Latest News

Sports

Quidditch for the ages

On Sept. 29, McGill and Université de Montreal co-hosted the annual season-opening Vive le Quidditch Libre tournament in Montreal’s Parc Villeray. It was a less-than-ideal start to the year for McGill’s two quidditch teams: McA and Canada’s Finest Quidditch Club (CFQC) placed fifth and seventh, respectively, in a pool of seven teams. Nevertheless, the McGill teams remain optimistic about the rest of their seasons.

Quidditch, the brainchild of Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, is a fictional sport that is popular within the wizarding world of her bestselling series. Each team fields a side of seven players. They fly around the pitch on broomsticks, throwing a ball, or ‘quaffle’, through a set of giant rings to score points. They also try to avoid being hit by smaller, rock-hard balls called ‘bludgers.’ One member on each team, known as a ‘seeker,’ chases a small, golden ball called a ‘snitch.’ The game ends immediately once the snitch has been caught.

Within the past decade, this fictional hobby has become a reality: Groups across the globe have organized quidditch leagues, and the real-world game has adopted its own unique charm. This version, however, does not involve any flying. Instead, players run with narrow pipes between their legs, and the golden snitch is a specially-trained person dressed in gold with a tennis ball hanging from their pants, paid $10 per game to avoid getting caught by seekers. The players known as ‘beaters’ run around and pelt their opponents with dodgeballs instead of bludgers.

“I think people take it as a joke sport and just kind of laugh,” McGill Quidditch Team Captain Caitlin Belz said. “I consider quidditch to be just as much of a strategic and athletic sport as any other.”

This season is a special one for McGill Quidditch, as it celebrates its 10th anniversary. As far as university quidditch is concerned, McGill is a pioneer. Ever since Canada’s first official club was first formed on campus, the sport’s popularity has spiked.

“We started by playing in the U.S., and then there was a Canadian league,” McGill Quidditch VP Communications Brooklynn Carey said. 

In fact, the game has grown beyond the university level; two of the teams participating in this tournament were made up entirely of alumni who wanted to stay in the sport.

Participants don’t have to be fans of Harry Potter to get into the sport.

“Not as many people as you would think are fans,” Belz said. “The ratio of fans to non-fans is about 65-35, but we always have a few people on the team that have never read the books or seen the movies, and that number is increasing.”

Around 150 people participated in tryouts this season. Two big pulls for the sport are that quidditch is gender-inclusive, one of very few played at the university level, and that it provides exercise without requiring much athleticism. Often, varsity athletes will play quidditch in the offseason to stay in shape. One such athlete is Ashley Blackburn Ouellette, a former hockey player who got into quidditch after finding the club on campus.

“For an athlete, it [is] a really great sport,” Ouellette said. “I actually fell in love with the sport really fast.”

Though the opening tournament was a bit of a disappointment for McGill Quidditch fans, the season is still young. With such an important anniversary to honour, hopefully McGill Quidditch can make this season a magical one.

A previous version of this article stated that Brooklynn Carey was the VP Internal of the McGill Quidditch team. In fact, she is the VP Communications. The Tribune regrets this error.

Letter to the Editor: No, there is no “quest for monolingual domination” in Québec
Letters to the Editor, Opinion

Letter to the Editor: There is no “quest for monolingual domination” in Québec

On Sept. 18, The McGill Tribune published an opinion piece titled “Quebec’s quest for monolingual domination makes healthcare less accessible.” In this article, the author made dubious and confusing links between Bill 10, font changes on information signs at Saint Mary’s hospital, and what he described as “Quebec’s quest for monolingual domination.” We, the Francophone newspaper Le Délit, and the Organisation de la Francophonie à McGill, seek to react and set the record straight lest such an ill-advised and anecdotal opinion piece cultivate confusion and intolerance among the McGill community.

In 2015, the Québec government passed Bill 10: “An Act to modify the organization and governance of the health and social services network, in particular by abolishing the regional agencies.” Bill 10 is part of a vast reform of the healthcare system engineered by the Parti libéral du Québec (PLQ)―elected with stellar majorities in Anglophone ridings like Notre-Dame-de-Grâce (NDG), in which the Saint-Mary’s hospital is located.

Ironically, the PLQ invoked closure, bâillon, to pass Bill 10 and muffle the Parti québécois and Québec solidaire’s opposition to the dismantling of regional agencies. If anglophone communities are indeed worried about the loss of local agencies, this concern is shared by many Francophones. The removal of some local anglophone agencies and the ensuing disorganization of services are consequences of Bill 10, not its purpose.

The constituency of NDG, nonetheless, stands in good posture to voice its concern since Kathleen Weil, minister in charge of the relations with English-speaking Québécois, is currently running for reelection in this same riding.

It is also worth noting that anglophone communities were invited in parliamentary committee before Bill 10 was tabled. Addressing the issue of access to services in English, Article 76 of the bill states that “Each public institution must, in the centres it specifies, develop a program of access to English-language health services and social services for the English-speaking population it serves.”

In fact, no one voiced the alleged determination to make French predominant during debates on the bill at the National Assembly. Purporting that Bill 10 was driven by Québec’s intent of monolinguistic domination is at best ridiculous, if not completely misleading.

Referring to changes in the font size of signs at Saint-Mary’s hospital, the author contends that “legislation like Bill 10 is not only detrimental to [students’] security but is attempting to address an imagined decline in the French linguistic tradition.” We can but call this a misinformed and twisted reading of reality.

How can one pretend to understand the language question in Québec while grounding their analysis in a study that looks at it from a purely market-based perspective, where historical and cultural dimensions have been evacuated? A diagnosis of the state of the French language can not rest solely on a supply and demand analysis. The question is, obviously, more complex than this.

Moreover, the author’s diagnosis of an “imagined” French decline is problematic, as it relies on numbers about Québec residents’ self-assessed ability to sustain a conversation in French. This is not very telling.  Meanwhile, the proportion of Québécois whose first language is French and the number of Québécois speaking French at home are both declining. Another recent study designed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development suggests that almost half of Québécois are functional illiterates. “French is on the rise”—really?

If the author of this opinion piece truly feels concerned by the respect and dynamism of Québec’s linguistic culture, then the impact of his words should probably be weighed more carefully. Changing the signs’ font resulted from an administrative decision; to portray that change as a national “quest for monolingual domination” is dishonest and disrespectful toward Québécois. This sort of presumption can have dangerous consequences, as it fuels confusion and pits communities against each other.

By the way, Montréal is indeed a cosmopolitan city, but it is also part of Québec. And here, French is not just a mere “linguistic tradition”: It is our official language and the basis of our identity.

 

Antoine Milette-Gagnon and Simon Tardif are Editors at Le Délit, and Christophe Savoie-Côté is the President of L’Organisation de la Francophonie à McGill.

Science & Technology

What is divestment?

On Sept. 12, the McGill Senate voted to support divestment from fossil fuels. While the term ‘divestment’ is ubiquitous on McGill’s campus, its meaning and implications remain foggy to many.

To maintain financial stability, the Senate reports that McGill invests part of its $1.6 billion endowment into fossil fuel firms. Divestment, as it pertains to fossil fuels at McGill, is the act of selling stocks in companies that make profit off of fossil fuels to convey the institution’s social and environmental responsibility.

Scientists almost unanimously agree that fossil fuels are the main cause of global warming. Fossil fuels are burned for energy, which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. As a greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide molecules trap heat from the sun in Earth’s atmosphere much like the walls of a greenhouse retain heat. As a result of an increased consumption of fossil fuels to power everyday life, the Earth has become almost 1ºC warmer since the last century.

Nature Magazine predicts that increases in temperature could lead to environmental catastrophes, such as the extinction of up 15-37 per cent of species by 2050 if no action is taken. One-hundred ninety-five countries signed the 2015 Paris Agreement—with the United States as a notable exception—agreeing to undertake ambitious efforts to prevent further rises in global temperatures; this requires keeping CO2 emissions from 2000 to 2050 under 886 billion tons.

Divestment proponents argue that since fossil fuel companies have not agreed to meet the necessary emission cap, supporting them through investment is socially irresponsible.

“McGill has an ethical obligation to not only reduce our own role as consumers of fossil fuel[s] by implementing and improving upon our commitment to carbon neutrality, but also end our role as producers of such fuel by divesting,” Associate Professor Gregory Mikkelson in the McGill School of Environment and the Department of Philosophy, said.

Yet, in the debate on divestment, one counterargument is that divesting alone does not harm the targeted firms unless it is implemented on a massive scale. Fossil fuel companies are worth hundreds of billions of dollars; for them, McGill’s small investment is a negligible sum. If McGill were to divest, the sold shares could simply be acquired by someone else. Moreover, the value of fossil fuel companies does not actually depend on the amount of money invested by shareholders.

“Those companies, their market value comes from the fact that there is an underlying global demand for what it is they do,” Christopher Ragan, an associate professor in  the Department of Economics, said. “As long as the world is interested in buying oil, then […] there is a value to what those companies are doing.”

While divestment might not affect fossil fuel firms, it certainly would influence McGill’s own financial standing. Adding a restriction to McGill’s financial portfolio would make it more difficult to maintain financial stability. Still, there exist alternative, greener investments, which may even be more profitable than fossil fuels.

According to Dror Etzion, associate professor in the Faculty of Management, fossil fuels cost McGill $40 million between 2012 and 2015. This is not too abnormal, as the value of fossil fuel commodities fluctuate cyclically between periods of high and low growth throughout the year. It is, therefore, hard to predict the future potential of fossil fuel shares and judge the full financial effect divestment may have on McGill.

While the environmental and financial effects of divestment remain hazy, one thing is certain: McGill’s divestment would hold great symbolic significance.

“When the alma mater of the Canadian prime minister divests from fossil fuel[s], it will send a powerful signal”, Mikkelson said.

Out on the Town, Student Life

The radical history of Milton-Parc

Fifty years ago, real estate developers Concordia Estates Ltd. purchased the majority of the historic buildings that make up the Milton-Parc neighbourhood with the intention of clearing them out to make way for new shopping, hotel, and apartment developments. Angered by this encroachment, a group of local activists protested the construction, claiming it would destroy the character of the community and leave long-time residents without homes. The Canadian Centre for Architecture’s exhibition, “Milton-Parc: How we did it” runs until Feb. 17 and spotlights the neighbourhood’s rich history. On Sept. 27, a panel also titled “Milton-Parc: How we did it” featuring the movement’s organizers accompanied the display.

The Milton-Parc neighbourhood, known by students as the ‘McGill ghetto,’ spans six square blocks, bounded by Hutchison, Ste. Famille, Milton, and Pine Ave. Dimitri Roussopoulos, a curator and the first speaker at the Sept. 27 event, emphasized activism in the neighbourhood as an example of citizen involvement. He also participated in the planning stages of the Milton-Parc protests.

Roussopoulos’ presentation centred around the Committee’s landmark demonstration in May 1972, which protested Concordia Estates Ltd.’s plan to build high-rise, high-rent housing in the neighbourhood. Students can recognize LaCité, the first step in this project of urban ‘renewal’ and the only part of the plan that was actually completed, as the antithesis to the charming, low-rise feel of its surrounding area. Addressing the audience, Roussopoulos paid homage to the historic protest while rallying the audience around the Committee’s ongoing advocacy.

“Milton-Parc is on a land trust, and it is radical [in itself] to have a land trust,” Roussopoulos said. “[It is] contrary to market capitalism […] that [to this day] there is no buying and selling of property in the six block radius. […] We won, and we’re still fighting.”

Activists took to the microphone to recount their roles in the movement. Among them was Henry Milner, who was one of the first to be arrested after the 1972 demonstration. Milner recounted that, during the protest, activists occupied the Concordia Estates Ltd. offices and were jailed for ‘public mischief,’ before the charges were dropped. Milner emphasized the Milton-Parc protest as a catalyst for municipal change movements across Montreal: The ‘70s activism in Milton-Parc was, as many of the speakers point out, part of an international movement.

“[The activism in Milton-Parc] represented the idea of thinking globally and acting locally,” Milner said. “Our generation had a mission to keep neighbourhoods going.”

The accompanying photography exposition reflected a sense of reverence for the activism of years past in a slideshow of black-and-white images of protests and the neighbourhood’s history. McGill alumni Clara Gutsche and David Miller took photos of the Milton-Parc community  for the Citizens’ Committee, which served as background entertainment during the event. These photographs, many of which are also displayed in the hallway cases, both kept visual records of the movement and showed the neighbourhood’s charm in contrast with the stark, modernist aesthetic of the proposed new developments.

This year, on the 35th anniversary of Communauté Milton-Parc (CMP) and the 50th anniversary of the Milton-Parc Citizens’ Committee (MPCC), the legacy of this historic neighbourhood and the activists who fought to preserve it are more important than ever. Still devoted to preserving the community, MPCC seeks to take possession of the defunct Hôtel-Dieu Hospital for social housing, community, and cultural spaces. Alanna Dow, current president of CMP, also mentioned that the community was looking at vacant parking lots as possible co-ops for aging Milton-Parc residents. In an interview with The McGill Tribune, Roussopoulos again emphasized that through this work, the group continues to preserve Milton-Parc’s unique character.

“The Milton-Parc project is a six-block downtown land trust on which there are 22 nonprofit housing co-ops and 1500 people in residence,” Roussopoulos said. “All land is owned in common. It is a significant piece of real estate [with a significant history.] […] It is the largest housing project in North America, and not enough Montrealers know this. […] This kind of community project should be replicated in other parts of Montreal.”

Science & Technology

EpiPen shortage leaves those with life-threatening allergies scrambling

Earlier this year, Pfizer Canada, the pharmaceutical giant behind EpiPens, reported a shortage in both the 0.3 and 0.15-milligram versions of the drug. As the country’s only brand of life-saving epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs), Pfizer’s announcement sent Health Canada scrambling for solutions as the shortage is predicted to persist into next year.

EAIs are used to deliver a fast dose of epinephrine—also called adrenaline—to someone experiencing a severe allergic reaction. This includes anaphylaxis, the most severe allergic reaction, which can ultimately lead to death. According to a report by the Canadian Institute for Health Information, allergic reactions make up one per cent of all emergency room visits every year.

Pfizer Canada issued a statement in April, attributing the shortage to “delays at the manufacturing facility and limited third-party quantities of a component for the product.”

When The McGill Tribune reached out for comment, Pfizer Canada’s media relations team could not provide further details about the delay or the parties responsible.

This is not the first time Pfizer’s EpiPen monopoly has come under fire. One of Pfizer’s companies, Meridian Medical Technologies (MMT), received a warning letter from the United States’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2017. The letter outlined MMT’s poor quality control and its failure to thoroughly investigate customer complaints and product defects.

“Your […] data shows that you received hundreds of complaints that your EpiPen products failed to operate during life-threatening emergencies, including some situations in which patients subsequently died,” the letter from the FDA read.

In the same correspondence with the Tribune, Pfizer Canada admitted that it had seen “some impact on manufacturing capacity” as a result of the FDA warning.

A shortage of EpiPens doesn’t just mean a manufacturing hassle for Pfizer; this crisis has extreme consequences for many people. A mother in rural Ontario, for example, was reluctant to use her son’s EpiPen during her own severe allergic reaction for fear that it would leave her son—who also suffers from life-threatening allergies—vulnerable during the shortage.

According to a country-wide study conducted by allergy and immunology specialist Moshe Ben-Shoshan and his colleagues at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), less than half of patients actually use their EpiPens during anaphylaxis before arriving at the emergency room, often because they are unaware of the severity of their reaction. Even more surprisingly, these statistics were taken before the shortage was announced.

In response to the crisis, Health Canada made an announcement that those who are vulnerable should keep their old EpiPens if they can’t get a new one. However, hoarding EpiPens is only a temporary solution, as they have a relatively short shelf-life of approximately 18 months.

“[An] expired EpiPen will also be effective, although less potent,” Ben-Shoshan said to the Tribune.

As well as encouraging the use of expired EpiPens to meet the demand, the Minister of Health has recently signed a temporary agreement to allow the distribution of AUVI-Q, an EpiPen alternative. Produced by the drug company Kaléo, AUVI-Q is another adrenaline auto-injector now sold for around $170 in pharmacies across the country; they are significantly more expensive than the typical $100 price of an EpiPen.

Moreover, the eggs-in-one-basket model isn’t doing Canada any favours.

“Having different types of manufactures for an epinephrine auto-injector will help reduce the risk of such shortage,” Ben-Shoshan said.

EAIs aren’t the only drugs in low supply. Drugshortagescanada.ca, a third-party website under contract with Health Canada, provides daily updates on drug shortages and discontinuations. According to a document published on the website, drug shortages in Canada have become increasingly common in the last decade.

Drug manufacturers have both a legal and a public responsibility to prevent drug shortages, which means ensuring adequate quality assurance, risk management, and contracting back-up suppliers to guarantee the entire drug supply chain runs smoothly.

McGill, News

SUS discusses annual budget and changes to grading policies

On Sept. 26, the Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) members convened for their second annual meeting. Among the actions taken were the approval of the budget for the 2018-19 fiscal year, details new initiatives, and a brief discussion on desired changes to McGill’s satisfactory/unsatisfactory grading option. Members also discussed a Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) motion regarding member affiliation with far-right groups.

SUS Vice-President Finance Dylan Wong presented their 2018-19 fiscal year budget to the council. He explained that last year’s budget deficit hindered the planning of this year’s Science Frosh activities.

“We have enough rollover to run Frosh, but we have used up a lot of our funds in order to run Frosh to its full extent because we didn’t have as much rollover as we should have and as we have had in previous years,” Wong said.

The approved budget will generate more than $113,000 of surplus funds by cutting SUS spending and making use of revenue from this year’s Frosh, which exceeded expectations. According to Wong, this will allow for flexibility when planning Frosh next year.  

SSMU representatives also presented their motions and expressed concern about the Motion to Adopt a Policy Against Affiliation with Far-Right Groups, which the SSMU Legislative Council debated the next day. Ultimately though, the SSMU Council postponed making a decision on the matter.

“The definition [of ‘far-right’] laid out there […] is very vague and very broad,” Science Representative to SSMU Moses Milchberg said. “Under the definition as it stands […], people could potentially make the case that [Conservative McGill] is a far-right organization because of an individual they associate with.”

The definition of “far-right” in the motion is currently taken from RationalWiki, a volunteer-based nonprofit that claims to ‘ fight pseudoscience.’ The motion seeks to deny SSMU membership to clubs associated with far-right groups, and to bar members of far-right groups from running for SSMU offices.

In addition, SUS executives sought input regarding the possibility of modifying the satisfactory/unsatisfactory (S/U), or ‘pass/fail,’ grading option. The S/U option allows students to obtain credit for a course if their grades are satisfactory without having a letter grade affecting their GPA or appearing on their transcripts. Under the current rules, the grading option for a course cannot be changed after the add-drop deadline has passed.

The primary proposed change is to extend the deadline to switch back from S/U to regular grading. Representatives were asked to present their suggestions at the next Council meeting.

“Nothing was set in stone yet,” Vice-President (Academic) Michael Ogundeji said. “[The faculty] just really wanted to know what we think about it and potential problems that can arise from it.”

SUS President Reem Mandil clarified that the faculty administration would not permit students to take more than one S/U course per semester or change regular courses to S/U after add-drop.

Finally, SUS executives announced a series of upcoming events such as an SUS pancake breakfast on Oct. 12 at 9 a.m. around the SUS office area at which Science students will have the opportunity to socialize and meet the SUS executive team.

In addition, Science students interested in attending graduate school were encouraged to register for the McGill Science Grad Fair at New Residence Hall on Nov. 6.

Vice-President Internal Zlata Plotnikova announced the creation of a ‘Department of the Year’ award. Each department under SUS will receive a point when one of its students attends an activity organized by the Science Internal Committee (SIC). The award will go to the most-involved department.

Following the resignation of former VP external Michelle Guo, the executives also announced a by-election to fill the position.  

Ask Ainsley, Student Life

Ask Ainsley: How can I balance my academic and personal life?

Dear Ainsley,

I am new to McGill and trying to find time to keep up with my studies, but it is hard because there are so many activities and extracurriculars to take part in. How do I balance life at university so that I can join clubs, hang out with my new friends, and still stay on top of my school work? Is this all even possible?

Sincerely,

Trying to Survive (TTS)

____________________________________________________________________________

Dear TTS,

This is a question so many students struggle with during their time at university. Students often lament that they only have enough time in the day to pick two of three options: Getting enough sleep, achieving good grades, or enjoying a full social life. While this scarcity of time is understandably difficult to handle, there are ways in which students can, in fact, “have it all.”

Though finding a balance between so many priorities can be exhausting, staying organized can help in achieving this balance. Make schedules and to-do lists your best friends. Schedules are great for keeping track of upcoming deadlines and what daily free time you might have, so you can see when and where to squeeze in some homework or friend time. If you don’t know what your obligations are, keep an updated list of the tasks you would like to accomplish with you at all times, whether it be in a notebook or on your phone. Careful planning makes filling in those schedule gaps a bit easier throughout the day. While you may think that you can keep all of those nitty-gritty reminders in your head, it’s helpful to free up that brain space and leave them on a calendar. Visualizing those details can also uncover time for some well-deserved social time or sleep.

You can also create more space in the day by making your study time count. Often, students will try to enjoy the best of both worlds by taking company to the library, but this can distract you from hitting the books. In this case, it could be beneficial to compartmentalize, either focusing on school during the day and friends at night, or school during the week and friends on the weekend. Talk it over with your friends in order to sync your academic and social schedules. While studying, there are also plenty of tricks to reduce procrastination and finish work more quickly and effectively. For example, having a “power hour” would allow you to study free of social media for one hour, and afterward allot yourself some time for a real break.

Lastly, when trying to manage university life, don’t underestimate the power of a good night’s rest. Many students will prioritize their academic and social lives and, consequently, neglect their health through sleep deprivation. If this is the case for you, find a night where you can free up time and go to bed early. Otherwise, utilize the power of a nap. While a nap may not give you the extra two hours of sleep you’ve been searching for, it can give you an extra boost to power through the remainder of your day. Studies have shown that even a 10-minute nap can be sufficient to overcome a poor night’s rest. Of course, this is not a long-term solution for lack of sleep. Be sure to schedule in appropriate amounts of time for sleep so that your health is not compromised.

By practicing good habits and making use of helpful tools, balancing time for school, friends, and health becomes much more manageable.

Good luck!

Ainsley

Martlets, Sports

Martlets badminton goes 1-4 in season opener

On Sept. 28 and 29, the McGill women’s badminton team kicked off its season at Currie Gymnasium, hosting the first RSEQ competition of the year. The Martlets’ doubles and singles teams won one matchup and lost four against the five visiting Quebec universities: Université Laval, Université de Montréal (UdeM), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Université de Sherbrooke, and Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR).

Matches ran simultaneously throughout the two-day competition, with six courts set up across the gym to handle all of the action. Every school played each other team once, selecting three doubles pairs and two singles to represent them. The singles and pairs then played one match each. Total scores were decided by the number of matches each team won out of five.

During their games, McGill focused on where they placed the birdie on the court and their general shot quality.

“[We wanted to] drive [our opponents] down the court, so they [would have to] both reach to their left then cross to the other side,” first-year doubles player Linda Zhu said. “They’re both on their left side [of the court], so they can’t reach their right [….] You aim for the corners, and [then] you drive [the birdie] down hard and fast.”

On Friday night, Sept. 28, McGill fell to Laval and UQAM, both by a 5-0 score. They found more success on Saturday, however, with their first victory, taking down UQTR by a score of 3-2. Unfortunately, the win was bookended by two more losses: The Martlets dropped matchups against Sherbrooke and UdeM and finished in fifth place out of six teams with a 1-4 record. Still, second-year Team Captain Julia Tian remained optimistic for the rest of their season.

“I feel like we’re doing pretty well,” Tian said between matches on Sept. 29. “This is our first tournament of the year, so it’s always really tough starting out.”

One Martlet who made her mark on the tournament was Angcy Xiao. After Xiao sat out during Friday’s matchups, Tian put her in for Saturday’s singles games. Xiao had to transfer her support and energy from the bench to the court, and it was clear that she stepped up to the opportunity.

“[Xiao was] able to fill in her role as [the third singles player], and she’s doing a really good job,” Tian said. “I’m proud of her. She came in, she was prepared to play, and [she] was still able to do her best.”

Meanwhile, the McGill men’s badminton team also competed this weekend, Sept. 28-29, at École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS) in Montreal. They went 3-3 and finished fourth out of seven teams.

With the season’s first tournament now concluded, the Martlets will head back into the gym in preparation for their next tournament, hosted by UQTR on Oct. 27 and 28.

 

McGill, News

Special Investigator appointed to combat sexual violence

In an email addressed to members of the McGill community on Sept. 11, Provost Christopher Manfredi announced the appointment of Maître Caroline Lemay, an experienced lawyer, mediator, and ombudsperson, to the role of Special Investigator of sexual violence. In her role, Lemay will be responsible for investigating all reports of sexual violence on McGill’s campus and will be the single point of entry for all such reports. The appointment came in response to a student walkout and a Student Society of McGill University (SSMU) open letter in April 2018 that accused the McGill administration of mishandling sexual violence allegations.

 

Lemay will act independently of the McGill administration and any other disciplinary authority. The creation of her role is intended to alleviate student concerns that McGill’s internal review system is skewed against survivors.

 

Starting on Oct. 9, Lemay will lead investigations into reports of sexual violence against members of the McGill community. However, her mandate may not include reports filed before her term begins.

 

Connor Spencer, former vice-president external of SSMU, organizer of the May demonstrations, and member of Our Turn, a national organization addressing sexual violence on college and university campuses, expressed doubt about the scope of the investigation.

 

“The special investigator was a win for us, even if the role isn’t fully defined,” Spencer said. “[But] we’ve still got absolutely nothing about claims in the past.”

 

The second prong of McGill’s response to allegations of mishandled sexual violence reports is the Ad Hoc Senate Committee on Teaching Staff-Student Intimate Relationships, that will review McGill’s policy regarding relations between teaching staff and student relationships. The administration hopes that the working groups will create a comprehensive policy that will reconcile differences between the 2017 Policy on Harassment, Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Prohibited by Law and the 2016 Policy against Sexual Violence while ensuring that the policy is in accordance with Quebec’s 2017 law regarding sexual violence on university campuses, Bill 151.

 

Manfredi emphasized that the ad hoc committee would have strong student representation in his May 10 email to the McGill community. Lemay herself was appointed by recommendation from a committee containing representatives of SSMU and other members of the McGill community.

 

Associate Provost (Equity and Academic Policies) Angela Campbell stated that students from various associations and the Sexual Assault Centre of the McGill Students’ Society (SACOMSS) would be part of the working groups. These students would represent the interests and input of their respective constituencies.

 

“We will also be looking at other ways to ensure wide and meaningful input and consultation from multiple stakeholders on campus,” Campbell said.

 

The Senate ad hoc committee on Teaching Staff-Student Intimate Relationships, held a town hall on Sept. 18 open to all McGill students. Participants were invited to provide suggestions for changes to McGill’s current policy on intimate relationships between staff and students.

 

In an opinion article published by The McGill Daily, David Collins, a PhD philosophy student, along with several anonymous members of the Philosophy Students’ Association and Philosophy Graduates’ Student Association, called on the administration to outright ban any relations between staff and students. This contrasts with the current policy, which only bans relations between teachers and their own students.

 

“By banning student-teacher relationships, McGill would join a number of universities with similar bans such as Harvard, Yale, and MIT, and would bring itself in line with policies governing professionals in other fields, such as healthcare providers,” the authors wrote.

 

The review of McGill’s sexual violence policy is intended to last through the fall semester.

Album Reviews, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Cher’s ‘Dancing Queen’ divides fans

As if her lacklustre performance in this summer’s Mamma Mia 2! Here We Go Again, wasn’t enough, Cher has released an album of ABBA covers. The A&E team is here to deliver the verdict: Does Dancing Queen redeem the Goddess of Pop? Does the diva do justice to her ‘70s-disco Swedish counterparts? Take a chance on us and read on.

Kevin Vogel

Contributor

When I first started to listen, Dancing Queen seemed like an album with some fun bops that I could really get into, even if the original ABBA vocals were missing. But, the longer I listened, the wackier the album got. From robot auto tuning in “Mama Mia” to weepy opera-like singing in “Fernando,” I just couldn’t support the album’s creative decisions. Not only were the songs missing ABBA’s classic harmonies, but they failed to properly showcase Cher’s powerful voice. Sorry, Cher. You’re awesome, but I’m not impressed.

Matthew Hawkins

Contributor

Cher’s Dancing Queen is everything that Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again should have been. Despite being a diehard Cher fan, I found myself extremely disappointed by her performance in the summer sequel. Cher singing ABBA seemed like a dream come true, but  Here We Go Again does both Cher and ABBA an injustice. With Dancing Queen, however, Cher makes up for it. She takes the classic ABBA tracks, “Waterloo,” “Mamma Mia,” and of course, the titular anthem, “Dancing Queen”, and pays homage to their legacy, all while adding her own electrifying energy, iconic auto-tune, and synth beats. While the introduction to the Cher/ABBA fusion was disappointing, this album showcases the best of the hybrid.

Katia Innes

Arts & Entertainment Editor

After watching “Cher: The Unauthorized Rusical” episode of Season 10 of RuPaul’s Drag Race, I assumed that it would be the one and only time Cher would cross my mind this year. Boy, was I wrong. Her dubious appearance in Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again, the premiere of biographical musical The Cher Showin Chicago, and the release of Dancing Queen have further solidified my theory that we have reached peak Cher. Dancing Queen is the cherry on top of this Cher-shaped sundae. Give this woman a Kennedy Center Honours Prize—oh wait! They already have!

Ariella Garmaise

Managing Editor

Unlike most fans, I discovered Cher neither through her music, nor from her prolific stint as a variety show host. Rather, I stumbled across the Goddess of Pop on Twitter, where her experimental work with emojis, capitalization, and punctuation far outshines any movie or album she’s ever made. I enjoyed Dancing Queen just fine, but not nearly as much as I liked her promotional tweeting for the occasion. In less than 280 characters, she says more than “Waterloo” ever could.

 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue