Latest News

Opinion

Endorsements for Thursday’s GA motions

McGill Tribune

Resolution Re: The Society’s Invesments – YES

This resolution would amend the Students’ Society’s bylaws to include information regarding its investments in corporate shares and government bonds. As SSMU’s counsel has advised, this is necessary in order to bring the corporation in line with Quebec law.

Resolution Re: Biking on Campus – NO

If passed, this resolution would mandate SSMU to investigate whether bikes on campus are dangerous, to lobby the administration to reinstate biking on campus, and to look for ways to make biking safer. The administration made it clear in the Fall that they have no intention of reversing this policy, and no General Assembly motion or student-conducted research will change this. Also, it’s doubtful that SSMU has either the resources to effectively study this issue or improve bicycle safety.

Resolution Re: The Improvement of the SSMU — NO

Citing concerns with SSMU’s administrative structure, this resolution proposes that the organization commission an independent study by an outside researcher, preferably a student, to investigate the SSMU’s efficiency and business practices. While we’d love to see SSMU operate more efficiently, we’re concerned about hiring a student to conduct the study. While student researchers can produce good work, this particular project is in an area where it’s unlikely that any student would have the expertise required to conduct a complete, useful analysis.

 

Resolution Re: The Appointment of McKinsey & Co. — NO

This resolution proposes that SSMU oppose the appointment of McKinsey & Co., a consulting group that McGill recently announced will provide services pro bono to the university, as well as the appointment of one of the company’s administrators to the McGill’s Board of Governors. Many of the whereas clauses, however, in this resolution are simplistic and devoid of context. Most corporations as large as McKinsey have taken actions that, when cited out of context, may reflect poorly on the company. This does not make the corporation inherently evil and certainly does not mean we shouldn’t avail ourselves of their services, particularly when they are offered for free.

Resolution Re: Use of McGill’s Name — YES

If passed, this resolution would mandate SSMU to continue to fight for the rights of student groups to use the McGill name in their titles and would ban the university from using any of these groups in their own publications if no progress is made. Many clubs and services on campus, including the Tribune, have recently faced problems stemming from the university’s restrictions on the use of its name and this resolution is a step in the right direction.

 

Opinion

This I believe?

“When you believe in things that you don’t understand then you suffer. Superstition ain’t the way.”

—Stevie Wonder

The university can be a hotbed for superstition. When you fill people’s heads with speculative ideas that are presented as facts, things will always get messy. Facts and metaphysical truths, when taken as sacred, become superstitions. When we make a professor more sacred than a book, or a book more sacred than a friend, or a friend more sacred than a lover, we are playing with fire. Making something sacred is a problem because when you don’t understand, when your gut tells you something is fishy, you can simply say: “Nope, better believe the preacher, doctor, monk, parent, novelist, counsellor, lover, professor, magician, swami, etc.” We’re addicted to this. Easy answers equal distraction from difficulties on the home front. We’re not in “the real world,” we have no real problems.

True, we want to help the world, which is a good thing. But it’s not a pass for us to be high and mighty with problems. When you don’t understand why you feel the way you do, you risk the loss of your gut, or your intuitions. You say: “There must be something wrong with my abilities,” or you look for some bigger existential problem to chew on endlessly. Or, you pay $5,000 dollars to fly to Africa to feed children, when the real problem is almost always at home. There are starving children in Montreal, too, and your boyfriend and parents have nothing to do with Nietzsche.

We sometimes tend to believe that when there are problems with us or with the world, that these problems are us or the world. We don’t trust that we understand the situation well enough to deal with it. It’s all very mystical and unreflective. The image of the superstitious person used to be the ignorant believer, the person who “took the red pill.” But the young thinker is just as susceptible. When things get difficult in school, we know that we can get a mental health note or an aderol. When we feel perplexed, we know we can read “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” or Plato. But these “answers” don’t make our “souls weigh more” at the end of it; they don’t make us better than anyone else.

Do we really have to rely on vague diagnoses, esoteric intellectuals, and wonder drugs to supplement our “feeble” minds? Some more relevant questions might be: Am I treating my roommates well? How’s grandma? Why does Brad’s room always smell funny?

When it comes down to it, belief comes from instinct and intuition, those vague and detestable, intangible things. We can’t read about the backs of our own heads.

As an exercise, ask yourself what you really got out of that literature or philosophy class, and then compare it to what you might get out of a Pixar movie or the advice of a good friend. Ask yourself why you dismiss the possibility of a Pixar movie being a source of real wisdom.

Facts, diagnoses, intellectuals and leather-bound books can often just provoke superstition, though they may add to our university street cred. That’s not to say that they’re always bad, they just have their place somewhere behind things we really do understand—friends, family and our sense of self; all those silly rank and file values.

Sports

Rethinking hockey’s age-old prejudices

Sometimes sports are just sports. Like the Super Bowl this weekend, they can be fun to watch and don’t mean much. Sometimes though, sports serve as a platform for a greater cause. I’m reminded of this because the day before the Super Bowl, February 5, was the one-year anniversary of Brendan Burke’s tragic and untimely death. Burke died skidding on an icy Indiana road and crashing into an oncoming Ford truck, but his unique and unusual legacy is still felt strongly in the National Hockey League community and beyond.

Burke was a varsity goaltender in high school, but quit the team before graduation. He went on to become the student manager of the University of Miami hockey team. Until November 2009, his only real claim to widespread hockey fame was as the son of the more famous Burke: Brian, the current GM of the Maple Leafs and architect of the 2007 Stanley Cup winning Anaheim Ducks.

Brendan became famous in his own right, partly still due to his connection to his father, but also as a gay advocate in hockey. Growing up in the world of hockey, which can be a homophobic culture at times, Brendan quit his high school team for fear his teammates would find out he was gay. Since coming out in his sophomore year at the University of Miami and finding tremendous support from both his family and hockey team, Brendan decided to spread his story.

Brendan’s efforts, impressive as they were, won’t be remembered in the same way as Jackie Robinson breaking the colour barrier or Muhammad Ali declaring himself a pacifist, simply because Burke was no star of the game. But for every Robinson, for every Ali, there’s a precursor, someone of lesser stature who paves the way forward. In baseball, 60 years before Robinson took the field, there was Moses Fleetwood Walker, a middling catcher for the now-defunct American Association, the real first African-American to play professional baseball.

Still, Burke’s experience and the media reaction it spawned shows that the time for another watershed moment in sports is drawing near. Soon, there will likely be an openly gay athlete in one of the “Big Four” (NHL, MLB, NBA, and NFL). And, even though hockey is behind in many ways (no retired hockey player has ever come out, the locker room culture is often perceived as homophobic), my money is still on the NHL, Canada’s league, to produce the first.

There have been numerous gay athletes in baseball, hockey, football, and basketball, and some have even come out publicly after retiring, but none were openly gay during their playing careers. Glenn Burke, no relation to Brian and Brendan, the man known for popularizing the high-five after home runs in baseball, has said that both his teammates and team management were aware of his sexual orientation, and that this played a role in prematurely ending his career. Still, it’s unclear in Glenn’s case to what degree knowledge of his sexuality was public.

It’s possible that a hockey player will go much further than Glenn Burke ever did, and will come out, not only to teammates and management, but to the entire media circus. It’ll be tough to do, and only a superior player or a person of superior character will be able to do it—the former because he won’t have to fear losing his job, and the latter because he’ll take the risk for a greater cause. Hockey players, for all their “pugnacity, testosterone, truculence, and belligerence” are still mostly Canadian kids. And my assumption for Canadians is a higher degree of tolerance than found elsewhere. As recently out journalist Steve Buckley said in an interview with The Good Men Project, “[R]eading all these emails in the last couple weeks, everybody’s got a lesbian sister. Everyone’s got a nephew who is gay. Everyone’s got somebody in their lives who’s gay. And it’s not a question. People say, ‘Well, can a Major League baseball player be out? Would his teammates accept him?’ And that misses the point. It’s not a question of whether those teammates will accept him. It’s a question of whether those teammates have already accepted other people in their lives who are gay or lesbian or transgendered.”

Furthermore, Sean Avery, widely regarded as one of the bigger meatheads in professional hockey, has expressed on record his solidarity with any youths who love hockey but are afraid to come out to their teammates. If Avery can show this kind of tolerance, anybody can. I have a lot of faith in Canada, and in hockey as a result, to follow in the trail Brendan began to blaze and bring down the next major prejudice in sports.

Sports

McGill looks toward playoffs after disappointing finale

Robert Smith
Robert Smith

The McGill Martlets (10-10) let lead after lead slip as they fell 3-0 (21-25, 20-25, 22-25) to the fifth ranked University of Laval Rouge-et-Or (17-3) on Saturday night at Love Competition Hall. The Martlets held early leads in each of the three sets but were unable to withstand the relentless Laval attack.

It was the final regular season game for the Martlets and final regular season home game in the five-year careers of power right side Amy Graham and middle Kelsey Irwin, who leaves McGill with an all-time team record in kill percentage.

The Martlets started extremely strong, leading the first set 14-10 as Geneviève Plante’s serve aced the Rouge-et-Or twice. However, Laval stormed back with a 15-7 run to close out the first set 25-21.

“We started off pretty strong but I think the nerves got the best of us,” said Irwin who was tied with a team leading 10 kills.

Despite losing the first set, the Martlets kept their composure and jumped out to a 6-2 lead in the second set. But again, they let the lead slip away. Laval’s strong front line overpowered the Martlets as Marie-Christine Mondor led the Rouge-et-Or on a 13-3 run that gave Laval a commanding 15-9 lead. Laval won the second set 25-20 and Mondor led the game with 16 kills.

The first point of the third set was incredible as great defence on both sides kept the rally alive before McGill won the point. An emphatic spike three points later by Emily Kyte, who also finished with 10 kills, gave the Martlets a 3-1 lead. They were able to extend the gap to 14-10 but again failed to hold on. Laval took their first lead of the set 16-15 and never gave it up. In fitting fashion, Mondor closed out the game with a powerful spike to give the Rouge-et-Or a 25-22 set and straight sets victory.

It was an emotional game for the team, Graham, and Irwin. Irwin has continually improved throughout her career to eventually become one of McGill’s better players in recent memory.

“She started from nowhere and really progressed through the whole thing,” said Martlets Head Coach Rachèle Béliveau. “She is a very good competitor, she loves competition.”

While Irwin and Graham’s last career home game did not go as planned, they have the upcoming playoffs to look forward to. With the win, Laval has earned a bye, while McGill plays the University of Montreal in a best of three semi-final. The winner of that match will play in the final against Laval. Because the CIS tournament will be hosted by the Rouge-et-Or, three teams from Quebec will qualify for Nationals. As a result, the loser of the Montreal-McGill clash will face last place Sherbrooke in a best of three competition to determine the last qualifier.

“Tonight wasn’t like we expected to be honest,” said Irwin. “Whenever you’re playing Laval you have to fight really hard if you want to win … We have to be really, really aggressive at the net. We’re playing Montreal next weekend. They’re a good hard hitting team and if we want to win we just have to hit a lot harder.”

Béliveau stressed that the team has already begun preparing for the playoffs.

“We’re going to be ready,” she said. “We worked on some things tonight in preparation for the playoffs. We asked the hitters to hit hard no matter what. We didn’t want to give any free balls and hit as hard as possible all the time and I think we did apply it today.”

As the playoffs begin next weekend, the Martlets hope to avenge their three regular season losses to Montreal and wrap up a berth in the CIS tournament. McGill plays at the University of Montreal on Friday night before returning home on Saturday at 6 p.m. If the series is tied one game apiece, a tie breaker will be held at Montreal on Sunday afternoon.

Sports

The King is back, the Cavs are not

I like to consider myself an expert when it comes to recognizing futility and hopelessness in sports. Each season, every team I cheer for seems determined to find a way to be increasingly awful. But despite my familiarity with last place finishes and double digit losing streaks, I have never seen anything like this season’s Cleveland Cavaliers.  

The Cavaliers just set an NBA record with their 24th consecutive loss—almost a third of an entire season. But what is most impressive about this streak is how the Cavs are losing; they’re getting annihilated. Earlier this month the L.A. Lakers were a basket away from doubling Cleveland’s score, winning 112-57. In their next two games the Cavs lost by 22 and 28 points. If you add that up, Cleveland lost by 104 points over a three-game stretch—pretty embarrassing. The Washington Generals had a better chance of beating the Harlem Globetrotters.

But what really shows how bad the Cavs are is their 15-point loss to the Toronto Raptors on January 5. The Raptors suck; just a week after the victory, Toronto went on a 13-game losing streak of their own. Losing by 15 points to the Raptors is like losing to Adam Morrison in a beard-off—it just shouldn’t happen.

What’s remarkable about the Cavaliers’ downfall is how quickly it happened. Last season the Cavs led the league with a 61-21 record, but this year their incompetence is unrivaled. The only difference is LeBron James’s departure. Despite James winning two MVP awards, a scoring title and making the NBA Finals, the train wreck that is the Cavs season may be the best example of just how great (and I mean all-time great) a basketball player LeBron is.

The Cavs team is virtually the same as last season minus King James. Let’s say this Cavs team breaks their streak soon and improves. Right now they have an 8-43 record; it would be a stretch for them to win 13 games this year. That means LeBron, more or less, is the difference in Cleveland winning 48 games. Sure, there are other factors, but that is a ridiculous change in wins with only one star player being subtracted.

If you took Kobe Bryant off the Lakers or Tim Duncan off the Spurs do you think their teams would start losing at an unprecedented rate? Of course not. Even when Michael Jordan retired in 1993 the Bulls were able to win an impressive 55 games. James may not be better than Bryant, Duncan, or Jordan, but he’s always criticized for not winning a championship in Cleveland. However, with Cleveland’s struggles this year it seems as though James’s Cavs teams were winning at an amazing rate despite him being surrounded by a bunch of scrubs.

As the season progresses and the Cavs continue to look hopeless, sit back and enjoy. Enjoy how comically bad the season is becoming for Cleveland because it really is quite a show. But more importantly, you should appreciate LeBron for his talents.

This past Thursday LeBron put on one of the best basketball performances I’ve ever seen. He scored 51 points, shot 17-25, grabbed 11 rebounds and dished out eight assists. What was most impressive is how effortless it all looked. When a player has such an incredible game it often feels as if they are playing above themselves and getting somewhat lucky. With LeBron, it looked routine. He didn’t force shots (in fact he hit his first 11 attempts), played within the offence and was essentially unstoppable. This is what he is capable of when he plays his best. Moreover, it was not some fluky performance of a lifetime but the ninth 50-point performance of his career.

It’s an unfortunate reality that one’s character does not equate with one’s success in the sporting world. As fans we want those players who we can relate to and who we like to succeed. However, this often clouds our judgment and obscures reality. I’m not saying you should cheer for LeBron or even like him, but if you’re ignoring how amazing LeBron is because of his selfish and often arrogant actions during his career, you’re missing an opportunity to witness of one the most incredible athletes of all time play basketball at a phenomenal level. Don’t believe me? Ask the Cavs.

Arts & Entertainment

Making sense of contemporary British theatre

Alice Walker
Alice Walker

When trying to describe the underlying message of TNC Theatre’s newest production, Attempts on Her Life, the odds are stacked against you. Attempts on Her Life, directed by Laura Freitag, is the best-known work by modern British playwright Martin Crimp. Divided into 16 episodic segments, the play is a mosaic of disparate scenes and encounters within which the only unifying thread is a female figure: Anne, or sometimes Annie. In her director’s note, Freitag writes that this figure is “the perfect litmus test for [the play’s] narratives—denying them closure and determinacy while making them individualized and palpable.” In other words, the character gives the audience something to focus on amidst the chaos of the rest of the play.

Attempts on Her Life is “the skeleton of a script,” according to Freitag, written in unbroken prose, without assigning specific lines or roles to the actors. Accordingly, the director is given a great deal of leeway when choosing the number of actors and assigning their roles. Freitag’s cast of six (Arlen Aguayo Stewart, Marko Djurdjic, Max Lanocha, Cory Lipman, Norah Paton, and Joy Ross-Jones) brings an array of characters to life onstage: terrorists and art critics, children and adults, particle physicists and porn stars. The cast’s effectiveness is evident; the actors are able to both maintain distinct voices and mesh well within the ensemble. The play is staged so that each scene begins with its number and title projected onto a cloth screen at the rear of the stage. While hurried costume changes are made, an answering machine message is played to the audience. The 16 events trace out no recognizable narrative structure. There’s a sexy disco dance number, a sing-a-long in which Djurdjic plays the banjo, and a sales pitch for a car called “The New Anny” in both English and, perhaps, Russian. Theres also  partial nudity.

The play has all the right ingredients. If it were not for borderline traumatic scenes—a military checkpoint, an interrogation, an account of a rural village torn apart by war—the performance would be almost too much fun. The explicitly political aspect of Crimp’s writing, however, forces you to take it seriously. Under all the frivolity, there’s no doubt that Crimp is trying to convey something important to the audience, albeit in an unconventional fashion.  

The overall inability to fully explain the performance demands that we make sense of Attempts on Her Life ourselves. “Western theatre does a very good job of disempowering the spectator because they can’t assert themselves,” Freitag says. “But I think, in a play like this, the spectator is empowered because they become meaning-manufacturing parts of the show.” Seeing this play is an attempt in itself—you can’t watch it without trying to decipher it the whole time.

Attempts On Her Life runs at TNC theatre, Morrice Hall, Feb 9- 12 at 8 p.m. Tickets are $6, email [email protected] for details.

Arts & Entertainment

Glee-ful copyright wars

At this point in the ratings game, there’s almost nobody left who doesn’t know what Glee is. The show averages an astronomical number of viewers and has turned its cast into stars. With the second season came an even wider audience and a more devoted fan base, and Fox has already ordered a third season. Of course, the show hasn’t been without its criticism, but Glee has won every battle of sheer popularity. The critics are, for the most part, ignored.

A recent public blowout, however, between the show’s creator and rock band Kings of Leon brought to light another ballyhooed aspect of the show, and it’s one worth mentioning. The story is this: Glee approached Kings of Leon sometime in the not-so-distant past about using their song “Use Somebody” on the show, and the band turned down the request claiming they had never seen Glee while simultaneously insisting that lending their song to the pop culture phenomenon would be akin to “selling out.” In a recent interview in “The Hollywood Reporter,” Glee creator Ryan Murphy was quoted saying, “Fuck you, Kings of Leon. They’re self-centred assholes, and they missed the big picture. They missed that a seven-year-old kid can see someone close to their age singing a Kings of Leon song, which will maybe make them want to join a glee club or pick up a musical instrument.” The dispute was further aggravated when Kings of Leon band member Nathan Followill tweeted a homophobic insult to Ryan Murphy and suggesting he get over the whole debacle. In the end, Murphy spoke out about the homophobia and Followill apologized and retracted his quote.  

The whole public battle between Murphy and Kings of Leon is nothing if not childish and downright embarrassing. Murphy acted like an immature toddler when he blasted Kings of Leon for their refusal to let Glee use their song, and came off like a pompous windbag when he insisted Glee was some sort of musical miracle. Despite this, the villain in the story ended up being Followill thanks to his homophobic taunt. Overall, nobody wins in a public drama like this one.  

The feud highlights these questions: Are artists selling out by licensing their songs to Glee? And how should rejection be dealt with? Musicians have right to decide who can cover their songs, and while the definition of selling out is murky at best, if that’s how an artist feels about Glee, there’s really no reason they shouldn’t be able to turn down good money if they feel it will maintain their integrity as an artist. After all, once Glee gains control of a song, they are veritably free to do with it what they wish, and this can be a terrifying situation for an artist who has worked hard to make their music. That being said, Glee brings many songs to a broad audience and can definitely help popularize an artist should they choose to allow the show access to their catalogue.  

There’s no right or wrong in the decision to allow Glee to use songs, and there’s no reason artists should be disrespected for turning the show down. However, should artists refuse to allow Glee to use their material, it’s completely unprofessional to make things personal. Glee will be here for a while, and many artists will give their songs to the show by the time it ends. The show’s fans are appreciative for the new versions of their favourite songs and for exposure to songs they never knew existed. In the end, the original songs still exist and artists are allowed to keep their songs intact should they so choose, so does anybody really get hurt?

Arts & Entertainment

Under the sea ain’t so pretty anymore

Sanctum 3D, based on true events, begins with a team of divers exploring an undiscovered cave system in the South Pacific’s Esa-ala Caves. When warnings of a tropical storm begin, the team is swiftly thrown into a spiral of disasters that trap them in the caves. With no way to escape from the top, the team, left with few supplies, is forced to find another way out through the cave system.  

This movie has James Cameron’s stamp all over it, literally and visually. The first shot of the film is obviously a nod to Cameron’s early critically acclaimed underwater thriller, The Abyss. Director Alister Grierson brazenly mimics that infamous image of the shadowy figure of a diver superimposed on a bright white light, leaving no room for creativity or imagination.

The film uses Avatar‘s film technology to create the most claustrophobic film you will ever see. The story follows the lead of Frank (Richard Roxburgh), a master diver leading the expedition into the unknown underwater cave system. Things take a turn for the worse when a tropical storm suddenly takes them by surprise, trapping them inside. Frank, his teenage son Josh (Rhys Wakefield), and their billionaire sponsor, Carl (Ioan Gruffudd) and his fiancée are forced to find a w.ay out through the treacherous caves. The trapped divers show all the typical traits of stock characters: the rich dude, the rich dude’s beautiful but mean fiancée, the loyal and humourous best friend, the spoiled child, and the tough-as-nails father.  

Despite a lacklustre plot, the close-ups and the turning-360 shots were beautifully done, effectively conveying the entrapment of the divers. Claustrophobia hasn’t been more brilliantly conveyed since Hitchcock. The 3D effect heightens the illusion of literally pushing the screen towards your eyes and forcing you to experience the terrors that ensue. When Frank loses his focus and is trapped under water with no breathing apparatus, the spinning camera action imposes panic on your unwilling heart. These effects combined with the beautiful scenic shots help make the film bearable.  

With underdeveloped acting and dialogue, acting veteran Roxburgh and newcomer Wakefield are able to breathe some life into their generic characters, revealing some heartfelt moments and development in their on-screen relationship. As Frank’s trusted friend, Dan Wyllie almost flawlessly executes his role as the comic relief. The subtle humour in the film is like an oxygen tank that replenishes the lungs, since the better half of the film will be spent holding your breath indefinitely.  

Sanctum 3D is worth the mere thrill of experiencing the realities of cave diving in unchartered waters. Proceed with caution and don’t forget to breathe.

Arts & Entertainment

Bawk-bawk-bawk, hak-hak-hak, aka dah-da-da-DAH

Julian Haber
Julian Haber

When I read the tagline for Geordie Theatre’s MöcShplat—”Shakespeare … in a language you can finally understand”—I assumed they were being ironic. But this clown version of Macbeth, told only in gibberish, was not only easy to understand, it also made the plot and themes accessible for the Shakespeare novice and expert alike.  

Despite the clowns, MöcShplat—which pokes fun at drunks, fornication, and murder—is not a show for children. With a cast of four clowns, played by Marcel Jeannin, Michel Perron, John Sheridan, and Danielle Desormeaux, and directed by Alain Goulem, the play is the product of a series of workshops and presentations that emerged in the late 1990s. Working collaboratively on gags and the creation of an original language, the group of seasoned actors is a joy to watch. With a language of their own and an adept use of mime and gesture, they weave their story so effectively that any previous knowledge of Macbeth is unnecessary. Yet MöcShplat also caters to the Shakespeare lover in the audience. Those familiar with Macbeth will laugh uproariously at the clown rendition of “Is this a dagger I see before me?” Lady Macbeth’s “Unsex me here,” and one of my personal favourites, “To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow.”

The cast should be commended for their energy, precision and skill. Highlights included Perron’s Godfather-like Quindönk (Duncan), Sheridan’s fight between two clowns in the wings, and Desormeaux’s incredible facial expressions. All the actors have perfect comedic timing, and the music in the show gives their movements a dance-like precision. This, combined with the clash of their clown personalities and the absurdity of the costumes and props, makes MöcShplat sidesplitting from beginning to end.  

The most impressive part of the performance is how well it displays themes of the Shakespeare classic. Director Alain Goulem suggests that clowns, with their childlike desires to have one thing one moment and another thing the next, makes them the perfect vessels to explore Shakespearean themes. This is evident through Jeannin’s MöcShplat (Macbeth), who hits all the marks of this complex character, demonstrating his shifts from ambition, fear, and nobility in a way that’s not only believable, but also identifiable; the best theatrical device to this purpose was the use of red yarn as blood. After killing Quindönk (King Duncan), a gruesomely funny scene that only a clown could pull off, MöcShplat remains covered in bits of red string for the rest of the play. As the play continues, bits of red string are dropped here and there, so by the end, just like Laädie’s (Lady M) hands, MöcShplat, the stage, and even some of the audience members are covered in blood—a fitting metaphor for the bloodthirsty story.  

Montreal is just the beginning for MöcShplat. Plans include touring across Canada, then hopefully continuing to Edinburgh and Europe. One can expect big things from this show—the great energy and thought that brought about its inception certainly indicates a bright future. These happy, horny, cruel, drunk, scared, and silly creatures offer a much needed ray of sunshine in these cold months.

MöcShplat runs at the Centaur Theatre, Feb. 12, 7 p.m. & 9:30 p.m., and Feb. 13 at 3 p.m. & 7 p.m. $17.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue