Latest News

Opinion

There are kirpans, and there are kirpans

Should daggers be allowed in the national assembly, Quebec’s legislative body? That’s the gross oversimplification that Quebec politicians are debating in the latest conflict between Quebec and religious minorities over the issue of religious accommodation.

Earlier this week, four Sikhs carrying kirpans—small symbolic daggers carried by most Sikh men—were denied entrance to Quebec’s national assembly. The Parti Quebecois are the primary movers behind the decision, and now their federal party relatives, the Bloc Quebecois are petitioning to have the kirpan banned in Parliament as well.

At first glance, the solution seems obvious. Religious or not, weapons shouldn’t be permitted in legislative bodies. No one would expect to be allowed to carry a hunting knife into Parliament. But then again, the physical threat represented by the kirpan isn’t entirely clear. One editorialist called the government silly and reactionary, claiming that a kirpan can’t even cut through a banana. Another pointed out that a Sikh man was stabbed in Brampton, Ontario, last spring with a kirpan wielded by another Sikh. Kirpans, which range in size and sharpness, are allowed in schools, so long as they are underneath clothing and sewn inside their sheaths, and permitted on VIA Rail trains, but not on airplanes. Consider also that a Liberal MP from Toronto has been wearing a kirpan in the House of Commons for years now.

Clearly, making a decision based on any one of the ad hoc precedents for the kirpan isn’t an option, and an absolutist list of religious items that could be considered security threats—in somewhat far-fetched, “what if” scenarios—is not the solution. For example, the four Sikh men were testifying regarding Bill 94, which would ban the niqab, a veil worn by some Muslim women, from public places in Quebec for fear that anyone could be concealing their identity under it.  The government of Quebec isn’t trying to toe the faint, squiggly line between security and accommodation. They have made it clear that they are choosing security and letting the accusations of intolerance fly as they may.

Initially, my reaction is to agree with the ban on kirpans. But given the minimal risk it poses and the number of public places where it’s currently permitted (and recurrent tendencies toward xenophobia within Quebec nationalism), a small dull kirpan does not pose much of a security risk to the national assembly. As the Bloc Quebecois secularism critic put it, “Multiculturalism is not a Quebec value. It may be a Canadian one but it is not a Quebec one.” In regards to the kirpan and the niqab, Quebec is wrong to put that statement into practice. At the same time, we must recognize that some kirpans are clearly dangerous weapons (do a quick internet search if you don’t believe me). Small, dull kirpans should be permitted in public places, including Parliament, where at least one MP has been permitted to wear one for years—while kirpans of the hunting knife variety definitely should not.

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Rewriting the classics

Perhaps inspired by the trials of his conflicted protagonist, director Max Zidel ambitiously attacks Aeschylus’ three-part tragedy in The Oresteia Rewritten, now on at Players’ Theatre. The result of his efforts: a powerful and unexpectedly fast-paced reproduction full of sound and fury.

From early on in the play it is clear that trying to accurately trace a detailed plot, let alone three, from this feverish production is a fool’s errand. As a result. the world we enter in the third-floor orifice of the Shatner Building is constantly shifting, and full of in-your-face conflict.

As the main character, Orestes, wrestles with classic tragedian struggles (murdered parents, political allegiances, and arduous journeys), the audience is beckoned away from the epic hero’s journey and invited to participate in the mental process of his struggle. As the chorus chants eerily in unison, we are fully transported to the world of this disturbed psyche.

Zidel and musical director James Campbell use the classical palette through powerful imagery and pulsating musical chorus-to-character back-and-forth to explore how we wrestle with ourselves and our choices. Carrying the burden of these choices, Orestes (David Armstrong) is able to capture and hold the audience’s attention because he is so completely self-possessed on stage. He reacts spontaneously and subtly to the familial conflict surrounding him and eventually to the conflicting voices of “The Furies” in his maddened mind.

The bloody encounters between Orestes’s parents, King Agamemnon and his wife Clytemnestra, are conveyed solidly by Cam Oram and Jamie Munro, respectively. As their disputes heat up in the first act, Munro takes control of her part with a rigid and unforgiving physicality. Hatef Mottaghi plays a pensive and cleverly probing Menelaus, Agamemnon’s brother and advisor, who at times steals the stage from his sibling.

When the re-written parts of the dialogue get a little bit too Disney, with lines like, “I don’t know what love means anymore,” the viewer can still rely on the frantic and spontaneous actions of the Chorus — functioning as a “conscience posse” for Orestes—to bring us back to the lively inner conflict around which the play revolves. Notable among the chorus is Emily Murphy, who is able to deliver gestures that border hauntingly on epileptic.   

Feathers, unkempt hair, and dark, other-worldly makeup give the chorus a folklore quality that helps the show break away from its classical origins and into more mythical, timeless territory. Driving many scenes into this territory is the prophesying Oracle played by Lerato Islam. Islam is stunning in a shimmering dress and vibrant shawl, and commands the stage with a visceral voice.

The set functions well in stationary scenes, but in a show that is meant to transport us to radically different environments, it sometimes has a cumbersome quality. Similarly, the lighting in the small theatre works very well at casting powerful shadows when the action is focused, but struggles to define the more mobile scenes. One example of this occurs when Orestes and his sister Electra (played youthfully and convincingly by Annie MacKay) revisit their convoluted past, their father’s grave symbolically lit from above at centre stage.When the production comes together in all its elements, which it does brilliantly and miraculously at times, we can see the heavy backdrop of the set as a sort of mythic and powerful stomping ground.

The Oresteia Rewritten grapples with the daunting challenges of combining ancient and modern dialogue, staging an amphitheatre-sized epic in a small black box theatre and, most obviously, condensing three plays into one that runs for an hour and a half long. The product is very satisfying. While Zidel may not have been looking to create a faithful representation of the tragic trilogy, he clearly had good reasons for grounding his hyper-creative visions in the work of the Greeks. Bring a friend and a flask, because it may be the only chance you’ve got hear the word “fuck” belted out of the ancient house of Atreus.

The Oresteia Rewritten runs at Player’s Theatre January 26-29.

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Before there were hipsters…

Holly Stewart

Though it usually operates on a smaller scale, this week Opera McGill will debut a big-budget, big-cast version of what is arguably the world’s biggest-name opera: Giacomo Puccini’s La Bohème.

“It’s the world’s favourite opera, in some way,” says Patrick Hansen, the director of McGill’s Opera Studies program. “A lot of people would probably say it’s numero uno.”

Hansen’s relationship with the opera goes back to the beginning of his 30-year career, in which he has performed or viewed a scene or an entire production of the performance.

First performed in 1896, La Bohème is about bohemians in love in 1830s Paris. Part of the reason for its enduring popularity is its ability to speak to young people.

“The thing that really makes Bohème powerful is that it’s a story about young people: artists, musicians, painters, philosophers—you know, students,” Hansen says. “We could have [set] this in the McGill Ghetto. It would have been easy.”

Unlike most operas, La Bohème has made a number of leaps from the opera house into popular culture. Australian director Baz Luhrmann started his career with an updated production of it, and later reused parts of the sets in his Moulin Rouge! The music appeared in the 1987 romantic comedy Moonstruck, and the Broadway musical Rent is based on the story, even borrowing the names of the characters.

Philippe Sly, who will play Marcello, one of the two male leads, on January 26 and 29, said that he found a lot of common ground with his character.

“[Co-star Elias Berberian] and I decided we’re just going to play ourselves, have a good time on stage, and we know that will resonate quite profoundly,” he said.

In March, Sly will go to New York to compete with a few dozen other singers (selected from a pool of around 2,000) at the Metropolitan Opera House’s National Council Auditions contest.  

Though Hansen has done Bohème for 30 years, this particular production has some new dimensions. Most significantly, the orchestra will be on the stage as opposed to in the pit, which is too small for a full ensemble. Although that might sound trivial, it means big changes for the show’s basic dynamics.

“Everything about the production is about how to technically make that happen,” said Hansen.

The production will therefore feature some significant technical changes, the most important being that performers will interact with the conductor via screens stage right, stage left, and in front of the stage. “La Bohème via Skype, in a weird way,” Hansen said.

Though the scheme creates some challenges for the singers and musicians, in other senses Hansen said that it was the “easiest production [he] had ever directed,” because the cast is talented and because the script is easy to stage.

“The thing that’s great about Bohème is that there’s not a wasted moment. It’s so compact and so pithy,” he said.  “It’s almost made for ADHD folks … There’s not a moment where you sit there and go ‘Gosh, this has been going on for a while,’ because there’s always a new character, there’s always something happening.”

When asked for a final word on his show, Hansen did not hide his confidence.

“I can’t imagine a better production being done,” he said. “I just think that this is simply not to be missed. If [students] ever have thought for a moment, ‘I’m at university, I really ought to be taking in an opera for once in my life,’ they would come and actually be surprised at how amazing it is, how ingenious it is, and they might get hooked on it.”

La Bohème runs Jan. 26, 28, 29, 30, 7:30 p.m. at Pollack Hall.  Tickets are $22. 

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

In Goethe-inspired opera, a fatal attraction

Opera of Montreal

Shortly after the curtain rises on Opera of Montreal’s production of Werther, a young boy wheels a bicycle across the stage, laughing and carousing with his friends. The bicycle remains onstage through the first act, occasionally pedaled by the boy but mostly left in a corner, untouched and overturned. Along comes Werther, the melancholic protagonist, just in from the fields, walking as if in a daze and singing of his love for nature. He leans in to smell a bouquet of flowers on the kitchen table. He admires the sound of the children, now off-stage, singing Christmas carols in July. Almost absent-mindedly, he approaches the bicycle and spins the back wheel, watching it turn round and round.            One cannot help but wonder what the Opera of Montreal means with this bicycle. Werther, a French opera written in 1887 by Jules Massenet, is based on a 1774 novel by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Bikes were not yet invented in the era of the writer and not yet popular in that of the composer; one wonders, then, about the meaning of this innovation and what it tells us about the timeless Werther story.

In Geothe’s novel, Werther, a prototypically sensitive and passionate young poet, meets and falls helplessly in love with Charlotte, who is engaged to Albert. The wedding throws Werther into a fierce, suicidal depression. When he realizes Charlotte will never leave Albert, he borrows the latter’s pistols and shoots himself in the stomach. Charlotte rushes to the scene and holds Werther while he dies.

The opera based on this story could quite possibly have been based not on the novel at all but rather on a summary of the same brevity as the one above. It covers the rough plot outline but doesn’t even attempt to depict the more interesting aspects of Goethe’s novel. It eschews the epistolary form of the novel (letters from Werther to his friend Wilhelm) for a more direct dramatic approach, and the audience loses the relatively unmediated access that the letters give us to the state of the protagonist’s mind.

Werther as a musical composition, however, provides an additional outlet for expression that gives the story a direct emotional appeal.  Although originally written for a tenor, Massenet reworked the composition in 1902 to accommodate a baritone he wanted to sing the part of Werther. Opera of Montreal chose to produce this rarer version, believing correctly that the baritone (Phillip Addis) would enrich the depth of Werther’s passion and fall.

A review of a 1986 performance of Werther by the New York City Opera, stated, “The only way to approach Werther is to assume that the 20th century never happened. There is almost no way that the psychological, religious, and social dilemmas that faced Goethe’s sorrowful young hero in the 18th century can be translated into modern terms.” Globalization, for instance, among other social and cultural changes, has often been described as destroying our sense of living within horizons: we recognize those horizons as arbitrary and therefore as meaningless. We couldn’t possibly experience or empathize with Werther’s rhapsodic views about Charlotte and the world.

The bicycle, then, as emblematic of the Opera’s decision to situate the story of Werther in the 20th century (called “gratuitous” by the Gazette), can be seen as a response to the suggestion that we moderns are incapable of either appreciating or replicating such commitments. The children ride bicycles, the women wear flapper-like dresses, Charlotte uses a telephone to call for help after Werther’s suicide: all these remind the audience that what Werther suffered through were not merely pre-modern histrionics but rather quintessentially human experiences.

Pessimists though we often are, we too create horizons for ourselves, various sublime boundaries within which we have no choice but to live our everyday lives. Werther, captivated by the spinning wheel of the bicycle, is no different than one of us, stopping at the corner of Pine and Park and admiring the snowy cliffs of Mount Royal. When Werther sings to Charlotte, “These eyes, my horizon, these sweet eyes,” we know what he’s talking about. The poetry stirs us because we intuitively know what it means.

Werther is playing at Salle Wilfrid-Pelletier, Place des Arts Jan. 26, 29, 31, and Feb. 3. For more information, visit operademontreal.com.

Arts & Entertainment, Music

Sparkle and glitter for Diamond Rings

aux.tv

This week, Toronto-based performer Diamond Rings will open for Scandinavian dance-pop giant Robyn as part of a multi-city North American tour that promises to be anything but boring. Diamond Rings, also known as John O’Regan, has become famous in recent months for his outlandish costumes, energetic performances, and infectious dance beats. Those who are familiar with O’Regan from his days as the lead vocalist for Toronto band the D’Urbervilles may be surprised by his penchant for glitter and body paint. O’Regan says, however, that this is a natural transformation.

“I consider myself more of a performer than a musician,” O’Regan says. “I’m following in a long line of performers, trying to do what my favourite musicians have done before me.” Included in this tradition are bands like Kraftwerk and Devo and pop icons like Janet Jackson, who are well-known for their public images and live performances. “It’s like a never-ending feedback loop,” he says. “To separate [the image and the music] is pointless; it all feeds into the same thing.”

While O’Regan’s loud and colourful style has played a significant role in the rising popularity of Diamond Rings, he hasn’t stopped striving for more. “I’m learning a lot about making electronic music, and how to write a good song,” he says. “It’s a lot easier to make something a challenge to listen to, [but] to try to do something that’s really honest …  it’s a brave thing to do.”

The character and public image of Diamond Rings have been integral to O’Regan’s popularity as a solo artist, but it can sometimes be a tricky balance offstage. “There are so many mundane aspects of being a career musician,” he says. “It’s a lot of work, and there are so many things that require a lot of time and energy. I wish I could wear makeup all the time!”

Incorporating an image into musical performance also requires walking a fine line between artistic integrity and pleasing the audience. “I wasn’t really thinking about the audience before,” he says. “But ultimately it’s hard to pretend there aren’t people out there who are anticipating and judging what I do next.” Dealing with a captivated audience has made O’Regan more introspective about the messages in his songs. “Each song is a learning experience,” he says. “As soon as you try to write for someone other than yourself, things get complicated … but if I hold true to that spirit of making music I like, I can only hope that that will translate [to the audience].”

After more than five years of touring and recording with the D’Urbervilles—and becoming an established member of the Canadian independent music scene in the process—O’Regan is determined to keep things exciting, both for himself and his fans.

“I’m growing as a musician, which is a really fun challenge,” he says. “There’s no formula, and no clear-cut way to do it … Maybe I can even make something my mom will like.”

 Going solo hasn’t been an easy adjustment for O’Regan. “I’m still getting used to it,” he says. “Performing solo is radically different, but there’s a thrill of stepping off a cliff on your own, with no one to look over to at any point in the show. It’s just about me and the fans, which is challenging, but that’s why I like it.”

Despite its challenges, being on his own has allowed O’Regan to experiment with pop-based performance tactics, including choreographed dance routines and 80s-inspired costumes. “I’ve been doing a bunch of new stuff [for this tour],” he says. “New outfits, new makeup, new dance routines … I’m trying to keep things interesting for myself. I’m just trying to create my own world, and the live show is the best place to do that.”   

Diamond Rings opens for Robyn at Metropolis on January 27.

Opinion

The CBSC f#&s up

The Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC)—a non-governmental organization committed to applying the standards of Canadian broadcasting to its members, made up of over 700 broadcasters—has recently ruled that the 1985 Dire Straits song “Money for Nothing” must be edited for radio play. The problem? The word “faggot,” which is used three times, spurred a complaint from a listener in St. John’s about the song’s alleged homophobic message. Upon review, the CBSC decided that the song violated clauses of both the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) Code of Ethics and the Equitable Portrayal Code. While their decision isn’t binding on non-members, members can now only play an edited version of the song.  

The ruling has ignited a debate over censorship in Canada, with many media outlets, as well as the Canada Radio and Television Council (CRTC)—which acts as an appellate body for complaints against CBSC rulings—calling for the CBSC to reconsider their decision. The outcry against the ruling seems to represent a larger concern over retroactive censorship, especially as a result of misinterpretation.

As many journalists have been quick to point out, the use of “faggot” in “Money for Nothing” is ironic—as a counterattack against a boorish MTV viewer. The offending lines, “See the little faggot with the earring and the makeup/ Yeah buddy that’s his own hair/ That little faggot got his own jet airplane/ That little faggot he’s a millionaire,” mock his point of view and choice of words; it’s as if the singer is making air quotes around the word when he says it back to the man who called musicians like him a faggot.

While there is no question that the word is offensive, the context in which it is used needs to be taken into account. The singer’s intent is not irrelevant. Strangely, the most popular songs on the radio at any given time are likely to be far more provocative; in fact, they often try to be. What is worse—material that aims to be provocative, but slides under the radar of the CBSC, or material that is upfront yet unintentionally provocative?

Let’s look at some of the songs topping the charts right now. Drake’s opening lines in Rihanna’s “What’s My Name?” are “I heard you good with them soft lips/ Yeah you know word of mouth/ The square root of 69 is eight something.” These could violate the code’s stance against “unduly sexually explicit material.” What about Enrique Iglesias’s “Tonight (I’m Lovin’ You)?” It contains the lines, “Now rock your body/ Damn I like the way that you move/ So give it to me/ Cause I already know what you wanna do” and “Tonight I’m gonna do/ Everything that I want with you.” Do these lines not violate the Ethics Code’s stance against sex-role stereotyping? The point is, anyone can run amok with these codes if they try hard enough (or in this case, not very hard at all).

To be clear, I don’t think any of these songs should be subject to a radio edit (the Billboard Hot 100 might have been reduced to the Billboard Hot 10 if I kept going). If I had my way, music wouldn’t be subject to censorship before it hit the airwaves. Kids are going to learn swear words sooner or later, be it from movies, the schoolyard, or that time their mom stubbed their toe; it’s the job of a parent to make sure that kids understand certain words are inappropriate to use at a young age. If you’re an adult and you’re offended by swearing in music, feel free to wrap your Snuggie around your head when the radio is on; the world neither can nor should always cater to your preferences, especially on a divisive issue like this. As for the theme of a song, it’s important to remember that truly offensive material censors itself—in short, it gets silenced because nobody wants to hear it. However, none of this seems to matter to the CBSC, who have proven that they place content over context in what can only nicely be called a hypersensitive f#@k-up.

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Song and dance for the tortured soul

Alice Walker

What do you do when you’re trapped in a Buenos Aires prison? You fantasize about movie stars, of course.

That, at least, is how Molina—a gay window-dresser in prison for “corrupting a minor”—has gotten through his darkest hours. When Valentin, a hunky Marxist revolutionary accused of attempting to overthrow the government, becomes Molina’s new cellmate, the self-described “resident queen” is forced to choose between cooperating with the prison’s wardens to obtain his freedom, and risking his own life to save the man he soon grows to love.

This slightly twisted plotline belongs to The Kiss of The Spider Woman, the latest musical production to come from the Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society. Directed by Renée Hodgins, this play is anything but your average musical. The prison is run by cruel vixens, the innocent are the ones incarcerated, and the love story takes place between two men—one of whom is not homosexual.

Initially, Valentin (Ryan Peters) seems more bothered by Molina’s flamboyancy than by his own imprisonment. While he wants to be left alone to read Marx in bed and dream about his beloved Marta, Molina (Dane Stewart) spends his day re-enacting scenes from movies featuring his favourite movie star, Aurora (Zara Jestadt). Unlike Valentin, who exists in the world of cold, harsh facts, Molina escapes dreary prison life by inhabiting a dream world in which the beautiful Aurora sings and dances his troubles away. The one role Aurora plays that Molina is not tempted by, however, is that of the Spider Woman, who murders her victims with one fatal kiss.

Juxtaposed with scenes of lacklustre prison life are outbursts of song and dance, in which multiple “spider women,” played by girls in tight black pants, shake their asses and perform sultry dance numbers. Always spearheading the dance is the Spider Woman, threatening to assault the prisoners’ imaginations with her tantalizing but lethal touch. In this musical, proscribed gender roles are cast into question, as women are both objects of desire—Molina dreams of Aurora, Valentin of Marta—and also the ones responsible for cruel and unusual torture. The three prison wardens are modern Brides of Dracula, who move in gyrating motion, finish each other’s sentences, and play up their feminine wiles to extract information from prisoners, and Valentin chastises Molina for not acting “manly.” Like the black widow spider, who bites the male spider’s head off once she is impregnated, the women of Kiss are as fatal as they are seductive.

Not an easy or straightforward production to stage, the AUTS manages to pull off the musical with an impressive level of professionalism. The atmosphere is decidedly dark, with black bars framing the stage and serving as an artful means through which the prisoners can move their spider-like limbs. As the composers of Kiss, John Kander and Fred Ebb, are also responsible for shows like Cabaret and Chicago, it makes sense that the show depicts a dark, retro style.

Although quite hammy at times, Stewart’s portrayal of Molina is incredibly poignant; in addition to his Broadway-calibre singing, he manages at once to delight audiences with his off-hand jokes and stir emotion when he faces darker struggles like external homophobia and coercion by the wardens. Peters’s Valentin is less sympathetic, but his hauntingly beautiful vocal performance stirs. Finally, Jestadt handles her role as Aurora with poise and skill, capturing the spirit of the attention-mongering Hollywood actress without hogging the stage herself. The impressive size of the orchestral accompaniment also adds an essential dramatic component to support the singers.  

Based on the 1976 novel by Argentine writer Manuel Puig, the play grapples with the price of a disengaged aesthetic perspective; in a world where people are asked to take sides, maintaining that you are simply “co-operating” with an unjust authority is never a neutral stance. While Molina teaches Valentin about the subversive potential of escapism—as well as a few more scandalous lessons—Valentin teaches Molina the value of becoming an engaged citizen. The chorus repeats the haunting phrase “over the wall” to signal a world beyond the prison’s walls, but it is ironically within them that the psyche is able to discover new terrain.   

The Kiss of the Spider Woman runs at Moyse Hall, Jan. 27-29 at 7:30 p.m. $11. 

Features

Law School in Canada vs. USA

For students who have had their hearts set on going to law school since childhood, David Segal's recent New York Times article, "Is Law School a Losing Game?" offered a familiar but oft-ignored warning: Law school is difficult and expensive; proceed with caution.

In his article, chronicling the overwhelming debt and the unforgiving job market faced by an estimated 44,000 hopeful American JDs each year, Segal argues that the decision to pursue a legal degree should not be taken lightly, since, contrary to the statistics being published by the schools themselves, it's an investment that doesn't necessarily offer great returns. Of the 44,000 new graduates each year, only 26,000 find work in the legal field, according to statistics published by the National Association for Law Placement (NALP). The remaining 20,000 have to find a way to pay back their extensive student loans—often up to $250,000—with jobs outside their domain of expertise.

One of these new graduates, Kimber Russell, uses her blog to warn prospective students of the harsh realities of the legal services market in the United States. Both she and Segal point to the graduate employment statistics that schools publish as the source of the problem. These statistics determine school rankings, and thus the amount of funding and the calibre of new prospects they receive. This conflict of interest often results in the statistics' drastic exaggeration. Fourth-tier law schools will report rates of employment at 90 per cent nine months after graduation, counting those who work at McDonald's as well as post-grads working only on the day the survey was taken.

"It's pretty well-known that, for a long time, the statistics they've been putting out are grossly inflated," Russell says of the fourth-tier schools. "[They are] the worst offenders, in my mind."

Fact-fudging is not limited to the less prestigious schools, though. Segal gives the example of Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., which often provides temporary jobs for unemployed recent graduates in the university's admissions office. These positions are typically offered in January and February, which coincides with the nine-month mark, and new hires are then included among the number of Georgetown's statistically employed graduates, boosting the school's ranking.

"What the schools are saying doesn't jive with reality," Russell says. "If you're dropping that much, the law school should be held to a standard … the schools are culpable. It's not all delusion and wishful thinking on the part of the students."

The current situation is the result of a confluence of factors. In 2006, the American Bar Association approved the practice of outsourcing entry-level jobs, while the 2008 recession brought massive layoffs and a surge in all professional school applications by those looking to weather the economic downturn by returning to the ivory tower. In the wake of what Russell calls a "perfect storm," the market for entry-level law jobs is over-saturated, forcing indebted JDs to look elsewhere for employment. It's often necessary for recent grads to start earning money immediately since student loan repayments begin upon graduation and are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, and loan default results in the removal of your legal licence. Russell puts half of her monthly salary toward debt repayment—and considers herself lucky by comparison.

Meanwhile, North of the Border…

The situation in Canada is drastically different, and certainly more promising for prospective students. Much of what ails the American market has been preempted in Canada by an entirely distinct system in which there are both fewer schools and less divergence in terms of academic quality.

"The situation's a lot better in Canada because we have far fewer law schools," says Leeann Beggs, director of career services in the Faculty of Law at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. "The likelihood that you're going to get into your profession is very good."

While there are almost 200 American law schools, there are only 20 in Canada, all of which are highly competitive and prestigious. Because they are essentially "all tier one schools," Beggs says, it is very difficult to be admitted, but students can also be assured they will receive a high-quality legal education once they are there. Before passing the bar, law students are expected to article, or work and learn at a law firm in some sort of legal apprenticeship. Furthermore, there seems to be no sort of legal outsourcing being practised in Canada.

"It's pretty tightly controlled who gets access to legal work here," Beggs says.

This is in direct contrast to the hundreds of American law schools, not all of which are accredited—some of which are online—that graduate thousands of new lawyers each year who must then fight for a diminishing number of entry-level jobs. As a result of the Canadian system, recent graduates in this country have a much better chance of gaining the employment they desire. They have already been singled out as the best and the brightest and are competing against a much smaller pool. Some expectations may have to be lowered in terms of starting salaries, says Beggs, but new lawyers should have no problem getting a foot in the door.

The McGill Advantage

The story at McGill is even better, says Catherine Bleau, director of the Career Development Office in the Faculty of Law. McGill Law students receive both the standard Canadian common law degree and a civil law degree, due to the school's "trans-systemic" approach. Because of this unique approach, graduates can practice virtually anywhere they like: bilingual and with both degrees, they have access to markets in Quebec and the rest of Canada, as well as some states in the U.S. They are in such high demand, Bleau says; that about two years before graduating, almost half of the students will have jobs secured through organized recruiting.

Michael Bookman, a law student in his final year at McGill, is headed to a job in New York after graduation.

"What's great about McGill is that it provides you with the access to any legal market  you want," he says. "The reach is broader because of the civil law/common law degree in combination with its reputation and its quality."    

Nanci Ship, the director of development programs and student affairs at Davies Ward Philips and Vineberg, a law firm with offices in Montreal, New York, and Toronto, said her firm often recruits McGill Law grads.

"I'd have to say that McGill is obviously important to us," says Ship. "We have many alumni that come from McGill … it's an important school that we place a certain amount of emphasis on."

A More Supportive Environment

McGill aside, the Canadian system seems to have avoided some of the problems faced by its American counterpart because it is well regulated. Another important difference between law school in the two countries is the price tag associated with a law degree. Annual tuition alone can be as much as $45,000 in the States, compared to McGill's $3,700 for Quebec residents and $21,000 for international students, according to Bleau. At the University of Toronto, annual tuition sits at around $23,000, but this is on the high end of the scale, as most other schools average around $12,000.

"In Canada, the debt load does not really require you to go work for firms who do the kind of legal practice you don't want to do," Bookman says. "Law students are not forced into that the way they are in the U.S."

Even though the cost is comparatively low in Canada, Bookman was careful to emphasize that this doesn't mean law school is financially accessible to everyone.

"Cost is a factor to everybody … I don't care if you're paying in-province tuition or the international fee. It's a significant investment of time and money."

Another potential benefit of attending a Canadian law school is that the relatively small number of law schools in Canada has fostered a much more supportive environment than in the States. A reciprocity agreement between the schools, in which students can be referred to the career services office of another law school anywhere in the country, is indicative of this.

"We work together a lot," Bleau says. She was recently in contact with someone in the Faculty of Law at Dalhousie University in Halifax. A McGill graduate had been offered a job at a firm in Nova Scotia, and Bleau wanted to make sure the student's starting salary was the standard rate in the province. Career offices collaborate frequently and meet on a yearly basis to discuss the industry, she says.

Recruiting

The recruiting process is similarly well controlled, and overseen by the law school's career development office.

"It's pretty standardized; you know what to expect and when to expect it," Bookman says. After submitting an application, a candidate will be interviewed on-campus and then, during the second round, can be flown out to the firm's offices for another interview.

In what Ship calls "a highly competitive process," during which Davies interviews only 20 to 25 per cent of job applicants, law firms are looking to hire individuals who will fit in well with the firm's philosphy.

"It's not just about getting the best grades but having an interest in the law we do, [as well as] passion for things outside of the law," she says.

The Canadian Market

Although securing a job after graduation is clearly a competitive and comprehensive process, the relatively small number of new lawyers and the well-controlled nature of the industry means that new Canadian JDs have a much better chance of finding work than those in the U.S. While Bookman says fewer recruiters from New York have been coming to McGill lately, McGill graduates are eligible to practice law anywhere in Canada. Rather than go to New York, new JDs can find legal work in Toronto, rural Saskatchewan, or, of course, they can remain in Montreal.

In fact, Ship says, the job market in Montreal at the entry level is stable. The legal services market in Quebec has weathered the 2008 recession well; Davies' entry-level hiring has been roughly the same over the last few years.  

Once hired, the career path for a young lawyer "is pretty much standard in Quebec," Ship says. After being hired for a six month stage, the next step is to become a first-year lawyer, then a second-year lawyer, moving up the ranks and becoming eligible for partnership after the fourth year at the firm. While the workload of these young lawyers involves the typical litigation and document review that Russell describes as "tedious," but Ship calls "critical to the heart of what we're doing [at Davies]," their relative inexperience doesn't limit them to very basic legal work.

"I was very impressed by the level of development that was given to young lawyers at Davies (as compared to my prior experience as a lawyer in New York City) … Yes you're always supervised, but for every due diligence and document review, there's another frontline opportunity as well," Ship says, citing the example of one student's involvement in the drafting of a brief deposed before the Supreme Court during that student's first summer with the firm."

To Go or Not to Go?

It appears that unlike the situation in the U.S., life after law school isn't so bad in Canada. However, the Canadian experts agree that despite their differences, there remains one theme common to both the American and Canadian fields of legal education: the decision to go to law school should not be taken lightly, and it should not be the default destination for Arts students.

"Its fine to come to law school by curiosity, to save the world … but it's still a big decision, [involving] more than three years in school, and you have to justify why you did it," Bleau says, adding that graduates may realize they aren't "turned on by mergers and acquisitions."

Russell says that an undergraduate in political science, the typical applicant to law school, will find that the field of their undergraduate study has "absolutely nothing to do with law school."

Some of Bookman's peers have opted to find work at big consulting firms because the skills accrued at law school—problem-solving, writing, advocacy—are useful and transferable to careers in industries like government and business. Furthermore, he says, there is mobility across legal jurisdictions. However, Bookman urges prospective law students not to base their interest off how they have seen lawyers portrayed on films and television.

"I wouldn't expect anybody to take any of these choices lightly," he says, maintaining that it is important to inform yourself ahead of time of the costs involved with a law degree and what kind of work a lawyer does. "Personally, I very much benefitted from working in a different professional environment and seeing what lawyers were doing … and making the conscious choice to pursue that."

As Segal writes in his article, "Law school is a pie-eating contest where the first prize is more pie."

So before making the decision to go to law school, you had better make sure you like pie.

Science & Technology, Student Life

Intel attempts to limit access to pirated flicks

It could soon become more difficult to watch the latest Hollywood flick on your personal computer using illegal technology. The war between media producers and Internet piraters has been waging for years, and is unlikely to end soon. However, recent developments in the hardware world have shown that Hollywood is willing to take the next step in preventing illegal file sharing.

Many are familiar with the concept of digital rights management, or DRM for short. Apple used this technology for many years to limit the number of computers on which purchased music could be listened to. DRM is a software method for verifying that the owner of the machine is also the owner of the media they are trying to play on it. Opponents of the technology cite the restriction as a violation of users’ rights and a as barrier to free trade. Whether this is true or not depends entirely on who you ask.

The use of DRM is made possible by lower levels of competition. There are many sectors of technology that are dominated by only a few companies. For example, the field of desktop processing unit manufacturing is one of the many questionable oligopolies of Silicon Valley. The industry is dominated by two players: Intel and Advanced Micro Devices. While other companies like ARM and IBM exist, they are unable to compete with the two big dogs. Intel has long been known to produce slightly more powerful chips, albeit at a higher price, with Advanced Micro Devices offering more economical, but still very capable Central Processing Units, more commonly known as CPUs.

The latest weapon in the duel between the two is Intel’s new processor architecture, Sandy Bridge. With Sandy Bridge, Intel is offering one of the first octo-core processors, available later this year, using the smaller, 32 nanometre manufacturing technique. Additionally, some of the CPUs will ship with an unlocked clock multiplier, something Intel has not previously done. This new feature will allow manufacturers and enthusiasts to increase the speed of the processor to fit their needs.

Along with these new and exciting features, Intel is also making a more controversial move. The company is embedding a new technology directly into the processor architecture called Intel Insider Code. While the manufacturer claims this is not a type of DRM restriction, many claim otherwise.

Intel says that the Insider Code is a method of streaming high definition Hollywood films directly, without any threat of piracy. They claim this measure will make it safer for filmmakers to offer digital streaming copies of their movies. However, many are wary that the Insider Code is simply a control measure.

Whether or not Sandy Bridge is a form of DRM remains to be seen. However, it seems optimistic to assume that it will facilitate a decrease in piracy. Those looking for a cheap flick may opt to use an Advanced Micro Devices processor, or stick with an older chip on the Intel line. Whether or not this move by Intel will cause a market shift to the benefit of longtime underdog Advanced Micro Devices is an interesting question. If this does happen, it could cause a major shift in the CPU industry.

The expression Wwhere there’s a will, there’s a way” suggests that piracy is unavoidable. As hard as manufacturers try to thwart the dishonest movie watchers, they may be  fighting a lost battle. Intel can only hope that Sandy Bridge introduces enough new and exciting features that consumers won’t avoid buying the CPU altogether.

Student Life

Staying warm when going to class

In order to stay warm in this city during the winter months, the first thing you need to do is realize you will never stay warm in Montreal. Accept that as a fact. Now let’s move on.

Second, you need to ask yourself whether you want need to stay warm. Do you ever really want to leave the comfort of your apartment’s fireplace and enter the frozen tundra where you would need to try to stay warm? There are a few considerations to ponder within this question: Where are you going? Do you really need to be there? Can’t you just use Skype? These are difficult questions, so for now let’s focus on this dilemma as it relates to university students.

First question: Where are you going? Are you going to class? If the answer is yes, then you definitely do not need to go outside. Class is a waste of time and you won’t learn anything you can’t learn on YouTube, Wikipedia, or by “Asking Jeeves.” If, however, you’re one of those total nerds who feels the need to know what your professor is saying in lectures, try to make friends with someone who is tech-savvy and easily manipulated. You’re going to want to convince them to turn their computer towards the front of the class so you can just watch the lectures via Skype. It’s basically the same as watching a recorded lecture, but not all classes are recorded and you can’t ask or answer questions if this is the case, a luxury which you can enjoy while Skyping into class.

But imagine, for the sake of this discussion, that you are such a nerd that you “need” to physically attend class. What should you do to stay warm on the way to class? Let’s say you have a 9:30 a.m. class. Wake up at 6:30 a.m. at the latest and start pounding brews and doing shots off your roommates’ sleeping bellies. Contrary to what science may or may not say, drinking will definitely keep you warm. I’m not really sure why, but I think its has something to do with the fact that you’ll be having so much fun drinking that you’ll forget how cold it is outside. Furthermore, the rush you’ll get from drinking so early in the morning will surely add to your excitement and enjoyment, thereby helping you ignore your oncoming frostbite. And don’t start complaining that you don’t want to drink that early in the morning. You’re in university and you should start acting like it.

I should note that before you get too drunk, you should put on long underwear. It will help keep you warm in general, and will also be useful if you get lost during the journey from your apartment to Leacock.

At this point you should be pretty drunk—drunk enough that you would feel comfortable talking to a police officer about his horse’s droppings, drunk enough that you have lost some inhibitions, but not drunk enough to get arrested for public intoxication.

Now you’re ready to go to class. You might also want to consider having a text message typed out and ready to send to your friend telling them that you’ve passed out in a snow bank and might die. Right now, you’re pretty drunk, so watch out for snow banks; those things come out of nowhere, man.

If you do succeed in finding your classroom, try to keep your voice down as you enter. This will be quite difficult because, at this point, everything you have to say is probably very funny and smart —right now you feel great, nothing can stop you. Remember this feeling because it will soon be overcome by the feeling of vomit.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue