Latest News

Arts & Entertainment

If your vagina could talk, what would it say?

Alice Walker

From February 10-12, V-Day McGill brings their 10th anniversary edition of Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues to the stage. Directed by Claire Hughes, this year’s performance features 16 cast members presenting monologues based on true stories of women throughout the world.  

The original Vagina Monologues are based on interviews with over 200 women, and touch on topics including humourous personal anecdotes, poignant tales of self-discovery, and heartbreaking stories of those who have survived sexual abuse. V-Day McGill is an organization dedicated to fighting gender-based violence, and all proceeds of the show will go towards the charities Women of Haiti, Heads & Hands, the Native Women’s Shelter of Montreal and Shield of Athena.  

This year, V-Day McGill decided to include a monologue in their production entitled “They Beat the Girl out of my Boy… or So They Tried,” based on the experience of a trans person. The monologue was published in Ensler’s book but hasn’t been performed at McGill before. Assistant director Ryan Thom says that V-Day McGill added their own dialogue to the piece in order to make it more inclusive of trans-people.  

A recurring theme in the production has been the inclusion of a Spotlight Campaign monologue that highlights a particular current issue affecting women. This year, the “Spotlight monologue” focuses on the plight of women and girls in the aftermath of the earthquake in Haiti, as thousands live in high-risk situations where they face the danger of sexual assault and rape, without a supportive infrastructure to assist them. The profits of the Spotlight Campaign go towards funding three safe houses—each with an office of legal assistance for survivors of violence.

The performance also features the stories of Japanese comfort women, female survivors of the Bosnian and Kosovan concentration camps, homeless women, young girls, and even senior citizens.  

“Due to the breadth of issues covered in the performance, the topics are accessible to many people, and are conversations we could have as peers, teens, and young adults,” says producer Nadiya Gaswami.  

Interspersed with humourous monologues like “What Would Your Vagina Wear?” and “Vagina Happy Facts,” there lies the sobering harsh reality of the dangers that women face every day in monologues dealing with violence, social stigma, and alienation.

As a lead-up to this year’s production, V-Day McGill has also hosted a series of professor-led discussions on gender, sexuality, and reproductive health, covering topics like “Feminism and Pornography” and “The Contextualization of Gay Marriage.”

The Vagina Monologues is a medley of touching stories that are both easily relatable and eye opening. If you aren’t swayed by the large charitable donations that will come out of the performance, the actors and the atmosphere and meaning behind the show should certainly seal the deal.

 

V-Day McGill’s Vagina Monologues runs February 10-12 in Leacock 132. Tickets are $10 for students, $15 for adults.

Arts & Entertainment

The Tribune weighs in on 2011 Grammy picks

Best Pop Vocal Album:

My World 2.0 — Justin Bieber

I Dreamed a Dream — Susan Boyle

The Fame Monster — Lady GaGa

Battle Studies — John Mayer

Teenage Dream — Katy Perry

Pop music was everywhere this past year, whether you liked it or not. Although Perry’s nomination may have sprouted from her current hit singles, she’s not favoured. We predict that Lady Gaga is finally going to get what she’s been itching for—more recognition from the Grammys—and will take the Pop Vocal Album category this year.

 

Album of the Year:

The Suburbs — Arcade Fire

Recovery — Eminem

Need You Now — Lady Antebellum

The Fame Monster — Lady GaGa

Teenage Dream — Katy Perry

Everything great about pop music is in The Fame Monster: catchy hooks, direct lyrics, and the best production the industry has to offer. Techno and house music fans knew long ago that the synthesizer created catchy riffs, but the polished, 21st century Gaga persona is responsible for bringing synth-pop to the Top 40. Her songs are completely over the top, absurdly theatrical, and consistently powerful. No doubt The Suburbs has a more intelligent message behind it, but there’s something to be said for Lady Gaga’s sheer entertainment value.

 

Song of the Year:

“Beg Steal or Borrow”  — Ray LaMontagne

“Forget You” —  Cee-Lo Green

“The House That Built Me”  — Miranda Lambert

“Love the Way You Lie”  — Eminem Feat. Rihanna

“Need You Now” — Lady Antebellum  

Cee-Lo Green’s stroke of genius was writing a vengeful breakup song that’s as rude as it is playful. For most of us, it’s refreshing to hear a song about an ex that isn’t depressing, and the song is catchy enough to get stuck in our parents’ heads too. Whether they choose to sing the lyrics out loud with us or just mutter them under their breath, the song raises the same moral conundrum that’s existed since the days of Elvis Presley: Is this artist considered controversial, or are my kids just cooler than me?  

 

Record of the Year:

“Nothin’ on You” — B.o.B. Feat. Bruno Mars

“Love the Way You Lie”  — Eminem Feat. Rihanna

“Forget You” —  Cee-Lo Green

“Empire State of Mind”  — Jay-Z Feat. Alicia Keys

“Need You Now” — Lady Antebellum

Some of the most popular songs of the year are featured in this category, making it tough to predict. “Empire State of Mind” can be ruled out as its time on the top has clearly been forgotten; it should have been recognized at last year’s ceremony, considering the song was released in 2009. The award could easily go to Eminem and Rihanna, but “Forget You” is also loved by the Recording Academy. We’re going to predict “Nothin’ on You,” for an extremely successful debut single from B.o.B & Bruno Mars.  

 

Best Rap Album:

B.o.B Presents: The Adventures of Bobby Ray – B.o.B.

Thank Me Later – Drake

Recovery – Eminem

The Blueprint 3 – Jay-Z

How I Got Over – The Roots

It will be interesting to see if the Best Rap Album honour will deservedly go to the Roots, despite their modest commercial appeal. Black Thought’s struggles aren’t nobler or more important than those of Eminem or Jay-Z, but his calmness makes his story more persuasive than the rest of the mainstream nominees. Sometimes the committee will give the award to artists who’ve been nominated in the past but have never won before. Hopefully that mindset will play in the Roots’ favour this year; otherwise Eminem will win yet another award for yet another mediocre album.

 

Best New Artist:

Justin Bieber

Drake

Florence and the Machine

Mumford and Sons

Esperanza Spalding

This category isn’t always as packed with talent as it is this year, and any nominee could walk away with the Grammy. Drake has been a huge influence in the rap scene, Bieber’s a pop phenomenon, and Mumford & Sons have shined in the folk rock scene. Although there is no clear front-runner, we’re going to predict Florence & The Machine walks away with the hardware, just because we have a hunch.

 

The 53rd annual Grammy Awards airs February 13, on CBS at 8:00 p.m.

Sports

Martlets and Redmen send Rouge-et-Or packing

Ryan Reisert

After 15 years, Donald Love Competition Hall has finally seen its first capacity crowd. It may have been a long time coming, but both the Redmen and Martlets gave the sell out crowd of 872 exactly what they came to see, with big wins over conference rival Laval. Monika Fabian, president of Red Thunder, explained why the group hadn’t previously attempted to construct an event around a basketball game.

“It’s hard to organize an event around four hours of games,” said Fabian. “You have to dedicate your entire afternoon and evening to something like this. But I’m really glad it was as successful as it was.”

Martlets

Led by Natalie Larocque, the Martlets exploited their wide array of offensive weapons to overcome Laval’s superior size and get the 65-58 win.

Larocque had 21 points, Anneth Him-Lazarenko had 13 along with 11 rebounds, and Marie-Eve Martin scored 11 on eight shots.

Laval, who had a five game losing streak earlier this year, have turned their season around, winning four of their last six. Their two losses come against McGill who, at 10-1, are first in the Quebec conference.

It’s looking more and more likely that the McGill-Laval matchup will happen again, in the playoffs, with Laval the dark horse no one wants to face in the first round.

“I have no idea [what changed for Laval],” said Martin. “I don’t understand their situation but they seem to be stronger now than at the beginning of the season, so we definitely should not take them lightly.”

With the end of the regular season only five games away, the Marlets are looking to improve every time they’re on the court, and are simultaneously charging hard toward the goals they set at the beginning of the year.

“We haven’t accomplished anything yet, but we could hit our first [goal] of the season if we clinch first place,” said Head Coach Ryan Thorne. “The second was to win the conference playoffs, and the third was to make some noise in the CIS Championships.”

Realizing the first goal would certainly be an important step towards accomplishing the other two.

“We want to finish first so that everything’s at home and we have the fans on our side,” said Martin. “It always helps to have fans screaming at the other team.”

Added Natalie Larocque, “When I played in the States it was the exact same feeling, that your fans are behind you, and it’s a lot of fun.”

 

Redmen

The Redmen stepped up to win 85-83 against the number eight ranked Rouge-et-Or despite a bad night on the offensive end from leading scorer Simone Bibeau. Bibeau shot two for 15 overall and one for nine on three-pointers.

Still, Head Coach David DeAveiro was quick to point out that, “If he doesn’t make that one three-point shot, then we don’t win. So that one that he made was a big one.”

Picking up the scoring load for the Redmen were Olivier Bouchard with 21, Kyle Bernard with 12, and Greg Gause and Winn Clark with 11 apiece.

The ball was shared equally as nine players finished with at least five points.

Six-foot-eight center Greg Gause got himself involved all over the stat sheet with five blocks, six rebounds (three offensive), a pair of assists, and a three-pointer.

“I think I caused some matchup problems with other big men because I can take it outside a little so I think that helps us,” said Gause. “If it’s a guy [guarding me that] I feel like I can take in the post, I take him in the post, if it’s a guy I think is stronger than me I take him outside.”

The win was a crucial one in what’s shaping up to be an intense battle for home court in the playoffs between Laval, Concordia, and McGill. Currently, Laval is first in the Quebec conference with 18 points (nine wins), but Concordia is only two points back, with McGill another win behind Concordia.

“Our goal is to host a playoff game this year,” said DeAveiro. “The thing for us is to hopefully get a crowd like [Friday] for all our home games and build that spirit and sense of pride for McGill.”

McGill could end up playing Laval again in the playoffs. If the Redmen get home court DeAveiro is hoping for a similar student response to Friday’s Pack the House game, especially from the hecklers.

“[I]f you make a mistake the student body’s going to give it to you, right?” asked DeAveiro. “[Laval’s point guard Xavier] Baribeau’s a very good player who played a lot of minutes and got worn down a little bit, so a little credit goes to our defense and the guys that guard him. But for sure the fans make a big difference. Nobody wants to hear the chant ‘airball’ after they miss a shot.”

Baribeau shot an airball with 1:30 left in the third quarter and was serenaded by a loud McGill crowd for the rest of the game every time he touched the ball. From that point on, he had one rebound, one steal, three turnovers, shot zero for three from the field, and bricked two free throws.

Bouchard and Bibeau put the last touches on the victory by sinking free throws down the stretch.

Student Life

IPv4 no more

Last Thursday marked a significant event in the history of the Internet. While many people didn’t notice it, and it wasn’t nearly as publicized as Y2K, something happened that necessitates a major shift in the way the Internet functions: the Internet stopped growing.

Internet protocol addresses, or IP addresses, are embedded in the way computers work. A computer communicates much like humans would use mail. The machines send packets of data back and forth to each other, with each packet containing a “to” address, a “from” address, and a message. These addresses are encoded in numbers, as computers only understand numbers. Long ago, someone decided it would be safe to use 32 bits to encode addresses. We group these 32 bits into four groups of eight and read them off as a series of four numbers, like 127.0.0.1, or 192.168.1.1. Each of these four numbers goes from 0 to 255, meaning there are just over four billion possible addresses.

The person who came up with this addressing scheme never imagined there would be anywhere near this many computers on a single network. About 30 years ago, people started to realize this might be incorrect. Recently, the last block of addresses was given out by the body that oversees address allocation, the International Assigned Numbers Authority, or IANA. There are now no more IP addresses available. Until this situation is fixed, no new independent networks can connect to the internet.

IANA allocates these blocks to regional bodies, like the American Registry for Internet Numbers, ARIN, which maintains a block of addresses and distributes them to North American companies who need to connect additional machines to the net. These regional agencies all have reserve addresses, however, the reserve pool is quickly depleting. While big companies and ISPs often maintain a reserve pool for themselves, the number of machines trying to get online is constantly growing, and the infrastructure cannot support its current rate of growth for much longer.

While this might seem not too serious, the exhaustion of the IP address pool could pose a significant problem. With no IP addresses left for allocation, Internet companies won’t be able to network any additional computers once their reserves are depleted. The growth of the Internet will stop. It would be analogous to the telephone company simply running out of phone numbers. New phone owners would be unreachable until the problem was solved. Big companies will be unaffected, but any new company which needs a block of addresses will simply be cut off. To further complicate the problem, the only backup plan hasn’t been working very well.

The IPv6 standard was invented in the late 90s to combat the imminent address exhaustion. The protocol is very similar, but with a bigger number for the address. At 128 bits, the IP version six standard supports 1038 addresses. Many ISPs and agencies have started conversion to IPv6, but even 10 years after its introduction, less than five per cent of Internet traffic supports the standard. Even with the address pool depleted, there’s no urgency of any sort to adopt the new standard. The issue isn’t hardware or software related; IPv6 has been usable for years. Instead, it’s an issue of getting people to make the switch. Until IPv6 becomes more widespread, there will be big problems for Internet users.

While home users don’t need to worry about the implications of IPv4 address exhaustion, it could have serious implications on industry. Without growth of the Internet, it’s hard to imagine industry growing at the same rate it has for the past 20 years. The implications of the address exhaustion are much more severe than the media, which has largely ignored the issue, would lead you to believe. A handful of major Internet based companies have taken steps towards implementing the new protocol, but until governments mandate the switch, it’s unlikely that Ipv6 will become widespread. It’s hard to predict exactly what will happen in the coming months, but it doesn’t look promising.

Student Life

Mad med reputations

mccord-museum.qc.ca

In the 1860s and 1870s, the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University was known for an anatomy program that always seemed to have a fresh supply of cadavers for its students to dissect. The Faculty of Medicine came to be when the university  incorporated the Montreal Medical Institution. In 1833, the institution moved from their building on St. James Street to a new location that was described by a McGill registrar as “a strategic site for a medical faculty,” as it was located just over the fence from the cemetery.

The Medical students were largely separated from the university’s Arts students, and, according to McGill professor Stephen Leacock in 1942, “controlled their own funds, their own property, and their own activities.” Leacock hints at what John Irwin Cooper, another McGill professor from the 1940s, explained in more detail and in a slightly shocking language.

“The ‘meds’ were a strange and virile race, who, in popular opinion, divided their time between body snatching and fighting the police.”

At this time, there was a provincial act in place in Quebec that regulated the supply of bodies to medical schools. However this law was rarely enforced, which led to many bodies being taken by illegal means through the likes of “body snatchers” or “resurrectionists.” According to historian Joseph Hanaway, a body snatcher was able to sell a cadaver to medical schools for somewhere between $30 to $50, no questions asked. It became so lucrative a business that some students were even able to pay their tuition in full from the money they gathered from grave robbing. There were a number of stories of bodies taken from the cemetery and tobogganed down Côte-des-Neiges to McGill.

The situation came to its boiling point near the end of the 1880s, when one winter, a group of students decided to steal a number of bodies from a convent that had experienced a bout of typhoid fever. When it was discovered that the nuns’ bodies were missing, a public outcry arose, which led to the intervention of the Archbishop of Quebec. He appealed to the anatomy professors in order to figure out a way to stop these grave robbings, which resulted in a law that allowed all unclaimed bodies to be donated to Quebec Medical schools. This provided the students with a large enough supply of bodies that body snatchers were no longer needed.

Student Life

McGill Graduation bucket list

Whether you’re in U0 looking forward to the next three years out of residence, or in U3 trying to do all the things you said you wanted to do when you decided to come to McGill, there should be something on this list for you. After all, this is no rural run-of-the-mill university town, it’s Montreal.

So on those nights where you and your friends find yourselves sitting on the couch looking for something to do, consult your fridge (where you should have this article displayed) and choose an adventure.

1 Distillerie

With some of the best and most creative drinks in the city, this is the perfect place to grab a drink any night of the week. You’ll find an extensive menu of crazy concoctions served in very large mason jars. But remember to get there early,  it’s not a huge venue and it fills up fast.

2 Beauty’s

This family owned all day breakfast eatery is known for its jolly owner, Hymnie Sckolnick, who personally seats every customer. From classic Montreal bagels to traditional Jewish latkes, you can’t go wrong with any of the options on the menu.

3 Two dollar chow mein

Twoodles. Two dollar chow. Noodles with melted Kraft peanut butter. This fine cuisine goes by many different names but is perfect if you’re out on the town late at night looking for some sustenance. Walk up to the window on St. Laurent just past Pine and order a “Combo 3” (chow mein + two springrolls for an extra dollar.)

4 St. Patty’s on Crescent

When March 17th rolls around, gather a group of friends and head out to Crescent to paint the town green. Hotspots include Hurley’s Irish pub, Thursday’s, Mad Hatters, and of course staple bar Brutopia for a pint of Raspberry beer.

5 Ride the bull at Chez Serge

After a drink served in a sand pail with straws, challenge your friends to take a ride on the mechanical bull. Guaranteed memories include photos and bruises.

6 Tam tams

Every Sunday since 1978 starting in early May and going until late September, a drum circle takes place beside George-Étienne Cartier Monument on Parc Avenue just up from the McGill gym. Bring your own drum and join the percussion, browse the trinkets from street merchants, or have a picnic with friends. Definitely take a look at the LARPing (Live Action Role Playing) but don’t get caught in the crossfire; these people are serious about what they do.

 

7 Beaver tails in Old Montreal

These Canadian treats are just the thing to indulge your sweet tooth. A freshly baked warm pastry with your choice of toppings, which include but are by no means limited to Nutella, cinnamon sugar, ice cream, and fresh fruit.

 

8 Winter sports road trip

A great way to embrace the season is by taking on a winter sport by trying skiing, snowboarding, or ice skating. For all you internationals, or those who hail from warm climates, you can’t say you came to Montreal without trying at least one of the above. The McGill Ski and Snowboard club has weekly trips to mountains in the area so be sure to take a look.

9 Schwartz’s

Montreal’s famous smoked meat sandwiches are always a treat from this renowned delicatessen. You may have to unhinge your jaw to get a full bite. (Do they seriously think people can eat such wide sandwiches?)

 

10 Go to a McGill sporting event

Before you leave the Martlets and Redmen behind, why not show some school spirit by supporting your fellow athletes on the rink, court, or field? Rival Concordia games are highly recommended for extensive heckling. Brush up on your cheers … trust me, you rather be a Redman than a _______ bumblebee.

Student Life

Let Bonhomme guide you through Quebec’s Carnaval

Keeley Allen
urbanmoms.ca

Tire sur la neige. Bonhomme. Chateau Frontenac.

If you don’t know what these are, it may be time to head down to Quebec City for the final weekend of Carnaval. If you do, you already understand why you need to go again.

For those who have never taken a French class, Carnaval is the world’s largest outdoor winter festival. Held annually in Quebec’s capital, Carnaval originated as one of the of pre-Lent carnivals that take place in Roman Catholic communities across the world. It is, of course, no longer anywhere near Lent. The organizers probably figured that an icy carnival in February would be more fun than a slush-a-thon in March. They were so right.

A trip down to Quebec City can happen by train, bus, or car—or plane, but, like, really? Any of the first three will take about three hours, and will allow you to feast your eyes on the picturesque landscape of the Canadian highway. If you get bored of dead deciduous trees, or want something to eat, pull off at a highway stop and try some Valentine—the finest fast food Quebec has to offer. It’s just like an American fast food chain, but native to Quebec, so you know you’re doing good for a local community, the Earth, and your body. In any case, the poutine is to die for.

Once you get to Quebec, look out for the signs with the smiling white snowman with the red cap that looks like a Santa hat but isn’t one. This is Bonhomme, short for Bonhomme de Neige. He also wears a ceinture fléchée—a traditional French-Canadian sash, but you’ll only see this if you’re lucky enough to run into the real life Bonhomme. He’s fat and smiley and his face looks totally different than you thought it would. If he doesn’t climb into his tinted window bus before you get a chance to hug him, go for it.

You’ll also be able to see Bonhomme in full if you buy a $12 ticket to Carnaval, which comes complete with a mini Bonhomme action figure. I have that on my desk right now and I will treasure it always. Most of the activities in actual Carnaval that require a ticket are kid focused or fronts for corporate advertising. You can go on a zipline, but be sure to get the harnesses first (the two are actually located very far away from each other). A ticket will get you into the Ice Palace, which is pretty great, but it’s only a five minute walkthrough.

The best part about Carnaval, though, is enjoying all that gorgeous Quebec City has to offer. It’s touristy, but that’s fine because you’re there as a tourist. Check out the history—Chateau Frontenac is a gorgeous old railway hotel. The festival is right on the Plains of Abraham, where the British won Canada in the Seven Years’ War. There are monuments all over, and will be a great view of the water once the construction stops. There are art dealers selling cheap prints and beautiful paintings all over. There’s tire—hot maple syrup poured over ice to become some sort of magical toffee sensation, and there are the local bars, many of which are made of ice. Try the Caribou—a Quebec specialty shot—and sorlage, aka maple whiskey. While I was only there for the day, if you’re there for a while you’ll want to check out the parades. And make sure not to miss the outdoor dance party at Bonhomme’s palace (the only non child-oriented event that we could find), held from 7- 11 p.m. every night.

Places to eat: McDonalds. You won’t be able to afford anything else. But get some BeaverTails, poutine, and crepes along the way.

Places to drink: O-Zone. It sells pitchers for the price every other bar sells pints.

Carnaval du Quebec runs until February 13.  Check out details at carnaval.qc.ca.

Recipes, Student Life

Stuffed mushrooms

Holly Stewart
Holly Stewart

This weekend we had a guest stay with us, and wanted to impress them with a delicious dinner. We decided to make maple and spice glazed carrots and parsnips, three cheese mashed potatoes, and stuffed mushrooms. The stuffed mushrooms are a particularly good option if you’re feeding a vegetarian, but even carnivores will enjoy this delicious recipe.

Ingredients:  

  • Portobello Mushrooms (1 1/2 per person)
  • Two minced garlic cloves
  • Handful of freshly grated parmesan
  • Bag of spinach
  • Salt and pepper
  • Olive oil
  • Toasted pecans (optional)

Directions:

1. Set aside one mushroom per person, these will later be grilled. Chop the remaining mushrooms into small bits and cook them in a skillet over medium heat with a splash of olive oil and half the garlic.

2. Once the mushrooms are mostly done, start adding the spinach. You’re going to have to add the spinach in several parts so there’s time for it to cook down. We used about a box and a half of spinach to stuff six mini portobellos. Keep in mind that the spinach cooks down quite a bit.

3. As you are cooking the spinach, add in the remaining garlic.

4. At this point you should put the other mushrooms on the grill. Drizzle a bit of olive oil over the top then stick them on the heat. Since it’s the middle of winter and there was about a metre of snow chilling out on the deck when we cooked this, we decided to use the George Foreman grill instead of the barbecue. The only thing to keep in mind is that is does flatten the mushrooms a bit when cooking, so keep an eye on them to make sure they don’t get too squished.

5. Once the spinach has wilted, turn off the burner, immediately add the grated cheese and stir until melted. Some chopped up toasted pecans here would add some nice flavour and texture.

6. Take the mushrooms off the grill and heap the stuffing on top. Garnish with more parmesan.

News

Council votes to censure Newburgh

Matt Essert

The Students’ Society Council voted to publicly censure President Zach Newburgh in the predawn hours of Friday morning for his role in pursuing a contract with Jobbook.com, a new social networking website designed to match students at elite universities with potential employers.

The deliberations and the vote to censure, which lasted nearly six hours in total, were held in confidential session, shrouding councillors’ exact reasoning for the decision in secrecy. In an interview shortly after the close of confidential session, however, Newburgh detailed his involvement with Jobbook, including his financial stake in the company and the trips to the U.S. and Britain he took on weekends since the Fall.

In mid-September, Newburgh said, Jean de Brabant, a McGill alumnus and former guest lecturer in the Faculty of Law, contacted him about an “incredible student service.” After repeated entreaties, Newburgh met with de Brabant, who told Newburgh about a project he was working on that was under patent. To discuss it, however, Newburgh would have to sign a confidentiality agreement. Thinking the proposal wouldn’t be a serious one, Newburgh signed.

“People ultimately make poor judgment calls,” he said. “This would be one of them.”

De Brabant told Newburgh about his idea for a web site that connected students to potential employers, which he envisioned being promoted by elite universities’ student unions. The initial plan, Newburgh said, was for him to call or email student leaders at other universities to recruit them. But later de Brabant decided that it would be more effective for them to make their pitch in person

As a full-time employee of SSMU, Newburgh told de Brabant that he would only be able to travel on weekends, when he could be away from the office. De Brabant understood, Newburgh said, but insisted Newburgh receive a financial stake in return.

“He was pretty adamant that if we were going to be doing this on the weekends and during my personal time that I also be afforded the opportunity to get some kind of cut,” he said.

Newburgh accepted this, he said, on the condition that SSMU get a cut as well. He negotiated a deal in which SSMU would receive one share of Jobbook for each student that signed up for the service. He refused, however, to disclose the details of his own stake in the company.

Over the next two months, Newburgh and de Brabant embarked on several trips to elite universities in the U.S. and Britain, paid for by de Brabant. In October, the pair drove through New England and the Mid-Atlantic, meeting with student union presidents at Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Yale, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Pennsylvania. In November, they flew to California to visit five more universities, all of which signed contracts with the fledgling company.

Weeks later, the pair flew to Britain to pitch the idea to Oxford, Cambridge, University College London, and Imperial College.

Because he was bound the confidentiality agreement, Newburgh said, all three trips remained secret. In total, he said, he only missed one day of work at SSMU; for executives to take days off, though, he said, is “not at all uncommon.”

De Brabant’s confidentiality agreement ran out last month, Newburgh said, and he brought his four-month history with Jobbook to the attention of the Executive Committee on January 19. The matter came to a head on Wednesday—the same day that Jobbook officially launched. The meeting quickly devolved into a raucous shouting match between Vice-President University Affairs Joshua Abaki, who faulted Newburgh for his secrecy and what he called a conflict of interest, and VP Finance and Operations Nick Drew, who emphasized the website’s potential value to students.

“From my perspective, this is information you should have shared with all of the executive,” Abaki said at the meeting. “It doesn’t matter what you signed . . . the Society comes first.”

The Executive Committee voted to bring the matter to Council, where eight councillors—the minimum required number—voted in confidential session to impeach Newburgh. After concluding their regular business shortly after midnight, councillors debated for hours whether Newburgh deserved to be removed from office. They adjourned at about 5:15 a.m. after voting to censure him. Voting was by secret ballot, but the motion required the support of two-thirds of Council for approval.

Though Newburgh survived as president, the clash over Jobbook has left the executive deeply divided, with three members generally opposed to Newburgh and two others defending him. “How to move forward from here?” Newburgh said. “It is going to be tough.”

Newburgh remained upbeat about Jobbook, though, in which he recently renounced his financial stake. The website, he said, which generates revenue by charging a fee for companies who successfully use it to fill positions, “is going to explode.” That, he said, will make the controversy surrounding it worth it.

“Ultimately,” Newburgh added, “there was no harm done to the Society, there was no violation of any kind of policy, and this was always done in the best interests of students.”

News

Students voice concerns at GA Town Hall

Holly Stewart

Roughly 40 students attended a Town Hall meeting last Wednesday held by the Students’ Society to discuss a proposed referendum question about reforming the General Assembly.

The proposed motion would replace the GA with an Annual General Meeting and an online voting period for referendum questions. SSMU Council is set to vote February 3 on whether or not to put the question on the Spring referendum ballot.

SSMU President Zach Newburgh, the author of the question, gave notice of the motion at the SSMU Council meeting on January 20. After a number of students contacted him with concerns, he announced that he would hold a Town Hall to solicit further student feedback.

During the two-hour meeting, councillors and students offered various suggestions for improving both the GA itself and the proposed referendum question.

Max Zidel, clubs and services representative, responded to a comment about weak turnout at GAs by saying that a lot of the good things at McGill are done, or at least started, by smaller groups of students and that SSMU should foster this work rather than discourage it.

“I don’t think it should be a problem of who attends and how many,” Zidel said. “If it’s a problem of, ‘We don’t want everyone to vote on behalf of everyone because of that,’ we can reform the legislative aspect of the GA, make it less bureaucratic, etc. But the forum of discussion part could be only 10 people in the room and it would still be more valuable than no one.”

Erin Hale, U3 Philosophy, was concerned that changing to the proposed AGM format would remove any real force and meaning from the GA.

“What separates [an AGM] from a culture club?” she said. “Let’s get together and talk about something. People want to get together to make a decision. You’re cutting the balls of the GA by having these AGMs.”

Others expressed concern about the wording of part 28.3 of the proposed referendum question, which appeared to strictly limit the scope of debate at AGMs. But according to Robert’s Rules, this section would only limit debate for the purpose of voting. Newburgh said he plans to amend this section at the next Council meeting to make the wording more clear.

Myriam Zaidi, SSMU vice-president external, expressed mixed feelings about the event.

“I find it unfortunate that the turnout wasn’t great, that the vast majority of people were either councillors or members of the media,” said Zaidi. “[But as a positive], a lot of arguments that came up that not even executives or councillors thought of, not even those who are for the GA, like the education aspect.”

At the Town Hall, several students suggested that the GA’s attendance problems could be partially blamed on the average student’s insufficient knowledge of the inner workings of the GA. Some suggested that more education on the capabilities and operations of the GA ought to be implemented so that students could feel more comfortable with the process and be more likely to attend the GA and engage in debate.

Newburgh said many of the comments made by members of the audience had already been considered during the writing of referendum question, but that “there were a few new points that were made that are interesting to consider, some of which will be addressed to the form of amendments to the referendum question.”

Any amendments suggested will be presented, discussed, and voted upon at Thursday’s Council meeting.

Clubs and Services representative Maggie Knight noted that although she arrived to the event late, from what she saw, the Town Hall “was successful in being a place where people could share their ideas. Depending on what happens with these results, we might see some frustration or some excitement.”

Looking forward to the next Council meeting, several SSMU councillors and executives appear to have strong thoughts one way or another on the future of the GA and the GA-reform referendum question.

“Personally, ideally it would fail at Council. And if it doesn’t happen then I’d plan on being involved in a No campaign,” said Management representative Eli Freedman. “I was under the impression that we were reforming [the GA] and I had ideas for reforming it and I didn’t even think getting rid of it was an option. Now with the referendum question, that’s the only option.”

Knight said some of the concerns that have been raised could be traced to the complicated wording of the referendum question and that re-wording the question for clarity could alleviate some of the concerns.

“If we could re-write [the question] in a way that’s actually representative of what you could actually do with it, then maybe that would be okay,” Knight said. “But, it doesn’t clearly outline: we’ll have a debate and then we’ll be able to vote on stuff for the next three days. That’s nowhere in there.”

Several councillors have said they plan to bring critical questions and amendments with them to the February 3 Council meeting. However, Newburgh said he will stand strong in his position to defend the main force of the question.

“Any amendment that provides the opportunity for a small segment of the population to vote and excludes all others is unacceptable and against the spirit of the referendum question,” Newburgh said.

Knight, however, said the proposed reforms have led some students to question Newburgh’s leadership.

“We have a large number of councillors who don’t trust the motivations of our president,” Knight said. “Do I have a huge amount of trust for certain people and their motivations right now? No. Am I attempting to work collaboratively? Yes.”

Zaidi responded to concerns that the SSMU executive was divided on the issue.

“We are six people … elected on an individual basis,” she said. “It happens that some issues will divide us and this is one of the issues that does divide us.”

Newburgh explained that the question went through the Council steering committee without any dissent, and that he feels there would have been the “same outcry no matter what kind of process ensued.”

“Ultimately bold steps needed to be taken in order to force people into consultation on this issue,” Newburgh added. “This is an issue about ensuring the democratic character of our society and if we’re going to continue to uphold an undemocratic institution for the sake of students’ apathy, we are failing at our job as responsible representatives and leaders of the society.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue