Latest News

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

‘Adolescence’ swept the Emmys and made history

The 77th annual Emmy Awards had its usual share of glamour and viral moments, from stunning red carpet looks to controversial money countdowns. But the most memorable of all were the eight Emmys awarded to the Netflix limited series, Adolescence.

Adolescence is a reflection on how life for today’s youth has changed since the  COVID-19 pandemic. Consisting of four episodes all taken in one shot, the show focuses on a 13-year-old boy named Jamie (Owen Cooper) who is arrested as a suspect for the murder of his classmate. The show dives into several topics, including increased knife violence in the U.K. and how misogynistic content impacts the behaviour of young boys on the internet. The show discusses Jamie’s beliefs about women, originating from this misogynistic Red Pill content

The use of consecutive one-shot episodes throughout the mini-series immerses the audience in this boy’s mindset. When Jamie’s underlying issues of self-loathing are revealed, he abruptly switches from acting scared to angry and manipulative. With the audience still unsure of Jamie’s innocence, Cooper is able to create sympathy for his character. Acting in a single take requires perfect memorization of lines without making mistakes for an entire hour, a testament to his strong acting skills. 

Cooper won an Emmy for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Limited Series, making history as the youngest man to win at just 15 years old. Many TV series cast adult actors as teenagers, resulting in a lack of authentic teenage representation. Cooper’s performance as Jamie takes a realistic look at the mindsets of teenage boys with unlimited internet access. Many teens were left on their own during the pandemic, and online media usage dramatically increased. Because Owen Cooper was also a young boy during the pandemic, he can relate to this online childhood culture unlike an older actor. 

The series writer and co-editor Stephen Graham wanted to cast an unknown northern English boy to play Jamie, increasing the impact of Cooper’s win. Cooper said during his acceptance speech: “When I started these drama classes, I didn’t expect to be in the United States, never mind here.” Cooper’s win emphasizes that you do not need to be born with powerful connections or have film credits to your name to become successful in the acting world.

Graham won the categories of Best Lead Actor in a Limited Series, playing Jamie’s father, and Outstanding Limited Series with co-creator Jack Thorne. Actress Erin Doherty, who played Jamie’s psychologist Briony, won Best Supporting Actress in a Limited Series

In the series, Briony attempts to understand Jamie’s mindset, leading him to express a variety of emotions, ranging from arrogance to aggravation. The third episode depicts the last meeting between the accused and his psychologist, creating a sense of exigency in their conversation. The episode begins with her questioning Jamie, which soon turns into a conversation about the stabbing of his classmate Katie. Their final scene shows Briony breaking down into tears after Jamie reveals information about his consumption of disturbing online content. This final scene elicits an emotional response from the audience, grasping the impacts of the Red Pill content that many young boys consume.

The show generated popularity on its own; it became Netflix’s second most-watched English-language series ever. It has been shown across schools in the U.K. as a way to spark conversations with young people about harmful social media use. 

Stephen Graham told the Associated Press that he wanted to focus on the “relatively normal” life of people accused of crimes similar to Jamie’s. Graham said, “We’re all maybe accountable. School. Society. Parents. Community.” 

Hopefully, this recognition can provoke similar action among schools in other countries—especially in North America, where the Emmys are filmed and originate. With 7.4 million people viewing this ceremony, it may guide more people to educate themselves on the extremely relevant issues among youth today that are brought up in the show: Issues that can mean life or death.

Fact or Fiction, Science & Technology

Fact or fiction: Is your brain wired for a specific learning style?

You have likely encountered the idea that everyone learns best through a specific ‘learning style.’ Social media, classroom discussions, and even online quizzes often promote this claim, categorizing students as auditory, visual, writing and reading, or kinesesthetic learners. This conception sounds convincing, and after many years in the educational system, you may have identified a style for yourself.

However, according to neuroscience, the belief in fixed learning styles is a neuromyth—a misconception about the brain stemming from a misunderstanding of scientific facts that has been endorsed by the public and educators.

In an email to The Tribune, Armin Yazdani, academic associate with the Office of Science Education (OSE), and OSE’s resident neuroscientist, explained why this widely believed idea fails under scientific scrutiny.

“While we may have a preference for receiving information in one modality, we do not have good evidence that these preferences actually predict better learning. While brain cells in the eye may only respond to photons of light or brain cells in the ear may only respond to pressure waves, the brain as a system is multi-sensory,” Yazdani wrote. “Learning involves neuroplasticity or the creation of neural connections in various brain regions. Memory is distributed across brain regions that are highly interconnected in networks, and retrieving something requires the activation of these networks based on task demand, not [a] learner’s single sensory channel.”

Yazdani further dispelled this myth by pointing to a popular psychological experiment known as the Stroop effect.

“Imagine if I show you the word “RED” written in blue ink and ask you for the ink colour. To get to the correct answer, the brain recruits a wide range of neurons in the visual cortex, language areas, and attention networks.”

Learning works in a similar way: It involves the integration of information from distributed brain regions rather than dependence on a single sensory modality, despite the impression that only one sensory channel is at work.

Given that this theory is false, students may wonder how it still remains popular. Yazdani wrote that its appeal lies in its simplicity, making it easy for educators to disseminate.

“This myth is so pervasive because teachers propagate it mostly [….] It feels intuitive, which means teachers understand it and can explain it well to students. It’s also actionable, which means they can tailor their instruction to a student’s ‘learning style.’ Misinformation spreads faster and farther than facts, and we have been in a losing battle against this one.”

If learning styles aren’t the answer, what does neuroscience say improves learning, and how can students discover what works best for them? Yazdani highlighted three evidence-based strategies supported by cognitive neuroscience.

“It is context dependent, but we have evidence that dual coding may work better. This is where we use multiple complementary representations—visual and auditory—to create stronger memory traces.”

Yazdani also recommended spacing out study sessions to support memory consolidation.

 “If you are a student, I would highly recommend two other strategies. One is to space out your study sessions: Three one hour sessions are better than one three hour session. The second one is retrieval practice, where you actively recall information from memory—practice tests, flashcards.”

To help put these strategies into practice, the OSE offers a neuroscience-based program called SciLearn. Open to all undergraduates, participants explore research on the neuroscience of learning via workshops, lectures, and study sessions. SciLearn also focuses on debunking neuromyths, such as the theory of specific preferential learning styles.

“We have evidence that participating in even a short SciLearn guest lecture is beneficial. We start with unlearning by dispelling common myths and misconceptions. We then discuss evidence based study strategies based on neuroscience and our own research, which many students adopt. We know that SciLearners may also shift their mindset and better plan, assess, and monitor their learning,” Yazdani wrote.

Therefore, fact or fiction: Is your brain wired for a specific learning style? Neuroscience says no. Learning isn’t a fixed trait, but rather a skill.

Cycling, Sports

UAE Team Emirates wins Grand Prix de Cycliste Montréal for second consecutive year

Both cycling fans and pro-Palestine demonstrators gathered in Montréal’s Mont-Royal Park and its surrounding area for the 14th annual Grands Prix Cycliste de Montréal (GPC de Montréal) on Sept. 14.

The GPC de Montréal is the only top-ranked professional cycling series hosted in North America, and is a Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) registered road race. It consists of two events: a 216 km race in Quebec City and a 209.1 km race through Montreal. The Montreal course features 17 laps of steep, winding roads on Mont-Royal, with a total elevation of 4,573 m. This year, 207 riders competed, including nine Canadians—seven of them representing the Canadian National Team.

Teammates Brandon McNulty and Tadej Pogačar of UAE Team Emirates were the first to cross the finish line. The duo completed the race in five hours and 14 minutes. McNulty, an American racer, crossed ahead of the famed Slovenian cyclist, Pogačar, by a friendly few milliseconds. Pogačar, a two-time winner of the GPC de Montréal—in 2022 and 2024—also holds the 2025 Tour de France title, the 2024 UCI World Road Championship, and an arguable position as one of the greatest cyclists of all time. Pogačar’s performance on Sept. 14 shaved 14 minutes off his winning GPC de Montréal time last year, despite disruptions caused by a protest along the av. du Parc race section.

The top Canadian result came from Hugo Houle of Israel—Premier Tech (IPT), who finished 45th, 15 minutes and one second behind McNulty. IPT was at the center of the day’s demonstrations, where an estimated 200 protesters gathered along the race barriers on av. du Parc to call on the UCI to exclude IPT from competition in light of Israel’s continuous acts of genocide in Gaza. 

Israel—Premier Tech has close ties to Montréal. Sylvan Adams, who has since moved to Israel, is a Quebec-born billionaire with a strong affiliation with McGill University and co-ownership of the IPT team. Adams has heavily contributed to the development of IPT since its inception in 2014, and has long been the subject of criticism from pro-Palestinian groups, notably for his publicly made declaration as a “self-appointed ambassador to Israel.”

The IPT’s connection to the province also derives from its title partner and sponsor, Premier Tech, a Quebec-based agricultural technology company. Further, these ties echo a $29 million CAD donation made by Adams in 2022 to McGill University to establish the Sylvan Adams Sports Science Institute (SASSI). This funding established a partnership between McGill, Adams, and Tel Aviv University, drawing further concerns from pro-Palestinian campus advocates as they push the university to cut all financial ties to Israel

Supported by various pro-Palestine and Gaza-affiliated Montreal cycling clubs, such as Bikers for Palestine—who shared details about the protest through their social media accounts—the demonstration at the GPC de Montréal also garnered support from Montreal’s chapters of Students for Palestine’s Honour and Resistance (SPHR). 

The Montreal protest followed demonstrations at the Vuelta a España, a three-week UCI race across Spain, where a crowd of nearly 100,000 called for Israel to be barred from international sporting events. Following the disruptions, which cut the championship race short, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón publicly urged for Israel’s exclusion from global competitions. The team stripped its uniforms of any direct references to Israel in response to the protests at the Vuelta. They wore their adapted uniforms in Montreal on Sunday. 

Looking ahead, Montreal will host the UCI World Championship from Sept. 20-27, 2026. Last held in Montreal in 1974, the event is expected to be the largest sporting competition in the city since the 1976 Olympic Games, bringing together 1,000 elite cyclists from more than 75 countries

This year’s GPC de Montréal highlighted the city’s prominent role in international cycling in two important ways: Its world-class competition, and the political debates at play within the sport. As Montreal prepares to host the 2026 UCI World Championship, it faces the challenge of balancing athletic excellence with questions of accountability beyond the race course. 

Science & Technology, STEM EVENTS

Lava planets: Where oceans of magma rage and wind breaks the speed of sound

One side of these planets sits at temperatures hot enough not only to melt, but to vaporize their solid rocky surface, creating oceans of molten lava and an atmosphere of vaporized rock. On the other side, the cold is unrelenting—temperatures reach well below -200 degrees Celsius, allowing its surface to remain solid. These extremes are among some of the strange features of lava planets

On Sept. 19, at the third Physics Society Colloquium of the 2025-2026 academic year, Nicolas B. Cowan, associate professor of Physics and Earth & Planetary Sciences at McGill, gave a lecture on the physics of lava planets. Lava planets are a kind of exoplanet—a planet outside of our solar system—that have permanent oceans of liquid hot magma raging at the surface. Cowan began by describing just how hot lava planets get—somewhere around 2,700 degrees Celsius, or 3,000 degrees kelvin.

“To put that in perspective, 3,000 kelvin is actually the median surface temperature of stars in the galaxy,” Cowan said. “That’s like your run-of-the-mill average star, [which] is a mid-M dwarf star, and it’s got a surface temperature of 3,000 kelvin, so the surface of this planet is actually that temperature. It’s pretty hot.”

As with any planet orbiting a star, lava planets have day and night sides, with the former directly facing the star and the latter facing the cold, dark void of space. They orbit so closely to their star that they can complete a whole revolution in a mere few hours—something which Earth takes 365 days to achieve. 

Similarly to our moon, lava planets are tidally locked, meaning the same side is always facing its star: It is on this day side where magma oceans rage. 

Cowan noted that magma oceans have been a topic of discussion long before they were discovered on existing planets.

“Magma oceans are not some [newly] made up thing. People talked about magma oceans before lava planets, and that’s because we think that all rocky worlds, including the Earth, the moon, Mercury, whatever, all the planets start off molten.”

Rocky planets go through a period of being molten as a result of the energy dissipated when they first form. As layers of space dust and particulate matter come together, the pressure increases, thus increasing temperature and creating a molten state. The difference between planets like Earth and planets like K2-141B—a known lava planet—is that the latter’s molten lava ocean is a permanent fixture. On planets like Earth, the lava ocean eventually solidifies.

Cowan then went on to describe the atmosphere of lava planets. In every atmosphere—whether it surrounds Earth or K2-141B—winds are caused by air moving from areas of high to low pressure. Temperature and pressure are directly proportional; thus, the stark temperature difference between the day and night sides of lava planets results in abnormally fast winds emerging from the day side, in some cases travelling 1.75 kilometres per second—or five times the speed of sound. 

Coming down from the atmosphere, Cowan then discussed lava planets’ interior. Rock—which makes up a lava planet’s outer layer—is composed of a variety of chemical substances, the most abundant of which is silicon dioxide. Because of its complex chemical make-up, the rocky surface does not melt and solidify uniformly. The section between the approximately 100-kilometre-deep magma ocean and the planet’s solid iron core is in a state scientifically known as ‘mush’—a mixture of solid and liquid phases. 

Cowan concluded his lecture by explaining why lava planets end up orbiting so closely to their star. These planets could not have formed in such intense heat, as the temperatures in these close orbits would have vaporized any rocky material, thereby preventing it from solidifying and forming a planet. Cowan instead proposed that lava planets obtained their orbit by way of high eccentricity migration—a process by which a space body’s orbit shrinks and circularizes because of the effects of a nearby space body. In other words, these planets likely formed farther away and moved inward over time. 

Ultimately, the study of lava planets improves our understanding of the universe and the processes of planet formation and development, both within and beyond our solar system.

Baseball, Cross-Country / Track, Football, Golf, Lacrosse, Martlets, Men's Varsity, Rugby, Soccer, Sports

A month of McGill Sports leaves room for improvement

Sept. 22 marked one month since the start of the 2025-2026 McGill Fall Athletics season. So far, the Martlets and Redbirds are off to a rough start and are looking to regain their athletic prowess. 

Redbirds Football is at a tipping point, with their season locked up with two wins and two losses. They started the season strong with a home-field win against Université de Sherbrooke’s Vert Et Or on Aug. 22. However, they were unable to secure wins at either of their away games on Aug. 30 versus the Université Laval Vert Et Rouge and on Sept. 5 versus the Concordia University Stingers. Despite their subsequent home-field win against the Université de Montréal Carabins on Sept. 19, the Redbirds will have to learn how to capture victories on the road if they want a winning season. 

Soccer has experienced a similar start to the year, with both the Martlets and Redbirds having difficulty sealing wins. In their regular seasons, the Martlets are 2–1–4 and the Redbirds are 1–2–2, with both teams most recently tying the Vert Et Or on Sept. 19. However, both teams have seven matches left until the Réseau du sport étudiant du Québec (RSEQ) Semifinals, so it is not too late for them to end on top if they can start to outscore their opponents. 

Redbirds Lacrosse is in for another successful season this year, and has already earned a 4–1 record with much of their season left. Senior midfielder Joshua Jewell has spearheaded this accomplishment, scoring seven goals across the team’s two winning games and being named McGill’s Athlete of the Week on Sept. 15. Another senior midfielder, John Miraglia, scored a hat-trick during the Redbirds’ win against Trent University on Sept. 14

Redbirds Rugby are coming off a win in Sherbrooke versus the Bishop’s University Gaiters. This brings them to a 2–1 record. However, with such a short season, they will have to keep up the momentum in Ottawa this coming weekend to secure a home-field advantage in the RSEQ Semifinal. Martlets Rugby is having a tough time this season, having just come off a loss against Concordia on Sept. 21 to bring their season record to 0–4. The Martlets unfortunately have not finished within 20 points of any of their opponents, and have only two games left to prove themselves before the RSEQ Semifinal on Oct. 12

Redbirds Baseball is having a difficult start, with a 3–7 record. This past weekend, they broke even at Carleton University, beating the Ravens twice on Saturday, then falling to them twice on Sunday. On Saturday, rookie catcher Nathaniel Steffler snagged two runs, and catcher Robert Glusker earned two hits, a walk, and two runs scored. The team’s season is far from over, with 15 games left before the Canadian National University Championships, which are being held in Montreal this year.

McGill Golf have finished middle-of-the-pack in their past two tournaments, though star players have stood out. The Redbirds finished sixth of nine teams and the Martlets finished third of six teams in the teams’ first tournament, held on Aug. 24-25. During the second tournament, the Martlets secured the same ranking, and the Redbirds improved, finishing fourth out of nine teams. Martlets’ Astoria Yen has shone on the green and tied for first place out of 26 women players in the tournament last week, securing McGill Athlete of the Week on Sept. 15. Golf looks to improve its standings during the RSEQ Championships from Sept. 22-24 in Trois-Rivières, Quebec. 

The McGill Cross Country team started their season off strong at the McGill Invitational this past Saturday, Sept. 20 at Parc Mont-Royal. The Martlets runners came in first and the Redbirds finished fourth of nine teams. Most notably, Martlets’ Sienna Matheson earned silver in the women’s race. 

It is not the first month back that fans may have hoped for, but McGill’s Fall sports teams still have a chance to turn their seasons around, to get out of the dangerous middle range in their respective leagues, and to strive for the championship-bound path.

Author and Sports Editor Clara Smyrski is a member of the McGill Women’s Field Hockey team and thus cannot comment on their performance this season.

Editorial, Opinion

True nation-building is rooted in our environment

A wave of reinvigorated commitment to infrastructural expansion is sweeping the uppermost echelons of Canadian government. On Sept. 10, as an extension of the Building Canada Act, Prime Minister Mark Carney released a list of five major ‘nation-building’ projects aiming to “turbo-charge” the Canadian economy and create jobs. Meanwhile, Quebec Premier Legault is calling to suspend environmental goals to make economic development the province’s top priority. Instead of prioritizing the environment and its inhabitants, powerful political leaders like Carney and Legault are promoting an image of national development rooted in spectacle and glorified extraction.

While Carney claims his proposed nation-building projects are geared towards “protecting Canada’s rigorous environmental standards,” their environmental impacts will be undoubtedly detrimental—an outcome Legault is eager to ignore. One of these five projects, for example, aims to double the production of liquified natural gas (LNG)—a greenhouse gas which is 80 times more potent than CO2 in the short term, and 30 times more potent in the long run. Two other projects aim to expand mines in Saskatchewan and northwest BC—an endeavour that destroys land, uproots ecosystems, and contaminates water and air with harmful sulfuric acid. 

Normally, such projects would undergo strict environmental assessment to ensure their alignment with Canada’s national sustainability standards and climate plan, such as reducing national carbon emissions by 40 per cent below the 2005 levels by 2030, and reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. However, Legault’s demands to speed up these assessment processes threaten to break this promise and reverse the decisive progress Canada has made in reducing CO2 emissions over the past several years.

Additionally, though Carney advertised the inclusion of Indigenous leaders in the planning process, the burden of ecological damage from these projects falls heavily on the shoulders of Indigenous and rural communities. Such damage reflects a long history of eco-racism against Indigenous Peoples in Canada who are already disproportionately harmed and displaced by extractive mining and the production of oil and gas. Rewriting ecological guidelines to enable destructive ‘nation-building’ projects does not uplift Canada’s national image—it corrupts it by uprooting Indigenous land, polluting public air and water with toxic sulphur, and eschewing Canada’s uniquely low carbon footprint.

A ‘nation-building’ agenda whose success relies on environmental destruction is neither people-first nor, in the long run, profit-first. A people-first agenda would not pollute or uproot the environments in which people live and upon which they depend. An agenda committed to long-term profit would not raze ecosystems irreversibly to the ground.

In fact, a truly people-first—and, in the long run, profitable—agenda is one that starts with an eye toward the environment. In the past ten years, the damages of climate change have cut $25 billion CAD off of Canadian GDP—a deficit which will compound over time if the country does not commit to nature-based climate solutions and damage control. Investing in the environment is the smartest choice Canada can make if it seeks to be truly nation-building, rather than risking its future for the allure of immediate profit. 

Despite the federal government’s demonstrated disregard for Canadian ecosystems—and thus Canadian people—McGill has risen to the occasion as a leader in sustainability, setting a crucial precedent for other institutions. Not only is the university publicly committed to the goals of zero-waste, carbon neutrality, and increased climate resilience, but it has taken tangible steps towards these goals

As students, we must familiarize ourselves with McGill’s sustainability plan and adopt actionable steps to push it forward. As an institution, McGill must not settle into complacency, but continue to be proactive in revising, adapting, and expanding its sustainability goals. 

At the federal level, Canada’s political leaders must reconceptualize the kind of nation they want to build, beginning with a reaffirmation of Canada’s legally-bound commitment to the Paris Agreement. Right now, Carney and Legault are sending a clear message that economically successful nation-building is, by design, in opposition to environmental sustainability. It is only when our leaders abandon this conviction that Canada can abandon nation-branding for true nation-building. By reassessing the relationships between human, environmental, and economic prosperity—beyond those assumed by capitalist political rhetoric—we find that, in fact, it is not hard to imagine a world in which the three are mutual beneficiaries, where the improvement and strengthening of one brings the same prosperity to the others. 

Commentary, Opinion

Maple-washing by grocery giants threatens the Canadian domestic market

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) confirmed 12 cases of ‘maple-washing’ between February and May 2025, a marketing tactic that exploits Canadian patriotism to encourage sales of imported goods. The agency caught multiple grocery chains promoting non-Canadian products using “Product of Canada” and “Made in Canada” labels, as well as a maple leaf symbol, thus threatening consumer trust, harming local businesses, and disadvantaging the domestic market in the process. 

The CFIA can fine offenders up to $15,000 CAD when they jeopardize access to Canadian goods on the market. Yet, the agency issued no fines over the recently observed cases of maple-washing, despite their clear violation of Canada’s advertising laws. The CFIA’s reasons for the lack of fines stay vague; it states that labels had been corrected and issues therefore settled. Grocers receiving complaints have tagged false labelling as mere errors—and the CFIA seem more than willing to ignore the corporations’ plausibly calculated intentions. 

However, incidents of false advertising deemed ‘simple mistakes’ have not gone away nor settled following the issuance of complaints. In fact, maple-washing saw a recent increase: The CFIA observed more than 70 complaints in July and August. Maple-washing’s rise in prevalence represents a strategic ploy by non-Canadian corporations. As Canadians attempt to promote the domestic market amidst tariff disputes and tensions with the White House, maple-washing offers a sly way to boost sales of boycotted imported goods. 

President Trump’s reiterations—in March and June—of his wish to colonize Canada as the U.S.’ 51st state, combined with new 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods implemented on Aug. 1, galvanized Canadians into promoting domestic industry. The ‘Buy Canadian’ movement emerged as consumers began to prioritize buying local: 45 per cent of Canadians state they actively boycott U.S. goods in response to tariffs, choosing instead to purchase Canadian substitutes. McGill students shopping around campus at Provigo and Metro may have been impacted by maple-washing, as they have an incentive to buy Canadian as a statement against Trump’s policies. 

Aware of these changes in consumer preferences, corporations have used maple leaf logos or “Made in Canada” labels to avoid market share decline. Riding the wave of Canadian patriotism to promote international products is a clever marketing strategy. However, it becomes an unethical one when companies weaponize nationalism for profit by lying to their customers about their products’ country of origin. 

The CFIA led a four-month investigation against Canadian grocery store Sobeys over imported avocado oil marketed as “Made in Canada,” but closed the case without issuing any penalties. The CFIA’s failure to act on recognized maple-washing pushes aside customers’ concerns and rights to accurate, truthful advertising. Consumers who have reported maple-washing cases say grocers have eroded their trust and demand punishment for misleading marketing patterns. 

Montreal lawyer Joey Zukran took matters into his own hands in mid-September by seeking court approval to sue Provigo, Metro, and Sobeys, among other companies. After witnessing the CFIA’s inaction, Zukran aims to show that systemic false advertising cannot go unpunished. 

As a result of maple-washing, Canada is losing an opportunity to benefit from its tariff war with the United States. By fearing a loss in capital, corporations have selfishly squandered Canada’s chance to capitalize on nationalistic momentum transparently and without threatening long-term market development. Instead, local companies remain overshadowed by imported goods even when citizens express a strong commitment to strengthening the national economy through their individual consumption choices. 

Labelling inaccuracies, when recurring and consistently made by multiple commercial corporations, are not mistakes. Companies falsely promoting products as Canadian should suffer a penalty: Normalizing incorrect labelling allows misleading advertising to secure its position in the food-selling industry. Until fines follow from fraud, the maple leaf risks regressing from a national emblem to a mere marketing gimmick.

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

‘The Missing Image Is: Gaza’ counter-screening calls attention to absence

“To omit Palestine is a political act.” 

These words, drawn from a public statement by Montreal-based film collective Regards Palestiniens, call out the 2025 edition of the Biennale d’art contemporain, In Praise of the Missing Image. On its website, the Biennale boasts that its diverse programming, which seeks to “amplify emancipatory voices” and invite reflection on “gaps in individual and collective memory,” features works by Canadian and international artists from a vast array of countries, provinces, and communities. Yet in both the programming and the curatorial statement, Palestine is distinctly absent. 

This flagrant exclusion is what inspired the Regards Palestiniens’ counter-screening, The Missing Image Is: Gaza. On the crisp evening of Tuesday, Sept. 16, over 100 people gathered with camping chairs, blankets, and keffiyehs in the parking lot across from articule Gallery. The 65-minute program “seeks to restore meaning” to the Biennale’s title, originally drawn from Rithy Panh’s film The Missing Picture about the Cambodian genocide and Khmer Rouge regime

The first screening and the most recent of the four films, Firas Shehadeh’s Final Hour Log – Handala, firmly asserts the theme’s pertinence. Using mostly livestream footage, Shehadeh reconstructs the final hour of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition’s civilian vessel Handala before it was seized by the Israeli Navy on July 26, 2025. A rapid escalation follows as, within minutes, the team scrambles to hide their memory cards and raise their hands in a display of peace. Nonetheless, Israeli naval officers storm the vessel, and one turns off the CCTV camera that was livestreaming. The film understands the power of images—the importance of “preserving what was meant to be erased,” as the website states. 

Footage in the other three films spans seven decades, weaving together a spectrum of time and experience in Palestine. The steady current through all of them, though, is the dualism of Palestinian life. Sweet scenes of children and family are cast against a plea for help recorded after the Shuja’iyah massacre in Hadeel Assali’s Shuja’iyah: Land of the Brave. Sunny shores of Gaza peppered with flowers contrast a thoughtful reflection on the role of televised media in Oraib Toukan’s Offing. The personal and the political become inextricable as a frantic mother mourns her home destroyed by bombing in Mustafa Abu Ali’s Scenes of the Occupation from Gaza

The Regards Palestiniens counter-screening thus begs the question: Are images of Gaza actually missing, or just ignored? While social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook continue to systematically censor Palestinian content, since Oct. 7, some Palestinian creators have broken through the algorithm, documenting their stories and struggles on their own terms. The fact that images and stories from Palestine now permeate far beyond social media is a testament to the unwavering determination of these journalists, whose voices have successfully drawn Palestine into the international limelight. The same day as the Regards Palestiniens screening, a UN Commission found that Israel is committing genocide in the Gaza Strip. 

In the social media age, it’s less likely that images of suffering are totally missing and more often that they are short-lived or turned into spectacle in the popular consciousness and ignored by actors capable of enacting real change.

The Missing Image Is: Gaza is acutely and solemnly aware of this because it is precisely what makes the Biennale’s exclusion of Palestine really bite. “This exclusion is not accidental but the result of deliberate curatorial silence,” insists the Regards Palestinians team in their statement. Art has the potential to reach broad audiences and the power to introduce and elevate new perspectives. When exhibitions adopt radical aesthetics, they must earnestly believe in and bravely commit to them.

Off the Board

Make libraries cool again

On Monday, as I was parting ways with a friend, she casually mentioned, “I’m going to the library to pick up a book for my research.” This phrase stuck with me—not because of what she said, but because of how rare it is to hear someone, especially a student, talk about going to the library not to study or kill time between classes, but to find a book that aids their current research interest.

The next day, when another friend of mine suggested we visit Westmount Library, I spontaneously agreed. After wandering through the greenhouse and settling into a cozy spot, I began drafting this piece. Writing in a beautiful, hushed corner reminds me that these library spaces are more than just quiet rooms with Wi-Fi and outlets.

As I enter my second year of university and transition out of introductory courses, I’m realizing that deep, rigorous research isn’t just about gathering sources; it’s about knowing where to look and how to think. With the convenience of the Internet at our fingertips, we’ve come to rely on quick answers—but at what cost? Have we sacrificed the ability to critically evaluate sources in favour of speed? In this digital age, libraries push us to slow down in our research, ask better questions, and dig beyond an article’s introduction.

But these questions also lead me to wonder: Have we collectively forgotten how to use libraries? Or worse—do we not value them anymore?

With the rise of online databases, academic search engines, and, most recently, AI tools like ChatGPT, the role of the library as a physical epicentre of reference sources and research materials is fading. Why trek across the city or even across campus when information is just a few clicks away? But, in our convenience-driven approach to knowledge, we don’t just fail to take advantage of free, physical books; we also miss out on the library’s ecosystem of services designed to help us in our quest for knowledge. 

Libraries are not just buildings that store books or offer an aesthetic place to study. They are the beating heart of research and scholarship. 

Beyond storing the books themselves, libraries are staffed with trained research experts—human search engines, if you will—who can point you toward resources you didn’t know existed, offer perspectives on a thesis you hadn’t considered, or guide you through citation databases you’ve never used.

With 10,834,072 physical and digital items at our disposal in the collection of the McGill Libraries, members of the McGill community have access to a vast range of materials from rare manuscripts to cutting-edge research journals. Beyond this impressive collection, McGill’s libraries also provide workshops such as the Introduction to Zotero workshop, teaching crucial skills for writing and managing citations. Or, if this article has re-ignited your interest in the library, the McGill library also offers a “Library Research Skills” workshop.

It is clear to me, as I sit in a library to write about libraries, that we need to shift the narrative surrounding these essential institutions. Libraries are not outdated—they are underutilized. If we, as students and emerging researchers, can reframe libraries as active tools in our academic lives, we’ll not only write better papers—we’ll become better thinkers.

So, let’s make libraries cool again. Not by plastering them with neon signs or turning them into Instagrammable study spots, but by using them, valuing them, pondering in the stacks, and remembering what they’re really for.

Features

Bills, borders, and breaches

Subhead: An investigation into the militarization, surveillance, and foreign influence behind Canada’s ‘Strong Borders Act’

Author: Helene Saleska, News Editor

In December 2024, the Government of Canada announced a $1.3 billion CAD plan to expand militarization and surveillance along the U.S.-Canada border. The plan includes the deployment of drones, helicopters, and mobile surveillance towers as part of a new Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Aerial Intelligence Task force, along with a commitment to 24-hour aerial surveillance. Nicknamed the ‘Strong Borders Act,’ the project is now part of Bill C-2, introduced in the House of Commons in June. 

By increasing border surveillance, imposing new immigration and visa restrictions, and expanding law enforcement powers, Bill C-2 is a direct attack on human rights. It limits migrants’ abilities to claim refugee status and broadly revokes many resident and work visas. The bill also undermines the rights of all Canadians by expanding private, military, and police surveillance capabilities, while allowing broad international data sharing. To many, Bill C-2 is an effort to appease U.S. President Donald Trump, who repeatedly accuses Canada of allowing undocumented migration as well as gun and drug smuggling into the U.S. 

Consequently, this bill begs the question of whether Canada, in the name of security, is pursuing the same political path of racist exclusion, surveillance, and human rights abuses as the United States. 

Canada’s recent trend towards increased security and militarization demonstrates how Western settler-colonial states reinforce each other’s ability to oppress and control certain groups by sharing tactics, technology, and information, particularly in the realm of border security and surveillance. While Canada is often perceived as the United States’ friendly next-door neighbor, Canada’s reciprocal relationship with the United States and Israel perpetuates the narrative that the need for increased ‘security’ justifies violating necessary protections of human rights. 

U.S. Immigration: A template for Canada?  

Since January, the world has watched Trump’s escalating use of inhumane migrant detention centres for undocumented migrants and asylum seekers, illegal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids on both public spaces and private homes, broad interpretation of immigration law, and increased militarization. 

Arizona State Senator Analise Ortiz told //The Tribune// in an interview that ICE agents sometimes wait for days outside schools and hospitals—places once considered ‘sensitive locations’ where people should feel safe. 

“There are very clear constitutional concerns about how ICE is policing and surveilling people in our communities,” she said. 

ICE Agent Howard Bolick, who refuses to go back to the job under the current leadership, also spoke to //The Tribune// about the blatant human rights abuses the agency is committing. 

“[The border patrol under Trump] is constantly trying to expand their mission, they get into investigations that they don’t know how to do, and civil rights to them is just something to be worked around,” Bolick said. 

He explained that even his ICE unit, Homeland Security Investigations, which is charged with handling only high-level criminal investigations, is now doing raids of places like Home Depot, explicitly racial profiling by using “brown skin” or “speaking Spanish” as a justification for arrest. 

Bolick emphasized that these practices do not make the country safer; in fact, they do the opposite. He fears that the critical investigation into organized crime and trafficking executed by agents in his time is now being abandoned in favour of indiscriminate arrests and imprisonments, targeting ethnicity while disregarding due process. 

U.S. border militarization is not new, nor are the inadequacies of U.S. immigration policies for migrants. But Trump has escalated enforcement to unprecedented heights—increasing ICE surveillance and deploying the National Guard on civilians—under the auspices of public safety. 

These developments serve as a warning for Canada, where a similar pattern is emerging: Bill C-2 threatens to upend the lives of migrants and breach the privacy rights of all Canadians. And this is not an anomaly. Like the U.S., Canada receives much of its military and surveillance technology from Israel, making the parallels between these two nations overwhelmingly stark.  

A shared infrastructure of surveillance

In July, Canada approved $37.2 million CAD in exports of military aid to Israel—but the aid flows in the other direction too: Canada imports Israeli military and surveillance technology. Just as Canadian aid to Israel supports the enormous surveillance apparatus and militarization of Palestine, the technologies made in Israel with Canadian money go to increasing surveillance on Canadians. 

Israel is one of the world’s largest manufacturers and exporters of high-tech military and surveillance technology, often testing spyware and AI surveillance on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank before exporting them, where they are used to oppress other groups of people around the world. 

As of August 2025, Electronic Frontier Foundation mapped 579 surveillance towers across the U.S.-Mexico border, creating what they call a ‘virtual wall.’ Most were developed and installed by Elbit Systems—Israel’s largest military and surveillance contractor. 

In my home state of Arizona, 55 Elbit Integrated Fixed Towers now stand on and around both the U.S.-Mexico border and the Tohono O’odham Indigenous Nation’s border. The towers increase the mortality risks of migrants crossing the desert from Mexico into the south of the U.S. by pushing them towards more dangerous desert routes.  

But Canada is not just a bystander in this system. It plays a role in enabling the U.S.’s application of this technology and maintains its own secretive technology-sharing agreements with Israel. Public information about Canada’s military trade deals, purchases, and production cooperation partnerships is detailed by the Database of Israeli Military and Security Export. This details Canada’s purchase of Israel’s Iron Dome radar technology, frequent deals with Elbit Systems, and annual military imports from Israel of up to $100 million CAD

Concerns about Israeli surveillance technology in Canada extend beyond the military, with researchers uncovering possible use of spyware by provincial police on Canadian citizens. In March, Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto discovered evidence of a sale to Canada from an unknown vendor of an Israeli ‘mercenary spyware’ technology called //Graphite//, developed by Paragon Solutions. Researchers believe it was used by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) in investigations against citizens, which the OPP neither confirms nor denies. The spyware from Paragon Solutions has also been found on the cell phones of journalists and human rights activists around the world.

Lack of oversight

Canada is sacrificing its commitment to privacy in the name of expanding surveillance. 

Kate Robertson, senior researcher at Citizen Lab, explained in an interview with //The Tribune// that although Canada has historically been much more forceful in protecting citizens’ privacy than the United States, its privatization of surveillance systems and increasing use by police forces is going unchecked. 

“We’re now seeing gaps in laws that are growing into, frankly, chasms about the privatization of surveillance, and the shift to […] policing that [is] increasingly distant from oversight and meaningful controls by privacy regulators in the courts,” Robertson reported. 

She also stressed the need for increased parliamentary oversight of new surveillance technology. 

“We have pointed to the need for Parliament to play its critical function in regulating and overseeing surveillance systems that include the growing adoption and use of mercenary spyware, but also other forms of algorithmic or AI-fueled surveillance systems that are currently falling through the cracks.”  

Datasharing: Is Canada complicit in the U.S.’s disregard of migrant rights?

With the U.S. expanding its control over immigration, Canada is preparing to grant the U.S. further access to personal information about migrants and Canadians. The two countries are currently negotiating the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use Of Data (CLOUD) Act Agreement, which proposes to allow any U.S. law enforcement officer to receive personal data from any electronic communication or computing service in Canada, all without Canadian judicial oversight. 

According to Citizen Lab, Bill C-2 is a precursor to this law enforcement data-sharing agreement between the U.S. and Canada. The agreement could outright assist the U.S. in committing more atrocities against migrants and people of colour. 

As stated in Citizen Lab’s report, the sharing of this personal data, especially under the current U.S. administration, could make “the Canadian government and technology sector complicit in the data-fuelled criminalization and persecution of historically marginalized groups in the U.S. —groups whose equality and human rights, if they were in Canada, would be constitutionally guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

Kate Robertson described how this agreement opens the floodgates for privacy breaches and human rights abuses by the U.S. 

“When we’re talking about a new data sharing agreement under the CLOUD Act, we’re actually talking about […] Canada ceding sovereignty to the law enforcement authorities across the border to directly issue surveillance orders on companies or entities in Canada, without the involvement of the Canadian courts.” 

Robertson also expressed concern about how this shared data could be used by the U.S.

“There’s a high potential that some of the surveillance and information collection will be targeted towards migrants and refugees on both sides of the border, and with potentially significant consequences leading to family disruption or persons being deported to countries where they have fewer rights,” she said. 

This is yet another example of how a vast expansion in security and surveillance by the U.S., funded and militarized by Israel, encourages Canada’s disregard for migrant rights. 

Canada’s longstanding history with the U.S.  

Although the proposed CLOUD Agreement is much more extreme, Canada’s complicity in U.S. efforts for global domination is not new. For decades, Canada has participated in data sharing efforts, military alliances, and restrictive immigration agreements with the U.S.

According to a report from Queens University, after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Canada and Israel worked together in pioneering the new market for developing ‘counter-terrorism’ military technology and aid for the U.S.’s ‘War on Terror.’ 

In an interview with //The Tribune//, François Crépeau, McGill professor emeritus in the Faculty of Law, explained how the Canadian border has been used by the U.S. for greater military power.

“This border has been a testing ground for American surveillance, with drones being deployed ten years ago, which then served in wars. But at the time, they were tested on the Canadian border,” Crépeau said. 

He also spoke to the lack of oversight in data surveillance and data sharing when it comes to the Canada-U.S. border, even now, before any potential consequences of Bill C-2 or the CLOUD Agreement have come into effect. 

“Databases, including those that contain personal information of migrants, are exchanged between countries easily. When 9/11 happened, Canada accepted within weeks to transfer all passengers’ information to the U.S. for flights going from Canada to the U.S., without restriction. The U.S. could even publish all that information online,” Crépeau said. 

He explained the tightening of the already very restrictive immigration policy for refugees coming through the U.S. from a third country under the later stages of the Trudeau and Biden administrations. 

“[As a result of this renegotiation], there is no possibility to come across the terrestrial border from the U.S. to claim asylum in Canada, unless you are a U.S. citizen. You will be returned automatically.”

The foundation of xenophobic policy, privacy violations, and data sharing that was built before Trump—and thus before Bill C-2—is now allowing both governments to easily push these policies to their extremes. These policies, like the rhetoric of ‘security’ that governments use, were built for exploitation, not protection.  

Bigger than a Bill

McGill students and anyone calling Canada home must advocate against Bill C-2 to prevent its passage in Parliament. Through Bill C-2 and the CLOUD Agreement, Canada is set to facilitate a breach of privacy rights and deepen its complicity in violence against marginalized and colonized people all around the world—from Gaza to the U.S. to Mexico, and beyond. 

But we must remember that this is also bigger than any bill or presidential administration, that every struggle against pervasive state oppression is both ideologically and quite literally materially connected. Canada is working together with the U.S. and Israel to increase the use of the border as a tool for state surveillance and, therefore, for racial oppression and exclusion. Addressing these underlying issues will require institutional changes to dismantle the military industrial complexes, which fuel narratives and systems that call for increased ‘security’ while trampling human rights. 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue