Latest News

Sports

NBA’s new-look New York Knicks visit McGill gym

In one of the best-kept NBA secrets since “The Decision,” the New York Knicks practiced at McGill’s Love Competition Hall on Thursday. Amid little fanfare, the Knicks put in an afternoon of practice in preparation for an exhibition game Friday night against the Toronto Raptors at the Bell Centre. Members of the Redmen and Martlets basketball teams, as well as some members of the local sports media, observed the superstars.

It was the kind of event that doesn’t come around every day, and those who were there to witness it were not disappointed. On the same hardwood that our varsity teams call home and on which many of us play intramural sports, NBA players were practicing. Signs around the gym notified students that the gym was closed, and many did not even realize that their intramural contests were cancelled because of the presence of professional basketball players.

The Knicks relished a day outside of their usual surroundings and enjoyed practicing in a university environment. “To be able to go to a college where there’s lots of energy and excitement, that’s always good,” said Knicks Head Coach Mike D’Antoni. “Practicing every day, it becomes a bit of drudgery, so it’s a nice change.” Many of the pros took some time to help out the McGill athletes with some shooting technique.

The coach also mentioned that his players were enjoying their time in Montreal. “Most of our players have never been to Montreal. It’s a beautiful city, and for them to be able to experience the city the night before, I think it’s great.”

Whether that statement meant that players were loading up on poutine and enjoying the infamous Montreal nightlife or soaking in the culture is a mystery. If anyone saw some larger than average men on their way to the bar scene on Thursday night, they probably saw the Knicks.

While varsity athletes were allowed down to the gym to watch the practice, those who are not so athletically gifted were forced to watch from the windows above the gym near Tomlinson Hall. Surprisingly, in this age of instant communication, there were only about twenty people watching from above. Whether this was because McGill students don’t care about basketball or if they were too focused on their studies is irrelevant; they missed a rare opportunity.

Later on, a crowd gathered in the hall as the Knicks made their way from the gym to the bus back to their hotel. Some lucky students were able to take pictures with stars, like power forward Amar’e Stoudamire. One fan was even heard shouting to the newly signed free agent, “Take us back to the Holy Land!” A clever pun combining Amar’e’s task of revitalizing the team with the NBA’s longest playoff drought and the summer rumours that the star big man travelled to Israel and is now exploring his alleged Jewish heritage.

Returning to the playoffs will be a tough task for the Knicks but in an Eastern Conference dominated by only a couple of teams, the last few spots should be up for grabs. “We have some good players, we’re young and we need to come together,” said D’Antoni. “We’ll try to make the playoffs, and 29 other teams are trying to do the same. We have a good shot at being pretty good this year.”

If the Knicks live up to expectations this season, a few McGill students will remember that the road back to the post-season began with a shoot-around at our very own gym.

Sports

Redmen demolish Gaels in front of rowdy home crowd

John Kelsey
John Kelsey

The McGill Redmen trounced the Queen’s University Gaels 7-1 Saturday night, in a lopsided, but spirited game that featured strong defence, volatile tempers, and a four-goal performance by star forward Francis Verreault-Paul. It was the sixth straight win for the Redmen, who are undefeated this season.

From the opening face-off, the Redmen (6-0) played a high-intensity game, dominating in shots and scoring chances. They relegated most of the play to the Queen’s zone and led 3-0 by the end of the first period. Redmen sniper Verreault-Paul scored McGill’s opening two goals.

 “Queen’s is a solid team and we played really well tonight. We played well in our own end,” said Captain Evan Vossen, clearly pleased with his team’s efforts. “Just the little things we’ve worked on are paying off, so if we can just keep going like that we’ll have a lot of success.”

During the second period, McGill’s offence exploded with four unanswered goals. Verreault-Paul led the second-period offensive assault with his third and fourth goals of the game. Verrault-Paul was unstoppable all game, earning praise from his teammates

 “That’s just the kind of guy he is,” Vossen said. “He’s definitely a sniper, with him you know what you’re going to get. Everybody like [centre Guillaume] Doucet made great plays tonight and he was the beneficiary. He was able to finish them off.”

In the second period, tempers flared as the Queen’s team became increasingly frustrated. As a series of after-the-whistle shoving matches ensued, the rambunctious and large home crowd roared. Nine separate players went to the penalty box for roughing in the span of less than one minute.

“We were up 5-0 at that point and tried not to get in their game too much, but we have to protect and defend ourselves a bit, so for sure the tempers were running high,” said Guillaume Doucet, who picked up three assists in the contest. “It’s always a rivalry when we play against Queen’s. The crowd is always loud, especially when it’s here.”

By the start of the third period, the Redmen led 7-0. McGill noticeably relaxed failing to score and only mustering four shots on goal in the third. The Gaels put up the lone marker of the period when forward Brock Ouellet scored at 1:13. The goal was the only blemish on Redmen goaltender Hubert Morin’s near-perfect night. He stopped 16 of the 17 shots sent his way.

The game was a penalty-filled outing and resulted in the Redmen’s special teams units dominating the night. They scored twice on the powerplay and notched two impressive shorthanded markers.

“Those goals are definitely big momentum builders,” said Head Coach Kelly Nobes about McGill’s special teams dominace. “Scoring on your penalty kill is unexpected and our special teams were very effective, with our power play also generating a couple goals. We were very opportunistic. We scored when we got our chances.”  

With an impressive six straight wins, the pressure is on for the Redmen to continue performing at this calibre.

“You try not to think about it, we go one night at a time, but tonight feels good, it’s a big win,” Doucet said. “It doesn’t mean much for the streak though, because next game we have to do it all over again. But it’s still a big step in the right direction. We need to keep playing like we did tonight.”

The Redmen look to keep their win streak alive on Friday in Kingston.

Sports

Winless team massacred by top-ranked Rouge-et-Or

Adam Scotti

The nation’s number-one-ranked team, the Laval Rouge-et-Or (8-0) massacred the winless McGill Redmen (0-8), who were looking for just their second home victory in two years. Laval scored a minute and a half into the first quarter and never looked back, posting a 68-0 win over the Redmen.

There were no good signs for McGill on Saturday, especially for the many seniors who have now played their last game on McGill’s home field.

“We can’t take a lot out of this game,” said Head Coach Sonny Wolfe. “It just shows us how far we have to go to compete with the best.”

Laval scored as many touchdowns as McGill had first downs. When Rouge-et-Or placekicker Christopher Milo sent his seventh extra point through the uprights just before halftime, a flock of seagulls that had been congregating on the empty north side stands abruptly got up and flew away. Like looking directly into the sun, no one, not even the birds, could keep their eyes on the game for an extended period of time.

Except, that is, for the many Laval fans who made the trip to Montreal and were louder than the home supporters.  They at least had something to cheer about.  The highlight of the game for McGill came in the first quarter when third year defensive back Joff Gorin intercepted an errant Bruno Prud’homme pass, one of the few mistakes Laval made all game. The drive, of course, ended in another three-and-out for the Redmen.

The 130th season of McGill football will mercifully end next weekend as the Redmen go on the road to face Sherbrooke Vert-et-Or. The team is already eliminated from playoff contention, meaning that McGill has now missed the Quebec University Football League playoffs four years in a row. A loss to Sherbrooke would cap off McGill’s third winless season in the last four years.

Arts & Entertainment, Music

Avey Tare – Down There

Often overshadowed by the overwhelming success of his bandmate Panda Bear, many are probably unaware that Avey Tare—one-fourth of Animal Collective—works as a solo artist as well. Down There, his solo debut, takes the listener on an adventure through the depths of murky swamps, riding distorted synths and bass-heavy sampling to return thoroughly satisfied at the other end.

The album reveals Tare’s unconventional pop sensibility and sense of restraint. Songs average an accessible three to four minutes in length, and rather than overwhelm the listener with an exhaustive audio journey, each track seamlessly fades into the next.

“Laughing Hieroglyphic,” Down There‘s first track, features a pulsating accordion as Avey Tare’s voice takes the forefront, passionately singing, “It’s so easy to get lost in the mixture/ When forces strike/ Hard.” While Animal Collective has focused on making vocals merely another component of their songs, Avey Tare’s voice is the driving force of the album, allowing the sampling and layers of sound to support the song rather than dictate its sound.

Avey Tare’s 34-minute album is one of the most cohesive and structured I’ve heard in a long time. Each twist and turn has a purpose, and the journey the listener begins on the first track feels complete and fulfilled by the end.

Arts & Entertainment, Music

PS I Love You – Meet Me At The Muster Station

Let’s be thankful that PS I Love You are better at writing songs than they are at picking band names. While the moniker is ripe for ridicule, the 10 tracks that make up Meet Me At The Muster Station demand far more respect.

Hailing from Kingston, Ontario, vocalist/guitarist and bass pedal player Paul Saulnier and drummer Benjamin Nelson make fuzzy, lo-fi garage rock that’s inevitably going to draw comparisons to Vancouver rockers Japandroids and L.A. punks No Age. It’s not totally unwarranted—they’ve got the frenetic energy and youthful abandon of the former and the noisier qualities of the latter, plus there’s the “duo” angle to work—but there’s more to it than that. Songs like “2012” and “Get Over” show Saulnier’s knack for guitar hooks while “Butterflies and Boners” and the buzz-creating “Facelove” feature full-on stadium-sized guitar solos. The tunes become all the more impressive when you realize it’s just two dudes responsible for all of that noise.

Vocally, Saulnier plays kid brother to Wolf Parade’s Spencer Krug, with screams, yelps, and warbles that up the album’s “weird” factor. But being buried way, way back in the mix, and aside from a couple moments of clarity, it’s damn near impossible to pick out any lyrical narrative or sentiment. It’s frustrating—these songs are so urgent and impassioned that you want to sing along, but you don’t know what the hell they’re saying.

Arts & Entertainment, Music

Belle and Sebastian – Write About Love

Belle and Sebastian Write About Love is the Scottish group’s eighth album in 15 years, and their age is starting to show. Unfortunately, while their signature sound remains intact, the overall message of the album isn’t as obvious as previous releases.

Frontman Stuart Murdoch doesn’t wear his heart on his sleeve like he used to, and the album feels like the band has grown up. But Murdoch’s emotional reservation also makes the album a tougher listen. The honesty and quirky sadness that make up Belle and Sebastian’s quintessential sound is missing, and when familiar elements of the band’s style come out—synthesizers, horns, and airy vocals—they don’t feel as energetic as they once did.

The record has its high points, including the tracks, “I Didn’t See it Coming,” “Little Lou, Ugly Jack, Prophet John,” featuring Norah Jones, and the title track featuring actress Carey Mulligan. However, by the eighth track, “The Ghost of Rockschool,” the record begins to lag, and never really recovers. The record’s punchy beginning gets bogged down by slower tracks like “Calculating Bimbo” and the flute-heavy “Read the Blessed Pages,” both of which end up feeling out of place and not as wistful and sweet as classic Belle & Sebastian.

Murdoch and company are known for their tragedy-tinged whimsy and Write About Love sounds a little tired. It may be time for them to fully embrace their grown-up identity rather than hold on to a lesser version of the sound that has made them instantly recognizable for so many years.

Sports

Basketball’s great, but which league entertains us best?

The NBA and College Basketball Seasons are about to begin and there is no better time to revisit the debate on which league is more entertaining and deserving of your attention.  NCAA fan Rebecca Babcock and NBA advocate John Willcock duke it out.

NBA

Coaching/Game play

The quality of coaching and game play in the NBA is the best in the world. There are undoubtedly great coaches and players in college, but they are spread thinly among schools that prioritize sports. The talent in the NBA is deeper than in college basketball. The most significant differences between the NCAA and NBA’s gameplay are the foul-out rules, game time, threepoint line, and shot clock. The NCAA is said to have more emphasis on tactics and defensive execution. As a spectator I don’t care about who can run the best 2-3 zone defense; I want to see the fast-paced and high-quality game play of the NBA.

Competitiveness

The NBA, quite simply, has the best talent. Many critics have argued that NBA players are overpaid and  complacent once they’ve signed a significant contract. How then would one explain Dwyane Wade’s memorable 2006 finals performance with the Heat, or Kobe Bryant’s relentless pursuit of his fifth Championship this past season after signing an $87 million, three-year extension? In both instances, players met the expectations placed before them. True competitors prevail in the end, and the players who are financial drains do not last. NBA players are paid proportionally to the entertainment they generate.

Professional vs. Amateur

In 2006, the NBA and the National Basketball Players Association agreed upon a collective agreement prohibiting players from going directly from high school to the NBA, or prep-to-pro. The agreement is indicative of a changing trend  The NCAA has typically acted as a farm system for the NBA. However the system is quickly evolving, with many elite players demonstrating their inclination to find their way into the spotlight of the NBA as quickly as possible. In the 2010 NBA draft, seven of the top 10 draft picks were collegiate freshmen opting out of college. In 2008, Brandon Jennings, a highly touted high school player, chose to play in Italy for a year as opposed to playing college ball. Both trends indicate that college basketball is becoming transitory.

– John Willcock

NCAA

Coaching/Game play

Coaching in the NCAA is much more tactical than coaching in the NBA. NBA offences are repetitive because teams use isolation plays for their star players over and over. How many times in an average game does Steve Nash drive to the basket and dish to one of his centers? How many isolations will the Lakers run for Kobe?  The teams in the NCAA have more varied offences. Duke, for instance, has a 3 out 2 in offence, 4 out offence, and a zone offence. The coach can strategically change offences, which creates variation in the game.

Competitiveness

Two words: March Madness. This tournament is the essence of competition. Players play urgently in the hopes of pursuing basketball professionally. In contrast to the NBA’s best-of-seven playoff format, this tournament is single-elimination, which raises the stakes and creates upsets that the NBA playoffs cannot offer. With a closer three-point line, any team can make a huge comeback if they catch fire from three-point land. Just last March, ninth seeded Northern Iowa beat the top-ranked, defending champion Kansas. This is common in the NCAA tournament. Also, the vast array of teams in the NCAA adds to the excitement. Who doesn’t like “discovering” a mid-major?

Professional vs. Amateur

The NBA is a business, so many of the decisions are made for financial, not competitive reasons. Because of salary cap restrictions, every year there are uneven trades that will unevenly stack certain teams while other teams become less competitive to save money. In the NCAA, without the aspect of money, you see passion, which is sometimes lost in the midst of business. After his final year at Gonzaga, Adam Morrison cried. The players of the NCAA play with a passion that is often absent in the NBA.  For example, this past season the Boston Celtics coasted through the regular season. In a shorter NCAA season ever game matters. On Selection Sunday every year deserving teams are left out of the tournament because of one or two bad losses.

– Rebecca Babcock

Winner:

NBA

Opinion

Discipline and punish

Last summer, while casually lounging with my friends on a bench in Washington Square Park after a night of partying in New York’s East Village, I came face to face with three policemen hovering over us.

“What are you doing here?” one of them said.

“We are just sitting,” I said. It was the truth. Granted, we had probably partaken in a few slightly illegal activities throughout the night: underage drinking, a toke of a joint, and I suppose identity fraud if you want to get very technical. But now we were just sitting. Three girls chatting on a park bench can hardly even be considered loitering.

“Didn’t you see the sign? You can’t be here past midnight.”

“Sorry, we didn’t realize,” I said as earnestly as possible.

“Well you can tell to that to the judge. If you fail to show up in court by the given date, there will be a warrant out for your arrest.”

As the first cop smugly filled out my pink summons—the offence noted a “failure to obey sign”—the other two proceeded to fill out those for my companions. The following week, I schlepped myself down to the New York City Courthouse where I waited for hours and hours only to get the stamp of acquittal from a mindless bureaucrat. But as I sat in the massive room with all the other people who had—perhaps unfairly—been sentenced to a day at the courthouse for petty crimes and misdemeanors, I began to ponder what was suddenly taking place in my mind.

This was my first brush with the law, and as minor and silly as it was retrospectively was, it nonetheless left me sure that I never wanted to experience anything like it again. No longer did I look at police as my friendly neighbourhood protection, but instead walked quickly by, hoping they did not catch me in my latest “criminal” act. No longer did I feel, skipping through the city on a Sunday afternoon, that I was on the side of the law—that the police had nothing to do with, and were only there to protect, law-abiding citizens like me. In the words of Michel Foucault, I suddenly became a “delinquent.”

Although I knew there was no way I would actually be punished for this ridiculous non-crime, as I waited in that room I began to experience a lurching in the pit of my stomach as if I were a criminal awaiting the death sentence. The critical theory I had read in the classroom suddenly leapt off the pages and into my own reality. I had become acutely aware of Foucault’s obscure “Panopticon”—every act I engaged in was executed with utmost docility, in case some figure of authority was lurking around the bend. In the subsequent months, I counted my change several times before handing it to the cashier, waited for every green light (and nobody does that in New York), and even avoided going to bars until I actually turned 21.

It goes without saying that minority groups and illegal immigrants have long borne the burden of arbitrary policing and unjust state authority in ways that I, a middle-class white girl, can never begin to truly understand. It would be ignorant to pretend that my brief run-in with the law has given me any right to feel angry with my government, or to attend anti-police rallies. But I certainly now have a greater respect for groups like the ACLU that work to hedge laws like those passed last summer in Arizona, which suddenly turn innocent people into outsiders, enemies of the state and delinquents rather than fellow citizens of the world.

Sometimes it’s useful to jump off the ivory tower and into the school of life—to personalize arbitrary questions of authority and power into something rudimentary and practical. As a professor of mine once said, “You don’t have to explain the theory of communism to a factory worker.”

Opinion

The problem of carrying capacity

McGill Tribune

In the face of growing fears concerning global climate change, and the possible repercussions we may experience, the idea that the human population has grown too large is one that is gaining acceptance.  Meanwhile, politicians are playing word games, relying on semantics to assure us that this is not the case.  Consider the term “carrying capacity.” The current definitions refer to how many people Earth’s resources can support, including future generations.  There is no mention of the allowance of other ecosystems and organisms to also be supported, and only a vague reference to the other strains the human population places on the planet, outside their use of the resources. These are imprecise and ambiguous definitions, meant to instill in us the impression that we are still well within carrying capacity and that there is nothing to worry about.

What the Earth can or cannot support is a complex issue and one that is not simply boiled down to resources, finite or not. An improved definition—one which drives a new comprehension of the human relationship with the environment—is needed so as to truly understand how we can live sustainably on the planet. This definition must include the carbon dioxide emitted, not only from industrial uses and technology, but from the breath of six billion people, their pets, and the livestock needed to sustain them.  It must include the other natural consequences of supporting these people, such as the waste and runoff from the livestock and agriculture. It must also include the ability of Earth to sustain not only the human population, but the populations of all other organisms in existence. It must make clear that humans have to coexist with all other species, and not continue to act as the dominant, subjugating power.

According to the existing definition, in all its infinite wisdom, scientists have been able to determine that Earth can support anywhere from two to forty billion people.  Some have realized how incredibly laughable that is and have kindly narrowed it down to ten to twenty billion people. All seem to be in agreement that we are still within carrying capacity. But what would the consensus be if we were to redefine carrying capacity, clarify its terms, and be realistic? The answer is that we would find that we, to understate it, are in a slight bit of trouble.

Opinion

QPIRG abuses its mandate

McGill Tribune

Walking through the Quebec Public Interest Research Group building is like stepping into a different world. Posters entitled “No Olympics on Stolen Land,” “No to Canada-U.S. Imperialism,” and Middle East maps without Israel deck the walls of their hallways.

QPIRG is a student-funded organization that collects tens of thousands of dollars in fees from McGill University students. It is supposed to be pursuing the “interests of students on issues of public concern.” But QPIRG doesn’t focus on mainstream issues of public concern. Instead QPIRG takes stands on issues that the majority of McGill students either oppose or are indifferent to.

This is especially true for QPIRG’s interest in foreign affairs, which manifests itself in support of groups that commit violence and terrorism. For example, QPIRG funds “Tadamon!,” an anti-Israel organization that supports de-listing of Hezbollah, which has pledged to annihilate every single Jewish man, woman, and child on Earth, as a terrorist organization. QPIRG also funds “Students Taking Action in Chiapas,” an organization which actively supports the violent Mexican Marxist Zapatista rebel movement, and seeks to bring “the struggle back home” to Canada.

But QPIRG does not stop there. QPIRG also considers Canada an apartheid state and marks “Anti-Canada Day” on July 1 as well as FLQ bombings in its published “School Shmool” organizer (printed with student money).

There are currently two sets of rules for student political organizations at McGill: one applies to QPIRG, and the other to everyone else. For the latter category, campus political groups such as Liberal McGill apply for funding through SSMU. They are accountable to SSMU equity policies, and receive a few hundred dollars. Each political group gets approximately the same funding. However, QPIRG operates by different rules. Instead of having to apply for funding, they are able to directly levy students and raise over $125,000 for their own campaigns. They are not subject to SSMU equity policies, and are not accountable to anyone but themselves. This allows them to outspend every single other political group by a ratio of 100:1. If QPIRG was truly a student group, the levy could be justified; however, considering that they are an explicitly political organization that uses student money to conduct fringe political campaigns, it is wrong for them to directly levy students.

None of this is to say QPIRG does not do any good in the world. They do provide support to the gay community, for example, and that is an effort that should be commended. But they undermine all the genuine good they do by abusing their mandate to pursue the petty political causes of their directors and motivated interest groups.

If QPIRG wants to undermine the Opt-Out Campaign, don’t rip apart their flyers. Don’t attack their tables. Instead, be a student organization for all students. Commit yourselves to academic debate; not one-sided propaganda events like “Culture Shock,” which refuse to entertain opposing views. Stop funding extremist groups and get back to what really matters: support for charities, support for students who feel marginalized, connecting McGill students to the city of Montreal, and support for truly academic research.

Spencer Burger is U3 Joint Honours History and Political Science student. He is currently the Arts Councillor to SSMU, and a member of the Opt-Out Campaign

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue