Latest News

Sports

The Tribune’s sporting sensations of July 2025

July was an incredible month for all manner of sports fans, delivering jaw-dropping performances and unforgettable moments from the hallowed courts of Wimbledon to the grueling climbs of the Tour de France. Athletes pushed their limits and cemented their places in history across multiple sporting feats. From top spin to top bins, we’ve compiled some of the summer’s biggest and best highlights that had everyone talking.

1. Wimbledon: Świątek’s dominance 

The 2025 Wimbledon Championships saw a truly historic performance from Poland’s Iga Świątek, who delivered a flawless and brutal masterclass in the women’s singles final. Facing off against American Amanda Anisimova, Świątek needed just 57 minutes to secure her first Wimbledon title, winning with an astounding 6-0, 6-0 scoreline (colloquially referred to as a ‘double bagel’). Such a result marks the second time in the Open era that a women’s Grand Slam final ended this way, the first being Martina Navratilova’s victory in the 1983 US Open. This dominant victory is Świątek’s sixth Grand Slam title. Świątek’s performance on what is typically her least successful surface proves that her talent and determination know no bounds, solidifying her status as one of the sport’s all-time greats.

2. Tour de France: Pogačar’s fourth yellow jersey 

The 112th edition of the Tour de France culminated in a familiar sight: Tadej Pogačar on the top step of the podium in Paris, clad in the iconic and painfully elusive yellow jersey. The Slovenian sensation clinched his fourth Tour de France title this summer, adding to his pre-existing victories from 2020, 2021, and 2024. Pogačar’s unwavering performance was a testament to his tactical brilliance and relentless power. He navigated the treacherous mountain stages and time trials to secure a surprisingly comfortable lead against his long-time rival Jonas Vingegaard of Denmark, who challenged Pogačar intensely in prior years. This fourth win firmly places Pogačar among some of the most successful cyclists in the history of the sport, and at just 26 years old, many are already wondering how many more victories he will claim in the coming years. 

3. The Open Championship: Scheffler’s masterclass at Royal Portrush 

The ever-polarising American golf star Scottie Scheffler reaffirmed his position as the world’s number one with a confident victory at the 153rd Open Championship at Royal Portrush, a prestigious, high-calibre course in Northern Ireland. Scheffler, who had already won a major earlier in the year, displayed an eye-catching demonstration of consistent, high-level golf, finishing with a total score of 17-under-par. The all-American top three (including Harris English and Chris Gotterup) were separated only by five strokes in total, but Scheffler’s -17 score was a comfortable four strokes clear of the second place spot on the podium. He dominated. This win marks Scheffler’s first Open Championship title and his fourth major overall. His performance throughout the week was a clinic in control and composure, showcasing why he is currently the most renowned player in the game.

4. World Aquatics Championships: Marvelous McIntosh and Marchand shine 

The 2025 World Aquatics Championships in Singapore were a showcase of the sport’s brightest young stars. Canadian Summer McIntosh was named the women’s “Swimmer of the Meet” after a phenomenal performance that saw her secure four individual gold medals and one bronze. Her championship record-breaking swims in the 200m and 400m individual medleys and the 200m butterfly highlighted her versatility and power. On the men’s side, Frenchman Léon Marchand earned “Swimmer of the Meet,” breaking a long-standing world record in the 200m individual medley and taking home two gold medals.

5. UEFA Women’s Euro 2025: The Lionesses conquer Europe again 

In a stunning display of resilience, the Lionesses of England clinched the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Women’s Euro 2025 title, defeating Spain in a tense penalty shootout. The final, held at St. Jakob-Park in Basel, Switzerland, ended 1-1 after extra time. Spain took an early lead with a goal from Arsenal striker Mariona Caldentey in the 25th minute, but England’s Alessia Russo, also an Arsenal star, equalized the game in the 57th minute, forcing the match into extra time. The game was ultimately decided by penalties, where Chelsea and England goalkeeper Hannah Hampton made two crucial saves for the Lionesses. Yet another Arsenal player, Chloe Kelly, England’s hero of the 2022 Euro final, scored the decisive spot kick to secure a 3-1 victory in the shootout. This win marks the second consecutive European title for the Lionesses, who have cemented their place as one of the most dominant forces in women’s football.

Looking back, it has been an incredible summer for world sports. From a historic “double bagel” at Wimbledon to a fourth Tour de France title, July was especially packed with incredible sporting achievements. These moments of skill and determination will be remembered as we head into what we’re sure will be a fall season to remember across McGill varsity, provincial, and world sports: Stay tuned!

McGill, News

McGill Athletics to face potential challenges with delayed residence move-in dates

Following the McGill administration’s decision to delay the fall 2025 first-year move-in date, students expressed concerns over the new date’s impact on various orientation events. According to members of the McGill University Athletics program, this one-week delay not only affects the social and academic lives of all first-years, but it also specifically puts incoming student athletes at a disadvantage. 

Many McGill sports teams rely on beginning-of-term tryouts to recruit student athletes. While most of these tryouts occur shortly after move-in weekend, some tryouts are scheduled during or even before Aug. 23, the earliest move-in date. Tryouts for the golf team are scheduled on Aug. 20, and the Redbirds rugby team tryouts will take place over the weekend of residence move-in.

Grace Hodges, U3 Arts, plays as a defender on the Martlets field hockey team. In a written statement to The Tribune, she explained how McGill’s changes to residence move-in dates have already affected the team’s tryout process.

“Joining McGill Field Hockey involves a two-week preseason before three days of tryouts,” Hodges wrote. “Instead of our customary two weeks of preseason, [this year] we have one optional week for returning players and rookies that can move in early and then a week of official preseason. Not only does this impact crucial training hours for an incredibly compact season, but it makes it more difficult for rookies and returners to get to know each other, integrate into the team culture, and develop a cohesive playing style in a timely manner.”

Allan Swetman, head coach of the Martlets rugby team, wrote to The Tribune that it is not unusual for pre-season activities to start prior to official residence move-in dates.

“This has been the case in previous years when the season timeline required it,” Swetman wrote. “When needed, our team has historically assisted with the arrangement of billeting with returning student-athletes to ensure that first-year recruits can participate fully in pre-season activities. This practice has been in place for some time and continues to serve as a workable solution within the constraints of the broader academic calendar.”

While the scheduling changes may take a toll on team sports, individual sports are less likely to be affected, as Dennis Barrett, head coach of the cross country team, explained to The Tribune.

“[The new residence move-in date] will not affect our cross country program, as the returning and new athletes will begin preparing for the season on their own or with a club coach depending on where they are from,” wrote Barrett.

In a written statement to The Tribune, McGill Athletics’s Senior Communications and Marketing Manager Stephanie Malley explained the Athletic program’s efforts to support incoming first-year student athletes in the face of administrative changes.

“When scheduling [tryouts], teams do their best to take into consideration the overall McGill calendar for students to ensure ease of attendance for those who are interested in participating,” she wrote. 

Hodges commented on how, despite McGill’s efforts, the decision to delay first-year residence move-in dates may still affect the university’s athletic competency in the long term.

“The most significant impact on competitiveness would be for tier 2 teams with smaller squads, like field hockey, that rely on rookies to help run an effective season,” she wrote. “In the long run, competitive success is tied to many things like effective coaching, support, skill, and team morale.” 

Hodges further emphasized the need for McGill Athletics teams to provide time for new players to adjust to their new environments.

“The ability for a team to perform as a unit is critical to starting a season on the right foot,” Hodges wrote.

Although preseason activities and tryouts do not always align with McGill students’ calendar, Swetman highlighted that providing student-athletes with the support they need will remain a priority.

“As always, our goal is to ensure that all student-athletes are supported in beginning their season on the right foot, and we will continue to manage pre-season logistics accordingly,” Swetman said.


For more information on open tryout dates for various sports teams, visit the McGill Athletics website.

Commentary, Opinion

Bill 97 bulldozes Indigenous livelihoods

Quebec’s government is moving toward securing unbarred executive control over 8 million hectares of the province’s forests for the forestry industry’s industrial logging agenda. This legislation—Bill 97—pads the pockets of industrial logging companies, while bulldozing constitutional and humanitarian obligations to the Indigenous communities who steward much of the targeted land.  

Bill 97 proposes splitting Quebec’s forests into a “triad” of zones: Conservation zones, which are protected from logging; multi-purpose zones, which incorporate both development and conservation; and ‘priority forest development zones.’ The third category gives the forest industry complete executive control of 30 per cent of Quebec’s forests, regardless of environmental damage or intrusion on Indigenous communities and cultural practices

The bill was tabled on April 23 by Quebec’s Minister of Natural Resources and Forests Maïté Blanchette Vézina, but faces continued protest from Indigenous leaders for excluding Indigenous voices in the drafting process and for neglecting Indigenous rights. 

Almost half the land allotted as a ‘development zone’ in Bill 97 is unceded Indigenous territory.  Indigenous groups on unceded territory are granted right of Aboriginal Title and inherent rights to self-governance under the 1982 Constitution Act, as well as internationally-recognized protections under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). By appropriating this land, Bill 97 violates Canada’s most fundamental Indigenous land rights.

Given these constitutional and international guarantees, non-Indigenous entities such as governments or corporations must obtain approval before occupying or using unceded land over which Indigenous peoples have governing authority. Bill 97 unlawfully bypassed this obligation to acquire Indigenous consent by excluding Indigenous leaders in the drafting of the bill, and allotting unchecked power to industrial forestry projects in the designated ‘priority development’ zones. In these areas, opposition parties and environmental guidelines hold no legal authority to restrict intense logging activities—dismantling the rules of ecosystem management that previously governed activities in all of Quebec’s forests.

After the bill was tabled, representatives from the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador (AFNQL) sent a formal letter of rejection to Vézina, emphasizing that Indigenous priorities had been not simply ignored, but explicitly undermined in the final version of the bill. AFNQL Chief Francis Verreault-Paul added that Indigenous futures are “inextricably linked” to the territories this bill seeks to exploit, and that Bill 97 ignores Indigenous expertise while projecting irreversible damage to those territories.

Not only do the contents of Bill 97 allocate enormous portions of unceded Indigenous land to industrial deforestation, but its proposed commitment to consult and collaborate with Indigenous communities extends almost no substantial decision-making power to Indigenous leaders. Bill 97 promises to include an “Indigenous community consultation policy” regarding the extent and limits of land use, but this policy is to be drafted by the Minister of Natural Resources and Forests—not by Indigenous communities. Its stated aim may be “harmonizing” Indigenous activities with forest development plans, but harmony is an empty promise when only one party is allowed to sing its part. 

Such blatant disregard for Indigenous authority, natural ecosystems, cultural specificity, and constitutional rights is criminal on its own, but when that disregard is coming directly from the government, it is truly unconscionable. Dozens of Indigenous groups have made it clear that Bill 97 is a threat to their most fundamental rights and to the basic sanctity of their homes. But instead of addressing these pleas with discussion, compromise, or—ideally—priority, the Quebec government has turned its back on Indigenous communities, choosing only to face them armed with tractors, saws, and bulldozers.


Vézina has paused discussion of the bill for the summer, while promising to make “significant amendments in collaboration with First Nations.” Though Vézina has agreed to informal discussion with AFNQL leaders, she has still not given them any formal role in the decision process. If Bill 97 gets passed, it will impoverish democracy in Quebec and stand as another instance in a long line of systematic environmental racism, marginalization, and disregard directed towards Indigenous communities.

Student Life

Four eco-friendly practices for Montreal apartment living

(Ruby Reimer / The Tribune)

As summer winds down and a new academic year approaches, many students are moving into—or back into—their Montreal apartments for the fall semester. Whether you’re settling into your first off-campus space or returning to a familiar rental, it’s the perfect time to establish habits that are good for the planet and your wallet. Luckily, making more sustainable choices doesn’t have to mean overhauling your life or spending a fortune; some of the best eco-friendly changes are also the simplest.

At The Tribune, we’ve rounded up four small swaps you can make to live smarter, greener, and more intentionally this school year.

Ditch paper towels for dish cloths

Paper towels may be convenient, but their environmental impact adds up fast. A 2012 study from MIT found that two paper towel rolls produce 15 grams of CO2 emissions. With daily use in the kitchen, bathroom, and beyond, these seemingly insignificant emissions  have a substantial environmental impact. Instead, switch to reusable dish cloths or rags, which can be washed hundreds of times. This simple swap cuts back on landfill waste and the emissions associated with manufacturing and transporting single-use products. 

Master the secondhand marketplace 

Moving into your apartment often means stocking up on furniture, kitchenware, and home decor. But before you make a beeline to IKEA, consider buying secondhand. After all, the purchase of pre-owned pieces keeps usable items out of landfills. Montreal is a goldmine for pre-loved home essentials. From the thriving thrift store scene to vintage shops and community-driven platforms, there are plenty of options to furnish your space without generating more waste. Local thrift shops like Renaissance offer not just clothing, but also dishes, lamps, small appliances, and quirky decor pieces that add character to your space. Éco Dépôt is another fantastic option for sourcing vintage furniture. Lastly, Facebook Marketplace can become your go-to for affordable, local finds. Make sure to search for your desired pieces in both English and French to double your chances of finding what you need—try swapping “coffee table” for “table basse,” or “dresser” for “commode.”

Clean green

Commercial cleaning products end up polluting the environment when they evaporate or travel through drains. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), cleaning products contain certain chemicals such as alkylphenol ethoxylates that may be detrimental to aquatic habitats. One way to reduce the release of pollutants is to make your cleaning products at home. You can complete most cleaning tasks around your apartment with a combination of three ingredients you probably already have: Water, white vinegar, and lemon juice. Mix them in equal parts, then pour the mixture into a reusable spray bottle for a versatile all-purpose cleaner. This simple solution can tackle almost every surface in your apartment—from the stove top to the bathroom tiles—without harming the planet.

Air it out

In the average Canadian household, appliances account for 13.6 per cent of total energy use. According to the non-profit Green America, households that opt to air-dry clothes can reduce their carbon footprint by 2,400 pounds a year. Air-drying doesn’t just benefit the planet: The high heat and tumbling of dryers can weaken fabrics, cause shrinkage, and fade colours over time. When you hang your clothes to dry, they last longer, allowing you to replace them less often. Sure, Montreal winters and rainy days aren’t always conducive to outdoor drying, but that doesn’t mean you need to rely on your dryer year-round. A collapsible drying rack can hold an entire load of laundry without taking up space in your apartment between washes. Plus, in dry winter months, indoor air-drying can even add a bit of humidity back into your home.

Behind the Bench, Sports

The blurry lines between poor sportsmanship and racism in women’s professional tennis

On June 7, American tennis star Coco Gauff fell to the ground in pure emotion upon winning the 2025 Roland-Garros (French Open) final. The 21-year-old shone in the match’s second and third sets to beat renowned Belarusian player Aryna Sabalenka, currently ranked number one in the world by the Women’s Tennis Association, 6-7 (5), 6-2, 6-4. Gauff’s victory makes her the first American singles champion at the French Open since Serena Williams, who took home the trophy a decade prior.

After Gauff’s wonderful Roland-Garros performance, she immediately acknowledged Sabalenka’s strength as a player, and congratulated Sabalenka and her team, in her post-match speech. However, Sabalenka did not extend the same courtesy to her competitor, choosing to blame her definitive loss on the day’s windy conditions. Sabalenka also claimed in a post-tournament press conference that her 70 unforced errors throughout the game’s three sets meant she was able to “give those wins” to Gauff.

“It felt like a joke honestly, like someone from above was just staying there laughing and like, ‘Let’s see if you can handle this’ […] and I couldn’t today,” Sabalenka proclaimed, crying. “I think [Gauff] won the match not because she played incredible, just because I made all of those mistakes [….] She simply was better in these conditions than me.”

Sabalenka continued by speculating that, if she had not beat the 2022, 2023, and 2024 French Open champion Iga Świątek in the 2025 semifinal match, Świątek would have taken the title from Gauff in this year’s Roland-Garros final.

Rightly, viewers around the world criticized Sabalenka for being a sore loser. But for Sabalenka to frame the French Open final as her—and even Świątek’s—losses, rather than as Gauff’s win, goes beyond poor manners: It reflects a persistent desire in tennis to minimize and villainize Black women’s accomplishments. Black women’s tennis successes are frequently framed as a result of their ability to “intimidate” their opponents with their “extreme physicality,” or as the result of luck. Rather than admire or acknowledge the pure skill and determination Black women—just like all other professional athletes—bring to elite tennis, white players and the media reduce them to racist caricatures, commenting on their Blackness above all. And when Black women lose, their frustrations are demonized, while white runners-up go uncriticized for their tears and outbursts. Whether Black women in tennis are winning or losing, professional tennis culture clearly treats their excellence as on the line every time these athletes step on the court.

Unfortunately, this year’s French Open is not the only instance of Sabalenka making underhanded remarks towards Gauff’s success. When Gauff defeated Sabalenka2-6, 6-3, 6-2—in the 2023 US Open final, Sabalenka attributed her loss to “overthinking” in the presence of a roaring American crowd who were eager to see Gauff take the win on home soil. In a press conference following the match, Sabalenka stated, “The good news is that it’s me against me. The bad [news] is that I’m still having these issues playing against myself [….] But it’s okay. I’ll work harder so next time, I’m not going to get even a little bit tired on court, and so I’ll be better.”

Sabalenka treating Gauff’s wins as dependent on her own focus and energy levels is clearly a pattern of attempting to undermine Gauff’s tactical, exciting, and world champion-worthy playing style. By repeatedly centering the outcome of a match on her personal abilities, Sabalenka has tried to erase Gauff’s success from the scoreboard, time and again.

When white opponents undermine Black winners in this way, they enable and condone racist tennis coverage that aims to further dehumanize Black women in the sport. Black women in tennis are frequently painted as inhumanely strong: In a 2013 Rolling Stone profile piece, a white journalist described Serena Williams as “‘built like one of those monster trucks that crushes Volkswagens at sports arenas.’” In 2014, the President of the Russian Tennis Federation, Shamil Tarpischev, called Williams and her sister Venus the “‘Williams brothers,’’ perpetuating the masculinization of Black women to devalue the sisters’ Grand Slam dominance of the time. And when not likening Black women to men, the media attempts to whitewash them, with one of player Naomi Osaka’s own sponsors depicting her with lighter skin in a 2019 advertisement. Women’s tennis coverage therefore either amplifies or conceals its athletes’ Blackness, treating them as exceptional for the completely wrong reasons.

In response to Sabalenka’s remarks that Świątek could have taken the French Open win, Gauff stated to the same press contingent, “I don’t agree with that [….] Last time I played, no shade to Iga or anything, but I played her and I won in straight sets. So, yeah, I don’t think that’s a fair thing to say [….] The way Aryna was playing the last few weeks, she was the favorite to win. So I think she was the best person I could have played in the final, her being number one in the world. So I think I got the hardest matchup.” 

Gauff could have gotten more specific and pointed out that she, in fact, crushed Świątek—6-1, 6-1 in 64 minutes—in May’s Madrid Open. Gauff also could have declined the private and public apologies Sabalenka offered her after receiving widespread internet criticism for her conduct. But Gauff rose above, openly forgiving Sabalenka and repeatedly praising her tennis. The two athletes even made a lighthearted TikTok video together at Wimbledon on June 27. 

“I’m gonna give [Sabalenka] the benefit of the doubt,” Gauff stated on Good Morning America, in one of many interviews where she was asked to respond to Sabalenka’s comments. “I’m sure it was just an emotional day, emotional match [for her].”

Gauff’s grace and class in response to Sabalenka are commendable. But it is disappointing that a major focus of Gauff’s post-win press has been Sabalenka’s actions, rather than Gauff’s successes. The onus has been placed on Gauff to handle Sabalenka’s outburst, and thus to justify and defend her own win. This skewed coverage diverts from public admiration of Gauff’s status as the highest-paid women athlete globally of 2024, or of her now-two Grand Slam titles, all earned by the age of 21. Rather than celebrate Gauff’s stardom, the press has tainted coverage of Gauff’s Roland-Garros win by instead giving attention to a player on her way to the unwanted list.

The professional tennis community and media circuit must start recognizing and celebrating Black women unconditionally, instead of doubting these athletes and trying to efface Black winners from their own wins. Gauff herself touched on doubt in her post-Open speech, referencing the Tyler, The Creator lyric, “I ain’t never had a doubt inside me, / and if I ever told you that I did I’m f*cking lying.” While she was referring to her own anxieties coming into Roland-Garros, Gauff’s words against doubt must be taken by the wider sports community as a call to challenge their racist invalidations of Black women on the court. Questioning Black excellence in women’s professional tennis constitutes a major lie: One which Gauff’s amazing style of play will continue to prove false in the years of her career to come.

(Antoine Larocque / The Tribune)
Research Briefs, Science & Technology

Back to the roots: Investigating how soil influences root traits

Plant roots may be out of sight, but they are not out of mind for McGill researchers. While it is known that fine roots—those less than two mm in diametre—possess highly variable physiological and morphological properties, the reasons behind this variation remain unknown. 

Caroline Dallstream, a PhD student in McGill’s Department of Biology, hypothesized that the heterogeneous nature of soil was a key driver of fine-root trait variation at small spatial scales. To test this, Dallstream and her collaborators investigated the potential drivers of fine root variation of the Handroanthus ochraceus tree across spatial scales—from individual roots to entire forest sites more than 10 km apart from one another in Costa Rica’s dry tropical forests.

Dallstream measured a number of soil variables, including magnesium, ammonium, and nitrate levels. She compared these against different fine root traits, such as the roots’ overall morphology, nitrogen concentration, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization—symbiotic fungi that enhance nutrient uptake—and phosphatase activity—an enzyme that removes phosphate groups from molecules.

Although the research focused on a single tree species, Dallstream and her collaborators collected a wide range of root trait data from the same sample. This approach allowed them to find correlations between several different traits simultaneously: A key strength of the study. Dallstream also noted that later research could apply their experimental approach to other species, which could allow scientists to generalize the findings to better understand how soil influences fine roots.

When discussing their findings, she explained how fine root traits interact in complex ways across different scales.

“[The studied] fine root traits tend to coordinate and trade off in complex ways, and these trade-offs arise across many scales,” Dallstream said in an interview with The Tribune. “But we saw that within [Handroanthus ochraceus], […] the two dominant finite trait coordinations and trade-offs were both driven by soil, but at different spatial scales.”  

In other words, different soil properties influenced different root traits.

“Fine root respiration and morphology were being driven by soil nitrogen, and fine root arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and enzyme activity for organic phosphorus were being driven by soil magnesium and bulk density,” Dallstream explained.

The former data points varied at the individual root level, as soil nitrogen was highly variable within sampling sites. In contrast, AMF colonization and phosphatase activity varied across a larger spatial scale, reflecting large-scale heterogeneity in soil magnesium and bulk density among sites.

Dallstream was surprised to find a correlation between root phosphatase activity and AMF colonization.

“It is possible that the [AMFs] are producing that enzyme, which means that they could be contributing to plant nutrient uptake even more substantially than we already think that they are, because the prevailing idea is that they mostly just absorb [nutrients that are] already available, rather than breaking down more complex compounds for plant uptake,” Dallstream said.

These findings may help scientists find a new perspective on how plants and their roots interact with soil nutrients.

Since magnesium seemed to influence AMF colonization, Dallstream suggested that future studies on plant-soil interactions focus on a wider array of essential plant nutrients. Currently, most studies concentrate on nitrogen and phosphorus, which are thought to be the most limiting nutrients in temperate and tropical areas, respectively.

Dallstream was intrigued by the positive correlation she found between soil magnesium content and AMF colonization; this discovery has since inspired her ongoing work.

“I am currently doing a greenhouse experiment with some tropical tree species to look at how magnesium influences [AMF] colonization and testing a few of the potential mechanisms that could be underlying it,” Dallstream elaborated.

One mechanism she hypothesizes could explain this relationship is that magnesium—a key component of chlorophyll that activates carbon fixation in plants—may increase photosynthesis, allowing plants to send extra carbon to their AMFs to help them acquire even more nutrients.

For Dallstream, the motivation for this research goes beyond academic curiosity.

“I think this research is important because plants literally underlie all life on Earth, and despite that, we still know very little about their basic biology,” Dallstream said.

Looking at the bigger picture, Dallstream’s findings help to better understand ecology in the tropics, addressing a gap in plant literature. Further, they inform how plants coordinate their nutrient acquisition, which usually consists of the fundamental limitation of plant growth, and, therefore, carbon sequestration. These findings could thus allow scientists to improve ecosystem models used to predict ecosystems’ response to climate change.

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

The Bear is back and breaking cycles, not plates

I worked as a server in high school, and I can attest to the chaos that takes place within a restaurant kitchen. Notorious melting pots of large personalities, kitchens are often home to screaming matches and shattered plates. This conflict remains hidden from customers, tucked away behind the facade of crisp napkins and classy service.

However, we don’t always crave this polished front. Sometimes, we prefer to experience reality, no matter how harsh, rather than accept the illusion of perfection. Consider the popularity of celebrity chefs, from Anthony Bourdain to Guy Fieri, Julia Child to Gordon Ramsay. We want the drama, the yelling. Let us smell the cigarette smoke, feel the hot oil splash onto our hands. We want a peek behind the curtain.

Hulu’s smash hit The Bear has been lauded as a painfully accurate depiction of restaurant culture. It tells the story of Carmen “Carmy” Berzatto (Jeremy Allen White), a world-class chef who returns to Chicago to take over his brother’s restaurant after his passing. In the first season, Carmy struggles to find his place among a mismatched cast of employees, but gradually gains their respect when he starts to appreciate each chef’s individuality rather than expecting them to conform. 2023 brought with it the show’s second season, in which Carmy and Sydney (Ayo Edibiri) transform the chaotic Italian sandwich shop into the show’s eponymous fine-dining restaurant. Season three further develops the tensions of trying to succeed in the restaurant business. 

The latest season, which premiered on June 25, raises the stakes: The restaurant has two months to start bringing in a profit and make it out of the red, or else The Bear will be forced to close its doors—forever.

Circles are a key motif in this season. Scallops. Kitchen timers. Plates, bowls. Cycles—whether they be of abuse or forgiveness, progress or hurt. Carmy struggles with repetition as his daily life begins to feel cyclical. In an early scene, he wakes to the muted dialogue of Groundhog Day playing on the television: “What would you do, if you were stuck in one place?” Like the film’s protagonist, Carmy is trapped—he’s entangled in a web of anger and grief, stuck between the pain he has endured and the harm he continues to inflict on those around him. As the episodes progress, however, it becomes clear that Carmy isn’t content with tracing the same circles. He learns to apologize, to atone, to take a deep breath rather than lashing out. It’s satisfying to witness; after hurting everyone around him, Carmy is well overdue for some good old-fashioned grovelling. 

Jeremy Allen White’s performance as Carmy is multifaceted and moving. However, the true standout actor of this season is Ayo Edibiri (also known for her roles in Gen Z cult classics Bottoms and Theatre Camp). Witnessing Edibiri’s rise to fame feels like watching a childhood friend become a celebrity; when she acts, she evokes an immediate sense of closeness, of personal connection. Every time she comes on screen, I feel the need to whisper “I know her” to whoever is beside me. As Sydney, Edibiri is unfailingly authentic, whether stumbling through conversations with near strangers at a wedding or trying to bond with her cousin’s 11-year-old daughter. In one heart-wrenching scene, Edibiri depicts the stuttering sobs of a long-overdue breakdown with stunning accuracy, proving her place in today’s top class of young actors.

Upon the release of its third season, viewers were dismayed to see that The Bear appeared to be caught in the cycle of once-great television shows that decline in quality over time. It struggled to keep up with the frantic page established in previous seasons, choosing to highlight long montages and artistic shots over plot or character development. Thankfully, like Carmy, The Bear is breaking free from its cycle. 

While the fourth season doesn’t return to the quick tempo of the first two seasons, it also strays from the aimless self-indulgence of the third, instead finding a sweet spot between the two extremes. Now, complex framing and artfully selected needle drops are paired with plot progression and emotional growth. Standout scenes are both beautiful and narratively compelling. Sydney cooks bathed in a rich violet in the third episode’s dream-like intro, inventing a key dish under the layered falsetto of St. Vincent’s “Slow Disco.” Lit in deep blue, Camy and Richie sit in Wes Anderson-esque symmetry as tensions simmer.

The Bear isn’t the same heart-pounding, stress-inducing show it once was. Over four seasons, it has transformed into something slower, taking its time and allowing its viewers to grow along with its characters. Ask me a year ago and I might have hesitated, but after watching the newest season, I believe The Bear is one of the best shows currently streaming. While I love eating popcorn on the couch while Carmy and Sydney bicker amid shots of mouth-watering meals, I don’t want to step foot in a restaurant kitchen again for a long time.

Creative, News

Students protest for Palestine at Parliament, in photos 

~DIGITAL~

Thousands of protestors from across Canada gathered for a rally on Parliament Hill in support of Palestinian liberation on April 12. The central message of the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), one of the organizers of the rally, was that “Canada must end its complicity [in the genocide] by demanding a ceasefire, the lift of the siege on Gaza, the flow of humanitarian aid and imposing a full two-way arms embargo.”
Protestors demand an arms embargo. A March 26 report released by Project Ploughshares revealed that the Canadian government had broken its commitment to suspend arms exports and indirect transfers through the US to Israel. 
Protestors denounce the killing of Palestinian journalists in Gaza. As of May 26, 2025, Israeli forces have killed 180 journalists and media workers since the Oct. 7 attacks, according to a report by The Committee to Protect Journalists.
In a social media post published on the day of the rally and march, PYM estimated the event’s attendance to surpass 30,000 people.
Protestors stand in front of Indigo Books & Music Inc., a Canadian business whose head executives, Heather Reisman and Gerry Schwartz, founded the HESEG foundation. The foundation provides scholarships and grants for individuals who move to Israel and join the Israeil Defence Forces. After the rally, thousands marched through the streets of Ottawa calling for boycotts of businesses affiliated with the state of Israel. 

~FILM~

Student organizations from multiple Canadian universities rallied on April 12. Students from Montreal, Québec City, Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton and other cities in Canada gathered at the nation’s capital to support the cause.
The rally took place 3 days after McGill’s Interim Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning), Angela Campbell, announced the university’s intent to terminate its Memorandum of Agreement with the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), condemning the SSMU’s strike for Palestine
Protestors demand an end to Israel’s renewed blockade of Gaza, which has been in place since early March. As of May 20, 2025, 930,000 children are at risk of famine according to a UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) assessment.
Students from the University of Ottawa call for the university to divest from companies complicit in Israeli military offences. Together, McGill University and the University of Ottawa have invested millions in weapons manufacturing companies, such as Airbus SE, that contribute to the Palestinian genocide.     
This past semester, student unions from Canadian universities such as the University of British Columbia and McGill University have voted to go on strike in solidarity with Palestine.

Art, Arts & Entertainment

Faith in art over profit with ‘Berthe Weill: Art Dealer of the Parisian Avant-Garde’

In a corner of the exhibition’s second room, Émilie Charmy’s Still Life with Pomegranates sits beside Jacqueline Marval’s self-portrait Minerva. The scenes in oil are classical: Persephone, the daughter of Demeter, condemned to the underworld for six months for eating six pomegranate seeds, resurfacing in the spring only to descend six months later back into hell, becomes stained in rich red on Charmy’s canvas, where six open pomegranates spill onto a white platter. Marval’s Minerva stands in the woods holding a spear; the artist’s name emblazoned in large red letters across the bottom of her breastplate. Marval trained as a seamstress and signed her name on her image’s clothing as if embroidered onto the armour’s scales. The scenes are reimaginings, but ones that are true to the myths they spring from—women painting themselves into the past, not to insert themselves into history, but to tell the stories where they’ve existed all along.

We don’t know if Minerva hung in Berthe Weill’s gallery—documentation surrounding the painting is limited and scholarly work to unearth Weill’s life is ongoing. She was, routinely and repeatedly, by both historians and her contemporaries, written out of the story of the Parisian Avant-Garde and modern art as a whole.

Weill, a lifelong Parisian, grew up in an Alsatian Jewish family. Though she was raised without money and often struggled to stay afloat throughout her career, she displayed a categorical indifference to profit. She believed in her artists and the art they produced, did not charge them to exhibit their work (as her contemporaries did), and refused to exhibit art for its monetary value.

As Weill writes in her memoir, Pow! Right in the Eye!, “I would rather eat bricks.”

Berthe Weill, Art Dealer of the Parisian Avant-Garde is a joint force between Montreal, New York, and Paris, curated by Anne Grace, Curator of Modern Art at the MMFA; Marianne Le Morvan, founder of the Berthe Weill Archives; Lynn Gumpert, former Director of the Grey Art Museum at New York University; and Sophie Eloy, Attaché to the Collection at the Musée de l’Orangerie.

“We were able to draw attention to artists that certain museums have in their collection that they were not even very conscious of,” Anne Grace said in an interview with The Tribune.

The exhibition—centered around an art dealer as opposed to an artist—produces a polyvocal picture of Belle-Époque Paris: The story of artists who came and went, works Weill sold, and those she championed against the grain. 

The resulting recreation compresses time and extrapolates space. Forty years spanning the first half of the 20th century in a small Montmartre space are transformed into a major exhibition spread across several rooms in Montreal. Modigliani, Picasso, Cézanne, and Chagall are displayed amongst invitations to costume balls at the gallery, bulletins, and courtroom sketches. Weill’s spectacles lie lens-less and unlabelled in a glass case beside an ink portrait of the dealer by Édouard Goerg.

Weill did not train in an art gallery, but in an antique shop. It belonged to her cousin, Salvatore Mayer, and upon his death, Weill opened her own antique shop alongside her brother. The shop transformed into a gallery of her own, carefully named so as not to reveal the dealer’s gender. Galerie B. Weill opened in 1901.

She lined her gallery with paintings, but also prints, pendants, pottery, sculptures, and jewelry. 

“She, in general, had this openness and complete disregard for hierarchies [….]  She probably finished school around the age of 10, when public education for girls stopped. So she wouldn’t have necessarily had this ingrained notion of hierarchies in medium or subject matter,” Grace said.

When Weill met Amedeo Modigliani, he was drunk in her gallery; two years later, in 1917, she became the first—and only—dealer to organize a solo exhibition of Modigliani’s works during his lifetime. The exhibition was later shut down by order of the police commissioner. The nudes had pubic hair. This overwhelmed many viewers. The commissioner took Weill into the local precinct for questioning: “Those disgust-” he exclaimed to Weill. “They…they… h-h-h-have hair!” No works were sold, save for those that Weill purchased for herself.

Weill wanted to exhibit young artists, the unknown names—a group she affectionately referred to as “les Jeunes”—and championed émigré artists in Paris. The vibrant world of 20th century art is spread out across the exhibition. In the first room, there’s The Wretched, a mass of intertwined bodies in bronze by Meta Vaux Warrick Fuller—an African-American sculptor who would train with Rodin in Paris before returning to the U.S. to sculpt the Harlem Renaissance. There’s The Bird Cage by Marc Chagall, a Jewish Russian-French modernist, featuring an anthropomorphic rooster-man in purple pants playing a fiddle. There’s Marie Laurencin’s Woman Holding Flowers, a gossamer scene in oil (the label recounts the story of Laurencin, a queer cubist painter, bursting into Weill’s gallery and declaring, “I want to meet a lesbian!”).

Suzanne Valadon’s Nude with a Striped Blanket, or Gilberte in the Nude Seated on a Bed shows her niece, nude, sitting with her legs swung onto the floor at the foot of her bed. She’s slightly slouched. Her form is not contorted for show: Not spread, not bent, not splayed. I recognize her body’s configuration—how she stretches her legs, how she leans, how she reads, the creases and folds on her stomach—it’s how I sit.

Valadon painted women who exist as they are, without a voyeur. It’s a nude form that doesn’t exist to produce desire.

The movements that Weill championed—Fauvism, Cubism—are those that took reality and refused to canalize it into something empiric or straightforward. They mirror the approach that Weill herself took in her indifference to profit: She desired something beautiful and intangible that focused on the heart of the art itself, as opposed to trying to turn it into something material and marketable. In her lack of education, lack of money, lack of opportunities, Weill reached inward to find what art moved her, and in looking outwards, advocated for art that subverted the language of production that she herself had never desired to speak. 

A vision of the body that doesn’t exist to yield desire. Art that doesn’t exist to yield money. 

In 1940, the Nazis invaded Paris. Le Cahier jaune—an antisemitic French periodical—published a virulent attack on Weill, writing that she was greedy, caring only for money and not for art. Weill went into hiding, transferring her gallery to a non-Jewish friend in an attempt to save it. A year later, Galerie B. Weill closed forever.

Weill survived the war. Details of her life under occupation are obscure, made more difficult to pin down because Weill had to make herself hard to find in order to have a chance at survival. Two of her artists, Otto Freundlich and Sophie Blum-Lazarus, died in concentration camps. 

Photographs of Weill from any period are hard to come by. Portraits of her are limited, and those that exist and survive, namely Émilie Charmy’s Portrait of Berthe Weill, show her standing upright, unsmiling, her five-foot frame swallowed by a large black coat buttoned up to the neck, her left sleeve rolled up to reveal a wristwatch.

“She really focused her attention on the artists themselves, and not herself. So the self effacing aspect, I think, is revealed in both her physical appearance, the way she dressed and the lack of portraits, whether they be painted or photographic portraits,” said Grace.

Contrary to the lack of images of Weill, she is thought to be the first art dealer to write and publish her memoirs during her lifetime (she beat out the publication of her rival dealer Ambroise Vollard’s autobiography by a year).

Berthe Weill died in 1951. She was blind. Weill—who had never married, and used her dowry to fund the gallery in its early days—was left destitute in the wake of the war. In her last years, as her health declined, the artists Weill had championed early in their careers, when no one else would, organized an art auction to raise money for her care. Chagall, Picasso, Metzinger, and other prominent artists and gallerists raised 1.5 million francs for the woman they called Mère Weill—a homophone with “merveille,” “wonder” in French—and supported her until the end of her life, as she had once supported them.

Berthe Weill: Art Dealer of the Parisian Avant-Garde will run until Sept. 7, 2025. Tickets are available online or in-person at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts. 
Weill’s memoir Pow! Right in the Eye! Thirty Years behind the Scenes of Modern French Painting is available in print and as an ebook through the McGill Library.

McGill, News

SPHR commemorates student movement victories, including PAGIP’s ratification, one year after Palestine Solidarity Encampment

On May 4, Students for Palestine’s Honour and Resistance (SPHR) at McGill hosted a community gathering and fundraiser for Gaza on McGill’s Lower Field. These eight hours of programming marked the anniversary of the Palestinian Solidarity Encampment, established by student protestors on the Lower Field one year prior. 

In an interview with The Tribune, a representative of SPHR at McGill who wished to remain unnamed explained how the gathering reaffirmed the encampment’s project of solidarity with the broader global movement for Palestine.

“We’re seeing students again gather on Lower Field […] to bring the [city-wide] community, and the student base, together again,” they said. “To again take up space on our campus, reclaim our campus, but also engage in these cultural and political activities that should be making up our education.”

A Concordia student attending the gathering who wished to remain anonymous echoed the impact the encampment had beyond McGill’s campus.

“Concordia students have their own demands towards Concordia,” the student said in an interview with The Tribune. “Many actions have been at Concordia, and it’s actually thanks to the encampment. The encampment really sparked that student protest.”

Along with creating solidarity across different pro-Palestine activist groups, the encampment strove to push McGill to disclose and divest from all companies complicit in the genocide in Palestine, to drop disciplinary charges against student protestors for Palestine, and to publicly denounce the genocide. The encampment stood for 75 days, despite facing repeated legal contestation, before McGill-employed private security and police forces ultimately dismantled it on July 10, 2024. 

The SPHR fundraiser marking the encampment’s anniversary began with an art build, during which attendees helped paint a banner for an upcoming Palestinian Youth Movement Montreal demonstration. The day’s programming, designed similarly to educational events held during the encampment, also included letter writing to Palestinians killed in the genocide, a film screening of The Time That Remains, and a tatreez—Palestinian embroidery—circle. 

The SPHR representative told The Tribune how the gathering also intended to commemorate the ongoing fight for Palestine that the encampment has inspired, citing recent Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) victories—such as its strike for Palestine and its ratification of the Policy Against Genocide in Palestine (PAGIP)—as examples of its effect.

“Of course, it’s hard to celebrate anything when there’s an ongoing genocide, but it’s incredible to see how much our movement has been able to achieve,” the SPHR representative said. “We’ve been really able to show since the encampment how steadfast the students have been.”

The PAGIP was approved by 78.7 per cent of non-abstaining student voters well before the encampment’s inception, in the SSMU Fall 2023 Referendum. Once ratified, the PAGIP would require SSMU to lobby McGill to denounce Israel’s siege on Gaza, divest from companies complicit in the genocide, and cut academic ties with Israeli universities. 

However, the Policy was suspended via injunction on Nov. 21, 2023, as an anonymous student plaintiff, with the support of B’nai Brith Canada, argued to the Superior Court of Quebec that PAGIP posed a threat to Jewish students on campus. On May 22, 2024, the Superior Court again granted a demand for an injunction against PAGIP’s ratification. SSMU’s legal team has sought to appeal the injunction since.

On April 17, the Court of Appeal of Quebec unanimously overturned the injunction against PAGIP, noting that it is not the role of courts to resolve political debates within a student association. SSMU officially ratified PAGIP on April 22 through May 1, 2028. 

In a press conference outside the University Centre on April 25, SSMU Vice-President External Hugo-Victor Solomon alleged that McGill committed a “sustained campaign of repression” against student organizers for Palestine leading up to the Court of Appeal’s decision.

“Nearly 80 per cent of 8,000 student voters supported this policy,” Solomon reported during the conference. “That’s not fringe. That’s not exceptional. That’s not controversial. That is the outcome of democracy [….] This victory belongs to every student, Jewish, Palestinian, Muslim, Arab, and allied, who stood firm in the face of repression, [and] who refused to let silence be the price of their education.”

Solomon also directly affirmed SSMU’s commitment to upholding their obligations under PAGIP.

“On behalf of the 25,000 members of the SSMU, and pursuant to Section 2.4 of the Policy, I unequivocally condemn the ongoing genocide, war crimes, and human rights violations endured by the steadfast people of Gaza,” Solomon stated. “We affirm, once and for all, that the Students’ Society of McGill University stands in unambiguous solidarity with our Palestinian and Arab peers.”

At the fundraiser, the SPHR representative commented on PAGIP’s historic adoption by SSMU.

“Our student union has for the first time […] condemned the genocide in Gaza and finally taken a political stance that the student body has continuously reiterated,” they said. “Next year, we don’t know what things will look like, but our student union now has ratified a policy that ensures it’s taking a stance for the Palestinian struggle and for divestment, and so we’ll hopefully see SSMU represent the demands of the student body.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue