Latest News

Sports

Controversy in the cold: Katie Uhlaender makes accusations of Olympic sabotage

The International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation (IBSF) has denied the allegations of Olympic ‘sabotage’ involving the Canadian national team and cleared the coaching staff of any wrongdoing. The controversy stems from American skeleton veteran Katie Uhlaender, a five-time Olympian whose hopes of competing at a sixth Winter Games Milano Cortina were swiped from her despite winning a key qualifying race. 

The disagreement came down to how skeleton athletes earn Olympic qualification points. Points are not only based on finishing position, but are also tied to the size of the field. The more athletes in a race, the more points are available. In this situation, four of the six Canadian women who had originally been entered in a North American Cup race in Lake Placid from Jan. 7 to 11 were withdrawn before competition. That significantly reduced the field size, which lowered the total points that could be earned. Although Uhlaender won the race, the reduced points haul meant she could no longer qualify for the Olympics.

Uhlaender, one of the most experienced athletes in the sport, accused the Canadian head coach of intentionally withdrawing athletes to manipulate the points system. From her perspective, the decision was a strategic move to protect Canada’s Olympic spots by limiting the ability of rival athletes to earn points. This was perceived as a clear message that even winning was not enough when tactical decisions could override performance.

Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton (BCS) has strongly rejected those allegations. The organization insists the withdrawals had nothing to do with points or Olympic strategy, but instead had everything to do with athlete welfare. According to BCS, the athletes who were pulled were young and relatively inexperienced, and they had already endured a difficult week on a demanding track. After assessing their readiness, coaches concluded the athletes were not prepared to race for a third consecutive time, and withdrawing them was framed as a responsible decision rooted in safety and long-term development.

This clash of perspectives highlights why the situation has become so controversial. On one hand, Uhlaender’s frustration is entirely understandable. Winning a qualifying race is usually the only thing that matters, and for athletes who have worked for so long to achieve this dream, having it stripped away would be devastating. The idea that another team’s roster decisions can determine the value of a victory feels fundamentally wrong, especially for something as highly regarded as Olympic qualification.

On the other hand, Canada’s explanation cannot be dismissed outright. Coaches regularly make judgment calls about athlete readiness and risk, particularly in extreme sports like this, where mistakes can lead to serious injury. Athlete safety is not a convenient excuse; it is a legitimate reason and is necessary to protect the team and its athletes.

The deeper issue seems to lie not in proving malicious intent, but in the structure of the qualification system itself. The fact that this controversy is even possible exposes a colossal flaw in how points are awarded. A system where the withdrawal of athletes could alter another competitor’s participation is logistically unsound. Even if Canada acted in good faith, it is hard not to see how it could have been manipulated. 

Ultimately, this controversy is not just about Canada versus the United States or athlete versus federation. It is about whether Olympic qualification systems truly reflect athletic performance. The investigation may have determined responsibility, but it is clear to see that when winning on the track is not enough, the system itself needs reform. Olympic dreams should fall to the fate of hard work and performance, not the unintended consequences of decisions made behind the scenes. 

Student Life

Making the most of your final semester

Your final semester is a liminal space: A mere 13 weeks in which past, present, and future warp relentlessly into one another. The library that sheltered you in your darkest hour no longer feels like home, but it is not yet a memory either. You half-listen to a lecture by your favourite professor, mentally rehearsing post-grad plans. Swept in the undercurrents of fear and excitement, it can feel that you’re already half elsewhere. But your last semester will draw to a close, whether you savour it or not: As a tenant of this tenuous time, you can choose whether to let it pass unremarkably or allow it to shape a deliberate, meaningful goodbye. 

Be present

The impending end of student life may usher in a host of forward-thinking concerns. Amidst the chaos of inevitable LinkedIn rabbit holes and polarizing grad school Reddit threads, do not get lost in the future while your present moment escapes you. For some, this might mean refraining from filling out applications while sitting in class. For others, mindfulness may constitute taking mental notes of the way the afternoon light filters through a library window or allowing yourself to linger in the small, unremarkable moments of campus life that once felt permanent and now feel transient. Before the deadlines, decisions, and titles trickle in, making constant attempts to define your adult life, there is value in remembering who you were when your primary obligation was to learn—and in recognizing that this version of yourself deserves your full attention, if only for a little while longer.

Make time for friends

At a time when plans are postponed in favour of productivity and conversations are cut short by the pressures of what comes next, try to use these final months to exist alongside those who have shaped and supported you at this stage in your life. Make time for shared meals, late-night talks, and the long way home. Be honest, caring, and kind. The assignments will be submitted and the emails will be answered, but the moments shared among friends are the ones you will reach for when campus life becomes something you speak about in the past tense.

Visit the places you love

McGill students come from over 150 countries, and many will leave Montreal after graduating. Take the time to visit the places that have made this city home. Whether it’s the cafe that witnessed your first nervous midterm season, the park where conversations stretched long after the sun set, or the slushy streets that sent you off to class, these spaces have held versions of you that will not return in quite the same way. A complete goodbye bids adieu to places too.

Express gratitude

Allow the constant stream of reflection to make way for gratitude. As you take stock of the moments that have shaped you, turn your attention to the people who made them possible. Thank the mentor who made you a better leader, the friend who always listened, and the professor whose encouragement made all the difference. Gratitude does not need to be elaborate or performative; you can channel it into a brief message, a simple acknowledgment, or a conversation you have been meaning to initiate. These expressions may seem small, but they have weight for both you and the recipient. In recognizing the support you received, you affirm that no chapter of your life is written alone—and that this one, too, was shaped by more than just your own efforts.

Arts & Entertainment, Pop Rhetoric

Welcome back, 2016

Today’s agenda: Perfecting your duck face, finding the rarest Pokémon on PokemonGo, and blasting Zara Larsson‘s “Lush Life” from your iPod touch. Bliss.

History may not repeat itself, but trends do—and right now, nostalgia is staging a dramatic return. According to the BBC, TikTok searches for ‘2016’ have risen by 452 per cent in the past two weeks. The minimalist, muted tones of 2025 are out, and the unapologetic cringe of 2016 is back in.

In honour of 2016’s comeback, here are the ultimate throwback highlights in fashion, pop culture, and music.

Skinny jeans

Skinny jeans were an absolute staple in every 2016 wardrobe. Looking to find something more unique? Why not try ripped skinny jeans, or pair them with your favourite Converse high-tops? Brands released skinny jeans in all colours and styles, with American Eagle and Old Navy leading the way.  Icons like Kendall Jenner, Gigi Hadid, and Jennifer Lawrence turned skinny jeans into a must-have look. While baggy jeans now dominate, skinny jeans still hold a sacred place in fashion history. It even seems as though skinny jeans are making a comeback—whether this is a blessing or a curse is up for debate.

Coachella

Hosted in Indio, California, Coachella was not just a music festival, it was the music festival of 2016. Known as the defining event of the time, Coachella was what every teen and young adult dreamed of. Those lucky enough to attend planned for months, while everyone else refreshed their Instagram feeds and Snapchat stories in desperate anticipation. Influencers flooded their feeds with sporting flower crowns, boho-chic, and peace signs. Coachella 2016 was the biggest Coachella to date, making $84 million USD in revenue. Headliners included Major Lazer, Guns n’ Roses, Calvin Harris, and Sia. It wasn’t just a festival; it was a place of self-expression, and a symbol of the cultural moment of freedom and community defined by social media, fashion, and music.

Musical.ly

Before TikTok’s rebrand, we called it ‘Musical.ly.’ The app allowed users to create short, lip-synced videos to popular songs and trending sounds, turning everyday teenagers into viral stars overnight. Lisa and Lena, teenage twins from Germany, went viral on the app for making dancing videos. In March 2016 alone, their number of followers increased by 256 per cent, bringing them from 112,000 to 377,000 followers. Musical.ly became a launchpad for influencers, musicians, and artists alike, encouraging creativity, humour, and self-expression. It had something for everyone, from beauty influencers like Baby Ariel to upcoming young artists like Jacob Sartorius. Its popularity highlighted a shift in how young people consumed media. It was a clear indicator of shifting focus from long-form media to short, fast-paced digital content.

 The Mannequin Challenge

Speaking of social media, the Mannequin Challenge was a must-try with all your friends. The trend involved groups imitating mannequins, while Rae Sremmurd’s “Black Beatles” played in the background. Soon, this trend spread to family gatherings and classrooms. One of the most famous Mannequin Challenge videos was titled ‘High School Mannequin Challenge 1500 Students’ and was uploaded by a teacher at a secondary school. This video alone had 9.4 million views. It even reached some well-known faces, from Beyoncé and The Rock to Michelle Obama and the New York Giants.

YouTube

Instead of high-tech, polished studios and scripts, YouTube allowed viewers to watch content filmed in something as simple as a bedroom. Liza Koshy was just 19 when she began making funny YouTube videos at home, but gained over five million followers almost overnight, leading her to win the Streamy’s 2016 Breakout Creator award. Creators like PewDiePie, who had more than 50 million subscribers in 2016, rose to the top by yelling at video games, somehow building a fanbase larger than many TV networks. They even coined their own name—the ‘Bro Army.’ On the other side of the platform, creators like Emma Chamberlain took over with chaotic vlogs, challenges, and fashion videos. Her popularity came from the personal connection she built with viewers. These forms of videos offered something television couldn’t: Intimacy and immediacy. YouTube remains a major entertainment platform today, exemplifying the idea that anyone with a camera could be a star.

And finally, the ultimate playlist of 2016

 Justin Bieber, “Love Yourself” – The perfect breakup anthem. 

 Major Lazer, “Lean On“- A must-play at any house party, club, or event that involves dancing.

Drake, “One Dance” – Smooth, rhythmic, and the perfect beat for a chilled summer night.

The Chainsmokers, “Closer” – A nostalgic and catchy pop hit, perfect for sing-alongs.

Mike Posner, “I Took a Pill In Ibiza” – For those who are at a beach club somewhere, or who wish they were.

Prof Profiles, Science & Technology

Meet your prof: Nikolas Provatas

Despite being friends with several physics majors, when discussions of gravity and inertia inevitably shift into abstract theory, I can’t help but wonder, what is physics all about, anyway? 

If you’re studying science or engineering here at McGill—or just interested in the mysterious inner workings of physics overall—there’s a pretty high chance you’ll find yourself at some point or another sitting in Leacock 132, as one in a sea of 650 students, taking an introductory physics class. 

PHYS 102 is one such introductory course. In this introduction to electromagnetism, students learn the fundamentals of electric current, circuits, magnetism, and optics. These concepts are not only interesting but foundational to later studies in physics and engineering, and McGill students are in good hands: PHYS 102 is taught by Nikolas Provatas, a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair and member of the Department of Physics.

Like many scientists, Provatas traces his interest in science to early childhood. In an interview with The Tribune, he recalls being just seven years old when a picture book about Galileo Galilei and his theory of the pendulum captivated him.

“At that age, I had no clue about equations or anything, but I remember the text said that [Galilei] observed [his theory] by watching […] how long it takes the chandelier to swing,” Provatas explained. “So when I would go with my father to [his] restaurant in the morning, around 5:30 a.m. […] it would take a long time till things got busy. [So], I remember I took up a string, and I tied a little mass at the end of it. I can’t even remember what it was, [it] must have been a cup or something. And I would tie it somewhere, and I would just swing it in the kitchen and just watch it. And I remember my father looking at me, thinking, you know, like, ‘Do something productive with your life,’ [….] And I thought, ‘This is productive. The scientist did this. I’m trying to figure out how it works.’”

From here, Provatas’ curiosity continued to grow, eventually leading him through post-secondary education; he graduated from McGill with a PhD in theoretical physics in the late 1990s. 

Given that he was interested in how the world works and why it works the way it does, Provatas found theoretical physics to be a natural fit. Unlike experimental physics, which focuses on data collection and analysis, theoretical physics relies on math and other models to explain phenomena. 

After completing his PhD, Provatas went on to complete two postdoctoral positions—temporary research positions—where he explored different areas of physics. He emphasized the importance of these experiences, describing them as the academic equivalent of a doctor’s residency training.

“Labs hire you on a contract basis, and say, ‘Solve a problem or do something interesting, and then we’ll pay you to do that, and then we publish together.’ So I do the work, I publish, and then they provide me [with] some environment [or] ideas,” Provatas said.

His first postdoc was in Helsinki, Finland. 

“I spent three years at the University of Helsinki, at their Institute for Theoretical Physics, doing work there on something called Percolation theory,” Provatas explained. “It’s a theory of how random things diffuse through materials so as to percolate through them, and this is very important when considering the structure of materials, ranging from paper to even metals.”

After his time in Finland, he completed a second three-year postdoctoral appointment at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). 

It was after this second postdoc that Provatas began searching for stable work. Life as a postdoc is inherently uncertain; each job is contracted for a specified number of years, after which researchers are left to find new roles, potentially on opposite ends of the globe.

“I literally owned nothing because I knew that in any apartment I would go, whether here as a PhD, in Helsinki as a postdoc, [in the] United States as a postdoc, I knew I couldn’t really buy stuff because I’d be on the move in a couple of years,” Provatas explained. “So literally, I would just have my backpack and a suitcase to hold some clothes, and that was my whole ownership at that time.”

At UIUC, he worked under two professors: one in statistical thermodynamics and another in mechanical engineering. Mentorship from this engineer proved to be pivotal to Provatas’s future career, as he taught him how to communicate his research in ‘engineering terms’ rather than purely theoretical language

“He taught me how to talk the talk and walk the walk of engineers, and to focus on what’s important when you sales pitch your stuff to engineers versus just pure scientists,” Provatas said. “And he actually made me wear a suit to give conferences. And I started to go to engineering conferences and give seminars.”

It was through attending these engineering conferences that Provatas was able to land a job at Bush Paper Company, working as a Research and Development scientist. Eventually, through his work at Bush, Provatas was invited to apply for a professorship at McMaster University—not in the physics department, but rather in the materials science and engineering department.

“I thought, ‘Oh, boy, you know, this is nice.’ I’ve always wanted to be a prof, but I thought it’d be a physics prof.” Provatas said. “I didn’t know I’d go work as an engineering prof. So I practiced and practiced and got over the fear, and I went and gave an interview, and to my shock, they hired me.” 

Provatas worked at McMaster for 11 years. It was only after an opportunity to teach physics at the university level—as opposed to materials science and engineering—that Provatas left McMaster. This opportunity was from none other than McGill University. 

“I’ve been here since 2012, teaching physics, doing research on the same topic. I’m still a material scientist, but looking at it from a very physics[-oriented] point of view,” Provatas explained. “What ultimately made me make the transition from an engineering department to a physics department, is that you know, you can ask the questions that, on one hand, they could be useful, but on the other hand, it could be very impractical, but you know, it’s there. So, ‘Why does gravity work?’ So someone might say,’ Oh, come on, do something important [and] practical with your life,’ but [gravity is] there. I see it. It acts on me every day.”

As a professor, whether at McMaster or at McGill, Provatas has always taught freshman courses. Classes like PHYS 102 allow him to connect his research to his course content, finding ways to keep the material engaging and interesting for students. 

“I always like to take what dry theory we’re learning, and say, you know, ‘this is important, because power generation works this way. Let me show you how making material works this way. An aircraft works this way.’ And I find that students like the fact that it is connected to the real world. It’s not just ‘Oh, I’m sitting here in a physics class learning all these equations.’”

Provatas’s current research focuses on understanding the microstructures of material—in other words, how they form and how they respond to material phase changes.  

“If you now explore the depths of this material, at the level of atoms and thereabouts, you start to see that the material is just not some monolithic, boring object. It’s a myriad of interesting patterns [and] that the atoms [are] forming the tapestry of a solid form,” Provatas explained. “My research focuses on why these patterns form […] how they form, [and] what controls their formation. And it’s beautiful.”

This semester, Provatas is teaching PHYS 102 and PHYS 657—but anyone interested in learning more about physics or materials science is welcome to stop by his office hours: 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Mondays, in Rutherford 218.

While Provatas’s path to McGill wasn’t linear, his interests and curiosity led him to a career of research that his seven-year-old self may not have even been able to imagine. Ultimately, Provatas shows that the trick to life is the same as the answers to PHYS 102: Achieving through dedication and hard work, and seizing the opportunities in front of you.

Know Your Athlete, Sports

Know Your Athlete: Luca Nicoletti

McGill Athletics announced on Nov. 20 that it would cut the Track and Field program. Just nine days later, Luca Nicoletti, U3 Engineering, shattered the team’s longest-standing record by breaking the 300-meter dash mark that had stood since 1986. Nicoletti clocked a 34.11-second finish—three milliseconds faster than Earl Haughton’s 34.14-second record—at the Martlets Open Meet on Nov. 29, the team’s first competition of the season. In an interview with The Tribune, Nicoletti reflected on his emotions before and after the race.

“Going into the meet alone was insane because our team was getting cancelled. I had ‘SAVE MCGILL TRACK’ written all over my arms. I wanted to show the school that our team is still competitive,” Nicoletti said. “After the race and seeing the time was exciting. I’m like, at least [McGill Athletics] gets to know what they are missing out on.”

Nicoletti’s expectations were high going into this meet. After showing consistent progress over the summer, he wanted to break 34 seconds, putting him closer to the Tomlinson Fieldhouse record of 32.94 seconds set by Shane Niemi from York University in 2014. He also hopes to get a spot on the podium at the U SPORTS Track & Field Championships in March.

“I think [breaking 34 seconds] will come this season, but this was a mini-achievement and a mini-milestone on the way to U SPORTS, which was super exciting.”

Nicoletti started his track career at École secondaire catholique Paul-Desmarais in Ottawa, where he represented his high school team. However, he began training outside of school at the Ottawa Lions Club in 2019 at his friend’s insistence. Nicoletti competed in the Ontario Federation of School Athletic Associations Championship youth category that year, placing first and second in the 100-metre hurdles and 300-metre hurdles, respectively. 

“I was like a big success off of very little training, so it solidified it as a sport for me there,” Nicoletti said. 

Despite both his early promise and recent success, Nicoletti endured a serious hamstring injury during his first year on the McGill team. During his recovery, he prioritized regaining his speed, which ultimately led him to transition to short-distance events. Having moved away from his family a few months earlier, Nicoletti found it especially difficult to cope with the setback. 

“I was losing two things I was comfortable with. I was away from my family, and I would have had the familiarity of track, but I lost that as well,” Nicoletti said. “Watching others get better wasn’t the worst part of it, but it was more just not getting to do the things I love doing.”

His injury, however, led him to appreciate the sport even more. 

“On my recovery journey, every workout was painful, but I was just smiling. I remember the first summer back, my friend and I threw up after training. He was like, ‘Man, this sucks.’ I was like, ‘I’m just happy I can do this.’”

Nicoletti also attributed the success of his recovery journey to his coach, Tyrone Edge, and his teammates.

“Coach Edge is really good with competitive athletes, and he helped me get back into fashion after my injury,” Nicoletti said. “I think you have to have the self-discipline to train on your own, but you need your teammates to make the pain throughout the season worth it.”

Entering his third season with the team, Nicoletti approached training with far greater intention, restructuring nearly every aspect of his life around track. He began taking his diet more seriously, closely monitoring his protein intake and incorporating supplements that support recovery. 

While his dedication paid off, the news of the track team’s cut casts a lingering shadow over the moment, complicating what should have been a purely celebratory milestone.

“It’s bittersweet because what if my record is the last one that gets recorded? People are coming up to me and saying how you might have it forever, but I want the rookies under me to be able to challenge it and break it.”

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

‘Cutlass’: A story of fleeting and forgotten queer love

Jan. 15 marked the opening night for Cutlass’s debut workshop performance at Tuesday Night Café Theatre, directed by Ruby Isaacs and written by Elise Holbrook. The show follows pirates Anne Bonny (Elise Holbrook, U2 Music Composition) and Mary Read (Abby Wyland, U3 Art History Honours), who sailed the Caribbean in the summer of 1720. Both Anne and Mary disguised themselves as men on their excursion to ensure their safety, but the moment they discovered their mutual secret, their relationship ignited. 

The show features a live band of cello, violin, and piano, which elevates the drama in each scene. The score spans a wide range of emotions, with the cello evoking a dark moodiness while the piano uplifts the score, conveying excitement. The dialogue also drives the emotional rollercoaster: You’ll laugh at the absurd jokes made by the comedic-relief pirates, then cry as Anne and Mary’s relationship faces its tragic fate. 

Anne is a complex character whose story completely enraptures the audience. She is eccentric and angry, yet her chaotic humour makes her lovable. Among the crew of pirates, she stands out as the life of the party and excites the other crew members with her stories. Mary, on the other hand, is awkward, making her passionate love for Anne result in tears for the audience. The physicality between the two pirates emphasizes their chemistry. Specifically, the staging of their duets highlighted their relationship dynamic. Starting from opposite ends of the stage, they would get closer with each note, illustrating their attempted restraint overpowered by the strength of their feelings for each other. 

Their love story is particularly important because, throughout history, queer romance has been criminalized and erased from literary narratives. The love between these two women was written off as “a close friendship,” concealing the truth. Learning about sapphics from the 1700s is critical in modern times because it emphasizes the fact that queer people have always existed. Queer people have made history—and will continue to make history—just as these two women have. Seeing this musical offers both a learning experience and a chance for audience members to connect with both the story and queer historical figures. 

The music in the show is ethereal. Anne and Mary have several duets throughout the musical, with many moments of mystical harmonization, capturing their intense feelings. Their siren-like voices blend together beautifully, with Anne’s soprano voice balancing well with Mary’s longing alto voice. 

“If you burn, I burn with you.” This powerful line spoken just before a kiss illustrates their willingness to face the danger that their love brings. They accept the risk of punishment for their queerness, choosing to endure it together forever.

The costumes and set are also astonishing. These are the types of outfits you can imagine a pirate from the 1700s wearing; the details of each outfit both convey the time period and reflect each character’s personality. The small, intimate theatre invites the audience onto the ship. 

The end of the show took my breath away. The pirate ship gets seized, the crewmates are hanged, and the two women are imprisoned. The final scene was brought to life by Golbrook’s heartbreaking scream upon realizing that Mary is dead. This devastating ending highlights the impermanence of love, reminding us to appreciate those we love, even if it means rejecting social boundaries. 


25 per cent of Cutlass ticket sale proceeds went to Watermelon Sisters, an organization based in Chicago that provides humanitarian aid in Gaza.

Montreal, News

Activist groups across Montreal unite against U.S. military invasion of Venezuela

On Jan. 11, 10 activist groups in Montreal joined together for a demonstration against the military invasion of Venezuela. The protest began at 2:00 p.m. at 1134 rue St.-Catherine Ouest, with members of each group holding signs representing their organizations and condemning the United States’ recent actions in Venezuela.

The United States Army’s Delta Force unit conducted ‘Operation Absolute Resolve’ on Jan. 3. The military mission captured and transported the president of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores to Manhattan for prosecution on charges of conspiracy to possess and the possession of machine guns and destructive devices, as well as conspiracy to import cocaine. Maduro has also been charged with narco-terrorism.

Operation Absolute Resolve follows escalating U.S. military interventions in Venezuela, with the intention to curb drug trafficking from South America into the U.S. On Sept. 2, U.S. President Donald Trump carried out the first military strike on a water vessel connected to the drug trade. All 11 people on board were killed in what Democratic senators have likened to execution without trial. 34 additional strikes were conducted between then and Jan. 3, killing at least 115 people. The United Nations has described it as a violation of international human rights law. 

Following Maduro’s capture, there have been mixed reactions among Venezuelans. While some citizens have expressed gratitude for the United States’ interference given Maduro’s history of corruption, others have expressed deep concern for Trump’s plans for the U.S. to run Venezuela in Maduro’s absence.

In Montreal, protesters focused on how U.S. interference could harm the already shaky democratic system in Venezuela, allowing the U.S. to take advantage of the power vacuum for its own economic gain.

The Revolutionary Communist Party (RCI) held a table on the corner of rue St.-Catherine and rue Stanley, where the demonstration was set to begin. They offered informative pamphlets on their mission as well as reading materials on capitalism and imperialism across the globe. 

In an interview with The Tribune, a representative from the RCI, who wished to remain anonymous, explained that the United States’ intervention in Venezuela is directly tied to capitalistic motives, claiming that Trump was not seeking to free those in Venezuela from dictatorship, but to instead gain access to the largest oil reserves in the world. 

“We know that there are people in Venezuela who are partying right now because Maduro is gone, but I believe that this positive energy will soon go away because the conditions there will not get better,” the representative said. “If you kidnap some politician, or you kill them, it’s not gonna make a change.”

At around 2:30 p.m., an event organizer made a speech to launch the march. The organizer explained that while demonstrations such as this one are effective at rallying the public, they often go unnoticed by government officials who can take meaningful legal action. 

“I thank you for your camaraderie, for coming out, but we need to think about what comes next,” the organizer said. “We don’t want to just keep doing the same thing and going through the motions and sending petitions to a government that, quite frankly, doesn’t give a single fuck about us.”

The event organizer also emphasized the need for Canadians to take a more vocal stance against imperialism in their daily lives, calling for citizens to observe and criticize the country’s own colonial history alongside that of the United States.

“I wanted to speak to our position here in the imperial core, or at least in the embarrassing appendage to the imperial court that is the USA,” they said. “We have no moral high ground to take, […] especially if you are a settler here, accepting comfort at the expense of Indigenous Peoples or any peoples throughout the world.”

The crowd of protesters began to march down rue St.-Catherine, periodically pausing to light American flags on fire. At the corner of rue St.-Catherine and av. Union, the march came into contact with a separate protest for Palestine. The two joined together as one voice, both crowds chanting, “Free, free Palestine.” One protester brought an Israeli flag to be burned alongside the American one. The march continued on, with the pro-Palestinian crowd moving in a separate direction.

A demonstration organizer from Socialist Unity who wished to remain anonymous shared with The Tribune that this meeting was coincidental, and that the solidarity between the two groups is a naturally occurring outcome of similar fights against imperialism across the globe.   

“There is a role for every person on Canadian soil to play, to stand in solidarity with the Venezuelan people, to defend the achievements of the Bolivarian revolution, and to resist imperial aggression,” they said. “Everybody who’s here needs to be talking to the people in their lives […] to come up with the strategies that are going to make a difference beyond just protesting in the streets [….] It’s good to bring people together, but if we keep only protesting, then we’re not going to make any significant difference.”

The march concluded at Complexe Guy-Favreau, where protesters gathered to hear speeches from each activist group before departing.

Jela de la Peña, a representative of Anakbayan Montreal, a Filipino youth organization dedicated to fighting for social democracy with a socialist perspective, told the crowd that working-class people bear the hardest consequences of imperialist action. She further stated that exploitation through conquest, such as that of the United States’ intervention in Venezuela, is a tactic often used by imperialist forces.

“Filipinos and Venezuela are bound by the same imperialist fists. The same system that drove bombs on Mindoro, Philippines, is the same system that has bombed, sanctioned, and strangled Venezuela for decades,” de la Peña said. “This is about silence. Venezuelans know this pattern well, just like we are told Venezuela is a narco state, that its leaders are criminals. These are old lies. These are recycled propaganda […] used to justify invasion, sanctions, coup and plunder.” 

De la Peña continued, echoing the sentiments of several other activist groups present.

“Why Venezuela? Because it holds the largest proven oil reserves in the world […] The U.S. monopoly capitalists do not care about Venezuela. It does not care about people. It only cares about profit, about control, about domination. This is why […] Filipino and Venezuelan struggles are inseparable. Our shared enemy is U.S. imperialism,” de la Peña said. “Together, we say our lives are not collateral, our lands are not for sale, and together, across borders, we refuse to be silenced.”

Off the Board, Opinion

The bittersweet reality of homesickness

You just arrived at the airport. It’s snowing white everywhere. Security agents shout at you to go to the right line, and police officers coldly ask your reasons for entering the country. An eternity passes before you are reunited with your suitcases. You just made it back to Montreal. And that feeling, the strange mix of loneliness, emptiness, and nostalgia, serves as a reminder that you can belong to more than one place at the same time. 

For those who had the chance to go home for the winter break, going back can feel like a blessing. All of a sudden, the weight of having to survive on your own dissolves—it’s like a trip back to childhood. You just sit, and the world rearranges itself around you. No more worrying about buying groceries; the kitchen smells like things you forgot you loved; someone asks if you have eaten.

Your bed waits for you, exactly the way you left it. Your room is full of outdated decorations you swore you would change one day but never did. Posters, old books, dusty souvenirs, all proof that time passed while you weren’t looking.

Then you see your friends, walk to the same bar. The city has not changed, but somehow everything has. You all order the same drinks, and just like that, the conversations pick up exactly where they left off.

You catch up on the local drama: Who still hasn’t left town, who finally got a job, who got married, who broke up, who no one has heard from in years. For a while, you forget that you left. In that way, coming back also feels like a curse. Just when you get used to it, you have to leave again. The goodbye only grows heavier, like a quiet reminder of how far apart we really are from the ones we love and the ones that love us. 

Distance stops being a Speed x Time calculation and starts becoming something tangible. It lives in your chest, in your heart, in the way your throat tightens at airport gates.

So you try to prepare yourself. You avoid the rituals of arrival. You skip class during Add/Drop period, let your suitcase—still not yet unpacked—gather dust in the corner of your room. You repeat to yourself that you’re just passing through, that this is temporary.

But the truth is, it always gets to you.

You settle in without meaning to. You learn the streets again, you find your way back into your classes. You reconnect with your friends, your roommates. Days become longer and brighter. You start planning for Igloofest and going on study dates at McLennan. You return to bar crawling on Saint-Laurent or Crescent. You stop checking the time difference. You stop calling home every day.

For reading week, you hesitate between renting a cabin in the woods, finally visiting New York, or actually reading? Visiting your family can wait, you tell yourself. And that’s when you realize you belong. You’re busy now; you have a life here, so much so that when summer break approaches, the ache returns.

You pack your life into a suitcase again. You start counting goodbyes like a ritual: Last class, last metro ride, last late night, last hug. It stings, but only because you have settled in so fully, because the streets, the friends, the routines have become yours again.

So if, coming back from break, nostalgia weighs on you, if your chest feels too full, know this: It’s not permanent. You’re not failing at being away. You’re just learning how to live in more than one place.

Homesickness hurts because it shows how deeply we belong. For international students, this feeling becomes a paradox: We don’t want to leave the home where we grew up, yet we also don’t want to leave the city where we have become someone new, where we have grown in ways we never imagined. 

The ache of leaving is both a reminder and a gift; it proves that we have the capacity to carry multiple homes in our hearts, wherever we go.

Commentary, Opinion

Keeping Montreal alive means letting shops stay open late

It’s 7 p.m. on a Saturday night, and you have nothing to wear. Rushing out the door, you take to St. Laurent in search of the perfect, innovative solution to a closet lacking inspiration: Another black top. Yet, no matter where you look, every store is closed: La Caravane, CUL-DE-SAC, even Throwback Vault—they’re all lit by the neon luminescence of a sign reading “fermé.”

Your shopping misfortune isn’t new. It dates back to June 22, 1990, when the Quebec government passed the ‘Act Respecting Hours and Days of Admission to Commercial Establishments,’ or Bill H-2.1. Originally framed as a way to promote time with family and protect small businesses from burnout, Bill H-2.1 requires that all businesses close at 9 p.m. on weekdays and 5 p.m. on weekends.

The bill makes exceptions for establishments serving food and drink, cultural centres, businesses operating in airports, and pharmacies, but most major retailers are forced to close well before the feeling of an impending wardrobe malfunction sets in.

However, on Dec. 8, the Quebec government announced a major revision to Bill H-2.1, allowing retailers to remain open until 9 p.m. on weekends, effectively standardizing weekday hours across the entire week. 

In a city like Montreal, defined by spontaneity and a vibrant nightlife, the regulations that exist under Bill H-2.1 undermine the very local establishments they claim to protect, pushing consumers online instead. 

Samuel Poulin, Quebec’s Minister for the Economy and Small and Medium Enterprises, explained that the shift in hours became necessary as local and small businesses were increasingly forced to compete with major online sellers, including ultra-fast fashion retailers like Shein and Temu. In fact, nearly 60 per cent of businesses in Quebec have reported drops in sales due to competition with foreign e-retailers.

When small businesses lose foot-traffic because shoppers aren’t able to make purchases in person, they do not merely lose profit. They are replaced by massive online fulfillment warehouses. An outdated relic of Quebec’s past, Bill H-2.1 incentivizes consumers to seek less environmentally conscious—and less ethically-produced—options when in-person stores are closed at inconvenient hours. 

With textiles being the fifth-largest category of plastic waste sent to landfills in Canada, and the fashion industry representing 10 per cent of Canadian greenhouse gas emissions, it is critical that in-person shopping experiences are protected to ensure accessibility. Without them, shoppers default to online fast-fashion, with its familiar waste-generating refrains: “This doesn’t fit,” “this doesn’t look like the picture,” or “this isn’t comfortable to wear.” When customers are able to shop in person, avoidable problems relating to garment quality and fit no longer lead to the discarding of usable fashion items. Instead, these unfavourable items are merely returned to the rack. 

Even the original motivation behind Bill H-2.1 of “promoting family time” no longer reflects the needs of individuals working in Quebec. Many Montrealers—from students, to part-time workers, to those with irregular working schedules—are forced to adapt their lives around arbitrary, outdated closing times instead of relishing the flexibility to shop ethically and conveniently. What was once framed as protection for the working class has evolved to impose constraints on both consumers and small businesses, limiting economic opportunity and Montreal’s social and cultural dynamism.

Montreal’s streets—lovingly pedestrianized during the summer months, and in some cases, all year round—lose their charm as sites of cultural events, social interaction, and, of course, window-shopping. Bill H-2.1’s provisions encourage the city’s social nature to come to a stiff halt at 5 p.m.—far before a ‘move’ for the night even emerges.

Poulin’s plan, a welcome revision to existing business hours standards, realigns the accessibility of retail shopping with Montreal’s social fabric. This amended policy allows late-night foot traffic, spontaneous window-shopping, and engagement with local neighbourhoods to strengthen and sustain the economic survival of small businesses.

Behind the Bench, Sports

Parity rules the postseason as the NFL Playoffs open the door to a new champion in Super Bowl LX

Disclaimer: This piece was written before the Divisional Round games which took place Jan. 17 and Jan. 18. 

As the National Football League (NFL) Playoffs move into the Divisional Round, one thing is increasingly clear: This postseason is defined less by dominance and more by high-pressure execution. With both teams from last year’s Super Bowl eliminated before January’s second weekend, the league has entered a rare moment of competitive balance. 

Wild Card Weekend reflected what the regular season suggested: Small edges matter. The Buffalo Bills (12–5) survived a tight 27-24 win over the Jacksonville Jaguars behind late-game efficiency and field position discipline. Buffalo finished the season with a top-five total offence (401.5 yards per game) and a top-10 scoring defence, a balance that has kept them competitive even when games tighten.

The Houston Texans (12–5) delivered the most decisive Wild Card performance, dismantling the Pittsburgh Steelers 30-6. Houston allowed just 17.4 points per game across the regular season—the second-fewest in the NFL—and converted that defensive consistency into playoff control.

In the National Football Conference (NFC), the Los Angeles Rams (10–7) edged the Carolina Panthers 34-31, leaning on red-zone efficiency rather than volume. The Chicago Bears (9–8) upset the Green Bay Packers 31-27, continuing a late-season surge.

The New England Patriots’ (14–3) dominant 16-3 win over the Los Angeles Chargers stood out not for explosiveness, but for control. They forced three turnovers and allowed fewer than 300 total yards, which is a formula that has defined their season.

The Bills travel to face the Denver Broncos (14–3), whose defence ranked top-seven in points allowed (311) and thrived in low-possession games. Denver’s 8–1 home record adds another layer to what is likely the American Football Conference (AFC)’s most volatile matchup. Denver enters as the top seed. The Bills finished the regular season among the league’s most productive offences and have shown the ability to score in bursts, which is a critical trait against a defence designed to compress games. If Buffalo avoids early turnovers, it may increase its chances against an opposition that is set to take the victory. 

Houston’s trip to Foxborough pits pace against patience. The Patriots finished the season with the conference’s best point differential at +170 and went 8–0 away from home. Houston’s speed and offensive balance have powered one of the league’s most impressive turnarounds, but New England has succeeded in neutralizing teams that play with rhythm. The Patriots force opponents to sustain long drives and win situational downs: third-and-long, red zone, and late halves. If the game slows as expected, New England’s control becomes more pronounced. 

In the NFC, San Francisco faces Seattle, and Seattle’s advantage here is not explosiveness but resilience. While San Francisco remains talented, their late-season inconsistency and attrition have left them vulnerable in close games. Seattle, by contrast, has been comfortable playing through contact and capitalizing on short fields. In a matchup that figures to stay close into the fourth quarter, the Seahawks’ balance and physicality give them the upper hand. 

Finally, the Rams meet the Bears. Chicago’s late-season surge has been one of the NFC’s best stories, but the Rams bring a level of postseason experience that matters at this stage. Los Angeles has been efficient in the red zone and opportunistic defensively. While the Bears’ momentum is real, the Rams’ ability to adjust mid-game, particularly offensively, makes them the safer bet to advance. 

This season has also accelerated a league-wide shift: Rookies are contributing immediately and meaningfully. Houston’s rise has been inseparable from C.J. Stroud, who finished the regular season with over 4,000 passing yards and one of the lowest interception rates among playoff quarterbacks. In Chicago, Caleb Williams delivered his most efficient performance of the year in the Bears’ Wild Card win.

Overall, looking to Super Bowl LX, the Patriots remain one of the most structurally sound teams left, but they are not insulated from pressure. Houston’s speed, Buffalo’s volatility, and Denver’s defensive discipline all present legitimate obstacles, and none would qualify as an upset. This postseason does not belong to a dynasty or a breakout star. It belongs to teams capable of adapting in real time and in a bracket defined by equality, where grit may matter more than anything else. 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue