Latest News

Letters to the Editor, Opinion

Letter to the Editor: SSMU’s independence should not come before student safety

by Norman Yallen on

More in Letters to the Editor:

I respectfully disagree with the Feb. 21 editorial, “McGill Administration must support independence of student societies.” Igor Sadikov advocated for violence toward Zionists, which includes Zionist students at McGill. I am a proud Arts Graduate of McGill, and I identify as a Zionist. I know many others at McGill who would say the same. Sadikov advocated violence against students that he represents, and the administration was right to speak out against it.

Igor Sadikov tweeted, “punch a zionist [sic] today,” and in doing that he called for violence against many McGill students. He has since resigned from the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Board of Directors, but remains on an Arts Undergraduate Society as a SSMU representative. The job of Arts Representative to SSMU is to represent the Faculty of Arts to the student government. Sadikov cannot do that job because he called for violence toward many of the students he supposedly represents. He cannot be allowed to represent student interests anymore.

The editorial argued that the administration imposing a course of action on SSMU violates the independence of the student society. However, student representatives do not have unlimited power. Igor Sadikov was elected Arts Representative to SSMU. His job is to represent the Faculty of Arts. This entitles him to advocate on behalf of the Faculty of Arts to the student government. It does not allow him to advocate violence towards students. When Sadikov overstepped the bounds of his job to advocate violence, it meant this was no longer a student society issue but a safety issue.

Students at McGill have chosen to attend this university, but students do not have a choice to join SSMU—SSMU fees are mandatory. If McGill mandates that students join a student society, then SSMU must represent the interests of every student. While SSMU cannot do a perfect job, students have a right to be represented by someone who does not advocate violence against them. If SSMU is not willing to protect students from the violent threats of their representatives, it is the administration’s duty to step in.

Maintaining the independence of SSMU would be ideal. However, there are some things that are more important than the independence of student societies. Violence cannot be permissible from any McGill student—let alone a student government representative. Sadikov does not have an unconditional right to serve as Arts Representative, this was a privilege granted by his fellow students. He lost that privilege when he advocated violence against Zionist students. Students must feel safe from violence at McGill. If the student society will not step in, the administration must. Violence against a religious or political group cannot be condoned in any way at McGill or any university campus.

Norman Yallen

McGill Arts Graduate, '16

Chill Thrills, Out on the Town, Private, Student Life

Viewpoint: A first-timer’s look at Nuit Blanche

by Janine Xu on

More in Chill Thrills:

Every winter, the streets of Quartier des Spectacles in downtown Montreal light up in celebration of Montreal en Lumière, one of the largest winter festivals in the world. The festival began in 2000 as a way of introducing people to Montreal’s winter scene. Combining performance art, gastronomy, unique art exhibits, and family-friendly activities, Montreal en Lumière showcases the best of Montreal’s diverse culture over two-weeks. Nuit Blanche, which literally translates to “White Night,” is a night-time festival that wraps up Montreal en Lumière each year. On March 4, over 200 events occurred in tandem in many different locations around the city, sending a pulse of energy through Montreal’s already bustling nightlife for the evening.

Despite the sub-zero temperatures and chilly winds blowing in my face, I was determined to make the most of Nuit Blanche. I started off the night at Atrium le 1000, an indoor skating rink inside the building 1000 de la Gauchetiere. Although I hadn’t skated in nearly eight years, and the prospect of going on the ice was daunting, I squeezed on my skates and made my way to the ice. The rink was lit up in hues of neon light—bright greens, pinks, and blues and, combined with the Beatles music playing overhead, the setup resembled a retro roller skating rink.

The actual skating part was difficult at first but I found myself more enthralled watching the people who were on the ice on a Saturday night. A mix of teenagers, young children with their parents, and couples were skating around in circles under the bright lights. This diversity gave the arena a very welcoming feeling, pointing to Nuit Blanche’s unique ability to bring out many different demographics on this singular winter night. Not long after I found my balance, the rink became incredibly full, which I took as my cue to move on to my next stop for the evening.

[metaslider id=51287]

The Montreal Museum of Fine Arts was my next destination. It hosted a stained glass workshop inspired by the museum’s current main exhibit, Marc Chagall’s Colour and Music, a multidisciplinary exhibit heavily influenced by Russian music and folklore. The workshop took on an arts and crafts approach, giving people the freedom to paint their own makeshift stained glass using plastic film and acrylic paints. The stained glass workshop included a free vodka and pretzel-tasting session, as well as live jazz performances. Although the lineups were incredibly long—especially for the vodka—the mood was festive. With the jazz ensemble playing in the background, people in line danced along to the music. While was fun, what was notably missing from the evening was an educational aspect, and I left with a desire for more information on how stained-glass is actually created.

I ended the night at Place des Festivals, an outdoor area that hosted many different activities. The area was full of attendees: Crowds danced to EDM, waited in line for the ferris wheel, and sipped coffee inside the warmth of tents. The winter weather encouraged a communal atmosphere among the festival’s attendees, as people crowded around fire pits with sausages and marshmallows to roast over the open fire. I enjoyed chocolate stuffed waffles from a food truck with hot chocolate, and suddenly the cold didn’t seem so biting anymore.

Despite the chilly weather and long lineups, my first Nuit Blanche experience was incredibly interesting, and I left feeling a stronger sense of community with fellow Montreal residents. I got to see a fun, artistic, and cultural side of Montreal, meeting new people at each of the events I attended. The one downside is that it only occurs once a year—now all that’s left is to wait for next winter.

McGill, News

UPenn professor presents study on American and Canadian trade opinions

by Julia Metraux on

More in McGill:

On Feb. 24, Diana C. Mutz, a professor of Political Science and Communication at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn), gave a presentation at Thomson House on her study “Mass Opinion Toward Trade in the United States and Canada.” The event was sponsored by the Centre for the Study of Democratic Citizenship and was open to the public.

Political science postdoctoral researcher at Université de Montréal (UdeM) Valérie-Anne Mahéo introduced Mutz, explaining that the professor’s work focuses on the instability of opinions on international trade.

“We know now how this is such an important topic and is covered so much in American politics,” Maheo said. “A few years back, [Mutz] started to look at globalization of trade. Now, we see how hot of a topic this is and we have [U.S. President] Donald Trump and [Canadian Prime Minister] Justin Trudeau talking daily on the phone about that.”

Mutz said there are many factors that influence opinions towards trade in the U.S., including peoples’ level of education.

“[…Education] is a huge predictor of trade support,” Mutz said. “People who are more educated are more supportive of international trade and that is true across many different countries.”

Racism or prejudice can also impact attitudes towards trade, according to Mutz. Her study found that racial minorities are more likely to support international trade due to fewer racist attitudes in those groups.

“Measures of domestic racism predicted trade attitudes,” Mutz said. “If you ask Latinos, Blacks, and Whites on how they feel about each other, that’s a really strong predictor of attitudes towards international trade. Peoples’ opinions towards ‘others’ tends to generalize and that can relate to foreigners as well.”

Mutz plans to expand her research to examine U.S. trading partners other than Canada. Mutz started to research Canada due to its proximity and perceived differences in opinions on trade found in other studies.

“I am interested in looking at all of [the U.S.’s] trading partners,” Mutz said. “[….] I also knew from the American context that it would be good to have a place with different attitudes towards trade as a whole. Canada is far more positive towards trade. The main difference is that the [U.S.] values competition to an extreme extent, it is unmatched.”

Mutz elaborated that the survey she gave to Americans and Canadians tried to be nationally representative of each country. As part of her study, she found that a higher percentage of Americans supported isolationism than Canadians.

“The studies themselves were a two-part design, virtually the same,” Mutz said. “I did a nationally representative survey in both the [U.S.] and Canada. They were not [conducted at] exactly the same time, but both were pre-Trump. We did it on 3,000 people, then we went back to those people and ran a survey experiment.”

According to Mutz’s survey results, the high competitiveness of Americans can be seen through their opinion of the ideal outcome with a trade partner.

“We found the Americans were in favour of a win-lose situation, where the [U.S.] would win and another country would lose, while Canadians were in favour of a win-win situation, where Canada and its trading partner would both benefit,” Mutz said.

Mutz also gave presentations at Univeristié Laval on Feb. 21 and UdeM on Feb. 23, and said that visiting Canadian universities is crucial to further understanding the population’s perspective.


“It is important [to go to universities, like McGill] because people here have a lot more expertise of Canadian views,” Mutz said. “It’s good to understand each other.”

Science & Technology

Douglas Mental Health Institute identifies new target for slowing cancer growth

by Angelina Giordano on

More in Science & Technology:

Postdoctoral student Silke Kiessling and McGill Psychiatry Professor Dr. Nicholas Cermakian conducted a study out of the Douglas Mental Health Institute to better understand how people’s biological clocks affect cancer cells. Specifically, they examined whether cancer cells’ growth can be inhibited by targeting the biological clock.

The study was published in the journal BMC Biology in February. It was based on a simple question: If the circadian rhythm of a tumour cell is fixed, will it slow its growth?

Tumour cells are different from healthy cells because their growth is unconstrained. Most healthy cells consistently divide every 24 hours due to their circadian clock. Also known as the “biological clock,” the circadian clock governs the body’s sleep-wake cycle, as well as regulating many physiological processes. The circadian clock can influence how and at what speed cells divide. Cancer gives rise to daughter cells in a way that’s not controlled.

This is the first study to show that the development of a tumour cell is remarkably slowed when its biological clock is targeted. The first experiments to prove the hypothesis took approximately a year and a half to complete, but the follow-up experiments to disprove that other variables might be affecting the results took over three years.

“[There were] many experiments to rule out other explanations,” Cermakian explained.

Previous research has shown that a circadian disruption in an individual, such as a shift worker, can increase his or her risk of cancer. When the researchers discovered that there was a correlation between the circadian clock and tumour growth, they wanted to understand how to inhibit that growth.

The research team worked with skin cells and colon tumours in mice and activated the circadian clock in these cells to compare cell cycle gene expression, cell cycle phase distribution, and tumour growth.

Cermakian emphasized that this experiment will affect cancer treatments by, hopefully, leading to preventative therapies and giving patients more time to fight the disease.

“You, me, and everyone in the population have disturbed rhythms,” Cermakian said.

While nobody’s circadian clock is perfect, this insight could lead to new targets for cancer treatment.

Now that there is a proven link between circadian rhythm hygiene and cancer risk, the hope is that the general population will do more to prioritize regulating their sleep-wake cycle.

The next step for this study is to see how the treatments used on cells in mice could be applied to humans, but it will take many more experiments before the researchers can get to that stage.

In the meantime, there are steps everyone can take to improve their circadian rhythm hygiene. Often, the first step is following the advice parents have told their kids for years, such as maintaining a uniform eating schedule, limiting screen time before bed, and sleeping at night as opposed to taking naps during the day.

Science & Technology

Zoos: Prisons or protection?

by Emma Gillies on

More in Science & Technology:

Animal lovers everywhere can relate to the excitement and wonder associated with going to the zoo. However, many are also dismayed by the small enclosures and the often oppressed and miserable-looking animals trapped inside.

Not surprisingly, animal welfare organizations, such as PETA, have spoken out against zoos, condemning their push for profits, as well as the unnatural and depressing environment in which many animals live.

They have a point, but PETA tends to paint the issue as black and white when, in fact, the reality is far more complex.

In contrast, organizations, such as the American Humane Association (AHA), are intent on elevating the welfare standards of zoos and aquariums worldwide. While the AHA acknowledge the problems in the system and the existence of notorious “bad actors,” like roadside zoos, they claim that, in general, zoos “ultimately enrich and protect the lives of animals.”

Dr. Jonathan Davies, associate professor in McGill’s Department of Biology, explained that it’s important to remember that life in captivity doesn’t impact all species equally.

“Invertebrates might be largely unaware they are in a zoo; whereas large vertebrates, especially primates, may suffer disproportionately,” Davies wrote in an email to The McGill Tribune.

Davies said that zoos may benefit individual animals, such as those rescued from private collectors or those injured in the wild that are no longer able to survive by themselves. In addition, zoos act as hubs for important research and can aid in captive breeding programs that increase the population numbers for reintroduction to the wild.

Captive breeding programs have saved numerous species, like the European bison, the red wolf, and the Arabian Oryx, from extinction. The Biodome in Montreal is involved in numerous research projects, ranging from the conservation of the golden lion tamarin in Brazil to the creation of a network of acoustic inventories of Quebec bats.

Still, most animals in zoos are not endangered and captive breeding programs are often not very successful. This is partially due to the fact that it is extremely difficult to release species back into the wild.

Some argue that the money used for merchandise and enclosure renovations might be better spent on protection efforts in the wild. Zoos often seem to place economic gain and entertainment above the welfare of the animals.

“[Zoos] can give the impression that animals can be treated as commodities and that their purpose is our entertainment,” Davies said.

The suffering of individual species that are sensitive to captive environments is also an apparent shortcoming.

“Some species should perhaps never be kept in captivity,” Davies said. “Zoos should never be seen as an alternative to preserving the natural environment.”

Extremely social animals, such as elephants and primates, as well as ones that roam, such as polar bears, do not do well in captivity. Great white sharks simply refuse to eat–the record length of time that a great white has been kept in captivity is only 44 days.

Still, zoos can instill a desire to help preserve biological diversity and connect people to the natural environment, albeit in artificial settings. Beyond zoos, it’s important to remember that the natural world has more potential for wildlife education, research, and conservation.

“You can think of a spectrum from books with pictures and wildlife documentaries, through natural history museums to wildlife safaris and the game parks of Africa, and finally to ecotourism that can allow us to see species in the wild,” Davies said.

Montreal, News

Université Laval first university in Canada to divest from fossil fuels

by Audrey Carleton on

More in Montreal:

On Feb. 15, Université Laval became the first Canadian university to commit to divest its endowment fund from fossil fuel-related companies. Fossil fuel investments made up an estimated five to 15 per cent of the university’s total endowment—equivalent to $11 to 30 million—according to Alice-Ann Simard, founder of ULaval sans fossiles and Master’s student in Business Administration at Université Laval.

This outcome for ULaval sans fossiles came after a three-month campaign, during which the activist group held talks, handed out buttons and stickers, and sparked conversation on campus about divestment from fossil fuels. After the activists garnered support from the general student body, undergraduate and graduate student associations, and the Quebec Chapter of the David Suzuki Foundation, the university administration asked to meet with ULaval sans fossiles. According to Simard, members of the administration discussed the university’s commitment to sustainability and expressed their willingness to divest from fossil fuel companies.

The ULaval sans fossiles campaign was identical to those at other universities across Canada, such as Divest McGill and Divest UBC, but achieved its goal very quickly. According to Simard, the difference for ULaval sans fossiles was that their message fell on receptive ears. Ranked second in the world in sustainable development on the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS) index, Université Laval has already worked to become a carbon-neutral campus.

“[The university administration] saw this opportunity to become leaders in the divestment movement in Canada and it was really [in alignment] with their image,” Simard said. “[….The administration] saw this wonderful opportunity to commit [to divestment] and to be the first to commit, because that’s in their values and in the university’s values.”

Despite the rejection of their petition calling McGill administration to divest from fossil fuels in March 2016, climate activist group Divest McGill continues to actively lobby the university to reverse this decision. According to a statement released by Divest McGill following Université Laval’s choice to commit to divest, ULaval sans fossiles’ success has only served to heighten Divest McGill’s energy.

“It is incredibly encouraging for us to see university administrators elsewhere in Canada finally side with students and science over the interests of the fossil fuel industry,” Jed Lenetsky, U2 Environment and Divest McGill organizer, was quoted in the statement. “Hopefully, this brave first step by Université Laval will give McGill administrators the necessary courage to take action for justice; to take the community’s longstanding calls for divestment to heart and commit to a more ethical endowment fund.”

Divest McGill Organizer Julia Bugiel, U3 Arts, said that because Université Laval is now credited as the first Canadian university to commit to divest, what remains for other universities is a race to avoid being the last to do so.

“Divest McGill has been asking McGill’s administration for years to put their money where their mouth is and to be the leader [in sustainability] that they always say they are,” Bugiel said. “McGill has lost that chance […], but they still can follow in the footsteps of schools, like [Université Laval], that are making those forward-thinking steps.”

On March 7, the Committee to Advise on Matters of Social Responsibility (CAMSR) met for the first time since its decision not to divest from fossil fuels in March 2016. According to Bugiel, this meeting served as an important resurgence into the public eye for Divest McGill, which held a rally outside the James Administration building at the same time.

“I think that ULaval sans fossiles and their campaign [sends] a strong message to the [McGill Board of Governors]–the only difficulty is how do we make sure that every single member of the Board of Governors is receiving that strong message,” Bugiel said.  “[….] A very important thing coming off of this [Université Laval] divestment decision is to use that to strengthen [students’] efforts towards divestment and to remind the community that Divest McGill is still here.”

 

 

A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that Université Laval is the first Canadian university to divest its endowment funds from fossil fuel-related companies. In fact, Université Laval has only committed to divestment at this point in time and has not yet divested from fossil-fuel related companies. The Tribune regrets this error.

McGill, News

Start of Fiat Lux major library upgrade delayed until more fundraising pledges are received

by Alexia Martel-Desjardins on

More in McGill:

Fiat Lux, which means ‘Let there be light’, is a renovation project for the Humanities and Social Science Library, which includes the McLennan and Redpath buildings. It aims to equip library facilities with state-of-the-art technology, in line with modern needs. The project is estimated to last five years and is to be completed in phases. In the first phase, a robotically accessible underground storage facility will be built. Then, Redpath hall and library will be revamped, and connected to McLennan. Finally, McLennan library will be renovated.

So far, no date has been set for the start of the Fiat Lux library construction, for which architecture firms ÉKM Architecture (ÉKM) and Shepley Buålfinch published a Master Plan in October 2015. The project seeks to modernize the McGill Humanities and Social Sciences Library with more open architecture. The construction, which is supposed to span a five-year period and is estimated to cost $180 million, requires more fundraising before it can begin.

The lack of financial resources has delayed the call for tenders for the construction contract. Colleen Cook, Trenholme dean of Libraries, is currently working on elaborating the layout of the financing strategy. 

“This project will cost $180 million […], but you fundraise by getting to know people and then after you form a relationship, then you ask [for funding],” Cook said. 

The Library Improvement Fund (LIF) is an ongoing initiative that raises money annually to be donated to the library. LIF Commissioner Malcolm McClintock believes potential donors might be more willing to give their seal of approval and to supply financial support if they had the guarantee that students would contribute financially to the project. 

“It’s been strongly suggested that [signature donors are] looking for financial support from the students, in terms of a fee,” McClintock said.

Ann Vroom, chair of Friends of the Library, a non-profit organization run by volunteers whose mission is to cultivate interest in McGill’s libraries and to provide support to its services and activities, is also looking for money through different avenues. 

“We are hoping [the financing] will be a combination of private philanthropy, university contributions, and some support from the students,” Vroom said.

McClintock is opposed to the idea of students partly financing Fiat Lux, especially since they are not well-informed about the project.

“I’ve actively said that I think this isn’t something that students should be paying for,” McClintock said. “[….] I see how in terms of fundraising that’s a very good tactic. I think it’s a just a little bit difficult to ask right now because people are so confused about what’s going on with Fiat Lux.”

Friends of the Library are currently using various methods to entice donors for the Fiat Lux project, such as alumni. 

“How the Fiat Lux project will be financed is what is being studied right now,” Vroom said. “[….] Through a series of salons in alumni homes across North America, where the Dean [Colleen Cook] can engage people with her story of the enduring value of libraries through the ages, we are lighting a fire of excitement about McGill’s plans for a re-envisioned library.”

No plans have been elaborated yet to compensate for the noise and lack of space that will result from the construction. 

 “I anticipate that it won't be any worse than what people have experienced already,” Cook said, referring to the construction on McTavish.

François Emond, an architect from ÉKM, explained the first phase of construction. It consists of transferring the library collection to the Automated Storage and Retrieval System, a storage section under the Lower Field where students will be able to send robots to retrieve books.

“The storage unit is the facilitator, that’s the thing that allows us to maintain the functionality of the library while all of the work goes on,” Emond said.

Cook estimated that the noise caused by the digging for the storage unit will last for a short time. The library will try to keep its services as accessible as possible. 

“It would only be a day, when you dynamite the bedrock,” Cook said. “[….] There will be some disruption, but […] we will do our absolute best to keep the buildings open and to mitigate the construction to all our users.” 

Both McClintock and Emond have expressed their desire for students to be involved in the designing process of the new library. 

“We try to get as much student feedback as possible and I think we’d be able to use the research we’ve got this year and the years to come to better manipulate what the Fiat Lux would be,” McClintock said.

Commentary, Opinion, Private

Why I resigned from the SSMU Board of Directors

by Sean Taylor on

More in Commentary:

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU)—who could have expected that such an innocuous-sounding group could elicit such a divisive reaction? And yet, we the student body, are embroiled in yet another series of scandals involving SSMU.

SSMU is a body that supplies many services to students that are rarely noticed—it lobbies for an easier exam deferral system, advocates for sexual assault resources, provides on-call medical services nightly in residences, as well as numerous other services that the student body often takes for granted. The week leading up to the winter break, however, have called into question the judgement and credibility of the society’s leadership. That’s why, before reading week, I tendered my resignation from my position on the SSMU Board of Directors.

I personally felt disdain for SSMU in my first year at McGill. I saw it as an annoying body that only led to undue tension and stress on campus, exemplified by Farnan-gate, the mis-election of Tariq Khan, and the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) General Assembly motions that caused emotional strife on both sides of the debate. In light of all of this anger and frustration that I and my friends felt toward SSMU, I decided that whining wasn’t going to help anyone. Instead, I involved myself in SSMU to try to find ways to get past the surface scandals and focus on the important services and support networks that lay beneath.

I was elected to the position of Science Representative to SSMU in 2015-2016, and Science Senator this year. I was also nominated to a seat on the Board of Directors of SSMU, which I have been a member of since Fall 2015. During these past two years, I have sat through hours upon hours of council, senate, senate caucus, committee, and board meetings, and have gained an understanding of governance documents, compromise, respectful discourse, and the beloved and bemoaned Robert’s Rules that dictate how meetings should be run. There have been ups and downs, but overall, it has felt like the governance bodies were working towards the betterment of the student society. Unfortunately, as of recently, that feeling has changed drastically for myself and other students.

 

 

 

 

The selfishness and misconduct demonstrated by Directors Aird and Sadikov, along with those that would further their personal and political agendas over the interests of the society, has led me to lose faith in the Board of Directors as a whole.

The reputation and image of the Board of Directors and Legislative Council have been dragged through the mud by students and media as a result of the actions of Directors Igor Sadikov and David Aird. The Board was not notified of the concerns over David Aird’s conduct until the Community Disclosure Network (CDN) released its findings to the public. The decision of SSMU executives to proceed with “check-in meetings” as the most appropriate way to address Aird’s behaviour is an insult to the standards that SSMU aims to maintain and promote on campus, and to the experiences of those who spoke out against Aird.

Director Sadikov’s tweet, which incited violence against a political identity espoused by a number of people on campus, was unacceptable and required more to remedy the situation than SSMU’s promises to have one-on-one discussions with those affected by his comments. The Board decided not to impeach him, but he has since resigned from his position as a director.

The hypocrisy exhibited by these two members who, as directors of SSMU, have a mandate to promote safety for all its members, is shocking. Despite the efforts by myself, some other executives, and members of the Board of Directors to repair the reputation and accessibility of SSMU, a few of the members on the board and the executive committee focused unduly on the persecutions of political identity and alleged strong-arming by McGill administration, delegitimizing the executive committee’s call for Sadikov’s resignation and undermining the discussion on appropriate conduct of students in leadership positions. The selfishness and misconduct demonstrated by Directors Aird and Sadikov, along with those that would further their personal and political agendas over the interests of the society, has led me to lose faith in the Board of Directors as a whole. I see no other course of action than to resign from my directorship.

It is a shame that the actions of a few have tarnished the image of other members of both the board and executive committee who have worked incredibly hard to improve the society. I wish them the best and have faith they will do their best for the SSMU; sadly, I can no longer justify putting my time and effort into something which now seems to have such little internal respect for its integrity and well-being.

 

 

 

 

Sean Taylor is a student Science Senator.

 

@mcgilltribop | [email protected]

 

 

 

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Cinema du Parc gives back to the community

by Jordan Foy on

More in Arts & Entertainment:

Cinéma du Parc is a small theatre, tucked away in the lower levels of the Galeries du Parc mall, but once in the shopping complex it is hard to miss. Its movie posters decorate the mall swalls and the delicious smell of popcorn often wafts its way up to shoppers. Upon entry, one is immediately pleased by the look of the cozy theatre, and at a glance it seems as if the establishment is simply a cute cinema that showcases independent films. 

Jean-Francois Lamarche acts as the assistant-director general and director of programming at Cinema du Parc. Lamarche elaborated on the history of the theatre, and its community-oriented mission.

“The base of our philosophy and our mission [is that] we are a social economy. [We’re] really about giving back to the community and to our employees,” explained Lamarche.

 Beyond simply showcasing newly released films, Cinema du Parc offers opportunities for community involvement in the form of festivals and educational documentary screenings.

The theatre was constructed at the same time as Galeries du Parc in 1977. According to Lamarche, the theatre drew in customers for a very different reason back then.

“It was officially the first multiplex [in Montreal]. Before that, the theatres were big halls with a thousand seats, [and Cinéma du Parc] was the first one with three screens,” Lamarche said. “Right now, it’s the smallest theatre in [Montreal].” 

Over the years, the ownership and name of the theatre changed multiple times. Originally named Cinema La Cité, the name was changed to Cinéma du Parc in the 1990s. 

Today, the theatre is non-profit and showcases films from a wide variety of genres and  countries. The theatre also holds special events and festivals—such as the International Children’s Film Festival, which aims to get future filmmakers interested in the industry. 

The theatre mostly shows independent films—films that are produced outside of the major film studio system and produced and distributed by independent entertainment agencies.

Of the many kinds of films shown at Cinéma du Parc, the most popular are still the bigger American productions. 

“What works the [best] is the big independent American titles […] for example, right now we have La La Land, Moonlight, [and] Manchester by the Sea,” Lamarche said.

Even so, the theatre has a unique approach in showcasing these kinds of films, in that it plays movies in the language they were originally filmed in, in this case English, with French subtitles. 

“The difference [between us and the] other multiplexes in Montreal showing [these kinds of films] is we have French subtitles, so we can reach out to both the English community, with the fact that the film is in its original language, and [to] the French, with French subtitles,” explained Lamarche. 

Cinéma du Parc does this intentionally  to respect and maintain the original film. Other films in other languages are also treated this way, and are shown in the original language, with either English or French subtitles. 

On top of maintaining the originality of each film, Cinéma du Parc’s approach to film screening goes beyond the film itself. The theatre offers a more hands-on, educational experience, especially in screening documentaries. 

“We try to show a lot of documentaries on subjects that matter to us, and we do a lot of Q&A’s with [directors], or if we don’t have the director, sometimes we get a professional [who is knowledgable on] the subject […] do Q&A’s on certain nights,” said Lamarche. 

The theatre often participates in festivals connected to cultural communities within Montreal. “If we have a Turkish film, we are going to reach out to the Turkish community,” Lamarche said, “[and] they can come and be welcome.”

Cinéma du Parc provides an environment that enhances the theatre experience,  creating a place where moviegoers can congregate to enjoy and discuss films with other cinephiles. 

“People can go out, and they can meet, and talk together, and we have our employees [that] know the films and they can talk to you about [them],” Lamarche said.

In the future, the theatre aims to cater to the nightlife crowd, potentially including a small restaurant and a liquor licence so that moviegoers can enjoy a good beer with the show. 

Cinéma du Parc is undoubtedly a special place in the Montreal cinematic community, and through its endeavors in food and entertainment events the theatre will continue to innovate and enhance its film-viewing experience in the years to come.

 

Cinéma du Parc offers a youth price of $11 for ages 18-25. On “Cheap Tuesdays” general admission is $10.  

Private, Student Life

The rise of self-care in the age of high-stress

by Grace Bahler on

More in Private:

Arising out of a culture that values self-love and depreciation of stress, the concept of “self-care” is vast and multi-faceted. Though there are a myriad of ways to interpret and implement the practice, one common theme underlies them all—a notion of breaking away from stress and sadness to find comfort, peace, and happiness in something.

Under the umbrella of self-care are various interpretations that manifest in popular philosophies. Among them is the “treat-yo-self” trend, originating from NBC’s Parks and Recreation. This emerging lifestyle is one of occasional indulgence, in which the cure to stress and sadness can be found by simply spending some money. Whether it’s getting brunch with friends, buying a nice leather jacket, or booking a vacation, the treat-yo-self mantra dictates that everyone deserves a treat, and often, after forking over some cash.

However one may go about self-care, there are loads of mechanisms for de-stressing from which to choose. This is the age of bath-bombs and facemasks, vino and chocolate, and candles and comfort. Yet one can’t help but wonder, is self-care really as simple as a trip to the spa, or as superficial as a face-mask? Though material items have their perks, the self-care movement seems to give them a great deal of central importance. This begs the question: What do scented candles and nail polish do for mental health, given that one can afford them?

Melissa Montana, U2 Arts, is one among many students who incorporate a self-care routine into their lives. A fan of the treat-yo-self philosophy, she views self-care as finding  a balance between a demanding academic life and staying physically and mentally healthy. Even so, she affirms the importance of occasional extravagance, enjoying her share of bath-bombs and restful nights.

“Self-care means knowing that doing well in school is important, but also making sure that you take time for yourself,” Montana said. “Take those bubble-baths and listen to Beyoncé and do the things that bring you back down to earth.”

Montana is a strong advocate of allocating time just for oneself—a pertinent part of self-care—and she often spends that precious time in the gym or reading a book before bed. To her, taking care and loving oneself is about working in moderation, while leaving room for a sprinkle of indulgence in her routine.

“It’s the little things, the little pick-me-ups [that matter most],” Montana said. “You don’t need to do the whole, ‘I’m engaging in self-care’ [thing because] it’s the little things that make you happy.”

Like Montana, Ben Cantor-Adams, U2 Arts, also believes the little things really are part of the bigger picture. Being happy and healthy are the cornerstones of his own self-care practice. Instead of treating self-care as an indulgence, he focuses on cultivating sustainable and small routines, like adequate hydration, a healthy diet, and getting as much rest as he can.

Cantor-Adams’ practice is unique, as it strays away from the pressure to spend money to be happy. Often, material goods are portrayed as essential to self-care, which poses an unrealistic financial burden for many who seek mental wellness outlets. Cantor-Adams focuses on managing his time and maintaining a realistic workload to achieve both strong mental health and academic success.

“For me, it’s mainly about knowing my own limits and trying to respect those limits while also getting work done,” Cantor-Adams said. “I guess the way that I practice self-care is to always make sure that I’m keeping track of how much time it realistically takes me to do things, and making sure that I have enough time for everything that I’m trying to do.”

As a university student, Cantor-Adams values his time. Like every undergraduate student at McGill, he is often inundated with papers and tests, barely finding the time for a regular shower and enough sleep.

“Something that I’ve learned, being in university, is that time is everything and everything takes time,” Cantor-Adams said. “[…] It’s not necessarily how you spend the time, it’s that you’re taking that time to relax, to do something you enjoy, to do something that’s not necessarily work or a source of stress. It’s letting yourself do things that feel good without necessarily feeling bad about it.”  

The rise in this love-yourself and treat-yo-self rhetoric is only the beginning of the self-care sensation—in a stressful university environment and a seemingly eternally-cold northern climate, taking time for oneself is essential to creating a balanced life. The fact that it is so novel to do so says a lot about the pressures of university life, in which mental health and levels of happiness are often eclipsed by academic pressures and life stressors. Yet self-care offers a respite from these and other lows of life, serving as a unique glimpse into the good.

Though self-care practices can be valuable for maintaining good mental health, this is not a substitute for formal treatment, such as therapy or medication. To find out more about mental health services available on campus, visit the McGill University Health Centre at www.muhc.ca, or the Peer Support Centre at www.ssmu.mcgill.ca/psc/.

1 … 671 672 673 674 675 … 1,364

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue