Latest News

Laughing Matters, Opinion

The agonies of email etiquette and prof dudes

by Isaac Berman on

More in Laughing Matters:

Dear Professor Buddle,

You recently shared a rather condescending blurb about how McGill students should learn email etiquette, insinuating that most students do not put the correct amount of effort into the vital student-professor communication medium. I challenge this assumption. I’m not sure who originally wrote, “Hey Prof Dude,” but I can tell you from experience that the process of emailing a professor is anything but casual. It is a highly-involved inner struggle of self-loathing versus self-worth, of knowledge of basic grammar versus knowledge of email conventions—requiring pure mental fortitude. For me, that battle usually goes something like this.

First comes the agony of choosing an appropriate salutation:

“Hi Prof –“

Then I ask myself if they are even a professor. I Google them; their LinkedIn says, “Course Lecturer.”  This means a simple “Dr.” will suffice. A tinge of sadness washes over me, as I lament that this person is not yet able to put a simple “Associate Professor” title on their LinkedIn Profile, despite having spent the entirety of their 20s—and a good portion of their 30s—torturing themselves to become an expert on a topic so specific that they only have three peer references on JStor. I quickly remember that my own LinkedIn profile not only has an endorsement from my mom for my Microsoft Office skills, but also paragraphs of bullshit about how being a camp counsellor helps me “work as a member of a team” and prepares me to “multitask in a fast-paced environment.” My pity for this “Dr.” fades, and rapidly I return to self-loathing.

“Hi Dr. –”

Now comes the friendly greeting:

It’s Thursday, so I can’t say, “I hope you had a good week,” because that implies I don’t count Friday as a part of the week, and I can’t have Dr. _____, parent of two beautiful children, —“Gabby” and “Frederic” (I also find the “About Me” section of their academic site)—thinking that I don’t do work on Fridays.

“I hope you are doing well, and enjoying the nice weather we’ve been having.”

No good—it’s -20 degrees, and the snow resembles the set of a Tim Burton movie.

“I hope you are doing well.”

Next, the informational content of the email must be tasteful and not too forthright:

“I am writing to inform you that I will not be able to attend the lecture tomorrow as I have fallen ill.”

God, no one has said “fallen ill” since the Spanish flu. Why does typing in Outlook automatically make me write like I’m in an episode of The Crown? Screw it, I’m allowed to let my hair down every now and then.

“I am writing to inform you that I will not be able to attend the lecture tomorrow because I am sick.”

A wave of panic rushes over me as I realize that I didn’t have my privacy settings turned on when I stalked my course lecturer on LinkedIn. They will see that I stalked them, will judge me fiercely and aggressively, and will never respond to my future email asking for a grad school reference. Never mind the fact that the probable reason they won’t respond is because my entitled ass never once talked to them in person during their lecture of 30 students.

“Thank you in advance for your understanding, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to make up for the content that I will be missing.”

Thanking in advance is pretty presumptuous—who am I to assume that they will understand? Maybe they won’t understand at all and will promptly deduct a percentage point from my participation grade. Scratch the “thank you.”

Finally, the closing is the final note, so it must be perfect:

“Cheers,  – “

Too casual.

“Sincerely, —”

Too formal.

“Best regards, —”

Just right. I feel like Goldilocks.

After enduring this entire painstaking process, my email is later reciprocated by the course lecturer with a simple:

“K.

Sent from my iPhone.”

So, I ask you Professor Buddle, not to judge all students on the one simpleton who wrote “Hey Prof Dude.” Based on my own enduring struggles, I can only assume that the entire McGill student population is already a neurotic, over-analyzing mess when it comes to using electronic mail with our professors. Most of us wouldn’t be caught dead writing, “Hey Prof Dude.”

Best regards,

 

Isaac Berman

 

Isaac Berman is a U3 Computer Engineering Student. His childhood crush was Jane Goodall and his favourite pastime is filling out online resume forms for job applications.

 

@mcgilltribop | [email protected]
Science & Technology

Unveiling the mystery behind the “Super Blue Blood Moon”

by Jonah Dutz on

More in Science & Technology:

Those who looked up to the sky in the early hours of Jan. 31 were lucky enough to experience a rare trinity of lunar phenomena—the convergence of a “supermoon,” a “blue moon,” and a “blood moon.” The appearance of the ominous sounding “Super Blue Blood Moon” sparked world-wide conversation on its significance and origin.

The term “blue moon” refers to the appearance of a second full moon in a single calendar month. But what is a full moon exactly? Full moons occur when the Earth is located directly between the Sun and the Moon. Since full moons take place every 29.5 days on average, seeing two in one calendar month only happens, well, once in a blue moon. More specifically, they occur once every 2.716 years—about 3 per cent of all full moons.  

According to NASA, when a full moon coincides with its perigee—the point at which the Moon is closest to the Earth in its elliptic orbit—it’s called a “supermoon.” This makes the Moon appear slightly larger and brighter than it does on an average night. However, “Supermoon” isn’t an official term and the criteria for how close the full moon must be to its perigee isn’t well defined. As a result, “supermoons” are actually quite frequent, comprising 25 per cent of all full moons.

The most spectacular feature of the trifecta is its glowing red hue. This odd colouring lends the “blood moon” its nickname. “Blood moons” are lunar eclipses, which occur when a full moon intersects with the Earth’s orbital plane at points called “nodes.” The Earth’s shadow then covers the Moon, blocking all direct light from the Sun. Kelly Lepo, coordinator of the McGill Space Institute, described how this phenomenon gives “blood moons” their red tinge.

“The moon looks red because of the Earth’s atmosphere,” Lepo said. “While the Earth blocks the sunlight that normally hits the Moon, some light passes through the Earth’s atmosphere. The [particles in the] atmosphere scatter blue light [which has shorter wavelengths] and red light passes through, just like what happens during a sunset. In fact, if you were standing on the Moon during a lunar eclipse, you would see all of the sunsets and all of the sunrises on the Earth simultaneously. The Earth would have a red ring around it.”

Conditions on the Earth’s atmosphere during an eclipse can actually alter the shade of red that the Moon takes on. The amount of dust particles, water droplets, or clouds in the atmosphere can all affect how much light is scattered. According to National Geographic, even active volcanoes spewing ash into the atmosphere can trigger deep, blood-red eclipses.

Lepo says that lunar eclipses held special significance in ancient civilizations, as omens that foretold the death of a king.

“Lunar eclipses were considered evil omens in ancient Mesopotamia,” Lepo said. “When an eclipse was likely, a substitute king was appointed to the throne, to make sure that no harm came to the true king. After the eclipse, the substitute king was killed and the true king continued his reign.”

Total lunar eclipses are relatively rare, making up only 5.6 per cent of all full moons.  

Accordingly, “Super Blue Blood Moons” are exceptionally rare. Forbes did the math and found that they make up only 0.042 per cent of all full moons; that corresponds to roughly one every 265 years.

But for those kicking themselves for missing this three-for-one lunar deal, there’s no need. As Forbes kindly points out, the “blue” label is grounded only in human convention, and not in physical phenomena. In fact, moon-gazers can experience a “Super Blood Moon” as early as Jan. 21 of next year—so set those reminders.

Sports

In conversation with Montreal figure skating coach Bruno Marcotte

by Jordan Foy on

More in Sports:

After recent negotiations with its Southern neighbour, North Korea will be sending athletes to the upcoming Winter Olympic Games in PyeongChang, South Korea, beginning Feb. 8. Among the North Korean delegation are two athletes with a special connection to Canada: After spending last summer training with Canadian figure skating coach Bruno Marcotte in Montreal, Ryom Tae-Ok and Kim Ju-Sik will compete in pairs figure skating at the Games.

Ryom and Kim approached Marcotte at the World Championships in Helsinki last year, and asked him if he would be willing to work with them. Marcotte agreed, and the trio spent eight weeks training together.

“I gave them a lot of technical advice, and some strategy advice as far as how to maximize the number of points [received when they] compete,” Marcotte said. “I did a lot of mental work with them, to work on their confidence and make them believe in what they could eventually accomplish.”

During training sessions, Marcotte communicated with Ryom and Kim through a North Korean companion who had figure skating experience and could speak English. Over the course of the eight weeks, Marcotte was impressed by the duo’s work ethic and aptitude for learning.

“Their willingness to [learn meant that] there [were] no boundaries basically,” Marcotte said. “You say what’s in your mind, and they just want to take it in [….] Their work ethic is great, but work ethic is [just] one thing […. Seeing] their mental approach to the correction, […] trying to apply the correction and trying to make the coaches proud by [being] better every day. That was something else.”

When it was announced that the duo would attend the 2018 Olympics, Marcotte was delighted. What’s more, Ryom and Kim qualified based on their own skill—the only athletes from North Korea to earn a spot in the Olympics through the traditional route. Once you strip away the politics surrounding their country, Marcotte explained, you see that they are world-class skaters.

“They deserve to be there,” Marcotte said. “Once people get to know them and see them perform, they’re going to find that they’re two very extremely charismatic skaters. They perform with so much passion and emotion that people will quickly forget where they’re from and why they’re watching them.”

After training with Marcotte, Ryom and Kim will be taking a piece of Canada with them to PyeongChang: For their free skate, the North Korean skaters are performing to the song, “Je ne suis qu’une chanson,” by Ginette Reno, a Quebecois icon.

“[Reno’s] voice is so powerful, as she sings with her heart and her emotion,” Marcotte explained. “It’s exactly the way we [felt that they skated].”

For Marcotte, sharing a little Canadian and Montreal flavour with the North Korean skaters was an extremely rewarding experience.

“I love to share my love for this town I live in, this country that I’m from,” Marcotte said. “Any time that the world can be exposed to a local flavour you know, whether it’s Leonard Cohen or Ginette Reno or whatever […] for me it’s always something special.”

In the face of the media buzz surrounding the two skaters, Marcotte emphasized that, ultimately, his focus was always on the skaters and what he could offer them as a coach.

“My role is […] to help them out to reach their dream, and at the end of the day, […] no matter what the situation or the media attention, that I don’t forget who I am and what is my job,” Marcotte said. “It’s […] to inspire them and [help] them be better athletes.”

Although Marcotte won’t coach Ryom and Kim in PyeongChang, he is still excited to support them in person while they compete.

“They asked me to be there for them in the Games, which I will,” Marcotte said. “I have actually two Canadian pair teams and a South Korean team that I coach, so it’s just a matter of managing everybody. But I will give them all my support any way I can over there.”

McGill, News

VP University Affairs advocates for open educational resources at McGill

by Helen Wu on

More in McGill:

Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) University Affairs Isabelle Oke is seeking to raise awareness about Open Educational Resources (OERs) by holding an information session on Feb. 8. OERs are free teaching materials like study exercises, lecture presentations, and textbooks developed by professors and faculty from around the world. They are uploaded to online databases like OpenStax, which students and staff can access for free. No publishing firms are involved in the creation of OERs; rather, experts in a specific field work together to pool their knowledge and pass it on directly.

Although they have been presented as a possible strategy to reduce the financial burden of textbooks for students, there are a number of obstacles preventing OERs from becoming a widely-accepted alternatives at McGill.

“We can take advantage of OERs that are out there, and over time contribute to creating OERs, but it is up to administration and individual department levels to make those decisions on whether or not the faculty here at McGill should be charged to create open education resources or use them,” Associate Dean (User Services) Jeffrey Archer said.

Currently, there is no financial compensation for adding to OER databases. According to Archer, the McGill administration has not taken action to encourage faculty members to work on producing OERs.

Oke, is organizing the upcoming information session to familiarize the McGill community with OERs. She finds that it can be difficult to convince professors to substitute old, reliable sources of information for OERs. Not only must they become familiar with a new system, but the OERs’ validity must also be evaluated as the lack of peer review means they would potentially contain biased or faulty information. Oke hopes for McGill to popularize an organized and efficient way to compile OERs.

“OERs are being used all the time without any intentionality, but there haven’t been any developed through official McGill collaborations since the Open Online Courses projects,” Oke said. “There isn’t any sustainable process that creates OERs.”

To expand and promote OER usage at McGill, Archer and his team at the McGill Library plan to pull together a list of all the OER repositories and make them available to interested faculties.

“The OERs offer a way to relieve some of the financial burden of purchasing class materials on students,” Archer said. “It’s hard being a student. Within a single term you may even have $1,200 worth of textbooks, and making even a few of them available as OERs [can be] helpful.”

Science Senator Salma Youssef sees great potential for the implementation of these academic tools to help reduce expenses for students. She commends the BC Open Textbook Project, which has saved students over $5.7 million total in textbook fees.

“The world of OERs is much more than just free textbooks,” Youssef said. “It also includes professors publishing their work in open journals, which can be a tricky thing to get them to do [….] By changing McGill policies on tenure and promotion to include things such as considering how involved a professor is with OERs, how much they publish to open journals, and whether they adopt textbook/open resources for their courses, it would incentivize faculty to incorporate a lot more of it.”

A previous version of this article stated that the BC Open Textbook Project has saved students over $1.8 million in textbook fees. In fact, it has saved students over $5.7 million. The Tribune regrets this error.

McGill, News

SUS Council creates new office of VP Sustainability

by Jade Prévost-Manuel on

More in McGill:

On Jan. 31, the Science Undergraduate Society’s (SUS) General Council convened to deliberate proposed amendments to the SUS Clubs & Services by-laws and constitution. Council also discussed the society’s upcoming social events, including the SUS 25th anniversary gala and SUS Academia Week.

 

Council amends Clubs & Services by-laws

SUS President Jasmine Leung proposed a motion amending the SUS constitution and Clubs & Services by-laws. These amendments included removing the offices of Executive Revenue Officer (ERO) and Executor of Clubs and Services (ECS), and creating the office of Vice-President (VP) Sustainability. This motion passed.

The office of ECS, which is currently in charge of fostering relationships between SUS and its affiliated clubs, will be removed from the executive committee on May 1.

“This is the first year that we’ve had a full-time ECS as an SUS executive, and while the work that they’ve done has been super valuable and necessary, we’ve come to the conclusion that, after the initial set up of the portfolio, the day-to-day work is not large enough to constitute an entire portfolio,” Leung said.

After consultations with the current and former SUS VP Communications, Leung decided that the ECS’ work is better suited as part of that portfolio.

“[The current and former VP Communications] think that it would make for a reasonable addition to [the VP Communications] portfolio, given that the current VP Communications liaises a lot with the computer task force and with clubs and services already,” Leung said.  

The ERO, who acts as the signing officer for SUS sponsorship deals, has historically had far more responsibilities during the summer months than during the academic year. For this reason, Leung proposed that the position be moved to the portfolio of the VP External, whose work begins in the summer.

“We think that if this position were moved under the VP External, given the definition of the VP External, we think that they, in collaboration with whatever person they assign the role of taking care of sponsorship, would more efficiently manage [the job],” Leung said.

The newly-created VP Sustainability portfolio will manage a number of committees currently within the VP External’s portfolio, so as to allow the VP External to dedicate more time to other mandates.

“The VP Sustainability will continue to take care of the Equity Committee, the SUS Environmental Committee, and SUS mental health committee,” Leung said. “Those committees and this portfolio in general are necessary and highly valuable to the Society, and we have no intention of redacting any of those [commitments].”

For the most part, councillors responded well to the proposed amendments.

“I’m glad that we’re passing this, and I think that everything that’s being passed is being done with the best of intentions and is moving SUS in the right direction,” Executive Administrator Joseph DeCunha said.

 

Councillors present updates on upcoming social events

Council discussed a number of its upcoming social events, most notably the SUS’ 25th anniversay gala. The event has now been moved back a day to Feb. 9 to avoid overlap with the McGill Biology Student Union’s (MBSU) Darwin Day semi-formal, and will be held at Crew Collective & Café.

VP Academic Ellie Joung also reminded Council of SUS Academia Week, which will feature a number of free science and research-related events between Feb. 5 and 9.

“We have a talk from Dr. [Victoria] Kaspi on cosmology, a workshop on [The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada] NSERC funding for research abroad, and a talk on child psychiatry, [and a number of] lab tours,” Joung said.

VP Internal Soud Kharusi presented new details regarding the SUS ski trip, which will be held on the evening of Feb. 17 for Nuit Blanche. Tickets for Science and Non-Science students will be $50 and $65, respectively.

SUS General Council will next meet on Feb. 14.

Editorial, Opinion

Renaming buildings: One step toward a more inclusive campus

by McGill Tribune Editorial Board on

More in Editorial:

Recently, McGill struck the Working Group on Principles of Commemoration and Renaming. The group will develop guidelines to consider whether McGill should rename campus buildings that honour historical figures whose legacies no longer seem worth commemorating. As with any debate on how to best memorialize the past, the Task Force raises the question of whether to judge historical figures by today’s standards, and whether it is possible to recognize someone for one aspect of their legacy, while ignoring its darker components.

A group of black students at Princeton University made their positions on these questions clear, when they called on the university administration to change the name of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs in 2016. Wilson, former president of the United States and leader in the creation of the League of Nations, was also a racist and a segregationist. In refusing to change the name of the school, Princeton took the stance that it is possible to recognize a historical figure’s achievements while still reflecting on their flaws and wrongdoings.

It is crucial to recognize the reprehensible episodes from a community’s past, in order to learn from and to never repeat atrocities. However, oppressive historical figures no longer deserve to be held on a pedestal. Renaming buildings is an opportunity to—at least symbolically—recognize and confront inequality in the past, and the present. It also creates space for the celebration of new figures that better represent the McGill community’s values. Remembering the past matters, but so does honouring those individuals that we can take pride in today and in the future.

Stephen Leacock—former McGill professor and namesake of the Leacock Building—was a misogynist, and vocally opposed women’s suffrage. McGill’s own founder, James McGill, was a slave owner. While we cannot change the fact that these people played positive roles in shaping McGill, it is essential to acknowledge and affirm the standards of inclusivity and tolerance that we want reflected in McGill’s campus today.

Changing the name of the Leacock building or the Le James bookstore incurs little substantive loss in pragmatic terms, but has the potential for large symbolic gain. Renaming such buildings would spark important historical reflection and dialogue surrounding McGill’s past, and the people that were part of it. The building could be re-christened with the name of someone who better reflects McGill students on campus today, and whose legacy serves to promote equality rather than impede it.

Renaming buildings is an opportunity to—at least symbolically—recognize and confront inequality in the past, and the present.

Trailblazing women, people of colour, and other minorities and their accomplishments have long been overlooked and ignored in the past, due to oppressive social structures that silenced their identities and actively discriminated against them. This cannot be fixed, and should never be forgotten, but changing a building name does not in itself erase history. Instead, it can serve to celebrate those who were not historically recognized, or those who have contributed exceptionally to the university’s more recent past. It is crucial that the institution—and the role models it publicly recognizes—are representative and inclusive of the whole student population.

That said, symbolic change cannot be mistaken for substantive change. While changing the name of the building creates the appearance of greater tolerance and sensitivity, tangible progress toward making campus a more inclusive space for all students means matching that symbolic commitment with concrete action. McGill has a ways to go when it comes to inclusivity and representation on campus, and achieving equality clearly requires more than renaming buildings. However, critically reflecting on the names that McGill places on pedestals—and choosing to commemorate those that more accurately represent our community’s values—is a welcome start.

By the same logic, as a part of its mandate, the Working Group must seriously consider whether it is time to discuss renaming our university entirely. Clearly, changing McGill’s name would incur many financial and practical costs beyond the straightforward act of replacing the plaque on the Leacock Building. Nevertheless, it is a conversation that needs to be had. Even if the possibility of renaming is put to bed, it is important to reflect on the legacy of our founder holistically. James McGill created an institution that, today, provides students from a range of countries with incredible educational opportunities. The University’s reputation is now based on the McGill community’s academic achievements, rather than those of its founder. But, he also participated in the enslavement of black and Indigenous people, and must be remembered for all aspects of his character.

The name “McGill” has come to represent much more than its founder, to millions of people. McGill is a community that purports to welcome a diverse group of students and perspectives. It is known internationally for its academic leadership. This is not thanks to James McGill, but rather to the students and faculty that now study and work here. McGill should do justice to its community by ensuring that the institution’s structures promote a progressive and inclusive vision for the future.

 

 

@mcgilltribop | [email protected]
Out on the Town, Student Life

“Snowga”: Weekend outdoor yoga lessons attract crowds to local Montreal parks

by Tali Zuckerman on

More in Out on the Town:

Come winter, the average Montrealer can be found partaking in common outdoor activities such as skiing, skating, and sledding. But snow yoga, a newcomer to the scene also known as “snowga”, is on the rise, vying for a spot as one of the city’s most popular winter sports. Each Saturday and Sunday from Jan. 13 to Mar. 18, crowds of people gather in parks La Fontaine and Laurier to brave the freezing temperatures and partake in this shockingly relaxing activity.

“Snowga,” as instructor Melissa Ciampanelli explains, is the name given to yoga performed outside in the snow. It is taught by Pop Spirit, a “virtual yoga studio” in which owner Marie-Ève Bertrand uses public spaces, such as parks and waterfronts, to lead public groups in physical activities like yoga and stand-up paddle boarding.

“[Bertrand] started Pop Spirit seven years ago, and she started Snowga five years ago,” Ciampanelli said. “[Snowga] comes from Colorado. When [Bertrand] heard of that she said ‘Oh, I think people in Montreal would like that!’”

Apparently, she was right. According to Ciampanelli, morning snowga lessons consistently attract a crowd of 50 “snowgis”.

Although Bertrand’s original vision was to start the free “Snowga” classes simply for fun, their quick success enticed Bertrand to pitch the activity to the Montreal government for funding.  

“When she approached the city of Montreal they actually thought it was a pretty good idea, so they’re even sending her here [and] paying her to do this, which is cool because she just wanted to do it for fun,” Ciampanelli said.

Each Snowga class lasts approximately 40 minutes, as a Pop Spirit instructor leads participants, each with their own yoga mat, through classic yoga moves such as sun salutations, tree pose, and child’s pose. Partakers of the sport typically prepare for the cold by wearing a warm winter coat, comfortable pants, waterproof gloves, and snow boots. At the end of the class, yoga enthusiasts finish off the session with a two-minute relaxation period lying down on the snowy ground.

Although many traditional yoga positions cannot be performed when wearing bundles of warm winter clothing, Snowga incorporates many diverse yoga positions, such as mountain pose and triangle pose, in order to introduce the practice to those trying it for the first time.

“It’s kind of a sample of what yoga is, just to give people that desire to start practicing yoga, to get them to move around and you know, [get] addicted to it,” Ciampanelli said. “It’s just passing on the joy of yoga.”

Just like with most styles of yoga, the goal of Snowga is to get in touch with one’s body and exercise in a low-impact and meditative way. Snowga, however, has an additional central aim: To encourage people to go outdoors to get some exercise while enjoying the beautiful winter landscape, regardless of the temperature.

“The goal is to get people outside,” Ciampanelli said. “[It is] for people to come to the park and enjoy winter, because we enjoy summer, but we don’t always enjoy winter.”

Features

Yes, she can

by Selwynne Hawkins on

More in Features:

On Feb. 9, the Olympic Torch will complete its journey to the PyeongChang Olympic Stadium for the 2018 Winter Olympics Opening Ceremony. For the 16 days that follow, millions of Canadians, from as far as 9,000 km and 10 time zones away, will tune in to support the world’s best winter athletes. Among the viewers are a generation of girls who, if previous years are any indication, will walk away with full hearts and imaginations.

 

Every year, the Olympic Games face warranted criticism; they’re wasteful and frivolous, and place excessive strain on host cities and nations. For all of their flaws, however, the Olympic Games remain unmatched in one area: Their ability to inspire for young girls and women. The Games provide a perfect storm of national pride, compelling female athletic journeys, and incredible performances. They’re perfectly suited for casual viewers, as the high-visibility and event diversity make the Games an accessible introduction to a wide variety of sports—and the wealth of women competing in them.

 

Nachi Fujimoto, a diminutive defender on Les Canadiennes de Montréal, hails from an unlikely hockey hometown: Sapporo, Japan. Hockey flies far below the radar in Japan, and the Olympics provide key coverage—alerting young people to opportunities in lesser-known sports.

 

“In the Sochi Olympics [in 2014], the Japanese women’s team qualified, and hockey gained popularity,” Fujimoto said in an interview with ///The McGill Tribune///, translated from Japanese*. “Before then, some people knew about the sport, but sports like baseball and soccer [were] much more popular. But when the Olympics came around, hockey gained popularity.”

 

Beyond simply exposing viewers to new experiences, the Olympics provide a unique opportunity to connect with positive female role models. With each iteration of the Olympic Games, a new set of heroines emerges from the sporting elite. The international success of women like Hayley Wickenheiser, Clara Hughes, and Christine Sinclair’s encourages new participants to try their respective sports. Strong female athletes play a vital role in encouraging girls to get involved in athletics, and this relationship can be leveraged to maximize benefits for young women.

Horoscopes, Student Life

The Tribune Predicts: February Horoscopes

by Miguel Principe on

More in Horoscopes:

 

 

Aquarius: January 20 – February 18

 

Happy Birthday, Aquarius! This month, Mars is oriented toward your sun, meaning you should pay close attention to your friends. Play a positive role in their lives by tagging them in relatable Facebook memes and sticking by their side. One day, they’ll return the favour, and you’ll be glad you were there for them all along.

 

 

 

 

 

Pisces: February 19 – March 20

This month, your ambition in pursuing a heavy course load and many extracurriculars may become overwhelming, Pisces. Take time to prioritize your activities—including self-care—and you will succeed in all areas of life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aries: March 21 – April 19

Aries, lately you’ve become bored with the status quo. Luckily, the lunar eclipse that occurred on Jan. 31 will give you the opportunity to change things up this month. Try out a new club or activity with your friends. But keep an eye out for Cupid, because around Feb. 6 or 7, you may find a love interest in an unexpected place like a samosa sale in McConnell Engineering, or during a drunken encounter at Cafe Campus.

 

 

 

Taurus: April 20 – May 20

The recent lunar moon will create conflict in your place of residence, Taurus. You and your roommate will be at odds about something in the household, whether it is their lack of understanding that dirty dishes do not clean themselves or their inability to respect your sleeping schedule. Try your best not to get too frustrated—you two will figure things out soon, possibly on the solar eclipse of Feb. 15.

 

 

 

 

Gemini: May 21 to June 20

Gemini, instead of spending all your time getting trashed on St-Laurent—as social Geminis tend to be inclined to do—spend the week of Feb. 10 applying for job and internship opportunities for this summer, as Leo signals that this will be crucial for your future. If you’re having difficulty with a course, now is the perfect time to go to office hours and talk to your professor about how you can improve—you’ll thank yourself later.

 

 

 

Cancer: June 21 to July 22

If you failed to start your New Year’s resolutions last month, don’t worry: January was just a free trial. This month, you will feel optimistic—a trait skeptics like you, Cancer, rarely display. Take advantage of your excitement to explore the city, try out a new winter sport like Snowga, or attend that house party you’ve been itching to go to.

 

 

 

 

Leo: July 23 – August 22

This is going to be the most romantic month of 2018 for you, Leo. If you’re in a relationship, you will be taking things to a new level this month. If you’re single, you may fall hard for an ex—whether this rekindling occurs through a late-night text or an accidental bump-in at Leacock, however, remains to be seen.

 

 

 

 

 

Virgo: August 23 – September 22

This month, you should focus on a hobby that makes you happy, such as playing guitar or coding. If you’re experiencing the infamous “quarter-life” crisis, Virgo, this month you will find a sense of purpose for all that you are currently doing. You’ll become more motivated in your hobbies (and classes) than ever.

 

 

 

 

Libra: September 23 – October 22

The lunar eclipse means that you will make new acquaintances and friends at any social event you may attend. No matter how awkward, all those faculty wine and cheeses or meetings for new clubs you’re trying out will be worth going to. Don’t get too distracted by these new friends though, Libra—you still need to study for midterms!

 

 

 

 

Scorpio: October 23 – November 21

As midterms approach, your stars are joined by Venus and Mercury, meaning that while it’s best to focus on studying, you’ll find extra value in taking a break this month. Make sure to call up that special someone, be it a friend or a romantic interest, for a relaxing day spent watching Netflix and eating rocky road ice cream.

 

 

 

Sagittarius: November 22 – December 21

First and foremost, make sure to follow your instincts this month, Sagittarius. The stars are in alignment, meaning that many new opportunities are coming your way. Make sure not to overcommit, as you will regret this in the future and end up burning out in McLennan and re-evaluating your life choices.

 

 

 

 

Capricorn: December 22 to January 19

Get ready to be intimate this month, Capricorn. Venus and Pisces are in harmony on Feb. 10, which means that if you’re single and ready to mingle, you and one of your close friends will finally move your relationship to the next level. But if you’re cuffed, beware of the solar eclipse in Aquarius on Feb. 15, which suggests that you, your significant other, and your friends may clash in some way.

Basketball, Men's Varsity, Sports

Seeing red: Redmen basketball take down Rouge et Or

by Ender McDuff and Gabe Nisker on

More in Basketball:

A statement win on Feb. 1 kept the McGill Redmen basketball team (9-2) firmly in first place of the RSEQ, as they downed the second-place Université Laval Rouge et Or (6-4) in decisive fashion by a score of 103-81.

Utilizing their deep bench and array of sharpshooters, the Redmen broke the 100-point mark for the fourth time this season. Fourth-year centre Noah Daoust led the way with 24 points and nine rebounds.

Fans crowding Love Competition Hall were treated to a back-and-forth first quarter. The Rouge et Or countered every Redmen basket, resulting in a total of 11 lead changes. McGill’s run and gun tempo clashed with Laval’s intense, athletic full court press, but the scoreboard at the end of the first frame read in McGill’s favour, 23-20.

“We knew it was going to be a dogfight,” Redmen Head Coach David DeAveiro said.

Introducing a formidable zone defence early in the second quarter, Laval tried to swing the game in their direction. The first McGill possession of the frame ended in a shot clock violation that had the Laval bench on its feet. However, next time down the floor, fifth-year Redmen guard Dele Ogundokun drained one of his four threes en route to 20 points on the night, sparking a 15-4 McGill run. McGill entered halftime up 48-37.

A fresh McGill team came out of the halftime gate with a pair of back-to-back three pointers. By the time Laval called its first timeout after yet another McGill three, the Redmen lead had been extended to 25 points—the game’s largest margin.

“[You] just keep going, wave after wave, and eventually they’ll wear down,” fourth-year guard Alex Paquin said.

Laval withstood McGill’s pressure in the third period, cutting the Redmen lead to 19 by the end of the frame. The Rouge et Or carried the same energy into the fourth, and forced DeAveiro to call a quick timeout to re-gather his Redmen. But the aggressive Rouge et Or didn’t let up, slashing the lead to eight points.

“We struggled, we just couldn’t get a stop […] but sometimes you just have to grind it out,” DeAveiro said. “You dig your heels in and say OK, we’re just going to see what happens and run our stuff and defend.”

A trio of critical three-pointers from Ogundokun and one from Daoust with five minutes left put an end to any Laval comeback hopes once and for all, restoring a comfortable lead for McGill.

“I’m in my fifth year, I’ve been here a while, so these are situations that I’ve been through,” Ogundokun said. “[These are] times that the veteran guys can step up for the young guys [who] might be struggling.”

Fellow fifth-year Francois Bourque added 10 points and seven rebounds in the Redmen winning effort, while Laval’s Frantson Demosthene led the way for the Rouge et Or with 22 points and eight rebounds.

On Feb. 3, the Redmen ventured into Rouge et Or territory for the second half of the home-and-away series. The Redmen, spurred on by 44 combined points from Ogundokun, Daoust, and fifth-year guard Jenning Leung, downed the Rouge et Or 68-61. McGill’s next home game is on Feb. 17, when they will host the Bishop’s University Gaiters.

 

Moment of the Game

After Laval cut McGill’s lead down to eight points in the fourth quarter, fifth-year guard and team co-captain Dele Ogundokun drained back-to-back threes with six minutes remaining to secure McGill’s victory.

 

Quotable

“We can’t be content with every lead. Even going into halftime, we had a lead but going into the new half, it’s 0-0. We just gotta keep pushing it. And we know that 20 points can go to 10 points real quick, so we try to push 20 to 30 and keep the lead going.” – Fifth-year guard Dele Ogundokun on closing out games and putting an end to the Laval comeback

 

Stat Corner

Shooting from distance played a key role in this battle—McGill hit 15 three-pointers on 38 attempts, while Laval only connected on three of their 20 attempts.

1 … 592 593 594 595 596 … 1,367

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue