Latest News

Social Media

Why Twitter struck a deal with Google

This is some dummy copy. You’re not really supposed to read this dummy copy, it is just a place holder for people who need some type to visualize what the actual copy might look like if it were real content.

If you want to read, I might suggest a good book, perhaps Hemingway or Melville. That’s why they call it, the dummy copy. This, of course, is not the real copy for this entry. Rest assured, the words will expand the concept. With clarity. Conviction. And a little wit.

In today’s competitive market environment, the body copy of your entry must lead the reader through a series of disarmingly simple thoughts.

All your supporting arguments must be communicated with simplicity and charm. And in such a way that the reader will read on. (After all, that’s a reader’s job: to read, isn’t it?) And by the time your readers have reached this point in the finished copy, you will have convinced them that you not only respect their intelligence, but you also understand their needs as consumers.

As a result of which, your entry will repay your efforts. Take your sales; simply put, they will rise. Likewise your credibility. There’s every chance your competitors will wish they’d placed this entry, not you. While your customers will have probably forgotten that your competitors even exist. Which brings us, by a somewhat circuitous route, to another small point, but one which we feel should be raised.

Long copy or short – You decide

As a marketer, you probably don’t even believe in body copy. Let alone long body copy. (Unless you have a long body yourself.) Well, truth is, who‘s to blame you? Fact is, too much long body copy is dotted with such indulgent little phrases like truth is, fact is, and who’s to blame you. Trust us: we guarantee, with a hand over our heart, that no such indulgent rubbish will appear in your entry. That’s why God gave us big blue pencils. So we can expunge every example of witted waffle.

For you, the skies will be blue, the birds will sing, and your copy will be crafted by a dedicated little man whose wife will be sitting at home, knitting, wondering why your entry demands more of her husband‘s time than it should.

But you will know why, won‘t you? You will have given her husband a chance to immortalize himself in print, writing some of the most persuasive prose on behalf of a truly enlightened purveyor of widgets. And so, while your dedicated reader, enslaved to each mellifluous paragraph, clutches his newspaper with increasing interest and intention to purchase, you can count all your increased profits and take pots of money to your bank. Sadly, this is not the real copy for this entry. But it could well be. All you have to do is look at the account executive sitting across your desk (the fellow with the lugubrious face and the calf-like eyes), and say ”Yes! Yes! Yes!“ And anything you want, body copy, dinners, women, will be yours. Couldn’t be fairer than that, could we?

a, Martlets, Sports

Martlets dispatch lowly Stingers

 

McGill Redmen
65

 

 

Concordia Stingers
54

 

How do you stop the Martlets’ junior centre Alex Kiss-Rusk? The Concordia Stingers (4-8) certainly didn’t have an answer to that question Thursday night, as the McGill Martlets (11-1) downed their opponents 65-54 in Love Competition Hall. While their 11-point home victory wasn’t enough to impress Head Coach Ryan Thorne, their 72-48 dismantling of the Stingers on the road did the trick for the 11th-year coach.

The Martlets found themselves down 7-0 to start the game but an 11-point second quarter by Kiss-Rusk had McGill up three at the half.

“She’s 6’4—she’s big,” Thorne said. “She can dominate in the paint, and when she looks to dominate in the paint, [good] things will happen.”

According to Thorne, he has been on Kiss-Rusk’s case for being too unselfish and passing out of scoring opportunities, but three straight games with 15, 20, and 14 points respectively should be enough for her to dispel her coach’s criticism.

The Martlets stretched their lead to seven in the third quarter, but they just couldn’t put away the Stingers, who took a two-point lead just before the seven-minute mark in the fourth. McGill fought back, led by fourth-year wing Marie-Love Michel, who came up big for the Martlets, scoring a season high nine points, all in the fourth quarter.

 

“We can fight when it’s time to […] but I already knew that,” Thorne said about his veteran squad. “We’ve got a good group of girls [who] have been there before and they know what it means to dig deep.”

 

While the Martlets continued to prove that they’re a tough team to put away, Thorne was unhappy with his team’s defence.

 

“Not happy, I don’t think we played well,” Thorne said. “I think Concordia fought hard [.…] Our overall team defence was poor and we let them get easy opportunities. I don’t think that’s the level of basketball we should be playing.”

 

Thorne’s post-game comments come as a bit of a surprise after his squad held Concordia seven per cent below their season shooting average and forced the Stingers into 6.5 more turnovers than their season average.

 

On Saturday, hoping to spark his squad, Thorne rejigged his starting lineup. Guard Carolann Cloutier found her way into the starting lineup, taking over for the struggling Marika Guerin. The move paid off for the Martlets, who shot 42.6 per cent from the field while holding the Stingers to their second-worst offensive performance of their season.

 

Concordia once again jumped out early, but a 23-point second frame by the Martlets coupled with some stingy defence was just too much for the Stingers to handle. Mariam Sylla led the way for McGill with 18 points on a scorching 78 per cent shooting. Cloutier again scored 12 points, this time as a starter, while Jenn Silver was dominant off the bench with 11 points and six rebounds.

 

The Martlets head to Bishop’s this Valentine’s Day for what could be a very one-sided game. The Gaiters have yet to win a game this season and haven’t put up much of a fight against McGill this season. If the Martlets come away with a victory in Lennoxville, they’ll have a chance to clinch the top seed in the RSEQ tournament in front of the McGill faithful Feb. 19 when they face off against the UQÀM Citadins.

a, Science & Technology

World Cancer Day

With the combined efforts of the Cedars Cancer Foundation, Cedars CanSupport, and The Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, the third annual World Cancer Day was held in a fully packed amphitheater at the Montreal Neurological Hospital. The public forum focused mostly on palliative care—care for the terminally ill—with this year’s theme titled “How to Survive Cancer? Not Beyond Us.”

The night opened with a moving talk from two-time cancer survivor Tristin Williams. Despite undergoing multiple surgeries, a titanium hip replacement, and radiation therapy, Williams remains strong in the face of cancer.

“Living with cancer can be difficult, but with our life stories, we can inspire the minds of those who could lead us in the direction toward healing and could one day find a cure for this disease,” Williams said.

He urged the audience to observe a moment of silence for those who had lost their battle to cancer. The silence ended when Williams struck a drum, increasing the tempo and volume until the crowd joined in to clap with the beat. In a beautiful moment of harmony, Williams set the tone for the evening, calling on the audience to focus on the energy of survival. 

Dr. Manuel Borod, an assistant professor of oncology at McGill, then introduced the Division of Supportive and Palliative Care at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), followed by the forum experts. 

As the Director of Survivorship at MUHC, Dr. Gen Chaput highlighted the burgeoning need for survivorship care. 

“Right now, there’s approximately one million cancer survivors in Canada,” Chaput explained. “By 2020, that number is expected to go to two million.”

Chaput’s presentation touched on developing research on ‘chemo brain’—that is, a brain’s function being altered due to chemotherapy, higher rates of sexual dysfunction, sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression among cancer survivors. With survivor rates increasing, Chaput emphasized that it is increasingly important to provide palliative care.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526 Canadians diagnosed per day
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Afterwards, Dr. Jordi Perez, an anesthesiologist and cancer pain specialist, explained the importance and stigma behind cancer pain drugs. Perez aims, through his work, to provide targeted treatment to maximize effectiveness and minimize side effects.

Dr. Robert Kilgour, associate director of the McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory, gave a presentation on exercise and nutrition to conclude the World Cancer Day talks. Because cancer patients are immunocompromised, they need a clean environment to stay healthy. As part of his basic nutritional recommendations, Kilgour emphasized the importance of consuming calories and maintaining a healthy weight.

“People tend to cling to the new things in the news, the next miracle product,” Kilgour explained. “Our clinical nutritionists want to bring people back to the basics.”

Kilgour then highlighted the need for research in the developing field of exercise oncology. Common knowledge demonstrates the importance of regular physical activity for healthy people, but staying active is even more important for cancer patients.

“We do know […] that in specific subsets of cancer patients, you can see up to a 30 to 40 per cent risk reduction in breast cancer and colorectal cancer recurrence,” Kilgour said.

Staying physically active means that patients are less likely to have to wait for further treatments if the doctors fear the patient is too weak.

“There’s a very narrow window of time between diagnosis and the time they start treatment,” Kilgour explained. “As exercise scientists, we take advantage of any time period to help the patient become a stronger individual so that they can take chemotherapy and radiation therapy […] so that they’ll become a ‘better’ patient.”

The World Cancer Day presentations pointed to a more holistic sense of care to improve patients’ quality of life during and after treatment. Though many have lost their battle, the public forum cast a hopeful light onto the future of cancer care.

“Let us fight for all the individuals we have lost in the cancer community,” Williams urged. “They will never be forgotten. Let the impact that they have had on our lives give us the fuel to keep pushing forward.” 

a, McGill, News

AMUSE General Meeting approves union merger with MUNACA

The Association of McGill University Support Employees (AMUSE) members voted to approve a merger with McGill University Non-Academic Certified Association (MUNACA) in their General Meeting (GM) on Feb. 2. The approval confirms that the merger will be going forward, as MUNACA members approved the same proposal at their December GM

President of AMUSE Amber Gross and President of MUNACA Kevin Whittaker presented the merger proposal to members of the GM, outlining the details.

“We put out the first formal proposal in June, did info sessions to get feedback from members, and then in November we presented the final plan,” Gross explained. “This motion […] recommends how to move forward, which is to [prepare] bylaws and [a] new budget, and present to a general assembly with both our memberships.” 

MUNACA currently represents around 1,400 non-academic support staff who are generally permanent workers, while AMUSE comprises of around 1,300 to 1,400 non-academic support staff who work on a short-term basis. This consists mainly of students, and many AMUSE and MUNACA members work at similar jobs.

According to Gross and Whittaker, the two unions would merge administratively, but retain their separate collective agreements and bargaining.  The merger committee also explained that one of the main reasons for the merger was to prevent the further ‘casualization’ of positions at McGill, which would allocate more positions originally filled by permanent employees towards casual employees. 

“That means jobs on campus are becoming more precarious, lower-paid, and provide far fewer benefits overall,” the final report of the merger committee reads. “Both groups need to be constantly aware of job abolitions and replacements, and respond together [….] An administrative merger like this means that […] we can coordinate and work together as we each bargain separately, supporting our respective members with increased numbers. ”

Arne Nelson, U1 Arts student and AMUSE member, voiced his concerns regarding the merger at the GM.

“My concern is […] AMUSE members are casual employees, but most of them are also students,” Nelson said. “I’m not seeing the benefits as they’re being put forth [….] My question is, does it truly make sense for us to merge necessarily […and] should we focus on establishing an institutional framework?” 

In response, Gross addressed the concerns that AMUSE’s voice might be swallowed up by MUNACA in the merger. 

“It’s a big concern of mine, we worked to [increase] the representation of our members […] MUNACA should be getting way more representation than what’s presented in the proposal but we worked to get [AMUSE representation] to a higher level,” she said. “I think it will also help make our union stronger, because MUNACA has a lot of experience that AMUSE doesn’t necessarily [have]. A lot of our executives are here only for two, three years.”

Gross continued to say the merger was supported by the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), a trade union that is currently the parent union of both AMUSE and MUNACA. 

“[The PSAC] recommendation is [for us] to merge as well, as it makes sense,” Gross explained. “Their support will be doubled. We do such similar work in the same workplaces, yet they’re supporting two separate unions doing it, so it gets broad and things get divided. [The merger] will help them provide better support to both of our [members].”

Looking forward, Gross says the two unions will work together to finish drafting the bylaws, which will be presented to a joint assembly of the constituents of both unions later in the year. 

a, Features

Finding the tipping point: Struggling with the Quebec healthcare system

When Sean* first started noticing symptoms of an ear infection in September 2013, he took the day off work to get it checked out at the clinic. He had experienced painful symptoms for several consecutive days, to the point where waiting it out no longer seemed to be the best option. But he expected that one day off work to be enough.

“My first visit [to the clinic], I was three days in [with the infection],” Sean said. “I waited until I felt like it was pretty obvious [….] I saw a doctor after waiting about two hours, which is standard for a clinic [….] He looked at it for maybe two seconds, and said ‘I don’t really see anything wrong with it.’”

But to Sean, there was something wrong.

“It was really sore,” Sean recalled. “My ear canal was swollen—you could try to put a Q-tip in, but it wouldn’t pass.”

A story like Sean’s is not uncommon in the medical field. Patients visit clinics frequently with symptoms they claim are correlated with a certain disease they found on the internet, and doctors dismiss it upon inspection, assuring patients that they just need to wait it out. With something like an ear infection, which can often clear up on its own, patients seeking treatment will often end up going home empty-handed, asked to weather the storm.

But in Sean’s case, the storm had grown more and more menacing within the next week. He returned to the clinic, and this time, the doctor told him, “There’s definitely something wrong here.” 

He was sent home with a bottle of eardrops without a complete explanation of what he was given, then asked to leave in a hurry.

Anyone who has attempted to visit a walk-in clinic may have experienced something similar. With issues that don’t send people immediately en route to the emergency room, they can expect long waits or frustratingly inflexible intake hours. For the clinic Sean visited, it seemed not unlike standing in a Black Friday queue outside a department store, waiting for the doors to swing open.

“You call the night before and there’s an automated system,” Sean explained. “You call after 7:30 p.m., and you get assigned to a slot for the next day. Usually if you call anytime past 7:40 p.m., you’re not gonna get a slot. It’s that busy.”

But when every resident or temporary resident of Quebec is covered under the Health Insurance Plan and a trip to the clinic costs nothing, why seek out alternative options such as expensive private health care? According to a Canadian Community Health Survey from 2013, 25.1 per cent of Quebec residents do not have a regular doctor, compared to the national average of 15.5 per cent. However, a Statistics Canada health report also published that there has been anywhere between 30 to 40 per cent of an increase in out-of-pocket expenditures on health care, depending on income quartile.

So Sean, after trying the ear drops for a couple days and still experiencing pain, went back yet again to the same clinic.

“So now we’re at the third visit,” Sean explained. “I go back to the clinic, and the third doctor said, ‘There’s nothing wrong with your ear.’”

Sean didn’t give in so easily, though. He had three clinic visits under his belt and an inflamed ear exhibiting no real improvement, so the doctor agreed to invite another doctor to come in to inspect it. The second doctor suggested giving Sean another set of eardrops. The result?

“They didn’t work.”

In between this process, Sean also went to a family doctor for an unrelated health issue. The family doctor told him that there was definitely something wrong with his ear, so he gave Sean both pills and drops. 

Those worked—at first.

“A couple weeks later, I was getting different symptoms,” Sean said. “Now, my ear was not just swollen and in pain, but there was [also] fluid [coming out of it].”

His family doctor gave him painkillers to address the pain, while referring him to an ENT—an ear, nose, and throat specialist. But, as many people have experienced firsthand, booking an appointment with a specialist is not a next-day affair. Sean wasn’t able to see the ENT until two months later.

“[The ENT] took a look at my ear, and he said, ‘I see some scar tissue, and I’m gonna have to get a camera in there,” Sean recalled. “So I’m gonna need you to call my secretary and make an appointment for February. This was in October.”

By February, the infection had spread to Sean’s sinus, to the point where he had reddish-orange fluid dripping from his nose. To some, it may have been a cue to visit the emergency room. But Sean was hesitant to do so.

“At this point, I already had an appointment with the ENT [scheduled], and I had already taken so many days off work,” he explained.

So instead, he kept waiting. Yet any hope for a successful visit with the specialist was quickly dashed upon arrival. 

“When I finally got there, he had two students—that’s not usually a problem—except he didn’t look me in the eyes the entire time,” Sean said. “There was no communication with me [….] He ended up finding that there was scar tissue from the infection in my eardrum. So he went in and pulled it out with a pair of tweezers and sent me on my way.”

Sean said that although some of the most alarming symptoms—the bloody pus and unidentified fluids—have waned, he still felt the repercussions from spending months with an infected ear, even a year after his very first visit.

“There’s still random swelling,” Sean said. “I’ll wake up in the morning and it’ll be red and throbbing. My sense of smell was damaged for quite a while [….] I can’t distinguish smells like I used to [….] I actually saw my family doctor after all this […] and he said, ‘Well, yeah, your ear is damaged. There’s some scarring [there]. It looks like it’s been through hell.’”

Sean’s story is a middling case on a strangely warped spectrum of symptom severity, and it raises plenty of questions and concerns about boundary lines. When does a condition become alarming enough to head straight to the emergency room? When does it qualify as dismissible enough to be sent away from a walk-in with a nasal spray or antibiotics in hand but nothing more? What happens when a medical issue escalates to the point where everyone is left thinking, “If only we had caught it earlier?” And what is the case for those who did try to catch it early on, as Sean attempted with his very first clinic visit?

Sean emphasized that not all of his health care issues have been difficult—he recalled a past trip to the emergency room, where he was effectively and properly treated within two hours. 

In his experience, Sean had done his best to utilize the health care system as it stood—but between all the clinic visits and specialist referrals, he still struggled to feel properly cared for and treated. Ultimately, he was forced to rely on the way the system had herded him from one location to the next, all without fixing the reason for his initial visit. 

The health care system isn’t perfect, and an ear infection—among other medical issues that can arise—does not have a one-cure-fits-all solution. Sean explained that it was hard to know for sure where the underlying issues were for any of his seven visits to clinics, doctors, and specialists. He couldn’t attribute the lack of treatment to anything in particular. But he stood by his statement from the beginning—that even when doctors were telling him that nothing was wrong, it was clear to him—and others around him—that something wasn’t normal.

“My friends were looking at my ear and going, ‘Dude, what’s wrong with your ear? It looks really messed up,” Sean said. “I don’t know if it was that [the doctors] were in such a hurry to get me out of there that they didn’t notice, or it didn’t look severe enough, or [if] they saw that another doctor [had] increased the treatment for it [already]. I don’t know. I really don’t know.”

 

*Sean’s last name has been omitted for anonymity purposes.

a, News, PGSS

PGSS discusses McGill’s potential acquisition of Royal Victoria Hospital

Ratification of Secretary-General’s resignation

The Council passed a motion to ratify Juan Pinto’s resignation from the position of the Secretary-General. Pinto will officially leave his position on Feb. 16.

Future of Royal Victoria Hospital

McGill Vice-Principal (Communications and External Relations) Olivier Marcil spoke to the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) Council to discuss future plans for expanding the McGill campus through the purchase of the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH) property.

Marcil explained that concerns for the increasing lack of space on campus prompted the idea for the project. If purchased, the hospital would increase the size of the current campus by 10 per cent.

“It’s clear that at McGill, we have a deficit of space that is recognized by the government of Quebec,” Marcil said. “We are struggling to find some new space to put some bigger classes and new labs to meet our academic purpose and to make sure we can enhance of student life on campus.”

According to Marcil, purchasing and renovating the RVH would cost about $800 million. $250 million would be supplied from McGill University. The remaining $550 million would be supplied by both the federal and provincial governments. Marcil explained that McGill is tentatively looking to tear down and rebuild certain buildings within the property, although he stressed that the architectural heritage of the older buildings would be preserved in the renovation process.

PGSS Financial Affairs Officer Nikki Meadows raised a question regarding the funding for the plans.

“We know that McGill has one of the highest deferred maintenance costs across Canada, and you’re talking about a project that’s going to be roughly $250 million coming from McGill,” she said  “Where are we going to get that money, because there is already a ton of maintenance that we can’t pay for?”

In response, Marcil explained that McGill had considered deferred maintenance costs when accounting for the price of purchasing RVH.

“[The funding] will come from two aspects. First, we will have to sell some of our assets,” he explained. “We also rent right now a lot of spaces in downtown Montreal that have huge costs because we don’t have the spaces on campus.  In consolidating some aspects, we can save every year from it.”

Marcil stated that there is currently no clear plan for what departments or classes will be held at the RVH. A feasibility study will be conducted to assess how McGill can renovate and use the space.  The full project is expected to be completed in April 2021, should the purchase go through.

As of now, there are no competing projects proposed for the RVH. 

Student fees and student status

Leslie Cheung, a Sociology post-graduate student, spoke to motivate a motion regarding reinstatement fees, which are charged to students who have become de-registered from their programs and then must apply to be reinstated.

De-registration is a common result for a student unable to complete their degree within an allotted time period. For example, students in master’s programs must complete their degree within three years of registering for the program or risk de-registration. Students who exceed time limitations have the option of applying to be reinstated to their program.

A document on the McGill website explains that students applying for reinstatement would be charged tuition for the semesters in which their status was de-registered. 

“Upon registration of reinstatement, the student must pay the required fees according to the scheduled thesis submission,” the statement reads. “The amount of reinstatement fees is the tuition portion of fees owed for all registered terms up to a maximum of two years prior to the term of reinstatement.”

Students who are ready to submit their thesis within two years of being de-registered are charged retroactive fees for semesters in which they were not registered, which could total up to six semesters.  Students would have to pay for a student status they did not benefit from.

Cheung advocated for the immediate suspension of the current policy that charges students for student status that is not rendered.

Board of Directors proposition

Régine Debrosse, Council Director, raised concerns with the governance structure of the PGSS Board of Directors (BoD).  

“I’ve identified 3 issues: One of them is the lack of independence of the board,” Debrosse said. “It would help them to be more diligent if they had an independent chair that was not necessarily the Secretary-General [….] We should let board members elect their own chair.”

Debrosse raised a second concern, stating that the BoD could also improve its stability and accessibility as an organization by increasing in the number of members on the board.  She suggested adding two more members at large, which would increase the BoD’s composition from seven to nine members.

Debrosse’s third concern involved the selection procedure for BoD members.

“[Other board] members are named by board members,” Debrosse said. “I think there should be a way to elect board members in a way that’s a bit more democratic and open.  So my solution is perhaps to elect board members at the [annual general meeting].”

Debrosse said that she would come to the next Council meeting with a formalized proposal.

CFS funding

In a recent referendum, the PGSS voted against continued membership with the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS). A stipulation of running the referendum was the retroactive payment of $270,000 in membership fees from the PGSS to the CFS. Health Commissioner Elizabeth Cawley expressed concerns regarding the BoD’s decision to agree to this stipulation and asked how PGSS would fund the payment.

In response, Meadows explained that PGSS would source funds through several means, including the PGSS special projects fund. 

“We have a line of credit that we are working under.  We are currently figuring out what the long-term solution and resolution to the situation is,” Meadows said. “But for now, we are using internal money and reallocating funds from what we have and if we need to, we have a line of credit that we can access.”

a, Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Dialogue at the great divide

Those who have spent any considerable amount of time in Montreal are aware that the issue of multilingualism is more than simply one of communication. It’s a complex narrative of social history, political debate, and the search for individual identity—all inexorably linked to the myriad of personal histories that inform the beliefs of every Montrealer. In their most recent production held at the Mainline Theatre, Promito Playback presented Traverser la Main, a presentation that explores stories of multilingualism in everyday Montreal life with all of the nuance, personality, and eccentricity of the city itself. 

Playback theatre, which is improvised theatrical performance based upon stories casually shared by audience members, is a deeply personal medium that places the direction and tone of the production entirely in the hands of the viewer. It allows the stories told by the cast to be a direct reflection of the experiences and beliefs of those attending the performance. Promito Playback has had extensive experience using playback theatre as a medium to explore the perspectives from everyday life on controversial issues, performing shows discussing topics such as racism and sexual identity. The careful nature and comfort of Promito Playback in presenting varied opinions and beliefs allowed Traverser la Main to be an accepting yet probing environment in which each audience member’s preconceived notions of the issue at hand were simultaneously respected and challenged.     

The production itself was deceptively simple for the weight of the topic, with no complex adornments on the black box stage or any unified costumes. The stage was decorated with nothing more than four black stools, and the only props utilized were simple sheets of coloured fabric. To generate ambience, each scene was subtly punctuated by the sounds of various obscure traditional instruments played quietly at stage right. The rawness of the production allowed all attention to be drawn to the stories themselves, with little to no distraction by superfluous theatricality. Each interpretation was performed with less of a focus on direct representation of the story, and greater emphasis on the emotions associated with it. The dramatic and at times intense portrayals of emotion in each scene often bore more of the distinct feel of conceptual performance art than of traditional playback theatre.

Each story was told and subsequently performed in the native or preferred tongue of the storyteller, leading to a completely comfortable and fluidly bilingual show. The use of multiple languages in the presentation did not only allow each story to be told in the most comfortable way for the storyteller, but also clearly and deliberately mirrored the very themes the show itself presented.

While the acting and production were artful and engaging, the true value and meaning of the evening came from the diverse, probing, and sometimes shocking stories provided by the audience. Some were simple and uplifting tales of acquiring a new language, while others were heavy with decades of pain and struggle. Stories of growing up as a francophone in the shadow of Bill 63 were dramatically contrasted with stories of anglophone immigrants struggling to learn and work in French in modern Montreal. All stories were welcomed with equal enthusiasm, and the theatrical interpretations were of profound depth. Throughout the evening, the portrayals of each story combined to form a complex and multifaceted image of what it truly is to be a member of the community as a whole—whether as an anglophone or francophone.

Perhaps most engaging of all was the continued open discussion on the topic encouraged by the cast and crew after the show. As with their other performances, the Promito Playback team invited the audience to continue conversation in the comfortable living-room-style lobby of the Mainline Theatre after the conclusion of the performance. There, audience members congregated, indulged in refreshments, and delved deeper into the topics of the evening. By generating this type of impassioned discussion, Traverser la Main powerfully realized the artistic vision of its cast—showcasing the true complexity, humanity, and individuality so inseparably linked with language identity in Montreal.

a, Opinion

Commentary: A progressive paradox

Across North America, left-wing politicians are proposing a raft of new spending programs. In Canada, both Justin Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair have plans for universal, government-funded childcare, and in the United States, President Obama wants to introduce tuition-free community college. There are good arguments both for and against these programs, but they come with indisputably high costs.

To finance his community college initiative, Obama planned to tax college savings accounts. These tax-exempt savings vehicles are popular among upper-middle class Americans as a means of paying for higher education. Upon announcing the proposal, there was an immediate backlash, even among members of the president’s own party. As such, the proposal was quickly tabled.

This episode reveals the inherent contradiction at the heart of North American centre-left politics today. Politicians realize that the appetite for new social entitlements is large, yet they seem unwilling to ask the primary beneficiaries of many of these programs—the middle class—to pick up a reasonable share of the tab. Instead they target narrow groups in society. For example, Obama and Mulcair both wish to target corporations, the financial services industry, and high income earners, while Trudeau claims he will not raise taxes at all.

Much of this paradox can probably be traced to the large-scale tax cuts that have been enacted over the past decades. Though this trend was far more prevalent in the United States, the extent of similar political developments in Canada should not be trivialized. As politicians cut taxes, they also seemed more than happy to go on both enhancing the generosity of existing programs and implementing new ones. The tax-cutting wave gave the broad public the financial benefits of lower taxes, but did not reduce services.

While these actions may have seemed sustainable in the boom years prior to 2008, the financial crisis and tepid recovery since have laid bare the stark reality of persistent structural deficits.

Politicians realize that the appetite for new social entitlements is large, yet they seem unwilling to ask the primary beneficiaries of many of these programs—the middle class—to pick up a reasonable share of the tab.

The present fiscal conditions of many governments have left them with few means of paying for their desired spending initiatives. In Ontario, for example, Premier Kathleen Wynne suggested a modest increase in the provincial gasoline tax to pay for infrastructure improvements. The hostility from the public was so great that she quickly cancelled the broad-based tax increase and instead announced an increase in income taxes for high earners, which would only amount to a small fraction of the money she initially wished to spend.

The United States is also on an unsustainable budgetary trajectory, yet Obama continues to peddle the illusion that the public finances can be put on a sound footing and current levels of government services can be maintained by reversing income tax cuts only for the very wealthy. It has always been hard to raise taxes on the largest swath of constituents, but now it seems tantamount to political suicide.

If the centre-left in Canada and the United States wants this expansion of government, it will have to pay for it. Taxing the rich will only yield so much revenue and economic evidence suggests that high marginal tax rates can discourage savings, investment, and economic growth. Thus, they would be well-advised to learn from the social democratic bastions of Scandinavia. Contrary to popular belief, the Scandinavian nations such as Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland do not derive most of the revenue needed to pay for the welfare state from the rich. Sweden, for example, has a less progressive tax code than the United States. Instead, these Scandinavian governments primarily raise revenue from far-reaching and somewhat regressive consumption taxes like a Goods and Services Tax. These taxes, while regressive, do less damage to the economy than alternatives like progressive income taxes or capital taxes, as they don’t penalize savings, investment, or work. They also provide a stable source of funding for the welfare state by ensuring that most of the population is involved in its financing.

Given demographic pressures that existing social benefits face, expanding the welfare state will be difficult without substantial increases in revenue from the middle class. If the centre-left desires a larger government, it should try to address the tradeoffs inherent in that goal. It will have to convince the broad taxpaying middle class to pay for the new programs they say they want to ensure that they are fiscally sustainable. To do otherwise would leave Canadians without a debate over the costs and benefits of new government programs.

a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Grunge that’s not Nirvana

“Touch Me I’m Sick”

Artist: Mudhoney

Album: Single

Released: March, 1988

Mudhoney stands as one of the major—yet completely overshadowed—forerunners of the Seattle Grunge scene. “Touch Me I’m Sick,” their debut single, brought the dirty, fuzzy, bass-driven sound pervading the city’s indie scene to the cultural fore, paving the way for many larger acts to follow. The track’s biting lyrics, snarling vocals, and raw, ‘untrained’ vibe garnered widespread appeal from youth across the U.S., who, tired of the overly sexualized rock stars of glam metal, were seeking something heavier. Punk and heavy metal influences run rampant in this historic track, and truly cemented early grunge as a genuine counterculture movement.

c“Even Flow”

Artist: Pearl Jam

Album: Ten

Release: August 27, 1991

Often marked as a grunge band, Pearl Jam remains one of the most commercially successful bands of the ’90s era, yet its lack of ‘hardcore’ elements, or edge, makes the grunge labeling, which prizes counterculture notions, seem questionable. “Even Flow,” with its axe-tastic shredding and wah-powered guitars, is by no means a bad track, offering a new take on an old hard rock sound; however, when compared to early bands under the same genre, there is hardly a resemblance. “Even Flow” highlights the broadand ever broadeningnature of the grunge genre label that ultimately led to its demise.

“Rain When I Die”

Artist: Alice In Chains 

Album: Dirt

Released: September 29, 1992

Despite not being a single off of Dirt, “Rain When I Die” succeeds in encapsulating the sounds of a more ‘mature,’ or technical grunge. The pleasantly nauseating psychedelic intro, haunting vocal harmonies of the verse, and overall heavy but relaxed groove of this track is notably different in terms of complexity and feel when compared to  the classic garage grunge band. It nonetheless aggressively plucks at the same heartstrings of melancholy and angst pioneered by earlier bands. 

“Black Hole Sun”

Artist: Soundgarden 

Album: Superunknown

Released: March 8, 1994

This classic track off of Superunknown demonstrates the blessed union that can exist between sorrow and serenity common within grunge music.  The brooding, surreal lyrics drenched in gloom are brilliantly contrasted with the bubbly, mirthful sound of the arpeggiated guitar throughout the track, forming a dreamscape like no other. Chris Cornell, Soundgarden’s frontman, has himself explicitly confirmed the ‘lack’ of direct meaning within the track. While this lyrical openness may turn off many modern listeners, at the time of its release, it was believed that such subjectivity was a way to make music more accessible and personal in lieu of expanding mainstream monoculture. 

a, Editorial, Opinion

Editorial: Bridging the gap between students and mental health resources

Rates of stress, anxiety, and depression among university students have been increasing, as seen in recent studies conducted by the Cooperative Institutional Research Program, prompting the need for increased access to mental health services on campuses.

Although financial constraints have put a damper on increasing mental health support, university-offered resources and student-run services are still widely offered across campus at McGill. Despite the vast array of mental health services, there are still many students who are not receiving the support they need. Whether this is due to a sense of alienation from institutional resources, a lack of student awareness, or any other number of reasons involving symptom recognition or stigma is uncertain. However, in order to bridge that gap at McGill, the university must improve communication with students about the resources available, and the campus discussion surrounding mental health must continue to move towards destigmatization.

Awareness and support for mental health have improved at McGill and within society in recent years, as evidenced by initiatives such as the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Mental Health Awareness Week, and Bell Canada’s Let’s Talk campaign to promote conversations about mental health. Still, there is a long way to go before the stigma surrounding mental illness is eradicated. Destigmatization requires raising widespread awareness of the realities of mental illness in order to gradually eliminate peoples’ notions of mental illness that are based on judgments. Education about mental health must exist on a spectrum, and discussions about different factors mental illness are necessary steps towards eliminating stigma. Until destigmatization happens—not only at McGill, but throughout society—many people suffering from mental illness might not seek support out of fear of being judged.

Another barrier that inhibits students from seeking help is that they might not be aware of the different services at their disposal and what they offer. If the vast array of services offered by the university is not clearly communicated, students will likely not access the mental help support that they may need.

Open and healthy discussion on mental health is also needed to make the mental health services at McGill more approachable. McGill should seek to promote these services as more personable in order to further prompt students to use them. In addition to the promotion of mental health resources by McGill, peer support is also required to encourage students to seek help. Friends and classmates should be cognizant of issues that others might be facing, and provide the positive encouragement that people need to go seek out help. Encouragement from people within a student’s daily life is crucial to getting them help early on.

Universities must undertake concrete actions to ensure that students have access to mental health services. The mere presence of these services is not enough to ensure their practical use.

The professional mental health services offered by the university don’t have the capacity to handle all of the cases that are brought to them, which also leads to students not receiving adequate support. Understaffing and lack of financing for these services have forced them to adopt policies that limit student access. There are long waiting times and high rates for appointments with Mental Health Services (MHS). In addition, the Counselling Service (CS) limits the number of visits allowed per person to 15 per year. The inclusion of professional mental health workers in student-run services, which are easier for students to access, could help to improve the ability of campus resources to meet students’ needs.

Outside of the McGill Residence system, there is also a lack of a support structure that provides information and encouragement to students in a small community atmosphere. For upper year students or the many first-year students not living in residence, this requires promoting services to students in a targeted way. A mention of different mental health services from a professor at the start of the semester, for example, could provide a similar sense of accessibility, communication, and support that would encourage students, within their daily lives, to use the service. The substructure of mental health resources needs to be connected to university and student life in a meaningful way that doesn’t separate the resources from the students’ normal environment.

The unfortunate truth is that the majority of individuals with mental health problems remain without support. People often minimize their own symptoms and may think that their problems are not serious enough to require help. In addition to working toward systemic destigmatization and increased awareness of mental illness as a gradient of wellness, universities must undertake concrete actions to ensure that students have access to mental health services. The mere presence of these services is not enough to ensure their practical use. Students require transparent communication of campus resources for treating mental illness, and targeted encouragement from different actors to seek the support that they need.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue