Latest News

a, Basketball, Sports

Changing the game: NBA Conferences

Although the NBA has a lot of things going right for it at the moment, years of disparity between the Western and Eastern Conference have caused many to wonder if some change in conference structure is needed. This gap has been especially clear this season, with Western Conference teams winning .677 per cent of games against Eastern Conference opponents. This week, Changing The Game explores how best to deal with this inequality.

The best of the best

  • The NBA should keep its current conference structure, but only for determining the schedule. The playoffs would then consist of the top 16 teams in the NBA, regardless of their ranking within their respective divisions or conferences. The immediate result of the changed playoff structure would be more competitive playoff games, as the best overall teams in any given season would automatically be given a ticket to the post-season. This proposed structure would also result in a more logical methodology for playoff seeding. Regular season rivalries would remain intact, and travel distances would not be altered. Each team would still play their four divisional opponents four times a year and would have to plan accordingly, but the simple fix of redoing the playoff seeding would endorse a more competitive and fair post-season for the NBA’s teams and fans.

     

    –Joe Khammar

     

  • Time to get wild

    While the most attractive option for fans may be to reduce the number of games in a season, it seems unlikely that owners and players would be willing to take the pay cut that would come along with it. If the 82-game season is going to remain, the league should explore the possibility of several wild card spots, with a fewer number of guaranteed slots for each conference. For example, each conference could be allotted six guaranteed playoff spots, with four wild cards pulled from either conference, and awarded based on best overall record. While this would not solve issues related to disparity in strength-of-schedule between Western and Eastern Conference teams, it would mostly eliminate the possibility of below-.500 teams sneaking into the playoffs as a low seed in a weak conference. A system like this would mean that this year, the New Orleans Pelicans and Oklahoma City Thunder would land in the playoffs and the Miami Heat and Charlotte Hornets would stay home in the post-season. Hardly anyone would argue that the Heat or Hornets are more deserving. Perhaps the best part about this system would be that it is easy to implement and would require no negotiations–the same cannot be said about shortening the length of the season.

     

  • Fewer games, more meaning

    The current disparity between the quality of the Eastern and Western Conferences is glaring. But as anyone who has taken an introductory economics class can tell you, markets are never fully in equilibrium—the level of talent in the NBA naturally fluctuates over time. From 1980 to 1989, teams from the East won over 50 per cent of games played. Inequalities take time to correct, and will often overcorrect if the market is interfered with. Instead of quick-fix radical realignment proposals, the solution to the NBA’s parity woes should aim to shorten the duration of these deviations from the equilibrium. This could be accomplished by shortening the regular season schedule from 83 games to 56. In addition to giving each game more meaning, a shorter regular season would add a dimension of unpredictability that would stifle the effect of a talent glut in either conference. Over an 82-game slate, the force of regression inevitably erodes away at the winning percentages of less talented teams. With fewer games, there would be more surprises, less injuries, and more excitement. While this proposal would reduce equilibrium on a season-by-season basis, it would eliminate long eras of dominance by either conference. Yes, a shorter season would mean less revenue for players and owners, but it would also contribute towards the long-term viability of a league that is already swimming in money.

     

    -–Elie Waitzer

     

  • Stay closer to home

    Although the disparity between the horrid Eastern Conference and the grueling Western Conference has been a major talking point in recent seasons, trying to create parity between the conferences is a short-sighted solution. Relative strength between the East and the West is continuously on a pendulum, it’s just that in recent years, that pendulum has swung in favour of the Western Conference. Surely, given enough time, the balance of power within the NBA will shift back. The greater problem at hand, however, is that of the geographic discrepancies within the divisions as they are currently constructed. The Northwest Division includes teams from Oregon, Minnesota, Utah, Colorado, and Oklahoma. Only one of those states is in the ‘Northwest.’ Additionally, both the Memphis Grizzlies and the New Orleans Pelicans are improperly placed in the Southwest Division when they would more aptly be placed in the Southeast.

    The solution should be to scrap the notion of conferences altogether and institute divisions of six teams each that are geographically compact. The Minnesota Timberwolves would join the Central Division and the Grizzlies and Pelicans would move to the Southeast, while the remaining Western Conference teams would be split up into new Pacific and Southwest Divisions. The top 16 teams would make the playoffs and would be seeded according to regular season record, making the first 82 games worth something.

     

    -–Mayaz Alam

     

a, Opinion

Commentary: Pope Francis forays into controversy

On Jan. 21, when asked about birth control and family planning for Catholic families, Pope Francis’ answer proved to greatly disappoint many people, both Catholics and non-Catholics alike. While it is understandable that it is impossible to cater to the varied interests of more than one billion Catholic followers, two weeks ago Pope Francis deliberately and surprisingly decided to please the orthodox side. The disappointment was probably heightened by the fact that his election in March 2013, as a successor to the much more conservative Pope Benedict XVI, created great hope among liberals that there would be a shift in ideology. There was a general sense of hope that Pope Francis would undertake radical reforms of the Catholic Church that would tackle controversial issues such as gay rights and recognition of divorce, and would foster a more open and sensible discussion regarding contraception.

What actually happened recently was a harsh return to doctrinal purity. Pope Francis made clear that the Catholic Church was still against birth control, claiming that there are “church-approved” ways to be a responsible parent, and that Catholics therefore had no excuse to “breed like rabbits,” as he put it. While little attention should be given to the perhaps crude expression used, what should be addressed is the apparent conservatism and orthodoxy behind this message.

Perhaps the wind of reform and liberalism that Pope Francis seemed to bring with him carried people away, and expectations were too high. Already, in October 2014, the reformists were disappointed by the failure of the bishop gathering. While Pope Francis pushed for family reforms, including marriage for the divorced and greater acceptance of homosexuality, the final document drafted at the gathering was watered down, and eventually completely rejected. There seemed to be a growing division among Church ranks between the doctrinal purity supporters and the reformists—for whom things did not go “far enough.”

This positioning makes one wonder if a reform of the Church is possible at all without threatening its core values, and hence without endangering its very existence.

Pope Francis’ comments on birth control may have been a way of reassuring the more orthodox segments of his followers, showing that he is still committed to the core values of the Catholic Church. It also reminds us that Pope Francis is an egalitarian who initially clamoured for more social equity and promised to fight poverty. This is a clear example of how the public may have been naïve and confused Pope Francis’ apparent egalitarianism with a strong will for general reforms, including a new stance on contraception.

However, this positioning makes one wonder if a reform of the Church is possible at all without threatening its core values, and hence without endangering its very existence. Pope Francis holds that the Church needs “to find a new balance.” But not “breeding like rabbits” proves to be both a very dissatisfying balance and a very small step towards individual sexual responsibility. Actually, this “new balance” between no contraception and sexual restraint puts greater pressure on Catholics, who are left with no choice but to have a restricted approach to sexuality. It is indeed insensitive to blame people for being “irresponsible,” as Pope Francis did during an interview, when the Church-approved methods of family planning only include abstinence, or at least abstinence when women are most “fertile.” Finally, Pope Francis consciously ignores the issue that contraception is not only about family planning, but also about general health and avoiding sexually transmitted infections. As Emily Rahaula stated in a TIME Magazine article, it is a matter of both public health and human rights. One can wonder if drawing a line between contraception and responsibility is itself the responsible thing to do.

a, Student Life, Student of the Week

Student of the Week: Rabab Wali

Rabab Wali has a down-to-earth attitude as well as an impressive track record of academic and extracurricular success, complemented by the visionary goals she has for her future. Wali is a full-time U3 student majoring in Environment and minoring in International Development Studies. Along with her commitment to school, she has been engaged in research in her field, is a committee member of the SUS Environment Committee, and volunteers regularly with the Muslim Student Association. 

Interested in the crossroads of sustainability and social justice, Wali investigated structural racism in the food system in Montreal, specifically in Park Extension borough, for her ENVR 401 research project during the Fall semester. 

“My research involved investigating ways in which people of colour or low income groups may be denied access to resources through unintentional institutional structures,” said Wali. “It was a lot of fun because we could do interviews with the residents [….] Park [Extension] is one of the most diverse communities in North America.” 

Wali and her team have applied to present their findings to the Quebec Public Integrative Research Council (QPIRC) in late March, as it is a Montreal-based community study.   Wali also engaged in research this past summer, spending three months working as a research assistant for a PhD candidate studying plant pathology in Kashmir. 

In addition to her involvement in environmental research at McGill and abroad, Wali is a committee member of the SUS Environment Committee. She attributes her involvement to her dedication to environmental issues outside the classroom. 

“Environment is my major, but I want to see what people in my major are doing around me, to be immersed in what I’m studying,” Wali said. 

The committee’s mandate explains that it “strives to foster a culture of sustainability within SUS by maintaining purchasing policies that favour environmentally benign and socially responsible products and services.” Green Week is among one of several projects she has helped organize.     

“Green week is a week of sustainable-focused events occurring [in] the third week of March to raise awareness of environmental issues,” Wali said. One of the highlights of the event is Eco-Couture. 

“During Eco-Couture, we promote sustainable fashion.” According to Wali, the Eco-Couture event is used to break the traditional boundaries of sustainability to enter cultural modes. 

Wali hails from many different global regions and cultures. She was born in Ireland, raised in the United Arab Emirates, and is Pakistani.  She attributes her interest in global sustainability to this unique upbringing.  

“I think exposure to different cultures is the best way to develop new ideas and ways of thinking,” she said. “Every place has something to offer and opens up perspectives.”

Her cultural roots and history have also encouraged her to volunteer with the Muslim Student Association.  She has contributed time to the association by organizing ski trips for the members and fundraising for events through ticket sales.  

Wali reflected on what has contributed to making her time at McGill excellent, noting the innovative research as a highlight of the institution. 

“I love it because you constantly hear of professors conducting amazing research,” she said. “It’s a great place to meet people doing amazing things [….] The campus is also incredibly diverse.”

Wali has exciting and ambitious professional goals for herself in the future.

“I hope to work in humanitarian assistance in relief organizations, particularly in the Middle East [in Yemen and Palestine],” she said.

 

McGill Tribune: What is your favourite spot in Montreal?

Rabab Wali: The Jacque Cartier Clock Tower.

 

MT: What is your favourite winter activity?

RW: In the United Arab Emirates it is hot all the time, so I was super excited about snow. I love skating. Snowmen are super hard though.

 

MT: Coffee or tea?

RW: I love tea, but I drink coffee for the caffeine.

 

MT: Most memorable children’s book?

RW: Everything by Enid Blyton, a British author who wrote short stories.

a, Martlets, Men's Varsity, Sports

The week that was for McGill Athletics: February 3rd

Athletes of the week

François Bourque

Bourque, a 6’6” sophomore from Terrebonne, Quebec, was once again instrumental for the Redmen as an interior presence in their two games against the UQAM Citadins over the weekend, averaging 15.5 points and 12.5 rebounds per game. Bourque was efficient from the field as well, shooting a shade under 50 per cent. A now two-time Tribune Athlete-of-the-Week, Bourque has made enormous strides in his second season with the Redmen and has a promising career ahead of him.

Gabrielle Davidson

Following a breakout sophomore season, Davidson has shown further dominance of the RSEQ. In her junior year, she has tallied 15 goals in just 16 games so far, notching a hat trick in a weekend rout of the Carleton Ravens. Although she was held scoreless in Friday’s contest against the Montreal Carabins, Davidson has been a force on the wing for the Martlets this season. The native of Pointe-Claire, Quebec is currently fourth in the CIS in points and fifth in goals, and will surely be vying for post-season honours if the Martlets are able to repeat their successes from last year. 

Beyond the box score

Redmen Hockey 

The Redmen (19-5-0) remain in sole possession of first place in the OUA East standings, beating the UOIT Ridgebacks 4-1 on Saturday to stay ahead of Carleton and UQTR. Senior centre Marc-Olivier Vachon was the star for McGill, scoring two goals on five shots. McGill never trailed in the game, finishing with a commanding 51-31 edge in shots. Additionally, second-year goalie Jacob Gervais-Chouinard came six seconds away from adding yet another shutout to his impressive resume. Gervais-Chouinard now leads all CIS goalies with a .946 save percentage, and is tied for first with a goals against average of 1.67. Last week’s Tribune Athlete-of-the-Week Samuel Labrecque stayed red-hot, tallying a goal in the contest for his 10th of the season. He leads all CIS defencemen in points with 20. With two games left before the end of the regular season, the Redmen are looking poised to make a deep run in the playoffs. They will face Concordia in the annual Corey Cup next Friday at 7:30 p.m at Ed Meagher Arena.

Martlet Basketball 

After being handed their first loss of the season by the second-place UQÀM Citadins (7-3) on Thursday night, the Martlets (9-1) came into Saturday’s rematch looking to set the record straight and maintain their hold on first place in the RSEQ standings. In a defensive showdown that came right down to the wire, Alex Kiss-Rusk drained a buzzer-beating jumper from the elbow to win it 57-55 for McGill. Kiss-Rusk, the team’s starting centre, led the Martlets with 15 points on 58 per cent shooting. She filled out the rest of the box score with nine rebounds, two blocks and two assists. Down 27-22 at halftime, the Martlets went on a run in the third quarter led by Kiss-Rusk and sophomore forward Jenn Silver to retake the lead heading into the fourth. After committing seven turnovers through the first three quarters, starting point guard Diana Ros settled down in the final frame, distributing the ball to Kiss-Rusk, Silver, and Mariam Sylla in the paint. Ros finished with five points, six assists, and two steals. The Martlets will meet the Citadins once more before the regular season ends, in what should be a tantalizing matchup of conference titans. They host Concordia next Thursday at 6 p.m. in Love Competition Hall.

Redmen Basketball

The last-place UQÀM Citadins (2-7) had the RSEQ-leading Redmen (7-2) basketball squad sweating this past weekend, splitting a two game series to register their first win against McGill in their past eight tries. After going up 66-40 after three quarters on Thursday at home, the Redmen lost their focus, weathering a 25-15 run by UQÀM in the final frame to escape with a 71-65 win. Sophomore forward François Bourque was phenomenal for the Redmen once again, recording his league-leading fourth double-double on 13 points and 14 boards. Freshmen Jeremie Cassavant-Dubois and Noah Daoust were pleasant surprises for the Redmen off the bench, each contributing double figures. Despite getting the win, the Redmen looked shaky all game, shooting just 20 per cent from beyond the arc and turning the ball over 21 times. 

The shooting woes, which have plagued McGill all season, continued in the second game of the series on Saturday night. After leading 33-27 at halftime, the Redmen crumbled down the stretch, falling to the Citadins 65-59 to break their six game winning streak. Despite another double-double from Bourque, who posted a game-high 18 points in the contest, McGill’s shooters couldn’t find the bottom of the net all night, shooting 35 per cent from the floor, 29 per cent from three, and 56 per cent from the charity stripe. Even the Redmen can’t expect to stroll to a win against a cellar-dweller while giving away points at the line. It wasn’t all bad news though: Captain Vincent Dufort came back from an undisclosed illness looking healthy and in form, scoring 10 points in his usual starting role. With six games left in the season, the Redmen have a comfortable two-game lead on second-place Laval, but certainly can’t afford to be losing games against UQÀM down the stretch. They face Concordia next Thursday at 8 p.m. in Love Competition Hall.

By the numbers

3 – Number of games in which Martlet hockey forward Gabrielle Davidson has been held pointless this season, the third of which came this past Friday in McGill’s 5-0 loss to Montreal.

4.4 – Average margin by which the Redmen hockey team has outshot its opponents this season, scoring on just over 10 per cent of those shots.

9.6 – Average number of rebounds that sophomore Redmen forward François Bourque pulls down per game, good enough to make Bourque the RSEQ leader in that category.

1435 – Total number of days it had been since the Martlet basketball last went into double-overtime prior to this past Thursday’s loss to UQÀM.

a, Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Windy City for the win in AUTS’ Chicago

Part of the thrill that comes from live musical theatre is knowing that something could go wrong at any moment, but rarely does. The best theatre uses this to its advantage, radiating a sense of jubilant spontaneity that wriggles its way into the audience’s hearts and leaves them humming the songs on the walk home. The Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society’s (AUTS) production of the 1975 musical, Chicago, fits this description with a top-quality cast and production values to match.

Set almost entirely inside of a 1920s jazz bar “where the gin is cold and the piano’s hot,” Chicago tells the story of Roxie Hart—a young, resourceful singer who gets sent to prison after murdering her philandering lover. She gets introduced to an ensemble of murderous women and a media-savvy lawyer who takes a special interest in Roxie’s case. As that case becomes famous, she begins to angle for a place in the spotlight while faking her innocence in order to avoid the death penalty.

The acting is top-to-bottom great and impeccably cast. Vanessa Drunsnitzer plays Roxie with the right amount of ingenuity and malice to keep the audience constantly guessing what her true intentions are. Velma Kelly (Natalie Aspinall) serves as a mirror to Roxie, simultaneously more experienced and vulnerable, doing a spot-on version of the brassy sexuality that typifies the 1920s. Rounding out the main players are Kenny Wong as the aforementioned lawyer, who manages to shine despite being plagued with microphone problems during the entire performance; Nour Malek as the de facto mother hen to the female prisoners with just the right amount of authority; and Olivier Bishop-Mercier as Roxie’s feckless husband—nervous, and woefully unable to navigate the world that his wife has thrown him into.

The ensemble cast is—remarkably—equally well-rounded. Due to the high number of ancillary roles in the production, each member gets a chance to display his or her talents solo, and each one fully delivers—especially the women in “Cell Block Tango” and Jessica Eckstadt as Mary Sunshine, whose song “A Little Bit of Good” is the most technically impressive vocal performance in the entire production.

The choreography doesn’t stray too much from the Bob Fosse playbook, much to its benefit. Director and choreographer Debora Friedmann must have spent countless hours with the entire cast, nailing the acrobatic sexuality of Fosse’s original moves. As a result,  the cast clicks as a single unit, with each of the 17 performers seeming to know the exact placement of every other cast member and prop on the stage, working at a level of professionalism that you don’t normally see in student theatre.

The lighting might be the most impressive aspect of the entire play, adding an extra layer of nuance and dressing up the stage to alternate between a prison, law office, courtroom, and nightclub. Crisp spotlights of the jazz bar fade to striking reds and blues of the prison. Little flourishes like flashing red during a murder, and a spotlight that comically avoids a character who sings about being invisible make it stand out without taking too much focus away from the cast.

Props are largely utilitarian, mainly serving the masterful blocking outlined in original productions. Friedmann adds to the whole jazz bar aesthetic by keeping the orchestra on the stage for the entire show, which gives the non-bar scenes a feeling of dreamy musicality. The orchestra itself is also wonderful, full of brass and catchy piano that manages to shine even outside of the original songs.

Really, the only flaws that exist beyond the aforementioned microphone problems are those that come from the source material itself. The first act is a little thin on plot, which makes the second act feel rushed.  However, the plot, like that of most musicals, mainly serves as a vessel for the songs and doesn’t drag the production level down. All in all, Chicago is one hell of a ride.

Chicago will be performed from Thursday, Jan. 22 to Saturday, Jan. 24 and from Thursday, Jan. 29 to Saturday, Jan. 31 at 7:30 p.m. at Moyse Hall. Visit www.autsmcgill.com for ticket information.

a, News

SUS retroactively runs fee referendum questions following confusion over constitution

The Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) is retroactively running two referendum questions regarding student fees that were collected in the January statement for all Science and Arts & Science students. The SUS Base Fee and the newly-introduced Student Space Improvement Fee (SCSS) were collected under the impression that their referendum questions had passed when students had voted in November during the mislabeled Fall 2014 referendum, which was run instead under online ratification guidelines.

The SUS executives initially brought the two fee questions as motions to the General Assembly (GA) held on Nov. 5, 2014. Because the GA failed to meet quorum, the GA results were presented to the SUS General Council (GC) as a consultative body, in accordance to Article 7.1 of the SUS general assembly bylaws. The GC then approved to send the two fee questions into a referendum to be voted on by all Science and Arts & Science students.

According to Zach Houston, Science representative to the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), the confusion stemmed from the fact that the fee questions were sent out as “Fall referendum questions” yet operated under online ratification guidelines, which have a lower quorum requirement than referendum questions. Houston, along with the SUS Speaker and CRO, determined that quorum had not been met for the fee questions following the Dec. 4 SSMU Council meeting when Houston was asked by Council about voter turnout at the GA. However, this occurred after SUS executives had already submitted the results to Ollivier Dyens, deputy provost (Student Life and Learning) (DPSLL).

“Although the questions went to referendum [in the Fall], the proper procedures for a referendum were not followed,” Houston’s report to the Jan. 15 SSMU Council reads. “Instead, the procedures for online ratification of GA motions were followed [….] However, the ratification was unnecessary, as the GA motions were referred to General Council and thus did not require ratification.”

According to SUS President Shannon Herrick, the questions were originally thought to have passed with a six per cent voter turnout, which was above the SUS constitution’s five per cent online ratification requirement (Article 22.1.3) but below the 10 per cent referendum requirement (Article 20.4). 

“As a CRO, I am not responsible for GA ratification questions,” SUS Chief Returning Officer (CRO) Danielle Toccalino said. “So they were not passed by me before they were posed to the entire science population for the online ratification. I am responsible for any referendum questions, and this was the step that was mistakenly missed. The ratification results were taken as referendum results.”

According to Article 22.7 of the SUS constitution, “All resolutions passed at the General Assembly must be submitted to an online vote for ratification, overseen by the Chief Returning Officer.”

However, Toccalino stated that the SUS Computer Task Force (CTF) runs the online elections software and because the GA had not met quorum, she was not involved.

“As the ratification was of the outcome of a consultative body, it was not binding, and therefore did not need my involvement to my understanding and interpretation of our constitution and by-laws,” she said.

Both the increased Base Fee and SCSS fee were charged to students’ January statements. According to SUS executives, these fees are currently being held in a closed account and will be refunded to students should the Winter 2015 referendum questions fail to pass.

The first referendum question sought to raise the SUS Base Fee from $7.50 to $12.50 for full-time science students. The second referendum question sought to levy the newly-created opt-outable SCSS fee, which would charge $7.00 per semester for full-time Science students.

VP Internal Shaun Lampen stated during the SUS Fall GA that the SCSS fee would go towards renovating Burnside Hall. 

“The renovation […] is meant for making [Burnside Hall] conducive to student space and studying,” Lampen said.

The questions were sent to students as “Fall referendum questions” and the results labeled as “Fall referendum results”, with 58.9 percent voting “Yes” to the increase in the Base Fee, and 59.3 percent voting “Yes” to the new SSCS fee.

“On Jan. 7, the SUS General Council acknowledged the error and resolved to send both questions to a Winter referendum,” Houston’s report reads. 

However, an email sent out by VP Communications May Yin-Liao on Jan. 18 still stated that “the motions to increase the SUS base fee and to introduce a Student Space Improvement Fee were passed at [the GA] and ratified online in the Fall 2014 semester.”

“I think the confusion […] lies in the fact that the motions that were passed at the GA were not directly asking to change the SUS base fee or introduce a new fee, but instead, were asking for permission to bring the fees to a referendum,” said Yin-Liao. “However, it was indeed our mistake for letting the office of the [deputy provost] go forward with adding the new fees with only the GA online ratification results provided and not the referendum results.”

SUS VP Finance Eileen Bui stated that the questions being run in the Winter are not identical to the ones from the Fall. She stated that the deputy provost’s office wanted the questions to be reworded to exclude the part on index inflation based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) due to the market’s unpredictability. 

“Later on, if it passes, then in the financial bylaws I would change it so that every three or five years the VP Finance would submit a motion in order to index the fee to whatever the inflation [actually] is,” Bui said.

Herrick acknowledged SUS’ error and stated that the executives were making changes to prevent this type of mistake from happening again.

"I wish we could have [caught] such a little thing earlier on,” Herrick said. “We are making a bunch of revisions to our bylaws and constitution to make sure that in the future something like this won’t happen. Our fee hasn’t been changed in seven years. It’s an unfortunate situation and we’re trying to make the best of it.”

This article was corrected Monday, February 2, 2015.

a, Science & Technology

Research project engages undergraduates in research

Unlike traditional courses, where students perform predictable experiments to learn laboratory techniques, MIMM 212’s (Laboratory in Microbiology) students are on the front lines of scientific research. 

The course is part of the Small World Initiative (SWI), a project based out of Yale University that seeks to engage undergraduates in scientific research tackling the real-world problem of antibiotic resistance. Students in the lab are challenged to learn standard laboratory procedures and apply them to their own research projects. The SWI has partners in over 50 academic institutions, with McGill as the first Canadian university to join the initiative and as one of the first international partners.

MIMM 212 was revamped for Fall 2014 to align with the SWI’s objectives by having students analyze local soil samples and search for antibiotic-producing microorganisms. Student response has been overwhelmingly positive. Among the reasons for this support is the way that the course allows students to experience conducting research. 

“I appreciated that our labs built on previous weeks,” Jessica Yudcovitch, U1 Science, explained. “I think it made it a more realistic experience in regards to actual laboratory research.” 

According to Daniel Huang, U1 Science, the potential ramifications of the results of the lab’s experiments in the real world were also a highlight of the course.

“The course focuses on a real issue [antibiotic resistance] that’s affecting thousands of people, so it provides more than just learning standard lab techniques like growing bacteria or doing PCRs,” Huang said. “Everything was geared towards finding new bacterial species that could produce novel antibiotics to tackle the rise of bacterial superbugs, which makes doing well on all the experiments and focusing on all the pre-lab lectures easier, more important, and much more meaningful.” 

Despite the course’s success, the process of designing a course in which the results of experiments are not known ahead of time can be difficult.

“One challenge was reacting to the results [that] the students were getting in real time,” said course professor Samantha Gruenheid. “The major goal of the course is to identify and characterize antibiotic-producing bacterial strains from the soil. At the beginning of the term, I didn’t know how many of the students’ bacterial isolates would have this activity. What if there were very few? What would we do for the rest of the term?”

The shift in the course’s focus from rote memorization and mastering routine tasks to a more open-ended project means that the course is continuously evolving.

“At first, I think it was an adjustment for them to be given the freedom and some of them took some time to build up their confidence to make their own decisions about their projects,” Gruenheid said. “Maybe a few of them were thinking ‘Just tell me what I need to memorize to do well in this class.’ However, when I saw the presentations at the end of the year, I was really impressed. In addition to learning the lab skills, I think they learned a lot more about thinking, researching, and communicating like a scientist.”

Students currently enrolled in the course have praised its unconventional structure. 

“I would absolutely recommend this course to other students,” said Liz Harvey, U1 Science. “The grading is fair, the people are great, and the work is meaningful.”

a, Features

Behind the legacy: A look into Montreal’s most famous crime family

A

t the corner of Rue Jarry and Rue des Forges, in the north-end of Montreal, there is a small plaza. At first glance, it appears fairly ordinary–there are several independent shops, a karaoke bar, a couple of cafés, and a Uniprix. The area is close to the highway, but quiet enough so that there are only a few intersections with traffic lights nearby. Despite its unremarkable appearance, the plaza was once home to the Consenza Social Club, the former headquarters of the Rizzuto crime family and a known hangout for Montreal mobsters.

For decades, the Rizzutos have been Canada’s most prominent crime family, but a number of deaths and arrests over the past several years has led to a decline in the family’s power. A number of reporters and members of the public have labelled this decline the end of an era and the beginning of a new one. With this shift, the Rizzutos have left a legacy as perhaps the most famous crime family in Canadian history.

Much like the plaza, there is nothing about Montreal that makes it look or feel distinctly like a city with deep ties to organized crime. It is difficult to say why Montreal became such a hub for these activities; however, its roots stem from the mid-20th century, when Montreal was growing rapidly, making it a natural landing spot for recent immigrants from Europe. Its close proximity to New York, where the mafia was already established, and its shipping port—which provides easy access to international markets—may have also been factors, but it’s impossible to point to one as the sole cause.

Perhaps part of the reason that Montreal does not seem like a natural fit for organized crime is that our vision of that world is partially shaped by films and other entertainment. The death of the former head of the Rizzuto family, Vito Rizzuto, in 2013 was quiet, with Rizzuto passing away in Montreal’s Sacré-Coeur Hospital a day after being admitted with pulmonary problems. There has been no shortage of violent ends in Montreal’s underworld, but those deaths seem discreet and clean when propped up against the type of murder taking place in Scarface. In contrast to the actors of the film, Vito Rizzuto was known for keeping a low profile, dealing primarily with close, trusted associates as head of the family. He was also an impressive negotiator, creating strategic partnerships with other criminal organizations such as the Hell’s Angels. His death came just a few years after the assassinations of both his father and son, and left many asking what would become of the Rizzuto dynasty. 

“You’re not only burying an individual, you’re burying a Mafia leader, but also, in many ways, you’re putting to bed a dynasty,” Julian Sher, a senior producer of the investigative television program The Fifth Estate, told the CBC in 2013. “The big question everyone inside the Mafia, the public, and the police are asking themselves is, ‘Who comes next and will there ever be someone of that power and stature in the future?’”

When Nicolo Rizzuto Sr. and his family arrived in Halifax from Sicily in 1954 aboard the MS Vulcania, the Montreal mafia was already operating. After immigrating with his family to Montreal from Calabria, Italy, Vincenzo Cotroni established Montreal’s first syndicate in the 1940s. By the 1950s, the operation had developed into an important branch of the Bonanno family–a powerful New York City mafia with Sicilian ties.

Rizzuto Sr. began his career in the mafia as an associate of the Cotroni family, forming a crew by way of his roots, and getting help from relatives and associates with ties to Sicily. Rizzuto Sr. was often closely linked to the Sicilian Mafia and did not care for the traditional system of command within the Calabrian Cotroni family. This became a source of tension, and before long, a war broke out between the Calabrian and Sicilian factions of the Montreal mafia.

“He is going from one side to the other, here and there, he says nothing to nobody, he is doing business and nobody knows anything,” Paolo Violi said in 1976, which was documented in the Commission du police du Quebec report, “Enquête sur le crime organisé,” Montreal 1976. Violi succeeded Vic Cotroni as the family boss of the Cotroni family in the 1970s, and was clearly unhappy with the independence of Rizzuto Sr.’s Sicilian faction. The Bonanno family sent representatives to Montreal to try to settle the issue, but nothing could be resolved. Thanks in part to its Sicilian background, the Bonanno family ultimately sided with Rizzuto Sr., giving him approval to try to end the dispute.

War between the Sicilian and Calabrian factions broke out in 1976 with the Rizzuto family orchestrating the murder of one of Violi’s advisors, Pietro Sciara. A year later, two Rizzuto gunmen shot and killed one of Violi’s brothers, Francesco. Violi clearly had a target on his back as well, but a brief stint in jail granted him a bit of safety. In 1978, shortly after his release, however, Violi was murdered. He was shot in the head at close range while playing cards in a café owned by Sicilians. Rizzuto Sr. was alleged to have participated in some form.

In 1980, Calabrians were destroyed. Rocco Violi, Paolo’s last brother, was shot by a sniper rifle while sitting down to dinner with his family, effectively ending the war. The Rizzutos were now Montreal’s foremost crime family, overseeing drug trafficking, illegal gambling, money laundering, contract killings, and more. It was around this time that Rizzuto Sr. handed over the family business to his son Vito.

Until his death, Vito oversaw an empire worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But the family’s foundation had been shaken even in the years prior to Vito’s passing. In 2009, Vito’s son Nick Rizzuto Jr. was gunned down in Montreal’s Notre-Dame-de-Grace neighbourhood. Agostino Cuntrera, widely seen as Vito’s successor, was murdered in broad daylight less than a year after Rizzuto Jr.’s death. Finally, five months after Cuntrera was killed, Nicolo Rizzuto Sr. was assassinated while eating dinner with his daughter and wife.

In a span of less than two years, the Rizzuto family’s past and future were dealt serious blows. The decade leading up to these murders, however, had been far from easy for the family thanks to a series of Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) investigations and legal battles.

In 1981, Vito Rizzuto took a trip to New York City, which police believe represented his formal induction into the Bonanno crime organization. The purpose of the trip was to allegedly aid the Bonannos with the murder of three of the family’s captains who were suspected of being disloyal. Rizzuto was charged with conspiracy to commit murder in 2004 following a police crackdown on the mafia in New York. U.S. officials pushed hard for Rizzuto to be extradited, but his team of lawyers claimed the statute of limitations for the alleged crimes had expired. Despite an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, Rizzuto was eventually extradited and sentenced to 10 years in prison. His arrest was a major hit to the family business, and it forced Rizzuto Sr. to acquire a bigger role in the operation.

Around the same time, the RCMP was beginning to make arrests and lay charges using evidence gathered in “Operation Colisée,” a four-year investigation consisting of millions of hours of taped conversations between high-ranking Mafia members. Authorities laid hundreds of charges against Rizzuto family members and their associates, but Rizzuto Sr. managed to escape without serving any jail time. With millions in assets seized, however, there was clearly significant damage done, made all the worse by Vito’s absence due to his own legal troubles.

Perhaps the most famous thing to emerge from “Operation Colisée” was the Charbonneau Commission. The Commission revealed significant corruption in Quebec’s construction industry and led to the resignation of both Montreal mayor Gérald Tremblay and his successor Michael Applebaum. It also offered a glimpse of how far the Rizzutos’ reach extended. The heads of nearly every major construction company in the province were connected to the family, with many spending ample time at the Consenza Social Club. For example, Nicolo Milioto—former President of Mivela Construction—was seen at the café 236 times during “Operation Colisée,” often exchanging money with Rizzuto family members or associates.

Vito Rizzuto’s death did not mean that the Mafia enterprise simply stopped. Despite Montreal’s Mafia lacking a true ‘Godfather,’ most operations have continued unchanged. What is clear, however, is that the power structure in the Montreal underworld is currently in flux.

“To have [Vito] now permanently removed from the underworld, the crime landscape, it’ll just open up the floodgates to everyone jockeying for positions,” Adrian Humphreys, author of The Sixth Family, which describes the rise of Vito Rizzuto, told the CBC.

When Vito was freed from jail in 2012, he returned to a drastically different landscape than the one he’d left behind. Though there are remaining Rizzuto family supporters, Vito’s death marked the end of an era. What comes next is unclear.  particularly because this is the point in mafia films when the screen goes dark and the credits roll. Whatever does happen, this much is apparent: It is going to take a lot to replace the Rizzutos as Canada’s ‘First Criminal Family.’

a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Deep Cuts: Time Warp

My Same

Artist: Adele
Album: 19

Released: January 28, 2008

Adele has made a name for herself with her soulful and powerful voice, bringing new beauty to pop ballads. In “My Same” Adele’s vocal muscles were not flexed as far as on other tracks, but the cool vintage piece highlights her distinct, old–fashioned voice. Adele blends deep, luxurious vocals with catchy jazz guitar melodies, and a swung rhythm to compose a classy romantic number. Lyrically, she moves away from her usual subject—breakups. Instead, “My Same” is about the fun romance of an unlikely pair. Enjoy with a martini, heavy-winged eyeliner, and ’60s bouffant. 

Well, You Can Do It Without Me 

Artist: Father John Misty

Album: Fear Fun

Released: April 30, 2012

The former Fleet Foxes drummer Joshua Tillman is now producing music as Father John Misty. On “Well You Can Do It Without Me,” he returns to quality roots of rock ‘n’ roll with steady blues guitar rhythms and conventional lyrics holding together the laid-back jam. The gruff but strong vocals complete the song’s sound: It’s both new and retro; it returns to the blues rock sounds of the late ’70s, but isn’t a copy of other current acts like The Black Keys or Jack White.

Apocalypse Dreams

Artist: Tame Impala

Album: Lonerism

Released: October 5, 2012

Tame Impala is known for the influence of psychedelic rock in its music on tracks like “Feels Like We Only Go Backwards.” But the group really radiates the euphoric sounds of the late ’60s on “Apocalypse Dreams.” It features lead singer Kevin Parker channelling the voice of John Lennon as well as drippy keyboard chords and fuzzy synth effects. Bursts of blissed-out guitar riffs and detached and dreamy lyrics give the song a dizzying and indulgent feel. Like the psychedelic rock of the ’60s and ’70s, you’ll feel a little bit high after just one hit. 

In Case of Fire 

Artist: Mark Ronson
Album: Uptown Special

Released: January 13, 2015

Mark Ronson has blown up the radio recently, with Bruno Mars lending his voice to Ronson’s chart-topping single, “Uptown Funk.” Uptown Special features the vocals of artists with a wide range of styles. Most noteworthy is his collab with Jeff Bhasker, “In Case of Fire.” The jam starts off with heavy guitar riffs circa 1982 before sliding into a smooth bass line, organ groove, and breathy falsetto vocals. If there is one thing that tells us that this song wasn’t released in the ‘80s, it’s the reference to the drug of choice of the 2010s: Adderall.

a, Football, Sports

Super Bowl XLIX Preview

 

The McGill Tribune sports section previews Super Bowl XLIX. Two writers square off to decide whether the New England Patriots or the Seattle Seahawks will hoist the Lombardi Trophy. McGill personalities, native New Englander and Creative Director Hayley Lim, and native Seattleite and Managing Director, Jess Fu weigh in with their picks. Click each perspective to read more

Patriots

The Patriots will win their fourth Super Bowl this Sunday because they have balance—something the Seahawks, despite all their strengths, do not possess. On offence, Tom Brady has been looking like his usual self, and has a track record of consistently elevating players around him. Expect Brady to come out firing on all cylinders and to shred the Seahawks’ defence mercilessly. Rob Gronkowski is currently untouchable, and not even the ‘Legion of Boom’ will be able to stop him in the red zone. Julian Edelman, Brandon LeFell, and Danny Amendola are a severely underrated receiving corps that will cause nightmares for the Seahawks’ secondary. Furthermore, with a bulldozer like LeGarrette Blount, the Patriots have a strong running game to complement their reliable passing game. The hobbled Seahawks’ defence will not be able to keep up.

On the defensive side, the Patriots have significantly upgraded from where they stood last year. With the addition of Darelle Revis, the Patriots can shut down any opposing receiver one-on-one. The Patriots’ offensive and defensive lines contain Pro-Bowl-calibre players who can tame Marshawn Lynch, the only true weapon Seattle possesses on offence. After Russell Wilson’s catastrophic, five-interception performance against the Packers, the Patriots will look to exploit his shaken confidence. The Patriots are solid on both sides of the ball, and that is what will lead them to victory against the Seahawks.

 

 

 

 

Seahawks

In this battle of league titans, it’s going to come down to momentum and cohesion. After pulling a miraculous comeback victory over the Packers out of a hat in the NFC Championship game, the Seahawks have no shortage of energy and, besides the obvious raw talent, will rely on their chemistry and a veteran core to defend their title in the Super Bowl.
Yes, there are questions surrounding Russell Wilson’s composure after his ugly outing against Green Bay. Yes, Tom Brady is probably a better quarterback at the end of the day. But Wilson and the Seahawks have always found a way to get it done, and unlike the Patriots, they’ve had to fight and claw their way to Arizona. An overtime squeaker is still a win–especially against Aaron Rodgers and the Packers, and it has only cemented the Seahawks’ confidence. If they’re down by two touchdowns with Patriots Head Coach Bill Belichick lining up ineligible receivers left and right, the Seahawks will undoubtedly be prepared and won’t be deflated. In fact, Pete Carroll is no stranger to New England trickery—he served as the Patriots’ head coach immediately before Belichick’s reign began.
With Marshawn Lynch looking menacing in the backfield, a receiving corps that includes Doug Baldwin and the emergent Jermaine Kearse, and a secondary that is largely unchanged from last year’s Super Bowl winning ‘Legion of Boom,’ the Seahawks will find a way to take down the Patriots on Sunday.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patriots
27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seahawks
24

 

 

 

 

  • McGill Celebrity Picks

    Q1: Who do you want to win?

    Q2: Why do you think they will win?

    Q3: Who is your favourite player?

     

  • Jessica Fu

    Managing Director

    1: I’m sending all my love and prayers to the Hawks in Arizona.

    2: Lately, the Hawks have seemed to only grow into themselves in the second halves of games. I would love for them to come out swinging next weekend, as it would save me the heavy-breathing-curled-up-in-a-ball-in-a-corner-for-three-hours anxiety that last week’s game induced. On the other hand, I’ve been weirdly maternal these days, so I’m just really happy that they’ve made it as far as they have. 

    3: Doug Baldwin Jr. is more breathtaking than all of the Pats players combined. He’s got a smile that can light up the whole town—not that Arizona needs it. (But I do.)

     

  • Dallon Kuprowski

    Redmen Quarterback

    1: I am cheering for the Seahawks. Russell Wilson is too much fun to watch to not cheer for them. Add personalities like Marshawn Lynch and Richard Sherman and it makes for exciting football. 

    2: I think they’ll be in tough against the consistency of the Pats. But if they can ride the wave of momentum created by their 12th man, they can pull it out on a few big plays. 

    3: I’d have to go with Russell Wilson. It seems like every week he manages to get away with doing things you don’t see in today’s NFL.  He’s also one of the few guys who is constantly in the spotlight and has always handled himself like a true professional. 

     

  • Kareem Ibrahim

    U2 Arts Senator

    1: The losing team. They definitely need some serious lovin’.

    2: Because a moral victory is all that matters, AM I RIGHT LADIES?

    3: Beyonce, hands-down. Did you see her in the Super Bowl two years ago? Exactly.

     

  • Mark Brawley

    Political Science Professor

    1. I’m picking the Patriots. 

    2: Belichick’ s a genius at coaching, though he may be a bit too competitive for his own good. He’s a great leader because he surrounds himself with smart people (aka Josh McDaniels), who get the most out of the talent they have on the field. 

     

  • Hayley Lim

    Creative Director

    1: Pats.

    2: The Pats will win because of the  relentless, passionate, and merciless spirit of New England backing them. The impending blizzard will give them strength equal to that of Paul Revere on his midnight ride, the travellers of the Freedom Trail, or when I finish a huge bowl of Legal Seafoods clam chowdah.

    3: My favourite player–the ‘Masshole’ wearing a Bruins hat in Gillette stadium.

     

  • Melodie Daoust

    2014 Olympic Gold Medalist

    1: I want the Patriots to win. 

    2: They will win because they have a very well balanced team from offence to defence.

    3: Tom Brady is my favourite player!

     

  • Drew Love

    Athletics and Recreation Executive Director

    1: I am a huge Patriots fan. Very excited that they are in the Super Bowl once again.

    2: The Pats will win the game. They have the best quarterback in football (well I am a fan so what else can I say), a great tight end, all-purpose receiver/returner, a good running game, and a well-organized and thought-out game plan from their coaching staff.

    3: My favorite player, no question–Tom Brady

     

Editor's Pick: Patriots
It’s almost too tight to call, but the Patriots will be crowned Super Bowl XLIX Champions on Sunday. Fortunately for New England, they won’t be facing Eli Manning and the Giants.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue