Latest News

Editorial, Opinion

On sexual violence policy reform, it’s McGill’s turn

by McGill Tribune Editorial Board on

More in Editorial:

In the 2018 Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, McGill was the second best school in Canada. Maclean’s just named the university the number one medical and doctoral school in Canada, for the 13th year in a row.

In contrast, last week the inter-university student group Our Turn gave McGill’s Policy Against Sexual Violence—passed in November 2016—a C-.

The group’s report, distributed by the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) on Oct. 11, provides a comparative, quantitative analysis of the sexual violence policies at 14 universities across Canada, out of which McGill placed eighth.

The report provides a set of concrete recommendations for improvement, developed through consultations with sexual assault survivors, existing comprehensive policies, and experts in best practices in preventing and responding to sexual violence. It provides a standardized, central resource on what an ideal campus sexual assault policy should—and should not—look like. It is survivor-focused, emphasizing the need for multiple avenues of support for survivors of sexual violence, while also attempting to take on the prior causes of sexual assault on campus, such as a lack of education and the pervasiveness of rape culture. It’s an entirely student-driven initiative, and miles ahead of lagging and bare-bones provincial legislation on this issue.

More crucially, however, the report is a vital reminder of the real and unacceptable prevalence of sexual assault on university campuses. A comprehensive policy framework to combat campus sexual assault, which includes preventative, educational, and survivor support measures, is essential, and must be treated as such. That means, chiefly, that just having a policy in place isn’t enough. Students, SSMU, and the McGill administration also need to work to ensure that McGill’s policy actually works, by bringing it closer to the ambitious national threshold that Our Turn sets. By extension, it must be able to evolve to better meet the needs of the students affected by sexual violence and sexual assault on campus.

 

 

As the necessity and existence of Our Turn shows, progress on preventing campus sexual violence falls primarily on affected campus communities themselves.

Our Turn originated with the experience of Carleton University students. The group of students that would go on to form Our Turn advocated for reform of the school’s sexual violence policy, through a widely supported open letter. The policy’s final draft failed to reflect these student concerns. This led to an ongoing campaign from students to a deaf administration, geared at reopening the policy for revamp. 

The experience of Carleton students matches the story at many universities. When McGill’s sexual violence policy was drafted and subsequently approved by Senate, it was widely criticized. Many flagged concerns about its clarity on concrete reforms, as well as transparency in the student consultation and amendment process. Those concerns were well-placed, as later confirmed by Our Turn’s abysmal review.

Our Turn is an invaluable resource. In the absence of any national legislation or inquiry on campus sexual assault, by taking the issue beyond the scope of McGill—or any one campus, for that matter—the inter-school group has made it a national concern. Moreover, it solidifies and amplifies the message coming from students to their university administrations and governments: Sexual violence on campus is a pervasive threat to student safety and wellbeing, and needs to be addressed.

The nature of sexual violence presents unique challenges from an administrative standpoint, but it can also present dire harm to survivors and affected students. As a survivor-centered, independent, and dedicated body, Our Turn sets the bar above and beyond that of any one single university attending to other institutional concerns. While exact criteria may be up for debate, the value of having any substantive, national standard of support for sexual assault survivors cannot be overstated.

McGill must respond to the recommendations of the report, and set a timeline on how it will update its policy accordingly. The existing Policy Against Sexual Violence is subject to triennial review. Given that it is sitting at a C-, that time frame is insufficient.

SSMU, meanwhile, needs to follow through on its pledge to the organization, by implementing its campus advocacy task force and setting in motion the suggested reforms at the McGill Senate level.

For their part, students ought to take the time to read the report, conduct further research on best practices across campuses, and critically consider where McGill's Policy Against Sexual Violence is at right now, and where it needs to be. As the necessity and existence of Our Turn shows, progress on preventing campus sexual violence falls primarily on affected campus communities themselves. Provincial and federal government actors need to address the gaps in existing provincial campus sexual assault legislation. But, until they do, university administrations, student unions, and students themselves need to continue to lead the push for education and awareness on campus, and due resources and support for sexual violence survivors. To borrow a phrase, it’s our turn.

A previous version of this article incorrectly said that Our Turn originated at Ryerson—it in fact originated at Carleton. The McGill Tribune regrets this error. 

 

 

 

@mcgilltribop | [email protected]

 

 
McGill, News

Philosopher Charles Taylor delivers 2017 Beatty Memorial Lecture

by Elijah Wenzel on

More in McGill:

On Oct. 12, philosopher Professor Emeritus Charles Taylor delivered the 2017 Beatty Memorial Lecture “The Challenge of Regressive Democracy,” at Pollack Hall. Taylor discussed recent nativist and populist waves in Western politics and their impact on major events such as Brexit and the 2016 general election in the United States. A McGill alumnus,Taylor’s career has spanned over 50 years, during which he has published over a dozen books and essays, including the influential works of philosophy Sources of the Self and A Secular Age.

In an interview with The McGill Tribune prior to his lecture, Taylor discussed the causes of the wave of nativism sweeping Western democracies. While nativism explicitly signifies preferential treatment of those native-born in a country, Taylor explained what he considers a trend similar to nativism that accompanies these movements, narrowing the definition of who is really a member of the society.

“[Nativism is] the idea that some of us are the real Americans, some of us are the real French, and the other ones are really a danger to us,” Taylor said.

Taylor also acknowledged that nativism could hold influence in Canada.

“Well, perhaps not Canada, and perhaps not even Quebec, is totally succumbing [to nativism],” Taylor said. “But let’s say there could be some gains in Quebec on the part of Parti Québécois and  [the Coalition Avenir Québec] CAQ who have both been leaning in this direction. That is they are trying to surf on certain deep fears and prejudices against a segment of the population.”

Taylor began his lecture by noting that the idea of democracy representing constant progress toward a more just society is a misconception. Yet, in his time as a scholar, he’s grown to view this reality with optimism.

“Democracy is not an escalator going up,” Taylor said. “Democracy is a progressive struggle. If you believe in the [progressive] escalator, it sounds devastating. If you cease believing in the escalator, it could even be exhilarating.”

According to Taylor, the word democracy has two meanings. One can lead to power sliding from the common people to the elites.

“Democracy is actually going to be understood as the interpretation of two concepts with the same word,” Taylor said. “The concept of the people as a whole, all embracing, and the concept of the people as those who are disadvantaged, because they are not part of the elite [….] Among the countries that we think of as democracies in that sense, big issues arise as to the degree of elite control [….] And this is something that can never be resolved once and for all.”

Taylor’s words left a strong mark on those who watched him. In a message to the Tribune, Jing Ming Yuan, U2 Engineering student who attended the lecture, expressed his agreement with Taylor’s points about democracy as an escalator.

“I think [Taylor] made a very good point when he stated that democracy is not a one-way escalator always going forward,” Yuan wrote. “There is no natural law stating that political institutions would invariably evolve to become, say, more tolerant […] although we tend to think that the present is better than the past, we should acknowledge the possibility that even the most democratic governments in the world can, at times, slide backward and become more unequal and intolerant.”

McGill Philosophy Professor Sarah Stroud also found both Taylor’s presence and insight to be valuable.

“Charles Taylor is a towering philosopher and public intellectual,” Stroud wrote in a message to the Tribune. “His inspiring vision of the democracy we could have will help us right the ship, currently listing dangerously.”

Student Life, The Tribune Tries

The Tribune Tries: Buying groceries on a $40 budget

by Mary Keith on

More in Student Life:

One of the many necessities of transitioning from adolescence to adulthood is learning how to budget. This is something that I’ve always struggled with: Most recently, for three consecutive weeks, I bought lunch on campus every day despite having food at home that I’d simply forgotten to pack. Now that I’m in my fourth year of university—and will soon be entering the wild world of post-grad financial independence—I’m attempting to adopt a thriftier lifestyle; cutting these frequent take-out foods is a step in this direction. So, this September, I set a goal for myself: Spend $40 on groceries, and make the food last for two weeks.

I’m privileged to admit that I’ve never had trouble getting food on the table. Plenty of people are limited to strict grocery budgets like this one on a regular basis—I’m fortunate that this was a unique experience for me, and one that I chose to embark on, rather than having to out of economic necessity. Ultimately, I walked away from the experience with more than groceries; I learned a lot about budgeting that I plan to take with me after graduation.

I found that the key to cutting costs during market visits was to purchase non-perishables; these items can last for weeks on end and are relatively cheap compared to fresh foods. My non-perishables took up a lot of space in my shopping cart: I bought rice, a 12-pack box of oatmeal, peanut butter, frozen vegetables, and black beans. The remaining space in my cart was left for a dozen eggs, frozen spinach, three apples, five bananas, a pack of English muffins, and the cheapest chicken I could find. It was difficult to purchase any fresh vegetables because they certainly would not survive two weeks worth of rationing, and unfortunately, my Häagan Daaz addiction took a full stop because of their extremely high pint prices. Limiting my normal grocery expenditure would not have been feasible without pre-planning what to buy—and sticking to it—at the store. All in all, my grocery bill came to a total of $35.24, which gave me room to buy a second pack of English muffins and three more apples in the second week. The grand total amounted to $41.19—only slightly over budget.

Once I bought all of my groceries, the next step was to meal plan and prep. For the duration of the two weeks, I planned to eat either eggs or oatmeal for breakfast every day, a toasted English muffin with peanut butter and fruit for lunch, and some variation of rice, beans, vegetables, and chicken for dinner. In order to save time and energy in the evenings, I pre-cooked all of my rice, chicken, and beans. This way, I was able to ration out my food over the course of a week, while also saving myself from eating a jar of peanut butter if I got too lazy to cook.

To be honest, there was not much variation in my meals, but I knew I couldn’t be too picky when it came to breakfast and lunch. However, eating basically the same dinner each night definitely got boring, so I tried to create different meals from the same ingredients: Fried rice for one night, baked chicken for another, and rice and beans for the remaining evenings. Yes, my dinner options were limited, but I learned that eating while on a tight budget was not going to give me much creative cooking freedom.

I managed to get through these two weeks with relative success, so I tried another two weeks after that, and this time, my roommate tried it with me. We decided to share groceries, and this was a game-changer. Splitting groceries—and costs—allowed for plenty more options. We split the bill for non-perishable foods and were then able to add hummus, crackers, carrots, peas, butternut squash, and sour cream to the mix. Now, we had mid-day snacks, and even got to make vegetable soups with dollops of sour cream; it was practically heaven after the bland first two weeks, yet still within our budgets.

Though it was tough to get used to at first, buying groceries on a $40 bi-weekly budget became easier with time. If there are three lessons to take from this, it’s that non-perishables are crucial for reducing costs, meal prepping helps you get through the week, and sharing groceries and meals allows for a larger variety of food options. Whether big or small, accomplishing a goal takes discipline, commitment, and in my case, a bag of rice.

Arts & Entertainment, content warning ed, Film and TV

Flashback: ‘Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story’ is mandatory viewing for McGill students, administrators alike

by Dylan Adamson on

More in Arts & Entertainment:

Mental health issues, and eating disorders in particular—being consistently gendered feminine—are exacerbated, downplayed, and ignored by patriarchal institutions. Frustration on the part of the victimized is understandable, and art can justifiably be deemed escapist in essence. Conversely, I present to you: Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story (1987), a movie that refuses to allow marginalized voices to be silenced, or their stories to go untold.

Todd Haynes’ (Carol (2015), Wonderstruck (2017)) film school debut takes an unconventional approach to the subject of famed pop star Karen Carpenter. As one half of the ‘70s brother-sister duo, The Carpenters, Karen’s meteoric rise to American pop icon status intensified pre-existing issues with body image. Coupled with a controlling home environment, her condition led to her eventual demise in 1983, when she suffered cardiac arrest from complications arising from anorexia nervosa. Playing off associations with oppressive standards of femininity, Superstar is cast entirely with Barbie dolls, complete with handmade props and real dollhouse sets.

Although his characters are developed with a warmth and compassion normally reserved for, you know, real people, Haynes never asks you to look past the soft vinyl cast of characters. As Karen’s initial insecurities and dieting spiral into laxative addiction and self-starvation, Haynes carved her figure down with a scalpel, scene by scene, to replicate the emaciated appearance of critical anorexic patients. His singular creative casting choice alludes to the oppressive body standards women face from infancy, and calls attention to the plastic-perfect ideological image of Nixon-era America that The Carpenters’ music came to represent. It’s difficult to imagine a better representation of The Carpenters’ white bread conservatism than Superstar’s Barbie/Ken-populated dollhouse.

Haynes splices his film with ‘60s style educational videos, featuring an eerily cheerful, somewhat robotic woman’s voice reading medical definitions of anorexia, and black-font captions, fading in and out of the moving background. Contributing a sense of documentary realism, these segments verbalize the film’s unabashedly feminist mission—insistently placing Carpenter’s body at the feet of twin-bros patriarchy and capitalism.

As a (former) casual Carpenters fan, approaching the iconic duo only through the equally iconic Simpsons Movie soundtrack (2007), the film’s use of their saccharine pop hits was nothing short of revelatory. Writer-director Todd Haynes—who would go on to pioneer the New Queer cinema movement of the ‘90s—made this film about Nixon-era harmful ideologies that resurfaced during his own Reagan-era film school years.

The film’s feminist sentiment rings true in our own context, with eating disorders clearly continuing to fly under institutional radars. Recently editorialized in The McGill Tribune’s opinion section, McGill Student Services’ September overhaul (read: Gutting) of its already much maligned Eating Disorder Program attempted to restructure the service with an eye to balancing accessibility and efficiency. Rationalized in a statement to the Tribune which reads better as a math equation than an apology, McGill’s handling of some of its most at-risk students can best be characterized as ruthlessly utilitarian. This recent maneuver fits snugly within McGill’s recent pattern of downsizing the care that the administration is willing to offer its students in need, and more broadly speaking, the inclination of patriarchal institutions to minimize the effects of mental illness on individuals. As McGill students can attest, Carpenter’s story is but one of many. But as long as patriarchal structures ignore these problems, artists like Haynes will continue to fight for space for those on the margins.

Removed from circulation in 1990 due to copyright infringement for its use of The Carpenters’ music, 'Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story’ is available only in bootlegged form on YouTube and Dailymotion.

 

Features

Confiture unleashed

by Ava Zwolinski on

More in Features:

‘Confiture’ means ‘jam’ in French. At McGill, however the word has a different meaning: Confiture is a 40-kilogram Great Pyrenees dog, born in Japan, with a Facebook group that counts over 1,000 members. He loves walking into bushes and barks whenever his walker pauses for more than a few seconds. Since the Winter 2016 semester, he has kept a jam-packed schedule of walks by McGill student volunteers.

Arts & Entertainment, content warning, Theatre

TNC’s ‘Owners’ explores the dynamics of “dis/possession”

by Avleen K Mokha on

More in Arts & Entertainment:

Tuesday Night Cafe Theatre (TNC) is a McGill theatre company run entirely by students. Its first production of this season, Owners, is a tragic exploration of love, temptation, and ambition in the age of late capitalism. Written by  Caryl Churchill in 1972, Owners is a a two-act play about obsession with power. In his directorial debut, Olivier Bishop-Mercier (U3, Theatre Studies and Math) brings the production to stage at Morrice Hall. Ambitious albeit amateurish, TNC’s production of Owners is not a stellar rendition—but not a total miss either.

As a part of ARTiFACT, TNC’s monthly interdisciplinary and inclusive performing space, Owners takes up this month’s theme of dis/possession. The plot sets up two main levels of exploring this theme. First is the gendered and financial conflict between Clegg (Andrew Young, U3 History), a misogynistic butcher, and his wife, Marion (Sara Harvey, U2 Theatre Studies), a well-off real estate agent, whom he is planning to kill. Simultaneously, we have Marion’s plot to force out poor tenants, Alec (Guillaume Doussin, U4 Management) and Lisa (Emily Sheeran, U1 Arts), to make way for a more profitable housing upgrade.

Compared to his cohort, Alec is uniquely unmotivated by desire. It is for this very reason that he is the most likeable of the characters. Alec’s arch balances borderline slapstick comedy—he dozes off after a major burglary, with more sinister plot points, such as revealing how he became disillusioned with his life, doing his character’s nihilistic disposition justice. The actors also pull off culturally-specific variations of an English accent; Young’s rough drawl adds credibility to his persona of the rowdy, controlling butcher. With a dominant stage presence, Harvey’s portrayal of Marion, the go-getter agent, is fiercely magnetic.

Set designers Riki Shimoda and Alizee Millot built compact interior spaces that created an insulating, claustrophobic effect. The muted red and yellow palette of the lighting (Shimoda) complements the grittiness of the set design. Additionally, the use of props is minimal, and their significance is not always clear. Alec’s mother (Asha Bittender, U2 Arts) wears a textured white mask throughout the play, but the production does not overtly elaborate on its meaning, nor venture into mask work with other characters.

Morrice Halls’s ample stage space feels underutilized at times, especially in scenes that involve multiple characters on stage at once. Their positioning is poorly choreographed, and actors sometimes walk behind each other, blocking their facial expressions and obstructing their speech. One scene, which takes place in a seedy strip club, stands out as an exception; Bishop-Mercier’s direction complements Marion and Worsely’s plotting at the downstage while Clegg enjoys a lap dance in the background, creating a meaningful scene that highlights the disjointed communication between the married but loveless couple.

TNC’s newsletter for Owners gives a content warning for “themes of mental illness and suicide.” Marion’s depressive employee (Sam Miller, exchange student Arts), makes one suicide attempt after another in an unsettlingly comedic fashion. Another major element of the play that viewers should be aware of before stepping in, however, are the patterns of gendered abuse.

At two hours long, the production sometimes feels slow paced; the shortening or removal of some scenes might have allowed for more compact storytelling. The climax of the story is not predictable, and its message is not hopeful; the play ends on a sinister note, but Bishop-Mercier’s rendition effectively undercuts the closing moment with a comedic irony that captures the heart of the plot. Characters in Owners do not learn any lessons by the end; in characteristic postmodern fashion, the play gives no clear answers, but raises challenging, subversive questions that its viewers can take home.

Owners runs from October 11-14 and 18-21 at Morrice Hall, Islamic Building. Tickets are $6 for students and QDF members (with card), and $10 for general admission. To reserve tickets, email [email protected].

 

ABCs of Science, Science & Technology

What’s under the hood? The ins and outs of your laptop

by Benji Taubenblatt on

More in ABCs of Science:

When most people think about computers, only a couple of images come to mind: A laptop or a desktop with internet-browsing capabilities.

However, a computer is much more than a tool for browsing Facebook feeds or doing school work. A computer is an information processor. It takes in raw information which is stored, later to be synthesized into a final result. This definition encompasses anything from a phone, to a digital camera.

First, an information processor takes in data in the form of an input. Inputs are any form of information given to a computer program. For example, the key strokes from your keyboard are keyboard inputs.

Next, the computer then stores this information in the form of memory until it is ready for use. There are two main types of storage that computers typically use: Solid state disk (SSD) storage and hard disk drives (HDD).

“A solid state drive is a larger, more sophisticated version of your traditional thumb drive,” Data Security, Inc.’s website states.

According to Data Security Inc., a SSD stores information on flash memory chips and thus is fixed while a HDD records data in the form of binary (0s and 1s) on magnetic disks. A HDD utilizes a mechanical arm and a spinning disk to read and write information to memory. Although both HDDs and SSDs both retain data when there is no power, most modern computers use SSDs due to their processing speed.

Once a computer is ready to work on some data, it will prompt the Memory Management Unit (MMU) to swap a copy of the information out of secondary storage (SSD or HDD) and into main memory, or Random Access Memory (RAM), where the processor can access the data more readily when needed.

After data is moved into main memory for processing, a microchip called the Central Processing Unit (CPU) will start performing rapid calculations on the information causing it to heat up. Finally, once the CPU is done processing the information, it will send the altered data out in the form of output.

Chris Woodford, a science author, explained how fundamental the process is to computer function.

“Everything a computer does, from helping you […] edit a photograph you've taken with a digital camera, to displaying a web page, involves manipulating numbers in one way or another,” Woodford wrote on his website.

A computer performs these calculations through an algorithm, or a series of instructions on how to solve a problem. Solving with an algorithm is like a recipe for baking a cake. In this way, a computer program is a series of instructions your computer follows automatically when prompted. This freedom seen in computer programs is what distinguishes software from hardware. Hardware is hard coded and difficult to change while software is malleable and promotes creativity.

The operating system (OS), or the ‘brain’ of your computer, manages all of the above functions, and controls the basic functionality of input, output, processing, and storage. Even the operating system has its own ‘brain’ called the kernel, which both handles low-level tasks such as memory management and interfaces between the OS and the hardware. Applications on your computer depend on the OS to carry out their chores and computations. For example, both playing an online game of solitaire and typing an essay on microsoft word rely on the OS to execute their functions.

Years of effort, research, and experimentation resulted in laptops as we know and love today, and users would benefit from understanding how these machines function.

Science & Technology

From beeps to dancing: The effect of the motor system on auditory input

by River Ludwick on

More in Science & Technology:

In a recent study, Benjamin Morillon, a researcher at the Montreal Neurological Institute of McGill University and Sylcain Baillet, the head of the Lab at MNI that lead the study, took a look at the surprising relationship between the auditory system and the motor cortex of the brain. Both of these systems are just different ways to describe how the brain takes an input—like a compression of the eardrum from sound—and transfers it to the region of the brain where it can be deciphered and interpreted. Previous studies have shown that when the brain picks up on a sound and detects a rhythm, it’s physical pathways sync to that rhythm in order to process them.

Morillon and Baillet’s study aimed to disconnect an external rhythm from an internal representation, artificially separating noise stimuli outside the brain from the temporal rhythm inside the brain.

Baillet’s lab recruited participants and played two series of melodic beeps to carry out their study. The first beep-set was a melodic sequence of beeps that the participant had to keep track of, while the second placed extra beeps around the melodic target ones to act as distraction. The researchers observed participants’ abilities to judge whether the target melodies were higher or lower pitched than the reference beeps given beforehand. This test was performed two times, once as participants sat still, and the second with participants tapping their finger in a rhythmic fashion.

The lab then used a functional neuroimaging technique called magnetoencephalography, which measures magnetic fields created by naturally occurring electrical currents in the brain, to measure rhythmic neural activities in the participant’s brain.

“[Neuroimaging shows a] passive measurement of brain activity at the scalp level,” Morillon said. “Then, you have like 300 channels regarding electrodes [….] And then [you] try to guess where this activity comes from.”

Their results showed that simply activating the motor complex by tapping a finger sharpened the participants’ perceptions of sound and made it easier for them to correctly identify whether the target melodies veered above or below the  reference beeps.

When the motor cortex triggers motion in a rhythmic fashion, the auditory cortex can better predict when a sound will occur, and hence listen more carefully for it.

When the auditory input is simple, enacting the motor system doesn’t make a difference. It only gets activated when stimuli become more complex and varied.

Morillon noted that at cocktail hour, for example, when a noisy atmosphere makes concentrating on a single conversation challenging, head nodding or foot tapping  has been shown to increase attention to the conversation.

Another interesting time this connection can be observed is in a nightclub. When listening to music, the brain wants to focus on the sound input that it is receiving and decipher it.

When a song is in ‘the sweet spot’ and has a rhythm not too complex, nor too basic, the temporal lobe—the region of the brain used to decypher sound—figures out what it is hearing with help from the motor system.

“The music is grooving when the rhythm is a bit complex but you can still capture it,” Morillon said.

A more practical application of how this research will help people is in language rehabilitation, where the ability to focus on what is being said is crucial to the understanding.

A similar physical-auditory relationship does not occur with other senses, because other senses automatically use the motor system. For instance, when a person looks at something their eyes physically move to view it, when they touch something they move to touch it. When something is heard, it can be hard to control what specifically to pick up on.

In his next study, Morillon hopes to perform similar tests, using actual speech as opposed to beeps in order to gain a better understanding of how this relationship between sound and body occurs naturally in the environment around it.

Science & Technology

Three documentaries on Netflix to get you thinking about oceans

by Jade Prévost-Manuel on

More in Science & Technology:

In an age where human interplanetary travel is nearing feasibility and our species occupies all corners of the earth, our fragile oceans still remain a mystery.

According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), less than five per cent of the oceans have been explored. Documentary filmmakers everywhere have capitalized on the mysteries of the deep—and the not-so-deep—seas, where some of Earth’s most curious creatures are facing serious climatic hurdles.

The abyss of the Netflix catalogue boasts a large selection of marine documentaries; as a tribute to our evasive, albeit threatened, oceans, check out these three great documentaries to get water lovers with curious minds hyped about the deep blue.

 

Oceans (2009)

“The Mantis shrimp keeps a sharp lookout… he doesn’t take kindly to strangers.”—Pierce Brosnan, Oceans

Chock-full of unbelievable footage and filmed in 50 locations around the globe, Oceans is the Planet Earth of the underwater world. It features the incredible diversity of ocean life, ranging from predators like the Great White shark to the elusive Spanish-dancing sea slug.

For queasy viewers, the American version omits the usual horror-inducing predator-prey scenes to cater to all audiences.

Actor Pierce Brosnan performs the running commentary with well-timed wit and light-hearted humour to keep viewers on their toes. Oceans caters to anyone with a general interest in the ocean and the animals that live there.

 

Chasing Coral (2017)

“26 per cent of the Great Barrier Reef corals died in 2016.”—Chasing Corals

Over 25 per cent of all marine life relies on coral reefs. Recent overwhelmingly disheartening news describes how these ecosystems have fared with rising global temperatures.

Chasing Coral, the successor to Chasing Ice, employs time-lapse cameras stationed all over the world to document the global coral bleaching events of the past few years.

Featuring never-before-seen underwater cameras—designed to withstand tropical storms and the ever-changing marine environment—it highlights one of the trendiest mapping projects underway: A 360-degree survey of the world’s coral reefs. Essentially an underwater Google Earth, the XL Catlin SeaView Survey substitutes a pricey vacation with a virtual snorkelling trip.

For those interested in how climate change impacts the ocean, this film offers visual proof of the devastation facing the world’s reefs and the hopes of saving them in astounding resolution.

 

Mission Blue (2014)

“[Jacques-Cousteau’s 1956 film] Silent World made me want to see what he saw: To meet fish swimming in something other than lemon slices and butter on a plate."—Sylvia Earle, Mission Blue

There’s no question that the oceans have changed drastically over the past 60 years. With a career spanning the better part of six decades, Sylvia Earle—marine biologist, conservationist, and ocean advocate—bore witness to these transformations.

This documentary focuses on Earle’s career, as well as the growth of her organization, Mission Blue. Mission Blue aims to create a global network of protected marine environments Earle calls “hope spots.” These protected areas are crucial to the health of the ocean, and identifying them is key in strategizing plans for future marine work. Revitalizing these damaged habitats can promote global stewardship toward the oceans.

As a woman in science, Earle has faced numerous challenges. At a time when academia was dominated by men, she proved her worth as the only woman—in a crew of 70—to work on the International Indian Ocean Expedition in 1964. Later in her career, she was the first woman offered the position of Chief Scientist to the NOAA.

With unrivalled enthusiasm, Earle gives a voice to that which cannot speak for itself. Mission Blue won the News and Documentary Emmy Award for Outstanding Editing in 2015, earning it a spot on any nature-documentary lover’s list.

 

Happy Netflixing!

 
Student Life

Top five places to cry on campus

by Sanchi Bhalla on

More in Student Life:

There are two types of McGill students: Those who admit to crying on campus, and liars. University is hard and stressful, and between the stress of navigating classes, extracurricular activities, and rough nights out, it’s cathartic to have a release a few tears when you need to. Crying on campus is by far the most time-efficient way of letting your emotions loose while also making it to your classes. However, McGill’s campus is huge, and finding the perfect spot to sob—that hasn’t already been taken—can be more stressful than your next midterm. To solve this dilemma, The McGill Tribune has compiled a list of the best places to cry on campus, for any occasion.

Cybertheque’s Premiere Moisson Cafe

Nothing heals a damaged spirit quite like a calorie-fest of bread, sugar, and chocolate. The Premiere Moisson (PM) in Redpath Library’s Cybertheque basement area makes it convenient for the occasions when you want to cry while eating a croissant. With their delectable desserts, fresh breads, and slabs of chocolate, PM is the perfect place to mend a heart broken by anything—from exes to exams. Order a hot chocolate and a slice of cheesecake, and proceed to fill the endless void in your life with carbs.

The steps of the Arts building

When you’re having one of those days—you know, when you’ve locked yourself out of your apartment, spilled hot coffee on yourself, and flunked your test—embrace the melodramatic side of your personality and the ultimate realization that life will always be painful and stomp on over to the Arts building. Maybe go inside first, play the score to Interstellar, and then walk out the main doors. Bonus points if you manage to slam the door on your way out. Throw a loud fit outside on the marble stairs: Tears, screams, the whole nine yards. If you’re lucky enough, a tour group or a throng of confused students might think that your tantrum is really a performance piece. They might even give you a couple dollars if you get really into it.

The SSMU lounge

Have you been pulling too many all-nighters and drinking too much coffee? Has your  ‘sleep-is-for-the-weak’ attitude led you down a dark hole of repeated long nights wasting away in front of your computer screen? Tears of exhaustion are a real, and unfortunately, very common thing to see on any university campus. It’s times like this when you need to get yourself to the SSMU building and cry, nap, then cry some more. Curl up on one of the couches or bean bags and let all that negativity out. If you’ve been too busy to eat, pop over to La Prep and grab a sandwich first. Either way, you can only enjoy SSMU’s luxurious amenities for another few months before its temporary closure—take advantage of it while you can!

The Macdonald Campus shuttle

Having an existential crisis? Don’t know what you’re doing with your life but feel like everyone else has it figured out? Take the shuttle to the Macdonald Campus, which comes in 35 to 45 minute intervals. The ride to and from the Mac Campus is over half an hour each way, and if you listen to sad music while crying and looking out the window, it’s almost like you’re in a music video. I highly recommend introspective songs, such as ‘The Climb’ by Miley Cyrus. Sing and cry at the same time, and at the same volume, and you just might make every other person on the shuttle feel as terrible as you do.

Your professor’s office

If you’re failing a class and have noticed exam season is right around the corner, it’s time to embrace Shakespearean dramatics. Barge into your professor’s office—preferably during office hours—and start bawling. Don’t say a single word; let the tears talk for themselves. Eventually, having a sobbing student in your professor’s office will weigh on their conscience and they’ll try to do everything they can to help, even if it’s just to get you to shut up. Fingers crossed that they remember you when grading and are a little more lenient, remembering your nervous—and awkward—breakdown.

Life at McGill is hard, and things will probably only continue to get worse over the course of your time here. So embrace your pain; go forth and sob. Just remember to make it to your next class on time.

1 … 633 634 635 636 637 … 1,364

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue