Latest News

Science & Technology

How simulation learning is shaping inclusive healthcare

by Sarah McDonald on

More in Science & Technology:

Simulations are becoming a more and more common training method for medical students. In a typical simulation, students resolve a medical case presented by an actor, and then participate in debriefing sessions led by a supervisor to analyze and critically review their experience and performance. This process commonly follows the “Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation” (PEARLS) framework, developed by Adam Cheng and Walter Eppich in 2015. While this protocol has been effective in safely preparing medical students for interactions with real patients, work remains to be done on incorporating diversity, equity, and inclusion into the trainings. 

In a recent paper published in the journal Advances in Simulation, Niki Soilis, a doctoral student at McGill’s Institute of Health Sciences Education, presents an altered version of the PEARLS protocol which examines the impact of social structures on healthcare and explores ways to mitigate systemic inequalities.

Soilis, now completing her doctoral studies, previously worked as the education manager at McGill’s Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences for eight years. During that time, she noticed a significant underrepresentation of marginalized communities in medical training—an issue she is now tackling through her research.

“That became kind of the driver of, ‘How do we, as a program, start to integrate more inclusive and diverse perspectives in our curriculum?’ I started to look at the ways we can go more mainstream and make it into the culture of our programs,” Soilis said in an interview with The Tribune.

To address this gap, Soilis collaborated with other professionals to incorporate the Community Links Evidence to Action Research (CLEAR) toolkit into medical simulations. Developed at McGill, the CLEAR toolkit helps healthcare practitioners integrate advocacy and awareness of social determinants of health into their daily practice. 

Initially tested by frontline healthcare workers who attested to its efficacy, the toolkit was subsequently integrated into the PEARLS approach to debriefing, ultimately leading to the creation of the PEARLS Debriefing for Social Justice and Equity (DSJE) tool. Implementing the PEARLS DSJE tool is more cost-effective as compared to creating separate simulations programs specifically for diversity and inclusion.

“So we kind of merged two worlds, hoping that they would be more accessible,” Soilis said. “It was a way of allowing people to really have dialogue on a consistent basis, rather than making programs that are just dedicated to that. Simulation is one of the most expensive educational modalities—it’s known as highly effective, but it’s much more expensive than classroom-based teaching—so this became a way of making [diversity, equity, and inclusion] more incorporated.”

The PEARLS protocol underwent further refinement after consultations with Cheng and Eppich, its original creators. One of the key additions was an “Activism” phase, which encourages discussions on how systemic inequalities affect patient care and how practitioners can address these barriers.

This phase prompts medical trainees to consider how follow-up care should be handled while recognizing the complex intersectional realities of medical treatment.

“My research is specifically in [houselessness], and one of the interventions that we’ve discussed in groups is, when a person comes in, doing an analysis of their psychosocial profile and understanding their context,” Soilis said. “Where do they get to sleep? Are they on a substance? So sometimes it’s not these grand changes: It’s just having an awareness of a bigger picture, not just the person.” 

Another key update to the PEARLS DSJE framework is its emphasis on community engagement. In practice, this means incorporating discussions about systemic inequalities within healthcare, the marginalization of certain communities, and strategies for fostering a more supportive and inclusive medical environment.

Soilis and her team hope that by implementing this new version of the framework, healthcare professionals can actively work towards reducing harmful biases in medical practice.

“It shouldn’t be the only way. It should still [be part of] a better-integrated curriculum, but this is one way, and we’re hoping that through our experience in implementing it, others will see its value,” Soilis said.

Soilis offered some advice for current and future medical students at McGill. “Just stay open, in practice, to reflecting on [yourself] continuously,” Soilis said. “Look at why we are the way we are, with a nonjudgmental stance, and reflect on how it affects how we deliver care.”

Hockey, Sports

The Tribune’s sports highlights of the week

by Zain Ahmed on

More in Hockey:

International: Canada clinches the 4 Nations Trophy 

In a finish that perfectly encapsulated the spirit of international hockey, Team Canada secured a pulsating 3-2 overtime victory over Team USA on the back of a show-stopping finish from number 97, centre Connor McDavid. In the stands and across the country, the crowd went wild. 

Carving their route to the final, Canada defeated Finland 5-3 and Sweden 4-3 in two back-and-forth showstopping games, but fell short 3-1 to Team USA in their last preliminary fixture. Within nine seconds of the opening buzzer, both Brady and Matthew Tkachuk—brothers from the U.S.—as well as Brandon Hagel of Canada saw the sin bin for dropping their gloves and letting the fireworks rip. Canada could not come away with victory—that is, until the final. 

Canada centre Nathan MacKinnon kicked off the scoring in the first period with a nifty wrist shot that nestled into the back of the net. Shortly after, though, USA enforcer Brady Tkachuk tapped in the puck to level the score. The back-and-forth affair saw momentum swings that kept fans on the edge of their seats, with neither team able to establish more than a one-goal advantage throughout regulation time. Midway through the second period, defenseman Jake Sanderson hurled the puck at goal, and it flew in off a slight deflection for a 2-1 lead for the USA. Every shot and every save seemed to echo with championship implications. And that is exactly how it went, with USA centre Sam Bennett shelving an assist from right winger Mitchell Marner to tie the game up in the latter stage of period two. 

In the end, it took sudden death overtime to separate the evenly matched sides, with Canada finding that extra gear when it mattered most. With the clock creeping down, at the eight-minute mark of overtime, Team Canada found a moment of brilliance. Fans had their hearts in their mouths as McDavid screamed up the ice to get in position in front of the net. Marner’s hard work in the left corner of the USA defensive area culminated in a smooth flick pass back into the middle of the ice to McDavid, who controlled the puck, pulled back, and released his shot. Everything seemed to move in slow motion. The puck crashed into the net, and Canadians all around the world unleashed a collective cheer. 

After a tumultuous month for Canadians in the political sphere following threats from U.S. President Donald Trump, this win was momentous, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau remarking to the U.S.: “You can’t take our country—and you can’t take our game.”

McGill: Redbirds hockey wrestle a win in the quarter-finals 

In a tense quarter-final matchup, the fourth-place McGill Redbirds Hockey secured a crucial 2-1 victory over the fifth-ranked Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR) Patriotes in Laval on Wednesday night. Right winger Charles-Antoine Dumont emerged as the hero, netting the game-winning shot with just over three minutes remaining in regulation. 

The game, which started 40 minutes late due to a shattered glass pane during warm-ups, showcased McGill’s defensive prowess as they nullified the UQTR attack through each period. Although neither team scored within the first period, forward Alexandre Gagnon opened the scoring midway through the second period, asserting his dominance and swinging momentum in McGill’s favour. 

Away days always come with a bit more than what meets the eye, and this game was no smooth skating. UQTR’s forward, Felix Lafrance, evened the score on a power play late in the second, and after a serious battle in the UQTR defensive end, Dumont’s clutch goal off a rebound from centre Xavier Fortin sealed the win for the Redbirds. Goaltender Alexis Shank stood strong with 21 saves, giving McGill their fifth win in six meetings with UQTR this season.The Redbirds proceeded to capitalize on their lead with a dominant 5-2 victory away at Trois-Rivières, sweeping the series and skating proudly into a league semi-final series against Concordia Stingers starting on Feb. 26. Earlier this season, the Redbirds lost to the Stingers 1-3 in a regular season faceoff and 3-7 in the Corey Cup. A high-stakes week lies ahead as the team hopes for redemption and a shot at the final. Fly Birds!

Science & Technology

The unspoken crisis: How fears of aging are expressed in news reporting

by Samathar Senso on

More in Science & Technology:

With the prevalence of cosmetic procedures, skincare products, and diets aimed at reducing the effects of aging, and with tech entrepreneurs spending millions annually in the hopes of reversing the process, aging is often seen as something to be feared and prevented at all costs. Five years ago, when the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic made its way to Canada, it disproportionately struck older adults, specifically those in long-term care homes: Around 80 per cent of COVID-19 deaths occurred in adults aged 65 and older. Although mainstream media heavily reported on the deaths of older individuals, their portrayal reflects our society’s underlying negative sentiment towards older adults and aging. 

In a recent paper published in Ageing & Society, Oluwagbemiga Oyinlola, medical social worker and doctoral candidate at McGill’s School of Social Work, and his colleagues examined how the media’s portrayal of COVID-19 deaths in long-term care homes often employed a tragedy narrative that elicited a sense of pity for older adults while simultaneously trivializing their deaths. 

Examining news outlets’ portrayals of older adults during the pandemic provides deeper insight into societal attitudes toward this age group. Media coverage often depicted older adults as vulnerable and helpless, reflecting society’s tendency to view older people as a burden. This portrayal not only reinforced pre-existing negative stereotypes regarding older adults but also shaped public perception, in turn influencing the public health response. 

“[Articles] were written within the lens of a humanitarian crisis and tragedy rather than through the lens of action and really supporting older adults to grow and thrive in long-term care,” Oyinlola said in an interview with The Tribune.

To analyze media reporting, Oyinlola and his colleague, postdoctoral researcher Sabrina Lessard, independently reviewed 74 articles on long-term care home residents during the pandemic, with the sample drawing from both Ontario and Quebec. Their analysis, in collaboration with their supervisor Professor Tamara Sussman, helped uncover insights into societal attitudes towards older adults as reflected in the media. 

“The [sources in the] reporting mostly came from government officials and those working in long-term care. Although the main focus was older adults, they were totally excluded when it came to hearing their own experience,” Oyinlola added. 

The fact that reporting on older individuals relied almost completely on the perspectives of workers and family members, rather than the individuals themselves, speaks volumes on how older adults are viewed as an “othered” group that requires pity instead of as integral members of society. 

“Excluding older adults as a separate entity is a tragedy and form of ageism in itself and stigmatizes them as a separate group which needs humanitarian [support],” Oyinlola said. 

Additionally, media coverage primarily focused on those living in long-term care homes, despite only four per cent of older individuals residing in these facilities. This focus, portraying the deaths within these centres as a spectacle and tragedy, overshadowed the broader issues facing older adults during the pandemic. 

“COVID-19 taught us very explicitly that ageism is a highly embedded and internalized feeling about aging and being old,” Sussman remarked. “The fear is so high for all of us that we are willing to do everything we can to ‘other’ and [exclude] older adults as a way of reassuring ourselves from our own anxiety towards aging.” 

By framing these events as an inevitable tragedy rather than addressing the situation as one that requires protective action from both governments and the general public, older adults were effectively alienated from the wider community. 

The next stage of Oyinlola’s research aims to explore the first-hand experiences of older adults during the pandemic. To properly address the issues facing older adults in Canada moving forward, we must unpack our negative perceptions of aging and reconsider our obsession with youth.

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Players’ Theatre’s ‘Do You Feel Anger?’ is a sardonic satire of human fallibility

by Bianca Sugunasiri on

More in Arts & Entertainment:

It’s easy enough to show empathy to those who deserve it. But how on earth do you feel empathetic when you’re in a crappy little office, with your autocratic boss breathing in your ear that he doesn’t “only love piss charts” but also his niece? 

Do You Feel Anger? by Mara Nelson-Greenberg chronicles an empathy coach’s fruitless attempts to inspire compassion in an office of debt collectors convinced that empathy is a type of bird. The cast of Players’ Theatre’s Winter 2025 production of the piece (dir. Emma Qian), showcased juvenile anger, misogyny, and outright insanity through astonishing control of facial and physical comedy. The show transported audiences back into the aforementioned conference room where Sophia (Ellie Mota, U3 Arts) struggles to be empathetic towards everyone without endorsing the poor behaviour that is perpetuating the misogynistic status quo. Rapidly delivered dialogue rich with impassioned intonation punctuates the scene, revealing to the audience the complex emotions behind the characters’ words.

From lights up to curtain, audiences were immersed into a world so close to reality it was a little discomforting. Seven chairs, two tables, a file cabinet, day-old coffee, and a baseball bat were nearly all that made up the simple set, yet the actors’ interactions with them brought them vividly to life. The prop bird that soared over the office, still mistaken as literally being empathy, showcased the crew’s design creativity. Qian revealed in an interview with The Tribune that the laborious ideation of this effect began with chucking a stuffed bird across the stage. 

Not only did the actors deliver strong performances in the drab office, but—with help from the stage crew—they managed to pull off a seamless quick-change that turned the stage from a crappy office into a crappy bathroom. All aspects displayed clever design, from the functional stall doors to the misogynistic hangman graffiti on the walls. In an interview, Stage Manager Juliette Levy-Gay, U1 Arts,  told The Tribune that this setting bears an alarmingly realistic message in being the only space in the office where the women’s true feelings could be expressed without sexualization. 

Each costume reflected the characters’ essences, from Eva (Gabrielle Germain, U3 Arts)’s puffed-sleeved innocence to Howie (Maya Kanitkar, U4 Science)’s “daddy’s yacht” quarter-zip sweater. Sophia’s costume change from slacks to a hyper-sexualized skirt punctuated her building estrangement from her values. 

The actors built off the setting and costuming groundwork to turn the office into a maelstrom of mid-life crisis and shameless emotional misconduct. Mota navigated a slow decline from patient placation to a break into self-destruction, her soft-spoken voice interrupted by comparatively jarring outbursts of frustration that climaxed with a terrifying wielding of a baseball bat. 

Germain took full advantage of microexpressions to convey her character’s complexity. Although her breathless, frantic way of speaking, nearly never finishing her sentences evoked X,  the highlights of her performance were the silent reactions of her countenance to the misdeeds around her. The tears glimmering but never quite falling from her eyes, the stiff upper lip of someone struggling not to break, and a jittery leg under the table externalized her inner distress beyond the power of words. 

Darcy Blaik, U1 Education, as Jon, mastered the subtle mannerisms of a sleazy boss that are never quite fireable but just enough to make everyone uncomfortable. His ever-present Cheshire grin, tendency to lean into every woman he speaks to, and strange habit of laying himself across the table—very “draw me like one of your French girls”-style—undoubtedly made everyone in the audience feel the anger. 

Kanitkar was a hurricane and an audience favourite. Their commitment to physical comedy sold their performance, from kicking a chair so hard that it 360’d in the air to—what I imagine was improv—biting into a prop apple and ripping it fully in half with such vigour that nearly everyone in the scene broke to join the audience in laughter. 

A special mention to Elias Luz (U0 Arts), as Old Man, who despite only being onstage for five minutes, had the entire audience doubled over with his raspy but somehow screeching monologue about being left on the playground. 

This Players’ Theatre performance had audiences feeling everything but anger. Although unfortunately, Howie never did discover that empathy was in fact not a bird, Do You Feel Anger? implored audiences to question how they exhibit empathy, and the consequences of taking it away. 

Do You Feel Anger? played from February 18 to February 21 at Players’ Theatre.

Editorial, Opinion

Winter 2025 SSMU Executive Endorsements

by Tribune Editorial Board on

More in Editorial:

The Tribune’s Editorial Board presents its endorsements of the candidates for the 2025-2026 Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Executive Committee. Editors researched and communicated with each candidate before leading an Editorial Board discussion on the candidates’ qualifications and vision for their prospective roles. Editors with conflicts of interest abstained from discussing, writing, and editing relevant reviews.

President

Dymetri Taylor 

Taylor’s second run for election, after one year of holding the President position, centres on three core tenets: Governance, identity, and fiscal. He plans to update the governing SSMU documents and delegate the powers of the SSMU Board of Directors (BoD) to the SSMU Legislative Council, allowing the latter to receive reports, authorize spending, and more, in an effort to allow for a democratic and comprehensive decision-making process. To create a stronger campus-wide community, Taylor will focus on orientation week for first-years, planning an introductory SSMU presentation for all first-years, encouraging them to get involved with university governance, and increasing campus engagement with student bodies. Fiscally, Taylor hopes to save money by combining the VP Internal and VP Sustainability and Operations positions. He wants to use this money to host more events, such as a carnival or re-instating Frosh dinner. He wants to work toward divestment from weapons manufacturing through the Board of Governors (BoG) but states that it’s a matter of phrasing the proposal in a way the BoG can approve. Taylor additionally has plans to improve institutional memory, voter turnout, and administrative relations—all through better record-keeping, freshman engagement, and public emphasis on student concerns. 

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Dymetri Taylor

The Tribune endorses Taylor for a second term. He has concrete plans to increase student democracy and allow for more students to hold decision-making powers. Taylor’s year of experience holding the position has given him the institutional experience to effectively and seamlessly improve governing documents and increase student engagement. However, The Tribune is wary of Taylor’s approach to student calls for pro-Palestine activism and divestment from Israeli weapons manufacturing. While he claims he has plans to continue working with the BoG to draft a divestment proposal—an area where his institutional memory could prove an asset—in his one year in the role, he has not taken any concrete steps toward this. Furthermore, he must work tirelessly to gain back the trust of the student community regarding upholding student democracy, given recent calls for his impeachment. He must be honest and open with the student body of SSMU’s constraints, and take a firmer stance in support of student activism. 

VP Finance

John Vogel

Vogel cites experience with administrative financial work, which he deems the key focus of VP Finance. He hopes to sustain current VP Pauline Jolicouer’s eradication of SSMU’s deficit, while also improving administrative efficiency: A lack of which has previously caused delays to SSMU approving funding applications and club bank accounts. This would allow Vogel to maximize financial allocations to campus activism and local community groups, in collaboration with VP External. As the SSMU member who moved to impeach President Taylor in December 2024, Vogel reports no concerns about their collaboration if both are elected to the incoming executive team. Vogel further states that his motion to impeach was symptomatic of longstanding structural problems with SSMU, which he stated are not VP Finance’s focus. He commits to publicly advocating for progressive political movements supported by a student majority that highlight these issues with SSMU’s governance, particularly the right to Palestinian liberation. 

Dylan Seiler: 

Seiler’s campaign centres around improving financial accessibility, transparency, and efficiency within SSMU. A key issue he aims to address is the understaffing of various Finance committees, such as the Funding Committee, which has caused delays in club and service funding. By properly staffing these positions, he hopes to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies. To promote transparency, he would release monthly financial expenditure reports and push for financial discussions to be held in public sessions rather than private ones. Dylan also prioritizes increasing accessibility to financial resources for student services, which currently lack direct access to their bank accounts. Drawing on his experience in the Music Undergraduate Students’ Association (MUSA), where he turned a $6,000 CAD deficit into a $5,000 CAD surplus by cutting unnecessary costs without reducing services to students, Dylan believes his financial expertise and governance experience set him apart from other candidates. 

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Dylan Seiler 

The Tribune endorses Seiler’s campaign for VP Finance. The VP Finance position requires extensive experience with large budgets and navigating bureaucratic barriers, which Seiler has demonstrated experience in with his work at MUSA. His close collaboration with the current VP Finance, Pauline Jolicoeur, provides a strong foundation for and assists in a smooth transition to, the work he would be taking on next year. Furthermore, Seiler’s McGill-focused campaign emphasizes transparency and accessibility by centring concerns of students, particularly regarding insurance coverage, club and service budgets, and SSMU expenditures. However, both Seiler and Vogel’s failures to appear at the SSMU candidates’ debate on Feb. 18 raise concerns over how committed they are to earning students’ votes. 

VP Sustainability and Operations

Kareem El Hosini 

El Hosini’s platform prioritizes the reallocation of space within the University Centre to better serve students’ needs. In particular, he intends to implement procedures for determining which clubs and services are in spaces appropriate to their needs, and consider reassigning space to provide offices for clubs that are currently on the waitlist, or provide larger offices for clubs that would benefit from them. He is also interested in finding ways to better utilize the two cafeteria spaces and the bookable rooms in the University Centre. Beyond the allocation of space, El Hosini hopes to improve transparency and communication through channels like an anonymous feedback form. In the area of sustainability, El Hosini has proposed providing more support for SSMU’s community garden. 

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Kareem El Hosini

The Tribune endorses El Hosini for VP Operations and Sustainability. El Hosini’s experience in operations and logistics from previous engineering internships would be an asset in the role. Further,  The Tribune appreciates his commitment to ensuring that space in the SSMU building is allocated fairly and efficiently—although The Tribune urges him to implement a robust consultation process involving all potentially affected parties and stakeholders. It is crucial to ensure that decisions about space allocation are made carefully and equitably, and that the SSMU building is accessible and welcoming to all students. Additionally, El Hosini’s platform remains unchanged from his previous run in the Fall 2024 SSMU By-Election, the results of which were nullified because it did not meet quorum requirements. The Tribune encourages El Hosini to consider ways to develop his intentions for the role, in particular in the areas of student engagement and sustainability. 

VP Internal: 

Zeena Zahidah*

Zahidah’s campaign focuses primarily on strengthening ongoing and traditional events such as Four Floors and Faculty Olympics, as well as placing more emphasis on the structure of the committees—namely the First Year Council. She wants to reinvigorate SSMU’s presence on campus and emphasize to students that SSMU is student-led and representative of the student body. 

*Zahidah did not respond to communication from The Tribune, so we were unable to ask her questions and evaluate all aspects of her campaign.

Endorsement: No to Zeena Zahidah 

Despite Zahidah’s experience in the role, as she is the current VP Internal, her lack of responsiveness and dedication to the role concerns The Tribune especially as her responsibilities as VP Internal will increase if the role of VP Sustainability and Operations is cut. Her goals for the upcoming school year were vague, despite having had a year to hone them. Executive hopefuls, both incumbents and newcomers, ought to be able to actively express a clear vision and passion for the role. If elected, The Tribune encourages Zahidah to increase her presence and responsiveness within the role, and clarify her aims for the next academic year. 

VP External

Jaanashee Punjabi

Punjabi has served as Sustainability Commissioner at SSMU and currently works as VP External for the McGill Environment Students’ Society. She has demonstrated strong leadership and a deep understanding of the importance of student engagement within both university structures and broader community initiatives. Her advocacy efforts span across various social justice causes, including collaborations with organizations like UTILE, ECOLE, and the McGill Office of Sustainability . Additionally, her involvement in municipal-level youth advocacy showcases her ability to engage with external groups and strengthen ties between SSMU, student unions across Quebec, and other universities. Punjabi’s platform is built on the goal of expanding student representation at the municipal and provincial levels, and has a proactive approach to fostering collaboration with external organizations. 

Seraphina Crema Black: As the VP External of MUSA, a member of the Legislative Council, and a student senator, Black attests that her past experience advocating for students’ interests has prepared her well for the responsibilities of VP External. Among Black’s priorities for the role is to strengthen SSMU’s ties with other student unions across Quebec to fight against common threats—such as tuition hikes. Stressing the need for SSMU’s engagement beyond McGill, Black looks to maintain strong ties with the Milton-Parc community and continue collaborating with UTILE on housing initiatives. Black also aims to build on Hugo-Victor Solomon’s work of engaging the student body through email and social media communications, as well as on-the-ground tabling on campus. Black believes that proactive engagement of student groups and transparency with constituents will create a trusting relationship with the student body, enabling her to best advocate for their needs. Black aims to maintain an unbiased stance on to genocide in Palestine and to represent students’ interest based on referendum votes, rather than personal views, noting that the Policy against Genocide in Palestine received a majority vote from students.

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Jaanashee Punjabi

While she expresses strong commitments to student movements, Indigenous advocacy, and Palestinian solidarity, Punjabi’s plans for translating these commitments into actionable policies remain vague. The Tribune believes that while Punjabi’s commitment to student activism is clear, the VP External role requires a more structured and detailed plan of action for students at all levels. Moreover, The Tribune holds that unlike Black’s proposed platform, the VP External role demands a greater commitment to anti-oppressive, anti-colonial politics, and that Solomon’s tenure demonstrated that support for Palestine and advocacy for SSMU’s constituency can, in fact, go hand-in-hand. 

VP Student Life

Raihaana Adira:

Drawing on experience on the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) Legislative Council, Financial Management Committee, the Dean of Arts Committee on Student Affairs, among involvement in departmental student associations, Adira is making her second bid for an SSMU executive position. She previously ran against Taylor for president in a by-election. This time around, she says she wants to focus on student services, mental health, and club funding. Her platform for VP Student Life has four key components: Addressing mental health, accessibility, supporting student groups, and advocating for affordable food options on campus. Specific actions within these goals include advocating for McGill to reinstate floor fellows in the residences, establishing a mental health task force, streamlining club approvals, and advocating for more student-run food options on campus. 

Hamza Abu Alkhair: 

Currently serving as Director of Clubs and Services, Abu Alkhair has effectively taken on many responsibilities of the vacant VP Student Life role. He aims to strengthen McGill’s sense of community by improving event promotion and cultural club integration and advocating for centralized platforms, in person and online, to enhance visibility. He also prioritizes increasing awareness of student services, including photography services offered by the McGill University Photography Students’ Society and free meals provided by Midnight Kitchen, through accessible information hubs. To address room booking inefficiencies faced by clubs outside the SSMU building, he proposes a streamlined venue booking system with an up-to-date contact directory. Additionally, he calls for revamping the SSMU website and replacing mandatory in-person workshops for club executives with self-paced training modules. Drawing from his leadership experience as former president of the Arab Students’ Network (ASN) and involvement in student governance, Abu-Alkhair is committed to improving accessibility, engagement, and transparency within SSMU. 

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Hamza Abu-Alkhair

Abu-Alkhair’s plans to improve event promotion, bolster club accessibility, and revamp SSMU’s website address key issues facing McGill students. His experience as Director of Clubs and Services and the president of an SSMU service gives him a leg up with a strong understanding of the role. His proposals to simplify room booking and enhance communication between student groups demonstrate his commitment to improving campus life and knowledge of the unique avenues available to VP Student Life to achieve these goals. However, his platform lacks a clear strategy for student mental health, a central aspect of the role, and he has not outlined concrete steps to ensure diverse student groups are represented. Given the VP Student Life portfolio’s responsibility for relations with clubs, services, and independent student groups—as well as for mental health promotion and collaboration with Student Services—The Tribune believes Abu-Alkhair is a strong candidate but urges him to prioritize a comprehensive mental health plan and a tangible framework for student representation.  

VP University Affiars

Susan Aloudat: 

As the VP Events for the ASN the last three years, Aloudat is now shifting her focus to the SSMU University Affairs portfolio. Running unopposed, Aloudat’s platform is based on three main priorities: Creating space to actively listen to students’ needs by instituting an open-door policy, being transparent around her work by maintaining the VP University Affairs blog, and organizing workshops to brainstorm solutions for students’ concerns. Aloudat wrote to The Tribune that her platform is purposefully “malleable” as she intends to shape her priorities around student needs once in office. She explained that she wants to start community consultations with SSMU services as they have their fingers on the pulse of the McGill student community and then extend to individual students. 

Endorsement: Yes, with reservations to Susan Aloudat The Tribune appreciates Aloudat’s commitment to listening to student concerns and shaping her actions based on constituent consultations. While Aloudat is a suitable candidate for the role, The Tribune encourages her to be more specific and ambitious in her plans for the VP University Affairs portfolio. This executive position is heavily involved in advocacy, research, and promoting equity; juggling these responsibilities is no small task. Therefore, The Tribune recommends that Aloudat find strategies to determine policy priorities early on so that she can actively work toward those goals during the year. Further, the VP University Affairs has one of the few student seats on the McGill Senate—a key leverage point in advocating for students to the administration. The current VP University Affairs, Abe Berglas, has set a high standard for how to effectively and consistently advocate for students through this governing body. Aloudat should consider how she can make the most of this opportunity.

A previous version of the article stated that Black wished to remain “neutral” on her stance on Palestine. Black in fact hopes to remain unbiased to advocate for students’ opinions as expressed through referendum questions. The Tribune regrets the error.

Off the Board, Opinion

A struggle meal, among friends

by Ella Paulin on

More in Off the Board:

I looked on, half horrified, half intrigued, as she set the timer for 10 minutes. Trying to hide my disgust, I attempted to confirm that this wasn’t some kind of strange mistake, a careless slip of the finger on the time selection wheel: “Did you mean to select 10 minutes, there?”

“Yeah, of course,” she responded, matter-of-factly. “That way, all the water cooks out, and the noodles get nice and soft. If you add the seasoning packet first, the flavour soaks in while it boils.” 

As a two-minute (or maybe three, if I get distracted) ramen-boiler, I was flabbergasted, but I decided after a few minutes that we could probably still be friends. Tolerance, after all, is crucial in such polarizing times as ours. 

At this point, the party was winding down, and the remaining guests were transitioning from tipsy to hungry. My friend’s ramen boiling—misguided as it may have been—set off something of a chain reaction. The smart thing to do would probably have been to boil a large pot of water and cook the packets all at once, but as it happened, a steady stream of people began preparing their own bowls of noodles, each one slightly different from the last. Whether it was boiling the water on the stove or using a kettle, cooking the noodles for two, three or four minutes (or, alas, 10…), adding vegetable bouillon or soy sauce or sriracha, or a host of other minor tweaks, everyone had their own routine—and everyone was convinced theirs was the best. 

While I was shuffling around the kitchen, avoiding the paths of these impromptu ramen chefs (it is, after all, impossible not to be in the way in a student’s kitchen), a whole world of instant ramen variations was revealed to me. I took on the role of observer, discovering details that had been lurking just beneath the surface, hidden in each of our solitary, late-night culinary pursuits. Instant ramen is the ultimate “meal of least resistance,” scarfed down at the kitchen counter between essays, or between parties. 

In his essay “Unzipping Mr. Rabbit,” Rob Percival writes about the way ultra-processed foods such as instant ramen disconnect us from traditional, tangible, and communal ways of preparing meals: “They are made for mindless consumption [….] We eat them alone or on the move. They are pre-prepared and pre-chewed.” 

Percival, in the end, decides to hunt and skin his own rabbits. While I don’t think my landlord would appreciate that, Percival’s ideas about taking time to physically prepare and give thanks for our food—and, crucially, to do this together—resonate with me. A well-planned soup can feed eight people for the cost of one UberEats delivery, and there’s no better place for a good conversation than over a simmering stew, with the snow falling outside and a cup of tea in your hand. 

Unfortunately, there’s no way to get around the fact that cooking takes money and time, and it is so easy to pay the 80 cents, take the five minutes, and eat in the dark, accompanied only by the glow of your half-written essay. 

In A Sand County Almanac, Wisconsin naturalist Aldo Leopold echoes Percival’s concern, writing, “There are two spiritual dangers in not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, and the other is that heat comes from the furnace.”

While I love Leopold, my midterm tomorrow morning precludes me from the noble labour of chopping my own firewood, and I fear that rent on a farm in the Plateau may be beyond my price range. The strange thing about our modern, industrialized context is that chopping your own firewood is a luxury, rather than a money-saving act of self-reliance. 

But I don’t think that’s the whole story: Cooking in community can drastically reduce the cost of groceries per person, while building bonds and strengthening social support networks at the same time. Three years of cooking for others in university has convinced me that it is not just an indulgence, but a necessary act of resistance in a society that pushes people to cook their instant noodles in three minutes, and eat them in two.

McGill, News, Recap

Recap: Alphonso F. Saville, IV reimagines colonial American Christianity in guest lecture

by Toby Izenberg on

More in McGill:

Alphonso F. Saville, IV, assistant professor of American Religious History at Union Presbyterian Seminary in Charlotte, North Carolina, delivered a talk on Feb. 18 titled “John Marrant’s Gospel: Reimagining Christianity in Colonial America.” Hosted by McGill’s Department of History and Classical Studies, the talk centred around research from Saville’s book, The Gospel of John Marrant: Conjuring Christianity in the Black Atlantic. The book is the first full-length study of Marrant, who was America’s first Black ordained minister. 

During the talk, Saville described Marrant’s life, writings, and missionary work, examining how he engaged with Christianity as both a tool for survival and a means of resistance. Saville also challenged conventional narratives surrounding early African-American religious history. Through literary and historical readings of Marrant’s autobiography, Saville drew connections between Marrant’s life story and its intersection between African and Protestant-European spiritual traditions and mythologies. Central to Saville’s argument was the notion of Conjure, a magico-religious tradition established by enslaved Africans in colonial North America. Saville explained that the pervasiveness of Conjure practices in early African-American religion exemplifies traditional African religions’ influences on early Black Christianity. 

“Early Black Christianity was shaped less by the doctrinal systems of Euro-American Protestantism and more by the rich and cosmological religions of west and central-west Africa,” Saville explained. “This African-rooted foundation is evident in the performative aspects of early Black worship, where prayer, song, and dance sermonizing often carried the cadence and intent of conjure rituals. Through these practices, congregants evoked spiritual powers to heal wounds, resist systemic violence, and enact justice.”

He cautioned against the tendency to approach transatlantic religious history primarily through Eurocentric frameworks. In doing so, he warned, one risks overlooking African American spiritual and social autonomy, as well as the profound African contributions to the religious development of the Americas.

“America’s religious history is not a monolith,” Saville said. “It is a tapestry, woven from many traditions, stories, and perspectives. Including these diverse voices enriches our understanding of the past and equips us to address the challenges with the present.”

As he concluded, Saville reflected on the lessons that can be drawn from Marrant’s gospel.

“[Marrant’s] story is not just a historical artifact,” Saville said. “It is a mirror, reflecting the ongoing struggle for justice and the creative ways people of faith continue to fight for their dignity and humanity.”

Editorial

Winter 2025 SSMU Referendum Endorsements

by Tribune Editorial Board on

More in Editorial:

The Tribune’s Editorial Board presents its endorsements for the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Winter 2025 referendum questions. Editors researched and discussed the questions before voting on each endorsement. These endorsements reflect a majority vote of the editorial board, with editors who have conflicts of interest abstaining from pertinent questions. 

Amendment to the Constitution – Section 1.3: Yes

If passed, this motion would revise the Constitution’s Preamble interpretation clause, shifting from describing the Preamble as an “integral part of the Constitution” to stating that the Preamble is not to be interpreted as obligating SSMU legally or contractually. Given past lawsuits based on petty interpretations of the Preamble’s language, SSMU is seeking to save legal fees and prevent the overuse of the Preamble as a tactic to hold the Society to an unrealistically high standard. While voters should be aware that this amendment reduces the Constitution to a procedural document, effectively removing any binding statement of purpose or intention from the document, The Tribune ultimately endorses a “Yes” vote for this motion due to its potential to free up SSMU’s time and funding for other projects.

Do you agree to the merge of the VP Sustainability and Operations with the VP Internal, saving the SSMU $43,000: Yes

If passed, this motion will remove the position of Vice-President (VP) Sustainability and Operations, saving the SSMU $43,000 CAD. The role’s responsibilities of Sustainability and Operations will be reallocated to the President and the VP internal, respectively. The position entails managing the use of space in the SSMU building. However, the Society found that its duties are redundant, with many of them overlapping with existing positions within the SSMU. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote for this motion as it will relieve pressure on the Executive Committee by reducing the financial resources needed to compensate Executive Officers, ultimately leaving extra funding for other initiatives.

Do you agree to making the VP Finance position into a hired position, focused on experience?: No

This motion aims to designate the VP Finance as a position hired by the Board of Directors instead of being elected through the same process as the other Executive Officers. This risks reducing student voices within the Executive Committee hiring process, opens up the possibility of the position remaining vacant, if membership does not approve of the appointee. Given low voter turnout in recent by-elections, The Tribune is not confident the position would be adequately filled. Furthermore, it would further decrease the number of elected candidates on the Board who are directly accountable to students, further hindering SSMU’s democratic process. The Tribune endorses a “No” vote to this amendment. 

SSMU DriveSafe Fee Increase: Yes

DriveSafe is a student-run SSMU service that provides free rides home for students from Thursday to Saturday. Throughout the years, they have driven thousands of students to their destinations. Another service offered in part by DriveSafe is SafeHome: An accompanying service that drives students from McLennan Library to their homes, typically during exam season. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to increase DriveSafe’s portion of the semesterly, non-opt-outable SSMU Safety Services Fee (SSSN) by $1.00 CAD, from $1.65 CAD to $2.65 CAD. The SSSN, which currently funds MSERT, DriveSafe, WALKSAFE, and the Sexual Assault Centre of the McGill Students Society, would thereby increase from $7.15 CAD to $8.15 CAD per semester. With a mission to protect students by offering safe and accessible rides home, this increase would help keep the program up with inflation, reduce wait times by renting more cars, offering free services during special events (such as Frosh, Carnival, and Science Games), and ideally transitioning to sustainable electric vehicles for the 2025-2026 academic year. Because of the importance of DriveSafe in helping students get home safely, as well as their goals for accessibility and sustainability,  The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote.

Francophone Affairs Fee Creation: Yes

If passed, the Francophone Affairs Committee (CAF) Fee Creation will introduce an opt-outable $0.50 CAD fee per semester, excluding Summer, to finance the francophone affairs of the SSMU. The CAF advocates for francophone students’ needs by facilitating the francophone community’s integration, promoting the French language and supporting French language-learning initiatives. SSMU currently allocates the CAF budget. The fee would allow the CAF to increase its efforts to support francophone students while providing funding to external groups whose activities are tied to the CAF’s mandates such as Centre d’Enseignement du français de McGill. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to implement this opt-outable fee as it will increase support for Francophone communities, enhancing accessibility for Francophone students and fostering linguistic inclusion. 

ELEVES DES CHAMPS ISG Fee Approval: Yes

If passed, the Élèves des Champs (EDC) ISG fee approval will introduce an opt-outable $1.25 CAD fee to support the student-run farm on the Macdonald campus. The farm grows over 50 types of vegetables with an emphasis on sustainability. EDC aims to partner with student groups like Midnight Kitchen to provide fresh produce for their meal services. The group has run a deficit in past years and relied on one-time donations from the Dean’s Office at Macdonald Campus. This fee would help the group sustainably operate and subsidize hourly wages for their workers. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to introduce this opt-outable fee as it will further promote sustainability on campus, may help with food insecurity, and create stable, educational, and career-helping summer job opportunities for students. 

TVM Fee Renewal: Yes

The TVM Fee Renewal proposal would extend the current opt-outable fee of $1.50 CAD per semester for all full-time and part-time students, beginning in Fall 2025 and ending in Winter 2030. If approved, the fee will remain unchanged. TVM is a student-run television and entertainment service that offers a range of free video production services—such as event coverage, promotional video production, and live streaming—to SSMU student groups and McGill-affiliated undergraduate organizations. It also provides free equipment rental and training for its general members. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to renew this opt-outable fee. TVM provides McGill students with technical film and television production skills that are not covered by university courses, and it helps keep costs low for other student clubs and organizations by providing video production services free of charge. Since the fee is both minimal and opt-outable, the financial impact on students is very low.

Indigenous Equity Fee Renewal: Yes

The Indigenous Equity Fee Renewal would extend the current non-opt-outable fee of $1.50 CAD per student per semester for both full- and part-time students. This fee goes toward three primary purposes: First, it funds the activities of the Students’ Society of McGill University’s Indigenous Affairs Committee. This committee works to increase visibility, representation, and services for Indigenous Students. Second, this fee funds student projects led by Indigenous student groups or Indigenous equity groups, thus investing in the success and expanded platform for McGill’s Indigenous students and affiliated projects. Third, this fee is a source of financial support for Indigenous undergraduate students at McGill to which any Indigenous student can apply for financial assistance for anything from groceries to school tuition. Further, the fee is minimal, making it a minor change to existing student fees. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to renew this non-opt-outable fee in support of McGill’s Indigenous student population. 

Menstrual Health Fee Renewal: YesIf passed, the Menstrual Health Fee would be renewed at a non-optoutable cost of $2.40 CAD per student per semester. The SSMU Menstrual Health Project stocks over 160 washrooms around campus with pads and tampons, distributes reusable products (including period underwear, reusable pads, menstrual cups, and menstrual discs), holds menstrual education events, and employs five students part-time. Last spring, they also began offering menstrual products in residences. The project is funded exclusively by the Menstrual Health Fee; as such, if the fee renewal fails to pass, the project will cease to function. The Tribune endorses a “Yes” vote to renew this non-optoutable fee, as the project promotes menstrual health, employs students, engages in sustainability initiatives, and provides an invaluable service to the student community as a whole, as menstrual products are essential items.

Science & Technology

Eating sustainably, one DISH at a time

by Antoine Larocque on

More in Science & Technology:

Given that around 26 per cent of mortality cases in Canada are attributable to dietary choices, and that the global food system is responsible for a third of global greenhouse gas emissions, researchers are exploring ways to balance nutritional value with sustainability. McGill scientists have recently developed a consumer-focused approach that could pave the way for improving both individual dietary habits and the sustainability of the broader food system.

Ebenezer M. Kwofie, an assistant professor in McGill’s Bioresource Engineering Department, and his collaborators developed Dashboard for Improving Sustainable Healthy (DISH) food choices—a digital application designed to guide consumers in making informed food purchases.

“The platform’s goal is to provide people with the information on nutrition and the environment, [so] they get to make a choice on what they want to buy,” Kwofie said in an interview with The Tribune. 

He also emphasized the importance of consumer autonomy. 

“We think that that is the first step in making that transition to a sustainable, healthy diet: Having a system that is not intrusive, having a platform that provides the information but still leaves the choice to the consumer is critical,” Kwofie said. 

Unlike other applications, DISH presents nutritional and environmental information in a way that is easy to understand. It employs a five-star scale and a red-green colour-coded rating system, ensuring that key information is presented at the time of purchase without requiring significant cognitive effort. 

“If we can provide a tool that people would engage in at the time they are making the decision, maybe we might have a better outcome,” Kwofie said.

Early findings support this idea. To evaluate the platform’s impact, Kwofie and his team recently conducted a study to evaluate how DISH influenced consumers’ choices at a cafeteria at the University of Arkansas. Participants received two meal options: A beef-based burger, rated as slightly healthy and unsustainable, or a plant-based burger, rated as moderately healthy and sustainable.

Among the 90.2 per cent of consumers who initially intended to buy a beef-based burger, 56.9 per cent reported a shift in purchasing intention in favour of the plant-based burger, with 83 per cent citing DISH’s environmental and nutritional information as the key factor influencing their decision. 

The results suggested that presenting clear, accessible information to consumers can effectively encourage healthier and more sustainable food choices.

“While the goal is not to make everybody move from animal to plant [diets], we believe that by providing the data […], if we can get more than half of the people to start thinking about what they are eating and how it influences their health, how it influences the environment, and if we can begin that discussion and make people even question their own choices, that’s a big win,” Kwofie commented. “Just wanting everybody to move is not realistic.”

The researchers hope to expand DISH beyond university cafeterias, ultimately aiming for implementation at provincial, municipal, and even national levels. In the meantime, they are refining the application based on user feedback and testing it with a broader menu and a more diverse range of participants. 

The team is currently testing an upgraded version of DISH at the Café TWIGS and The Ceilidh at McGill’s Macdonald Campus, as well as in off-campus locations such as supermarkets. They are also studying its effectiveness in Montreal across different age groups, including middle schoolers and older adults, and eventually hope to do the same in immigrant communities.

“If we can target even more young people and make [the environmental and nutritional information] in a form that they can understand […], we think that we might get a healthy eating culture in the near future, which is the target of this whole research,” Kwofie said.

Kwofie and his team aim to launch a McGill-wide version of the DISH application by Fall 2025. In the meantime, those interested in making healthier, more sustainable food choices can explore DISH for Research, another platform developed by the team, which is expected to be available later this winter semester.

McGill, News

Some students fear financial impact of Quebec government decision to end Perspective Scholarships Program early

by Olivia Ardito on

More in McGill:

On Feb. 7, the Quebec government announced that it is ending its Quebec Perspective Scholarship Program (PBPQ) earlier than expected, with the winter 2025 semester being the last semester to accept new applicants. The program that Premier François Legault initiated in November 2021 gave bursaries of $1,500-$2,500 CAD to students studying in fields with labour shortages, such as engineering and information technology. While no new recipients will be awarded, current recipients will continue receiving the scholarship through to the end of their studies.

The decision came as a surprise to some as the scholarship fund was set to end in the Fall 2025, and there remains $1 billion CAD devoted to funding it. 

Richard Rassokhine, B.S. ‘24, was a recipient of a Perspective Scholarship during his studies at McGill. In a written statement to The Tribune, Rassokhine explained that financial challenges and the increasing cost of living in Montreal meant that the scholarship was crucial in paying for his degree.

“My mother earned very little and I didn’t take internships during the summer so I had essentially no income outside of what the [Student Financial Assistance] AFE gave me. The Perspective bursary took an important weight off my chest essentially,” wrote Rassokhine. “Had I not received the bursary, I would have scraped by in some way, either taking a personal loan from my bank or borrowing money from relatives.”

Rassokhine also noted that he believes there is a significant lack of information from the government and educational institutions about how to apply for funding, such as the Perspective Scholarship, adding to students’ financial difficulties.

The McGill Media Relations Office (MRO) wrote that while the government’s decision could have financial consequences for students, the university does not believe it will harm its international standing. 

“The elimination of student funding opportunities is never welcome news,” the MRO wrote. “Newly admitted students who can no longer try for PBPQ funding are encouraged to apply for Quebec’s government aid program. McGill also has need-based aid programs to supplement government aid.”

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President External Hugo-Victor Solomon explained to The Tribune/ that he feels this is yet another recent instance of the government creating additional financial pressure for students, especially in light of recent tuition increases for out-of-province and international students. 

“To say we’re disappointed in the Ministry of Education is an understatement,” Solomon wrote. “This is another example of the Quebec government prioritizing austerity over accessibility at the expense of students, further reducing investment in education and student well-being.”

Solomon highlighted that funding cuts at the provincial level have ripple effects across the university system as a whole. He acknowledged “the frustration and uncertainty” that the government’s decision will bring, and encouraged students to email him with thoughts or concerns.

“I will also remain in contact with student leaders at other universities to coordinate a united response,” Solomon wrote. “This fight isn’t over. The government cannot continue balancing its budget on the backs of students, and we will push for better solutions.”

1 … 81 82 83 84 85 … 1,364

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue