Latest News

Science & Technology

SUS Academia Week (January 23 – January 28)

The Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) kicked off its seventh annual Academia Week on Monday, Jan. 23. The week-long series of talks, presentations, and networking events will showcase new and innovative research, while promoting science career paths beyond the arenas of medicine and academia.

The highlight of the week will likely be the keynote address on Friday by world-renowned neuroscientist Dr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne. Tessier-Lavigne, who is currently president of The Rockefeller University, was once an executive vice-president of biotech giant Genentech. Tessier-Lavigne is a McGill alumnus and Rhodes Scholar, and his current research centres around developmental neuroscience and degenerative neural diseases.

Neil Verma, SUS VP Academic, told the Tribune how the SUS was able to get Tessier-Lavigne as a speaker.

“His extensive ties to McGill as a renowned alumni was the main factor that allowed us to secure him as the keynote despite his busy schedule,” Verma said. “We are extremely excited to have him come and speak not only about his academic career but his progression from a McGill BSc to the current president of [The] Rockefeller University in New York.”

The week will also feature more lighthearted  speaker events, including a talk on the science of sports and human sexuality.

Verma spoke about the society’s choice to host a somewhat unconventional talk by sex therapist Dr. Laurie Betito.

“We have always been looking for fresh ideas to incorporate into our weekly repertoire,” he said. “Dr. Betito’s work seemed to be a novel application of the fields of psychology and sex therapy, which we felt would be very well received by McGill students.”

–Anand Bery

Student Life

How to get experience when you have no experience

As graduation looms, I seem to have had thousands of conversations recently about what to do after university. What I’ve found is that there emerges one snarling, pesky paradox: you must have experience to get experience. This poses an obvious problem for even the most investigative of job-seekers, a problem which pervades career fields both elite and comical. You can imagine my dismay when, after weeks of searching through the listings of carnivals and traveling circuses, I found out that an entry level blindfolded chainsaw juggler position required two years previous similar employment. But all jokes aside, there is one saving grace, and it comes in the form of outdoor summer seasonal employment. 

While it may be winter now, it doesn’t hurt to plan ahead. In the balmy months of summer, seasonal job opportunities abound, since certain outdoor projects and organizations cannot function in persistent inclement weather. I discovered this when I turned my own employment crosshairs away from complete and utter cluelessness and began to aim at jobs in conservation field work. What I discovered were countless cadres of project leaders in search of an able-bodied short-term work force willing to break its back and sun-burn its neck for a few months at a time. In essence, the exclusivity so common in career-driven fields melts away and the impenetrable cycle of experience-begetting-experience is, for lack of a better word, penetrated.

Obviously, you have to know where to look. The following are just some examples of seasonal work which those of us facing life after graduation should consider for a first soiree into the real world. First off, let’s consider Community Supported Agriculture. CSAs have begun to pop up everywhere, and not just in small podunk towns. There are over 90 CSA farms around Montreal, each committed to sustainable agriculture, and most either supply local farmers’ markets or organize a farm-share, in which members receive produce directly from the farmers themselves. Emphasizing these aspects of sustainable agriculture is one thing, but CSA farms also tend to hire heavily in the summer. Although the pay is usually negligible, room and board is often free, and there’s no better way to squeeze into a local community than by bringing fresh food straight from your farm to someone’s fridge (think of it as your exotic European WWOOFing trip (Willing Workers On Organic Farms), just a little closer to home). 

Another option is to be a wilderness guide. Odds are you wouldn’t want to do this in Canada during any other time than the summer anyway, and let’s face it, in ten years we won’t have the energy to trek into Banff with a 30 kg backpack, some Mueslix, and a broken compass.  So take the time now. King Pacific Lodge, Treetop Trekking, and NovaShores Adventures are just three top names which are hiring now, and new openings come out every day.  

You might be saying to yourself that my future me will have nothing to do with outdoor work, so the whole seasonal experience argument is useless. Don’t listen to yourself. For example, leadership retreats abound in the summer, and while most are premised upon outdoor skill-building, the main takeaway is an unchallengeable forte in organizational leadership and people skills. These are transferrable to any job, and for the price of a bottle of sunscreen, you could avoid a mind-numbing management training session in a florescent room at your future cubicle job.

Perhaps you have your dream job laid out in front of you, and this is all nonsense. But for the rest of us, taking the time work outside the proverbial box will, I believe, prove invaluable.  Do yourself a favour and leave McGill ready, as it says in a sea-kayaking guide position which just opened up, to “work in the world’s largest tides.”

Science & Technology

Websites dark for a day in protest of U.S. anti-piracy bills

en.wikipedia.org

Black banners confronted visitors to the English version of Wikipedia, reddit and several other websites this past Wednesday as part of the largest online political demonstration in history. The websites were protesting two proposed bills in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives: the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA).

If passed, SOPA and PIPA would allow Congress or copyright holders to take direct action against websites that are deemed to be infringing on copyright or intellectual property, or dealing in counterfeit goods like forged sports memorabilia. The bills were proposed and supported by both sides of the aisle,  as members of Congress, backed by various entertainment companies, sought a tool for stronger action against copyright infringement, up to and including blocking access to websites.

Opponents of the bill include the Wikimedia Foundation and reddit, as well as other tech giants like Google, Facebook, eBay, and Twitter. Their primary concern is that the bills are too open to interpretation. 

These companies share four main objections to SOPA and PIPA:

 

Their broad wording

SOPA and PIPA propose that websites which are found to be “committing or facilitating the commission of criminal violations” are liable to be punished. Under this condition, any website that has a link to another site that illegally possesses copyrighted content is held equally accountable. For websites that do not directly control what links are posted, such as Google, Facebook, reddit—or any site which accepts user comments or uses robots to crawl other sites—this broad umbrella makes them liable and would “criminalize linking” according to Google CEO Eric Schmidt.

 

DNS blacklisting

Blacklisting would make the unique address of an offending website invisible and unreachable by typing in the URL or searching on Google. This is a departure from current attempts to control copyright infringement where the website must simply remove offending content. Instead, what is proposed would remove any possiblity of accessing the website, essentially shutting it down.

 

Duty to monitor

Currently, for any copyright claim to be made, copyright holders must inform a website that it hosts copyrighted material, and prove that the claimer has ownership. SOPA and PIPA would legislate that websites must monitor themselves for any offending content or links, or otherwise risk being shut down in response to a single complaint. Not only would this force larger companies to divert resources into monitoring their content, but it may act as a barrier to smaller companies.

 

Freedom of speech

There are worries that DNS blacklisting coupled with vague wording on what constitutes an offending website has too much potential for abuse.  Civil libertarians have drawn comparisons to the Great Firewall of China, saying that while the intent is completely different, the effects could be the same.

 

Opponents to SOPA and PIPA are multinational, as the proposed bills would affect foreign websites as well as domestic ones. For example, the American company Verisign owns the registry for the suffix “.com,” so any website that uses “.com” is subject to SOPA and PIPA regardless of the website’s country of origin. If an offending link were posted on any .com site, the site runs the risk of being erased from the Internet before being given the chance to defend the allegations. It’s a shoot first, ask questions later approach.

In the wake of online protests, the strong opposition shown has caused supporters to waver. The number of congressmen and senators against SOPA and PIPA is growing rapidly, with many taking to Twitter to make their opposition publicly known. Republican Senator John Cornyn was quoted as saying, “Stealing content is theft, plain and simple, but concerns about the Internet and free speech necessitate a more thoughtful, deliberative process.” On Friday, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid postponed the upcoming Senate vote on PIPA. SOPA’s sponsor, Representative Lamar Smith, announced that SOPA would also be postponed, pending further review. He added that he was willing to rework the bill to precisely target only infringing websites.

While it seems protestors have thwarted SOPA and PIPA for now, one should expect to see them again in a new form. The MPAA, RIAA, and other proponents of the bills aren’t likely to give up on ensuring their copyrights are protected.

News

McGill Living Library brings books to life

Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to talk to someone busted for dealing pot, a struggling single mom, a concert pianist, or a disabled person who grew up in “the place of the belugas”? A special library event held this week provided students with the time and place to talk to these characters and others, at no cost.

McGill’s Living Library was founded on the idea of the Human Library—a concept started in 2000 at a youth festival in Denmark. The event was sponsored by a variety of campus organizations and volunteer librarians, and was first organized at McGill in 2011.

The premise is simple: each recruited volunteer personalizes a book by preparing a story about themselves.  On the day of the Living Library, students, staff, and the public visit the Living Library at the Redpath Library and look through a catalogue of books.

“It’s called the catalogue, just like a library, and it’s a listing of books that people can check out,” librarian volunteer Sarah Wilkinson said.

After reading the book descriptions and choosing a book, an appointment is made with the “book.” Some books, like The Flaming Teabag or How Catching Fire Brought Me Down to Earth are more popular than others. Appointments are made in 30-minute blocks, but it’s easy to get caught up in the story and go over the allotted time.

While the subject is telling his or her story, the viewer is encouraged to ask questions and find out more. The level of interaction is unique to the Living Library and makes for a more animated level of learning.

One of the main goals is to break down prejudices or misconceptions that each “book” feels bound by.

“If we can say that one of the tasks of a liberal university education is to provide opportunities for learning while instilling a lifelong habit of questioning cherished assumptions, then the benefit of the McGill Living Library project would be to challenge members of the McGill community to examine their beliefs and attitudes toward difference,” reads the McGill Living Library’s website.

During a slow period, June Apostol, a Masters student in library and information studies discussed why she volunteered to participate as a book. Apostol, a volunteer firefighter from Pennsylvania, represented the book The Flaming Teabag.

“I’m hoping to take this back to Philadelphia and pitch it to one of the city libraries or my hometown library. I think it’s very valuable and I think it’s very interesting,” she said.

Apostol also explained why she felt that it’s important that other libraries consider projects similar to McGill’s Living Library.

“Libraries are changing and I think that people who think that libraries are dying have an incorrect assumption about what libraries are,” she said. “Libraries aren’t just books, [or] just books and DVDs, [or] just, you know, fiction libraries and video games. They can be e-books, they can be e-audiobooks, they can be people, they can be a collection of names or individuals that know different skills.”

David Haberman, a U3 student at McGill, stopped by the Living Library to check out the book Please Don’t Shout—I’m Only Blind.

“I think it’s nice that the libraries are looking to expand [their] role because [their] former responsibility as a place to take out books has gone the way of the rotary telephone—it’s not useful anymore,” Haberman said.

Since the rise in popularity of the Internet and the legitimacy of online research, libraries have been forced to evolve their traditional services. McGill has discovered that the Living Library may be a good place to start.

News

Inter-campus shuttles now web-enabled

Sofia Markusfeld / McGill Tribune

 This semester, the 30-minute commute between McGill’s downtown and Macdonald campuses will become just a bit more productive, as the buses now offer wireless Internet service.

McGill announced on Jan. 9 that students and staff with McGill usernames and passwords can use the Wi-Fi free of charge on the buses.  

Gary Bernstein, the Director of Network and Communications Services at McGill University, explained that the initiative began after he traveled from Montreal to Toronto. With Internet connectivity available on the Via Rail train, but not on his return aboard a Megabus coach, he realized how big of a difference Internet connectivity can make while in transit. 

“There are only a number of things you can do on a Blackberry,” Bernstein said. “But, it is easy, in this day and age, to set up a network anywhere.”

He explained that Telus donated a few USB mobile Internet  keys and, knowing it would be free of charge to the university, he began a trial service on one inter-campus shuttle bus. The trial phase began in mid-August even though the connection was weak. At that time, it was recommended that students not use the service for software updates, calls, or important work. Nonetheless, Bernstein said that he received a lot of positive feedback regarding the trial Wi-Fi. On Jan. 9  the service became standard on the buses

 “There are four buses that have Wi-Fi service,” Bernstein told the Tribune via email. “The blue bus (that is sometimes used as a replacement) does not have Wi-Fi. We did not feel that it was justified to spend money on a service that would not be used frequently. We have to pay for the Internet bandwidth on a per-bus per-month basis, whether or not it is used.”

Some students are unsure whether or not the new system will provide a consistent connection. 

“The question is: It is reliable?” Tracy Mcdonough, a Master’s student in nutrition at Macdonald Campus, said. “One … of [the] buses doesn’t yet have Wi-Fi, so you don’t know [if the bus you’re] going to be on [will carry service].” 

Many commuting students say they are enjoying the new service. 

“I have used it once or twice, and it seems to be working properly,” Brianna Kovarik, U0 education, said. “I always see laptops and iPads everywhere.”

When questioned whether the service is going to expand to other areas of campus, Bernstein presented a positive outlook that there will be greater Wi-Fi connectivity around campus and on other McGill-run shuttle buses, such as the shuttle buses travelling between the various hospitals operated by McGill University and its downtown campus. 

News

Mobile Security App will soon hit campus

A new application will allow on-campus smartphone users to call for emergency campus support at the touch of a button. On Jan. 19, Guardly announced the release of a free mobile security application for students, faculty, and staff at 67 universities and colleges across Canada, including McGill University. This is the first time such a service has been made available to Canadian students.

“Our technology brings the capabilities of code blue emergency phones typically found sparsely on campus paths and in buildings onto students’ smartphones, which we believe will reduce response times for those calling for help,” Guardly CEO Josh Sookman explained in an email to the Tribune.

By downloading the Guardly app onto any iPhone, BlackBerry, Android, or Windows Phone 7 device and registering it with your university email address, campus members can access its services.

Guardly’s service was inspired by the difficulties of witnessing slow responses to 911 calls and trying to reach close friends and family during an emergency, Sookman explained.

“Inspiration for this free service for students came from better understanding how calls for help generally occur on university campuses and how archaic the systems are.”

“It was a natural evolution of our technology, to enable a service like this for students,” Sookman said in a press release. “Given the high prevalence of sexual assault against women and increases in violent acts on some campuses, we feel this innovation should be something provided to students for free.”

When in an emergency situation, students simply launch the app, which initiates a one-to-one voice call with the university’s campus security. In addition, the app allows students to notify up to 15 personal contacts via email, text message, and automated voice calling.

“When Guardly is activated, a group of contacts will receive alerts describing the nature of the emergency, the location where Guardly was activated, and the name of the emergency group triggered,” Sookman said.

In the wake of the presence of riot police on the McGill campus on Nov. 10, this new app may hold greater significance to the McGill community. However, this app was in development starting in the fall of 2010, and the timing is simply a coincidence.

Commenting on the events of Nov. 10 however, Sookman noted that “the incident shows the value that a service like Guardly could bring to help people communicate and spread the word of news of campus much faster.”

When asked about potential abuses of the service, Sookman replied, “Like any emergency service (including 911), it is up to people to act in good faith and use the system appropriately. Often, it is worth the risk to have a few false positives than not to have the service in place at all.”

 

– Kyla Mandel

Opinion

The Referenda results were clear

McGill Tribune

The assertion by Professor Mendelson and supported by the McGill Tribune (“Admin was right to refuse the referenda”  Jan. 16, 2012) that the referenda questions run by QPIRG McGill and CKUT 90.3fm were unclear betrays a particularly low estimate of the intelligence of McGill students.

We asked students to support our organizations with a non-opt-outable fee.  Our campaigns had 5,245 students voting, far exceeding quorum for a fall referenda and both QPIRG and CKUT received a clear majority. If students objected to the question, or did not want to support the continuation of our groups with a non-optoutable fee, they could have voted no, they could have voted no opinion or they could have organized a no campaign.  This is what people do in a democracy.

McGill students have repeatedly demonstrated that they understand the value of CKUT and QPIRG, and the threat to our existence that the online opt-out system has created.  To declare this evidence invalid is undemocratic. CKUT’s question was approved by the Chief Returning Officer for Elections McGill and by the SSMU council on Oct. 17, 2011. The wording was debated and students democratically decided that it was a clear and reasonable question to put to referendum.  QPIRG McGill obtained the signatures of over 500 undergraduate students from seven faculties, following the regulations for a student-initiated referendum.

In a letter dated Oct. 26, 2011 five days before the referendum and with disregard for SSMU due process. Professor Mendelson informed us that we had to run an identical question to the 2007 referendum (interestingly, the 2007 question contained provisions concerning both our existence and a change to our funding arrangement, and was accepted by the administration.)  There is no requirement in our Memorandum of Agreement or any other regulation that we are aware of that requires us to run the same question in perpetuity. To repeat: the CKUT and QPIRG questions had both been approved according to the established democratic processes of SSMU, processes for which the Deputy Provost apparently has no respect whatsoever.

Students supported these referenda questions because they understood the problems of the online opt-out system.  The financial burden caused by this system undermines our ability to carry out the service students voted to retain.  Every semester, our organizations are forced to devote considerable resources to defend ourselves against unregulated and inflammatory campaigning during the opt-out period. Beyond these financial implications, the issue of opt-outs concerns the democratic question of whether mere convenience should be allowed to undermine a service that a clear majority of students have repeatedly said they value. There was no history of students being refused a refund, or being treated in a discourteous fashion if they requested a refund or any incident of harassment or intimidation prior to the imposition of the online opt out.  Since the implementation of the Minerva opt out system, each semester there is unregulated, poisonous campaigning that affects all student groups and every student who participates in and supports these groups.  Is that the price we should have to pay for convenience?

McGill students have voted. When will the Administration listen?

Opinion

QI: a bold initiative, but not without costs

McGill Tribune

At last week’s senate meeting, the university announced plans to team up with the École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), the Federal government, and the City of Montreal, with the aim of creating the Quartier de l’innovation (QI), a proposed entrepreneurial hub designed to “optimise university-industry synergies.”

The project has several positive aspects. It will provide a platform for McGill’s research to be applied in the business world, with links being made with companies like Bombardier, Pfizer, and IBM for investments into research and development. It has the potential to give McGill’s aspiring entrepreneurs the opportunity to gain access to advice, investment, and collaboration. Opportunities also abound for entrepreneurs in the Montreal area to start up their companies or at least share their ideas and innovations. The Tribune is also excited by the project’s stated intent to generate internship placements for McGill students at many of the companies hoping to set up shop at the QI.

However, the Tribune has concerns with the some of the more widespread effects of the QI. Firstly, the neighbourhoods of Griffintown and Faubourg des Récollets, the proposed location of the QI, is a prime area of affordable housing for low income families. The flow of businesses to the QI will inevitably lead to rises in property prices and rental costs. The result could be a higher cost of living for those less able to pay for it. Though property owners and landlords will almost certainly benefit, the result could be the loss of a rare pocket of affordable housing in the downtown area. 

Secondly, at a time when the university’s resources are already stretched, the Tribune questions whether it’s prudent to be investing in such a large scale expansion. One of the administration’s defences in the face of the MUNACA strike was to point to their lack of finances. The expansion into Griffintown means that either the administration feels entirely assured that the move is guaranteed to reap dividends, or they were simply being liberal with the truth about the state of their balance books. The expansion is a gamble.  University finances will take another turn for the worse if the Quartier de L’Innovation fails to ignite as much as is envisioned. There is no guarantee that businesses will flock to the QI by default—there are already similar institutions in cities like Toronto, Vancouver, and Oxford with more competitive tax rates, equally comprehensive research departments, and less strict language laws. 

The university should also be cautious about flirting too much with private businesses. Jumping into bed with corporations could lead to private interests exerting undue leverage upon public research, potentially leading the university away from its educational mission and more towards one of private enterprise and economic gain.

If these considerations are taken into account with a degree of prudence, the university’s expansion will hopefully help to solve its funding issues, regenerate parts of Montreal’s downtown, encourage entrepreneurs, boost the Quebec economy, and stimulate innovation. But that is an if, and not necessarily a when. There is a long way to go before Griffintown can genuinely be called a “live-work urban hub with international reach.”

News

Education Week a response to fall issues on campus

From Jan. 12 to 20, SSMU hosted (Reclaim Your) Education Week, a seven-day series of workshops, discussions, and presentations that sought to raise awareness about a number of issues on the McGill campus, including tuition hikes and the struggles of marginalized groups on campus. 

Education Week was made possible by collaboration between SSMU, the Quebec Public Interest Research Group at McGill (QPIRG), the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS), and the November 10th Community Alliance. 

Education Week was a completely student-based initiative, inspired by questions that arose in the context of recent events, such as the MUNACA strike, Nov. 10, and Dean Jutras’ report on the events of Nov. 10. 

“Students hear a lot of things, have many questions, but get little answers,” PGSS VP External Mariève Isabel said. “They wanted to share their concerns and their hopes for the future of McGill … while reclaiming that they also should be part of the decision-making process.”

“Education Week was also inspired by a similar week of events at University of California Davis,” SSMU VP External Joël Pedneault said. “We thought it would be a very useful type of thing to organize at McGill.”

According to Pedneault, the primary goals of Education Week were to spread awareness, and to “re-energize mobilization.”

Workshops covered a large variety of issues relevant to McGill students, ranging from racism and street tactics to social equity and neo-liberalism. 

Among the many workshops offered, one in particular offered a chance to discuss colonialism, decolonization, and solidarity concerning indigenous communities and their struggles.  

Facilitators Cleve Higgins and Dan Lazarus, both former McGill students, led a discussion on the ongoing legacy of colonialism and the many conflicts with the Canadian government in which indigenous communities find themselves. 

Many indigenous populations in Quebec and throughout Canada continue to be disenfranchised for the purpose of resource extraction, an issue especially prevalent today with regard to the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline in British Columbia. 

The thorny issue of tuition hikes received considerable spotlight throughout Education Week. The week served as preparation for the “ongoing and upcoming fight again tuition hikes,” according to the event’s website.  

The proposed tuition hikes, which consist of a $325 increase per year, over a period of five years, will affect all students.  

“All students pay a basic amount of tuition, which is what is charged to Quebec residents,” Pedneault said. “Since this base amount is being raised, everyone will be affected by tuition hikes.”

While many student groups face a number of challenges in the context of tuition hikes, increased tuition for graduate students poses extra financial stress, which helps explain PGSS’s active participation in spreading awareness.  

“Graduate students often have more responsibilities and more expenses [than undergraduate students],” Isabel said. “A huge proportion of students do not complete their degree.”

Isabel suggested that this may be the result of financial obstacles. 

The workshops that addressed tuition hikes aimed to educate students about the facts and consequences of the proposed increases, as well as the logistics of student strikes, a topic that has recently been addressed more intently. 

SSMU Arts Councillor and U2 economics and women’s studies student Jamie Burnett facilitated  a workshop called “Demystifying Student Strikes—History and Practice.”

“Student strikes are a tactic—[they] come out of people deciding that they’re concerned about something,” Burnett said. “If you look at the major student strikes in Quebec, they’re mainly about student fees and financial aid.”

The workshop also addressed the different forms of strikes as well as the effectiveness of each.  

“There exist one-day strikes, which can be pretty effective … in getting the message across,” Burnett explained. “But looking at major victories in the history of student strikes in Quebec, the more successful ones are the general unlimited strikes.”

However, a lot of thought, planning, and effort are necessary for the successful implementation of a student strike. 

“It does take work to look at the policy, look at the budget and have students understand that a strike is worth it,” Burnett said. “Strikes need to involve the active participation of a lot of students. It is not enough to say you’re on strike.”

Another large-scale demonstration against tuition hikes in Montreal is planned for March 22.  

Despite having been organized in only a matter of weeks, Education Week attracted considerable attention.  

“I don’t think that the McGill community has seen such a level of activism on campus since the 1990s,” Isabel said. “It was quite impressive to see the students … building on each other’s knowledge [about these issues].” 

“With a bit of luck, this event series might become an annual fixture of the SSMU calendar, similar to Culture Shock or Social Justice Days,” Pedneault said.

News

High-flying McGill student meets with Pakistan PM

Courtesy of Zohaib Asad

In 2011, Pakistani student Zohaib Asad earned a record-breaking 28 ‘A’s in the University of Cambridge International O-Level Examinations, a high school examination program run by the University of Cambridge that’s  taken in over 80 countries.   

This month, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani invited Asad, who is now in his first year at McGill, to the Prime Minister House in order to congratulate him on his achievements. 

“It was a great honour for me and my parents to be personally invited by the Prime Minister,” Asad said. 

Asad is presently pursuing an undergraduate degree in economics and international development. He chose to come to McGill because of its excellent reputation in Pakistan and because he has friends who attended McGill in the past. 

“The best thing about McGill are the students,” Asad said, when describing his new school. “[They are] friendly, helping, [and] mature which is what matters the most when you are away from home.”

Before coming to McGill, Asad attended a Beaconhouse international school in Pakistan, where he balanced his academics with his duties as head boy and member of his school’s football team. Beaconhouse is a global network of private schools with a large presence in Asia. 

“Studying for O-levels is hard, scoring well is even harder since each subject demands you to think in a specific way rather than repeat learned material,” Asad explained. “Studying for so many [exams requires] time management skills.”

In addition, Asad noted that studying in a competitive and rigorous school environment helped him stay motivated and focused. 

“When I set a target, I don’t care what comes in the way: all I see is my target,” he said.  

Asad recognizes, however, that his previous academic achievements don’t mean that he won’t face new challenges at McGill. 

“I believe the future is independent of the past. Even in O-levels, each subject required different skills,” he said. “The same goes at university; the big difference [from Beaconhouse] is that we have to be more independent here.”

The McGill community has warmly welcomed Asad to Montreal and celebrated his dedication to academic excellence.  

“I’m delighted for Zohaib, congratulate him on his accomplishment, and wish him well in his academic endeavours here at McGill,” Morton Mendelson, McGill Deputy Provost of Student Life and Learning, said. 

McGill’s Pakistani Student Association (PSA) is also proud of Asad’s success on the internationally recognized O-levels.

“[Asad’s] achievements are the perfect example of the kind of talent that Pakistan has,” Mohammad Y. Alvi and Syed K. Raza, Co-Presidents of the PSA, said. 

After completing his degree, Asad wants to return to work in Pakistan in order to give back to his home country.  

“It is your contribution that counts in society, so never work selfishly in life,” Asad said. 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue