Latest News

Arts & Entertainment, Books, Film and TV

‘People We Meet on Vacation’: Best friends, right?

Warning: This piece contains spoilers.

The highly anticipated movie adaptation of Emily Henry’s beloved second adult book, People We Meet on Vacation, directed by Brett Haley, premiered on Netflix on Jan. 9. The number one New York Times bestselling story follows Poppy and Alex, two best friends who meet every summer for over a decade to share a week-long vacation. That is, until their friendship falls apart after a tumultuous trip to Italy, during which they almost kiss. Narrated through flashbacks, the film revisits their past vacations while simultaneously exploring their current trip to Barcelona, where they attempt to rekindle the broken friendship that once nearly evolved into something more.

Leading the charge is My Lady Jane actor Emily Bader as Poppy Wright, alongside The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes veteran Tom Blyth as Alex Nilsen. The movie depicts the leads’ unfolding friendship and blossoming romance through picturesque scenery and palpable chemistry. These features ensure the film lives up to the quality of Henry’s work, which has become a phenomenon in recent years.

With charming warmth reminiscent of classic 90s romcoms like 13 Going on 30 and Notting Hill, the film masterfully employs beloved romance tropes, such as friends-to-lovers and forced proximity. Poppy is bright and adventurous, while Alex is steady and dependable. While she wanders the world, he remains in their rural hometown. Although they seem like polar opposites, they form a strong bond that deepens through their yearly trips to places like Squamish, New Orleans, and Tuscany. In this classic tale of opposites-attract that rivals that of Harry Burns and Sally Albright in Rob Reiner’s When Harry Met Sally, Poppy’s bright energy balances Alex’s tranquillity. Yet, on their annual trips, Alex reveals a different and carefree side to his personality, which Poppy affectionately calls “Vacation Alex.”

“I’m only weird when I’m with you,” Alex tells Poppy in what stands out as the film’s strongest scene, after the characters complete a dance routine whilst playing dress-up as newlyweds. The film brilliantly depicts a deep connection between two people who have grown to love each other over a decade, an intimacy many of us hopeless romantics yearn to experience someday. Bader’s vulnerability and Blyth’s swoon-worthy performance make the almost two-hour run time pass like a blur.

Despite minor changes, People We Meet on Vacation, remains a faithful adaptation of the original work. One slight weak point lies in its treatment of Sarah, Alex’s on-again-off-again girlfriend, played by The White Lotus’s Sarah Catherine Hook. The book’s explanation of Sarah and Alex’s problems is replaced by a stronger emphasis on Alex and Poppy’s relationship in the movie. 

Moreover, Alex proposes to Sarah in the film, a moment that never occurs in the book, and their relationship also has fewer issues in the adaptation. These changes make the movie seem like a horror story from Sarah’s perspective: The film casts her as a nice and slightly naïve woman stuck between two best friends who have very few boundaries with each other. She seems like a woman whose long-term boyfriend—who she loves deeply—appears to have been in love with another woman for a long time. 

After watching the film, I felt deep pity for Sarah, which was absent when reading the book. Still, the movie gives her a happy ending, and as Poppy and Alex finally find their way back to each other, she, too, finds what she wanted by becoming a flight attendant and leaving her small town. People We Meet on Vacation is a fun and easy watch that may inspire you to book a vacation to Europe and perhaps even risk ruining a close friendship for the sake of love. The film stands out as a classic romantic comedy that leaves audiences longing for a love like that of Poppy and Alex.

Science & Technology

Plurilingual Lab restarts Grad Talk series with a discussion on multilingual classrooms

McGill’s Plurilingual Lab resumed its Grad Talks series on Jan. 15 as part of an initiative to highlight graduate students’ research on language education while also allowing them to receive constructive feedback from other researchers. The first talk of the year was led by Tiffany Tam, a University of Toronto master’s student who studies how teacher identity and multilingualism intersect in Ontario’s K-12 classrooms. 

Tam focused her talk on how teacher candidates (TCs) shape their professional identities based on their multilingual and racial backgrounds, and how these choices influence their teaching. She developed her framework regarding TC experience based on multiple case studies from schools in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) using raciolinguistics, which examines how race and language are intertwined.

In her research, Tam determined that current GTA classrooms often push English as the sole language for K-12 education. She noted that this is especially true for TCs, who often receive education in environments where learning in multiple languages is discouraged. As such, many TCs compartmentalize their multilingual identities rather than treating them as a valuable resource.

“Language patterns can be very different,” Tam explained. “But what you have in your mind, in your written and spoken language, are valuable. They can help you speak English better because you already know one or two more languages already.”

Due to this compartmentalization, Tam argued that TCs lose their cultural identity. Her research found that some TCs divorce themselves from their previous identities to easily integrate with Canadian culture, as shown in one of the TC case studies. Tam described how the TC in question gradually lost their native language fluency as they acclimated to Canada, so they sought to introduce more languages into Teacher Education Programs (TEPs). This measure would help students understand the value of speaking multiple languages in diverse environments.

However, since many TCs believe that multilingual students’ English development falls under the responsibility of English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers, success is often limited. Tam corroborated this example with another case study, explaining how an ESL student struggled to understand English concepts, like cars. The student only understood after a TC described cars in Arabic, saying sayaara hamraa, meaning a red car.

Tam’s research also highlighted the insufficient education about race and language within TEPs, stating that her research participants felt that discussions surrounding race were often surface-level in classroom settings. She discussed how racialized speakers are still seen as ‘deficient’ speakers, with a separation between ‘native’ and ‘non-native’ English-speaking TCs. Tam explained how this “binarization of languages” serves to reinforce raciolinguistic stereotypes. This racialized perception often led to erroneous assumptions, as TCs with multilingual identities were presumed to be learning English as a second language.

Furthermore, Tam noted how TC practicum experiences differ across socioeconomic settings. In private schools, which often have a majority of white and Asian students, she emphasized how English is typically the only language heard in classrooms. In contrast, public schools often have classrooms where a myriad of languages can be heard. 

Tam explained this discrepancy as a result of students’ backgrounds: Public schools have more immigrant students who arrived in Canada with diverse language backgrounds. Despite the growing number of immigrant students, TEPs for public schools remain unchanging, hindering TCs’ teaching capabilities when it comes to educating ESL students. To improve this, Tam concludes that a multilingual framework celebrating language diversity can be adopted across schools.

“I believe that TEPs have to be up to date to meet the needs of these multilingual TCs and students in Ontario, as well as the changing climate of race, racialization, and language,” Tam said. “This has been an area that has always been taken for granted and pushed aside in education studies.”

McGill, News, PGSS

PGSS votes to dissolve several committees

On Wednesday, Jan. 15, the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) met in the Thomson House ballroom for its first meeting of the semester, commencing with an announcement advertising seven new positions that are open for election, including Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, and External Affairs. They also mentioned the annual referendum, which will review the student services fee. The fee is currently $200 CAD per year per student, but the referendum proposes a percentage increase. 

Secretary General Sheheryar Ahmed announced an interest among PGSS executives to host a town hall in the near future, offering to conduct the event after the February council meeting. Ahmed continued to describe the importance of hosting town halls. 

“This will be an opportunity to submit discussion topics and devote more time to them than is available at council meetings typically, and we won’t be following the same structure [….] We’ll just have much more time to address those kinds of concerns in an open forum,” Ahmed said. “It’s a really positive democratic experience. Hopefully we can start doing this every year.” 

Ahmed then went on to introduce a series of motions to dissolve inherited organizations within PGSS, claiming these committees are unfulfilled and stifle the administrative process. The motions would remove the Policy Structure and Advisory Committee, the Student Rights and Advocacy Committee, and the Governance Committee. He also shared that the Funding Working Group would be dissolved and reconstituted as a standing committee of council. 

The Governance Committee is responsible for addressing any legislative changes that the council wants to pass and is composed of three people who do not hold titled positions in PGSS. The issue with this, Ahmed noted, is that it is difficult to staff each year, as most active members of PGSS hold titled positions and therefore cannot work on the Governance Committee. 

Ahmed stated that, as chair of the committee, the Secretary General can fulfill the responsibilities of the Policy and Structure Advisory Committee without the specified seven members, claiming that the existence of a committee to fulfill these tasks only duplicates work being done. 

The Student Rights and Advocacy Committee used to be chaired by the Students’ Rights and Advocacy Commissioner, a position that was dissolved two years ago and replaced with the Funding and Supervision Commissioner. However, despite the chaired position no longer existing, the Student Rights and Advocacy Committee was never formally dissolved. 

As the meeting progressed, Internal Affairs Officer Naga Thovinakere echoed previous concerns from a governance standpoint, sharing worries with other council members who felt the dissolution of committees may not be the correct solution.

“My understanding with the role of the Governance Committee is it’s supposed to check and balance,” Thovinakere said. “I have a sense that the solution that we’re moving towards might not be the right one. Just because it has been vacant and redundant and inactive, might not be the actual reason to dissolve a committee. It exists for a reason.”

Debate over the dissolution continued, and University Affairs Officer Amina Bourai defended the proposal to dissolve the committees.

“I would be the first person to say if I saw something that was unfair, if something would alter the democracy of the society,” Bourai said. “But […] we have the [General Assembly (GA)], we have council, we have special GAs, we have executive meetings, commissioner meetings, senate. We have meetings with students all the time, with issues that they bring up.” 

In the end, Motions 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, all concerned with the dissolutions, were carried with 25, 27, and 22 votes, respectively.

Moment of the Meeting

PGSS announced a series of initiatives in the following weeks to spread awareness on Academic Bullying from Jan. 26 to Jan. 30, during which graduate students can stop by the Thomson House to spin a trivia wheel on academic bullying in exchange for a free cookie. 

Soundbite

“I think maybe a potential solution would be to sort of merge some committees and then increase the numbers to not overburden the existing committees that seem to do the work [….] Then maybe we can look at a better resolution to incorporate what the other students’ concerns are […] that is probably enlarging some of the committees.” — Financial Affairs Officer, Mandy Lokko 

McGill, News

McGill Senate discusses identification policy, election rules, and budget outlook

On Jan. 14, the McGill Senate convened for its first meeting of the Winter 2026 Semester, discussing a proposed codification of the Senate’s electoral procedures, a draft identification policy governing access to university spaces, and McGill’s budget outlook for the 2026-2027 fiscal year.

The meeting began with McGill’s President and Vice-Chancellor Deep Saini’s opening remarks, in which he gave thanks to outgoing Provost and Executive Vice-President Academic Christopher Manfredi. Saini announced in November that current Interim Deputy Provost Student Life & Learning Angela Campbell will replace Manfredi beginning Feb. 1.

Secretary-General Edyta Rogowska then presented a proposed codification of Senate electoral procedures, scheduled for approval at the Senate’s next meeting on Feb. 11. 

“Historically, Senate elections have been administered in line with […] statutory provisions [and] longstanding administrative practices,” Rogowska said. “While these practices have generally functioned well, they have not been consolidated into a single Senate-approved framework, which these procedures now provide.”

During the discussion, Senator Victor Muñiz-Fraticelli, associate professor in the Faculty of Law, raised concerns regarding the proposal’s ranked-choice voting process.

“The option of not ranking someone is […] unavailable under the current ranking system,” Muñiz-Fraticelli noted. “The truth is, very often, we either have absolutely no opinion about some of the candidates […] or perhaps we have a very strong, negative opinion about a particular candidate, and we would not like to rank them.”

The Senate then discussed the proposed Identification Policy for Access to Properties Owned, Occupied, or Used by the University, presented by Vice-President Administration and Finance Fabrice Labeau. If approved, this policy would allow authorized personnel—such as exam invigilators, faculty and staff, and campus security—to demand students, faculty, staff, and visitors identify themselves by providing IDs or removing face coverings “for a legitimate purpose.”

Amina Bourai, University Affairs Officer for McGill’s Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS), expressed concern for what she saw as the “multiple red flags” in the policy.

“We are asking professors and staff to act as quasi-security officers, which is neither appropriate nor safe,” Bourai said. “Even police officers cannot force someone to identify themselves, unless detained or arrested. This policy is going to have a very chilling and punitive impact on students that […] must protect their identity during protests and public events.”

Senator Victoria Kaspi, representative of the Board of Governors, then acknowledged that this policy may help ensure campus security, citing her experience with classroom disruptions involving individuals wearing face coverings.

“[I am] someone who was strongly impacted in [the] classroom by masked intruders who disrupted class and physically blocked my entry to the classroom,” Kaspi shared. “Without any way to identify, anyone from anywhere can come and choose to influence, disrupt, vandalize, or […] affect peace on campus.” 

Bourai commented that the identification policy risks discrimination against certain groups.

“It is fully guaranteed that this policy will be applied unequally. Even with training, police officers always fall disproportionately on marginalized people,” Bourai said. “I find it very troubling knowing the steps that this province is currently taking to force the unveiling of Muslim women.”

The meeting ended with Manfredi presenting the Budget Planning 2026-2027 Report. Manfredi’s budget report estimates McGill will deliver a balanced operating budget for the coming fiscal year starting on May 1, 2026, despite its major deficit in 2025. 

“Language requirements, immigration changes, and uncertainty around student permit allocations all affect our ability to recruit students,” he noted. “Because more than 80 per cent of our operating revenue is enrollment-driven, even small shifts can have outsized financial consequences.”

Despite the impact of declining tuition revenue, Manfredi emphasized that measures to reduce McGill’s budget deficit should not be conflated with a shift in the university’s priorities.

“It’s not panic-driven crisis management, and it’s not austerity for its own sake. No one involved finds any of that appealing. Ultimately, the goal is to have sufficient resources to reasonably invest in the key elements of our core mission.”

Moment of the meeting 

When discussing the proposed identification policy, Senator Donald Morard compared the identification requirements to his own experiences completing his Master’s Degree in Russia under high security presence.

Soundbite
“We may want security, and in fact the majority of us want it, but it cannot come at the expense of people’s rights and entitlements to be treated as equals [….] You cannot balance rights and security.” – Catherine Lu, Political Science professor, on the ID requirement.

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

The Golden Globes: A party while the world burns

Scrolling online on Sunday, Jan. 11, meant watching red carpet roundups bleed into footage of war crimes unfolding in real time. Headlines about Gaza, Iran, and the escalation in Venezuela nestled neatly between Golden Globes outfits, acceptance speech clips, and comedy bits. Somewhere between the fringe, fur, and feathers, the world started to feel like a grotesque circus. How did this become the norm we’ve collectively agreed to digest? 

The 83rd annual Golden Globes packed in and spurred its usual share of entertainment: Best and worst dressed lists, viral clips, and extensive coverage of the year’s biggest stars; and yes, DiCaprio’s favourite food is still pasta. One Battle After Another and Hamnet brought home the top film awards, whilst Adolescence swept yet another award ceremony. The stars of Heated Rivalry became some of the most talked-about figures in attendancedespite not even being nominated. 

What grabbed my attention, however, was the Globes’ aggressive promotion of gambling culture. Throughout the ceremony, the crypto-based, right-leaning prediction market Polymarket dominated our screens at home, egging viewers to bet on the nominees in real time. Since when does an awards show meant to celebrate the arts double as a sportsbook? Must every cultural event become yet another opportunity to cash out? Betting boards were also displayed inside the room, so nominees could see how little the betting public believed in them, along with everyone else in the room—a fun boost for the ego, that one. 

Two-time host and comedian Nikki Glaser helmed the ship with confidence and playful quips, later admitting she held back on more politically inclined jokes. Remarks on Trump, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the current state of the country’s politics were deemed too serious, too horrid to comment on without trivializing. Yet jabs at the Justice Department over edits to the Epstein files and at CBS News—on its own network—were fair game. The audience was charmed. Satire is always welcome, as long as it doesn’t wander too close to the fire, right? In a time where reality is already grotesque, choosing restraint doesn’t neutralize harm; it just sanitizes it. 

Some stars did attempt to step close. Mark Ruffalo, Wanda Sykes, and others wore “BE GOOD” and “ICE OUT” pins to protest recent fatal ICE shootings against Renee Nicole Good and Keith Porter. Ruffalo spoke on the carpet, calling out Trump and ICE, admitting he couldn’t stay quiet in the face of ongoing horrors happening in the U.S. The gestures were sincere. They were also subtle enough that most viewers likely missed them entirely, small symbols and moments lost unless you already knew to look for them. 

The award show further delegitimized itself through its soundtrack, having its stars walk onstage to nightclub songs. Stellan Skarsgård, just over 70 years old and accepting an award for the tragicomedy-drama Sentimental Value, received his award to the tune of Usher’s “Yeah!The Secret Agent, a film about fascism, had to accept its win for Best Foreign Language Film to Rihanna’s “Pon de Replay.” Classy. Appropriate, even. The tonal whiplash didn’t just feel out of touch; it signalled a lack of respect for the work being honoured. Guess we’re trading the arts for the club in 2026?

Film and television are already under an industrial threat, as studios consolidate under streaming platforms and theatrical releases are sidelined. If these ceremonies serve any purpose beyond ridiculous spectacle, they should celebrate artistic achievements. Instead, the Golden Globes leaned into blatant cash grabs, sidelining long-standing categories like ‘Best Score’ in favour of a promotional UFC skit, courtesy of Paramount. Still, beneath the ugly, something remains worth salvaging: The artists and their labour. When every alarm is ringing at once, the least the room can do is acknowledge the fire waiting outside. 

Sports

Controversy in the cold: Katie Uhlaender makes accusations of Olympic sabotage

The International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation (IBSF) has denied the allegations of Olympic ‘sabotage’ involving the Canadian national team and cleared the coaching staff of any wrongdoing. The controversy stems from American skeleton veteran Katie Uhlaender, a five-time Olympian whose hopes of competing at a sixth Winter Games Milano Cortina were swiped from her despite winning a key qualifying race. 

The disagreement came down to how skeleton athletes earn Olympic qualification points. Points are not only based on finishing position, but are also tied to the size of the field. The more athletes in a race, the more points are available. In this situation, four of the six Canadian women who had originally been entered in a North American Cup race in Lake Placid from Jan. 7 to 11 were withdrawn before competition. That significantly reduced the field size, which lowered the total points that could be earned. Although Uhlaender won the race, the reduced points haul meant she could no longer qualify for the Olympics.

Uhlaender, one of the most experienced athletes in the sport, accused the Canadian head coach of intentionally withdrawing athletes to manipulate the points system. From her perspective, the decision was a strategic move to protect Canada’s Olympic spots by limiting the ability of rival athletes to earn points. This was perceived as a clear message that even winning was not enough when tactical decisions could override performance.

Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton (BCS) has strongly rejected those allegations. The organization insists the withdrawals had nothing to do with points or Olympic strategy, but instead had everything to do with athlete welfare. According to BCS, the athletes who were pulled were young and relatively inexperienced, and they had already endured a difficult week on a demanding track. After assessing their readiness, coaches concluded the athletes were not prepared to race for a third consecutive time, and withdrawing them was framed as a responsible decision rooted in safety and long-term development.

This clash of perspectives highlights why the situation has become so controversial. On one hand, Uhlaender’s frustration is entirely understandable. Winning a qualifying race is usually the only thing that matters, and for athletes who have worked for so long to achieve this dream, having it stripped away would be devastating. The idea that another team’s roster decisions can determine the value of a victory feels fundamentally wrong, especially for something as highly regarded as Olympic qualification.

On the other hand, Canada’s explanation cannot be dismissed outright. Coaches regularly make judgment calls about athlete readiness and risk, particularly in extreme sports like this, where mistakes can lead to serious injury. Athlete safety is not a convenient excuse; it is a legitimate reason and is necessary to protect the team and its athletes.

The deeper issue seems to lie not in proving malicious intent, but in the structure of the qualification system itself. The fact that this controversy is even possible exposes a colossal flaw in how points are awarded. A system where the withdrawal of athletes could alter another competitor’s participation is logistically unsound. Even if Canada acted in good faith, it is hard not to see how it could have been manipulated. 

Ultimately, this controversy is not just about Canada versus the United States or athlete versus federation. It is about whether Olympic qualification systems truly reflect athletic performance. The investigation may have determined responsibility, but it is clear to see that when winning on the track is not enough, the system itself needs reform. Olympic dreams should fall to the fate of hard work and performance, not the unintended consequences of decisions made behind the scenes. 

Arts & Entertainment, Pop Rhetoric

Welcome back, 2016

Today’s agenda: Perfecting your duck face, finding the rarest Pokémon on PokemonGo, and blasting Zara Larsson‘s “Lush Life” from your iPod touch. Bliss.

History may not repeat itself, but trends do—and right now, nostalgia is staging a dramatic return. According to the BBC, TikTok searches for ‘2016’ have risen by 452 per cent in the past two weeks. The minimalist, muted tones of 2025 are out, and the unapologetic cringe of 2016 is back in.

In honour of 2016’s comeback, here are the ultimate throwback highlights in fashion, pop culture, and music.

Skinny jeans

Skinny jeans were an absolute staple in every 2016 wardrobe. Looking to find something more unique? Why not try ripped skinny jeans, or pair them with your favourite Converse high-tops? Brands released skinny jeans in all colours and styles, with American Eagle and Old Navy leading the way.  Icons like Kendall Jenner, Gigi Hadid, and Jennifer Lawrence turned skinny jeans into a must-have look. While baggy jeans now dominate, skinny jeans still hold a sacred place in fashion history. It even seems as though skinny jeans are making a comeback—whether this is a blessing or a curse is up for debate.

Coachella

Hosted in Indio, California, Coachella was not just a music festival, it was the music festival of 2016. Known as the defining event of the time, Coachella was what every teen and young adult dreamed of. Those lucky enough to attend planned for months, while everyone else refreshed their Instagram feeds and Snapchat stories in desperate anticipation. Influencers flooded their feeds with sporting flower crowns, boho-chic, and peace signs. Coachella 2016 was the biggest Coachella to date, making $84 million USD in revenue. Headliners included Major Lazer, Guns n’ Roses, Calvin Harris, and Sia. It wasn’t just a festival; it was a place of self-expression, and a symbol of the cultural moment of freedom and community defined by social media, fashion, and music.

Musical.ly

Before TikTok’s rebrand, we called it ‘Musical.ly.’ The app allowed users to create short, lip-synced videos to popular songs and trending sounds, turning everyday teenagers into viral stars overnight. Lisa and Lena, teenage twins from Germany, went viral on the app for making dancing videos. In March 2016 alone, their number of followers increased by 256 per cent, bringing them from 112,000 to 377,000 followers. Musical.ly became a launchpad for influencers, musicians, and artists alike, encouraging creativity, humour, and self-expression. It had something for everyone, from beauty influencers like Baby Ariel to upcoming young artists like Jacob Sartorius. Its popularity highlighted a shift in how young people consumed media. It was a clear indicator of shifting focus from long-form media to short, fast-paced digital content.

 The Mannequin Challenge

Speaking of social media, the Mannequin Challenge was a must-try with all your friends. The trend involved groups imitating mannequins, while Rae Sremmurd’s “Black Beatles” played in the background. Soon, this trend spread to family gatherings and classrooms. One of the most famous Mannequin Challenge videos was titled ‘High School Mannequin Challenge 1500 Students’ and was uploaded by a teacher at a secondary school. This video alone had 9.4 million views. It even reached some well-known faces, from Beyoncé and The Rock to Michelle Obama and the New York Giants.

YouTube

Instead of high-tech, polished studios and scripts, YouTube allowed viewers to watch content filmed in something as simple as a bedroom. Liza Koshy was just 19 when she began making funny YouTube videos at home, but gained over five million followers almost overnight, leading her to win the Streamy’s 2016 Breakout Creator award. Creators like PewDiePie, who had more than 50 million subscribers in 2016, rose to the top by yelling at video games, somehow building a fanbase larger than many TV networks. They even coined their own name—the ‘Bro Army.’ On the other side of the platform, creators like Emma Chamberlain took over with chaotic vlogs, challenges, and fashion videos. Her popularity came from the personal connection she built with viewers. These forms of videos offered something television couldn’t: Intimacy and immediacy. YouTube remains a major entertainment platform today, exemplifying the idea that anyone with a camera could be a star.

And finally, the ultimate playlist of 2016

 Justin Bieber, “Love Yourself” – The perfect breakup anthem. 

 Major Lazer, “Lean On“- A must-play at any house party, club, or event that involves dancing.

Drake, “One Dance” – Smooth, rhythmic, and the perfect beat for a chilled summer night.

The Chainsmokers, “Closer” – A nostalgic and catchy pop hit, perfect for sing-alongs.

Mike Posner, “I Took a Pill In Ibiza” – For those who are at a beach club somewhere, or who wish they were.

Know Your Athlete, Sports

Know Your Athlete: Luca Nicoletti

McGill Athletics announced on Nov. 20 that it would cut the Track and Field program. Just nine days later, Luca Nicoletti, U3 Engineering, shattered the team’s longest-standing record by breaking the 300-meter dash mark that had stood since 1986. Nicoletti clocked a 34.11-second finish—three milliseconds faster than Earl Haughton’s 34.14-second record—at the Martlets Open Meet on Nov. 29, the team’s first competition of the season. In an interview with The Tribune, Nicoletti reflected on his emotions before and after the race.

“Going into the meet alone was insane because our team was getting cancelled. I had ‘SAVE MCGILL TRACK’ written all over my arms. I wanted to show the school that our team is still competitive,” Nicoletti said. “After the race and seeing the time was exciting. I’m like, at least [McGill Athletics] gets to know what they are missing out on.”

Nicoletti’s expectations were high going into this meet. After showing consistent progress over the summer, he wanted to break 34 seconds, putting him closer to the Tomlinson Fieldhouse record of 32.94 seconds set by Shane Niemi from York University in 2014. He also hopes to get a spot on the podium at the U SPORTS Track & Field Championships in March.

“I think [breaking 34 seconds] will come this season, but this was a mini-achievement and a mini-milestone on the way to U SPORTS, which was super exciting.”

Nicoletti started his track career at École secondaire catholique Paul-Desmarais in Ottawa, where he represented his high school team. However, he began training outside of school at the Ottawa Lions Club in 2019 at his friend’s insistence. Nicoletti competed in the Ontario Federation of School Athletic Associations Championship youth category that year, placing first and second in the 100-metre hurdles and 300-metre hurdles, respectively. 

“I was like a big success off of very little training, so it solidified it as a sport for me there,” Nicoletti said. 

Despite both his early promise and recent success, Nicoletti endured a serious hamstring injury during his first year on the McGill team. During his recovery, he prioritized regaining his speed, which ultimately led him to transition to short-distance events. Having moved away from his family a few months earlier, Nicoletti found it especially difficult to cope with the setback. 

“I was losing two things I was comfortable with. I was away from my family, and I would have had the familiarity of track, but I lost that as well,” Nicoletti said. “Watching others get better wasn’t the worst part of it, but it was more just not getting to do the things I love doing.”

His injury, however, led him to appreciate the sport even more. 

“On my recovery journey, every workout was painful, but I was just smiling. I remember the first summer back, my friend and I threw up after training. He was like, ‘Man, this sucks.’ I was like, ‘I’m just happy I can do this.’”

Nicoletti also attributed the success of his recovery journey to his coach, Tyrone Edge, and his teammates.

“Coach Edge is really good with competitive athletes, and he helped me get back into fashion after my injury,” Nicoletti said. “I think you have to have the self-discipline to train on your own, but you need your teammates to make the pain throughout the season worth it.”

Entering his third season with the team, Nicoletti approached training with far greater intention, restructuring nearly every aspect of his life around track. He began taking his diet more seriously, closely monitoring his protein intake and incorporating supplements that support recovery. 

While his dedication paid off, the news of the track team’s cut casts a lingering shadow over the moment, complicating what should have been a purely celebratory milestone.

“It’s bittersweet because what if my record is the last one that gets recorded? People are coming up to me and saying how you might have it forever, but I want the rookies under me to be able to challenge it and break it.”

Commentary, Opinion

Mayor Soraya Martinez Ferrada is not serious about fighting homelessness

This past week, Montreal’s new mayor, Soraya Martinez Ferrada, announced her first budget, in which she plans to triple spending on homelessness initiatives. Her new Tactical Intervention Group on Homelessness (GITI) commits $29.9 million CAD to policing infrastructure, surveillance in public places, and social workers. 

Despite the increase in allocated resources to fighting homelessness, Martinez Ferrada’s government has missed the big picture: The only way to solve the homelessness crisis is to put people in homes. However, Martinez Ferrada’s government has scrapped the 20-20-20 bylaw that required developers to allot 20 per cent of their units to social housing, 20 per cent to affordable units, and 20 per cent to family-sized units. 

By scrapping the bylaw, Martinez Ferrada’s pledge to address the unhoused crisis in Montreal will persist unfulfilled. Instead of connecting more people with affordable housing, this approach will force more people onto the street.

There are two major types of homelessness: Visible homelessness which refers to people who are sleeping on the street, and hidden homelessness, referring to people who have no fixed address, bounce between friends’ couches, sleep in their cars, or live in shelters. In the fight against visible homelessness, the THRT could be quite useful. Martinez Ferrada’s emphasis on locating where many unhoused people are and providing them with the resources to get into some kind of shelter directly tackles the crisis. 

However, the GITI—and Martinez Ferrada’s budget plan in general—does nothing to combat hidden homelessness. The social workers hired for work under the GITI cannot help a person if they do not already know the person is looking for help. It is impractical to design support systems for unhoused people in which police are expected to go up to everyone on the street and ask if they need help looking for an apartment. Hidden homelessness can only be wholly addressed by creating permanent, affordable housing options something which the 20-20-20 bylaw aimed to achieve. 

According to the Institut de la statistique du Québec (ISQ), about seven per cent of Quebecers aged 15 or older have experienced hidden homelessness in their lives, while 0.9 per cent of Quebecers experienced visible homelessness. The primary identified cause of hidden homelessness is eviction followed by individuals not being able to find a new, affordable place.

With more affordable housing, individuals experiencing homelessness will have an easier time finding another place after being evicted. Shelters are another solution, as might be the GITI—but these are not mutually exclusive of affordable housing. 

Martinez Ferrada’s repealing of the 20-20-20 bylaw reduces the number of affordable units available for people experiencing homelessness or financial insecurity. When announcing her decision to repeal the bylaw, Martinez Ferrada claimed that the regulation’s requirements actually prevented new development in Montreal by discouraging developers from building more housing. Instead, the Martinez Ferrada administration chose to implement a set of incentives, including tax breaks, for developers to build more within the city. However, the evidence that the bylaw stemmed housing growth is not definitive.

Martinez Ferrada’s incentives offer no provisions for social and affordable housing, meaning there is no guarantee of any new affordable units for unhoused individuals experiencing hidden homelessness. While the 20-20-20 bylaw was not a guarantee of increased affordable housing, it at least ensured that something would be built. Mayor Martinez Ferrada’s new plan fails to do that. 

If the Martinez Ferrada administration wants to get serious about combatting homelessness, it needs to get serious about building affordable housing. With the repealing of the 20-20-20 bylaw, it is not off to a good start.

Prof Profiles, Science & Technology

Meet your prof: Nikolas Provatas

Despite being friends with several physics majors, when discussions of gravity and inertia inevitably shift into abstract theory, I can’t help but wonder, what is physics all about, anyway? 

If you’re studying science or engineering here at McGill—or just interested in the mysterious inner workings of physics overall—there’s a pretty high chance you’ll find yourself at some point or another sitting in Leacock 132, as one in a sea of 650 students, taking an introductory physics class. 

PHYS 102 is one such introductory course. In this introduction to electromagnetism, students learn the fundamentals of electric current, circuits, magnetism, and optics. These concepts are not only interesting but foundational to later studies in physics and engineering, and McGill students are in good hands: PHYS 102 is taught by Nikolas Provatas, a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair and member of the Department of Physics.

Like many scientists, Provatas traces his interest in science to early childhood. In an interview with The Tribune, he recalls being just seven years old when a picture book about Galileo Galilei and his theory of the pendulum captivated him.

“At that age, I had no clue about equations or anything, but I remember the text said that [Galilei] observed [his theory] by watching […] how long it takes the chandelier to swing,” Provatas explained. “So when I would go with my father to [his] restaurant in the morning, around 5:30 a.m. […] it would take a long time till things got busy. [So], I remember I took up a string, and I tied a little mass at the end of it. I can’t even remember what it was, [it] must have been a cup or something. And I would tie it somewhere, and I would just swing it in the kitchen and just watch it. And I remember my father looking at me, thinking, you know, like, ‘Do something productive with your life,’ [….] And I thought, ‘This is productive. The scientist did this. I’m trying to figure out how it works.’”

From here, Provatas’ curiosity continued to grow, eventually leading him through post-secondary education; he graduated from McGill with a PhD in theoretical physics in the late 1990s. 

Given that he was interested in how the world works and why it works the way it does, Provatas found theoretical physics to be a natural fit. Unlike experimental physics, which focuses on data collection and analysis, theoretical physics relies on math and other models to explain phenomena. 

After completing his PhD, Provatas went on to complete two postdoctoral positions—temporary research positions—where he explored different areas of physics. He emphasized the importance of these experiences, describing them as the academic equivalent of a doctor’s residency training.

“Labs hire you on a contract basis, and say, ‘Solve a problem or do something interesting, and then we’ll pay you to do that, and then we publish together.’ So I do the work, I publish, and then they provide me [with] some environment [or] ideas,” Provatas said.

His first postdoc was in Helsinki, Finland. 

“I spent three years at the University of Helsinki, at their Institute for Theoretical Physics, doing work there on something called Percolation theory,” Provatas explained. “It’s a theory of how random things diffuse through materials so as to percolate through them, and this is very important when considering the structure of materials, ranging from paper to even metals.”

After his time in Finland, he completed a second three-year postdoctoral appointment at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). 

It was after this second postdoc that Provatas began searching for stable work. Life as a postdoc is inherently uncertain; each job is contracted for a specified number of years, after which researchers are left to find new roles, potentially on opposite ends of the globe.

“I literally owned nothing because I knew that in any apartment I would go, whether here as a PhD, in Helsinki as a postdoc, [in the] United States as a postdoc, I knew I couldn’t really buy stuff because I’d be on the move in a couple of years,” Provatas explained. “So literally, I would just have my backpack and a suitcase to hold some clothes, and that was my whole ownership at that time.”

At UIUC, he worked under two professors: one in statistical thermodynamics and another in mechanical engineering. Mentorship from this engineer proved to be pivotal to Provatas’s future career, as he taught him how to communicate his research in ‘engineering terms’ rather than purely theoretical language

“He taught me how to talk the talk and walk the walk of engineers, and to focus on what’s important when you sales pitch your stuff to engineers versus just pure scientists,” Provatas said. “And he actually made me wear a suit to give conferences. And I started to go to engineering conferences and give seminars.”

It was through attending these engineering conferences that Provatas was able to land a job at Bush Paper Company, working as a Research and Development scientist. Eventually, through his work at Bush, Provatas was invited to apply for a professorship at McMaster University—not in the physics department, but rather in the materials science and engineering department.

“I thought, ‘Oh, boy, you know, this is nice.’ I’ve always wanted to be a prof, but I thought it’d be a physics prof.” Provatas said. “I didn’t know I’d go work as an engineering prof. So I practiced and practiced and got over the fear, and I went and gave an interview, and to my shock, they hired me.” 

Provatas worked at McMaster for 11 years. It was only after an opportunity to teach physics at the university level—as opposed to materials science and engineering—that Provatas left McMaster. This opportunity was from none other than McGill University. 

“I’ve been here since 2012, teaching physics, doing research on the same topic. I’m still a material scientist, but looking at it from a very physics[-oriented] point of view,” Provatas explained. “What ultimately made me make the transition from an engineering department to a physics department, is that you know, you can ask the questions that, on one hand, they could be useful, but on the other hand, it could be very impractical, but you know, it’s there. So, ‘Why does gravity work?’ So someone might say,’ Oh, come on, do something important [and] practical with your life,’ but [gravity is] there. I see it. It acts on me every day.”

As a professor, whether at McMaster or at McGill, Provatas has always taught freshman courses. Classes like PHYS 102 allow him to connect his research to his course content, finding ways to keep the material engaging and interesting for students. 

“I always like to take what dry theory we’re learning, and say, you know, ‘this is important, because power generation works this way. Let me show you how making material works this way. An aircraft works this way.’ And I find that students like the fact that it is connected to the real world. It’s not just ‘Oh, I’m sitting here in a physics class learning all these equations.’”

Provatas’s current research focuses on understanding the microstructures of material—in other words, how they form and how they respond to material phase changes.  

“If you now explore the depths of this material, at the level of atoms and thereabouts, you start to see that the material is just not some monolithic, boring object. It’s a myriad of interesting patterns [and] that the atoms [are] forming the tapestry of a solid form,” Provatas explained. “My research focuses on why these patterns form […] how they form, [and] what controls their formation. And it’s beautiful.”

This semester, Provatas is teaching PHYS 102 and PHYS 657—but anyone interested in learning more about physics or materials science is welcome to stop by his office hours: 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Mondays, in Rutherford 218.

While Provatas’s path to McGill wasn’t linear, his interests and curiosity led him to a career of research that his seven-year-old self may not have even been able to imagine. Ultimately, Provatas shows that the trick to life is the same as the answers to PHYS 102: Achieving through dedication and hard work, and seizing the opportunities in front of you.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue