Latest News

Art, Arts & Entertainment

Knockin’ on heaven’s Fridge Door

A staple of the student art community on McGill campus, the Fridge Door Gallery (FDG) continuously offers high-quality programming, filling the absence of a formal fine art program. On Nov. 22, the FDG hosted their fall vernissage, In Present Tense, offering free wine, homemade bread, and art to the public. The event attracted a full crowd to the small venue, Espace 8. The FDG hosts two exhibitions each year displaying sculptures, paintings, and mixed media pieces from McGill student artists. In Present Tense was thoughtfully curated with earnest and intimate art, exploring what it means to carry the weight of the past in the present.

The theme for the exhibition was the “historical present,” a phrase often tossed around when discussing contemporary art, but one that is tricky to define. FDG’s curatorial statement describes it as the point when “our present become[s] our past—rational rather than affective.” 

Rather than an exact moment, the historical present tense is a transitional relationship between the present and past that the works attempt to catch. Many of the works feature bodies depicted in relation to time: As we are constantly in the process of ‘growing up,’ our lived experience are often expressed visually or through emotion.

Grace Pooley’s tapestry-sized acrylic paintings exemplify both the decay and fullness of life through paintings of women’s bodies. In a similar sense, Maddy Holton’s mixed media piece, //stain//, shows the material impact of lived reality on the clothes we wear, adorning space and time with the experience of a stain on a shirt. As the curatorial statement reads, “These works consider what it means to be a body in time-mutable, conditioned, and conditioning.”

A standout piece from the exhibition was a photograph entitled New Jacket by Marie Saadeh. Featured on the cover of the exhibition guide, the image encompasses the historical present gracefully in a captured moment of vulnerable transience. The picture depicts an older man trying on a jacket in a thrift store, examining the jacket and his own figure in the mirror. While he inspects the jacket from the side, he turns his head as if he is hesitant to confront the image before him. The jacket represents hope and possibility, a means of self-preservation and self presentation. The framing of the photo adds to the sense of intimacy—an out-of-focus door frame surrounds three sides of the picture, yet viewers get a crystal clear view of the man’s mirror image. The mundane act of buying a new jacket at a thrift store is incorporating a piece of history into your own. New Jacket gives an intimate look into a moment full of vulnerability and possibility.

The artists’ statements were beautifully eloquent, a testament to the fact that many of the student artists are in McGill’s Department of Art History and Communication Studies. Additionally, the inclusion of each artists’ Instagram handle next to the titles reflects the present state of the art world—often, the only way to access a student’s art collection is through online display. While the works in the gallery were presented in a physical form, many of them focused on digital subject matter. Gemma Else’s watercolour selfie series not only demonstrates that selfies are modern-day portraiture, but also comments on how they are displayed. Aidan Hepburn’s still-life window scenes were originally made on digital mediums, seeing it portrayed on a scale larger than a laptop screen allowed its intricate artistry to shine through in a public setting, far away from a private desktop. 

Overall, the vernissage was a delightful evening celebrating the artistic talent and passion of McGill’s student artists. Without a formal fine arts program at McGill, the FDG provides a valuable platform for promoting student creativity in a public setting.

McGill, News

Unsolicited phone call elicits concern from students about patient privacy

Social media posts made by a McGill student about the Student Wellness Hub sparked criticism about the Hub’s accessibility. Charlie Baranski, U3 Arts, tweeted on Nov. 15 about the Hub rescheduling a therapy appointment which he made over 80 days prior. Two hours later, he received an unsolicited phone call from one of the assistant directors of the Wellness Hub who wanted to address his tweet.

Baranski felt that his privacy was breached and expressed his frustration to The McGill Tribune.

“We spoke for about 15 minutes, and he told me [that] he got my number from my record and wanted to address my complaints,” Baranski said. “Obviously that was insane to me. I felt very uncomfortable knowing that my information had been accessed like that and I was thinking if I had been at the same place with my mental health as I was a couple years ago […] that would not have helped my situation to say the least.”

On Nov. 18, Baranski made a post on his Facebook page, suggesting that the Hub’s immediate response to his tweet demonstrated that public image was a higher priority to McGill administrators than student well-being. He discussed his concern for those in more dire mental health circumstances.

“It’s pretty obvious that the system at [McGill] is set up to protect [the] reputation of the Wellness Hub first and the health of students second,” Baranski said. “[This] is completely insane, because there are students at McGill who are more vulnerable than me, who are suffering because of this obsession [with] reputation. If they helped those students, their reputation will get better, because then the Facebook posts and tweets will get a lot better.”

In an email to the Tribune, Executive Director of Student Services Martine Gauthier explained that this issue has been addressed with student representatives, and that phone calls of such nature will not happen again.

“When we hear about students who have had trouble accessing services, we try to find solutions,” Gauthier wrote. “In some cases, we reach out by phone.  In our conversations with student representatives, it’s been made clear that expectations about communication have changed and that we need to stick to the platform on which we’re addressed [….] We deeply regret if we have offended students that found this intrusive.”

Student dissatisfaction regarding wait times to access services, physical inaccessibility of the building, and the cost of student health plans were highlighted during a protest outside the Brown Student Services Building on Nov. 12. Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President University Affairs Madeline Wilson emphasized more accessibility barriers that need to be addressed by the Hub.

“[Further barriers include] not having a counsellor dedicated for racialized students, not having a non-cisgender member of the Pride Team, not being able to afford the cost of private or community care they know they’ll be triaged out to, or not even being able to physically access the Brown Building because the button on the automatic door is broken,” Wilson wrote in an email to the Tribune.

Vera Romano, Director of the Student Wellness Hub, maintains that student feedback currently being collected will help the Hub increase its accessibility. Although three psychiatrists, six general practitioners (GP), and three nurses, have been added to the team during the Fall 2019 semester, Romano explained that the structure of Quebec’s healthcare system has limited the recruitment of healthcare professionals.

“The provincial health ministry doesn’t include hours spent with our students in the hours doctors are required to work, so all of our GPs give time above and beyond their already full workload,” Romano wrote in an email to the Tribune. “The average number of drop-ins with GPs has nearly doubled since the beginning of the semester [….] We have increased the average number of pre-booked appointments available by approximately 150 per cent.”

Baranski urges the Hub to use their resources more effectively.

“Get off the phone with me and give students the therapy [that] they need,” Baranski said.

Commentary, Opinion

SSMU Executives are not paid enough

Many McGill students do not seem to hold Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) executives in high regard. In fact, one can easily find criticisms of these officials in student publications and on social media. What is more, the majority of students cannot even be bothered to vote in SSMU elections. Faced with these facts, it is only natural to start questioning the validity of a student-funded $30,000 annual salary for these apparently unpopular executives.

As students’ representatives to the McGill administration, however, SSMU executives carry a significant and crucial responsibility, one that comes with its fair share of work and stress. Any decrease of their salary would prove harmful for the health of the university’s student union, and disrespectful of the time and effort they put into their work. Being a SSMU executive is a full-time job, and therefore, it should be compensated as such. 

On Feb. 3, 2016, McGill students voted “no” to a SSMU semesterly fee increase which was designed to, among other things, fund the salaries of SSMU executives. Ben Ger, the SSMU president at the time, lamented the outcome of the vote. According to Ger, his pay does not adequately reflect the sheer volume of work the job requires from him and his fellow executives, who are expected to work a standard 40-hour work week, but routinely work up to 90 hours per week. Juggling class and work, SSMU executives regularly find themselves paid well below the $12.50 Quebec minimum wage. 

Individuals holding official positions in student unions across the country are unequivocally overworked to a damaging extent. Additionally, executives frequently find themselves the recipients of criticism from the student body, which can be equally harmful. In October of last year, then–Vice-President (External Affairs) Marina Cupido resigned due to mental health concerns. Beyond McGill, the  University of Toronto Students’ Union Vice-President External resigned last year over ‘mental trauma’ caused by an allegedly ‘toxic’ work environment. Similarly, the Concordia Student Union has expressed concern about their employees’ psychological well being, and are considering adopting extra measures to address mental health within the union. 

The insufficient salary of SSMU executives also hinders accessibility to students who wish to participate in student governance but do not have the means to do so. Indeed, students at the school pay some of the highest residence fees in the country. Many of them are also experiencing the financial pressure that comes with living alone for the first time. For these students, a mediocre salary, coupled with the stress of long hours, becomes a barrier to participation in student government. 

Despite the crushing pressure of their jobs and the endless tides of complaints directed against them, SSMU executives often prove to be fantastically productive. Annually, The McGill Tribune publishes a review detailing every acting SSMU executive’s achievements during the previous year, and the list is invariably extensive. The first floor of McLennan library is open 24 hours per day thanks to SSMU. Activity Nights and Frosh both exist as results of SSMU initiatives. This isn’t to say that the executives are perfect, a quick scroll through Reddit’s /r/McGill forum will give the reader a detailed description of SSMU’s flaws. But then again, no elected public representative can escape the criticism of those they represent. In a functional democracy, one could argue that it is precisely the elector’s role to keep the elected in check. 

SSMU executives’ low salary is indicative of a larger issue of undervalued labour on campus. Services such as Walksafe, the Sexual Assault Centre of McGill Student Society (SACOMSS), Nightline, and the Peer Support Centre do indispensable work, and are not nearly close to being compensated enough for their emotional labour. Students are forced to choose between extracurricular opportunities and financing their degrees; therefore, these opportunities must become more accessible. 

Listening to McGill students’ persistent criticism of SSMU executives, one might be surprised that they are paid anything at all for their labour. It is important to recognize, however, that these executives are faced with the severely demanding task of overseeing multiple aspects of student life, a responsibility that often comes at the cost of mental and financial stability. The modest annual salary of $30,000 given to SSMU executives is not nearly enough when one considers the significant sacrifices in time and effort they have made in service to McGill students.

Campus Spotlight, Student Life

At home at ECOLE

Throughout the year, McGill and Milton-Parc community members can be found at the ECOLE house, located at 3559 rue University, working to advance social and environmental sustainability through a range of groups and projects. Originally called Alternative University, ECOLE was born out of the 2012 Quebec student movement, wherein students protested tuition increases and advocated for a place outside of McGill to learn, exchange ideas, and create. Today, ECOLE is a hub where students groups related to social or environmental sustainability can host events on their own or in partnership with ECOLE. 

“[ECOLE serves as a] community organizing and collective living bootcamp,” Jesse Grindler, a coordinator at ECOLE, said.

ECOLE receives funding from the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) and works closely with the organization alongside the broader Milton-Parc community. Sarah Mitchell, U4 Agriculture and Environmental Engineering and an ECOLE facilitator, emphasized its importance in working within the community. 

“[ECOLE focuses on] bridging the gap between McGill students and the Milton-Parc community,” Mitchell said.  

The Milton-Parc community has both the greatest concentration of collectives in North America and a history of activism for social change that ECOLE enhances. The first facilitator training revolved around the history of Milton-Parc, beyond being the “McGill Ghetto,” and facilitators learned about the history of citizen’s movements in preventing big industry from moving to the Milton-Parc community. ECOLE supports SSMU’s projects, such as Trash 2 Treasure, which allows Milton-Parc residents to donate their belongings during move-out week and reduces waste in the neighbourhood.

As an ECOLE facilitator, Mitchell is one of 10 upper-year McGill students who live at ECOLE. These students learn, live, and work together, creating an environment where sustainability is ingrained in everyday life. 

 In addition to their household responsibilities, facilitators carry out Applied Student Research (ASR) projects to implement more sustainable practices in the house and in McGill student life. Mitchell describes her life in the house as being energizing, though balancing schoolwork with a separate, nonacademic focus is challenging.

“[Life at ECOLE is] you have school, your club, and your house all in the same place, but your club is like three different clubs,” Mitchell said. 

Two coordinators, including Grindler, support the facilitators and the house as a whole, doing the necessary behind-the-scenes work. A board made up of representatives from all of the different stakeholders in the community also directs the vision of ECOLE. The board consists of an ECOLE facilitator, a SSMU Legislative Councilor, McGill students, McGill staff and faculty members, as well as additional Montreal community members. 

A collective will be launched in January that will allow people living outside ECOLE to get involved in leadership. The collective is just one example of how ECOLE is questioning their previous practices and reorienting for the future.

“[ECOLE is now] in the phase of seeing how it will be sustained [in the] long term,” Mitchell explained. “This means […] maintaining their flow year after year even when facilitators change and maintaining an institutional memory.”

Even the ASR projects are being reshaped to focus on smaller, more incremental changes rather than tackling more daunting issues. For example, Mitchell focused in on bulk shopping for the house and pieced together shopping bags from spare pieces of cloth. Additionally, Mitchell is working on upcycling an old bike to generate electricity.

On Nov. 27, ECOLE’s Annual General Meeting, which Grindler described as an accountability tool for the nonprofit, will take place. The meeting will be open to the public and is a great chance for students to learn about ECOLE and support its future. ECOLE’s biweekly Sunday potlucks and Thursday afternoon coffeehouses, organized with the SSMU Environment Committee, are another chance to get involved.

 Despite its renewed focus on its future, ECOLE still centres on motivated stakeholders coming together to learn from each other and advocate for sustainability.

Out on the Town, Student Life

A fast-paced night showcases slow fashion in Montreal

The McCord Museum’s ‘After Hours: Slow Fashion’ event on Nov. 21 brought together members of Montreal’s fashion community for a night of celebrating sustainable style. The night’s programming focused on promoting creative and eco-friendly clothing and highlighted creative and ethical alternatives to fast fashion, the inexpensive clothing produced by mass-market retailers to capture current fashion trends. The so-called ‘slow fashion movement’ incorporates natural colours, recycled fabrics, and locally sourced fibres as sustainable options in clothing production.  

The evening’s main spectacles were two consecutive fashion shows presented by CÉGEP Marie-Victorin’s School of Fashion. In collaboration with Ardène, the School of Fashion graduates created a line named “Remodeler,” which was on display at the McCord Museum that night. The fashion shows unveiled 20 repurposed fur coats with sustainable consumption and circular creation in mind. The after-hours event also featured pop-up shops that showcased the work of local designers and creatives, all of which incorporated sustainability into their products. 

One vendor on display was Once Again, a local fashion collective that aims to educate consumers about the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of the fashion industry. The brand offers three ethical clothing lines, each with its own unique products and solutions. Their ’Nouveau’ line, displayed during the event, features textiles made of organic, natural, and synthetic fibers coloured with a range of natural dyes. Lawrence Lambert, a co-founder of the eco-friendly studio, highlighted the importance of sustainable and ethical fashion practices.  

“[The] clothing industry is the second-most polluting industry in the world.” Lambert said. “[Designers] should see [sustainability] as a creative opportunity.” 

When asked what motivates the brand’s eco-friendly practices, Lambert mentioned that her design choices are influenced by her passion to make change. 

“[Sustainability] nurtures my inner self [by contributing to] something that’s bigger than me,” Lambert said. 

Eliza Faulkner, a Canadian fashion designer based in Montreal, also displayed some of her latest designs. Her clothing lines incorporate ultra-feminine dresses and bold use of colour. Faulkner always seeks to be more sustainable in the design and manufacturing processes.

“It’s just about making really beautiful clothes that happen to be ethically made,” Faulkner said of her clothing range. “We try to use as many sustainable practices as we can. We manufacture everything in Montreal […] [and] buy a lot of deadstock fabric [and] natural fibres.” 

Another unique vendor featured was the up-and-coming resale app Upcycli. This start up, co-founded by Elodie Lourimi and Christopher Montoya, is the first mobile app in Quebec dedicated entirely to the purchase, sale, and “upcycling” of second-hand clothing. Upcycling fashion involves using pre-existing clothing, accessories or other items and transforming them into new garments.

“We launched the app because we want to help people buy [fewer new] clothes,” Christopher Montoya, one of Upcycli’s co-founders, said. “We want to reduce [fast fashion] [and], we want to give a second life to our clothes.

Although Upcycli only operates in Quebec for now, Montaya assured that they hope to expand into other provinces across Canada. 

The vendor pop-ups were joined by numerous workshops centred on eco-friendly practices, including stations dedicated to paper-making with recycled fabrics and linen paper spinning. One workshop was led by Mariane Laforest, founder of textile studio Atelier 1n, which offers workshops and creative classes to those interested in learning about natural dyeing and textile design. 

“Natural dye[s] are better for the environment because there [are] no chemical products [left] in the water after,” Laforest said.  

However, this natural dyeing process can also have negative environmental repercussions. 

“Natural dye can also be a problem for the environment because you need to use a lot of water with natural dye” Laforest said.

This unique event was successful in promoting sustainability as an ethical and creative opportunity for designers, as well as inspiring people to search for eco-friendly options when making style choices.  

Photo of senate room
McGill, News

Senate discusses free speech and naming policies

McGill’s Senate convened for the third time this academic year on Nov. 20 to discuss the lack of policies in place for screening external organizations that use McGill facilities, the naming of university assets, and the future of international diversity on campus.  

Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) University Affairs Madeline Wilson confronted Provost and Vice-Principal (Academic) Christopher Manfredi about the university’s attitude towards external organizations being permitted to utilize McGill facilities. McGill currently has no official policy to screen organizations seeking to use university venues. Wilson expressed concern that members of the community may feel offended or denigrated by the presence of certain organizations or individuals on campus.

In response to a question by Wilson, Manfredi defended the right for free speech, even when it may offend certain students.

“McGill’s recognition of the rights of individuals and groups to express views that may be perceived by some as [harmful] or offensive does not derogate from its overarching commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion on our campus,” Manfredi said. “It would be very dangerous for the university to try to implement a policy that put prior restraint on freedom of expression, academic freedom, and the very purpose of the university.” 

The Senate also discussed the future of international diversity at McGill. Senators expressed concerns about a lack of funding for international research projects and the need to further promote McGill globally. Arts Senator Henrique Mecabô addressed the recent increase in international student tuition, which have posed a financial challenge for some students, and questioned how the university plans to attract top international talent given the additional financial barriers. The administration responded that they are trying the best they can to ensure accessibility for international students despite recent cuts in government funding.

Vice-Principal of University Advancement Marc Weinstein concluded the meeting by presenting proposed revisions to the university’s policy for the naming of assets, including buildings, and scholarships. The urgency for a revised policy was heightened by the launch of the “Made by McGill” campaign, creating the expectation of many large donations, each with a naming opportunity.  The new policy clearly outlines the protocol for naming assets and is based on the policies of other North American academic institutions. Senators were concerned that naming assets after individuals with poor reputations would reflect badly on the university.

“We use due diligence when naming assets […] to make sure that the individual has a ‘clean bill of health,’ if I can put it that way,” Weinstein said.

Soundbite: 

“I think that the reason why, at this university, we keep asking this question about international tuition is because, at least in my perspective as a student and speaking for myself, I felt that the administration is a bit tone-deaf when talking about this. All we hear is McGill is getting more money but there is never really a recognition of the fact that it is costing students more money.” Senator Madeline Wilson, SSMU VP University Affairs

Flashback: 

Principal Vice-Chancellor Suzanne Fortier stated that the university has reached out to all 22 McGill students currently on exchange in Hong Kong and ensured that they are safe amit widespread political unrest in the area. Some students have decided to stay in Hong Kong, while others are returning to Montreal. Fortier also assured that McGill is maintaining regular contact with their host institutions.

McGill, News

A conversation about sexual violence against Indigenous peoples

As a part of Quebec Public Interest Research Group’s (QPIRG) Culture Shock 2019, the Sexual Assault Center of the McGill Students’ Society (SACOMSS) collaborated with the group to host a panel discussion on Nov. 23 about the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG). The activists also discussed the intersection between anti-colonialism and sexual violence against Indigenous communities. 

Palm Springs Cahuilla educator Isabel Vasquez explained that her path to educating the public about issues facing Indigenous peoples began after her and her family personally experienced sexual violence and abduction. She also explained how invisibility perpetuates the violence that many Indigenous peoples face in North America.

“In my family in particular, [in] every generation there’s been somebody [who has] gone missing, or had an attempt on their life, or [had] been [human] trafficked,” Vasquez said. “One of the greatest contributing factors to the rates of violence against Indigenous people is the way that we are left out of society’s collective consciousness in colonial countries.”

Judy Sackaney, a Mushkegowuk Cree from Albany First Nation on Treaty 9 territory, stated that the stigma around sexual violence and alcoholism persists in Indigenous communities. 

“I didn’t learn the history, or hear people’s stories, [until] I was much older,” Sackaney said. “[I didn’t hear] about sexual violence [that occurred to people] close to me [….] I didn’t know then, maybe because I was a kid then myself.”

Sackney emphasized the importance of finding spiritual ways to heal from the trauma of sexual violence. 

“We don’t let it define us, because it wasn’t our fault,” Sackney said.  “It wasn’t anybody’s fault. [….] We use our tools, our ceremonies, our ways of healing, even praying [to cope]. I’ve grown so much spiritually [from] learning the ceremonies.”

Vasquez acknowledged that the traumatic nature of these experiences, and their ongoing connections to settler-colonialism, make them difficult to share when educating the public about  Indigenous peoples’ experiences. 

“It is very hard to share these very personal stories and perspectives,” Vasquez said. “When we’re talking about history and consistent instances of abduction, sexual abuse, [and the] trafficking of Indigenous people, we’re talking about something that isn’t just random [….] This is a history that is deliberate.”

Vasquez explained that non-Indigenous people have a responsibility to act as allies by raising awareness within their own communities.

“People who are non-Indigenous […] need to talk to each other about how they perceive Indigenous people,” Vasquez said. “When you hear these [misconceptions], I want you to think about why this is the reality that we are all accepting [….] This isn’t just our work to do.”

During the question period at the end of the panel, an audience member addressed that The Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls did not acknowledge many incidences of police violence against Indigenous peoples. Panelist Dayna Danger, a visual artist, organizer, and drummer, responded that, for Indigenous communities, relationships with police remain fraught.

“As much as we want to say ‘fuck the police,’ […] there is work that needs to be done because we still have to address these systems,” Danger said. “We’re still in this society. We can’t really escape that at the moment. People are still earnestly trying to find their family members, but unfortunately, the response [from the police] has not been great.”

Touching upon Indigenous attitudes toward the Montreal police specifically, Danger commented that Indigenous people often have to do the work of law enforcement themselves. 

“I think that there is good work that is happening,” Danger said. “But I’d be [hard] pressed to find an Indigenous person who really waits for the police to catch up [with Indigenous community organizing] at this point. This is still work that needs to be done.”

The panel concluded with Danger leading the audience in the ‘Strong Woman,’ a traditional song that many Indigenous communities have used to raise awareness about missing and murdered Indigenous women, which has modified lyrics for each community. A fourth panellist, Kiki Harper, an Indigenous two-spirit person who creates music, joined in the performance.

News, The Tribune Explains

Tribune Explains: The new Société de Transport de Montréal (STM) card readers

Students may have noticed the installation of new card readers in Société de transport de Montréal (STM) buses in recent months. On June 27, the company announced the introduction of enhanced card readers in its vehicles to replace existing ones. The new system will decrease the time it takes to board the bus, while noticeably changing some aspects of its process for customers. The McGill Tribune spoke with the STM about their goals and anticipated timeline for installation. 

What is the purpose of the new readers?

Faster boarding and increased accessibility are among the benefits of the new system. 

The readers will be used to ensure passengers have sufficient funds on their OPUS and L’Occasionnelle fare cards. They are designed to be more efficient than the existing readers, incorporated into fare collection boxes by reading cards twice as fast. The STM anticipates the technological infrastructure to allow for payment with bank cards in the future, which transportation systems in major cities, including London and New York City, have already begun adopting.

STM Public Affairs Advisor Philippe Déry, explained that the new readers are expected to enhance the experience for passengers. 

“Existing card readers were at the end of their life cycle, and thus, the STM seized the opportunity to improve its customers’ experiences by installing new, more efficient readers,” Déry wrote in an email to The McGill Tribune. “[These] will speed up boarding and allow the transition towards new technologies.”

Renovations to the design of the new system will also improve accessibility from the previous readers. 

“Universal accessibility will be enhanced through a larger and clearer screen, improved function, and an optimized location,” Déry wrote. 

What is the timeline for the project?

The project will involve three major phases: Installation, gradual activation, and eventual service across the whole STM network. Installation of the readers began in May 2019 and will continue until Nov. 2020. On standard buses, a single reader is installed at the front of the vehicle, and on extended buses, another two are stationed at the back. In Spring 2020, the readers will continue to be activated, after the software’s proper functioning is confirmed. All readers are expected to be put into service by Nov. 2020.

“The roll-out is going quite well [and] according to our plans,” Déry wrote. 

Will this encourage public transportation use? 

The activation of the new readers will still allow passengers to enter through the rear doors of the bus; however, if paying with cash or on a magnetic strip card, passengers will be required to board through the front. Although the primary purpose of the readers is to expedite boarding, confusion may slow the process at first. Enola Hihi, SSMU Sustainability Commissioner, believes the changes to the boarding process may discourage new riders. 

“A problem I foresee is an initial confusion, which may hold up lines and deter people wanting to try public transportation for the first time,” Hihi said. “I don’t think this is a bad project, [but] I don’t see the point of investing so much money into it, when the money could be [put] to the [improvement] of bus routes, or possibly buying electric buses.” 

On the other hand, Déry predicts that the combined projects of the STM will increase its user base.“This project aims to improve customer service, and it is an added benefit if it encourages more people to take public transit,” Déry said. “In the long term, the addition of other payment options, like bank cards, could facilitate a more spontaneous use of our network.”

Editorial, Opinion

The Wellness Hub needs more than a makeover

Only four months after its official opening, the Student Wellness Hub has received frustrated criticisms, including a recent tweet by a student expressing disappointment about having his appointment rescheduled despite waiting over 80 days to meet with a therapist. Even after receiving a $14 million donation for the Hub, McGill has failed to resolve many of the accessibility issues students have been lamenting for years, such as long waitlists caused by an acute lack of clinical professionals.

Mental health on university campuses is an increasingly important issue that the Hub has aimed to address. In Quebec, one in five students needs treatment for depression. According to Dr. Vera Romano, director of the Wellness Hub, the Hub’s aim was to centralize healthcare services in pursuit of establishing holistic, accessible care. Since Sept. 2019, the Hub has added three psychiatrists, six general practitioners, and three nurses, as well as 11 Local Wellness Advisor for various faculties. Additionally, the Hub also plans to co-purchase off-campus counselling services and implement an online booking system. 

Despite these additions, the continued shortage of counsellors and daunting wait times have left students dismayed. Students are also frustrated to see costly aesthetic improvements to the building while waitlists and treatments remain unchanged. These superficial renovations are another instance of McGill prioritizing appearances over student wellbeing, a trend that has been especially criticized in light of the recent “Made by McGill” campaign. Despite claiming to do its best to build incredible students, McGill has a recurring pattern of striving to maintain its prestigious image while ignoring students’ demands for change.

Other similar-sized universities in North America have taken much larger strides towards accessible healthcare. When faced with a similarly overburdened healthcare system, Harvard University created a same-day drop-in program to reduce wait times. The University of Calgary is attempting to receive some burden off on its healthcare system by removing the need for medical notes to excuse absences; no such policy currently exists at McGill. 

McGill’s overall approach to mental health is lacking. Starting in Fall 2019, the university removed its long term therapy program: Instead, the Wellness Hub focuses on short-term solutions and immediate prevention. The Hub’s approach is astoundingly out of touch with the realities of students living with mental health issues. Mental health issues can very rarely be adequately treated with short-term care, and the Wellness Hub must confront this reality by offering long-term support. Improving support may also mean offering Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) to students who need it, an option that the Wellness Hub currently does not provide. Wellness advisors can be useful, however, they cannot replace the need for professional psychologists and psychiatrists. 

McGill should consider partnering with more local clinics to fill their gaps in service. Having more partner organizations would increase the availability of specific treatment types for different student needs like eating disorder recovery or CBT. In addition, racialized, 2LGBTQiA+, and other marginalized students require therapists who understand their realities, and even reflect their intersecting identities. White, straight, cis-gendered, or male therapists cannot relate to the experiences of marginalized students, and this may hinder their ability to provide adequate treatment. It is incumbent on mental health services to hire and offer treatment by professionals with diverse backgrounds and identities.

Beyond improvements to the Hub, McGill can take other steps to be more accommodating of those affected by mental illness. For example, if McGill wants to prioritize wellness, the university should start by implementing a Fall Reading Week and increasing the amount of available academic advisors. Additionally, McGill should follow the University of Calgary’s example and abandon sick notes as well to remove the burden from healthcare services, and to allow students to take time off more easily. Other measures to prioritize accessibility, such as eliminating pop-quizzes, offering lecture recordings for all courses, and instituting flexible deadlines will help students balance their mental health with their lectures and homework. 

The Wellness Hub would not deserve so much criticism if it were not for McGill’s consistent failure to listen to students’ concerns. Students struggling with their mental health must be recognized as authorities on their own needs, and their suggestions for improvements should be heeded by McGill.

Student Life, The Tribune Tries

A candid cannabis conversation

Over a year after the national legalization of cannabis, Quebec is raising the legal age to 21, a decision poised to directly impact students. On Nov. 20, Voxcann, a cannabis education initiative by the nonprofit Groupe de recherche et d’intervention psychosociale (GRIP), and the Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy’s (CSSDP) Concordia and McGill chapters collaborated to host a cannabis roundtable at the Concordia Art Hive. The event aimed to promote candid conversation about student cannabis use from a medical and social standpoint. A mix of Concordia and McGill students discussed their experiences with cannabis, the changes brought about by legalization, and upcoming reforms to legislation.

The roundtable was a natural partnership between Voxcann and CSSDP. Coco Wang, the director of development for Voxcann, explained the group’s mission.

“Our focus is […] youth empowerment [on] the topic of cannabis education and policy, because that’s what we at Voxcann think is lacking in the current [cannabis scene].” Wang said. 

Similarly, CSSDP’s McGill chapter aims to give voice to student concerns about national drug policy.

“Our goal is to mobilize young people to participate in the political process at all levels [to advocate] for sensible drug policies that aim to reduce harm and […] reflect […] research,” Gabriel Aboutoul, a CSSDP representative, said. 

 Both groups focus on harm reduction and approaching drug use as an issue of public health and human rights rather than criminal justice.

Discussion first turned to where students get information about cannabis, and whether that information is likely to be accurate. Many participants got their information anecdotally and discussed the inherent limitations to this lack of objectivity. One participant discussed their work at the Société québécoise du cannabis (SQDC) and the restrictions on what information vendors can disclose to customers. 

Legalization has paved the way for more accessible information about the technicalities of cannabis. For example, it has facilitated emerging research about the psychoactive effects of different terpenes, the scent compounds in cannabis that define certain strains.

The conversation then turned to the positive and negative effects of cannabis use. Though for some people, weed can alleviate symptoms of mental illness with fewer side effects than medication, while it can exacerbate these issues in others. Despite this, legalization has allowed these individuals to try cannabis in a more controlled environment and learn how it affects them through experience. 

The group also discussed the degree to which cannabis has changed post-legalization. The roundtable recognized the intersections of racial and class privilege. For those in positions of privilege, weed use has always been safer, given the disproportionate rates of cannabis-related incarceration in poor, homeless, and racialized youth, specifically young black men. 

Finally, the facilitator highlighted the changes in cannabis legislation that will take effect in 2020. In late October, the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government passed a law that will raise the legal age to purchase cannabis within the province from 18 to 21. The change in legislation aims to protect teenagers, a group that lawmakers fear is especially vulnerable to dependency. However, opponents contend that the legislation is both unfair and potentially harmful, since it creates a second class of adults aged 18 to 21 who will likely resort to illegal methods of obtaining cannabis. 

The roundtable agreed that these changes are both confusing, given that the legal age to purchase alcohol will remain 18, and harmful to those who had access to legal cannabis granted and quickly revoked. Though the change is likely due to concerns about stunting brain development, the table concluded that the decision to revoke a right that had already been granted and that in fact promoted safer use, was a misstep. By re-criminalizing use that will likely continue after the change, the Quebec government could endanger teens who will naturally seek to experiment.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue