In her recent article Die “Hipster” Die Zoe Daniels claims that the word hipster has “become a comfortable crutch for those lazy judges who see a single pair of plastic- framed glasses as an unbridgeable ideological gap” for various groups including those “L.L. Bean clad hikers.” L.L. Bean is a wonderful place that provides high-quality products at reasonable prices, products that can be used long after the last pair of skinny jeans have been dumped into the Salvation Army bin, and will surely still be going strong on that beautiful day when plaid can once again be worn with pride. In 25 years – when people no longer ask what your tattoo means, but rather when your laser removal surgery is scheduled for – L.L. Bean will still honour their lifetime warranty on that backpack even though you bought it in the fourth grade. It is for these reasons, Ms Daniels, that I ask that next time you wish to criticize society, please, leave L.L. Bean out of it. It has done nothing wrong.
Latest News
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Not AMUSEd
In last week’s editorial, you stated that AMUSE – The Association of McGill University Support Employees – left some students “in the dark” by failing to adequately contact all potential voters. Out of respect for the newly accredited members of the bargaining unit and the supporters who spent countless hours contacting the eligible voters, I feel it is necessary to correct some blatantly incorrect facts you stated about the voting procedure.
The list of eligible voters was created by McGill – not AMUSE – and was supposed to consist of all non-academic casual employees who were working both at the time of the application to the Labour Board by AMUSE – April 2009 – and the start of the vote period itself – September 2009. Although all non-academic casual workers are part of the bargainning unit, only those who met this requirement were eligible voters. This is standard procedure and legal precedent, meant to prevent anti-union mass hirings by the employer.
Again as codified in law, it is the Labour Board who mails the voting ballots to ALL eligible voters to the address provided by McGill. AMUSE has NOTHING to do with the logistics of the vote.
With a copy of the voters’ list, AMUSE was able to send an informational flyer and voting reminder to every address on the list. AMUSE supporters also contacted most of the voters by telephone to inform them of the vote. Many voters were contacted more than once. All voters were also informed by email.
The email address you reference hasn’t been used for more to a year – as its acronym should tell you, it was from an earlier attempt at the same union-drive when only undergraduates were being targeted. As the campaign shifted, so did the nature of the organization.
To not do everything within our power to get out word on the vote would have been a poor strategic choice on our part: winning accreditation requires an absolute majority of all eligible voters to vote in favour. Every non-vote – i.e., every person who was not aware of the vote – counted against us. We agree it is absolutely vital to contact every last member of the new bargaining unit, but we must wait on McGill to provide us such a list before we can begin to do it.
I hope this helps to clarify things. AMUSE is currently in the process of structuring itself and we need bargaining unit members to get involved! If anyone has any time or if they have any questions, they should be encouraged to send us an email at [email protected].
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Brendan is simple-minded
Brendan Steven’s column “Right Minded: Defending Prorogation” is a good example of the limited nature of Steven’s political opinions. His blind reverence for everything the Harper government does is demonstrative of the same sort of extremeness that he attempts to delegitimize in his column. The way Steven describes the “grassroots” opposition to prorogation seems to assume that such a position is exclusively held in the domain of Facebook. Steven describes examples of the very extreme opposition to Harper in the anti-prorogue Facebook group, highlighting some of the most innane anti-Harper positions (that he is a kitten killer, for example). By addressing only extreme and irrelevant opposition to Harper’s prorogation of the government, Steven doesn’t do the issue justice. It is a fundamental problem that Harper found it appropriate to suspend parliament as he found it convenient; it is demonstrative of the kind of politics he is prone to: settling on convenient absence rather than thoughtful political action. Rather, Steven deemphasizes the problem, reminding us that the prorogue will last “only two months.” Furthermore, Steven attacks the notion of political activism made easier by Facebook. Does this not reflect a healthy democracy? Our opinions can be broadcast more easily than ever, and their weight is strong enough to be detected by traditional media, as Steven has mentioned. Sure, this makes it easier for irrelevant and extreme comments to mindlessly be published, but can’t we apply the same criticism to many newspaper columns that use the same degree of extremism, thinly veiled in academic rhetoric and neat typeface?
A conversation with Stuart Cobbett, Board of Governors chairman
On January 6, the University’s Board of Governors, McGill’s highest governing body, announced Montreal-based lawyer Stuart H. (Kip) Cobbett as its new chairman. Cobbett, who succeeds outgoing chair Robert Rabinovich, received his B.A. from McGill in 1969 and B.C.L. in 1972, and has since served the McGill community as both a lecturer in the Faculty of Law and president of the McGill Alumni Association, among other responsibilities. The Tribune spoke with Cobbett about becoming chairman.
Can you describe the history of your involvement with McGill and how you’ve come to this accomplishment?
It goes back many years to the late ’80s. At the time, I was working not as a lawyer but in the film and television business. I was asked to get involved with something called the Board of Visitors for the Faculty of Arts, which is like an advisory body for the Faculty of Arts, and I was chair of that board for a few years. At about the same time I was asked to sit on the editorial advisory board of the McGill News. So that’s kind of what started my formal relationship with McGill. Way before that I had taught at the law school, from ’76 to ’85 … And then I went to England in the mid- 1990s, and when I was there they asked me to take over the chairmanship of the McGill Alumni Association in the U.K., which I did. When I came back in 2000, they asked me to get involved with the Alumni Association here, and I became president of that and then subsequently ended up going on the Board a few years ago.
Where does the Board stand on Bills 38 and 44 at this point?
We’re not too sure where we stand at the moment. There were hearings before the National Assembly committee back in November and December, but we haven’t heard anything back from that, so we’re just waiting. We hear that they are trying to make amendments but we don’t know that for sure. We just don’t think [the bills are] necessary. The problem is that each of the Quebec universities is individual, so to try to have one overarching piece of legislation that applies to all the universities is almost, by definition, impossible. Each university is governed differently. Each university is at a different stage in terms of the development of governance processes, and in terms of giving the government the tools that they need to have oversight of the universities, we think they already have the tools. It’s much more from the point of view that we just think this legislation is wrong. The students seem to agree with us, and the various faculty and staff associations seem to agree with us, but at the moment we’re all in a wait-and-see mode.
What did Rabinovich do well, and what would you change?
Robert did a lot of things well. One of his main accomplishments was the revamping of the board, and reducing the numbers of the board. Seven or eight years ago you would have 50 or 60 people at the Board of Governors meetings, and that’s just too big a group to have any sort of effective discussion. So when Munroe-Blum became principal and when Rabinovich became chair, they embarked on a review and revision of the board. The result has been that McGill is at the forefront of governance structures certainly among Quebec universities, and I would say possibly even Canadian universities.
Any specific goals you would like to see the Board of Governors achieve looking ahead to your term?
There are a number of things on the radar we are focussing on – diversifying the sources of funding is one. We are very dependent on government and we will always be very dependent on government, but it will be nice to find other areas of support for the university. We’d also like to focus on students. When the principal several years ago had the Task Force on Student Life and Learning, we are not putting many of those recommendations into effect – for example, the student centre going into the basement of McLennan Library. Sustainability is important as well. There’s a big commitment to the campus being ecologically and environmentally defensible. … It’s something to which the board is committed. We’ve had a number of presentations on it from [Associate Vice-Principal University Services] Jim Nicell. There are always things we’re doing and trying to bring in.
Any final thoughts?
McGill has done a good job at remaining focussed on its mission. We are a particular university; we are a public university but we are containing our growth. As the principal reminds us frequently we are becoming a medium-sized university compared to others, particularly in Canada. We continue to maintain a spectacularly good position in the world; McGill has a great reputation, deservedly so, so what we have to do is make sure we keep it and improve it. We have a wonderful student body, a super faculty and staff; the whole thing is just in good shape.
Queer McGill executives resign
Four new Queer McGill executives were elected on Friday evening to fill some of the vacancies left by the five executives who resigned from the organization in December and January
Queer McGill’s volunteer, policy and equity, political action, and publicity co-ordinators resigned from the group, along with one of the organization’s co-administrators. The executives cited both personal and academic reasons for resigning.
“It seems like [the executives who resigned] were doing what was best for them, and they needed to do what they needed to do,” said Parker Villalpando, Queer McGill co-administrator, adding that the resignations did not cause any major setbacks for the group.
“It wasn’t really good timing since we had our retreat the first weekend of the semester, which took a lot of planning. But that was pulled off perfectly, so there weren’t a lot of problems,” he said. “Luckily some of [the resignations] happened right before finals, so there wasn’t that much going on with the organization at that time other than planning for the retreat and preparing for our General Assembly.”
At the group’s General Assembly last Friday, Pamela Fillion was elected as co-administrator, Carol Kwon as publicity co-ordinator, Zach Kornblum as volunteer co-ordinator, and Kevin Wyllie as policy and equity co-ordinator. The position of political action co-ordinator remains vacant.
Villalpando said he was happy with both the election turnout and results and is confident in the new executives.
“I’m definitely happy with how things went. I’m very excited to work with the new execs. They all seem to be very dedicated and excited to be there,” he said. “So I’m excited to work with them and hopefully everything will go smoothly for the rest of the semester. I’m sure everything can go as planned.”
In addition, those who attended the General Assembly voted to provide a $300 honorarium for all of last semester’s executive members, which represents a $50 increase from last year’s amount.
BLACK & WHITE: This mortal coil
Existential crises are as awkward to talk about as bowel movements. In a milieu that celebrates irony more than sincerity, any attempt to be philosophical is either going to make me resemble an overeager, emo teenager, or an indecipherable, pompous intellectual, and I’m not sure which I’ll end up sounding like in this column. And I’m not sure which I’d rather be.
My latest existential crisis took place in a movie theatre. Now, the success of any movie-going experience requires that you devote your full attention to the screen. But once in a while, my eyes drift from the aural and visual show transpiring before me. I notice how ridiculous the neighbour to my left looks with his mouth hanging open like a broken hinge. Soon enough, a small crack appears in the illusion this film has been trying to create.
But worse, sometimes this brief moment of distraction dumps me into an existential pit where I find myself cozying up to the remains of angsty poems. For me, it’s the realization that my neighbour, as silly as he looks holding popcorn between his fingertips like delicate offerings, has a whole interior world to which I don’t have access. I realize I have no idea how his circuit of optic nerves are mapping images on his mind. And I realize he has no awareness of my mind. I feel both lonely and independent and start wondering if they’re the same thing.
I have similar existential crises after films that mesmerize me, that make me think – inspired slightly by Liz Lemon – “this movie is the thang.” The way light splashes across the white, nondescript screen. The way the crescendo of music matches the rise and fall of my heartbeat. A story that fulfills fantasies, characters who feel things the way I’ve felt them. In the movie theatre, in the darkness, in the show of light and color, packaged in celluloid filigree: oneness!
But then the film ends. Friends and acquaintances gather outside the theatre and make necessary visits to the loo. Then, someone who I will either end up despising or adoring asks, “What did you think?” The words I offer in reply are flat compared to what I have just experienced, but I mean them, and I insist that I mean them, and to ensure that there has been no confusion, I bust out that prefacing wonder, “I know it’s a cliché but…”
My friend looks perplexed. He’s unable to comprehend what could have drawn such a passionate response out of my usual placidity. A familiar throb of despair brings me down. Distance emerges between me and this person who I had felt close to before the film began. I can tell he has already forgotten what it was like to sit in that theatre, the way people forget what it’s like to sit on a toilet.
And when this happens, I become aware of an existential tragedy: my inability to project onto someone else experiences that have wound themselves into the ‘essence’ of me. With that also comes the thrill of privacy and secrecy, the seductive idea that I am not entirely discoverable, and that no one will ever know the beauty I have known. So lately, I’ve been thinking about how unknowable I am to myself and how unknowable others are to me, and yet, despite this, the confusing fact that I’m still chasing desperately after understanding and intimacy.
This type of philosophical meandering only puts you on a draining search for a resolution that doesn’t exist. But maybe we’d manage our existential crises better if our discussions of philosophy hadn’t been chucked from our daily lives and left to go stale in the Humanities departments of universities. Or, in high school corridors bursting with hormonal urgency. Meanwhile, I could use a hiatus from introspection. 30 Rock, here I come.
Mahak Jain is the Tribune’s newest columnist. You can reach her at [email protected] We are still accepting applications for columnists. If you want to appear alongside Mahak every other week, send a cover letter and two sample columns to [email protected].
Helping Haiti: doing our part for the relief effort
It has been one week since an earthquake measuring 7.0 in magnitude struck near Port-au-Prince, Haiti, devastating the country’s infrastructure and sparking a humanitarian disaster. The Red Cross has confirmed that 50,000 people are dead, while Haitian officials say the death toll could be as high as 200,000. This is, of course, an unspeakable tragedy – the earthquake has left a shocking number of Haitians hungry, homeless, and helpless, necessitating a far-reaching global relief effort. And now, more than ever, Haiti needs our help.
McGill students across campus have taken this sentiment to heart. Last Wednesday, the Arts Undergraduate Society Council launched a faculty-wide campaign to raise $6,000 for the Haitian relief effort. The donations will supplement Oxfam Quebec’s relief work through the Humanitarian Coalition in Haiti. All week, students will solicit donations at the Roddick Gates, in the Leacock Lobby, the AUS office, and the Science Undergraduate Society office. The campaign had raised $4,331.10 as of yesterday.
The Human Rights Working Group and the Law Students’ Association have launched a similar campaign, raising money for Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders. And on Saturday the Ghetto Shul hosted a party which ultimately raised $1,000 for Doctors Without Borders.
The Tribune applauds the selfless work of all these campaigns. Remember: the Canadian government will match all donations made until February 2, so we encourage you to donate and support the relief effort in Haiti. As privileged global citizens, it’s our moral duty to assist the Haitian relief effort to the best of our abilities.
Some students, we’ve been told, have indicated that over Reading Week they may join the relief effort and travel to Haiti. However, we’d like to stress that unless you’re trained as a doctor, aid worker, or in another field of disaster relief, it’s better not to go. Unfortunately, well-meaning volunteers can often do more harm than good, in the sense that they provide less than they use, especially in the way of food. Instead, give money and supplies. The benefits your donation provides will be more efficient that way. Put together a fundraising campaign. Hold a bakesale. But don’t go: you’ll just be another mouth to feed.
The United States’ and Canada’s swift action, leading the Haitian relief effort, has also been impressive. On Thursday, President Barack Obama pledged $100 million to Haiti. Former presidents Bill Clinton (also the UN special envoy for Haiti) and George W. Bush have launched a national fundraising campaign, setting aside partisan and political differences in the face of tragedy. Three thousand American troops have arrived in Haiti since the earthquake, providing security for the distribution of aid. On Sunday, Canadian Defence Minister Peter MacKay ordered the deployment of an additional 1,000 soldiers to the relief effort.
Abraham Lincoln once said, “I feel how weak and fruitless must be any words of mine which should attempt to beguile you from the grief of a loss so overwhelming.” Words alone will not alleviate the suffering, nor will any amount of humanitarian aid undo this disaster. However, we must do everything we can to aid in the reconstruction process and help Haiti on the long road to recovery.
McGill joins Blair foundation
Last month, McGill University became an official partner of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation and a committed member to the foundation’s Faith and Globalization Initiative.
Founded in 2008 by former British prime minister Tony Blair, the foundation seeks to cultivate respect and cooperation among the world’s major religions, as well as to work with religious groups on development projects and education programs.
The foundation’s Faith and Globalization Initiative focusses on researching the ways in which the boundaries between religions have impeded efforts to combat poverty and other maladies.
McGill is the fourth university to partner with the foundation, joining Yale, Durham University in England, and the National University of Singapore. Research at McGill under the initiative will focus on faith issues relevant to Canada, such as the faith of indigenous peoples and the connection between faith and human rights.
“I’m really quite energized about the initiative,” said Ellen Aitken, dean of the faculty of religious studies. “I think it’s a very exciting partnership for McGill that has a lot of exciting possibilities for students, for the research community, and for McGill’s connections to universities and others worldwide.”
According to Aitken, the university is planning a variety of events designed to engage the surrounding community, such as public lectures, research conferences, and campus-wide events.
McGill is also developing a new multi-disciplinary program of study, including a new course for undergraduates. The course will be open to approximately 120 students and will explore the links between globalization and the world’s religions.
“There are a lot of students at McGill who really see an understanding of the world’s religions as crucial to being an effective and innovative member in today’s society, in whatever they choose to do in the future,” Aitken said.
The program delves into the principal issues addressed by the Tony Blair Faith Foundation, as well as establishing connections such as internships for undergraduates, with the organization.
“At this point the horizon is wide,” Aitken said. “A lot is possible. The foundation is deeply committed to working with all the ideas we generate from here, and our partnership with other universities, people and communities will just add to the capacity we have here at McGill.”
Talking to John F. Burns, the globetrotting foreign correspondent
On a Saturday evening several weeks ago, John F. Burns and I filed into King’s College, Cambridge, for evening services. Burns, the chief foreign correspondent for The New York Times, does not seem at first glance like a particularly religious man. The 65-year-old McGill graduate is a tall man, solidly built, with a mop of curly, light grey hair and a white beard. In the years he has spent reporting abroad, Burns has filed stories from some of the world’s most disparate and dangerous locales – everywhere from Afghan mountaintops to armoured Land Rovers in Bosnia. But when you lead such an unpredictable life, he told me, there is something comforting about attending services every so often.
From Britain to McGill
Born in 1944 to a South African father and an English mother, Burns grew up attending British boarding schools, an experience he seems to have both valued and detested.
“The headmasters and housemasters at private schools in this country in the 1950s were running dictatorships,” he said during a recent interview in Cambridge, comparing the atmosphere in the repressive societies in which he reported later in life.
Just after his graduation from secondary school, Burns’ father, an officer in the Royal Air Force, accepted a posting in Vancouver. Though he had already secured a place at Pembroke College, Cambridge, Burns decided to take a gap year with his parents in Canada.
“Having been through a British boys’ school that had changed little since the time of Dickens, I felt the moment I stepped on shore in Canada like I’d found freedom,” Burns said, adding that he met his first serious girlfriend in Canada that year. “I loved it, absolutely loved it, and nothing was going to bring me back to [Britain].”
Startling his mother, whose family had attended Cambridge for generations, Burns instead decided to enrol at McGill, where he studied political science and economics.
Charles Taylor, the eminent political philosopher and current emeritus professor, was Burns’ chief intellectual influence while he was at McGill, lecturing Burns and other admiring students on Locke, Hobbes, and Milton.
“We loved him. We would have done anything for him,” Burns said. “What I learned in the classroom at McGill from Charles Taylor has informed my entire personal and professional life.”
An Unlikely Journalist
It was in the McGill library that Burns first read The New York Times, which turned him into a voracious newspaper reader. Burns persuaded an editor at the now-defunct Ottawa Journal to give him a week’s trial as a reporter one summer.
“I got involved in interesting stories and I loved it and I thought every single day I spent in the newsroom was more interesting than any day I’d spent in the university library,” he said. “That’s how I got into this business.”
After a stint reporting for the Ottawa Citizen following his graduation from McGill, Burns was recruited by The Globe and Mail, where he became a parliamentary correspondent covering Pierre Trudeau’s government.
In 1970, Quebec separatists ignited the October Crisis by kidnapping James Cross, the British trade commissioner, and Pierre Laporte, the Quebec government’s minister of labour. On one particularly tense day, Burns became embroiled in a confrontation with Trudeau’s press secretary, Romeo LeBlanc, as he was rushing to ask the prime minister a question.
“He accused me of eavesdropping, and I said, ‘No, I’m not eavesdropping, I’m trying to get the prime minister.’ Trudeau, hearing this, turned around – and he punched me. Knocked me over into an overstuffed armchair.”
In the confusion that followed, security ejected Burns from Parliament and stripped him of his press credentials. Though these were eventually reinstated, The Globe and Mail’s editors chose to reassign Burns to China.
Oddly enough, Burns and Trudeau met again in 1973 when the prime minister made his historic visit to China. Trudeau, remembering the young reporter he had hit three years earlier, asked Burns to ride with him for the duration of his visit. Burns agreed, and the men spent the next two days talking.
With a laugh, Trudeau asked him what had happened after the incident during the October Crisis. “Well,” Burns replied, “you punched me in the nose, and you changed my life.”
On Assignment for The Times
After Burns had spent several years in China, A.M. Rosenthal, the Canadian-born managing editor at The New York Times, took notice of his work. One article in particular, entitled “1,001 Ways to Lie in China,” which described the duplicitous nature of the Chinese bureaucracy, caught Rosenthal’s eye. He offered Burns a job in New York, and in 1975, Burns reluctantly accepted.
Burns was convinced that he wouldn’t make it at the Times when he took the job, even staying in a hotel rather than finding an apartment because he did not believe the job would last. One night in 1975, however, he got his break. According to Burns, he was standing at the elevators at The Times waiting to leave when the city editor told him to get to LaGuardia Airport. “Something’s happened,” the editor said. “Sounds like an explosion.”
Burns raced to LaGuardia through heavy traffic and leapt out of his cab a mile from the airport, scaling a fence and sprinting across the tarmac in the rain toward the terminal. Once inside, he found a payphone and called his editors, describing the chaotic scene. Police were everywhere. Several people were dead, and others were injured. After several hours of chasing through the airport and the local hospitals, an exhausted Burns returned to the Times, convinced he’d botched the assignment.
“When I walked into the newsroom, people on the metro desk applauded,” Burns recalled. “I thought, ‘This is some sort of a joke.'”
It wasn’t. His telephoned reports had been rewritten into a front-page story with a banner headline, which ran under his by-line though Burns hadn’t technically written a word of it. The editors congratulated him on the piece and, according to Burns, his career at the newspaper turned around.
Sarajevo, Afghanistan, and Beyond
Over the next decade and a half, Burns reported for The Times from many far-flung locales. In 1991, he was assigned to Sarajevo to cover the escalating war in the Balkans.
By May 1992, however, the United Nations and the foreign press corps had decided to evacuate Sarajevo, as thousands of artillery shells hammered the city. Burns reluctantly joined the exodus, but stopped when the convoy reached the outskirts of the city.
“As soon as we were gone, the Serbs, who were shelling the city, thinking that they’d put out the eyes of the world, redoubled their attacks,” Burns said. “Within 24 hours of our leaving, the city was on fire. And I thought, ‘This can’t be right.’ So I filled my car with food, and I drove back in there.”
Burns couldn’t believe what he saw as he returned: burning cars with dead bodies in them, breadlines hit by artillery shells, soccer stadiums turned into cemeteries. Though he initially intended to stay only an additional weekend, Burns found shelter with a local family and decided he had a duty to remain in Sarajevo.
After several more weeks in Sarajevo, Burns lost touch with his editors at The Times, who had ordered him out of the city. “For three months, four months, I was the only journalist there,” he said. “The whole press corps was gone.”
At the end of the year, however, an editor at The Times contacted him and asked him to write one final story about what he’d seen that year – usually a sign that a reporter’s work is being considered for the Pulitzer Prize. According to Burns, he filed the story from his armoured Land Rover in the middle of the night, praying a Serbian soldier wouldn’t fire at the glow from his laptop. In 1993, he won the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting.
In the following years, Burns reported from both Afghanistan, where he won a second Pultizer
for his coverage of the rise of the Taliban, and Iraq, where he spent five years covering the American invasion and the sectarian fighting that followed. In 2007, Burns finally returned to Britain after 45 years abroad to take a post as The Times’ London bureau chief.
Though he admits to missing some of the thrills of life abroad – flying low over the mountains of Afghanistan in a military helicopter, for instance – Burns appears content to be back in Britain. If nothing else, he can now attend evensong at the King’s College chapel at Cambridge.
AMUSE gains accreditation
After a year and a half of campaigning, the Association of McGill University Support Employees, the organization composed of McGill’s 3,000 casual workers, has unionized and affiliated with the Public Service Alliance of Canada.
The campaign, which began in September 2008, started when a group of undergraduate students in the McGill work study program felt they needed a union structure to balance their working conditions with those of the represented colleagues.
After considering several possible representative bodies, AMUSE organizers chose the PSAC, also known in French as the Alliance de la Fonction publique du Canada. Although the exact figure is not public, AMUSE collected signatures from the 35 to 50 per cent of eligible card signing members necessary to move to an official vote. Conducted by mail in ballot beginning October fifth, the poll saw approximately 85 per cent of voters recommend in favour of joining the PSAC. Abstentions were treated as votes in negation.
“This new bargaining unit is huge,” said Véroninque Allard, leading campaign representative from the PSAC. “It is really a major change. You already have on campus [McGill University Non-Academic Certified Association], but when these people go on sick leave or parental leave, or when a job position becomes vacant, it is replaced be a casual worker. [This worker] is accomplishing exactly the same tasks, same job title, but these people were not unionized before.”
Allard emphasized that the distinction between student and worker should never be confused.
“Our student status should never be confused with our worker status; it is not the same,” said Allard. “Sometimes, because we are so keen to work on campus and we need to work on campus because we can’t get by with student loans, the work on campus becomes a part of our education. We tend to forget that it is a job and accept working conditions that are unfair.”
Casual workers who will now be unionized include campus tour guides, athletic centre employees, food service workers, and temporary secretaries. Because AMUSE is exclusive to non-academic workers, teaching assistants are not included under the organization.
“It is an exciting result with the massive amount of support that came out, but we were not expecting much else given the amount of support that we have received up until now,” said Max Silverman, AMUSE student volunteer and Tribune columnist.
Despite the inevitable high turnover rate of temporary employees, particularly undergraduate students, Silverman believes that widespread support across various positions indicates the need for workers to organize.
“The diversity of the field that still all gave positive support … shows me, at least, that the workers may change year to year but the issues are still there and the issues stay the same,” said Silverman, who previously served as the Students’ Society vice president external. “Therefore I have no doubt that even if there has been a lot of turnover, the new people who are there are going to see this as just as valuable as [those before].”
Silverman also believes that although a wide variety of positions are covered under the agreement, the common need for representation of casual workers creates a shared interest.
Before negotiations over a collective bargaining agreement with McGill commence, AMUSE must still assemble executive and bargaining committees, establish operating bylaws, and agree internally upon demands.
The PSAC now represents roughly 19,000 workers across eight Quebec Universities.
