Latest News

Research Briefs, Science & Technology

Achieving alternate futures in the Anthropocene

Eleven thousand seven hundred years ago, Earth exited the last major geological epoch—the Ice Age—entering a period of relative warmth and stability, called the Holocene. Researchers, however, believe that the planet is ready for a new term: The ‘Anthropocene,’ denoting a time during which humans drive substantial change to our environment. 

A recent article, written by a team including Elena Bennett, professor in McGill’s Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and Steven Cork, adjunct professor in Australian National University’s School of Public Policy, explores the challenges that humanity faces as it tries to solve this new epoch’s problems. The Anthropocene is used to describe how humans are almost single-handedly responsible for inducing an environmental global shift. To counteract this widescale destruction, the researchers propose that imagination is a hopeful yet complicated tool for creating a positive environmental future.

“Humans are a dominant force on the planet and drive many planetary forces,” Bennett said in an interview with The Tribune

This enormous human impact represents what Bennett called a “complex footprint” with challenges including climate change, resource scarcity, declining food quality, and overpopulation.

These challenges have defined the last decade and will continue to worsen. While researchers across the globe realize this, many take a technological or political approach, developing novel machinery or approaches to public policy. Alternatively, Cork and Bennett’s research takes a cultural and psychological perspective, asking difficult questions about how we imagine ourselves and our species in relation to the environment, and to the future of the planet. 

According to Cork, our worldviews are stopping us from the kind of critical action that the climate crisis requires. 

“The first [problem] is that many people don’t understand the situation we’re in as a species,” Cork explained. 

He continued that if you ask a person about what they believe the future looks like, their answer is based on their “simple models” of the world—the easiest way they understand the world. For many, the complex relationship between humans and the environment seems too difficult to grasp.

“This lack of understanding is partly because most people don’t understand the complexities of the challenges that have arisen,” Cork said. 

Without fully understanding, it is impossible to mobilize a society to prepare for the future.

“The second aspect of how humans think that we focus on in our review is our limited ability to imagine,” Cork expanded. 

Ask anyone born over fifty years ago if they expected to live in the world of today, and it is likely that they never envisioned one in which artificial intelligence could diagnose illnesses, or 3D printers could generate three-dimensional objects. Cork described this as “black swan” thinking, a reference to Nassim Taleb’s book Black Swan. In the book, all swans were white and the concept of a black swan seemed impossible. People could not comprehend something they had not seen before. Cork related this to our inability to anticipate the future.

While creating a plan for the future may be difficult, Cork and Bennett argue humans must instigate change for a better relationship with our planet, requiring new ways of relating to one another and imagining. 

“We must think radically yet realistically about the future and stimulate their imagination about possible futures,” Cork elaborated.

To work toward this goal, Bennett described three significant steps to start reimagining the future. The first is to “inspire people,” by opening up conversations about what we want and need to achieve for a positive future. The second is to “encourage a plurality of different visions” that account for the ways that humans synthesize their profoundly nuanced views of a new world. The last goal is to scenario-build by exploring various potential futures to examine which would be most successful. 

This is no easy task, but Cork, Bennett, and their team are working hard to show what needs to be done. A good place to start, as Bennett says, is to ask ourselves what are the places we can imagine ourselves in and look for our positive goals.

McGill, News, SSMU

Committee seats on the docket at SSMU Legislative Council Meeting

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) called to order its second Legislative Council meeting of the academic year on Sept. 28. Most discussion items fell into one of two categories: Beginning-of-fall housekeeping and nominations to the Legislative Council’s various committees

The meeting commenced with Summer Reports from McGill’s Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) and Arts Undergraduate Society, followed by individual Summer Reports from each SSMU Executive. Vice President (VP) University Affairs Lalia Katchelewa discussed various Indigenous-support initiatives that she has been collaborating on with VP External Affairs Liam Gaither and Indigenous Affairs Commissioner Jocelyne Couture, particularly in light of McGill’s controversial New Vic Project. These include advocacy on behalf of the Mohawk Mothers to the McGill Administration and the “Critical Campus Tour,” which took place on Sept. 29 as part of the 5th annual Skátne Entewathahíta/We Will Walk Together Event.

“[It is] a tour of stories of McGill that have not been told in the past […] on Indigenous affairs or what was happening at McGill before McGill was there, on the land that belongs to the University,” Katchelewa explained.

After a brief presentation from McGill’s Sustainability Projects Fund (SPF), the meeting launched into a Question Period dominated by debate on whether opinions in SSMU Statements should be attributed to “SSMU” or “SSMU Executives.” The discussion analyzed the Executive Committee’s recent declaration of support, which included the line, “The SSMU strongly supports the work of queer and trans activists [against the 1 Million March 4 Children].” SUS Representative Joshua Gerstvolf raised a concern that the wording implies that the sentence reflects the views of all SSMU members, not just the Executives.

“There’s a lot of misinterpretation [of the line] among the students—when they read ‘SSMU,’ they’re including all members of SSMU,” Gerstvolf argued.

VP Student Life Nadia Dakdouki countered that the phrase falls under SSMU’s Positions Book, which stresses SSMU representatives’ obligation to support “marginalized persons.” However, Dakdouki also acknowledged the potential confusion over authorship.

“We’ll make sure that there is an actual signature saying ‘The SSMU Executive Committee’ [at the end of Statements] […] we’ll take that feedback and make that clarification,” Dakdouki resolved.

After a brief recess, the Council returned for the meeting’s business proper. The old business—the readoption of the meeting’s rules for the oncoming year—passed with minimal edits. The two pieces of new business composed the meeting’s final hour. 

First was the allocation of committees to Councillors, who all must sit on at least one. While the process initially progressed quickly, with Councillors nominating themselves for seats and some even facing competition, it soon decelerated to a repeated process of calling on those who had not self-nominated and asking them to choose a committee or be chosen for one. Eventually, each Councillor possessed at least one committee seat, though many seats were left unfilled as not all Councillors took on additional allocations.

The second piece, the nomination of Councillors to the Board of Directors, proved slower going. All Councillors hesitated to nominate themselves, despite alternating attempts by the Executives to spotlight the importance of the role and remind the members of their responsibility to take it. At Dakdouki’s recommendation, Deputy Speaker Sierra Fallis called upon each Council member individually to explain their refusal; most pointed to a lack of time for the position. Half an hour into the debate, only one of the four spots had been filled, by Law Representative Jacob Shannon. Fallis adjourned the meeting after other Councillors successfully passed motions to approve the piece of business as-is and return to the issue at the next meeting. 

Moment of the Meeting:

SUS Representative Sofie Fournier’s question on the use of “SSMU supports” in the Statement sparked a deeper discussion of SSMU’s advocational positions and voice.

Soundbite:

“In terms of democracy and being able to run SSMU properly, we need representation on the Board of Directors, and last year, Council did do a lock-in […] until people had been nominated to the Board of Directors. And so that is also an option [for this meeting].” – Dakdouki, following reluctance from Councillors to nominate themselves

Baseball, Sports

Can the Toronto Blue Jays make a deep postseason run?

With 162 games in total, the Major League Baseball (MLB) season can seem draining to some fans. From May to September, the games can feel quite meaningless, with fans just waiting for October to roll around and for the playoffs to finally begin. 

For Toronto Blue Jays fans, this postseason brings an opportunity to avenge the failure of last year’s wildcard series against the Seattle Mariners. With the Jays claiming the third wildcard spot on Sept. 30, the team is poised to face off against the Minnesota Twins. However, with the team underperforming all season long, many fans are left asking: Do the Jays have the legs to make a deep postseason run? The Tribune explores arguments both for and against the possibility. 

For: A September surge

The Jays showed a glimmer of what they are capable of when they are at their best when outfielder George Springer slid head-first into home base to cap-off an inside-the-park home run on Sept. 24 against their American League (AL) East rival––the Tampa Bay Rays. The Jays’ Achilles heel this season has been a struggling offence and a lack of timely hitting, but September has shown some promise of overcoming their weakness that can hopefully carry into the postseason. Despite a flailing series against the New York Yankees, where they lost two out of three games, the Jays have scored 45 runs in their past six games against the Rays. A struggling Vladimir Guerrero Jr. boasts a .300/.407/1.047 slashline with five home runs and ten RBIs over the past two weeks.Moreover, contributions from Cavan Biggio, Daulton Varsho and a resurgence of power from Matt Chapman may give the Jays the much needed offensive boost they need in the postseason. 

Against: Bad record against teams in the AL East 

Playing in the hardest division in baseball is tough and the Jays have proven just that. Their measly record of 21–31 against AL East opponents makes it hard to see how the Jays would come out on top in a series against the Rays, let alone a fight for the division title against the division-leading Baltimore Orioles. Moreover, their record of 42–49 against teams with a record above .500 does not bode well for the sharper competition they will face come playoff time. 

Against: Bad baserunning

Baserunning may seem like a micro-issue, however, with the new rules leading stolen bases to jump from 2,486 in 2022 to over 3,000 in 2023, its value cannot be underestimated. Not only are the Jays tied for last in total stolen bases league-wide with 99, but poor baserunning decisions have been commonplace all season long. The Jays rank 29th in stolen base percentage (stolen bases plus caught stealing divided by stolen bases), and fifth in outs on base (when a runner is put out while making a baserunning play). All to say, the Jays baserunning is one of their greatest flaws, and will surely haunt them in the playoffs.  

For: Veteran presence

Vet presence often turns out to be one of the biggest x-factors in the MLB postseason, and if the Jays want any chance of a deep run, they will have to capitalize on this advantage.The Blue Jays have a handful of veterans that can lead the team to victory. Springer, a World Series champion and World Series Most Valuable Player in 2017, has played 65 playoff games with the Houston Astros. Brandon Belt, a bright spot on a struggling Jays team, played in 35 playoff games with the San Francisco Giants and won two World Series’ in 2012 and 2014. Hyun Jin Ryu has also appeared in nine playoff games. Safe to say, playoff experience is not an issue on this Jays roster. 

Bonus For: Pitching staff 

The Jays have one of the strongest pitching staffs in all of baseball. They have the fourth lowest team era (3.78), to complement a third overall era of 3.85 amongst their starting pitchers. The staff also boasts the third highest strikeouts per nine innings (9.47) and are in the top half of the league for almost every other pitching metric. 

McGill, News

‘I’ll be thinking about this all my life’: Students react to asbestos exposure at McGill

Students at McGill’s Macdonald campus cite feeling frightened, isolated, and frustrated following the release of a report detailing the events that led to the asbestos-related closures of three buildings on the Macdonald campus in Winter 2023. The Internal Audit Final Report, which was released on Sept. 18, shows that Quebec regulators intervened on the Macdonald campus three times between 2021 and 2023, deeming that McGill was not properly following asbestos protocols. 

For some, such as Hiba Kamel, a third-year Ph.D. student in the Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, the administration has broken the trust between herself and the institution. 

“I don’t think they care,” Kamel said in an interview with The Tribune. “And I don’t trust that it won’t happen again.”

According to the Final Report, the Raymond Building Phytorium, which contains growth chambers used by multiple plant scientists, was a site of concern for asbestos. In October 2022, the Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité au travail—the body Quebec has entrusted to oversee workplace health and safety—intervened specifically in that area. 

Kamel, a researcher in the Plant Science department, often used the growth chambers as a part of her research and recounted seeing and interacting with dust for months. Test results reported on March 14, 2023, revealed that 20 per cent of dust samples from the Raymond building tested positive for asbestos. 

As a mother, Kamel told The Tribune that she is scared she may have brought particles home on her clothing and exposed her young daughter. She fears that she may feel the effects of asbestos exposure in decades to come. 

Exposure to asbestos can lead to conditions like asbestosis, a chronic lung disease, and mesothelioma, a type of cancer. It can take anywhere from 10 to 40 years for the effects of asbestos exposure to surface. 

“When I realized that it was asbestos and I looked it up […] it was horrible. And it’s the kind of horrible that spoils your mood, and you can’t come out of it,” Kamel said. “And sometimes you’ll forget about it for a second. And then you have that horrible feeling in your chest. And you’re like, ‘Why is it that I’m having this feeling? Oh yeah, because I might get cancer in 30 years.’”

For others, the goal is to move on from the situation and focus on the positive—the return to in-person instruction following asbestos-related closures last year. 

“There was a little bit of nervousness in the air [when the report came out], knowing that you could have a repeat semester or a repeat year potentially [because] of what happened was kind of disheartening,” Annie Obnowlenny, U2 Science, told The Tribune. “But there’s no point in [expecting] the worst when you don’t even know if the worst will happen [….] A lot of my friends and I are just trying to get through the semester and have fun and do well.”

The Macdonald Campus Students’ Society has been working to provide students with support—including opening The Ceilidh as an additional study space and hosting town halls—since last winter’s closures. In a statement to The Tribune, Vice President (VP) Communications Blake Callan and VP University Affairs Vaishnavi Parey expressed that students on the Macdonald campus feel they should be compensated for the loss of class and lab time last winter.

“They did not try to move us to different classrooms, or give us any compensation for our loss of lab and lecture experience,” Callan and Parey wrote. “We are only here for a short amount of time and the false information about the duration of construction and health issues arising from being there is disappointing to say the least.”

McGill Media Relations Officer Frédérique Mazerolle told The Tribune that staff at the Student Wellness Hub and Keep.MeSAFE have been advised that students affected by asbestos may need support and are “ready to assist.”

In an email to The Tribune, Kamel expressed that she is unsure how many other people are concerned about exposure to asbestos, and feels isolated in her worries.

“I can’t for the life of me be the only one who feels that way. I can’t think that I’m the only person who’s actually scared for their life, and who’s gonna need significant support throughout,” Kamel said in an interview with The Tribune. “I’ll be thinking about this all my life.”

Science & Technology

Science in the city: ALL IN 2023 unveils future of AI in Montreal

On Sept. 27 and 28, Montreal hosted ALL IN 2023, a conference bringing together industry specialists and cutting-edge researchers in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) at the Palais des Congrès de Montréal. Experts gave speeches and participated in panels on a wide variety of topics, including AI’s impact on creative innovations and the workforce. To reflect Montreal’s bilingualism, the event was hosted in a combination of English and French with live translation provided via headset. 

Conference opening

The event kicked off at 8:30 a.m. on Sept. 27. After a brief opening by Hélène Desmarais, co-founder and chair of the Montreal-based AI company IVADO Labs, Montreal mayor Valérie Plante took the stage. She began with a land acknowledgement and then transitioned into welcoming attendees to Montreal, pitching the city as an international hub of AI innovation. 

“You’ve chosen the economic and cultural metropolis of Montreal as the perfect place to move the boundaries of your knowledge,” Plante said. 

She also emphasized the urgency of finding ethical ways to develop AI technologies, calling it “one of the biggest tests of our time.”

Pierre Fitzgibbon, the Minister of Economy, Innovation, and Energy for Quebec, spoke next, highlighting the investments that the provincial government has made into AI research. He underscored the Quebec strategy to support research and investment in innovation as well as the government’s funding of organizations like NextAI, which help finance and accelerate AI start-ups.

New McGill Graduate Programs

Carola Weil, Dean of Continuing Studies at McGill University, and John Gradek, a faculty lecturer in aviation management, announced two new graduate programs on the afternoon of the 27th. McGill will now offer graduate certificates in Dynamic Supply Networks and Integrated Supply Networks, both of which use AI to analyze modern supply management. 

These programs are not master’s degrees, but rather 15-credit certificates offered by the School of Continuing Studies with the intention of supporting professionals in developing skills working with AI in the private sector. They are part of the School’s ongoing push to offer modern and relevant certifications in a variety of areas, such as financial technology and data analysis.

How can AI help artists?

The conference continued with a panel of three experts who have each incorporated AI into their creative processes. The first was Julia Kastner, Chief Marketing and Business Development Officer at Hitlab, a company that uses machine learning to gauge how successful a given song will be in different music charts. While Hitlab does not use AI to generate music, the company does attempt to integrate it into the process of discovering and popularizing hit music. 

The next speaker was Céline Mornet, the Interactive Team Lead at the Montreal-based public art installation company Moment Factory. Moment Factory has created artwork displayed in Montreal and across the globe and is the team behind the nightly light display on the Jacques Cartier Bridge. Many of their exhibits incorporate interactive components and AI software, with the bridge, for example, using the traffic and weather patterns of the day to create a unique display each night. 

Sandra Rodriguez, an independent creative director and a faculty lecturer at MIT, presented her work on the Chom5ky vs. Chomsky project. An immersive virtual reality experience, the program allows users to speak with a simulated version of Noam Chomsky, renowned linguist and noted critic of AI models such as ChatGPT. 

What does the future of work look like?

Returning to the industry side of the conference, several speakers shared their perspectives on the role of AI in the changing employment landscape and the responsibilities that governments, corporations, and individuals have in these unfamiliar circumstances. 

Lucia Velasco, a Spanish economist at the European University Institute, emphasized that the lack of accurate information about ever-changing economies and workplaces constitutes a major issue that governments must grapple with. 

“We’re facing a significant gap in our understanding of what is happening,” Velasco said. “And by this, I mean that most countries lack a systematic approach within their official statistics and [way of] tracking how automation is impacting tasks and therefore jobs.”

Basheerhamad Shadrach, Director of the Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia, added that even when governments are collecting accurate statistics, the data focuses on formal workers, especially those engaged in skilled or industrial labour. 

“There’s absolutely no sense of what’s happening in the informal sector, […] when it comes to landless labourers, to vegetable vendors, to street vendors, to people who actually live on subsistence income,” Shadrach said.

Overall, the speakers stressed that a certain degree of ‘AI literacy’ is critical for individuals as we face a future of work that will inevitably incorporate a large amount of AI support.

Julie Garneau, professor in the Department of Industrial Relations at the Université du Québec en Outaouais, highlighted the urgency of education in this area. 

“90 per cent of the world are users of AI. Somehow or another, we are impacted in our daily life by all these AI tools and technologies, and we should be aware,” Garneau said. “So we need to actually bring in that AI literacy component very early in our lives.”

What types of regulation do we need?

No conference about AI is complete without a thorough discussion of government regulation. One of the afternoon panels on Sept. 28 brought together a selection of experts to give their perspectives on what role the government can or should play in regulating AI models. 

Duncan Cass-Beggs, Global AI Risk Initiative’s executive director, noted that when it comes to AI, a truly far-reaching approach is needed and that effective regulation must work at the scale of international law. 

“You could imagine a scenario where a splinter group from a frontier lab says, ‘well, we don’t like your regulations. We’re going to go and relocate somewhere that’s got a lot of cheap energy and low regulations,’” Cass-Beggs said. “There needs to be a bit of an international principle that no state is allowed to harbor actors that are developing something that potentially could harm all of humanity.”

They also discussed the difficulties that arise when trying to regulate something that changes as quickly as AI.

“We [policy makers] are feeling overwhelmed because literally the things that we’re seeing announced this week are capabilities that would have seemed like science fiction six months ago,” said Cass-Beggs. 

McGill, News

‘United we bargain, divided we beg’: AGSEM begins negotiations with McGill

The Association of Graduate Students Employed at McGill (AGSEM) commenced a series of bargaining sessions with the McGill administration on Sept. 21. AGSEM’s collective agreement with the university expired on July 31, 2023. Since then, the union has been negotiating a new collective agreement and is demanding several changes be made in their contract regarding wages, procedures for preventing sexual harassment, and health care. An hour before AGSEM and McGill’s meeting started, around thirty AGSEM members rallied outside of the meeting room in Sherbrooke 680-688, sporting bright red shirts with the slogan “United we bargain, Divided we beg” printed on the back.

Prior to the start of the negotiation process, AGSEM started their “No More Free Hours” campaign, which claims that McGill steals one million dollars in TA wages every year. Throughout negotiations, the union will meet with McGill representatives privately to come to terms about a new collective agreement that both parties deem suitable before TAs sign their new work contract. 

According to the union’s recount of the session in its newsletter, the McGill administration was represented by a labour relations advisor and other individuals across departments—such as professors and administrative and human resources staff members. This group included an Associate Professor in Anatomy and Cell Biology, an Administrative Officer in Bioengineering, a Human Resources Advisor, an Administration Manager in Mathematics and Statistics, an Associate Professor in Computer Science, and a Program Administrator in the School of Continuing Studies

On the other side of the table, AGSEM’s team included the union’s bargaining committee, consisting of three individuals who were selected through a vote by AGSEM members: third-year Physics Ph.D. candidate Nick Vieira, second-year Biology Ph.D. candidate Nada El Baba, and Philosophy Ph.D. candidate Dallas Jokic. AGSEM president Mario Roy and TA Grievance Officer Jean-Philip Mathieu were also present.

In an email to The Tribune, Vieira expressed that in light of increasing price inflation, TAs need better monetary compensation for their work more than ever.

“In the context of record inflation, food insecurity, not enough paid hours to do our job well, and McGill stealing a million dollars in wages from TAs every year, TAs are working to fix our broken contract,” Vieira said.  “We’re ready to negotiate the contract that TAs deserve.” 

Vieira added that it is in the union’s interest to allow its members to be directly involved in the negotiation process. 

“For these negotiations, the union is pursuing a strategy of maximizing the democracy of negotiations and ensuring that all workers can be involved in bargaining, from start to finish,” Vieira wrote. “Throughout negotiations, the bargaining team will call on the expertise of workers and their knowledge of working conditions at McGill.”

AGSEM’s negotiation and grievance advisor Sébastien Boisvert, who is also a member of the Fédération nationale des enseignantes et des enseignants du Québec (FNEEQ), attended the meeting. As AGSEM’s affiliate union, FNEEQ offers legal, tactical, and political support to the organization. The Tribune spoke to Christine Gauthier, Vice President of the FNEEQ and manager of the university group, who explained the general process of union-university negotiations. 

She stated that the first step is for the union to determine a negotiation mandate containing a list of demands decided by its members. The employer will typically receive the mandate at the beginning of the series of meetings.

“Then, the second stage is the longest and it concerns the negotiation process itself,” Gauthier said. “There may be moments of varying intensity, depending on the state of the discussions at the negotiating table. One thing is certain, union negotiators must be able to agree on an employment contract that is interesting and satisfactory for workers.”

The last stage of the bargaining process is the adoption of the newly established conditions by the members of the union if they are deemed acceptable.

The Tribune spoke to Jesse*, a Ph.D. candidate in the Faculty of Arts, about TAs’ working conditions. Jesse has worked as a TA for two courses since 2021, and described working as a TA as time-consuming. Before coming to McGill, they had teaching experience at another university, where TAs were responsible for smaller numbers of students.

“At McGill, I’ve had a hundred students, so the workload is massive. It’s much much much higher than I had ever experienced previously,” Jesse said.

Jesse believes that the reality of being a TA at McGill is working more than the number of hours agreed upon in their contract. On top of doing their coursework as graduate students, TAs with large groups of students need to spend an enormous amount of time grading, answering emails, and hosting office hours. In the end, Jesse feels that the quality of their research and of their teaching take the toll of being overworked. Furthermore, they explained that because of power dynamics between Ph.D. students and professors, TAs have difficulty speaking out about their overwhelming workload.

“We are—especially Ph.D. [students]—super reliant on our supervisors and on our departments,” Jesse said. “If we mess up, if we make someone upset, our careers are over because we really really rely on those connections […] for funding, for research assistantships, for letters of recommendation. So, if I go over my hour agreement, it’s really tough for me to tell the professor I’m working for.” 

Jesse echoed Nick’s worries about increases in the cost of living, saying that they believe a priority of these negotiations should be to increase wages.

“All the Ph.D. students I know are living below the poverty line in Canada,” Jesse told The Tribune.

One of the biggest drawbacks of this extra, out-of-contract work, Jesse finds, is that they are not able to get to know their students.

“What I don’t like about [the workload] is that I don’t get to know my students, I can barely learn their names,” Jesse said. “And I love teaching, I love getting to know my students, I love working with them, I love helping them improve […] and you can’t do that when you’re working with a hundred students.”

The Tribune asked the university for a statement about its first bargaining meeting with AGSEM. In response, McGill Media Relations Officer Frédérique Mazerolle wrote, “The TA collective agreement expired on July 31, 2023. McGill will not make any comments regarding the current discussions and will let the negotiation process run its course.”

*Jesse’s name has been changed to preserve their confidentiality.

A previous version of this article stated that the slogan “United we bargain, Divided we beg” was printed on the front and back of AGSEM members’ shirts. In fact, the slogan was only printed on the back of their shirts. It also stated that AGSEM brought up the effects of increasing price inflation on TAs during the bargaining meeting with McGill. In fact, they did not. The Tribune regrets these errors.

Features

From Alpha to Zeta: Investigating the dark side of Greek life

The good, the bad, and the ugly of McGill’s fraternities and sororities

Content Warning: Mentions of suicide, sexual assault, eating disorders, racism, antisemitism, homophobia, and xenophobia

McGill boasts a reputation as an independent university, where no one holds students’ hands. Imagine if you were in a collaborative community with similar values, missions, and visions for the future of the campus and the world. Is that community Greek life?

Since the creation of McGill’s first fraternity in 1883 and the first sorority in 1886, Greek life has become a prominent aspect ​​of student life at the university. From vibrant house parties to cancer research fundraisers, Greek life organizations offer a wide range of activities to cater to their members and the broader student body. 

Greek life at McGill comprises seven fraternities and five sororities, totalling some 500 members—or 2 per cent of the undergraduate student population. McGill’s sororities are governed by the Panhellenic Council (Panhel), though the fraternities do not have an equivalent governing body. These fraternities and sororities are united by the Inter-Greek Letter Council (IGLC), which aims to “[bring] together students of leadership, friendship, and scholarship, who are continuously active on campus and in the greater Montreal community.” 

Unlike the IGLC, the McGill administration has no relationship with Greek life. By contrast, other universities, like the University of British Columbia, have documents outlining the relationship between the university and Greek organizations on campus.

In recent years, students and activists alike have criticized Greek life for its discriminatory recruitment, hazing, and sexual violence. This has led to the Abolish Greek Life Movement, which argues that Greek life must be discontinued due to its roots in an outdated system of racism and misogyny.

To investigate the current state of Greek life at McGill and the effects of the Abolish Greek Life Movement on the community, The Tribune conducted interviews with current and former members. During this investigation, The Tribune verified that source allegations were known to other members through internal communication, and also interviewed policy stakeholders. 

The Tribune can reveal that Greek life still provides many with a sense of community and feelings of acceptance. However, others have reported negative experiences, including racist comments and difficulties speaking out over sexual violence. 

Issues with Greek Life at McGill

Sam* joined a sorority in their first year. What began through the pursuit of friendship and community left them with memories of bullying and a mental health crisis. 

“Being in [the organization] was affecting my mental health to the point where I was experiencing extreme suicidal ideations,” Sam said in an interview with The Tribune. “I had no choice but to leave.”

During their time, Sam said that they were the survivor of a sexual assault at a fraternity party, perpetrated by another McGill student who was not a Greek life member. Sam was extremely disappointed in IGLC’s lack of action following the incident.

Sam asked that IGLC blacklist the student who assaulted them so that they would be banned from all future Greek life events. However, an IGLC member informed Sam that they were unable to blacklist him without further testimonies, confirmed by messages between Sam and an IGLC executive seen by The Tribune. As a result, Sam had to reach out to every Greek organization on campus to ask them to blacklist the perpetrator, with most choosing to do so. 

When Sam mentioned the sexual assault to members of their Greek organization in a group chat, instead of supporting them after the assault, the sisters were upset that Sam had not included a trigger warning prior to mentioning the incident. The messages about content warnings amassed numerous likes from sisters, while Sam’s message received none.

The IGLC did not respond to The Tribune’s request for comment before the publication deadline. 

When Sam was in the Greek life community, they also attended numerous parties and fundraiser events that they felt created an uncomfortable environment. One event auctioned off members of their organization under the guise of philanthropy—a practice rooted in Trans-Atlantic slavery.  

“[My organization] decided that it would be a great idea to have a website where sisters are bidded on to go on dates that match [the first letter of] their name,” Sam said. “Anyone could bid and you would have to go on the date.”

Sam is a person of colour. They said they experienced racist comments during their time in the organization, which led them to feel excluded from the rest of the largely white Greek community.

As a result, Sam ultimately left their organization in their second year. 

Alex*, a former member of a McGill fraternity, had a largely positive experience in Greek life. However, they saw first-hand some of its downsides, such as instances of sexual violence occurring at Greek events. 

“I had to deal with sexual violence and harassment within my fraternity. Luckily, I was also in SACOMSS [The Sexual Assault Centre of the McGill Students’ Society] for a while and was able to apply that training, which ended up being life-saving,” Alex said. 

Alex joined Greek life as a first-year McGill student hoping to expand their social network. During their time in the Greek community, Alex served in a management position in their fraternity. 

Alex points out that due to McGill fraternities’ lack of a governing body, there is no McGill-specific policy for dealing with sexual assault and harassment. Instead, the school’s fraternities follow an international headquarters’ policies.

“We are attached to a headquarters in the U.S. that puts a lot of stringencies on us,” Alex said in an interview with The Tribune.

All of McGill’s Greek organizations are governed by an international headquarters, primarily based out of the U.S. These headquarters are responsible for determining the organizations’ internal policies, such as their code of conduct and policies regarding issues such as sexual violence. 

Even when such policies are outlined, instances of reported violence occur in fraternity rituals, such as hazing. 

“There’s hazing in fraternities. […] We really tried to cut it down. Where my fraternity is now, I wouldn’t call our rituals hazing,” Alex said. 

Sam also believes that many initiation rituals, particularly in fraternities, border on hazing and create an uncomfortable environment for prospective members. 

During their time in Greek life, Alex felt that the contracts eager first-year students were asked to sign were overly coercive, and they later observed how these documents made these students feel trapped in the organization.  

Potential members sign Greek life contracts following the recruitment process, where students get to know members of different Greek organizations. Then, through a process of mutual selection, members are assigned to an organization and sign their contracts, which keep them financially obligated to their organization for four years.

“The thing you don’t realize when you’re 18 and you’re just coming in, is it’s a financial commitment and it’s a legal commitment,” Alex said. “You’ve signed contracts and you’re locked in for those four years and it can be a real mess [to get out of them].”

Finding a sense of community

Despite the issues surrounding Greek life, many students continue to rush in the hopes of meeting friends and making a positive impact on their communities.

Jenna Dube, BA ’23, was in Greek life from 2020-2023. In their time, Dube served as VP of Community Relations and Panhellenic Delegate. Dube initially joined a sorority to find a sense of belonging during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“During that first COVID summer, I was feeling pretty isolated and I became interested in doing something I had never considered doing before,” Dube explained in an interview with The Tribune.

For Dube, partaking in Greek life was a great way to form social connections with other McGill students at a time when classes were largely online. 

“My closest friends are from my sorority and I made connections with people I never would have met otherwise,” they said. “I feel like I made an impact on the greater McGill and Montreal community through being in a sorority.”

Similarly, Robin*, a current McGill student, joined a fraternity in 2021 to expand their social network and create positive change in the community.

“Being in a fraternity really added to my life,” Robin said in an interview with The Tribune. “I got to plan really fun events, I raised a bunch of money for [a native women’s shelter and a wildlife conservation club], and I met some really important people in my life.”

However, Robin recognizes that joining Greek life is not possible for everyone given financial and time restrictions, as well as institutionalized racism. 

“Systematically, there are quite a few barriers to Greek life,” Robin explained. “You have to have a decent amount of disposable income [and time] to participate fully. There are also historical issues with marginalized communities; the population of [Greek] organizations are not wholly representative of McGill.”

Part of this comes from the gendered divide and the assumptions of normative femininity and masculinity these groups can foment. As a queer and non-binary person, Dube was initially unsure about fitting into Greek life at McGill but was met with open arms by their sorority.

“My sorority was nothing but accepting and supportive of me and never asked me to be something I wasn’t,” Dube said.

The Start of a New Chapter

Dube believes that their sorority is doing significant work to address issues of discrimination and harassment through regular workshops.

“My sorority has always been on top of [diversity, equity, and inclusion],” Dube said. “We always had workshops about [combatting] racism and antisemitism, but also eating disorders and sexual violence.”

However, Dube does not feel that their sorority’s sense of accountability is present in all McGill fraternities, largely due to their lack of a governing body.

“I think the [fraternities] could make more steps to unify under one organization like Panhel and that would hopefully [increase accountability] and prevent DEI and sexual violence issues,” they suggested. 

For Robin, changing the protective nature of Greek organizations is key to preventing sexual violence.

“Once you’re in [a Greek organization], it’s a right, not a privilege to be in there,” they explained. “A lot of people try to defend the behaviour of their friends and [they] can use internal organizations’ policies to protect people. If anyone is making anyone in the community feel bad, […] we don’t need to have this person in [the organization].” 

Sophia Garofalo, U2 Arts, is a current member of a McGill sorority and an Arts Senator for the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU). In her role as an Arts Senator, she is working on creating policies and procedures to govern the relationship between SSMU and Greek life organizations on campus—a relationship that is not currently outlined by any official documentation. 

“Right now, I’m working with the heads of IGLC to create an independent agreement where they can access some resources from SSMU to better themselves, their understanding, and their preventative abilities [for sexual violence],” Garofalo explained. 

The new agreement between the IGLC and SSMU, which is currently being finalized, will allow the IGLC’s equity committee to reach out to SSMU for help with investigations. It will also include stricter requirements on sexual violence and harm reduction training for McGill’s Greek organizations, including a mandate that all McGill fraternities have at least 50 per cent of their members, including new members, the VP Social, VP Risk, VP External, and President attend a 2-hour active bystander sexual violence prevention workshop every semester. Should a fraternity not comply, the IGLC will prevent its members from participating in social events. 

However, such an agreement would not include the university itself, which has traditionally taken a hands-off approach with Greek organizations.

“McGill does not have an agreement with any Greek-letter organization and is not in any discussions for such an agreement or a three-way agreement with SSMU […] because they are entirely independent [of] McGill,” McGill Media Relations Officer Frédérique Mazerolle wrote in an email to The Tribune.

Despite previous instances of sexual harassment and assault in McGill’s Greek community, Garofalo is optimistic that with proper education and policies in place, these issues will no longer occur on our campus.

“There’s a bit more of a proactive attitude from IGLC, [and] the frats have been very receptive to that, which is really nice to se

e going forward,” she said. 

Alex echoes Garofalo’s hopeful sentiments but believes more work needs to be done to recuperate the needs for community on campus, without the roots of Greek life.

“I think Greek life has the potential to be a really beautiful and positive experience for university students,” Alex said. “[We] need to burn it down to the ground and start again.”

* Sam, Robin, and Alex’s names have been changed to preserve their confidentiality.

Editorial, Opinion

McGill must stand by the Mohawk Mothers

At the bottom of Mount-Royal lies the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH)––the site of an ongoing legal battle where McGill’s colonial past and the fight for truth and justice come to a head. On Sept. 12, McGill commenced drilling on the New Vic Project, aiming to “revitalize” the RVH in service of a new research facility, while purposefully neglecting the deeper implications of their project. According to the Kanien’kehá:ka Kahnistensera (Mohawk Mothers), the RVH site may contain human remains, specifically the remains of Indigenous children, from McGill’s violent involvement in the MK-Ultra experiments. The Mohawk Mothers appeared in the Superior Court of Quebec in April for a case management hearing regarding their settlement agreement with McGill, in which both parties agreed to search for potential unmarked Indigenous graves onsite. The settlement was the result of a years-long judicial struggle for justice that is nowhere near its end, as the Mothers will be returning to court on Oct. 27 to voice the multiple breaches McGill made to their settlement agreement. 

While McGill claims to “recognize and honour” Indigenous history, the university has repeatedly positioned itself against the Mohawk Mothers through settler colonial violence, using their power as an institution to ignore their demands. McGill has controlled the narrative around the legal battle, weaponized their privileged access to students and the McGill community by sending emails to students and staff that scarcely mention the discovery of human remains, and completely ignored both their multiple violations to the settlement agreement and the allegations of dishonesty made against them.

Time and time again, McGill has been unwilling to reconcile its atrocious history. The institution refuses to accept the crimes committed on unceded and stolen land, acknowledging bits and pieces on the surface, but never the whole truth. The New Vic project is striking proof of McGill’s greed and obsession with reputation over respect for the Haudenosaunee, Kanien’kehá:ka, and Anishinaabeg nations of this land.   

McGill’s refusal to acknowledge the blood on its hands, and active disinformation about the ongoing legal conflict with the Mohawk Mothers illustrates its bureaucratic approach to the matter. This procedure reveals the university’s willingness to further colonial pasts, as violent present and future. 

McGill’s denialism of the truth only adds to the atrocious acts perpetrated against the Mohawk Mothers. Overrun with semantics, the Frequently Asked Questions section of the New Vic site undermines the lawsuit’s severity and the ongoing findings at the RVH site. However, this is not the only place where the McGill administration has spread disinformation. In an announcement on Aug. 3, Provost and Vice-Principal (Academic) Christopher Manfredi claimed that only nine anomalies containing “grave-type” features were located during their archaeological investigation. However, the Mohawk Mothers claim that several other anomalies with ‘unknown’ features went unreported. 

The university continues to divert students’ attention away from the case and toward the bare minimum they have done to support McGill’s Indigenous community. They must account for a 1.7 billion CAD debt to the Six Nations of the Grand River to respect their right to self-determination and the university must show humility in their future  relationships with Indigenous peoples. The Mohawk Mothers have been clear in their assertion that the continuation of drilling may lead to the destruction of evidence. Time is running out and the time for community action is now. 

The student body’s weak response to the case reflects how McGill’s misleading narratives produce ignorance and complicity in their case against the Mohawk Mothers. It cannot fall solely on the Indigenous members of the McGill community to fight against the administration. Student organizations must echo the demands of the Mohawk Mothers, flooding the courtrooms on Oct. 27 and working in solidarity to show support. Non-Indigenous members of the McGill community must resist McGill’s attempts to pacify resistance and rise up against a colonial administration that attempts to silence and erase Indigenous peoples. The New Vic project cannot continue, and it is the responsibility of the student body to prevent it. 

Lacrosse, Sports

Redbirds Lacrosse suffers a tough loss against Trent Excalibur during their Pride game

Following Redbirds lacrosse’s first home game last weekend, an exciting 9-8 win over the Carleton Ravens (3–1), McGill (2–2) took the field against the daunting Trent Excalibur (4–1) on Sept. 23. 

Midfielder Dylan James explained how the Redbirds’ and Excalibur’s history against one another factors into their pregame approach. 

“We took [Trent] very seriously,” James told The Tribune. “We’re focused and dialled in, and very mindful of the fact that they’re a good team.” 

The Redbirds started the game off strong with midfielder Samuel MacDonald winning the opening faceoff and James giving McGill a 1-0 lead in the first minute of play with an assist from attacker and team captain Isaiah Cree. However, this advantage was short-lived as Trent tied the game six minutes in and scored again just two minutes later. The Excalibur continued to apply pressure, scoring yet another goal for a 3-1 lead. In the last minute of the first quarter, James scored his second of the game, bringing McGill back within one goal.  

With nine minutes left in the second quarter, Trent netted another goal, but two minutes later

midfielder Joshua Jewell scored with an assist from James. Midfielder Alexander Erbstein carried on the momentum, scoring another goal for McGill with five minutes left in the quarter, before Trent scored two more goals in the last minute of play, bringing the score up to 6-4 at the half. 

James scored once again at the top of the third quarter, closing the teams’ two-goal gap and bringing the score to 6-5. However, Trent quickly shut down McGill’s attempt at a comeback, scoring again to close out the third quarter 7-5.  

Cree explained that the biggest challenge they had was matching Trent’s speed. 

“They’re a fast team,” Cree remarked after the game. “I feel like once we match feet a little bit more and just play our game, we’ll be fine.” 

In the fourth quarter James had yet another assist on a goal by midfielder Rowan Birrell that upped the score to 7-6. With Trent scoring another goal, James fought hard to come back, receiving an assist from Birrell in the last few seconds of the eighth minute. Trent went on to score two more goals before midfielder John Miraglia secured the final goal for the Redbirds. Trent ultimately won 10-8. 

Moving forward, James believes that the key to success rests in being more disciplined and making fewer mental errors.  

“We have it in us and we know we have it in us,” said James. “Going into the game we knew that we could push more. It was just a lack of execution from that regard.” 

Despite the difficult loss, head coach Nicolas Soubry was proud of the team’s offensive performance. 

“I thought our offence played the best they’ve played all year,” Soubry told The Tribune. “It was one of those days where you’re just like, they could do whatever they want on defence, we’re going to score goals, so we just had to work better at getting them those opportunities.”

The Redbirds will play next against the Queen’s University’s Gaels (2–1) on Sept. 30, for the Legacy Game.

Moment of the game: Despite being down by three, Miraglia stayed motivated, scoring the final goal of the game with just under two minutes remaining to make the final 10-8 and give the Redbirds momentum heading into their next matchup. 

Quotable: 

“We have grit, we aren’t going to give up. We went down for a few getting close to the end and we still put one [goal]  in ready to close with two minutes left so it shows that we will fight to the end no matter what. I feel like that’s what’s most important. We’re not going to turn over and let this game get out of hand. We will always fight.”

– Attacker, Isaiah Cree
Stat Corner: Midfielder and faceoff specialist Samuel MacDonald won every single faceoff of the game.

Know Your Athlete, Sports

Know Your Athlete: Jonas Press

The story of how Redbirds baseball’s Jonas Press landed at McGill is all too relatable for many high school athletes who graduated in 2020 or 2021: COVID-19 derailed his dreams of heading down south to play Division I baseball. However, this unexpected twist has still resulted in a rewarding experience for Press. 

“The friends that I’ve met through the baseball team are my best friends here and I love them from the bottom of my heart,” Press said in an interview with The Tribune. “I think we could all agree as a class, as a whole, that we’ve made lifelong friends.”  

With his dad, uncle, brother, and cousin all playing the sport, baseball was inevitable for Press.

“I’m the oldest son […] so you could say I started it and then everyone kind of followed,” Press joked. “I started when I was five. My dad loved it and then I grew to love it too.”

Growing up in Toronto, Press began his baseball career with the North York Blues, then moving to the Brampton Royals where he won the Baseball Canada 13U and 15U national tournaments. At 16, Press moved to the Ontario Blue Jays––a team that plays in the Canada Premier Baseball League, Ontario youth baseball’s highest level.

“My goals as a kid were like; I want to be in the MLB, I want to go play for the Blue Jays,” Press confessed. “I was always pretty good so I thought I had a chance and maybe not to make it to the pros, but […] to at least go Division I down in the States. My goal was never to stay in Canada.”

However, as Press entered his final year of high school in the fall of 2020, COVID-19 prevented him from taking part in his team’s fall trip––a vital aspect of the National Collegiate Athletics Association’s (NCAA) recruiting process. As the team planned to visit a collection of southern-U.S. NCAA schools as their few COVID-19 restrictions allowed them to continue playing throughout the pandemic, Press decided that the risk of exposure while travelling would be too great. So, he elected to stay in Canada and attend McGill after graduation.

A few months before he arrived, McGill’s Athletics department announced that the 2021-22 baseball season would be cancelled entirely. At this point, Press considered taking a gap year to evaluate his options, but ultimately, he decided to come straight to McGill. 

Despite the lack of support from the university, Casey Auerbach, the team’s coach at the time, was able to organize games for the team against CÉGEPs and other universities without being affiliated with McGill. 

As the 2022-23 baseball season got underway, Press explained that the schedule wasn’t exactly what he had expected. 

“If you look at schedules pre-COVID […] they had 40 games, they had trainers with them, they got to play against [Ontario University Athletics] teams, they had at least six or seven games in the U.S.,” Press explained. “That just hasn’t happened for us.” 

Despite the disappointment and the desire to play more games against better competition, Press believes that the team’s addition to the Réseau du Sport Étudiant du Québec (RSEQ) will aid the long-term development and stability of the team moving forward. 

“We’ve realized it’s gonna be really tough to have change for when we’re here, so we’re working for the guys in the future to make sure this team is still running and doesn’t get shut down,” Press said. 

Like his teammates, Press has worked incredibly hard for McGill’s baseball program and has plenty to show for it: He leads the Redbirds in runs-batted-in and boasts a .408 batting average. This success may be due in part to his pre-game routine, which involves listening to a lot of Kendrick Lamar and putting on his gear in the same order every time. 

For the remainder of the season, Press hopes the Redbirds will continue to compete at a high level and, hopefully, win the RSEQ championship. 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue