Latest News

Student Life

Bathroom break

After four long years of an abusive relationship with McGill campus public restrooms, it’s time for me to speak out about the frustration, the repulsion, and the anger they have caused me. Too many times have I entered the facilities on the ground floor of Redpath across from the fishbowl and found myself wanting to just go home and douse myself in bleach. 

It’s undeniable that the McLennan-Redpath complex bathrooms are the most offensive on campus. Toilets covered in garbage bags, carelessly constructed out-of-order signs, and toilet paper that would even be deemed unfit for jail cells characterize each stall, from the most frequently visited in the basement outside of the Cybertheque, all the way up to the illogically miniscule facilities on the sixth floor. Discovering that only two of the five stalls in the basement are working while florescent lights scream at your eyes only enhances the usual library frustration levels to a new degree. And you can’t help but feel extremely uncomfortable on the sixth floor as anywhere from two to seven people are quietly waiting outside of the single stall listening to your every move. 

In other campus bathrooms, one can’t help but feel that there was an utter lack of logic when the blueprints were being drafted. Highlighter yellow doors in the Education Building to match the brick walls? Why not. Seven hundred and fifty stalls in the quiet basement of Leacock? Sure. Two-hundred students eat lunch at Bronfman every day? Two stalls will be fine. In all of these, though, the most striking facility I have come across is the women’s bathroom on the second floor of the Otto Maas Chemistry Building. Upon entry, the first thing I noticed was a formerly-used urinal covered up by the typical bathroom fix-it tool: the garbage bag. Regardless, I admired the soft pink tiling surrounding the entire bathroom, reminding me of some sort of ideal early’90s bathroom a teenage girl would have. 

Unfortunately, the widespread gender separation of washroom facilities has reduced my knowledge of men’s correspondence with McGill’s bathrooms to myth, hearsay, and stories of personal experience. One of the most prevalent bathroom commentaries is the story of “Sean Turner,” a student who had his name plastered over stalls across campus as a practical joke, sparking a widespread bathroom graffiti epidemic, and ultimately elevating this elusive character to campus celebrity status. That’s about as far as my knowledge goes for the men’s rooms, but I can assume they don’t have marble floors, gold sinks, magazine racks, or silk couches.

 McGill finds new and exciting ways to perplex us every day. Maybe the unruly bathrooms are just another one of those character-building exercises to prepare us for the big, bad, harsh world out there. If we have problems tolerating a stinky bathroom, then we will have problems in the professional world too, right? Maybe, maybe not, but one thing’s for sure: I won’t be returning to the second floor bathroom of the Otto Maas Chemistry Building anytime soon. 

Student Life

Becoming fond of ski-du-fond

Strolling past the McGill gym window last week was a deeply unsettling experience. The sight of weightlifters was worrying enough, with each lifter solemnly hulking over vast weights, staring themselves down in the mirror for lengths of time that would have impressed Narcissus. But what really disturbed me was the haunting spectacle of all the  treadmill runners—each runner looking both bored and determined, with earphones lassoing round their faces as they jogged mechanically, sweatily, and ceaselessly. They reminded me of hamsters in a wheel, wired up for lab tests. The saddest part was that it was actually a lovely day outside.

It got me thinking that there had to be better ways of exercising during the Montreal winter, another means of keeping all those midnight poutines from making themselves at home around one’s waistline. The best way to exercise, I’ve always thought, is outdoors with the fresh air and changing scenery for company. Yet the idea of outdoor exercise during the Montreal winter, for obvious reasons, appears preposterous: the golf courses, the tennis courts, and the football fields are all covered in thick layers of snow; the sidewalks are devilishly icy, and far too treacherous to run on with any kind of certainty. 

Fortunately, some family friends provided the simple, brilliant answer to my conundrum: cross-country skiing.  Or ski-du-fond, as the Quebecois call it. Extracting me from the warm comfort of the McGill bubble, my friends took me over to Gatineau National Park, just outside Ottawa, where we competed in the Gatineau Loppet, a 51 km ski marathon of 2,300 cross-country skiers. The abilities of the competitors ranged from Olympians of the sport to babies being dragged along by their parents in sleds. My fear, since I was a complete novice, was that I would end up finishing neck-and-neck with the latter group. But as we set off, my expectations changed; my fears became centered around whether I would finish at all. 

The beginning of the race was utter carnage. It was -14 degrees at the starting line, and we all set off in a sprint to warm ourselves up. There were over 2,000 of us skiing side-by-side, with the less able of us occasionally tumbling down into our fellow competitors’ paths. Survival instinct was not enough to keep myself from falling numerous times. In a moment of delirium, I began to see myself as a noble Lion King, doing his best against the odds not to tumble into the antelope stampede. It was a strange moment.

Then came the grind, which thankfully brought with it a bit more space to manoeuvre. Cross-country skiing is hard, especially over 51 kilometers, but it is rewarding in so many ways: the distance covered gives you a chance to glimpse some stunning views of mountains, lakes, trees, and wildlife. Getting up some of the hills, though a true test of grit which can make you want to call the rescue helicopter, is always worth it for the exhilarating downhills that follow. 

When I skied past the finish line after four and a half hours of non-stop skiing, with my legs as stiff as an Englishman’s upper lip, my first reaction was that I would never do this again; yet the moment I arrived back in Montreal, I missed it dearly. I was addicted.

Fortunately, I soon found out how easy it is to satisfy one’s addiction right here in Montreal. It is extraordinarily cheap and easy to rent a decent set of cross-country skis, boots, and poles from the McGill sports centre (just $10 for the whole day, $30 for the entire week), and give it a go on Mount Royal. It is the ideal place to learn. The pathways are not too steep, and it is incredibly beautiful round the Lac Aux Castors. The technique can be picked up quickly; it is pretty much the motion of ice skating—a motion Canadians are supposedly born with. Besides, according to Fitness Magazine, cross-country skiing even burns more calories per minute than running on a treadmill; what more could you ask for? So with an early spring on the horizon, and thoughts of beach volleyball beginning to take shape in our minds, take the opportunity to give cross-country skiing a try. Or, keep it in mind as a new activity to test out next winter.

News

Office of Sustainability launches Vision 2020 project

This winter, McGill’s Office of Sustainability launched a year-long project, Vision 2020, to ensure sustainability on campus and to promote student participation and awareness in sustainable initiatives. The idea behind this project is that interactive planning and intra-community collaborations will make long-term sustainability more effective and feasible. The project also presents an opportunity to work towards a common goal and reform how the administration consults students.

Consultation around sustainability issues has become increasingly strong in recent years on campus,” Maggie Knight, president of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), said. “Ideally this will provide an example of best practices in collectively shaping our campus. As with most projects, it could use some more people hours to get it to where it needs to be. However, there are several clever people working on this, so I have high hopes that it will produce strong results.”

The project will include an external consultant, Sustainability Solutions Group, offering its expertise in sustainability planning as well as a Vision 2020 Steering Committee which aims to draw a vast range of opinions and perspectives from McGill’s students, academic staff, operational staff, and administration.

Jim Nicell, McGill’s Associate Vice-Principal, will chair this Vision 2020 Steering Committee and jointly select members for this committee with SSMU Sustainability Coordinator and the Office of Sustainability.

I feel this is an idea with real potential,” Daniel Perrett, U1 geography, said of Vision 2020’s creation. “We need to be forward thinking as we engage with today’s environmental issues, such as the lack of awareness for appropriate means for composting on campus. There are obvious concerns regarding the long-term fruition of the project, but I feel that with sufficient leadership and student engagement, future McGill students can feel as passionate as we do about these projects.”

This project will involve three stages. The first involves a situational analysis of McGill’s on-campus sustainability performance, the second aims to set goals and objectives for sustainability within a 10-year timeframe, and the third will implement the concrete action items of a five-year action plan.

As a part of the project’s effort to achieve an open, consultative, and interactive planning process, students will be able to easily access the planning process and offer their opinions through online social mediums such as Facebook and IdeaScale, a website for posting and rating suggestions. Some popular ideas emerging on IdeaScale include “Encourage Sustainable Procurement Practices” and “Collaborative Student Research.”

This project matters for students because they are really getting a chance to share their opinions about what McGill will look like in the year 2020,” Sean Reginio, an intern at the Office of Sustainability, said.

Reginio added that members of the administration have proposed that, if successful, this initiative could become the new model for student consultation at McGill.

With all the events this year that have caused disagreement and turmoil on campus, I feel that a shared vision towards the future is something important to discuss,” Reginio said. “More importantly, though, I believe that this shared vision is possible, very possible. I truly believe in this community. It’s really time to collaborate.”

/- The first Vision 2020 event is a community conversation that will be held this Friday, March 16 in the RVC dining hall at 2:00 p.m. To contribute your ideas to Vision 2020, visit http://mcgillvision2020.ideascale.com /

News

SSMU hosts second annual Forum on Undergraduate Education

Last Tuesday, SSMU hosted its second annual Forum on Undergraduate Education . The forum allowed students to propose and discuss ideas about the role of undergraduate students at McGill.

This is the second year that we’ve had the event,” Emily Yee Clare, SSMU VP University Affairs, said. “It was started last year [in order to] create a forum where [students] would come together and talk about academic issues and how undergraduates [at McGill] are basically placed within a research-intensive environment.”

As a research-intensive university, McGill emphasizes the involvement of graduate students, who are able to engage in original academic research. This raises questions about how undergraduates fit into the process. Not having been properly trained to contribute to research, it may be difficult for them to contribute to the research.

The forum began with two public speakers who discussed how undergraduates can be more effectively integrated into the world of real academic research.

The opportunities for undergraduate students to have some engagement in research provides opportunities really to engage in [certain] fundamental [aspects of research] … that are really important outcomes of an undergraduate education, [and] can be difficult to get within the standard course structure,” speaker Laura Winer, Associate Director of Teaching and Learning Services, said.

Speakers discussed the necessity for undergraduate students to have the opportunity to engage in authentic academic research in order to develop certain skills necessary to make real contributions to future research.

When you engage in research, you understand how knowledge is created and refined,” Winer said. “People have to learn these skills and how to apply them in such a way where the fruits of their labour will have a certain validity.”

During the second part of the forum, students had the opportunity to put forward their own ideas about how McGill could better integrate the average student into more advanced levels of research. This raised topics such as the allocation of study space on campus, the quality of lectures, and the practicality of undergraduate degrees in general.

The forum differed in structure from the previous year’s. Rather than having a long period for students to make comments and ask questions to the speakers, students chose this year to sit at one of five tables, with each table focusing on a different issue of discussion while SSMU representatives wrote down points that were raised. After fifteen minutes, students were asked to move to another table to talk about a different issue. After three rotations, the forum was over.

We found that the format of round-table discussions … really allowed for students to have a good understanding of the issues,” Clare said. “It really allowed us to get some concrete ideas from students and allowed students to be very honest about how they felt about different issues.”

While the speakers focused specifically on how to promote undergraduate engagement in research, the table discussion period allowed for a wider range of issues to be discussed without drifting very far from the general theme of research and how it can be facilitated.

Although organizers of the event felt that they received a lot of information to work with in order to improve undergraduate research at McGill over the next year, some students who attended did not receive the impression that much is actually going to be done for them.

“It was nice to get my feelings out, but because I’m in my second [to] last year, I don’t feel like any of the things that I’m saying are really going to be effective for me,” Mathura Ravishankar, U2 arts and science student, said. “To be honest, we raised a lot of issues but did not come up with practical solutions.”

World

Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur

Capitol Hill Building ,Washington DC.
Capitol Hill Building ,Washington DC.

This is some dummy copy. You’re not really supposed to read this dummy copy, it is just a place holder for people who need some type to visualize what the actual copy might look like if it were real content.

If you want to read, I might suggest a good book, perhaps Hemingway or Melville. That’s why they call it, the dummy copy. This, of course, is not the real copy for this entry. Rest assured, the words will expand the concept. With clarity. Conviction. And a little wit.

In today’s competitive market environment, the body copy of your entry must lead the reader through a series of disarmingly simple thoughts.

All your supporting arguments must be communicated with simplicity and charm. And in such a way that the reader will read on. (After all, that’s a reader’s job: to read, isn’t it?) And by the time your readers have reached this point in the finished copy, you will have convinced them that you not only respect their intelligence, but you also understand their needs as consumers.

As a result of which, your entry will repay your efforts. Take your sales; simply put, they will rise. Likewise your credibility. There’s every chance your competitors will wish they’d placed this entry, not you. While your customers will have probably forgotten that your competitors even exist. Which brings us, by a somewhat circuitous route, to another small point, but one which we feel should be raised.

a, News

Lecture addresses benefits of grassroots education

Last Thursday, McGill’s Aboriginal Sustainability Program and the Sauvé Scholars Program hosted a talk by Louellyn White, who discussed her time studying the Akwesasne Freedom School as part of her PhD dissertation.

White, who is part Mohawk, is an assistant professor in First People’s studies at Concordia University. In the talk, she shared her experiences visiting the school and suggested that other schools could learn from its example of holistic cultural education. 

White first came to do research at the freedom school because of her interest in its Mohawk language immersion program. Soon, however, she became fascinated by the school’s unique approach to education. 

“The school itself is about so much more than language immersion,” White said. “It’s about cultural identity, self determination.”

The school is located on the Akwesasne reserve, which straddles New York State, Quebec, and Ontario. Akwesasne, which literally means “land where the partridge drums,” underwent a period of extreme unrest in the 1980s when a group of Mohawks set up a two-year barricade to protest the arrest of their people following protests against an imposed system of governance. 

During these two years, a group of parents decided to start their own school rather than send their children across the barricades to school. 

“They did it in the most grassroots of ways,” White said. “They used living rooms. They used garages. They used toolsheds.”

Today, 30 years later, the school still exists and has managed to stay true to its mission of providing an authentic Mohawk education.  

“The most unique thing about this school is that it’s self-sufficient,” White said.  “They’ve stuck with those original goals of self-determination and self-education.”

The school receives the majority of its money through fundraising. One of their biggest fundraisers is a quilt auction that can bring in as much as $20,000. The school owes much of its success to the dedication of parents and other members of the community. 

“There are parent committees for everything,” White said. “Parents have to be very, very committed … This is how it’s really sustained itself over the years … because it’s driven by this organic place. People are very immersed in it.”

The school itself is very small, with only 60-65 students at a given time, and goes from pre-kindergarten until grade eight. From Pre-K to grade six, all the students are in complete Mohawk immersion.  

During her time at the Akwesasne Freedom School, White learned that language is not the only way the school helps students regain their Mohawk identity.  

“When I talked to these students I said … ‘does language make you Mohawk?’ and the majority of them said ‘no,’ it’s ‘do I know my songs? Do I know my dances? Do I know my history?'” White said. “The language is important but it’s just one part of identity.”

White explained how the school cultivates values such as respect, responsibility, co-operation, leadership, and stewardship through this type of cultural education.

“I think other communities, non-native communities, can look at situations like this, at schools like this and see [a] culturally appropriate curriculum, grassroots experiential forms of education, [and] value systems,” White said. 

White spoke about the importance of self-governed Aboriginal education, especially in light of the fact that many Aboriginal people are still suffering from their experiences at residential schools. 

“Education is very important within the Aboriginal community,” Allan Vicaire, project co-ordinator on the Aboriginal Sustainability Project, said. “It is a topic that we continue to address to our youth, to educate oneself. I think that there is such a strong stance on education because of the realities that we live in.”

While the transition from Akwesasne to high school can be rough at first, White said that the freedom school students have better values and a stronger sense of their own identity than many students from other schools.  

David Searle, a McGill graduate in history and political science, in attendance enjoyed the talk, as did many others.  

“It’s really wonderful how they’ve integrated their local culture [and] their history into their education,” Searle said.

a, News

Administration introduces new MyCourses to staff

Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune

Last Thursday, McGill’s Office of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) held an event for staff to introduce the new MyCourses software, which will replace the current system on May 1, 2012. The old software, WebCT Vista, was implemented in 2005, but its vendor will no longer be supporting the outdated program as of Jan. 2013. 

Ghiliane Roquet, McGill’s Chief Information Officer, explained that this need for new software also presented opportunities to upgrade its features. A majority of the upgrades are intended to make it easier for instructors to disseminate information, from course-related materials to announcements.  

“We want to be able to provide [staff and students] with a stable environment … with at least a parity of what you have now—and hopefully a lot more,” Roquet said.  

The software selection process included software demonstrations on campus and opportunities for staff and student feedback. Finally, Desire2Learn (D2L), a Canadian e-learning company located in Waterloo, Ontario, was signed to a 3-year renewable license to supply McGill with a new version of the MyCourses software. 

Some new features of the software include a completely new look, the introduction of widgets, and a revised discussion board that can link up to specific content on MyCourses. The discussion board is the most used feature on MyCourses by students, tallying nearly 33 million hits per semester. There is also a new option for staff and students to have a display picture that will then show up on discussion boards and class listings. 

Elan Weinstock, a U3 student in the faculty of management and part-time employee with McGill’s IT services, described the two features that he is most looking forward to using: its central calendar and the mobile platform. The mobile platform, he argued, will ensure that students will be overall better informed. 

“When an announcement comes out … it will be sent to me [in] real time to my cell phone,” Weinstock said.  

He added that students will be able to opt into that feature. 

Additionally, the software’s calendar application will now make note of students’ assignments, exams, and quizzes. Students will then be able to “subscribe” to their MyCourses calendars and import them into their personal calendar applications, such as iCal or Google Calendars.  

Staff are working hard to ensure that the software is operational on schedule. The 4,000 courses that take place during the typical school year—fall and spring semesters—are currently undergoing migration to the new interface, at an average pace of two and a half hours of labour per course. 

“There has been a lot of work involved with converting everything from the old system to the new system,” Roquet said. “All courses for the summer have already been migrated.”

The outlook for the software’s use is positive. The staff and few students who attended the event were generally very receptive of the presentation. 

“It’s a time saver,” Carolyn Samuel, a professor in the faculty of education and the McGill Writing Centre, said. 

Provost Anthony Masi, who Roquet referred to as “the sponsor of the project,” emphasized the impact that the new software could make on the McGill community. The switch, he emphasized, is first and foremost in the interest of students. 

“We want to put an effort on the ‘student-centeredness’ of this institution,” Masi said. “We produce new knowledge, and we disseminate it, and that requires that we stay at the front of technological innovation.”

“It should enhance the learning experience of students in all faculties,” he added. 

Students like Weinstock are optimistic about the software. 

“In the test environment, it worked fine,” Weinstock said. “I am expecting it to work really well.”

a, News

AMUSE reaches tentative agreement with admin

On Feb. 22, McGill University and the Association of McGill University Support Employees (AMUSE) announced that they had come to a tentative agreement on both the economic and non-economic issues affecting casual workers at the university. The proposed agreement, which needs to be approved by a ratification vote at AMUSE’s next major meeting, includes provisions for wage increases, paid overtime, and sick leave, as well as modifications to the existing hiring and firing process for casual labourers on campus.

According to a press release by McGill University, this will be the first collective agreement for AMUSE, which represents roughly 1,500 casual labourers on campus. These negotiations took a year to complete.

“Something that we keep in mind is that a lot of the advantage to holding a casual position is that it can be a short-term thing … and you’re looking for flexibility in that job a lot of the time,” Jaime Maclean, current president of AMUSE, said.  “But there’s also a lot of inequality between positions on campus, and without a labour union to police the working conditions of their members, an employer can easily take advantage of their employees.”

Maclean, however, was quick to state that while McGill hadn’t been taking advantage of their casual employees, there were still problems in wage equality and job demands that emerged some years ago, leading directly to the creation of AMUSE and the beginning of collective bargaining.

“While there are obviously people who just work once a week and don’t mind that, there are a large number of people who work full-time at McGill in the same jobs as MUNACA workers,” Farid Attar, former president of AMUSE, noted. Attar is also a member of the bargaining team that negotiated the agreement with McGill.

Attar added that AMUSE aims to maintain this flexibility for the employees who benefit from it, while also increasing job security, benefits, and general working conditions for employees who have put four years of their life into their work.

AMUSE’s bargaining committee was elected at their first general assembly in Nov. 2010, whereupon they attempted to draft the terms of the initial agreement. It wasn’t until March 2011 that serious back-and-forth negotiation began. Bargaining on the non-economic issues continued throughout the year until they were finally resolved in Dec. 2011. On economic issues, however, bargaining quickly reached a stalemate, requiring both parties to call for conciliation.

Altar explained that conciliation brings in the government as a neutral third party, in order to introduce a fresh perspective and restart negotiations. 

In this agreement, some of the benefits gained in the non-economic sphere included written contracts, paid sick days for full-time workers with six-month contracts, priority for AMUSE members for contract renewals and promotions, and paid overtime.

More thought was put into considering wage increases, with the membership of AMUSE categorized into three main groups, each of whom are going to see minimum wage increases under this agreement, as well as minimum yearly increases, with the first increase scheduled for the signing of the agreement. For those workers who are already paid above the minimums mandated by the agreement, there is no danger of losing wages.

“People have to come to the ratification vote,” Attar stressed. “Ultimately it’s not the bargaining team who decides, it’s the membership that gave us the mandate to bargain with McGill­—if you want those wage increases, if you want those job securities, you’ll have to come to the ratification vote … during that time, we’ll answer all the questions they have.”

The ratification vote for AMUSE’s collective bargaining agreement is tentatively scheduled for mid-March, with one session to take place in the afternoon and one at night.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue