Latest News

Editorial, Opinion

EDITORIAL: The CRTC shouldn’t tangle with the Web

Back in 1999, in a rare and uncharacteristic display of good sense, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission announced: “Our message is clear. We are not regulating any portion of the Internet.”

Unfortunately, all good things must come to an end. The CRTC recently announced that it will hold hearings to investigate the possible regulation of “new media” in Canada. The announcement comes as the CRTC is deliberating whether or not Internet service providers have the right to throttle bandwidth based on the content clients are accessing. These are both troubling developments.

Regulating Canadian broadcast media is part of the CRTC’s mandate. According to the agency, the ubiquity of streaming video prompted their intrusion into online affairs. But the Internet is neither Canadian, nor a broadcaster. It’s an international network, and the “old media” rules don’t apply to online content. There are no broadcast licenses to issue and no channels or signals to prioritize.

Because the Internet is demand-driven, there’s no need for online content regulation by the CRTC. Canadians can access (or create) whatever content they want on the Web. There’s no real danger of corrupt broadcast monopolies or American content pushing out home-grown culture.

Of course, listening to the CRTC talk about regulating the Internet is like watching Don Quixote joust with windmills: neither of them has the slightest idea what they’re up against. Trying to impose CRTC policy-be it Canadian content quotas or decency regulations-on an open network is thoroughly impractical. Because the CRTC’s jurisdiction only extends over Canadian-operated websites, the negative impacts of regulation will be limited to Canadian content-a cruel irony for an agency whose goal is to “ensure that all Canadians have access to a wide variety of high quality Canadian programming.”

While the CRTC’s proposal to regulate online content is Quixotic, their deliberations on network neutrality are troubling. They’re currently hearing a complaint filed by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers against Bell Canada, after CAIP complained that Bell is throttling the speed of certain types of online traffic, like peer-to-peer file sharing.

Throttling is a troubling practice for net neutrality advocates. Google, one of the more prominent advocates of network neutrality, states their case in simple terms: “Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet. … Just as telephone companies are not permitted to tell consumers who they can call or what they can say, broadband carriers should not be allowed to use their market power to control activity online.”

The Tribune couldn’t agree more. Giving Internet service providers the ability to prioritize or block traffic makes them the judge of what Canadians should see. Government censorship-like the CRTC’s-is bad enough. But private sector censorship is a terrifying prospect. Whatever its flaws, the Internet’s accessibility has been a virtue. The CRTC should leave it that way.

Student Life

Campus Calendar

Screening of Point BlankWhen: Oct. 28 7-9 p.m.Where: Arts W-125DESA presents a film screening of the 1967 noir classic Point Blank. Cultural Studies professor Alanna Thain will be presiding over the screening and will lead an informal discussion after the movie. There will be free popcorn!

National Novel Writing MonthWhen: Nov. 1, 12:00 a.m. to Nov. 30, 11:59 p.m.Where: EverywhereNational Novel Writing Month is a writing contest in which participants write 50,000 words (175 pages) by the end of November. Valuing quantity over quality, NaNoWriMo is a novel-writing extravaganza for everyone who has thought fleetingly about writing a novel but has been scared by the time/effort involved. Visit www.nanowrimo.org for more info or to sign up.

Election Coverage When: Nov. 4, 8 p.m.Where: Gert’s (Shatner basement)The Political Issues Club wants you to join in on our American election night extravaganza! We’re meeting to catch the results of the election live, along with other political clubs and students. Questions? Contact [email protected].

Advertise your event for free by sending the name, date, location, and other info to [email protected] with “event” in the subject line.

Sports

Central

* Detroit Pistons: The team that won it all in 2004 has kept their starting line-up virtually intact since, losing only C Ben Wallace in 2006. But after six straight trips to the Eastern Conference Finals, changes are afoot-new Head Coach Michael Curry replaces the polarizing Flip Saunders. With continued development from young players, specifically F Amir Johnson and PG Rodney Stuckey, this team has an exciting blend of youth and experience.

* Cleveland Cavaliers: How can a team led by SF Lebron James be terrible offensively? Head Coach Mike Brown might finally have the tools to rectify that deficiency, in PG Mo Williams and rookie PF J.J. Hickson. Williams’s ability to spread the ball around will open up the floor for James, who seems primed for an astounding statistical season.

* Chicago Bulls: Unproven rookie Head Coach Vinny Del Negro finds himself in a less-than-ideal situation in Chicago. The Bulls are chock full of talent, but are fundamentally unbalanced. Since SG Ben Gordon signed a one-year qualifying offer in the offseason, he could be dangled as trade bait. The Bulls need to move him for a low-post scorer. The key to the team’s success will be the first overall pick in the draft, PG Derrick Rose.

Indiana Pacers: The Pacers addressed last year’s shortcomings-cap space and the point guard spot-by trading C Jermaine O’Neal for PG T.J. Ford and C Rasho Nesterovic, both of whom will be able to jump into the starting line-up immediately. The Pacers are also hoping that 7’2″ rookie C Roy Hibbert will fill the void left by O’Neal’s departure.

Milwaukee Bucks: The Bucks’ offseason was full of much-deserved turnover. Milwaukee brought in disciplinarian Scott Skiles as head coach, as well as SF Richard Jefferson, PG Luke Ridnour, and SF Joe Alexander. Out went former head coach Larry Krystkowiak, PG Mo Williams, SF Desmond Mason, and SF Bobby Simmons. For this team to succeed, Jefferson and sharpshooting SG Michael Redd will have to light up the scoreboard, and C Andrew Bogut will need to continue improving.

Sports

Atlantic

Boston Celtics: The reigning champs lost a lot of their toughness when they let go of SF James Posey, but the Celtics are still the favourites to win the East. Their rookies, C Semih Erden and guards Bill Walker and J.R. Giddens, have seen little action this preseason and figure to play minor roles, if any, this year. PF Kevin Garnett won’t allow the champs to be content with just one title-this team will be strong once again.

Philadelphia 76ers: The acquisition of PF Elton Brand immediately makes the Sixers a contender in the East. The duo of Brand and C Samuel Dalembert is going to be a matchup nightmare for opposing offences. SF Andre Iguodala has done well since Allen Iverson’s departure, and is on the verge of becoming an elite player. The Sixers hope that their abundant talent will make up for their roster’s youth.

Toronto Raptors: Trading away T.J. Ford opens up the floor for the efficient PG Jose Calderon, who clearly established himself as a threat last season. PF Andrea Bargnani and SF Jason Kapono give Toronto size on the perimeter, allowing them to create more room inside. The addition of C Jermaine O’Neal gives Toronto the best frontcourt in the East with PF Chris Bosh. Those two must develop some chemistry if the Raptors are to advance to the second round of the playoffs.

New Jersey Nets: Don’t expect big results from the Nets, who are in the midst of rebuilding. SF Vince Carter, whose career is on the decline, is the centrepiece of this team. However, the Nets have added some upside in C Yi Jianlian, and rookie C Brook Lopez has performed well in the preseason. Lightning-fast Devin Harris will man the point and could make the all-star roster this season.

New York Knicks: With the arrival of Head Coach Mike D’Antoni and his run ‘n’ gun system, the Knicks should be as entertaining on the court this season as they were off the court last season. But New York is still loaded with bad players and ridiculous contracts. Unless they get rid of C Eddy Curry and PG Stephon Marbury, expect another sub-25 win season, despite bright spots like PFs David Lee and Wilson Chandler.

Student Life

Tribune Dating Xtravaganza

With all the lonely hearts grumbling about the impending onslaught of sickly sweet Valentine’s schmaltz, ponder this: is romance dead? Before the Valentine’s Grinch that dwells in the recesses of your soul comes out and grabs the nearest bottle of liquor, rest assured that you’re not alone; the dating situation at McGill is more dire than delicious for many.

It seems that the average student does not date in the formal, pick-me-up-at-the-door kind of way. In fact, many students find that dating altogether is a rare occurrence often blamed on members of the opposite sex.

“The only real dates that I have are with people that I’m already seeing. I’m such a goof that I don’t think people are approaching me for real. I assume it’s pretend even though they might really like me, and I’m such flirt that I’ll flirt and think it doesn’t really mean anything,” says Sarah Schroeter, U2 political science and english literature. “I find guys at McGill are either too forward or too scared. If I’m smiling at you and making eye contact, that means I want you to ask me out.”

Laura Hamilton, a U1 education student agrees with the decline of the dating situation.

“I’ve dated one person before, but not here at McGill. I don’t know why, but I’ve noticed in Montreal a severe lack [of dating]. There is less formal dating, and more informal dating where you go out with a large group,” Hamilton comments.

If all of you are so fabulous…

Commonsense would dictate that raging hormones and cold weather is a recipe for romance even under the most crippling courseload. It would seem that the math of it would be simple: one single person plus another single person equals one couple. Yet, the prevalent singledom at McGill is mind-boggling and inquiring minds want to know why.

“Most of the time, I’m very busy. I don’t get to go out that much, just once in a while. I will generally approach [a] person if the person looks attractive or friendly,” says Robert Ratemo U2 engineering. “Most of the time, I approach people to make friends. I make a lot of friends and if it works out, then OK, but if not, you can just be friends.

“You’ll find that a lot of the girls have boyfriends, but outside of McGill. Most of my friends don’t really date. For me, it’s because I’m older. You can’t really go through mind games, but that’s just me,” says Ratemo.

For some, the circumstances are much more straightforward.

“I don’t have much time [for dating]. I just get to the naughty good shit,” grins Dave Castagner, U2 music.

Of course, personal quirks and tastes cannot be underestimated for the dampening of the proverbial mojo. For Chris G, MBA student, dating seems to be in a deep freeze.

“I date about twice a year. I never approach people. Every time I do it, it never works. I never send signals, I don’t dance very well. The atmosphere [for dating] is too cold,” he says.

All is not lost

Before declaring dating at McGill DOA, a blessed handful of students reaffirmed our faith in the existence of dating and love. There are people out there who date and have active love lives—they just may not be you.

“I think there’s a lot of dating which isn’t necessarily the football player dating the cheerleader. At university, there’s more freedom in relationships,” says Sean O’Connor, U1 arts.

For one student, dating is more than just a pastime- it is a philosophy. Despite her now-steady boyfriend, she seems to have cornered the dating market and shares some of her sage advice.

“I used to date every other weekend. People would set me up with different people or it would be people that I would meet,” remarks Shannon Cohen, U1 anthropology and history.

“Signals? Sometimes, mutual eye contact. I’ve had the ‘Don’t I know you from somewhere’ and it just snowballs from there.

“I think people tend to get into long term relationships. Just because they’ve dated someone once, it doesn’t necessarily mean that you should be chained to them for life. People should just see each other and date other people before having a relationship. There should be the freedom to say, ‘I’ve gotten to know this person, we’ve gone on a few dates, and I really don’t want to go on anymore’,” advises Cohen.

The international perspective

The McGill International Students’ Network highlights the cultural differences between the amorous playing field of our fair winter hinterland compared with the spicier climes of France, Australia and Brazil.

“I’ll date once in a while, not more than four times a year. I usually take time to get to know the person before I date because God knows what can happen,” comments U2 english student Roberto Rocha of her Latin American home.

“Compared to Brazil, people here are more mature. In Brazil, you can date a girl one night and the next day pretend that you’ve never met her.”

Despite the North American perception of the sensual French, it seems that the average Parisian is much more hands off than Canadians.

“[I date] not too often. I never found the right person, I’m really picky. Canadian guys want more faster. In France, you talk and talk but here they want to kiss you right away,” says Melanie Albiger, grad student at the Genie Industriel Polytechnique.

Australian exchange student Bill Skinner, U2 anthropology, points out that despite cultural differences, we might all be on the same page about what makes a date great.

“Dating, for me, is going out with someone that you like and doing something special like dinner or a movie or something out of the ordinary. Usually, I get approached or it’s a mutual thing and we’ll be thinking the same thing.” opines Skinner.

The last hurrah

The final verdict on dating remains murky, but for some, the key is to take the initiative from your friendly neighborhood cheerleaders and be aggressive.

“We have to go to an auction to get guys! There aren’t enough guys at McGill, the number of men are very few. The boys aren’t really forward enough,” complains Huda Shashaa, a U2 arts student.

This Valentine’s, don’t stay at home twiddling your thumbs. Get on the phone, get on the dance floor, get out your pen and get some numbers. The revival of McGill dating won’t happen on its own.

“I think there’s a lot of casual dating [generally in Montreal] much more than there are actual relationships. [But] university is not conducive to dating,” explains student Maggie Schwalbach, U1 political science. “Usually, the guys that I date are not from McGill. It’s more of a shock than anything if they are from McGill.”


Do you sometimes wonder if you’re the only one despairing over the dating situation at McGill? Well, we did, and we asked 162 McGill students to fill out our ‘Trib date 2001’ survey. Here are some of the most interesting results.


Of those surveyed:

• 58% were single

• 50% of those in a relationship have been in said relationship for over a year

• 31% of those single have been single for over a year while 22% have been single for less than a month.

• 78% have been on an “official date” at least once.

• Men are definitely braver than women: 66% of men said they usually approach the other party, while only 11% of women did the same.

• Still, 65% of those single said they did not “acti
vely date”. Why not? A staggering 60% answered that it just didn’t happen because “nobody asks, I don’t ask”. The “I’m too busy” excuse went out the window, with only 7% answering they didn’t have time to date.

• The “I don’t ask” mentality was confirmed by the 71% who said they would not approach an attractive person in a café. When asked why not, 37% gave “shyness” as the main reason, and only 7% answered that they didn’t want to judge a person by their looks.

• Of the 29% who answered that they would approach an attractive stranger, “curiosity” was the #1 explanation, followed by “why not?”

• Even though an overwhelming majority would not approach a stranger, only 10% said they would not be likely to go out with a fellow student who randomly asked them out, while most contended it depended on the situation.

• Just because we won’t ask anyone out point-blank doesn’t mean we don’t try to indicate our interest more subtly: 85% said that they sent out signals, eye contact being the most popular one. The other 15% don’t send out signals mostly because they’re “too shy”, or they “don’t know how”.

• The signals must not work that well, because only 22% answered that most of their relationships started after being picked up at a party or social event, compared to 75% who said that they were already friends or acquaintances.

• 50% of men thought it was easier for women to pick up, while 55% of women thought it was easier for men.

• 0% answered that most of their relationships started off as blind dates. Blind dates are a strange phenomenon: 60% of those who have never been set up on one said they would be willing to go, but only 28% of those who have been set up on one actually followed through and went.

• 45% of respondents wouldn’t date more than one person at a time (take that, Sex and the City!)

• Finally, the eternal question: how long should you wait before calling? While 45% answered “2 days”, some didn’t hesitate to show their exasperation with comments like “I hate this game bullshit!”

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

McGill Drama Festival produces a lively selection of student plays

Presenting student productions for over 10 years, McGill Drama Festival continues the tradition with seven new plays this year. Set in Players’ Theatre, the Festival’s second week of plays runs from March 23 to the 27th. Each night offers a different collection of two to three short plays written, directed, and produced by McGill students – a perfect sample platter of McGill’s theatrical offerings. No two plays are alike, with topics ranging from marital troubles to a girl’s subconscious to mythological student societies. Below are some of the year’s festival participants.

Accompanied by Prolonged Feelings of DreadWritten by Todd Frei. Directed by Johanu Botha.Embracing all that is wacky, Accompanied by Prolonged Feelings of Dread assaults the audience with a whirlwind of crazy, leaving in its wake a dumbfounded feeling of “what?!” But this seems to be the point. The play’s slapstick portrayal of hypochondria – emerging both as hilarious and claustrophobic – causes us to spend half the time laughing and half wondering what’s going on.

The act takes place in the waiting room of Dr. Bill Norwell (Matt Stevens) which is ruled over by Miss Charon (Renee Hodgins), a stern and sinister secretary. Within the first few minutes it becomes apparent that something strange is in the works: the patients have been waiting for days, weeks, and, in some cases, months – but as time slugs by they never see anybody enter or exit Dr. Norwell’s office. Everything quickly dissolves into meaningless fury and we are forced to ask who, exactly, is ill?

All the actors are interesting to watch, but Hodgins plays her Miss Charon with an impressive integrity – aggressive note taking, hysterical pauses in phone calls, and methodical paper ripping contribute to her calm-before-the-storm/evil headmistress vibe. Shireen Shoofi and Brendan Steven play amusing patients in the waiting room – thanks to her timing and his energy, their enjoyable dynamic often steals the spotlight.

A possible point of frustration for some is Miss Persimmon. The character was a little offensive in her references to the physicality and speech caused by certain real and not-so-funny disabilities. The play lagged towards the end when the plot seemed to have exhausted itself, but the energy and persistence of the actors eventually regained the audience’s attention.

– Grace Glowicki

Truth be ToldWritten by Natalie Gershtein. Directed by Tabia Lau.

Truth be Told tells the familiar tale of an unhappy couple, in which a wife struggles to reconnect with her distant and adulterous husband. Though the story is not very inventive, the play’s honesty, rawness, and unexpected plot twist make it utterly captivating.

The plot follows Jimmy (Matthew Rian Steen), who has developed a tireless habit of sleeping with the secretaries at his law firm. He hires them, seduces them, and finally sends them away with a fat pay check to keep everything quiet. His wife Janine (Chloe Texier) desperately tries to save their drowning marriage, but despite her exhaustive efforts, every day seems to end with a cold and sad “goodnight.”

The set is effective and minimal, not taking attention away from the talented actors. The couple’s bed is positioned at centre stage, serving as a nice visual and thematic centrepiece – the place where many romances call home to the highest and lowest points of love.

Matthew Rian Steen perfectly conveys the arrogance needed from a slime-ball of Jimmy’s calibre – he is so convincing that we hate him up until curtain call. Chloe Texier’s performance was also admirable, though more subtle and understated than Steen’s; she effectively portrays the uncomfortable and pathetic position of a woman trying to pull together a hopeless marriage. In one scene, the couple has an explosive fight which sends energetic chills into the audience – it would have been great to see more arguments between the two, as they did it so well.

Truth be Told was a pleasure to watch – it is at times funny and at others sad. This is a MDF must see.

– Grace Glowicki

DentWritten by Daniel St. Germaine. Directed by Max Zidel.

Dent follows 18-year-old Davy White (Fabien Maltais-Bayda) as he recalls the untimely disappearance of Mrs. DiGiovanni, a woman in his hometown, a few years earlier. The play’s flashbacks reveal how the community was scandalized in response to newspaper headlines and neighbours’ gossip. Through the recollection of carefully selected memories from an impressionable time of his life, Davy pieces together a detailed look into the tragic disappearance of Mrs. DiGiovanni. The performers were wonderful, as both actors complemented each other in their dynamic relationship between mother and son. Giddings does a superb job playing up Davy’s gossip-hungry mother, in a hysterical rendition of a figure we’ve all encountered staring back at us from across the kitchen table. The set and lighting were carefully incorporated to add a bit more depth to this performance; with an eerily placed dentist chair, it didn’t take much to rekindle my childhood fears of unwelcome and rather intrusive prying and poking. The theme of the play may have skewed my perception towards one of discomfort, but I suppose a small town, big news and endless prattle have a tendency to overdo things. “Oh how rumours can be so vindicated!”

– Bianca Van Bavel

Crickets By the StreamWritten by Nathalie Selles. Directed by Isaac Robinson,

Crickets By The Stream begins when three separate parts of one girl’s subconscious join together in random thought. In her mind, there are scary things to be had, and too many snippets of lost wonder, joy, and pointless contemplation. I understand that shorter plays and narratives have difficulty maintaining plots in the same way lengthier pieces do, but this particular play didn’t even try to pull one off. There was no attempt to create coherence – it was destined to be a play with a mind of its own. The writing seemed at odds with all sorts of sensations, but as dissatisfying as the lack of plot was, the way it flowed was impeccable. Certainly, this feeling of continuity in a play full of interrupted ideas was in part due to the strength of the individual performances. If there was such a thing as the embodiment of one’s subconscious, all three actors nailed their role to a tee. Each portrayed a slightly different character angle that they accentuated by their delicate movements. Hannah Tharp’s choreographic work flitted across the stage as poetically as each spoken phrase and the overall mindset was one of bliss and magical entrancement. So empty your brain and let your thoughts wander freely – you’ll take more from this performance if you simply let your mind go.

– Bianca Van Bavel

Apollo TyrannusWritten by Julian Silverman, Directed by Isaac Robinson.

Apollo Tyrannus is a light-hearted comedy with lots of laughs. As president of The Student Society of Mythical Oracles, Apollo (Alex Gravenstein) is faced with solving the crisis concerning Oedipus and with the likelihood of self-fulfilling his own prophecy. Determined to show that the “gods” of governing student societies do not control the students’ fate, the play digresses through a series of comical conversations between three members of the society from rather different backgrounds. The witty mix of classic mythology and modern flavour had the audience captivated from the beginning. The charismatic crew of actors really work their magic in a wonderful complementation of each other’s intensity. Deverett has you on edge as he flies around the room in his agitated portrayal of Hermes, while Clohan balances the scene with Dionysus’ carefree party ways. The group’s cu
nning dynamics were irrefutable as each cast member charmed the audience into hysterics. I could have sworn I heard people in the audience join in at one point as the actors digressed into singing, “I got my swim trunks and my flippie-floppies.”

– Bianca Van Bavel

The schedule for the McGill Drama Festival can be found at ssmu.mcgill.ca/players. Tickets are $5 for students and $12 for a festival pass.

Science & Technology

Something in the Air

In this age of greenhouse gasses and smog advisories, air pollution has gotten a pretty bad name, and rightly so. But it still looks pretty trippy.

Air pollution is divided into four categories: criteria air contaminates (which create smog and acid rain), persistent organic pollutants (which travel well and bioaccumulate in body tissues), heavy metals (which enter the food and water supply) and toxins (which will, in one way or another, kill you). These substances are produced by a variety of sources. Transportation, fossil fuels, industrial processes, agriculture and transboundary air movements (which, rather than determining the trajectories of extremely agile kangaroos, deal with pollutants that are widely carried from one area to another) are among an ever-growing list of culprits. Air pollution is also partially derived from natural sources-phenomena such as volcanoes, dust storms, forest fires and sea spray all contribute to particles in the air.

The upshot of all this is that we get spectacular sunsets.

Chemicals change the refraction of light, particularly at sunset, and so all those pollutants result in brilliantly coloured skies. As the sun sets, light scatters. According to George Dissanaike in the 1991 New Scientist article entitled “Painting the Sky Red,” “Larger particles scatter more of the light, and the effect depends on wavelength. The scattering is stronger in the green-yellow parts of the spectrum as well as in the blue.” In urban areas where pollution consists of larger particles in the air, pollutants filter these shades, such that the sunlight that did manage to reach through the pollution appears a deeper shade of red.

And after the sun sets? Look at the sky above nearly any major city and you’ll see an uncanny glow above-the reflections of millions of lights, often referred to as skyglow, a condition that obscures stars in the night sky.

In North America, skyglow is so severe that steps have been taken towards creating what are known as ‘dark sky reserves,’ where energy-efficient, low-sodium lighting is used to both reduce skyglow and facilitate astronomical observations. In Mont-Mégantic National Park, which contains one of Canada’s foremost astronomical observatories, night-sky visibility was so threatened that it has become a dark sky reserve-one of four in Canada, and the only one to exist in a suburban area. This is partially due to the efforts of ASTROLab, a group dedicated to preserving the area and fighting light pollution. Last May, Natural Resources Canada donated $250,000 to help in their efforts. “The goals of the ASTROLab campaign dovetail perfectly with… our intention to develop national standards for lighting efficiency,” says Parliamentary Secretary Jacques Gourde. However, measures will need to be much more wide-spread to prevent fading any view of the stars for good.

Steps may never be taken toward clearer skies and visible stars, but at least toxic chemicals and light refraction will serve all your surrealist needs.

Behind the Bench, Sports

THIRD MAN IN: Lovin’ the Cubs

In years past, Chicago has been called the most segregated city in America, in reference to the city’s heavily black South Side and the mostly white neighbourhoods of the North Side. The city’s most persistent divide, however, has little to do with race. To a much greater extent than either New York or Los Angeles, Chicago is a city divided by baseball.

The divide is a regional one. South Siders cheer fanatically for the White Sox, while I’m convinced that many North Side guys would rather see a girl in Cubbie blue than in lingerie. And living within walking distance of Wrigley Field, where the Cubs play, is the ultimate goal of many a North Side yuppie.

In the northern suburbs of Chicago, where I grew up, most kids become Cubs fans because their fathers (and often their mothers) take them down to Wrigley on summer Saturdays for day games. As with many sports, allegiance to a team seems to be passed on genetically.

I became a Cubs fan a bit differently.

It’s pretty safe to say that my parents have never been huge baseball fans. Growing up in St. Louis, both of them used to give away or sell the free Cardinals tickets they received from their schools for good grades. And even though it’s been decades since they moved to the Chicago suburbs, whatever latent baseball sympathies they do harbour have remained in St. Louis.

With such unenthusiastic parents, I never really got into baseball as a kid. RBI’s were a mysterious acronym to me, and if I’d overheard someone mention Babe Ruth’s “called shot,” I probably would have guessed the person was talking about hockey or basketball. Though I eventually pieced together the rules of the game, I was never much of fan.

In 2003, however, two things happened. That summer, my uncle took my sister and I to our first game – against the Cardinals, of course – in the “friendly confines” of Wrigley Field. The Cubs won that day, and they kept on winning. As September drew to a close, it became clear that the Cubs were poised for a strong postseason run.

Making the playoffs is exciting for fans of any team, but for no one is it more thrilling than a die-hard North Side Cubs fan. Every week at the top of the division fuels the hope that this year will be the year; that the Cubs will storm through the postseason to the World Series and rid themselves of the so-called Billy Goat curse – the Cubs’ lesser-known and more ridiculous version of the Red Sox’s Curse of the Bambino.

In 2003, however, the Cubbies made it closer than ever before. Brandishing the powerful pitching line-up of Mark Prior and Kerry Wood, the Cubs defeated the Braves in five games before facing the Marlins in the National League Championship Series. I watched every game, transfixed – along with the rest of the North Side – by the possibility of a trip to the World Series.

True to form, the Cubs managed to lose that year in heartbreaking fashion. After winning three games in a row against Florida, the Cubs collapsed in Game Five and never recovered. Though they were just a few outs away from the World Series, the Cubs lost to the Marlins in seven games.

I don’t think I cried when the Cubs lost Game Seven, but I came pretty close. It was in that moment, however, that I became a Cubs fan. No other team has the same capacity for raising the hopes of its fan base time and again, and then dashing those hopes in the most dramatic of ways. Being a Cubs fan is intrinsically about being disappointed. But when the Cubs face the Braves in a couple weeks on Opening Day, I’ll be getting my hopes up – along with the rest of the North Side.

Student Life

Perfect pitch: Fight Band looks to fine-tune McGill athletic pride

The McGill Fight Band doesn’t march. They don’t do halftime shows, they don’t wear Napoleonic uniforms, and they don’t have a dance team. If you’re looking for high-stepping, capes, or colour guards, you’re out of luck. But if you’re looking for spirit, look no further – the growing Fight Band does what fight bands are supposed to do and does it well.

“Every coach comes to my office at least once a week to see if the Fight Band is coming to their game, or to lobby to make sure that they’re coming to their games,” said Jeremiah Gordon, McGill Athletics’s promotions director.

Founded in 2006, the band began with less than a dozen members, but has grown into a robust corps of 40. Boasting woodwinds, brass, and percussion, they’ve become a recognizable presence at varsity games, bringing in bigger crowds and keeping them excited.

Like many great ideas, the band was born at Bar des Pins. Ted Smith, a team manager for the McGill basketball team, had just come back from a summer in Japan.

“Japanese sports fans, and especially baseball ones, are fanatics,” he said. “They organize into a kind of brigade, almost a legion of fans. They bring out bugles and trumpets and small brass instruments and devise fight songs for everybody in the batting lineup to cheer them on. I guess it occurred to me then that it wouldn’t be that hard to do something similar at college.”

When he suggested to his friends at the bar that they should try it, they didn’t take him seriously. The following Monday, he went in to see then-Athletics Director Derek Drummond. Drummond asked him what it would cost and how soon it could happen.

“[I told him], ‘Give me your boardroom to run a couple of informational meetings, give me your photocopier to print off advertisements, and then I’ll need $400 for total expenses,” Smith said.

Drummond agreed. Students were eager to join, but securing practice space proved more challenging: initially, the group practiced late at night in the small music classrooms of a Sherbrooke office building.

“And of course, we had to go get stands,” Smith said. “At around 10, we started gathering up stands from people leaving the practice rooms and hauling them across the street.”

The band played at six games that first year. While some fans were apprehensive about the band’s presence, others enjoyed the injection of spirit, and the band began to grow.

“We started making an impact at games, athletes started to notice us, and then it just kind of grew,” Smith said.

Because members were allowed to drink, Smith admits that the band gained a bit of a reputation for rowdiness.

“Initially, we used to go out and party a lot at the games. At a certain part we had gotten so large that it had potential for a problem,” he said. “We never had any fights or anything like that, but some people questioned the appropriateness of our behaviour as a band [while] wearing McGill uniforms.”

Partly in response to their behavior and partly because of their success, McGill Athletics opted for a closer relationship with the band. The new, more formal arrangement has banned members from drinking during games, but has also given the band more money.

“Their repertoire has improved, their size has gotten better and they’re definitely a great feature that we have now at our varsity sporting events,” said Gordon.

And the band hasn’t completely lost its edge. In addition to playing pep-band standards like “Final Countdown” and “Rock and Roll Part 2” during pauses, the band draws on an impressive arsenal of cheer tactics to pump up the home crowd and annoy the visitors.

“The best games are when we get into other players’ heads,” said Kolya Kowalchuk, U3 music, and also the band’s conductor.

Smith, whose main role in the band’s performances was to get cheers going, recalled some of the ways this worked during his time with the band. For instance, the band might single out a particular player to heckle for an entire game, or play with the other team’s timing.

“When the shot clock was winding down in basketball we would start counting five, four, three, two, one when it hit eight seconds,” Smith said. “I can’t even count the amount of times that worked. Then, once they catch on to that we start, counting from eight [when it hits five seconds], so they’d think they had more time than they did, and that worked, too.”

Band members admit that Fight Band can be a way for ex-high-school-band geeks to relive their glory days, but Smith warned against taking that at face value.

“My impression of band kids has changed considerably since starting this thing,” he said. “When I was in high school I always thought of the band geeks as anti-social and not particularly amusing or skillful … but those kids party hard.”

But the Fight Band is not just a party crew, either.

“What Fight Band has done for a lot of people is create a really comfortable environment, [allowing] them to let loose and make a lot of friends,” Smith said.

Taylor Stocks, U2 political science and the band’s premier, agreed.

“We’re a nice family,” she said. “They’re a group of people you can always count on for stuff, the right combination of nerd and love.”

Though the band’s season is over, they should be back bigger and better next year, and will continue to pump up home crowds and irritate visitors for years to come.

Features

Tradition or disaster?

The sudden proliferation of gruesome images of adorable seal pups, the fierce debates between the government and animal rights groups, and the manipulative rhetoric used on both sides are some of the events that can be expected around the time of Canada’s annual commercial seal hunt.

This year, Fisheries and Oceans Minister Gail Shea announced a 50,000 increase in the total number of seals that can be legally hunted – a decision that has incited visceral reactions from animal rights groups, celebrities, politicians and the European Union, who recently banned Canadian seal products from the European market. In the words of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals representative Danielle Katz, “the Canadian seal slaughter is truly Canada’s shame.”

A brief history

The Canadian commercial seal hunt – the largest slaughter of marine wildlife in the world – takes place each year in late March and early April on the Gulf of St. Lawrence and in northeast Newfoundland, where hundreds of thousands of seals are killed in a matter of days.

The commercial seal hunt, which exists for the purpose of collecting seal fur, should not be confused with the Inuit subsistence hunt – an integral part of Inuit culture and tradition in Nunavut and Northern Canada.

“The Inuit subsistence hunt is for a living and total utilization of the animal,” says Bridget Curran, a spokesperson for the Atlantic Canadian Anti-Sealing Coalition. “The commercial seal hunt is a large industrialized slaughter of marine mammals for their fur.”

Anti-sealing groups and animal welfare organizations are particularly incensed by the commercial seal hunt as a result of the harmful way in which seals are killed and their unique targeting of newborns.

“Sealers routinely hook seals in the eye, cheek, or mouth to avoid harming the fur,” says Katz. “Many times, these babies haven’t even learned how to swim before being slaughtered for something nobody needs.”

The quota hike

In light of unprecedented climate changes, ice melting, and high seal pup mortality rates, animal rights organizations asked the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada to cancel the Gulf phase of the annual hunt as a precautionary measure. Shea declined, however, declaring that the decision would have to be made by the sealers. She later announced that the hunt would go ahead – this time with an increased quota – a decision that did not sit well with anti-sealing groups, who saw the decision as politically motivated.

“It’s a typical pugnacious response from the government thumbing their noses at critics and an empty gesture of support for sealers,” says Curran. “The government is desperate to maintain the Atlantic Canadian votes. They know that if they say to the fishing and sealing industry, a powerful voting lobby, ‘you can’t kill surviving pups,’ they will remember that when they go to the polls.”

The government, however, is remaining resolute in the assertion that this year’s quota had nothing to do with politics, and is merely a scientifically-based number that changes annually according to research and statistics.

“The quota, or the total allowable catch, sets an upper limit of what can be sustainably harvested by the sealers in any given year. It’s set based on a number of factors like science, the health of the population, the ice conditions, weather factors, and migration patterns,” explains Alan Balil, of the DFO. “It says this is how much you can harvest without harming the population in the long term, not how many seals we want them to kill.”

Anti-sealing groups believe that other recent gestures from the government testify to the malicious nature of the hike. From the Governor General’s public snacking on a slain seal’s heart in Nunavut last May to parliament’s overwhelming vote to have members of the Canadian Olympic team wear bits of baby seal on their uniforms, and finally, last week’s Parliament luncheon – which served seal meat as the main course – Curran says that the quota hike is consistent with the government’s larger response to the EU’s banning of seal products last year.

“DFO has a track record of sacrificing conservation in the name of economics,” says Curran. “For example, the polar bear has been listed as endangered since 1975, but Canada opposed the ban on the trade so that they can be killed for trophies. Another case in point is cod. They closed and reopened the gulf so many times and upped the quota, that they fished it to commercial extinction.”

According to the Canadian Press, even veteran sealer Jack Troake has said that given the declining demand for seal pelts and declining price. “To us sealers, [the hike] sounds a little stupid.”

Many organizations also allege that the government is taking advantage of the Inuit hunt in the hopes of blurring the line between the two hunts.

“The Canadian government is using the Inuit, whose hunting is not under threat, to push the commercial seal hunt, which is a hideously cruel massacre,” says Katz. “If anything, the EU’s banning of seal products from commercial hunt, which makes up 97 per cent of seal products, wouldn’t harm the Inuit hunt whereas it might now.”

“The Inuit are being used as pawns by the Canadian government by running a campaign to blur the lines between the two hunts in an effort to fool the public into thinking that the seal hunt is necessary and part of Canadian tradition, which it isn’t,” says Curran.

The government disagrees, asserting that the mention of the Inuit seal hunt is only in reference to the genuine concern that the EU’s ban will threaten Inuit industry.

“The Inuit exemption was written into the ban by the EU,” says Balil. “But it’s not going to be effective in practical terms. The ban will affect the infrastructure that [the Inuit] rely on to sell their products.”

The great sealing debate

If the members of the two camps could at least agree on the facts, then much of the debate could be resolved. While the government insists that there is a thriving industry for seal pelts – there were about $10 million in exports to Russia last year – and that they are looking to expand the export of seal meat to China, anti-sealing groups believe that there are no markets in existence.

“To say that the markets are slumping is optimistic,” says Curran. “The truth is that the markets are dead and they’re not coming back. The government is holding out false hopes to the sealers saying that there are new markets in Asia, but they should realize that it’s over instead of wasting millions of our tax dollars.”

The two sides also disagree fundamentally on whether DFO’s goal is really to preserve the seal population or, in fact, to exterminate the population, which some fishermen believe is responsible for the depletion of lucrative commercial fish stocks.

“Decisions that should be based on marine biologists and climate specialists are being left in the hands of fishermen wielding clubs and rifles – men with a vested interest in bringing seals to the brink of extinction and beyond,” says Curran. “This is not a plan for conservation as DFO claims. It’s a plan for extermination.”

The anti-sealing argument hinges on both the notion that the seal population is in danger and that the commercial seal hunt does not kill the animals in a humane way, with DFO adamantly refuting both claims.

“We have scientists who assess the seal populations throughout the year,” says Balil. “This is an ongoing project, we are always managing the state of the stock. It’s a healthy, thriving population, and we’re doing everything we can to make sure that it stays like that.”

Curran says, however, that seals are among top predators like sharks and polar bears that are crucial to the marine ecosystem – and that have both been over-hunted in the past few years. Even if the population is currently healthy, adds Sheryl Fink from the International Fund for Animal Welfare, it is important to be taking a precaution
ary approach given the vast climate changes.

The most controversial point of disagreement is, of course, whether the seals are at least being killed according to humane stipulations. Balil says the hunt is monitored closely, with fishery officers making sure that the sealers – who he assures have been licensed only after a number of years as apprentices – are following a strictly defined three-step process when killing the seal. Fink disagrees, however, arguing that the rapidity of the hunt renders humane killing processes unfeasible.

“Because of the sheer expediency of the hunt – 300,000 killed in a matter of days or weeks – and the geographic areas over which it occurs, it is difficult to monitor or enforce regulations. There are boats competing to meet the quotas, so they’re trying to get the skins off as many seals as quickly as possible before the ice melts.”

And as for all the ghastly images attesting to the gruesome and wasteful nature of the seal hunt? Balil says the issue has been dramatized and manipulated by animal rights groups.

“Some groups have done very well at pulling at emotional strings using some images of white coats, which cannot be legally harvested in Canada,” he explains. “But they still use those images because they appeal to emotions rather than the facts. Seal hunting is also a particularly emotional issue because it happens in full view. Anyone can request an observer permit – that’s how they get those images.”

Whether the seal population is really endangered, whether animal welfare practices are being followed, and whether there really is a market for seal products, are all questions that need to be resolved before the two parties can agree on how to proceed.

While Katz avows that Canada’s image will be equated with the seal kill until the slaughter is stopped, Balil says, “there’s a lot of misinformation out there. It’s difficult to judge from a distance, but I can tell you that the compliance rate has been quite high.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue