Latest News

Football, Sports

NFL 2020 Season Preview: Looking for a new dynasty in the AFC

The 2019 NFL season ended with the Kansas City Chiefs, led by Super Bowl MVP Patrick Mahomes, capturing the Lombardi Trophy in Super Bowl LIV over the San Francisco 49ers. The subsequent off-season has been unstable and unpredictable and is sure to change the landscape of the NFL for the foreseeable future.

While COVID-19 has instilled discomfort and uncertainty in the months leading up to the restart of the NFL season, the NFL has subsequently addressed several concerns regarding the pandemic. Players, coaches, and team personnel will be tested daily to ensure minimal spread of the virus and are required to wear masks throughout the facilities. In addition, special devices called SafeZone tags must be worn at all times while on NFL property for the purpose of advanced contact tracing. Concerns have arisen that cases could rise when team travel resumes, as was the case with the MLB earlier this summer, but protocols have been put in place in the event of positive tests, with expanded practice squads and future time slots for games that may be cancelled. 

Racial injustice has also been a dominant concern regarding the 2020 NFL restart, as players voiced their frustration with institutions throughout the United States. League Stars such as Michael Thomas, Ezekiel Elliot, and Patrick Mahomes, among many others, were vocal during protests this summer, demanding that the NFL support the fight for racial justice. In response, the league has committed $250 million dollars over the next 10 years to help fight “social injustice.” The league has allowed players to put social justice messages on their helmets and has chalked “End Racism” into the back of all endzones.

AFC

The American Football Conference has experienced a drastic shift for the first time in almost two decades with increased parity among teams and a new leading title contender for the foreseeable future. The New England Patriots lost quarterback Tom Brady in the offseason, a partnership that won six super bowls, nine AFC championships, and saw sixteen seasons atop the AFC East. The end of the Patriots’ dynasty this season marks the end of an era for the entire league and has subsequently paved the way for the newly-crowned Super Bowl Champion Kansas City Chiefs to dominate the field in the coming years. The Baltimore Ravens and 2019 NFL MVP Lamar Jackson, however, will be looking to dethrone the Chiefs after a disappointing divisional playoffs loss. Though these two juggernauts will likely lead the conference this season, the Buffalo Bills, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Tennessee Titans are also all talented, proven teams within the conference. 

NFC

In the past five seasons, the National Football Conference has sent a different team to the Super Bowl each year, demonstrating the and dispersed talent that exists within each division. Unlike the AFC, several teams have a legitimate chance of dethroning the defending conference champion 49ers. San Francisco’s largest threat may be within their own division: The Seattle Seahawks, led by Superbowl Champion quarterback Russell Wilson. In the South, Drew Brees and Tom Brady look to bring New Orleans and Tampa Bay back to the Superbowl. Although neither franchise has gone that far in more than a decade, the two future Hall-of-Fame signal callers and Lombardi Trophy winners are looking to change that. In the East, the Dallas Cowboys are looking for a rebound season with a loaded roster and first-year Head Coach Mike McCarthy. The Philadelphia Eagles also hope to return to championship contention by staying healthy this year, after two disappointing seasons riddled with injuries following their Super Bowl victory in the 2017 season. The lack of a clear favorite for the NFC this season is sure to make for several upsets and an interesting postseason.

McGill, News

Certain international graduate programs see sharp tuition hike

International students in some non-thesis masters’ programs will see their tuition rate jump by 30 per cent, compared to a 3.1 per cent tuition increase for students in other programs relative to the 2019-2020 school year. The increase comes after the Quebec government announced a policy in May 2018 that allowed public universities to deregulate international tuition rates, meaning that McGill was able to set its own tuition rates without legislative oversight. The policy came into effect in Fall 2019. 

Although the increased tuition will help McGill run programs and research, the rise in tuition for some programs was thought to be drastic by many. Michael Overton, a master’s student in the Sound Recording program, expected to pay approximately $11,100 in Fall 2020 tuition fees. When his tuition increased by more than 28 per cent to over $14,300, Overton was alarmed. 

It makes me feel as though international students are simply seen as a revenue stream instead of people that come from different economic situations,” Overton said.

 For many students, this increase came as a surprise. Connie Shen, Financial Affairs Officer of the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS), believes that many students were not given enough notice to financially plan for the tuition fee spikes.

Many students did not anticipate such a large increase, and therefore did not get the chance to budget and plan accordingly,” Shen said. “Some students were not even aware of this increase until it appeared on their bill in August.”

Given that the COVID-19 pandemic has already exacerbated the financial strain for many students, the massive increase added unnecessary stress for many of Shen’s classmates who were expected to pay their bills by Aug. 25. Shen would have preferred if McGill had implemented the increase gradually and communicated the changes more clearly.

“The timing of this increase is very unfortunate,” Shen said. “There will be many students who will be unable to pay increased tuition due to the pandemic. There are many students who relied on income from part-time work in order to pay tuition. Many graduate students also have dependents, and the added pressure of caring for children during the pandemic has made it difficult for student-parents to work as they normally would.”

Although not all students experienced a tuition increase as drastic as 30 per cent, all 2020-2021 tuition rates increased by 3.1 per cent compared to last year. International student Ahmad Hendie, U1 Engineering, is concerned that these increases may force students who are already struggling to pay tuition to study at another university. 

“McGill needs to expand its financial aid offerings for returning [international students] in need,” Hendie said. “As [even] the annual three to four per cent fee increases might squeeze out internationals who are stretching to afford McGill.”

However, Hendi also acknowledged that the tuition increase will help McGill stay competitive among other top-tier universities in Canada.

“Funding, of which a large [percentage] comes from international tuition, is vital for [McGill’s] rankings as it highly affects research output.”

McGill Media Relations Officer Frédérique Mazerolle explained that the increase in tuition would help to fund academic programs and services.

This policy change will allow McGill to retain tuition paid by international undergraduate students to support academic programs, services, and financial assistance delivered to McGill students,” Mazerolle wrote to the Tribune

The Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (GPS) society will be helping the affected students, such as those in Overton’s program, to offset the increased costs. In addition, McGill’s administration noted the creation of certain programs to help students pay for their elevated tuition rates, such as a “line of credit” for students in critical need. The administration also offers the McGill Student Emergency Support Fund, which serves to assist students affected financially by the COVID-19 crisis. While these programs can potentially help international students afford attending McGill, the tuition increase continues to burden many.

Student Life

Feminist Health Research Conference highlights gender inequities in medicine

On Sept. 6, Medical Herstory hosted a virtual Feminist Health Research Conference to discuss the gendered impacts of health and medicine. The event brought together current students and graduates from the University of Cambridge’s MPhil in Health, Medicine and Society to address and explore how gender impacts health and illness.

The conference was split up into two separate panels titled “Disruptive Voices” and “Creating Community,” where speakers highlighted intersectional issues within medicine. In the first, panellists explored how listening to unheard women’s voices can expose institutionalized gender inequity. Panelists discussed how women’s bodies are stereotypically seen as ‘messyor mutilated’ and how this skewed perspective impacts the treatment of women in medicine. The second panel addressed how marginalized individuals have historically formed communities to share their experiences, negotiate, and resist treatment offered by mainstream medical practices. 

Medical Herstory aims to expose structures of sexism, racism, classism, and ableism within medicine and works to counteract traditional healthcare methods by refusing to allow women’s experiences to be erased. Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Medical Herstory Tori Ford, BA ‘19, started the platform as a way to elevate women’s stories and break the stigma surrounding discussions of their bodies. In an email interview with the The McGill Tribune, Ford described the inspiration behind hosting the conference.

“Often in academic spaces, experiences of inequity, illness, and suffering can become sanitized or heavily medicalized,” Ford wrote. “With the Feminist Health Research Conference, we wanted to highlight work that foregrounds lived experience, subverts traditional narratives, or examines how gendered discourses shape health and illness. Applying a feminist lens to clinical encounters, medical treatments, or patient experiences opens up new possibilities for understanding intersecting and interlocking structures of oppression and advocating for change.” 

Panellists spoke about how gender inequality permeates clinical encounters, community formation, and self-esteem. Discussion topics ranged from chronic yeast infections, to off-label drug use, to breastfeeding, to postpartum depression.

A common theme threading through the presentations was the lack of current clinical research on women’s health issues. Panelists also spoke about the difficulty of conducting feminist research given that men have written the majority of existing literature. The stigma surrounding women’s health issues often results in women avoiding medical care and choosing to engage in potentially dangerous self-treatment practices. As a result, they feel that they must often cope alone, and in silence. Medical Herstory’s hopes to highlight positive discussions of women’s bodies rather than their pain. Ford hopes that attendees walked away feeling more educated and excited about the prospects of feminist health research. 

We hope that our attendees left feeling empowered to better understand and undo gender health inequity by applying a feminist lens to their own research, lived experiences, or understandings of gender, health, and illness,” Ford said.

Since Ford’s graduation from McGill, Medical Herstory has continued to expand into university chapters around the world, and the McGill chapter continues to be a community for sharing stories and hosting events to de-stigmatize conversations about womens’ bodies. Medical Herstory is currently working on introducing workshops and is recruiting volunteers for the first time. Their website is open to submissions all year and is currently welcoming new stories.

To learn more, watch the full recorded conference here.

Campus Spotlight, Student Life

Student ingenuity on display at virtual Activities Night

Activities Night has come and gone once again, but this year, there was no standing in line, no Martlet stamps, and no bustling fieldhouse. Activities Night, along with McGill’s many other annual events, was held entirely virtually. On Sept. 9 and 10, students of all years and faculties logged on to learn about the various clubs and organizations that McGill has to offer. As has become the “new normal,” Activities Night was held online through Eventus.io, a virtual career fair service platform that was repurposed to allow each club to show off their services and opportunities to interested students. 

There were 304 clubs in attendance, hosting virtual booths that students could click through to learn more about their missions and future plans. Many clubs, including SSMU Musicians Collective, MealCare McGill, and McGill Students Knitting Club, made promotional videos to outline how they function and how to get involved. Each club also clearly explained how they planned to make the most of their shift to online meetings, events, and fundraisers. Links to Facebook events and signup sheets made it easy to learn about upcoming meetings and activities. The switch to online Activities Night required more work from club members and executives, but the extra effort made for a remarkably engaging experience. 

Club leaders are eager to be back into the swing of things. Many executives spent their summers preparing virtual activities and fundraisers to give new and returning members the best online experience. Danielle Fuchs, U3 Arts, President of Challah for Hunger, is optimistic about her organization’s plans for this semester.

Usually, Challah for Hunger bakes challah in person with dozens of volunteers five times per semester,” Fuchs said. “Then, we sell the challah in various buildings on campus to raise money for charities that fight food insecurity throughout North America.” 

Now that Challah for Hunger has moved completely online, they have had to rethink how their club will function and how they can do the most good while keeping everyone safe. For Fuchs, this means virtual challah bakes and donation-based events like movie nights and workshops. 

Conversely, some clubs have been able to continue with relatively few changes. Democrats Abroad (DA) Vice-President of Communications Cameron Leonard, U3 Arts, is confident about DA’s ability to stay true to their mission. One of the club’s main activities throughout the school year is phone banking, which was an easy virtual transition. 

“[We’ve] hosted several remote phone banking events over Zoom, in which we got together and made calls to American citizens to assist them with requesting their absentee ballots,” Leonard said. “This is not a significant change from the way that we have operated in the past, [as] the only change here is that we are hosting the events virtually.”

 

DA’s strategies for advertisement were not much different from previous years: They created a video for their virtual booth, where they were able to creatively present their organization’s goals, much as they would have in-person. DA has planned for more online events over the course of the semester, and were excited to have the opportunity to share these plans at Activities Night.

The McGill Women in Computer Science Team (McWiCS) shared a similar sentiment. McWiCS Co-President Heather Bosiljevac, U3 Science, is enthusiastic about the club’s ability to successfully transition online. The club was grateful for the opportunity to reach out to those who might have normally shied away from computer science, in hopes of bringing some fresh faces to the upcoming Zoom events. 

Our main goal for Activities Night is simply to get our name out there and invite people to follow us on social media and attend our events,” Bosiljevac said. “Overall, we are really just trying to continue helping people feel more comfortable in [computer science] at McGill, especially incoming first year [students] who may be nervous starting at a new school in this environment.” 

 

Emerging Trends, Student Life

Love in the time of COVID-19

For university students, dating does not always mean heartfelt conversations over candlelit dinners. In fact, dating rarely means going on dates at all. 

Instead, dating can mean late night hookups after long hours spent in the library. It can mean watching Netflix to fill the silence, and avoiding labels in a desperate attempt to keep things casual and to stifle any real emotions that might swell up inside.

But now the COVID-19 pandemic has forced couples to enter relatively unexplored territory: The digital realm, full of awkward Zoom calls and lengthy text conversations. This may not seem like a romantic atmosphere, but, believe it or not, online dating has actually brought many couples closer together despite their physical distance—or maybe because of it. 

To explore this transition into primarily online dating, The McGill Tribune chatted with Julian*, a U2 engineering student. He started hooking up with Nikki* only weeks before the pandemic struck in March. Suddenly, the simplicity of their relationship was gone. Faced with the choice of either breaking up or committing to a long-distance relationship after being together for less than a month, they decided to give long-distance a shot.

Unsurprisingly, long-distance changed the nature of Julian and Nikki’s relationship. With casual encounters no longer an option, the couple had to establish a different kind of intimacy. 

“Since we couldn’t be physical anymore, we started to talk over FaceTime or Zoom almost every day,” Julian said. “It forced us to have real conversations and get to know each other even more. It was nice having her to rely on [during the pandemic.] We grew closer [and] established a [deeper] emotional connection.” 

When Nikki returned to Montreal in July, Julian decided to quarantine with her for two weeks—a commitment he could have never made without hundreds of Zoom calls beforehand. As a result of the pandemic, Julian and Nikki were ready to make a real commitment.

Pierre*, U4 Psychology, was in a similar situation. He and Adele* dated for a couple months before the pandemic, but never made it “official.” 

“I wasn’t comfortable labelling [our relationship] before,” Pierre said. “It was always a grey area.” 

The night before they each left Montreal, Pierre and Adele were finally forced to define what they really were. They agreed that it would be easier to just be friends and stop talking to give each other space to heal.

Only weeks after breaking up, Pierre already regretted his decision. He missed Adele. 

“I didn’t know just how much I cared about her until I stopped talking to her altogether,” Pierre said. “I definitely took our relationship for granted before.” 

After a long month of silence, Pierre finally gained the courage to contact Adele—only to discover that she was planning on reaching out that same day. The two started talking again and agreed that long-distance dating actually brought them closer together than ever before. 

Today, both Pierre and Adele are back in Montreal, but had to wait until the end of Adele’s quarantine to see one another. However, Pierre surprised Adele by making a homemade ice cream cake for her birthday and dropping it off on her back doorstep. 

More stories like Pierre or Julian’s are available on The Social Distance Project. This site gives couples a virtual space to anonymously discuss how the pandemic has altered their dating experiences—either for better or for worse. COVID-19 has left many of us catching feelings like never before, but hopefully feelings will be the only thing you’re catching this fall.

*Last names omitted for privacy.

McGill, News

Scholars strike to call for an end to systemic racism within academic institutions

Scholars across Canada and the United States took part in a collective action on Sept. 9 and Sept. 10 to protest anti-Black, anti-Indigenous, and colonial violence within academic institutions. Known as the Scholar Strike, workers in academia boycotted normal class schedules for the two-day period to organize teach-ins on police violence and social justice.

The Scholar Strike initiative, which calls for an end to anti-Black police violence and discrimination within academia, was initiated in the U.S. by Dr. Anthea Butler, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Butler’s call for a strike was motivated by the recent actions by players in the NBA and WNBA, who boycotted games in response to police brutality in the U.S. and Canada. Butler then started the Scholar Strike initiative on Twitter.

As in the United States, thousands of Canadian scholars took this opportunity to advocate for an end to systemic racism. Additionally, Scholar Strike Canada was dedicated to addressing systemic and institutional forms of violence, which have resulted in the underrepresentation of Black and Indigenous scholars and students in Canadian institutions.

Aziz Choudry, a professor in the Faculty of Education, has been involved in

anti-racist and anti-colonial activism since the 1980s. Choudry spoke to the Tribune about his participation in Scholar Strike Canada and highlighted McGill University’s own institutional racism.

I’m supporting Scholar Strike Canada as one action in the ongoing fight against racism and colonialism that those of us working in universities can take part in by interrupting ‘business as usual’ and uplifting anti-racist education work as the new university term starts up,” Choudry said. “Institutional racism continues to permeate McGill, Canadian higher education institutions, and broader Canadian society. At McGill, the struggles and work of racialized students, faculty, and staff against racism have been frequently erased or forgotten. Much of the anti-racist work has been and continues to be done by relatively few racialized faculty.”

Dr. Mehri Ghazanjani, a professor in the Department of Sociology, stated that her participation in Scholar Strike Canada provided professors with the opportunity to educate their students on forms of systemic racism that exist within post-secondary education.

“[The] Scholar Strike for Black lives in Canada has been a great teaching and learning moment for all of us,” Ghazanjani said. “Not only should we stand in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement, but we also should take it upon ourselves to understand and respond to social injustices in our society. The teach-ins provided us with an important opportunity to learn more about systemic [and] inferential racism and discrimination and to reflect upon our role in it. It is time to stand together and push for long-overdue changes in our institutions.”

Canadian educational institutions, including McGill University, occupy unceded traditional territories of Indigenous Peoples and have a long-standing history of racial and institutional discrimination. Scholar Strike Canada hopes that their actions will call attention to systemic racism, as well as educate individuals in the hopes of sparking progresisve change.  

For Robin Vochelet, a U4 Arts student, the Scholar Strike’s provided an opportunity to have an important conversation about dismantling stereotypes and discriminatory academic structures.

“I genuinely believe there’s a need for a discussion on the way academia perpetuates white supremacy,” Vochelet said. “To me, this is a crucial point that we need to keep in mind moving forward in our academic careers, mostly because Canada is too often deemed as better than the United States regarding systemic racism. It is about time we break these harmful stereotypes down and start working on building an environment that is, in fact, inclusive and free of systemic racism.”

McGill, News

McGill Max Bell graduate student bridges borders with comparative policy tool

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a graduate student at McGill’s Max Bell School of Public Policy to create the Bridging Borders project, an interactive policy tool that compares the effectiveness of pandemic response plans from regions around the world. Since the project started in May, graduate student Henna Hundal and Sai Rajagopal have interviewed the Prime Ministers and Presidents of over 40 countries on camera about their responses to the pandemic.

Both Hundal and Rajagopal studied and conducted research at Harvard University during their undergraduate years. Hundal’s academic background in health policy and clinical medicine and Rajagopal’s studies in biomedical and mechanical engineering provided them with the experience necessary to develop Bridging Borders. When the COVID-19 pandemic started affecting regions of the United States differently, Hundal and Rajagopal sought to compare how policy responses and epidemiological outcomes varied from state to state. Recently, their project has expanded to include countries around the world.

“When we saw that some developed countries had worse policy responses than the developing countries in which we worked, we realized there was a space in which to inform listeners about COVID-19 policy responses across borders,” Rajagopal wrote in an email to The McGill Tribune. “That’s how the project was born.”

By interviewing international leaders directly, the Bridging Borders project has brought attention to regions of the world that are not regularly discussed in mainstream media. Discussions with President Jonathan Nez of the Navajo Nation and Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. of the Cherokee Nation highlighted the importance of facilitating dialogue within communities hit harder by the COVID-19 pandemic, and outlining the infrastructural issues that have contributed to these regional differences. 

“Those stories don’t get reported,” Hundal said. “There’s all these nuances and granularities that the [Bridging Borders] program is able to reveal. We’re hoping that after this pandemic we get serious about solving some of these issues.”

Weekly interviews with global leaders posted to the Bridging Borders website provide the primary data needed to create their comprehensive policy comparison tool. Launching on Sept. 18., the tool examines the policies implemented by each country, such as social distancing guidelines and mask and quarantine decrees. These policies are overlaid with the caseload and death charts of each region, so that users can see the effectiveness of different public health guidelines in real-time. 

Director of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada and professor of Political Science Daniel Béland shared his perspective on the Bridging Borders project.

“The various episodes posted on the website features interviews with world leaders and policymakers that allow us to better understand both the global and the local COVID-related public health and policy challenges [that] they face,” Béland wrote in an email to the Tribune. “COVID-19 is a global pandemic but the policy responses can vary significantly across the world, and taking stock of fast-evolving national strategies to cope with COVID-19 is potentially important to improve responses to current and future pandemics.”  

The Bridging Borders project focusses on core questions during each interview, including asking leaders about the severity of the pandemic in their own countries or regions, the death tolls, and what basic measures have been implemented since the onset of the pandemic. With the help of listener feedback, the project has worked to better contextualize their interviews, and aims to give users a more well-rounded picture of what the pandemic response is like in a given region.

“We’ve been very pleased by the level of engagement among the leaders who are interested in coming together on this platform and pooling their policy ideas,” Hundal said. “That’s a function also of the need to work together during a pandemic. It’s not a problem that stops at borders.” 

All of the Bridging Borders’s interview episodes can be found on their website. Episodes are released weekly and the project’s policy tool will be updated as each episode is uploaded. Bridging Borders can also be found on social media with @bridgingbordersproject on Instagram, and with @bridgingproject on Twitter.

A previous version of this article stated that Sai Rajagopal is a graduate student at the Max Bell School of Public Policy. In fact, only Henna Hundal is a student at Max Bell. The Tribune regrets this error.

public health
Science & Technology

Unearthing an epidemic: The birth of Canadian public health

Diseases are one of humanity’s greatest blind spots, an enemy that always reappears. Fears of loss and death can lead to dramatic societal turmoil, from economic troubles to civil unrest. They remain, however, pivotal moments in history, providing valuable opportunities for comparisons between past and present disease management tactics. 

A team of archaeologists were recently called to document the remains of a 19th-century church discovered by construction workers underneath a parking lot in the district of Sainte-Rose, Laval. The archeologists carefully recorded the outlines of the old church, cemetery walls, and graves in what was once the churchyard.

Interestingly, the team observed that the graves were small, tightly packed, and located quite close to the surface. By accessing the cemetery’s records, which spanned from 1788 to 1890, they learned that over 7000 people were buried in the small plot, primarily children less than a year old. The archeologists also noticed an intriguing spike in deaths on two occasions, in 1832 and 1834. Archeologist Justine Tétreault tied these spikes to dates in the church records. 

“Well, we know the exact numbers [of burials] through records, but what we saw on the site is a very high density of burial pits,” Tétreault said in an interview with The McGill Tribune

In fact, the 1830s were pivotal in the history of public health in Canada. In 1832 and 1834, two cholera epidemics swept through North America, causing mass casualties in Lower Canada—now Quebec and Labrador.  

Cholera is a gastrointestinal disease caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Highly infectious, it causes diarrhea, massive dehydration, and is often deadly. In the early 1800s, however, the cause of the illness was still unknown.

In the winter of 1831, government officials in Lower Canada learned that cholera had hit the British Isles and could spread to Canada. This information effectively prompted the birth of Canadian public health legislations, culminating in Canada’s first Quarantine Act in 1872. The famous Grosse-Île quarantine station was established during the 1832 epidemic to mitigate the impact of cholera’s arrival. 

Despite these newly implemented measures, the illness’s toll was devastating. Cholera claimed over 5,000 lives in Lower Canada alone, a significant loss for a region with a total population of only 500,000 residents at the time. Jean-Philip Mathieu, a PhD candidate in the Department of History and Classical Studies, noted that fear was prevalent in the population at the time. 

“It was a catastrophe for human health. It was absolutely catastrophic,” Mathieu said in an interview with the Tribune. “This was a major fear for people. It strained the system of proper Christian burials because the mortality rate doubled over a few months.” 

Frightened and underprepared, Canadians were left to improvise. Government officials responded by creating a Board of Health, but also fired cannons and burned tar to cleanse the air—a futile effort, especially when fighting a waterborne pathogen. As with the COVID-19 pandemic of today, people dreaded the misunderstood disease, and their fear translated into a distrust of the government and other experts.

“The improvisation of trying to deal with this [pandemic is] very familiar,” Mathieu said. “People not complying, not following directives, not trusting doctors. A major thing people [thought was] that doctors [were] actually giving them cholera—there’s a distrust of expertise. There are a lot of commonalities [with COVID-19], and all pandemics have certain things in common.”

The apprehension caused by an unknown disease now seems eerily familiar. Yet, throughout history, epidemics and pandemics have always brought about two things: Tragedy and change. Many of the health measures implemented in 1832 persisted far beyond the end of the outbreak.

“This particular epidemic really changed things,” Mathieu said. “People realized how improvisational this was, and that you need better planning and better regulations because you [can’t] escape epidemic disease [….] And a quarantine station is just one example of that, of these governments with very limited tools and technologies, [and without] a very strong state structure. I think that’s really important contextually.”

History is cyclical. Every so often, we unearth glimpses of the past that help us understand similar experiences of those who came before. Today, like in 1832, it may seem as though the world lingers in a perpetual state of fear, distrust, and uncertainty. Yet, these same fears will push experts to change the face of public health, even if such changes only become visible in retrospect, 200 years from now.

Montreal, News

Dozens gather at Palais de Justice de Montréal to protest against recent PEQ reform

 

Approximately 50 people gathered by the steps of the Palais de Justice de Montréal on Sept. 12 to protest the recent reform of the Québec Experience Program (PEQ). The small but vocal crowd cheered speakers on while remaining socially distant. The protest was organized by the activist group Le Québec c’est nous aussi, which advocates for inclusivity in Quebec.

 The PEQ reform, implemented on July 22, has tightened the immigration program’s eligibility conditions, requiring increased work experience for international students and temporary foreign workers in Quebec. 

 Andrés Fontecilla, a Québec Solidaire Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) for Laurier-Dorion, spoke with verve about his opposition to the new reforms. 

“[With] the reforms being fundamentally unjust, there are always reasons for us to mobilize […] and we will mobilize […] until we correct the principal injustices of this program,” Fontecilla said.  

Fontecilla also outlined the group’s principal demands to the CAQ government.

“[The government] must respect its word,” Fontecilla said. “The Quebec Premier François Legault and the former Immigration Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette gave their personal word as minister and Premier [that] international students would have a granted right [to work]. This means that, despite the reforms, the people that are already here will be able to apply following the old rules of the PEQ program. [The government] has to respect its promise. It is a state promise.”

Ramatoulaye Diallo, treasurer at the Conseil central du Montréal métropolitain-CSN, an organization that represents the rights of over 100,000 workers from nearly 400 syndicates across Montreal, explained the importance of standing up for foreign students and workers.

“Fighting against injustice is what we do,” Diallo said. “[We’re] here today because we think that the PEQ reform is an unjust reform towards racialized people and […] immigrants.”

Diallo noted the importance of foreign students to Quebec, highlighting that their participation in the economy is undervalued by the CAQ government.

“My impression is that if we create an injustice like this, we will be missing workers, and in that sense, it can affect my work,” Diallo said. “I want young people, especially young graduates to be able to come here in Quebec and to be able to find work [so that] they can contribute to the development of this country.”

Saïd Apali, who is part of the Syndicat des étudiants salariés de Montréal, felt that while his syndicate represents many international student workers at the University of Montreal, he took part in the protest because he believes it is also an important social cause. 

“There are already many studies that demonstrate that people who are ethnic minorities […] and women […] face structural barriers on the labour market, that are discriminated against, [be it] direct, indirect, or systemic,” Apali said. “But now [instead of helping], the Legault government is saying, ‘we will put even more barriers’ […] which will make it even harder to integrate into the labour market [….] We see that this has many different ideological motives and that these are racist ideological motives.”

Fontecilla explained that the PEQ reform, which was introduced by the CAQ in mid-July, was able to pass under the radar because the public was primarily focused on the pandemic.

“[The government] profited […] from when everyone had their eyes turned towards the healthcare system, the CHSLD, and the number of [COVID-19] deaths,” Fontecilla said. “The government, especially the former Immigration Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette took profit from this to pass the reform in […] hiding—and his operation hasn’t worked—but he’s profiting from the mediatic attention being elsewhere to pass this reform. It’s a rather sad political tactic, pretty unimaginative, but heck, it’s politics.”

All interviews were conducted in French and translated by the author.

Every week is a busy week for SSMU clubs and services (Simon Poitrimolt / McGill Tribune)
McGill, News, SSMU

SSMU Clubs and Services forced to adapt amid COVID-19 regulations

While students around the world have begun to adjust to the new normal of online classes and socially-distanced gatherings, the COVID-19 pandemic still affects almost every aspect of our lives. In particular, the pandemic has impacted student’s social interactions, including their ability to participate in clubs and societies. Activities night, held on Sept. 9 and 10, transitioned from being a gym jam-packed with booths into an online portal where students could sign up to interact with the clubs they were interested in.

Student-run clubs not only serve as convenient ways for students to meet others with similar interests, but also create opportunities for students to escape their daily class schedules. Furthermore, clubs serve as ways for students to help their communities or be exposed to and work within more specific fields.

MEDLIFE McGill, a club dedicated to advocating for accessible education and healthcare globally, is one of many student organizations impacted by COVID-19. MEDLIFE McGill’s Vice-President of Finance and Sponsorship Elise Goncalves explained how McGill’s transition to online learning has affected the club from running as it once had. 

“Our meetings have gone online,” Goncalves said. “We use Slack to talk to each other and regular Zoom meetings to keep each other up-to-date, [whereas], we used to hand [out] flyers […] and set up booths on campus to raise awareness for our cause.”

One of the more notable barriers to the club has been the lack of opportunities for outreach, as the only readily available communication tools are Facebook and Instagram. This has made it more difficult for MEDLIFE McGill to collect donations, as normal fundraising activities are not feasible due to COVID-19 regulations. 

There have, however, been some positive aspects to the transition to online platforms. MEDLIFE McGill hosted an online Q&A session in which students were able to ask questions relating to the club. In addition, MEDLIFE McGill also hosted an Instagram fundraiser, where team executives completed challenges to reach fundraising goals. 

Krista Mahler, the co-chair of McGill Students for UN Women, explained how their fundraisers were similarly affected by the move to virtual resources. 

“We have been trying to accustom our club [members] to virtual changes,” Mahler said. “We will hold events and panel discussions online. It has been hard to generate money for the club itself, including being able to donate our money. Moving forward, [McGill Students for UN Women] will be doing virtual volunteer work, like sending letters out to women’s shelters, particularly Chez Doris, to create ties and inspire them.” 

Another organization that has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic is Desautels Management Achievement Awards (DMAA). Kaitlyn Lynch, the director of Marketing, expressed that DMAA would be forced to reconsider how it would host events.

“Our club works towards having an event in February, an award ceremony, which was held at the Four Seasons [hotel] last year,” Lynch said. “We don’t know whether or not that is going to happen in-person yet. We have been looking at alternatives for the event and [whether we will] still be able to get sponsorship money to hold this event, but right now it is all up in the air.” 

Although the pandemic forced student clubs to implement new methods of outreach, it is not all negative. The silver lining comes from developing more creative strategies that can reach a wider audience, such as the use of listservs, social media, and online events. Online meetings and events also allow students to avoid commuting to campus, and makes it more convenient and easier for students to get involved. It remains to be seen if these strategies will continue after the pandemic and as life returns back to normal.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue