Latest News

Facebook Like Dislike button
a, Opinion

Commentary: The polarizing impact of Facebook events

The Winter General Assembly (GA) produced a large turnout and generated passionate debate, prior to and after the vote, mostly due to the proposed “Motion Regarding Divestment from Companies Profiting from the Illegal Occupation of the Palestinian Territories.” While political discussions on campus may have taken up a lot of space in recent weeks, the voices of many students are left unheard.

With McGill’s student population of roughly 27,000 undergraduates, it’s difficult but extremely important to have a representative vote. There should be less of a focus on who votes for what at assemblies, and more of a focus on actually getting students to vote. A big part of the political apathy and ambivalence seen on campus is due to social media, specifically polarizing Facebook events titled “Vote Yes for XYZ” or “Vote No” that exclude students who have not yet formed an opinion on an issue.

Since these Facebook events are often emotionally charged, this pushes a significant number of students away from participating in the discussion and the vote. When someone isn’t informed about an issue on campus, they won’t take the time to vote. When a student is unsure of how to vote, such events discourage an open dialogue and make it difficult for students to find unbiased information about the issue at hand. Students may feel uncomfortable asking for information about political debates from their peers who are so emotionally invested in the issues. Students should feel like they fit in on campus and these events leave many undecided voters in an awkward in-between space, with very little guidance on how to form an opinion on the issue.

If SSMU wants a vote that is representative of the opinions of the student body, it should find a better way to provide students with detailed information on the issues, thereby allowing them to make an informed decision and exercise their democratic right.

It may be argued that it is easier than ever to find information and it is the student’s responsibility to be proactive in doing this. The internet can without a doubt be used as a vital tool in self-education and forming an opinion, but it can also be used to promote biased information depending on the source. In addition, students may feel unmotivated, apprehensive to involve themselves in a polarized issue, or that their voice may not matter when there are plenty of other students deeply involved in the issue, advocating for either side. In order to convince students who are undecided to vote, this motivation needs to be fuelled by education. Politically motivated Facebook events allow for many students to be on either end of the spectrum—either extremely invested in the issue, or entirely apathetic. If the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) wants a vote that is representative of the opinions of the student body, it should find a better way to provide students with detailed information on the issues, thereby allowing them to make an informed decision and exercise their democratic right.

While it can be important to share one’s views, not all students are comfortable publicizing their political stance on Facebook. Students should feel comfortable sharing their opinions but sometimes, especially in the last GA, these views can cause individuals to feel marginalized or judged on campus.

While SSMU did have a general Facebook event for this GA, it should focus on mobilizing students who wouldn’t usually attend or vote. Since some students may not have much background information on certain issues, it could be beneficial for SSMU to post shorter summaries of the motions online for students to read and post links to scholarly articles or events for undecided students, instead of relying on the influence of Facebook rants by their peers. The solution should be a proper education on the political debates on campus, and once students are educated and motivated, then this would hopefully result in a more representative vote.

ethan hawke and seymour bernstein
a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

10,000 hours in 84 minutes

Seymour: An Introduction, the new documentary from actor/director Ethan Hawke, focuses on pianist Seymour Bernstein, but it’s really an in-depth look at the search for greatness. Without taking attention away from Bernstein, who’s given a treatment bordering on hagiographic—and deservedly so—the film becomes a guide to those seeking answers to life’s questions, and it’s difficult to imagine him wanting it any other way.

The approach makes sense given how the film came to fruition, which Hawke explains at the start of a performance by Bernstein, snippets of which are interspersed throughout. Despite a storied career which included four Oscar nominations and a series of critically acclaimed collaborations with director Richard Linklater, the actor found himself questioning the direction and purpose of his art. His friend Anthony Zito (credited on Seymour as an executive producer) invited him over for dinner, and it was there that he met Bernstein. 

Bernstein, as the film tells us, was a successful concert pianist whose professional credits included a hugely acclaimed performance at Alice Tully Hall. Despite his achievements as a performer, he quit his career at the age of 50 after a quiet farewell concert in order to teach full-time. He’d had enough of the stress and excess which too often accompany a performance career, and he sought to live a simpler life.

Hawke gives the viewer a few more of Bernstein’s biographical details, including a particularly moving section where he recounts his time serving in the Korean War, but the emphasis is more on his approach to music, education, and life. He shows Bernstein working with a range of students in master class and private lesson settings, which give a hint of his impressive abilities as a teacher.

His educational talents are far from limited to musical instruction, as the film continuously reminds us. Hawke decided to make the film due to the invaluable role Bernstein ended up playing in his own life as a mentor, and both musicians and non-musicians alike will undoubtedly find lessons to learn from him. His wise words about music almost always apply to any art form, and even the most music-specific of his comments suggest a dedication to his craft from which anyone looking for a role model can learn.

Seymour also functions as a guide for the confused; it’s far from a pedantic bore. Bernstein himself has a funny, charismatic, and engaging presence, and Hawke wisely stays out of his way for most of the film. He lets us see Bernstein interact with students, peers, and admirers from various disciplines, and that’s more than enough to keep the film compelling for the course of its brief, but powerful 84-minute running time.

The range of settings in which we witness him isn’t organized with any discernible logic (aside from ending the film with Bernstein’s performance of Schumann’s “Fantasie” at the concert organized by Hawke), but it doesn’t take away from the film’s impact. Images and tales from the pianist’s youth are interspersed with footage of him practicing seemingly at random, but it all makes sense together somehow. The collage-like style provides a kaleidoscope view of Bernstein, and it’s effective for evoking his eternally sunny, youthful nature without cordoning off the different periods in his life.

Bernstein’s jovial but firm approach to music education is a helpful corrective to the one suggested by last year’s Whiplash. In that film, the dictatorial band director Fletcher berates his students into success with questionable results. By contrast, Bernstein is no less demanding, but his strictness appears to come from a genuine desire for the student to succeed, rather than Fletcher’s apparent hatred. His vast array of disciples learn far more than any of the budding musicians in Whiplash did, and, for 84 minutes, viewers of Seymour become his pupils, too.

a, News, SSMU

Alexei Simakov files J-Board petition against Elections SSMU

Alexei Simakov, former Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) presidential candidate, filed a petition on Thursday to the Judicial Board (J-Board), SSMU’s judicial branch. The petition calls for the J-Board to file sanctions against Kareem Ibrahim, incoming SSMU President.

“Alexei Simakov over the course of the campaign was libeled repeatedly both by members of candidate Ibrahim’s campaign team and by Ibrahim himself,” the petition reads. “We therefore request that sanctions and/or demerit points, with associated deductions towards candidate Ibrahim’s campaign budget cap, are issued with respect to the precedents set by [Chief Elections Officer (CEO)] during the election.”

J-Board Chief Justice Muna Tojiboeva confirmed that the case has been accepted.

“Alexei Simakov’s petition is within our jurisdiction so we have accepted the petition—we will be having a hearing,” she said. “We are following the standard J-Board internal rules of procedure with how we are processing the petition.”

According to Simakov, Elections SSMU’s CEO Rachelle Bastarache did not adequately address a slanderous post on the Facebook event page for Ibrahim’s campaign. 

“[Ibrahim] responded by posting on his event page, accusing me of orchestrating the leaks—he accused me of violating his privacy and hacking his Facebook,” Simakov claimed, referring to screenshots of a private Facebook conversation discussing Tariq Khan’s candidacy for SSMU President in the 2014 SSMU elections.

Simakov added that Bastarache did ask Ibrahim to take the message down. 

“[Ibrahim] complied with this request [… but] he issued no apology, no recantation of the statements,” Simakov explained. “The CEO took no disciplinary actions whatsoever, despite the fact that this is a clearly false accusation […. Bastarache’s] defence is that [Ibrahim] was in an exasperated state of mind after this leaked.”

Ibrahim stated that he had been sanctioned by Elections SSMU and highlighted the differences between his response to the leaked Facebook messages and an earlier incident during which Simakov was sanctioned after a member of his campaign team posted defamatory pictures on Ibrahim’s Facebook event page.

“I was sanctioned […but] I was not given any financial [penalties],” Ibrahim explained. “While [Simakov’s] campaign manager posted two inappropriate memes on my Facebook event […] I simply liked a post on my own event which read ‘Voting for you because the other guy is a stain. Keep on keeping on,’ which I saw as a message of support which I sought to validate. The magnitude of these infractions are evidently different, which is why […] I simply received demerit points.”

Bastarache stated that Elections SSMU had received and reviewed a petition for an invalidation of Ibrahim’s win from Simakov regarding this issue.

“After an informal consultation with [the Electoral Review Committee] members, we deemed that the action by [Ibrahim] did not warrant the consideration of invalidation of an election,” she said. “We felt that our prior actions in those cases were appropriate.” 

Bastarache explained why the sanctions against candidates are not made publicly available.

“It should be known that the sanctionable actions and sanctions received do not become public knowledge until 12 demerit points are received,” she said. “No candidate other than Lola Baraldi has had their sanctions revealed to the public.”

Simakov added that he hopes this issue will be quickly resolved.

“We’re seeking that the J-Board […] responds to validate our reasonably clear concerns with a well-established basis […] and [rectifies] the situation,” he said. “This will give the student body faith that the elections office isn’t completely dysfunctional [….] Hopefully, they’ll respond positively, constructively, and we can have a very short J-Board [case].”

a, McGill, News

SACOMSS hosts McGill’s Sexual Assault Awareness Week

The Sexual Assault Centre of the McGill Students' Society (SACOMSS) hosted McGill’s Sexual Assault Awareness Week, which consisted of a series of workshops, from March 16 to 20. The week included events such as the “Becoming an Active Bystander” workshop and “Fire with Water,” an art show depicting artistic responses to sexual violence. There were also two “Know Your Policy” workshops, which explained McGill’s current policy on sexual harassment as well as the Sexual Assault Policy proposal. 

Vice-President University Affairs Claire Stewart-Kanigan, who has been liaising between the university administration and the Sexual Assault Policy working group, co-hosted the workshop. The working group has been developing a draft of a new policy on sexual assault since Fall 2013.

Stewart-Kanigan pointed out during the workshop that addressing sexual assault requires proactive measures, which the policy aims to introduce. 

“People who have experienced sexual assault do not have a clear path to follow for seeking recourse or support at the university,” she said. “There are places you can go—you could bring your concern to the Dean of Students or you could speak to counselling. But in terms of having a clear path for people who have experienced sexual assault to both get information on what their options are and access channels that are sensitized to deal with their specific concerns and needs, [those] are not available on campus right now.”

Stewart-Kanigan added that she felt the current policies in place, including the harassment policy and the Code of Student Conduct, were not adequate to address the issue of sexual assault, as it doesn’t spell out the specific rights of the person who experiences sexual assault and the actions needed to address this issue. 

“The Code of Student Conduct […] is the same code that would be applied if you got into a physical fight with someone or [if] you cheated on an exam,” she said. “The code is not appropriate as it does not spell out the specific rights of the person who experiences sexual assault and the actions needed to address this issue. Since sexual assault in its nature is extremely different from other violations covered under the Code of Student Conduct, the writers felt the need to formulate McGill's Sexual Assault Policy.”

The Sexual Assault Policy proposal acknowledges that sexual assault must be dealt with not only through punitive measures but also by creating a culture of consent on campus and a university-wide commitment.
“By taking a pro-active stance, the policy aims to outline not only how to respond, but also how to address sexual assault before it happens,” explained U1 Arts student and fellow workshop facilitator, Lucie Jane, who has been closely involved with the working group. “An effective example of a proactive action would be the recruitment of the Harm Reduction Liaison Officer, Bianca Tétrault, whose position entails organizing campaigns and educational workshops in order to make McGill a safer space.”

The policy has a pro-survivor approach allowing for self-definition, which would give survivors the freedom to define their experiences themselves and ensure consent at all stages of dealing with their experiences while maintaining complete confidentiality. 

“Its non-directional approach not only ensures that resources and information are accessible to the person who has experienced sexual assault, but also allows them to take any course of action they may want to take,” said working group member and U2 student Rebecca Dales, who also helped to facilitate the workshop.

A concern regarding the policy in general has been whether it would undermine the criminal justice system and seek to replace it. Stewart-Kanigan asserted that this would not be the case. 

“This policy is not intended to replace the criminal justice system; [rather] it is creating a localized option to access support, safety measures, and recourse within the immediate community,” she said.

So far, the policy has gained support from organizations like SACOMSS and the McGill branch of the Quebec Public Interest Research Group (QPIRG) which is a non-profit, student-run organization that works on environmental and social justice issues at McGill and in the Montreal community. It has also been endorsed by the Law Students’ Association, the Engineering Undergraduate Society, and the Arts Undergraduate Society. 

“We are hoping to bring it to several other faculty associations in the next couple of weeks and are seeking to have it on the agenda for information in April and for approval by the Senate by the end of the academic year,” said Stewart-Kanigan.

U0 Management student Siddhi Kapadia, who attended the workshop, said that she was impressed by the clear and wide-ranging measures stated in the policy. 

“It provides an option on campus for people who have experienced sexual assault for whom the criminal justice system is inaccessible,” she said. “Not only does this student-led initiative reflect the practical problems faced by people who have experienced sexual assault, but [it] also aims to build a preventative mechanism in order to make McGill a safer space for students.” 

SSMU Building at McGill
a, News, SSMU

Newly-elected VP Internal Lola Baraldi will not be invalidated, Elections SSMU announces

Elections SSMU announced on Thursday that  allegations of illegal campaigning by Lola Baraldi prior to her election as Vice-President Internal did not constitute sufficient grounds for invalidation, as ruled by the Elections Review Committee (ERC). 

The VP Internal race was the closest in the 2015 Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) elections, with Baraldi winning over opponent Johanna Nikoletos by 13 votes. 

Nikoletos explained that she filed a petition with Elections SSMU on March 23, asking them to convene the ERC in order to invalidate the results of the VP Internal election. According to Nikoletos, Baraldi illegally campaigned at the café in the lobby of New Residence Hall, a McGill residence, on March 14.

“Once the election results were announced last Friday, individuals started to come forward with testimonies about illegal campaigning that they witnessed,” Nikoletos said. “Some of the testimonies we heard from residents of the building included hearing […] Lou Lou, the café worker, campaigning on Baraldi’s behalf. Some testimonies included individuals who were also given free food by Baraldi.”

Baraldi refuted allegations that she had bribed students with food. She continued to explain that she was present in a non-candidate capacity at New Residence Hall on March 14.

“I was indeed hanging out in the New Residence lobby and at the café, where I’ve been going for the past three years, not for any campaigning purposes whatsoever—although a New Residence Hall Council member was present with me throughout most of the night and aware of my presence there,” she said. “I was helping work the cash, which I often do […]  in my capacity as a student helping out an employee on her last night working in residence. I did not benefit from this position nor abuse its status to campaign, nor did I initiate any conversations regarding my campaign or my platform.”

On Saturday, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Elections SSMU published a report summarizing the results of its investigations into the alleged infractions.

“Based on the evidence before us at that time, the ERC determined that an infraction had occurred,” the report reads. “Candidate Baraldi has violated the stipulations of By-law 3.3 (designation of a single bulletin board in residence) by allowing a poster to be placed on the counter for a period of 2.5/3 hours; Candidate Baraldi allowed New Residence Café worker Louise Smith, a non-SSMU member, to campaign on her behalf in violation of By-law 14.5 while the poster was on the counter; Candidate Baraldi did not charge one or two people for their purchases.”

The report also outlined sanctions placed on Baraldi in light of the infractions.

“The resulting sanction that we have deemed appropriate for the confirmed infringements is the publishing of this report as a public censure of Lola Baraldi for her actions on March 14, 2015 and denying Lola Baraldi reimbursement for her financial expenses,” the report reads.

Baraldi was not sanctioned for providing food to students free of charge.

“Though we believe Ms. Baraldi did not charge one or two people for their purchases, we do not have any conclusive evidence that this was conducted for the purposes of promoting her candidacy and sanctioning Ms. Baraldi for a lapse in judgment is beyond the scope of Election SSMU’s jurisdiction,” the report stated.

Baraldi also addressed her eligibility to serve as an executive given her international student status, another subject of contention.

“I actually brought this up with the Dean of Students and International Student Services, who told me […] that I could carry a part-time course load if my part-time studies are due to an elected position with a student association,” Baraldi said. 

Baraldi expressed that she would maintain transparency throughout any further investigation of the matter.

“The allegations of slate campaigning are not valid and have all been repudiated by Elections SSMU,” Baraldi said. “Ultimately, I am happy to provide further documentation, testimonials, and evidence for any doubts regarding the legitimacy of my campaign, as I am fully confident that it was a clean campaign.”

Convention of the ERC is outlined in SSMU Bylaw book 1, article 31.1, which was added to the bylaw book this January.

“[The CEO shall immediately call for the meeting of the Electoral Review Committee…] in the case that a disqualification of a candidate or referendum committee, or the invalidation of an Election of a successful candidate or Referendum question, is to be considered,” the article reads.

According to the bylaws, the CEO has the ability to make a final decision on the petition.

“The CEO and the [deputy electoral officer] shall seek the consultation of the Electoral Review Committee, however, they shall retain the full authority vested in them by the Constitution and By-Laws to make decisions regarding elections,” article 31.4 reads. “The Electoral Review Committee shall rule on whether or not particular infractions have occurred and Elections SSMU shall rule as to the sanctions or resources that are to be undertaken in response to the infractions.” 

Nikoletos stated that she is planning to appeal the ERC’s decision through the SSMU Judicial Board (J-Board), the judicial branch of SSMU.

“I am disappointed with the decision by Elections SSMU,” she said. “My team and I will be pursuing a J-Board case against Elections SSMU for failing to uphold [its] mandate of ensuring a fair election in accordance with the SSMU bylaws.”

According to the SSMU bylaws, Nikoletos will have five days to submit a petition to the J-Board.

World

Dubai Police fine 388 vehicles for excess load

This is some dummy copy. You’re not really supposed to read this dummy copy, it is just a place holder for people who need some type to visualize what the actual copy might look like if it were real content.

If you want to read, I might suggest a good book, perhaps Hemingway or Melville. That’s why they call it, the dummy copy. This, of course, is not the real copy for this entry. Rest assured, the words will expand the concept. With clarity. Conviction. And a little wit.

In today’s competitive market environment, the body copy of your entry must lead the reader through a series of disarmingly simple thoughts.

All your supporting arguments must be communicated with simplicity and charm. And in such a way that the reader will read on. (After all, that’s a reader’s job: to read, isn’t it?) And by the time your readers have reached this point in the finished copy, you will have convinced them that you not only respect their intelligence, but you also understand their needs as consumers.

As a result of which, your entry will repay your efforts. Take your sales; simply put, they will rise. Likewise your credibility. There’s every chance your competitors will wish they’d placed this entry, not you. While your customers will have probably forgotten that your competitors even exist. Which brings us, by a somewhat circuitous route, to another small point, but one which we feel should be raised.

Long copy or short – You decide

As a marketer, you probably don’t even believe in body copy. Let alone long body copy. (Unless you have a long body yourself.) Well, truth is, who‘s to blame you? Fact is, too much long body copy is dotted with such indulgent little phrases like truth is, fact is, and who’s to blame you. Trust us: we guarantee, with a hand over our heart, that no such indulgent rubbish will appear in your entry. That’s why God gave us big blue pencils. So we can expunge every example of witted waffle.

For you, the skies will be blue, the birds will sing, and your copy will be crafted by a dedicated little man whose wife will be sitting at home, knitting, wondering why your entry demands more of her husband‘s time than it should.

But you will know why, won‘t you? You will have given her husband a chance to immortalize himself in print, writing some of the most persuasive prose on behalf of a truly enlightened purveyor of widgets. And so, while your dedicated reader, enslaved to each mellifluous paragraph, clutches his newspaper with increasing interest and intention to purchase, you can count all your increased profits and take pots of money to your bank. Sadly, this is not the real copy for this entry. But it could well be. All you have to do is look at the account executive sitting across your desk (the fellow with the lugubrious face and the calf-like eyes), and say ”Yes! Yes! Yes!“ And anything you want, body copy, dinners, women, will be yours. Couldn’t be fairer than that, could we?

a, Science & Technology

Montreal amongst cities hosting brain awareness week

Montreal’s Brain Awareness Week began in 1996 with the help of a group of neuroscience students at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute in Verdun in response to the formation of the U.S.-based Dana Alliance for Brain Initiatives. 

Today, the organization is operated by McGill, Concordia, l’Université de Montréal, and UQÁM. With 300 presentations in over 150 schools, both anglo- and francophone, Montreal’s Brain Awareness Week has become a well-established presence in elementary and high schools throughout the island.

Brain Awareness Week’s mission is to increase public awareness about the brain and to inspire interest in brain research.

“Our mandate is […] to tell people of all ages and social structures about why brain research is important for health, and to get people excited about it,” explained Carelton University psychology professor Alfonso Abizaid.

Montreal’s Brain Awareness Week focuses its resources on elementary and high school students. Brain Awareness Week aims to debunk myths about boring science careers and offers kids a chance to see older students who are passionate about the brain.

“We target kids—though not exclusively—so that from an early age they start understanding how the brain works,” said Abizaid. “[We’re] getting them excited for that particular topic so that when they get older they have neuroscience [in their heads] as an option for their studies.”

The success of Montreal’s Brain Awareness Week is based on its core of student volunteers. At elementary schools, student volunteers explain the basics of the brain’s processing of the five senses. At the high school level, volunteers present a PowerPoint called “Drugs and the Brain.”

“I like that it’s not preachy,” explained Brain Awareness Montreal President Clara Bolster-Foucault.

The presentation covers everything from marijuana to cocaine to ecstasy. It offers a physiological explanation for behaviour and long-term effects based on drug-affected neurotransmission in the brain. At the end of the presentation, the volunteers bring out a preserved cow brain that the students in the classroom can touch and hold with gloved hands. The demonstration offers a hands-on approach to neuroscience.

“Students who I meet now that are volunteering say that they wish they had it around when they were [high school] students,” explained Kelly Hennegan, vice-president of the anglophone high school volunteering branch for Brain Awareness Week.

Hennegan and her co-vice-president are in charge of organizing student volunteers to visit anglophone high schools in the area. Throughout this year’s Brain Awareness Week, they have organized 65 presentations in high schools on and off the island.

“There’s a lot to coordinate,” Hennegan admitted. “It was definitely a lot more than I anticipated. You have to relinquish some control and delegate to others. But it’s nice to be a part of something that big.”

Brain Awareness Week is a part of the larger organization called Brain Awareness Montreal. Brain Awareness Montreal sponsors other activities including Brain-B, a neuroscience trivia competition for kids, an open house at the Montreal Neurological Institute, and Sci-Cafés.

“We started an outreach campaign for adults called Sci-Café,” explained Bolster-Foucault. “We have three of them every year and they are basically panel discussions on neuroscience topics.” 

Past topics have included schizophrenia, sex and attachment, addiction, and concussions. The next Sci-Café will take place on April 8.

With brain research as the main tenet of Brain Awareness Week, Carleton professor Abizaid offers some advice on how to get started.

“Some people may be more interested in human research, others may be more interested in animal research or cellular or molecular lab work,” explained Abizaid. “It’s nice to gain some experience in both so that you can decide what it is you’re more passionate about. And when you find that passion, don’t let it go.” 

a, News, SSMU

Kareem Ibrahim wins SSMU presidency

Kareem Ibrahim was elected president of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) last week with 52.5 per cent of the vote. The results were released by Elections SSMU last Friday.

Alexei Simakov, the opposing candidate, gained 47.5 per cent of the vote.

The rest of the SSMU executive will be comprised of Vice-President (VP) Clubs & Services Kimber Bialik, VP University Affairs Chloe Rourke, VP Finance & Operations Zacheriah Houston, and VP Internal Lola Baraldi.

With no nominated candidates for the VP External position in the initial campaign period, a nomination period for the by-election to fill the VP External position also concluded at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, with Emily Boytinck and Joanna Schacter as the two announced candidates. Campaigning for the position will conclude Saturday, March 27 at 5:00 p.m.

After a particularly heated campaign period, 25.9 per cent of students in SSMU voted in the election. 

Ibrahim stated that he was excited to assume the position of president next year. 

“I’ve been dedicated to student life […] at McGill from the beginning and I’m really thrilled that the majority of students have once again [shown] their confidence in me to continue [taking] that kind of role,” he said. “I can’t wait for next year to be able to put student ideas into effect.”

Ibrahim continued to underscore the importance of student engagement.

“[Both] races were very close for the contested elections, so I definitely think that we’re going to have to do some work in terms of reaching out to students [who] may not have had as much confidence in us as candidates and making sure that their voices are heard as well,” he said. 

Simakov expressed sadness at the loss, but also highlighted that he was proud of his campaign team.

“We’re disappointed obviously,” Simakov said. “We thought we had it in the last few days. We came here not having been really prepared to run. We didn’t really know what we were doing and I think given the conditions, given our experience […] I take a lot of pride in what we did.”

Simakov also emphasized that he would continue to advocate for students who feel that they are not represented by the current executives.  

“I guess the vote is that the current status quo is [working] for people and they’re going to support that,” Simakov said. “Whatever happens to me, I’m going to keep fighting for the student body of McGill. I’m hoping that I became a voice for some of the student demographic that does feel alienated or don’t feel represented by the current administration.” 

Simakov also raised his concerns with student participation in the election. 

“If you look at […] my event page […] public sentiment really was behind it,” Simakov said. “But […] we definitely had to do a better job of making sure people came out to vote and we didn’t, so that’s something we have to consider.” 

Uncontested candidates Bialik, Rourke, and Houston received strong support in the election, with both Bialik and Rourke receiving 89.4 per cent of the vote, and Houston receiving 86.2 per cent. Baraldi was elected to the VP Internal position by 13 votes over  opponent Johanna Nikoletos. 

Rourke underscored that she was pleased with the election results.

“I’m really excited to work with the new incoming executives, I think we’ll be a great team,” Rourke said. “We all have extensive experience with SSMU and […] we have a good understanding of the issues themselves. [Ibrahim and I] have worked together [in the] past on Senate, and I definitely think that that’ll be a good advantage […] when working with the admin going forward.”

Rourke also commented on the challenges that she believed SSMU faced moving forward.

“I think that people have […] had an image of SSMU [where] it’s not relevant to students [and] doesn’t communicate well with students,” she said. “I think that seeing an executive team all [comprised of] people [who] have been previously involved with SSMU might suggest that nothing will change, and I really hope that that’s not the case. I think that we all came in with the idea that using our experience at SSMU, we do want to make changes, and I hope that we’re able to do that.”

a, Know Your Athlete, Martlets, Sports

Know your McGill Athlete: Katie Caldwell

“When you swim for McGill, it’s all about what you do for the team,” Katie Caldwell, captain of the Martlet Swimming team, said. “I really enjoy that […] aspect of […] having that whole team behind you and scoring points for your team.”

Caldwell has experienced a lot during her McGill career. She was the RSEQ Rookie-of-the-Year in the 2012-2013 season before enduring a frustrating and injury-riddled sophomore year. She rebounded in 2014-2015 as captain of the Martlets and led them to a strong showing at the 2015 CIS Nationals. McGill placed ninth out of 23 teams, with 12 personal-best times. Caldwell took home the Martlets’ only medal with a bronze in the 400m individual medley. Coach Peter Carpenter, per McGill Athletics, called it “one of the most courageous efforts I have ever been a part of,” given Katie’s past injuries.

Despite that adversity, Caldwell has stepped up as a captain, and has cherished the responsibility of leading this year.

“You take on more of a role in showing leadership and a positive attitude,” Caldwell said. “I have to be there for the team, […] especially for the newcomers—[to] show them that that they can be a part of this [amazing atmosphere] and that they [can] lead the team in a few years.”

It was this team atmosphere that helped her through the difficult 2013-2014 season, when Caldwell dealt with some of the worst injuries of her swimming career. 

“They [would] put a smile on [my] face when it [was] a bad day or [I was] hurting,” Caldwell explained. “The team is like a second family.”

The junior’s injuries caused her to reevaluate her approach to swimming. She explained that she was putting too much pressure on herself to perform as a sophomore. Rather than placing this pressure on herself again, Caldwell sought to see what she could accomplish by trying to have fun again.

“This year, I [decided to] look at it as [I] did first year—[as] a new experience […] and [to] have fun with the team,” Caldwell said. “I ended up with a bronze medal, which was fantastic considering last year was nowhere close to where I wanted to be.”

Swimming runs like water in her family, and Caldwell began her career in the pool with Pacific Seas Wolves Swimming Club in British Columbia at the age of four.

“I was very involved because my sister was already swimming and when I was born we had a pool in our back yard,” Caldwell said.

 Her older sister Hilary Caldwell, an Olympic swimmer, is someone Katie has had healthy competition with and looks up to in equal measure.

“[When] we hit the age where we both did similar events […] we got a bit competitive,” the younger Caldwell said. “It’s [gotten] to a stage where she has excelled [in her swimming career] and I […] focus on my studies more [….] Now it’s [more like] looking up to her and what she has accomplished and being proud of her.”

Out of the pool, Katie is a passionate International Development Studies student with minors in Education and Education Psychology. She sponsors a child in Cameroon and sees Africa as an exciting place of development.

“I have a big drive to go to Africa and […] be a part of the development over there,” she said. “After school, I want […] to get involved in something along those lines.”

McGill Tribune (MT): What is the weirdest thing you have ever eaten? 

 

Katie Cladwell (KC): I am a bit of a picky eater and don’t like to try weird things. I have tried conch, which some people might not consider weird […] I was in Belize and I was told it was chicken, but it wasn’t.

 

 

MT: What TV shows are you watching at the moment?

 

KC: Too many. Some of my favourites are Suits—that just ended—and Game of Thrones. Another one is Sherlock. I like British TV, it has good humour which they can’t do in America. 

 

 

MT: What toiletry would you be if you had to choose? 

 

KC:  That is a very odd question. I have never thought about that before. I was thinking about toothpaste because it feels so good when you brush your teeth and your mouth’s refreshed at the end of the day.

 

a, Features

In war-torn Middle East, freelance journalists hunt for stories and sales

Since the Arab Spring began five years ago, much of what the Western world knows about the Middle East has been produced by a new band of freelance journalists on the front lines of the world’s most dangerous conflicts. Travelling to Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Libya without the backing of major media outlets, these young journalists have little formal training or resources required to safely cover stories in the region. On a good day, they earn $70 USD for a report from the front lines of the Syrian Civil War. For young journalists reporting from the Middle East, they weigh a hazardous lifestyle with the opportunity to write and witness history as it’s being made.

 

 

Jake Simkin, 34, was a commercial photographer in Australia before deciding to become a freelance war photographer a decade ago. Although he was earning a steady income shooting music videos and commercials, Simkin was uninspired by his comfortable life in Melbourne. After a brief stint photographing victims of the tsunami in Banda Aceh, Indonesia in 2004, Simkin reassessed his career.

“I came back home and told my friends about the horrible things I had seen [after the tsunami],” Simkin explained. “I found that people in Australia were so consumed by material needs, [but] I became obsessed with the idea of wanting to know what it meant to live and experience all emotions in life.”

In 2006, Simkin booked a one-way ticket to Kabul, Afghanistan, and began his career as a freelance photojournalist in the midst of the U.S.-led war against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. Speaking only a few words of the Persian language Dari, Simkin worked with fixers—translators knowledgeable of the local terrain—to help him find and cover stories.

While many of the Western journalists were fearful of leaving the American compound at that time, Simkin rode his motorcycle all through Kabul and even into the tribal regions of the country in search of better stories. In a decade of work, Simkin has sold his photographs to the Associated Press, the Guardian, and The New York Times. 

“As a journalist, you are exposed to horrible things, but you try your best to create change,” Simkin said. “I look for hope in very difficult places. There are people who haven’t given up on life, even in Afghanistan. Their stories need to be told.”

Throughout this experience, Simkin formed invaluable relationships that continue to resonate with him. One of Simkin’s earliest friends in Afghanistan was Nowab, a street kid he taught to skateboard. 

“Nowab was [the journalists’] favourite,” Simkin recalled. “He was such a smart kid. He taught himself English.” 

One day, Nowab spotted a suicide bomber near the American compound in Kabul. As Nowab tried to report the incident to the Afghan security forces, the bomber panicked and pulled the mechanism in his suicide vest. When Simkin received a phone call notifying him of the news, he realized just how integrated his life had become with his career.

“I felt a real sense of loss for a younger brother,” Simkin said. “Nowab, like Afghanistan, had become a part of me.”

In the years since Nowab’s death, Simkin has lost many other close friends and faced life-threatening situations himself. The ubiquity of death is perhaps the only predictable part of his job. 

In Somalia last year, Simkin was riding in an ambulance when teenage Al-Shabab militants attacked the car and fired a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG), killing the driver and the medic in the front passenger’s seat. 

“I was knocked out cold and covered in blood,” Simkin recalled. “I only survived because the Al-Shabab fighters assumed I was dead.” 

He paused for a moment.

“This job certainly isn’t for everyone.”

 

 

The foreign correspondent has always had a reputation for being a daredevil. In the earlier days of print media however, the risk of conflict-zone reporting came with a daily byline, a stable staff-writer position, and a steadily accumulating 401 K. 

Today, the equation has fundamentally changed. With media outlets downsizing every year, the biggest newspapers are increasingly relying on freelancers who are cheaper to pay and require none of the traditional benefits promised to contract workers. Many argue that this hands-off relationship allows newspapers to receive the best reporting from the Middle East without covering any of the risk.

For freelancers trying to make a living, the competition is fierce. Since only a finite number of outlets are buying articles to begin with—most digital media organizations now simply aggregate existing reports—journalists are incentivized to take more dangerous risks in pursuit of stories that sell.

Over the past few years, Iraq and Syria have become perhaps the single most popular area for young freelance journalists to launch their careers. In this region, there are sometimes as many journalists as local militia fighters.

 

 

 

Two months ago, Simkin crossed the Turkish border into Kobani, Syria, to cover the battle between the Free Syrian Army (FSA), the Kurdish YPG, and Islamic State (IS). He had recently been expelled from a group supporting freelance journalists in the Middle East for his repeated entry into Syria, but had since established an amicable relationship with a Turkish intelligence official and was granted permission to re-enter the country. 

Following a small unit from the FSA in Kobani, Simkin came under fire from IS militants and took refuge in one of the town’s bombed-out buildings. IS fighters emerged from a smoke plume moments later and shot the lead FSA commander metres from where Simkin was hiding. When the fighting ceased, Simkin emerged from the rubble and helped carry the wounded commander to the Turkish-Syrian border. After receiving medical attention in Turkey, he survived his wounds.

Allan Kaval, a 25-year-old journalist, was one of the many other people reporting on Kobani in those days of fighting between the FSA, the YPG, and IS. His story is typical of this new crop of freelancers covering the region. Originally from Paris, Kaval long studied the Kurdish issue, but only saw an opportunity to report on it professionally after the unrest began in Iraq and Syria. Today, he reports from Erbil, Iraq and sells the majority of his work to La Monde in France. He has reported on some of the year’s biggest stories, including the humanitarian disaster of the Yazidis trapped on Mt. Sinjar and the Kurdish front against IS, where he blends macro-level geopolitics in his coverage with personal stories of those affected on the ground.

My path crossed with Kaval’s one year ago at a government building in Southeastern Turkey just as his journalism career was taking off. I was shooting a documentary film on the dwindling Assyrian Christian community in Turkish Kurdistan and was waiting to interview the province’s Christian governor, Februniye Akyol: Kaval had just learned about the IS takeover of Mosul, and was hoping that a local Kurdish official would know where he could find a hole in the fence to cross into Iraq and cover the story. 

Kaval and I spent a few restless hours together waiting for our respective interviews, and we quickly bonded over the dangers of Middle East reporting. As a student journalist and filmmaker graduating this spring, I held abstract fantasies about travelling to war-torn regions and reporting on the defining conflicts of our day. Still, Turkish Kurdistan, a comparatively safe part of the region, was the furthest I was willing to go in pursuit of a story. Surely, my nervous mother would not be too fond of me spending my evenings in bombed-out sections of Syria and Iraq. 

I ultimately split from Kaval to go talk to Akyol, but found his take on the craft incredibly insightful for aspiring journalists like myself. Kaval rebels against the characterization of the freelancer as an adventurer. Humble and introspective, he sees himself as a vital chronicler of history. 

“People don’t choose war,” Kaval said. “They are only suffering the consequences of a war that has been decided by other people. The most important thing is to record these terrible stories, and through them, try to make sense of this bloodshed.”

Some of the most harrowing stories Kaval has covered have been on the border between Iraq and Iran, where Iranian-backed Shiite militias have ravaged Sunni villages. In one village, all of the residents fled an impending invasion by Shiite militia, but were unable to bring one of the town’s mentally ill citizens along with them. When the militia arrived to find a ghost town, they beheaded the lone handicapped man and kicked his head around as if it were a soccer ball.

“He was a mentally ill person,” Kaval lamented. “He couldn’t hurt anybody. He couldn’t even wash his body or eat for himself. It’s always the same horrible stories, every single day.”  

For Kaval, the hardest part of being a freelancer is not the lack of a steady income or the daily dangers, but the difficulty of balancing a personal life with his professional duties. 

“In the morning, I go meet people who have been kidnapped, abused, raped, and then return to my hotel and talk to my parents about the tiny problems they have at work, with family, or with the coffee machine,” Kaval said. “It’s surreal to, on the same day, inhabit two such different worlds.” 

 

 

 

In a recent piece for The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg argued that journalists in the Middle East can no longer be assured of their safety. 

“Extremists don’t need a middleman anymore,” Goldberg commented, with reference to the Jihadi groups’ use of social media to disseminate their messages. “Journalists have been replaced by YouTube.” In the past, “the transaction worked for both parties,” he explained. But now, journalists serve little purpose for extremists other than to be kidnapped for ransom or killed. 

His cynical assessment is unfortunately proving to be correct. Last year, 61 journalists were killed in the field, among the highest numbers in history. Nearly half of those reporters are freelancers, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. For reporters all over the region, this has been a soul-searching moment. 

“Every journalist has thought to himself: If I take the wrong road, I could get kidnapped by [IS],” Kaval acknowledged. “It’s something that everyone keeps in mind every day when doing their work.” 

Simkin agrees with Kaval that IS controlled areas are a no-go zone for journalists. 

“[Reporting in] their territory is absolutely a death sentence,” Simkin says of the region controlled by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. “I am willing to go anywhere except for there, where the rate of failure is so high.”

Many of Simkin and Kaval’s contemporaries have been far less cautious. Earlier this year, Simkin was in a hotel in Turkey with Japanese journalist Kenji Goto the day before he left for IS-controlled Syria. 

“I was one of the last people to see Kenji before he got captured,” Simkin said. “He never told anyone where he was going.”

On Jan. 30, 2015, Goto was beheaded by IS. 

“If I knew he was going there, I would have convinced him that it was a bad, bad idea,” Simkin explained. “Still, I know it would have been hard to talk him out of it: He felt he had a duty to tell this story to the world.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue