Latest News

It's meandyou
Art, Arts & Entertainment

Instagram, politics, and the fashion of feminism

by Evelyn Goessling on

More in Art:

Contemporary artists have long been at the forefront of social and aesthetic change. Art, fashion, music, film, dance, and intersections across all genres have become even more of a melting pot of influence through the ease of connection over social media. The new wave of socio-cultural activism that spans art, fashion, and music is greatly indebted to Instagram and Tumblr for its popularity and poignancy. 

Social activism is imbued within the fashion of our generation: Androgynous and unisex styles, oversized clothing, and gender blending outfits. Clothing is a way of demonstrating changes in society’s understanding of gender identity, objectification, gaze, and body autonomy. A few small designers have taken to Instagram almost exclusively to promote, network, and sell their designs. This is a business model that reflects what today’s youth seem to care about more and more: socially conscious and relevant products. 

Me and You is one brand that has seen success following this model. Headed by Maayan Toledo and Julia Baylis, Me and You is known for their simple white and pink underwear with “feminist” written proudly on the back. Other popular products are “feminist” and “bad bitch” nameplate necklaces and sweatshirts with “Don’t Touch” emblazoned across the front. The brand maintains a soft, feminine aesthetic (lots of baby pink and cursive script) while commenting on the way marketing and consumption is intertwined with the patriarchal male gaze. 

A large part of this commentary comes from the brand’s many collaborations and association with other feminist and activist figures. The brand communicates intersectionality through their work with models such as Barbara Ferreira and Diana Veras. Both models have a large social media presence and use this platform to discuss the lack of representation of people from all walks of life, across the spectrum of body type, sexuality, and race. 

Maayan Toledo and Julia Baylis are just two out of hundreds of artists, mostly based in New York City, whose work deals with these issues. Petra Collins and Grace Micelli (aka artbabygirl on Instagram) are widely known for their feminist-focused art and clothing production (in the case of the latter). Amandla Stenberg, Hari Nef, Jazz Jennings, Jaden Smith, and Sanam Sindhi are just a few other figures whose work is essentially involved in changing the cultural landscape through social media. 

It’s not news to say that Instagram has become an indispensible tool for the liberal and politically-conscious movements sweeping across North America and the world. Feminism, Black Lives Matter, the Bernie Sanders campaign, and Queer and Trans People of Color’s rights have expanded in scope and visibility thanks to Instagram. These movements have become an accessory, a component in the millennial aesthetic. Political correctness and a socially conscious attitude are just as trendy as mom jeans and Adidas Superstar shoes. Self-expression in fashion has simply expanded to include an implicit declaration of personal politics, and that’s not a bad thing at all. In fact, it’s a welcome new change.

 

 

@kaochengkai in the "Vacation Twill Jacket" from my @printalloverme collaboration 🌹

A photo posted by Grace Miceli (@artbabygirl) on

 

Grace Micelli (@artbabygirl)’s illustrations and clothing appropriates a juvenile style and pop culture iconography as a celebration of the everyday millennial: Someone unaligned with gender norms and unsatisfied with the drabness of today’s styles. Micelli’s kitschy and feminine aesthetic spices ubiquitous American Apparel-style basics, creating a norm core look that is anything but normal. 

 

 

A photo posted by @its_meandyou on

 

Artist Arvida Bystrom (@arvidabystrom) models the “feminist” underwear by Me and You. Self- love and radical feminism are common themes amongst Me and You’s collaborators, models, and photographers. iPhones, selfie sticks, and Macbooks covered with stickers are typical props in many photos, illustrating how this particular feminist aesthetic has manifested itself in the age of personal communication technologies. 

 

 

A photo posted by Olivier Zahm (@ozpurple) on

 

@myfriendpaige and @juliettelabelle (via @ozpurple) pose with shirts from Bernie Barbie, an unofficial Bernie Sanders merchandiser. Bernie Barbie donates 40 per cent of their proceeds to Planned Parenthood. The stylized shirts characterize the Bernie ‘brand’ as pro-feminist and pro-sexuality while co-opting the trendiness of Bernie Sanders and democratic socialism.

Science & Technology

Move aside elephants—birds are the smartest non-primates

by Daniel Galef on

More in Science & Technology:

Footage from a revolutionary behavioural experiment showed non-primates making and using tools just like humans. In the video, a crow is trying to get food out of a narrow vessel, but its beak is too short for it to reach through the container. Nearby, the researchers placed a straight wire, which the crow bent against a nearby surface into a hook. Then, holding the hook in its beak, it fished the food from the bottle.

Corvids—the family of birds that includes crows, ravens, rooks, jackdaws, and jays—are pretty smart overall. Although not to the level of parrots and cockatoos, ravens can also mimic human speech. They also have a highly developed system of communication and are believed to be among the most intelligent non-primate animals in existence.

McGill Professor Andrew Reisner recalls meeting a graduate student studying corvid intelligence at Oxford University when these results were first published in 2015. 

“I had read early in the year that some crows had been observed making tools, and I mentioned this to him,” Reisner explained. “He said that he knew about that, as it had been he who had first observed it happening. Evidently the graduate students took turns watching the ‘bird box,’ […]  and the tool making first occurred there on his shift.”

One of the biggest milestones in intelligence not strictly related to ‘smarts’ is self-awareness and self-recognition. If an individual creature is sentient enough to comprehend itself as an entity and understand the implications, scientists can consider it sentient on a higher level than creatures that, however clever, have no sense of self.

One popular method to test this is called the ‘Mirror Test,’ which attempts to analyze animals’ behaviour when faced with their own reflection, to determine whether they interpret the image as another animal or if the image is understood as a representation of the original.

A number of animals have been observed interacting with their reflection in such a way that scientists believe they have a true sense of self—among them a few different birds, including the magpie (Pica pica). This means different things for different animals: In the case of the magpies, birds were shown to be able to identify the location of a dot placed on them when they were able to see themselves in a mirror, but not by touch or when the dot was of the same color as their feathers.

We assumed that you can’t be good at everything. It seems that in this case, the urban birds [do] have it all.

This test is not perfect—among its criticisms is that it tests only a limited and specific set of conditions. For example, dogs rely primarily on smell and hearing, with much less sensory input coming from vision, so they may process the data differently.

The use of tools is another important marker for intelligence. Very few animals can commandeer resources from their environment, using specially shaped rocks or sticks as extensions of the body in order to complete an otherwise impossible task. It is considered one of the major steps in human evolution, but has now been observed in a number of other species—mainly primates—but also elephants, dolphins, and some octopuses.

A variety of birds have been recorded using tools, including woodpeckers and Egyptian vultures; however, only one family of animals has also been known to do something no other animal, other than a human has ever been known to do: Manufacture their own tools. In the study related at the beginning of this article, New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) were shown to be able to adapt elements of their environment into tools they could then use—for example, bending a length of wire into a long hook of just the right shape to free a morsel of food from a closed container.

McGill University has its own place in the history of animal intelligence, as well. Dr. T Wesley Mills, a turn-of-the-century McGill physiologist, wrote a book on the subject: The Nature and Development of Animal Intelligence (1898). A century later, our university is still a hotspot for new developments.

McGill’s Bellairs Research Institute in Barbados just published a study detailing a dramatic difference in intelligence between rural and urban birds, indicating that city birds, who spend most of their lives around humans and human activity, pick up some street smarts from their environment. Some of which include boosted immunity and problem-solving skills, which usually do not correlate. 

“We assumed that you can’t be good at everything,” Jean-Nicolas Audet, one of the authors of the study in the journal Behavioral Ecology said. “It seems that in this case, the urban birds [do] have it all.”

Further study is always being carried out at the McGill biology department’s Lefebvre laboratory. Professor Louis Lefebvre has also studied bird intelligence extensively, and has determined the Japanese carrion crow (Corvus corone) to be the smartest he’s studied. Since 1994, Lefebvre and his students have studied over 500 distinct species of birds, with a special eye toward remarkable learning innovations in feeding patterns. This includes how tits, a type of bird, have been observed learning how to open milk bottles. He’s also studied how crows in cities with traffic lights have learned to interpret the light colour as a signal of precisely where and when to drop nuts on the crosswalk so that they will be cracked by automobiles and also when it is safe to retrieve them afterward.

2,500 years ago, the Greek storyteller Aesop observed the fascinatingly intelligent feeding patterns of birds, especially crows. Today, these birds continue to show that they’re a lot smarter than we tend to give them credit for. 

Science & Technology

The epidemic of the HIV/AIDS stigma

by Clare Fogarty on

More in Science & Technology:

“It’s a hard three letters to absorb. It’s a turning point in one’s life,” was how Charlie Sheen described his diagnosis with HIV in an interview with NewsTalk.

After revealing his illness in December of last year, Sheen faced multiple lawsuits from ex-sexual partners claiming he didn’t inform them of his infection. In both the United States and Canada, it’s a criminal offence to be HIV-positive and have sex with someone without informing them of their diagnosis.

For much of the HIV-positive population, infection remains an unspoken secret. Diagnosis with HIV was nearly a death sentence during its peak outbreaks in the 1980s. Today, the disease can be well-treated and controlled. Through what’s known as cocktail antiviral drug therapy, patients are administered a variety of drugs that greatly lower viral load—the number of virus particles in the body—and reduce infectivity. HIV infects and kills important immune cells called T cells, often leading to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and thus allowing opportunistic infections to thrive; however, many HIV-positive patients are now able to live normal lives, with their status never progressing to AIDS. 

Still, the stigma associated with HIV/AIDS persists. In North America, infection continues to be associated with death, despite the landmarks made in antiviral therapy. HIV infection also remains attached to taboo topics, like homosexual sex and intravenous drug use, and is often therefore associated with irresponsibility or moral fault. Although HIV has been shown to spread primarily through heterosexual sex, infection also continues to be associated with homosexual behaviour. 

Unfortunately, this stigma is not just a sociological phenomenon; it has huge impacts on the epidemiology of the virus. Dr. Mark Wainberg, director of the McGill University AIDS Centre explained that one of the primary hurdles in ending the HIV epidemic is getting people to come forward for testing.

Identify 90 per cent of people who are positive, treat 90 per cent of those, and bring 90 per cent of those who are treated to non-detectability of viral load (making them non-infectious). The attainment of the initial 90 per cent goal will be by far the most difficult.

“Studies have shown that a majority of at-risk individuals in some countries [like the UK] don’t know they are infected because they have never been tested,” Wainberg said. “This is probably due to the perceived stigma attached to an HIV diagnosis.”

As of 2014, the Public Health Agency of Canada stated that one in five HIV-positive Canadians were unaware that they had HIV. This represents approximately 16,000 Canadians who could be effectively treated, and countless others who could avoid infection. 

Lowering viral load through therapy can prevent HIV transmission; however, doctors cannot begin treatment unless they know who is infected.

“The WHO [World Health Organization] has established 90-90-90 guidelines to be accomplished by 2020,” Wainberg explained. “Identify 90 per cent of people who are positive, treat 90 per cent of those, and bring 90 per cent of those who are treated to non-detectability of viral load (making them non-infectious). The attainment of the initial 90 per cent goal will be by far the most difficult.” 

To meet this goal, Wainberg proposes paying people to be tested, as a means of incentivizing them. An additional way to promote diagnosis rates may be to combat the stigma associated with the disease. Either way, it is clear that proper awareness of the modern HIV/AIDS epidemic is vital, as this stigma may be one of the most dangerous epidemics of our time.

McGill Gym
Martlets, Men's Varsity, Sports

Explaining the Athletics Fee

by Zikomo Smith on

More in Martlets:

All McGill students, whether they are varsity athletes or not, pay the McGill Athletics and Recreation Fee. Full time undergraduate students pay $130.83 a term, and part-time students pay $79.13. Undergraduate students also contribute to the Athletics and Recreation Facilities Improvement Fee. The Athletics and Recreation fee is one of the largest student fees, and it caused controversy among members of the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) in 2013 when Athletics asked for a fee increase. Little public information exists on exactly how the fee operates, and how it benefits McGill Athletics and the wider McGill student population

McGill Athletics and Recreation fee

McGill Athletics and Recreation has an overall operating budget dedicated to the running of various programs, maintaining and running their various facilities and programs, and paying staff salaries. According to Philip Quintal, interim executive director of McGill Athletics and Recreation, the McGill Athletics and Recreation Fee contributes 64 per cent of the revenue stream that goes directly into the operating budget, which is then used to carry out Athletics’ general operations.

“The athletics fee, as our other revenues do, [contributes] to the day to day, overall running of our Athletics and Recreation operations,” Quintal explained. “It helps us with our programming, with our facilities, our maintenance issues [….] Right now, our net gains from […] our athletics fee is roughly just a little over $7 million.”

McGill Athletics also provides a number of jobs for students. The Athletics fee contributes to the payroll for university students to work.

“We have always tried to […] provide work opportunities for our McGill university students,” Quintal explained. “[That] goes hand in hand with running [Athletics’] programs and opening our building to our students.”

Other sources of revenue for the operating budget

McGill Athletics has revenue streams outside of the Athletics fee. Athletics works throughout the year to ensure that they are getting enough revenue to fund their facilities and operations.

“If you were just to take our payroll, our full time staff, our full time payroll, and you took the money to run all of our buildings […] only those two factors combined are right around $9 million,” Quintal explained. “We have to have a very good plan put forward to try and generate revenues to keep the place running […]  there are many other things that contribute towards that budget [for example] buying equipment, the travel of some of our teams.”

Part of this additional revenue comes from renting out facilities, selling gym memberships and providing services and programs to the general public and students alike. Members of the public pay $76 a month for access to the sports complex and fitness centre while undergraduate McGill students pay $32 a semester for access to the fitness centre.

“We sell memberships, students pay fees to participate in intramural programs,” Quintal said. “If you take a fitness and recreation course, there is a fee to participate in that course […] we sell a small fitness centre membership that we collect from our students.”

McGill also makes money from varsity sports on game day by selling tickets and refreshments. On these days, you can also see some of Athletics’ corporate sponsors, such as Dominos Pizza, or Peel Pub.

“We got out and we try as much as possible to market some of our programs so that we have corporate sponsorships on the outside,” Quintal said.

According to Doug Sweet, director of internal communications at McGill, Athletics also receives money from the Quebec government but no funds from the operating budget are earmarked for Athletics

“McGill receives $2.5 million per year from the government of Quebec for services to students,” Sweet wrote in an email to the Tribune. “[Seventy-five] per cent of that goes to Student Services; 25 per cent goes to Athletics. McGill’s central operating budget does not contribute to Athletics.”

“[We] also have a transfer from the university that helps to cover the fact that we […] [house] the [Department] of Kinesiology and Physical Education […] [as well as] housing exams,” Quintal said. “That fee over the years has been reduced, but there is still a fee towards that.”

Why would Student fees increase?

In 2014 the McGill Athletics and Recreation fee increased to account for various rising costs.

“Energy costs always go up,” Quintal explained. “Salaries, whether they are mandated by collective agreements, whether it is university salary policy, [increase]. The maintenance of our facilities, because some of our facilities are older, […]require more and more financial input.”

For the Athletics fee to increase, a referendum question must be brought to the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Legislative Council.

“Our Internal Regulations […] say that if the University wants to increase an ancillary fee, I […] am obligated to bring a motion for a referendum question to Legislative Council,” wrote Zachariah Houston, SSMU vice-president (VP) Finance, in an email to the Tribune. “The Legislative Council would then decide whether or not to send the question to referendum [….] I will note that in recent years, Council has always decided to put questions on increases to ancillary fees forward to referendum and allow the SSMU membership at large to decide.”

The Athletics & Recreation Facilities Improvement fee

This fee, renewed in 2014, is separate from the primary Athletics and Recreation Fee and does not contribute to Athletics’ operating budget. Instead it is earmarked is for the improvement of athletics facilities for McGill Students. According to Quintal, students contribute $432,000 a year to this fee, a figure matched by the University.

“[Some] examples of the athletic improvement fee over the last little while [are] changing the turf on Molson Stadium,” Quintal said. “We are […] putting in a new surface [on Forbes Field]. We are also doing a face lift on our tennis courts [….] [Recently], the expansion of our Fitness Centre and the addition of the mezzanine level with […] additional equipment […] came from [the improvement] fee.”

According to Houston, SSMU is not involved in the decisions regarding the use of the improvement fee.

“In terms of involvement, the SSMU is not actively involved in decisions regarding the use of the fee–since the fee is a McGill fee, the revenue does not go through the SSMU,” Houston said.

Communication with students

McGill Athletics and Recreation aims to consult students to improve its services.

“We are always trying to communicate with the students,” Quintal explained. “In some of our advisory board meetings […] it came forward to us that students needed more space to meet to study […] we redesigned [the mezzanine of Tomlinson Hall] with some new tables where groups of students can meet.”

Athletics also sends out an annual survey to varsity athletes asking about satisfaction with the various Athletics services.

According to Houston, Athletics has not reached out to SSMU this year for consultation.

“During my term, McGill Athletics has not reached out to SSMU for student opinions regarding the use of the Athletics and Recreation Facilities Improvement Fee, nor the Athletics Fee,” Houston wrote. “Of course, I cannot speak to whether or not they have done consultation with SSMU in the past. Also, we do receive a monthly report with some very minimal information regarding how the Athletics and Recreation Facilities Improvement Fee is being used.”

Looking forward

Although its implementation has not been very well publicized, the student fee is an integral part of Athletics and Recreation. As budget cuts continue to hit Quebec universities, these fees may become topics of discussion once more. It is important that students understand both how their fees are being used and the avenues through which McGill Athletics and Recreation engages student needs and wants.

Art, Arts & Entertainment

Art Matters 2016 showcased student art throughout Montreal

by Morgan Davis on

More in Art:

The Art Matters festival has been running every year since 2000, and continues to offer art exhibits in various mediums to showcase the diversity of Montreal’s art community. The festival is completely undergraduate-student run and put on by Concordia University throughout the month of March. Displayed at different locations throughout the city, Art Matters 2016 was a collection of various mediums such as painting, photography, and a series of talks and workshops offered by professional artists. Providing emerging artists and curators the opportunity to develop their practices and promote their work, the festival creates a line of communication between the artists of Concordia University and the city of Montreal.

One of the exhibits, Stories We Tell was a collection of pieces by several artists that brings forward the question of why we enjoy looking at photos of other families. Constructed through our own childhood memories, our perception of family life originates in the remembered realities of our ancestors. Nostalgia, memories, and romanticizing the past all paint the pictures we choose to remember. By exploring the different perspectives in which these pictures may be observed, Stories We Tell allows the viewer to reflect on their own personal family histories.

A particular piece included in the Stories We Tell collection is Concordia student-artist Jeremy Blinkhorn’s “Atrophy-Life.” The artwork consisted of photographs from the artist’s own family that capture the essence of his grandfather’s life, whose memories were stolen by dementia. A vintage machine projected images that subtly captured his grandfather, as he is never directly included in any. Either in backgrounds, turned away, or taking the photo himself, Blinkhorn’s grandfather is simultaneously absent from the photographs and yet the subject of the piece. The piece embodies the memories of the man who could no longer remember them himself.

[metaslider id=44401]

For an exhibit that focused on past generations and a time before the age of computers, the collection’s pieces incorporated technology in a surprising way. One piece was viewable through a small slit in a box where within was a theatre of home videos. Across the gallery a screen was attached to the wall where photographs from the sixties and seventies were transformed into moving imagery. The stationary tradition of a photograph was thrown out the window with this piece as one viewed a statuesque young girl trapped in time become bent in a way that allows her to move through the motionless background and out of the frame. The television moved through a collection of pictures that continued through this same pattern, each becoming more and more obscure and fantastical. A unique idea of photographic manipulation, the artist succeeded in reimagining the past and encouraging the viewers to do the same. The exhibit collectively leaves the audience nostalgic and reflective. By seeing the memories and personal possessions of other families one still feels close to those individuals within the bounds of a withered photograph. Despite the distance of time, a connection was made between the art and the viewer.

Another collection included in this year’s Art Matters was Concr(éte), curated by Ashley Zvervolel. Concr(éte) used the definition of concrete as something being real or solid; not abstract. The exhibit itself consisted of a humble few pieces, the issue being that it was difficult to differentiate what is an actual aspect of the exhibit. A small room’s walls were dressed in the images of a green lush forest making the viewer feel immersed within the naturalistic scene. The centre of the room was occupied by a 10 foot piece of folded paper folded into a concrete coloured snake, initially appearing stable and strong yet upon closer inspection is seen to be made of simple grey construction paper that may potentially be moved or altered. The meaning behind the piece was not easy to find or understand, yet through further research within the exhibit’s pamphlet exhibit-goers can learn that the piece is meant to embody the illusion of stability and strength. It’s difficult to withhold skepticism when viewing the art of this collection. One piece was as simplistic as a green plastic planter filled with dead branches and tiny stems of flowers.

Laurence Herviuex-Gosselin’s Nothing Ever Happens Here was a collection of three photographs that was produced while the artist was in L’Avenir, Quebec, and served to be purposely ambiguous. Consisting of a photo of a dog, a house, and a farm scene, the photographic series played on a continuous loop within the gallery, overlooking the surrounding pieces. As a whole, Concr(éte) explored the idea of human environments and the relationships with the natural world. While the pieces may be appreciated separately, the joint viewing failed to see the true intention of the exhibition.

Stay Awhile was a collective piece that intended to make its viewer uncomfortable. Curated by Olivia Rose Mansveld, the word to be associated with this installation is “nidificate [verb]: To build a nest.” The interactive piece explored the nesting behaviours of humans and the material evidence that said behaviours leave behind. Entering a darkened staircase hidden behind a side door of Boulevard Saint-Laurent, the exhibit initially presented itself as a regular apartment complex. The pieces are collected and organized within one’s living space, further expressing the idea of observing nesting. Once inside the makeshift gallery it was difficult to decipher what was meant to be a part of the gallery and what wasn’t. The eleven pieces scattered within the apartment all serve individual meanings yet refer to the common purpose. Food in the kitchen was used to explore the themes of sexuality, desire, and consumption while exploring the idea of human tendency. Plasticine body parts served to express the trace of a past action while spread upon a chair and the surrounding floor of the living room. A curtain made completely of used cigarette butts reminds one of the differentiation between public and private zones and our willingness to engage in both. The urge to laugh uncomfortably followed the viewer the entire time they explored the open-aired apartment filled with aggressively purposed pieces, at times the impulse even became overwhelming.

The many exhibitions of this year’s Art Matters can serve to a variety of tastes and perspectives, and Stay Awhile will certainly not be forgotten. The thought-provoking pieces leave an impression, as well as the satisfaction of supporting young artists within Montreal.

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Has “How to Get Away with Murder” lost its pizazz?

by Melissa Dukefe on

More in Arts & Entertainment:

How to Get Away with Murder just finished its second season, and so far it is not at all impressive. What started as a ground-breaking and provocative television series is rapidly becoming mundane and vapid. This was expected, however, seeing as Shonda Rhimes is the executive producer of the show. Though Rhimes is deserving of respect and admiration for her creativity, she tends to go off tangent with her TV series as seen in shows like Scandal and /Grey’s Anatomy/. Hence, it is of little to no surprise that How to Get Away with Murder has taken a similar turn.

Despite the lacklustre season viewers had to endure for the past few months, people shouldn’t be too quick to condemn the show. It is worth noting that How to Get Away with Murder’s popularity stems from its successful first season which had an intricate yet riveting twist to it. During the first season, the plot was narrated in a non-linear fashion and heavily relied on flashbacks to make sense of the situation at hand. Featuring a reputable criminal defence attorney and law professor, Annalise Keating (Viola Davis) teaches a course on “How to Get Away with Murder” from which she selects five of her most competent students—Wes (Alfred Enoch), Michaela (Aja Naomi King), Connor (Jack Falahee), Asher (Matt McGorry), and Laurel (Karla Souza)—to come intern at her private firm. Every week, the interns work with one of Annalise’s clients and are usually given the tedious task of researching and carrying out important inquiries under the supervision of Annalise’s assistants, Bonnie (Liza Weil) and Frank (Charlie Weber). While the interns work on petty legal cases, the focus quickly shifts when Annalise gets mired in a criminal investigation when she finds out that her husband, Sam (Tom Verica), had an affair with one of his students whom they found dead. As a result, Annalise and her interns increasingly grow suspicious of Sam which ultimately leads to the involuntary manslaughter of the former by Annalise’s interns—making things all the more complicated. From that point onwards, the looming question seems to be: Will they get away with murder?

The concept of the show is brilliant, and had Rhimes delivered the second season like she did with the first, the show could have easily been topped among other phenomenal TV series such as House of Cards and Game of Thrones The underlying problem with season two of How to Get Away with Murder is its lack of structure. Unlike the first season, which had its events flow logically, the second seems to be all over the place and overwhelms the viewer with too much information. Moreover, the show introduced many forgettable characters this past season that detracted from the main plot of the show. Frankly, the season could have done without all the extras. Finally, it appears that Rhimes was more concerned about its characters’ love lives than the advancement of the plot itself. The multiple scenes of heated foreplay may have added an edge and enticed some viewers, but it was by no means necessary.

However, the upcoming season could still be good. The show can redeem itself and probably negate this review by coming back with the force with which it first started with back in season one. That being said, make sure not to set your expectations too high so as to avoid any kind of disappointment—a mistake that gets repeated when watching any one of Rhimes’ shows.

News, SSMU

SSMU Council passes Policy on Indigenous Solidarity

by Nick Jasinski on

More in News:

At its March 31 meeting, the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Legislative Council passed a comprehensive Policy on Indigenous Solidarity that lays out ways in which SSMU can pursue its social justice goals for indigenous students. In total, Council passed five motions updating executive job descriptions, amending SSMU’s child-care policy, updating procedures for electing CKUT representatives, changing the status of First Year Council (FYC) and adopting the new Policy on Indigenous Solidarity.

Motion regarding the Policy on Indigenous Solidarity

This policy aims to start to addressing issues of underrepresentation and misrepresentation that indigenous students at McGill face. SSMU Indigenous Affairs Coordinator Leslie Anne St. Amour was involved in writing the policy and was present at the meeting to outline the document and answer representatives’ questions.

“The policy includes consultation protocols for matters that have a direct impact on indigenous students at McGill, which is really important considering some of the struggles indigenous students have been having […] in the past few years,” St. Amour said, “[The policy includes] ways in which SSMU can support indigenous students, including access to status as a SSMU club, different ways to access the SSMU Building, [and] ways that SSMU can support indigenous communities to have input on SSMU events.”

Clubs and Services Councillor François-Paul Truc expressed his concern with the policy requirement that a Traditional Territory Acknowledgement be made before all SSMU-run events in addition to events hosted by SSMU clubs and services.

“We have clubs at McGill that are incredibly political—like Conservative-McGill political,” Truc said. “Are we really going to tell a political organization that has formed a club under SSMU […] that they now have to make a land acknowledgement that they do not agree with?”

St. Amour responded that she held public open consultation sessions both before and after the policy was drafted and had not received any such complaints.

“I had no feedback against this policy but I had a lot of feedback that was very pro this aspect of the policy, emphasizing the importance of this for indigenous students and indigenous student groups,” she said.

Motion regarding First Year Council restructuring

Council also passed a motion restructuring FYC that would move it from a SSMU service to the vice-president (VP) Internal Affairs portfolio and amending the SSMU internal regulations to reflect that fact. 

“SSMU service status […] isn’t the most appropriate for a student group that’s run by first years, which generally requires more support than a lot of our really autonomously run services,” VP Clubs and Services Kimber Bialik said. “The Internal Affairs portfolio […] has more space to take on additional projects and would also benefit from more representation from first-years.”

McGill, News

Divest McGill holds three day sit-in at James Administration Building

by Regina Wung on

More in McGill:

On March 29, Divest McGill set up camp at James Square and inside the James Administration Building to protest last week’s Board of Governors (BoG) decision for McGill not to divest from its holdings in fossil fuel companies, based on a report by the Committee to Advise [on] Matters of Social Responsibility (CAMSR). According to Divest McGill’s Facebook event, the sit-in will last until the afternoon of Thursday, March 31.

Divest McGill organized various activities to take place during the sit-in. The sit-in commenced with a rally in support of divestment, a Solidarity with Black Lives Matter Toronto gathering, and a candlelight vigil for climate justice. The agenda for March 30 included a teach-in for climate justice featuring speakers from McGill Faculty and Alumni for Divestment, a daily divest rally, a cypher for climate justice with Dan Parker, and a candlelight vigil for climate justice.

In its Facebook event, the group explained its motive.

“During this time, we would like to make space for other social justice campaigns to speak out against the ways that the McGill administration has made decisions that are not in line with the views of the greater community,” Divest McGill wrote. “We have a number of programming activities prepared for the next few days, and are prepared to stay until our demands are met.”

Antonina Scheer, U2 Earth Science and Economics and Divest McGill organizer, clarified the reasons behind the decision to sit-in.

“We wanted to do something a little different than just doing another petition—although we’ll probably do that also because we’re not going anywhere,” Scheer said. “[A sit-in] happened in September, but it has to happen again. We have to play the role of activists and push a bit harder and just create pressure.”

Student’s Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) External Emily Boytinck criticized the lack of administrative pathways to pursue divestment.

“I have personally been involved with the campaign over three years now, and can attest to the fact that in that time we have completely exhausted the administrative channels, leaving us no choice but to escalate our tactics,” Boytinck said.

According to Boytinck, the sit-in has already produced a response from the university administration.

“On Tuesday, we spoke to Michael Di Grappa, Olivier Marcil, Susan Aberman, and Andre Costopoulos, since Suzanne Fortier was in California and not in her office,” Boytinck said. “We did, however, receive a letter from Susan Aberman indicating that we can meet with the Principal on Thursday. We will be meeting with her this afternoon and are cautiously optimistic. She has not been particularly supportive in the past, and for almost a year we have been trying to obtain a meeting with her with no avail. So at least the sit in has obtained this meeting, showing that our actions are not in vain. We have a letter of demands prepared and would like to talk to her about them.”

Among Divest McGill’s demands, also outlined in the Facebook event, is a call for transparency.  

“[We demand] that the Committee to Advise [on] Matters of Social Responsibility (CAMSR) engage in a public, transparent consultation process and rewrite the report on Divest McGill’s petition based on those consultations,” the Facebook post read.

Scheer highlighted the negative social impacts of climate change, as one reason Divest McGill disagrees with the findings of CAMSR’s report.

“We also have to acknowledge that the World Health Organization has estimated […]  that 150,000 people die every year because of climate change,” Scheer said. “So, I don’t know how [CAMSR] can say with a straight face that that’s not social injury [….] It’s tremendously callous and outrageous that they would say that. I think we’re absolutely justified in our response.”

According to Marcil, McGill’s VP (Communications and External Relations,) the administration appreciated the peaceful nature of the protest.

“The senior administration values respectful discourse and discussion of issues on our campuses, and defends the right of students to express themselves through protest,” Marcil wrote in an email to the Tribune. “I'd like to particularly note the respectful way this protest was conducted, right down to the way the protesters cleaned up the area they were in before they departed. It is obvious that feelings are running high on this issue and undoubtedly the conversation will continue.”

Scheer affirmed that Divest McGill will lobby for divestment until the administration yields to their demands.

“Even when we leave [the square], we’re keeping the pressure on, so we’re not really going anywhere.” Scheer said.

McGill, News

McGill alumni return diplomas following BoG’s decision to not divest

by Alexia Martel-Desjardins on

More in McGill:

On April 1, Divest McGill held a diploma returning ceremony, during which McGill alumni returned their diplomas to demonstrate their disagreement with the Board of Governors’ (BoG) decision to not divest from fossil fuel companies. The ceremony took place in front of the James Administration Building and began with nine students and members of Divest McGill exiting the James Administration Building after four days of participating in a sit-in outside of Principal Suzanne Fortier’s office. 

Chloé Laflamme, U2 biochemistry and an organizer with Divest McGill, explained that the diploma return was an initiative started by two McGill alumni, Karel Mayrand and Camil Bouchard.

“After our Fossil Free Week in September, […] they came here and pledged to return their degrees to McGill if McGill had not divested by March 30, and [they] invited all alumni who wanted to join them to do so,” Laflamme said.

Thirteen graduates returned their diploma and six proxies were present for the alumni who had mailed in their diplomas but could not be present at the event. 

Bouchard, who obtained a PhD in philosophy in 1974 at McGill, explained that he returned his diploma because the institution’s investment in fossil fuels conflicts with his own values. 

“I have […]  a profound attachment to McGill,” he said. “[But] from now on, I do not feel able to represent McGill in my professional, or other activities. Therefore I will also remove from my name ‘PhD McGill 1974’ until McGill changes its policies and decides to divest from petroleum.”

[metaslider id=44845]​

Naghameh Sabet, Biochemistry ‘88,  who works at Scotiabank as a portfolio manager, expressed her disagreement with the BoG’s decision, and announced that one of her clients would refrain from making a $2 million donation to McGill due to its fossil fuel investments.

“We called McGill, we met with the specific department to receive the $2 million, […] until we got to the point that we were ready to sign,” Sabet said. “When we received the famous email from you, [Principal] Fortier, I informed my client and we are very sorry to say we are not going to contribute the $2 million to McGill anymore [….] If McGill does not reverse their decision, that money will be contributed to another educational institution that acts a little more wisely.” 

Director of Internal Communications at McGill, Doug Sweet, explained that there were no current plans for the BoG to re-open this discussion. 

“I have no idea whether they plan to reconsider, but an educated guess would say it’s unlikely,” Sweet said.

Sweet also noted that McGill alumni are a heterogenous body.

“[Our alumni are] a large and diverse community, as is the community on campus,” Sweet said. “Different people hold different views and McGill respects and understands that.” 

Laflamme explained that the ceremony demonstrated the concern of a larger community that is not always visible on campus.

“People who have left the McGill physical community also do not agree with the direction that the university is going in,” Laflamme said.

Laflamme further added that Divest McGill members will continue their campaign until the university’s position and decision process reflect the McGill community’s interests.

“We definitely feel that the process is not over,” Laflamme said. “The [BoG’s decision], we thought, was extremely inaccessible to the community and had a huge lack of transparency. If there’s going to be a final decision that is made, it has to be done properly with consultation of everybody who will be involved.” 

leacock building
Joke

Principal Fournier purchases fleets of car to aid walk from Leacock to McIntyre

by Will McAvoy on

More in Joke:

After a disappointing meeting with members of Divest McGill, McGill University Principal Josie-Anne Fournier announced plans to address a growing student complaint: The hike from Leacock Building to the McIntyre Medical Building.

“We will be purchasing 20 fleets of Cadillac Escalades to transport students to and from Leacock and McIntyre for free," Fournier said. “These vehicles will help students get to class on time, as well as reduce the hundreds of students the Health Centre receives each year due to slipping injuries."

Fournier is also intersted in making this experience as positive as possible for students added,

“We will also mandate that the engines be kept running at all times, so we can ensure that a student coming from the McLennan Library holding a cup of Premium Molson Coffee would be kept warm as soon as they board the Cadillac," Fournier said.

Lindsey Graham, a U2 Economics and Political Science double major, applauded the principal taking the initiative to address serious campus issues.

“Although I have never read the emails sent from Principal Fournier's office, I will definitely keep an eye out for the next one," Emma Dubois, U3 Management, added, “Drill, Baby, Drill! Harper 2020!”

Although McGill will absorb all costs for the coming Fall semester, SSMU will take charge of the vehicles and drivers from 2017 onwards.

“We expect all the students to chip in towards this service, which is why we will likely be calling for a $5.50 base fee increase in 2017," incoming SSMU president Jen Fer. “This time, it will pass."

1 … 741 742 743 744 745 … 1,363

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue