

Click to see the full feature
Click to see the full feature

John François grew up in Pukatawagan, home of the Mathias Colomb Cree Nation (MCCN), located about 800 kilometres north of Winnipeg. Also called “Puk” by the locals, this small community of only 2,000 people has no road access —except for a few months in the winter—and is only accessible by a bi-weekly local train or small plane.

Getting off the train in Puk is like stepping into open wilderness. The natural scenery surrounding the remote northern reserve is breathtaking, with beautiful lakes, dense forests, and a bewildering view of the Churchill River, one of the last pristine bodies of freshwater in the country, which flows from the foothills of the Rocky Mountains (Kichiwatchya) and pours into Hudson Bay (Kichkamek). However, not everything is beautiful for this northern community. Life on the reserve itself can be quite another story.

Pukatawagan is often referred to by the surrounding communities as the “Dodge City of the North,” and is frequently cited as one of the region’s most problematic reserves. Afflicted by severe overcrowding, chronically underfunded by the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, and contaminated by a toxic spill that local authorities have yet to remedy, the reserve is riddled with neglect. Pukatawagan’s woes date back to the 1950’s, when Manitoba Hydro and Indian Affairs poorly installed a diesel generating station in the town centre that leaked thousands of litres of diesel into the ground.

When the spill was discovered in 1989, the school, nursing station, band hall, and about 100 houses were torn down. Ever since, the the social fabric of the reserve has suffered a severe strain.

Many impoverished residents of Pukatawagan have turned to crime and substance abuse, while the community and government continue to argue over who is responsible for cleaning up the mess.

Not too long ago, John François, like many others in Pukatawagan, struggled with alcohol and drug addiction. Last May, he decided to move away from his own community, take refuge in his father’s cabin, and live off the land. When asked why he decided to leave his community, he simply answered: “it keeps me off the booze. [Away from Puk] there are no hassles. No one’s giving you a hard time.”

Ironically, distancing himself from Pukatawagan has helped John François to get in touch with his own culture again, and regain his tranquility. Although he did not grow up a religious person, he now prays every day. In his cabin, sweet grass is always burning as an offering to the ancestors, as well as a gesture of gratitude for a day of good hunting. He drinks and smokes only occasionally, and hunts and fishes for a living in the same way that his ancestors did.

It could be that escaping to the timeless landscape of the northern forest and returning to the ways of the ancestors is the best way to heal.

Find more of Jon François, Pukatawagan, and more Colin Vandenberg photography at colinvandenberg.com.

 

Students vote in the SSMU General Assembly. (Sam Reynolds / McGill Tribune)
a, News, SSMU

SSMU fall General Assembly marked by low turnout

Despite efforts to make the General Assembly (GA) of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) on Oct. 15 more accessible to students, the assembly lost quorum after passing two motions.

The revamped GA showcased several new features, including the introduction of online ratification. Although motions still need to be passed by the assembly, they must now also be ratified through an online vote that represents at least 10 per cent of SSMU’s constituent. Voting on yesterday’s motions will be open for seven days, from Oct. 16 to Oct. 23. Results will be announced on the last day at 5 p.m.

The GA was also live-streamed, and featured a “mood watcher,” to whom students could send text messages anonymously if the debate made them feel uncomfortable, or if they thought the debate was moving in an unproductive direction.

The use of clickers to speed up voting was among the intended reforms pioneered by the SSMU executives. However, SSMU President Josh Redel said that the order for clickers fell through. SSMU will be looking into a text and mobile app-based audience engagement system for the next GA.

Despite the alterations, the GA lost quorum after voting on just two motions. However, Redel said he was pleased with the GA, and thought the mood watcher and use of social media were effective.

“[Low participation] might just be a reality of McGill,” Redel said. “I’m intrigued to know how much [improvements to the GA] could change that culture, [but] I think people enjoyed this, and hopefully that means that the next one will have more people.”

One student, who asked to remain anonymous, liked the idea of getting students involved through social media, but questioned the requirement of online ratification.

“After the first motion passed I think we all realized that… our participation doesn’t mean as much as it used to,” she said. “That’s disappointing.”

Redel said that ballots for online voting would be finalized in time for polls to open by noon  today. He added that there will be additional features to facilitate students’ understanding of the motions as they vote, such as videos of recorded debate, and hyperlinks in the ballot questions.

Motions

The two motions passed as binding resolutions concern the installation of a bouldering wall in the SSMU Building, and the renaming of the SSMU Breakout Room to the Madeleine Parent Room, in honour of a recently deceased McGill alumnus who advocated for gender equity.

Since the assembly lost quorum for all subsequent votes, the GA acted as a consultative forum for the remaining motions, which were therefore passed as non-binding resolutions to be discussed at SSMU Council.

One of these was a motion to renew SSMU’s mandate to support accessible education. Last year, the mandate meant that the society opposed the proposed provincial tuition increase of $1,625 over five years, which the newly elected Parti Québécois cancelled soon after their election to provincial parliament in September.

SSMU Vice-President External Robin Reid-Fraser pointed out that SSMU has supported this policy for a long time and that the role of this mandate this year will depend on the development of the student movement.

“The context of the student movement right now is quite different, because we have a change of government, [and] the tuition hike that students were striking about has been cancelled—at least for now,” Reid-Fraser said.

Some students, however, suggested that SSMU should not renew the mandate, pointing to the tension that arose surrounding the issue last year, as well as the Arts Undergraduate Society’s ultimate vote against joining the student strike.

“The last [time] that we had [a policy] about supporting accessible education, we had a previous Vice-President External spend several thousands of dollars of students’ money on a cause that they did not support, and that ultimately they voted down,” Harmon Moon, U3 history, said.

The greatest amount of debate came from a motion mandating SSMU’s opposition to Canadian military involvement in Iran.

“I want to point out the hypocrisy of this motion in condemning McGill or opposing any ties that the university has to weapons research, but not condemning Iran for engaging in the same kind of research,” Beni Fisch, one of the founders of the Moderate Political Action Committee (ModPAC), said.

“I understand that this is a very complicated issue,” Reid-Fraser,  one of the movers of the motion, said. “In general, this [motion] is very much opposing war because it is something that can affect many innocent people’s lives, not just on the Iranian side.”

Both motions were passed by the assembly and will be discussed at SSMU Council.

Additional motions passed by the assembly as a consultative forum resolved that SSMU oppose Plan Nord and further development of the Canadian oil sands, as well as lobby McGill to divest from companies engaged in activities concerning these issues.

a, News

Manfredi releases long-awaited report on the Open Forum

On Oct. 10, McGill Principal and Vice-Chancellor Heather Munroe-Blum announced the release of Dean of Arts Christopher Manfredi’s Report on the Open Forum on Free Expression and Peaceful Assembly. Manfredi’s concluding recommendations include the clarification of several clauses in the Code of Student Conduct, the revision of the provisional protocol, and a review of McGill Security’s training program.

Munroe-Blum mandated the series of open fora following Dean of Law Daniel Jutras’ report on the events of Nov. 10, 2011, when an occupation of the James Administration Building ended with riot police dispersing and pepper-spraying students on campus.

The open fora were intended to provide students, faculty, non-academic staff, and senior administration with an opportunity to engage in dialogue about campus issues, including freedom of assembly on campus, and the limits of this freedom. Four Open Forum sessions took place between March 1 and May 2 of this year.

Manfredi’s report on the Open Forum, which can be accessed online through the Open Forum blog, described the key issues that constituted the focus of the discussions—as well as the different opinions expressed regarding these issues.

Early in his report, Manfredi compared McGill’s policies, protections, and regulations to several Canadian and American universities and institutions. The points of comparison include student codes of conduct, freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, and the disruption of meetings.

Manfredi found that several of the institutions possess specific policies regarding freedom of speech and expression, and that the code of student conduct for each institution defines “prohibited behaviour” and establishes “disciplinary procedures for investigating … and sanctioning behaviour contrary to the Code.”

“Universities place limits on the rights to assembly and expression,” Manfredi concluded. “Assemblies and demonstrations must be ‘peaceful’ or ‘lawful’ to enjoy any protection at all.  Beyond this, even assemblies or demonstrations that fall within ordinary definitions of these qualifying terms are usually prohibited if they otherwise disrupt normal institutional activities.”

In his section on free expression, Manfredi stated that there was much debate about “expressive activities” such as protests, demonstrations, and occupations, and that many participants commented on the limited responsiveness of the McGill administration to “dissenting voices.”

With regards to peaceful assembly, Manfredi said that much of the discussion involved “the question of how much, where, and with what consequences disruptive activity can legitimately take place.” Manfredi noted that all participants in the Open Forum agreed that McGill should be a violence-free zone. However, other opinions ranged from the belief that peaceful assembly is a form of disruption—even in the absence of violence—and should not be tolerated, to the view that disruptions on campus should be allowed in all circumstances.

“The Open Forum discussions indicate that the university community accepts the necessity of limits, and that most recognize that the peaceful/non-peaceful line is more complicated than a simple distinction between violent and non-violent,” Manfredi concluded. “McGill’s Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures and its Charter of Student Rights currently inadequately define the limits to acceptable protest.”

Manfredi closed his report with three specific recommendations.

“The Code of Student Conduct should be clarified with regard to section 5, 6 and 10 of the Code, namely ‘disruption,’ ‘unauthorized entry and/or presence’ and ‘unauthorized or fraudulent use of university facilities, equipment or services,’ ” his first recommendation read.

The second recommendation dealt with the James Protocol, a provisional security protocol governing access to the James Administration building issued after students occupied the building’s 6th floor in February for six days. Manfredi recommended that the protocol be “revised or reconsidered with a view towards adopting a less restrictive approach to access and security.”

Manfredi’s final recommendation concerned McGill Security Services, which came under criticism last year for what some students at the forum called the increased “securitization of campus.” Manfredi emphasized the importance of training security personnel for disruptive situations.

“McGill Security should review their training program … in order to ensure accuracy and integrity in the case of incident reports and disciplinary proceedings,” he wrote.

In an email to the McGill community on Oct. 10, Munroe-Blum confirmed that she has accepted Manfredi’s three recommendations, and is ready to undertake the necessary measures needed to fulfill them.

“My colleagues and I are committed to addressing directly the matters identified in the report,” Munroe-Blum wrote. “In some cases work is already under way to deal with [these issues]; in others I’ve asked those responsible for substance and process to consider appropriate next steps and report back to me by November 15, 2012.”

Manfredi said he believes his second and third recommendations can be implemented relatively quickly without much additional consultation from the McGill community, however, he admitted that this might not be the case in regards to the Student Code of Conduct.

“Modifications to the Student Code of Conduct are undoubtedly more complicated,” Manfredi said in an email to the Tribune. “However, there is already a Code revision process under way.”

Josh Redel, president of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), said that the SSMU executive team is unable to comment on the report at this time.

In her email, Munroe-Blum stated she will reserve her comments on the report for the Senate meeting scheduled for Oct. 17, as well as the next meeting of the Board of Governors.

a, News, SSMU

Claire Stewart-Kanigan Elected Arts Representative to SSMU

Last Wednesday, Claire Stewart-Kanigan was voted in as representative of the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) to the Students’ Society of McGill University’s (SSMU) Legislative Council. Stewart-Kanigan won with 41.8 per cent of the total votes (975), beating out other candidates Ryan Mitton (32.2 per cent) and Harmon Moon (25.9 per cent).

SSMU Council typically has three representatives from the AUS, elected by arts undergraduate students each year. However, one of the representatives elected last March, Sean Phipps, resigned from the position.

Stewart-Kanigan is currently a joint-honours student studying political science and Canadian studies, and is co-president of McGill Students for the New Democratic Party. In her platform, Stewart-Kanigan stated three main focuses: helping students know where their tuition is going, ensuring that spending is directed by an ethical, students-first mandate, and prioritizing the establishment of student-run spaces.

“A central function of an arts rep is just that—to represent. So of course that is always going to be my overall priority,” Stewart-Kanigan said in her platform video.

“I’ve been a delegate and representative [for] numerous clubs in the past so I’m no stranger to giving up my own view in favour of the democratically elected conclusion,” she continued. “However, consent building through lots and lots of communication and outreach will be a big focus of mine.”

AUS President Devon LaBuik expressed confidence in Stewart-Kanigan’s ability to succeed in the position, even though he sees it as a challenging one.

“As Arts representative, I think the hardest thing is to make sure student voices are heard and not just yours,” LaBuik said. “This is a very difficult position to be in since you’re elected, but you have to keep in mind you have to get an aggregate of opinion, and that’s very tough.”

According to LaBuik, the main problem AUS faced in this election was low voter turnout. Only one of every ten eligible students voted, despite the fact that the online voting process takes no more than a few minutes. In a faculty with over 7,000 students, LaBuik said that engaging students can be difficult.

“What we did [that was new] this election was candidate videos and sending them out to students,” he said. “We’d probably have to do something [else] in the next election though. Our goal by the end of the year would be try to get 20 to 30 per cent of the students to vote. [It] will be tough, but we’re going to try our best to get people more involved.”

Marc Weinstein. (Simon Poitrimolt / McGill Tribune)
a, News

Campaign McGill leaders discuss fundraising strategies

Last Thursday, reporters from campus media met with Marc Weinstein, McGill’s Vice President (Development and Alumni Relations) and Derek Cassoff, Director of Communications (Development and Alumni Relations), to discuss McGill’s History in the Making campaign—the largest fundraising campaign in the university’s history. Launched publicly in 2007, the campaign has raised over $700 million for the university to date. According to Weinstein, roughly 65 per cent of this money comes from individuals, 20 per cent from family foundations, and 14 per cent from corporations.

Le Délit: How do you make the distinctions between [individuals] who are high paid executives of a certain company, versus a corporation?

Marc Weinstein: At the end of the day, it’s who writes the cheque … [for example] if an individual is sitting on a board, and he or she has that responsibility … but at the end of the day, if the cheque comes from the individual personally, it’s not a corporate gift. It’s an individual gift.

McGill Tribune: As far as the statistics for individual donors and corporate donors go, how does McGill compare to other universities in Canada or North America?

MW: McGill is extremely strong on raising philanthropic dollars from individuals compared to some of our sister universities across Canada, and especially in Quebec. Quebec’s mindset is a different sort of mindset when it comes to philanthropy—it’s highly corporate. We’re very strong on the individual … [but] our alumni pool is extremely diversified, and … 55 per cent of [our] alumni pool live in Quebec and 45 per cent of them live everywhere else … So it’s more challenging for us to keep them engaged, keep them interested, and keep them connected and value their education.

Derek Cassoff: In any typical year, 22-30 per cent of our alumni make a gift, whatever the size, so … our alumni tend to be much more likely to make a gift back to the university on an annual basis versus most of our counterparts in Canada. That allows us to have such a robust alumni donor base so we’re not as reliant on corporations to help us meet our philanthropic objectives.

McGill Daily: You said $230 million raised has been earmarked for student support. How much of that has been spent, and what does that translate to exactly? 

MW: Your question’s a tough one because some of the dollars we’ve raised are endowed dollars, that every year will spin off interest  … and then we’ll create the scholarships, or we’ll marry some of that money with other money we have, and we’ll provide it in more robust scholarships. … [Then] there are other donors who don’t want to do endowments—they want to do what we call ‘direct spent’ … Someone who doesn’t have $100,000 but still wants to help students, well we will tell him or her that [they] can give us a three year commitment for $5,000 and then in three years we’ll revisit … it’s a 50/50 split to be honest, but that money is being very well utilized.

MT: Are there any disadvantages to [McGill’s] donor-centric system?

MW: I think a very good, mature organization will want to be donor-centric because if you’re not donor-centric, [philanthropy] becomes all about just a transaction … It’s about building relationships, and then people will be very accommodating … and want to do it out of their own good will … So I think we need to be donor-centric, otherwise we won’t achieve where we want to go. Donor centricity starts off with listening to what the donor might or might not want to do, trying to make the connection with the priorities of the university, finding ways to somehow make sure that those parts fit nicely together, and then—beyond just accepting the ultimate so-called proverbial cheque— it’s what do we do after all that.

LD: I guess a lot of your job relies on the confidence of the donors. How did McGill Leaks affect the confidence of the donors in that respect?

DC: I think we did a pretty good job … of getting information out to our donor community right away. As soon as we heard about it we got information out to our donors, we followed up more specifically with any donors whose files may have been affected … I don’t think we lost a single penny of donations because of that—if anything we had a real appreciation from our donor alumni communities that we were so upfront with the information, and didn’t hold anything back.

—This interview has been condensed and edited by Erica Friesen.

Member of Parliament Marc Garneau spoke to students at McGill. (Michael Paolucci / McGill Tribune)
a, News

Liberal McGill invites Marc Garneau to speak to students

Last Friday, Liberal McGill hosted the Honourable Marc Garneau for a talk entitled “30 years after the Patriation: where are we now?” in the Lev Buhkman room of the Student Society of McGill University (SSMU) Building. Garneau is the current Member of Parliament (MP) for the riding of Westmount-Ville Marie in Montreal.

Garneau came to McGill as part of a larger movement entitled the Choose Your Canada tour. According to Liberal McGill President Eric Hendry, the tour aims to bring various Liberal caucus members to university campuses across the country from Oct. 9 to Nov. 4.

“The purpose of this event is to introduce McGill students to the MP for the riding that McGill is in, Westmount—Ville Marie,” Hendry said. “It’s a great opportunity for students to hear a parliamentarian talk about a subject that many [people] are interested in.”

Hendry also noted that Marc Garneau has spoken at McGill before, and was brought back due to his vast field of experience, and impressive knowledge on many different subjects.

“Last time he was here was two years ago,” Hendry said. “It’s been a while, and he’s a great speaker to bring to … campus as much as we can. He’s had so much experience in so many walks of life.”

Garneau’s talk on Friday covered federalism and Quebec’s place in Canada since the 1981 Patriation—when the Constitution was made amendable only by Canada, without the British Parliament playing a role. While Quebec did not approve of these constitutional changes, Garneau shared his view that the overall effect of the Patriation was positive for all of Canada.

“Thirty years later … whether or not it was endorsed by the government of Quebec, Quebec avails itself of the constitution, it avails itself of the charter, the amending formula, and the notwithstanding clause in order to achieve its political objectives,” Garneau said. “In my opinion, the results were very positive for Canadians and for Quebeckers.”

(Michael Paolucci / McGill Tribune)
(Michael Paolucci / McGill Tribune)

Garneau also explained that Canada is not the only federation in which constitutional changes have not been approved by the entire country, citing Bavaria in Germany as another example.

“Although not an ideal situation, I think we all have to admit that Germany [and] Canada still manage to function very well sometimes,” he said.

Following his talk, Garneau hosted a question and answer period. Audience members’ questions covered a variety of topics, ranging from the Patriation itself, to Garneau’s potential leadership candidacy, and to Bill C-420—a bill that Garneau himself put forward, and which would establish the Office of the Commissioner for Children and Young Persons in Canada.

Students who attended the event offered positive and enthusiastic feedback.

“I wasn’t aware that he was such an incredible speaker and it was great to see him in his element like that,” Laura Jarecsni, U0 education, said. “It was interesting to hear him talk about his potential Liberal leadership candidacy. I was very excited by that.”

The event also fits into Liberal McGill’s goal to inform students about the upcoming Liberal Party leadership elections, and to encourage them to get involved with the actions of the Liberal Party.

“We’re … hoping to bring in as many leadership candidates to McGill as possible,” Hendry said. “The leadership election is going to be the focus of our speaking events throughout the year.”

a, News

Mary Gordon on the importance of fostering empathy

As part of Desautels’ Homecoming festivities last Friday, McGill’s Social Economy Initiative (SEI) hosted a presentation by social entrepreneur Mary Gordon in the Bronfman Building. Gordon spoke to the audience about Roots of Empathy, the classroom program she founded 17 years ago to help address aggression and bullying, and to help increase empathy among elementary school children.

Gordon discussed how teaching children to be “emotionally literate” will improve society in future generations. Emotional literacy, she explained, requires an individual to be able to identify his or her own feelings, to identify those feelings in other people, and then to discuss those feelings with others.

“Let me promise you, we are an emotionally illiterate society,” Gordon said. “We have a steady uptake of emotional ineptitude in society.”

Roots of Empathy, as the program name suggests, focuses on building empathy in young children to increase emotional literacy. The program aims to foster the capacity for caring by working with babies. The children learn to identify how the baby feels in given situations—for instance, if a toy is taken away.

“We have the opportunity to say [to the children], ‘when was a time you felt like the baby, when you were crying inside?’ And I promise you there are many broken hearts in every classroom,” Gordon said.

Roots of Empathy began as a small program in Toronto in 1996, serving 150 children. It is now in every province in Canada, and has a reach of over 450,000 students across the country. The program has also expanded into the United States, Europe, and New Zealand.

According to Anita Nowak, SEI integrating director and current instructor of a new McGill course entitled “Introduction to Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation,” Gordon was chosen as a Homecoming speaker for a number of reasons, but Nowak said that the success of Roots of Empathy probably played a large factor in the final decision.

“I think one of the things that is very important in the non-profit sector, and the social enterprise and entrepreneurial endeavors, is that they actually show impact,” Nowak said. “[It’s important] that it’s not just a promise, but that they actually can deliver on the mission that they are hoping to accomplish.”

Nowak also explained how SEI wanted to take advantage of the Homecoming weekend to inform alumni of what SEI is doing, and how they can help. The SEI is a relatively new initiative at McGill that began this past January, and will publicly launch in the spring of 2013. It hopes to integrate social entrepreneurship and social innovation into the teaching and research that occurs in the Desautels Faculty of Management.

A mixture of students and alumni attended Friday’s talk. Many students said they attended because they are currently in Nowak’s Introduction to Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation course.

Michael Hibberd, U3 general management, is in Nowak’s class and was impressed by Gordon’s presentation.

“I really did think it was a phenomenal talk,” Hibberd said. “It was incredibly inspiring. I found a lot of things in this talk that I had been thinking about for a long time and looking for, but never found … It was really refreshing.”

Kristen Foster, U2 international management, is also in Nowak’s class and agreed with Hibberd.

“I think [Gordon] does something that our society is starting to do, but [is taking] way too long to do, and that is to get to the root of problems, rather than trying to fix it afterwards,” Foster said. “She is doing it to such [an] extent that it is amazing and inspiring.”

a, News

What happened this week in Canada?

Protesters block construction in Charlottetown, PEI

On Oct. 10, protesters halted construction on the realignment of the Trans-Canada Highway near Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island (PEI).  According to PEI’s transportation department, the section of the highway in question is currently unsafe because of its sharp curves and steep hills.

This realignment has sparked an outcry from those who oppose the planned destruction of farmland, recreational areas, and a section of old-growth hemlock forest. Despite fencing put up to deter protesters, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police halted construction because a few protesters came close enough to the heavy machinery for authorities to deem further operation unsafe.

Those at the protest included some members of PEI’s Green Party were also present, including interim leader Darcie Lanthier, and incoming leader Peter Bevan-Baker. Bevan-Baker and several other protesters were charged with trespassing; Lanthier says she expects to be charged with resisting arrest and mischief.

Although construction on the site has since resumed, protesters say they will continue to stage demonstrations to prevent the highway realignment.

Toyota recalls 240,000 vehicles in Canada

Toyota Motor Company announced the largest recall in the company’s history on Oct. 10. The recall affects over seven million vehicles worldwide—240,000 of which are in Canada—and has been initiated due to a problem involving the master window switch on the driver’s side of vehicles.

A problem in the production of the vehicles resulted in poorly greased switches, causing the switch to feel sticky during use. Should car owners lubricate the switch in hopes of fixing this problem, the switch assembly could melt, leading to a fire.

Customers in the U.S. have reported more than 200 problems due to this issue despite claims by Toyota spokespeople that the risk is minimal.  According to the company, the inspection and repair process for affected vehicles will only take around an hour.

This announcement is the latest in a series of recalls by Toyota in the last few years, including one three years ago that involved up to 12 million vehicles affected by issues with acceleration. Company officials say that the recently increased number of recalls is a result of Toyota’s ambitious growth goals.

Conservative government criticized for spending on advertisements

The Conservative government has recently come under scrutiny by NGOs and NDP critics regarding their spending on advertisements. While government programs across the nation have had their funding cut, the Tories have already approved $64 million worth of advertising for the 2012-2013 year, although the total amount will only be available to the public after all the invoices are processed.

Advertisement campaigns on the government’s “Economic Action Plan” website include those for “better jobs,” and “responsible resource development.” Government departments, such as the Department of Finance, have justified this expenditure by arguing that raising awareness for initiatives is an important step in unifying the nation.

In the meantime, the Conservative government has discontinued programs such as the Experimental Lakes Area, and has made drastic cuts to the budgets of other programs—such as the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy—in order to save money.

BC Health Minister apologizes for delayed surgery time

Last week, British Columbia’s Health Minister Margaret McDiarmid issued an apology to an Okanagan teenage boy, whose delayed surgery was a factor to his paralysis from the waist downward.

Walid Khalfallah was 13 years old when he was diagnosed with kyphosis—a condition that involves an over-curvature of the upper back. Because of the severity of the case, Khalfallah’s doctor insisted that the boy seek immediate attention, but delays pushed the date of surgery 27 months behind schedule.

By the time Khalfallah’s parents sought medical help in Washington, rather than delay the surgery further, his condition had worsened, leaving him paraplegic, following the operation.

In her apology, McDiarmid spoke of the fluctuating waitlist, and the current process of improving B.C.’s health care system. McDiarmid added that the number of spinal surgeries performed at the BC’s Children’s Hospital has doubled since 2009.

Montrealers protest behaviour By Stephanie Trudeau

Last Friday night, over two hundred protestors took to the streets of downtown Montreal, calling for an end to police violence, and the dismissal of Montreal police officer, Constable Stefanie Trudeau.

This past spring, Trudeau—more commonly known by her badge number, “No. 728”— was caught on tape last spring using pepper spray on peaceful protesters. On Oct. 2, Trudeau was also recorded using coarse language and aggressive behaviour after seeing someone in public with an empty beer bottle.

The protest, which was organized through Facebook, began at 9:15 p.m. at Place Émile-Gamelin. Protestors—some of whom were masked—made their way to Ste. Catherine’s street, chanting and calling for passersby to join them. Riot police monitored the situation throughout the night. At 10:00 p.m. the protest was declared illegal, and by 11:00 p.m. the protesters had dispersed.

According to CTV News, Trudeau has been suspended, and is currently under a disciplinary investigation. The police ethics commission has also reprimanded Trudeau for the pepper spray incident.

Chávez was reelected with 54.42 per cent of the vote. (outraspalavras.com)
a, News

Hugo Chávez wins third presidential term in Venezuela

Hugo Chávez Frías will remain president of Venezuela for the next six years, following his defeat of moderate challenger Henrique Capriles Rodonski in the country’s presidential elections on Oct. 9.

According to Tibisay Lucena, president of the National Electoral Council, Chávez obtained 54.42 per cent of the vote while his opponent gained 44.9 per cent. Out of nearly 19 million registered voters, 81 per cent cast ballots in this election.

Shortly after his victory at midnight, Chávez led his supporters outside the presidential palace in singing the national anthem. The crowd responded by chanting “Hey-Ho, Chávez won’t go.” Chávez has been the president of Venezuela for the past 14 years.

During his time in office, Chávez’s government has reached out to Venezuela’s impoverished population through anti-poverty programs such as free educational services and health clinics, as well as low-income housing. His government, however, has also seen an increase in crime rates, restrictions on the media, and state control of the oil industry.

Although Chávez was elected, the process illuminated Venezuela’s political and structural divisions between those who support Chávez’s brand of socialism, and those who desire free-market solutions to economic problems.

Manuel Balán, an associate professor in the department of political science specializing in political corruption and comparative politics, described the foundation of Chávez’s political objectives. Balán explained that Chávez does not promote economic development through the creation of infrastructure and public institutions. Instead, Chávez understands economic development in terms of providing people with basic resources.

“Chávez lacks a clear economic model,” Balán said. “What the masses are looking for is food on the table. What Chávez does is that he provides the poor just enough so that they can say that the state is fulfilling its promises. Is that buying their vote or is that fulfilling their needs? It is a difficult question to answer.”

Those who criticize Chávez, however, argue that the country is experiencing slow economic growth, high inflation, and food shortages. Jonathan Benitez, U2 engineering and a Venezuelan student at McGill, said Chávez’s reelection could have disadvantages.

“The possible implications of a third term might encompass destruction of the economy, less democracy, more crime, [and the] middle class leaving the country,” Benitez said.

To build support for the opposition, moderate politician Capriles argued during his campaign that he would not eliminate any of Chávez’s social programs, but would build upon them instead. Balán, however, explained that not all of Capriles’ supporters are as moderately-leaning as Capriles himself.

“His supporters had been very well known for not following [his] kind of moderate political approach,” Balán said. “They are the [right-wing] opposition of the past, the people [that] created the conditions from which Chávez emerged.”

Chávez’s health concerns are also a potential barrier to his ability to govern Venezuela. Chávez was diagnosed with abdominal cancer in 2011, and has since undergone multiple surgeries and chemotherapy treatments to treat his disease.

In a few weeks, however, Venezuela will have local elections, in which opponents of Chávez will have another opportunity to gain public support.

Luis Pombo, a Venezuelan U1 engineering student, said he voted in the election from Montreal.

“Prior to voting, I was feeling extremely patriotic, even playing the full national anthem as I was getting ready to go to the voting center,” Pombo said. “I felt happy to finally be taking part in the act of voting.”

 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue