Latest News

Student Life, Student of the Week

Student of the Week: Aya

In February of 2025, following the completion of her honours-level Bachelor’s degree in clinical nutrition in Gaza, Aya was admitted to McGill’s M.Sc. thesis program in Human Nutrition. Now, a year later, she remains trapped in Gaza, unable to provide the necessary biometric data to complete her application. 

Because of limited border crossings in Gaza under Israel’s genocide and the lack of a visa application centre (VAC) in Palestine, Aya was forced to defer her admission to McGill to the Winter 2026 semester, and then again to the Fall 2026 semester. With the former now well underway, she has yet to receive the support she needs to provide her biometrics. This would result in a third deferral, after which she will lose her offer of admission. 

“This opportunity [to attend McGill] represents years of hard work finally being recognized,” Aya said in an interview with The Tribune

Aya is one of 130 Palestinian students who have been accepted into Canadian universities but remain barred from travel to begin their studies; 70 of these students, like Aya, are trapped in Gaza even after the ceasefire, while 30 have evacuated to Egypt.

The biometric requirement that holds Aya in Gaza has already been circumvented by a number of countries—including the United Kingdom, France, and Ireland. These countries have all established programs to either evacuate students to Egypt or Jordan to obtain biometrics, or to waive the biometric requirement entirely, with the understanding that students in Gaza face exceptional circumstances and cannot be held to standard visa stipulations. In 2022, under this same logic, Canada—rightfully—waived the biometric requirement for some Ukrainians fleeing Russia’s war in their country. The same support has not been extended to Palestinian students.

“I know students who got scholarships from other countries and [have] been evacuated and started their degrees, but there’s [still] no action [from the] Canadian government to help us get evacuated from Gaza,” Aya said. 

While awaiting political action from the Canadian federal government and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), Aya is working full-time as a nutrition officer with an international non-governmental organization (NGO). 

Though the famine has subsided, malnutrition persists in the Gaza Strip as food remains expensive and insufficient—a scarcity created and upheld by Israel’s continued restriction of food supplies into the region. Her days involve supporting malnutrition screening, food distribution, and medical treatment, while her evenings are spent taking independent online courses to supplement her work. 

“Living in Gaza, we continue to struggle under extremely difficult conditions, as there is still severe food insecurity [….] A lot of children and pregnant, lactating women are malnourished. The struggling is still the same,” Aya explained. “Even when food enters Gaza, prices remain extremely high, converted to before the genocide, and most families have no source of income.” 

From Aya’s nutritional perspective, the food in Gaza is not just deficient in quantity, but also in quality. 

“Even what enters Gaza is for commercial use, a lot of snacks, a lot of […] energy drinks,” Aya said. “It’s not high-quality food, [like] vegetables and fruits, to resolve the malnutrition impact in children, in elderly people.”

In Gaza, expertise in clinical nutrition like Aya’s saves lives. By failing to facilitate Aya’s education and research at McGill, the Canadian government and IRCC are denying a lifeline to those in Gaza, where Aya plans to return after her studies. 

“These delays affect far more than one individual future,” Aya said. “When opportunities like these are lost, the impact extends to [the] entire community, as my goal has always been to return and help my community in Gaza.”

For Palestinian scholars in Gaza today, education is not so much a personal undertaking as it is an imperative responsibility to their Palestinian homeland and those who remain in it. 

“That’s why we are looking for this opportunity,” Aya said. “It’s not a choice. It’s mandatory to have a good education.”

The future of Gaza lies in academic expertise capable of rebuilding from the ground up. 

“Supporting our ability to study,” Aya said, referring to all prospective Palestinian students and scholars, “is also an investment in the future recovery and resilience of our community.”

Science & Technology

How systemic barriers hinder the integration of African immigrants in Quebec’s labour market

Immigrants contribute significantly to Canada’s socioeconomic growth in undeniable ways, yet many of them are excluded from job opportunities for reasons unrelated to their qualifications. A complex interplay of racial discrimination, social isolation, and systemic inequalities shapes the experiences of Highly Skilled African Immigrants (HSAIs) joining the workforce. This raises a pressing question: Despite arriving with strong educational backgrounds and adequate training, why do HSAIs remain so alienated from the labour market?

In a recent publication in the Journal of International Migration and Integration, Jacob Kwakye, a PhD candidate in McGill’s School of Social Work, examined the experiences of HSAIs in the Quebec labour market. He hopes his findings can shed light on the systemic racism Black communities face and inform policy-making moving forward.

“[The] majority of the findings in the study had to do with racial perception,” Kwakye said in an interview with The Tribune. “Although Canada is doing its best and Quebec has a lot of policies in place that try to address issues of racism, there are still certain issues that are perpetuating these kinds of perceptions.”

Kwakye’s study interviewed 16 participants using a qualitative approach, intentionally focusing on those who spoke different languages, held a Bachelor’s degree or higher from a Canadian or African university, and had lived in Quebec for three or more years.

“We’re just trying to look at meaningful narratives, and to be able to get those, you need to reduce the sample size in order to get in-depth knowledge from your participants,” Kwakye explained.

While language barriers were shown to play a role in HSAIs’ reduced ability to gain employment, racial biases held a more significant influence: Racism usually overrides language proficiency in the decision to hire HSAIs.

“The issues of language [as a barrier] also came up because, for the Quebecois context, the language is predominantly French. [The] majority of the participants stated that yes, language is a concern, but it does not supersede issues of racial perception.”

Kwakye also discussed how having a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree still puts them at a disadvantage when looking for work.

“They feel that they are more overqualified [than what the job demands] and that employers feel that because of their higher qualifications, they will not be able to engage them at the workplace,” Kwakye said. “So it’s either you need to reduce your qualifications in order to match the portfolio that is being advertised, or you must hide some of your qualifications to be able to be considered for a particular position.”

The study also revealed that the labour market favours the skills of those with local roots—an upsetting yet unsurprising finding given that it has always been easier for individuals born in Quebec to integrate into the workforce.

“When [HSAIs] are not able to conform and don’t understand the cultural dynamics, they will not be able to fit into these workplaces,” Kwakye said.

Kwakye also highlighted a participant’s experience in the workplace, where biases, racial discrimination, and assumptions about cultural competence directly affected HSAIs’ professional credibility.

“One lawyer said that sometimes some of the Quebecois clients felt unsafe to bring their matters to them or felt that they would not be the best person to help solve their problem, because they perceive [HSAIs] to not understand the Quebec context.”

As Quebec continues to rely on immigration to address employment shortages, Kwakye’s study highlights the contradiction of Quebec’s labour market—a system rooted in discrimination, perpetuated by systemic barriers, yet dependent on immigrant talent. 

Addressing these dynamics is important to create awareness and influence policy-making that does not disadvantage Black communities. Moreover, creating more equitable hiring practices and recognizing foreign credentials as valuable is a critical step to help prevent HSAIs’ exclusion from the workforce. 

McGill, Montreal, News

Indigenous justice workshop explores Indigenous rights and activism in the Americas

McGill Faculty of Law’s Centre for Human Rights & Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) hosted a workshop titled “Revitalization of Indigenous Justice in the Americas” over Zoom on Thursday, Jan. 29. The event featured three speakers active in Indigenous rights advocacy, including attorney Elizabeth Olvera Vásquez, McGill BCL/JD candidate Tarek Maussili, and Peruvian grassroots organizer Elsa Merma Ccahua

The event explored the meaning of justice for Indigenous Peoples in the Americas, with a focus on community responsibility, the relationship between land and life, and collective repair. The speakers examined how these concepts exist in the context of marginalization, capitalism, and land dispossession, with an emphasis on current Indigenous efforts to challenge these systems of power. 

Vásquez began the discussion by emphasizing the importance of Indigenous communities being familiar with their family origins and history. She explained that, through an understanding of family history, Indigenous people can more effectively integrate into their communities.   

“It is important [for Indigenous people] to know that their children are part of the community itself, because they know [their family] background will imply responsibility in a determined moment,” Vásquez said. “So it is important to know where to find that.”

Maussili continued the talk by criticizing Canadian society’s treatment of Indigenous Peoples, using his childhood as an example of the country’s historic and continuous erasure of Indigenous cultures and identities.

“Being Indigenous in Canada was never a good thing up until 2015 or 2016. I went through high school and I finished around 2015 and I remember being Indigenous was the most horrible experience,” Maussili said. “You’re treated as subhuman. You’re not treated with respect, and this is still the case today. Justice means reclaiming our identities and reclaiming our strength as a people. We’re losing our position in this country as Indigenous people from our respective nations. This is the goal of Canada, to assimilate our people, to dispossess us of our lands.”

He expressed the need for the younger generation of Indigenous people to get involved in activism, stressing the vitality of broader action against Canada’s attitude towards Indigenous rights. 

“Getting the youth active is something that I would like to see for our people,” Maussili said. “When I was in Peru, I saw the youth and all the young activists getting involved in protesting against the government and asserting their rights, and that sort of thing is what we need to see here in Canada [….] You can still clearly see that it’s not in Canada’s best interest to assert or to respect Aboriginal rights and titles. The future doesn’t really look good for us if we continue down this path.”

Ccahua spoke next, underlining the central role of land and territory in holding Indigenous communities together in the face of corporate advancement.

“We have been fighting with a mining company for many years,” Ccahua said. “I belong to an impacted and affected community, and we have a very long history. For our people, justice is defending [our] territory, water, and life. We live in a productive community that lives off the [land], and [our people] see those products as capital for their daily living and for supporting their families.”

She concluded the workshop by stressing the role of Indigenous activism as a tool for autonomy against governmental agendas of cultural assimilation.  

“In spite of all of the negative [experiences] our communities have gone through, I strongly believe that something that continues to be very present is resistance and the ways of resistance in which communities have found their own political [and] judicial strategies,” Ccahua said. “Why speak about Indigenous justice? It enhances the self-determination and autonomy of Indigenous Peoples.”

Montreal, News

MAW hosts roundtable discussing Bill 94’s violation of human rights

On Jan. 27, Muslim Awareness Week (MAW) hosted a roundtable on the dangers to civil liberties that Bill 94—passed in October 2025—would bring. 

Quebec lawmakers allege that Bill 94 is intended to reinforce secularism in the Quebec education system and bring several legislative reforms. The bill requires any worker providing services to students, as well as students themselves, to keep their faces uncovered within public or private institutions, and to refrain from wearing any visible religious symbols. This restriction does not apply to coverings worn for medical reasons or by people with disabilities.

The author of the bill, former education minister for the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) Bernard Drainville, argues that these measures are meant to promote Quebecois and democratic values such as gender equality and a secular state.

The roundtable convened at the Centre communautaire de loisir de la Côte-des-neiges and was composed of three panellists: Ligue des droits et libertés Coordinator Laurence Guénette, Professor of Law at the Université de Québec à Montréal (UQÀM) Ndeye Dieynaba Ndiaye, and UQÀM Political Science Master’s student Nour Amjahdi. The panel was overseen by MAW President and Co-Founder Samira Laouni

Laouni began by acknowledging the ninth anniversary of the Jan. 29 mass shooting at the Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec City, emphasizing the importance of fighting Islamophobia. She then introduced the main concern with Bill 94, noting that it excludes Muslim women from working in the public sector, given that many of them choose to wear hijabs for religious and cultural reasons. 

“While pushing the fundamental value of gender equality, [the government] is violating the right to work of certain women,” Laouni said. “How can gender equality be achieved without the financial independence of women?”

Laouni then passed the microphone to Guénette, who began with an assessment of the Quebec government’s actions since the Act respecting the laicity of the State (Bill 21) was passed in 2019. She noted that Bill 94 expands the restrictions of Bill 21, and adds to the existing violations of certain marginalized groups’ rights. 

“The religious neutrality of the state [is] meant to allow everyone to practice their religion freely without fear of compromising their convictions and with respect to the right to equality,” Guénette stated.

She continued by explaining that the CAQ adopted Bills 21 and 94 despite opposition from several feminist and human rights organizations. She also noted that the restrictions on face coverings in Bill 94 represented flagrant violations of both the Canadian and Quebec Charters of Rights and Freedoms. Guénette ended by warning that the CAQ’s use of the notwithstanding clause to override constitutional protections should worry everyone in society. 

Next, Amjahdi discussed how she was directly impacted by the ban on face coverings. After Bill 21 was passed, she could no longer teach music as she had intended. More recently, she lost her job leading a children’s choir because of Bill 94. 

“It was very violent,” Amjahdi said.  “I was quite lost and my life turned upside down. I felt that my identity was shaken. This law put an end to my musical identity.”

Amjahdi explained that, despite being a product of the Quebec francophone school system, she now questions her identity as a Quebecoise. She concluded by calling for allies of the Muslim community to join them in protesting these bills. 

Dieynaba Ndiaye, the fourth panellist, discussed the importance of speaking out against constitutional injustices.

“In certain societies [like Quebec], filing grievances has an important moral value. We must do it when rights are violated in Quebec,” Dieynaba Ndiaye affirmed. “We have the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse.”

According to Dieynaba Ndiaye, Bill 94, along with several other pieces of legislation, represents a rupture of this social contract. 

“It’s very important [to understand] that people come here with competencies, with experience,” Dieynaba Ndiaye said. “People choose Quebec just as Quebec chooses people.”

*All quotes were translated from French.

McGill, Montreal, News, PGSS, SSMU

PGSS members lose access to Free Lunches Program

On Jan. 19, the Students’ Society of McGill (SSMU) revoked Post Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) members’ access to the Free Lunches Program. This decision follows PGSS executives opting out of the meal fee, which previously went towards the now-closed Midnight Kitchen (MK), but since closure has gone towards the program. Postgraduates previously paid $2 CAD per student per term, while undergraduates pay $8 CAD. 

In a written exchange with The Tribune, the PGSS executive team declined to comment on the motivation behind their decision to suspend the fee or the state of ongoing negotiations.

SSMU President Dymetri Taylor explained in an interview with The Tribune that discussions between the two student societies led to the suspension of the fee, stating that PGSS felt they should have been consulted in the decision to close MK. 

According to Taylor, PGSS cited the change in structure from MK to the new Free Lunches Program as their reason for suspending the fee. PGSS executives informed McGill of this decision. In response, the university responded that PGSS executives could not unilaterally decide to opt-out without their members’ say-so. This led to a compromise wherein PGSS would not collect the fee until May 18, when the results of a referendum moving to permanently suspend the meal fee are announced. 

“Because there was a reorganization planned for that service, for the provision of meals to be increased and continue to be provided, the SSMU at the time believed that there was no incentive to reach out to PGSS about it. It’s a change of the service, but it’s not a removal of it,” Taylor said. “So, [the PGSS] had a meeting with the [SSMU] executives, in which case they had a riveting discussion to say the very least. And there was certainly some interesting perspective shared by PGSS regarding Midnight Kitchen and the reorganization, so that has led to them wanting to remove the fee in general.”

Upon learning of PGSS’s final decision to suspend the fee, Taylor put forward a motion during the Jan. 15 Legislative Council meeting to restrict PGSS members’ access to the program and the SSMU food pantry. He stated that it is in the best interest of undergraduate students to stop subsidizing the cost of free lunches without a contribution from PGSS. The motion was passed unanimously. However, SSMU Vice-President (VP) External Seraphina Crema-Black later proposed an amendment to allow PGSS members to retain access to the food pantry until the referendum results are announced.  

Crema-Black explained the motivation behind this amendment at the Jan. 20 Board of Directors meeting, stating that discussions with PGSS Secretary-General Sheheryar Ahmed and SSMU’s in-house council led her to believe a compromise was reachable.

“I want to know whether that’s something that they would consider before we pull access, especially because it’s used disproportionately by PGSS members, and food insecurity is a very important issue,” Crema-Black said. “I think I will be doing right by the company in my capacity as VP External, knowing that we’ve been talking to PGSS.”

An email motion granted the amendment, allowing PGSS members to continue accessing the food pantry for the remainder of the Winter 2026 semester. 

Students are now mandated to provide McGill identification proving that they are undergraduates before accessing the Free Lunches Program. If the motion to annul the fee fails, postgraduate students will again have access to these services but will have to pay an $8 CAD per-semester fee in order to match the contributions made by SSMU members. 

Taylor told The Tribune that removing PGSS access to the daily free lunches is the required course of action until the referendum, as the program will have less funding due to the executives’ decision to suspend their fee. Without funding from PGSS, the program cannot serve as many students as it does currently.

“[The PGSS executives] believe that it is better that no fee should exist and that their students should not have access to a meal service that’s recurring every day of the week, […] especially because the PGSS has no plans to institute any food accessible initiatives of their own at the present time,” Taylor said. “And now it’s up to their members to decide what is better, what is worse.”

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

Tolstoy transformed: McGill’s Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society’s immersive ‘Great Comet’ shines

From Jan. 24 to Jan. 31, the McGill Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society (AUTS) staged Natasha, Pierre, and the Great Comet of 1812, a musical originally created by Dave Malloy, as their annual performance. The show reinterprets a 70-page excerpt of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace, set in 19th-century Moscow, as the characters experience love, jealousy, heartbreak, familial obligation, and societal expectations. AUTS director Milan Miville-Dechene explains that even though the story spans 200 years, the musical explores themes that remain deeply relevant.

The show follows the countess Natasha (Claire Latella, U1 Music) and her cousin Sonya (Miranda De Luca, U3 Education) as they arrive in Moscow, awaiting the return of Prince Andrey Bolkonsky (Chris Boensel, U2 Arts), Natasha’s fiancé, who has been sent off to war. One night at the opera, the rogue Anatole (Frank Willer, U1 Science) sweeps Natasha off her feet. Convinced they are in love, Natasha breaks off her engagement and makes plans to elope with the charming Anatole, whom she has known for just a few days. When others discover their plans, Pierre (Sam Synders, U4 Arts), Andrey’s best friend, steps in to prevent the disaster. 

Théâtre Plaza was the perfect venue for this show, with its moody, atmospheric lighting and spacious interior. The actors used the balcony and floor as part of the set, physically and metaphorically engrossing the audience in the story. The lighting reflected the musical’s numbers distinctively—when the characters were partying at the club, the lights switched to green and purple, reminiscent of hazy modern clubbing. 

Natasha, Pierre, and the Great Comet of 1812 embodies the most extravagant and outlandish aspects of musical theatre, perhaps most notably by constantly breaking the fourth wall, made easier thanks to the confines of the intimate venue. 

From the first musical number, “Prologue,” the cast interacts directly with the audience by making eye contact and chanting the lyrics “Gonna have to study up a little bit / If you wanna keep with the plot / ‘Cause it’s a complicated Russian novel / Everyone’s got nine different names / So look it up in your program.” Complete with designated interactive seating, a few audience members were brought up to the stage and spun by various characters. 


Some cast members elaborated on how they connected with audience members and handled the show’s fourth-wall breaks.

“It’s definitely intimidating because […] I love to connect with a scene partner, so having to connect with an audience member who is like ‘I’m not in this right now’ is definitely different, but so much fun,” De Luca said in the interview with The Tribune.

Later, maracas were handed to attendees, inviting them to join the live orchestra. The setting and the story are removed from modernity, a fact the musical itself embraces, blending story and reality and enticing the audience to join the colourful world of Moscow.

The cast’s performances were also remarkable for their ages. Latella dazzled with her singing, especially in her solo “No One Else.” Complemented by her dynamic acting, she brought the wide-eyed, romantic young girl to life. Though Mary, Andrey’s sister, is a relatively minor character, Ariel Goldberg (U0, Arts) conveys Mary with her abusive father’s impossible whims through vocal performance, imbued with a slow, mournful quality. Mary and Natasha’s dissonant harmony in “Natasha & Bolkonskys” perfectly conveys their apprehension and clash of personalities. Willer, on the other hand, exudes Anatole’s effortless charm and suavity from his first moment on stage, making the audience feel Natasha’s immediate infatuation. 

Ryan Jacoby’s (U1, Science) performance as Dolokhov embodies what made this musical so special. The delicate balance between the fun, theatrical humour and the grounded dramatic emotions epitomizes the quick-witted humour of the show. 

The company numbers were among the most impressive, featuring elaborate choreography, precise synchronization, and stellar vocal harmonies from the entire cast. The ensemble was integrated into the musical, with their presence—or absence—noticeable in the musical numbers. With the entire company on stage, it was easy to feel the chemistry among the cast, which translated into a natural camaraderie among their characters.

Off the Board, Opinion

A love letter to ‘Tribune’ haters

Content warning: Mention of The Tribune and its absolutely horrible takes

I cannot count on one hand the number of times I’ve mentioned that I’m an editor at The Tribune, only to receive an eyeroll. In fact, there is a Reddit discussion post that affectionately calls our paper the “least terrible of the bunch.” I get it: If you think The Tribune isn’t perfect, I can assure you that you’re not alone. Whether you fall asleep at night dreaming of our next issue, or you walk past our newspaper stands on campus muttering something PG-13, I must thank you—at least you’re paying attention.

A campus paper that only affirms what you already believe or want to believe is not a newspaper, but a propaganda machine. The Tribune exists to challenge and question the status quo. Even if you don’t agree with us, your criticism sharpens our perspective, and your hostility does not derail us from continuing to write and uncover unspoken injustices.

Nonetheless, this doesn’t stop some from criticizing us for being ‘selectively aware,’ that we care loudly about some issues while staying silent on others. But I implore you to consider: We have, usually, 27 pieces to publish in print every week. Every issue is a matter of editorial judgement. To select one story over another is the nature of journalism, not ignorance toward other injustices. 

We must choose carefully what we cover if we want to maximize our leverage in the community. While geographical distance does not make global injustices matter any less, The Tribune’s inherent job is to cover stories of interest and impact to the McGill community. When we write about McGill’s complicity in Israel’s genocide in Palestine, it’s because we know the student empire has the power to influence institutional behaviour. When we write about McGill’s inadequate efforts in reconciliation, it’s because we recognize our paper has the power to inform students about McGill’s lacklustre initiatives.

And when we receive your criticism, it urges us to reconsider our journalistic angle. Not only does your attention direct us to what the community cares about, it informs us of where our coverage succeeds and where it falls short. This way, we can sharpen our lens and take responsibility for our choices.

And then comes the accusation that we are a biased paper. There’s no disagreement there—bias is a prerequisite to journalism. Stories carry perspective, perspective carries judgement, and judgement contains bias. The Tribune is inherently biased, and so are other media outlets—even if they claim honest reporting.

There is no unbiased reporting. We are biased, and we are proud of it. As a matter of fact, our Anti-Oppressive Mandate clearly states that “we centre anti-oppression in our coverage, our editorials, our hiring, and our workplace practices.” But this is more than a badge we wear; it is a commitment to holding ourselves accountable to readers. Our mandate demands ongoing reflection, compassion, and a willingness to recognize that harmful biases exist—and that our paper strives not to perpetrate those biases through our words, or replicate them through the stories we choose to platform. Our mandate is a responsibility, not just a slogan.

Now you may ask, whose side are we on? The truth is, we don’t glorify anyone or anything for that matter. But we do stand with those who have been silenced or sidelined. Those that the mainstream media institutions have neglected or ignored. Those who were systemically oppressed. And, cliché or not, history is—after all—his story. It is up to us journalists to disrupt this narrative and make it their story—by listening, reporting, and frontlining accountability.

If you have made it this far, I would like to seize the chance, one last time, to say thank you, from the bottom of my heart. Loving The Tribune doesn’t require agreeing with every headline—I know I don’t. It doesn’t entail trying to out-woke everyone. Loving The Tribune simply means caring enough to stay engaged.

After all, we are a newspaper, not a dictatorship. We didn’t ask for unconditional agreement, just engagement.

Out on the Town, Student Life

Must-try Black owned restaurants in Montreal

As we celebrate Black History Month, it is important to recognize the vast ways to support and uplift the Black community in Montreal, not just in February, but year-round. One way is to explore the cuisine of Montreal’s many fantastic, diverse, Black-owned restaurants.  With this in mind, The Tribune has curated a non-exhaustive list of Black-owned restaurants to kickstart an exploration into all that Montreal has to offer. 

Lloydie’s

Lloyd Tull first opened Lloydie’s in the early 1990s, bringing Caribbean flavours and his famous Jamaican patties to the Quebec culinary scene. While Lloydie’s has since greatly expanded, it remains a family-owned Montreal institution. Today, the restaurant is managed by Tull’s son, Nathan, alongside his childhood friend Julian Chemtov. Taste classic Caribbean delicacies at two locations, one in Saint-Henri, and the other in the core of the Mile End. Their menu is simple but classic: Plantains, oxtail, and jerk chicken. Try their jerk chicken poutine for a delicious fusion of Quebecois and Caribbean flavours. And if you can’t get enough of Lloydie’s classic Jamaican patties, find them frozen in a series of local grocery stores

Restaurant Queen Sheba

If there is anything students yearn for in the depths of Montreal winter, it’s a warm family-style meal. Find respite and cure homesickness with a trip to Restaurant Queen Sheba for a nourishing Ethiopian meal. Located at the intersection of av. du Parc and av. du Mont-Royal with a range of vegan options and an array of braised and stewed meats, Queen Sheba has something for everyone. Enjoy one of their many shared tasting menus that blend vegan and non-vegan options, and connect with others in the most rewarding way—over a warm meal.

Chef Paul Toussaint

The culinarily diverse Time Out Market is home to an authentic Haitian restaurant, Chef Paul Toussaint, named after its founder,  Paul Toussaint. Find shelter from the Montreal winter there with the tastes of corn, yuzu, and lime—all found in a fresh ceviche for $16 CAD. If seafood isn’t your fare of choice, try their griot sandwich or goat curry. A mere 5-minute walk from McGill’s downtown campus, escape to the tropics by treating yourself to an elevated lunch out in between lectures. Once hooked on Toussaint’s cooking, check out one of his other restaurants scattered throughout downtown Montreal and Little Italy.

Kwizinn

Kwizinn Vieux-Montreal is in the heart of old Montreal, offering a fusion of classic Caribbean flavours and modern culinary methods for a menu that is both authentic and innovative. Order their octopus carpaccio, served on a bed of grilled guacamole and topped with a habanero and ginger sauce, to truly appreciate their creativity. In addition to dinner, Kwizinn offers brunch on the weekends, jazz nights every Thursday from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m., and a late-night DJ on Saturdays and Sundays. Kwizinn is also home to a not-so-secret speakeasy that’s available for private events, and is awaiting the opening of a food truck in April 2026.  

Le Virunga
A previously recommended Tribune pick, Le Virunga brings vibrant Congolese cuisine to the table with fresh Quebec produce. Chef Maria-José de Frias and her daughter Zoya have built an intimate and delicious restaurant where Congolese spices produce the ultimate Montreal fine-dining experience. For a mouth-watering meal, start with the seared walleye fillet that comes with mashed cassava and an eggplant mousse, and try the guinea fowl leg confit as your main. Le Virguna was a 2025 Michelin guide pick, and features a 100 per cent South African wine list. While a more expensive option, Le Virguna is certain to provide an unforgettable culinary experience.

Commentary, Opinion

Without race-based data, racial inequities in youth protection persist

In November 2025, the McGill School of Social Work published a study examining racial disparities in child welfare interventions across Canada, finding that Black children were investigated for maltreatment at 2.27 times the rate of white children. When researchers matched cases with similar clinical and socioeconomic profiles, out-of-home placement rates were twice as high for Black children as for their white counterparts. 

Existing data has posited that the overrepresentation of Black families in child welfare interventions reflects structural inequalities. Researchers note that poverty and its associated factors are the primary drivers of out-of-home placement, and with Black Canadians experiencing disproportionately high rates of poverty, they argue that racial disparities in interventions merely reflect the impact of systemic racism on socioeconomic status. However, these disparities cannot be explained by poverty alone. 

Child welfare practices have systematically targeted Black families through biased decision-making, over-policing, and heightened surveillance of Black families. Existing risk assessment tools have failed to account for differences in parenting styles between families, revealing a profound racial bias embedded within national child protection systems. Yet, these findings do not include Quebec, as the province does not collect or publicly release comparable race-based data on child welfare practices.

Quebec’s failure to make race-based data publicly available limits the province’s ability to identify and respond to potential disparities in its youth protection system. Without race-based data, the youth protection system is shielded from accountability, dangerously obscuring the racial inequities faced by Black children and their families. 

In the context of a system that holds the power to separate families and inflict lasting trauma, race-based data is crucial to understanding the over-policing of Black families within our province’s youth protection systems. Quebec’s failure to collect accessible, race-based child welfare data has slowed down that initiative, forcing professionals and scholars to rely solely on data collected at the national level, namely, the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS). This negligence creates a significant and alarming information gap. The absence of disaggregated data on racialized communities makes it impossible to accurately assess how racial bias impacts the overrepresentation of Black youth in the Canadian child welfare system.

This is not the first time Quebec has demonstrated inconsistency in addressing race-based issues and youth protection. In 2021, the Quebec government conducted an evaluation of child welfare systems across the province, with its final report revealing that Black children account for approximately 30 per cent of children in the youth protection system, despite only representing 15 per cent of the population. The report emphasized that this statistical phenomenon could be attributed to social workers’ biases, calling upon the government to address racism within the system. However, years after the report was issued, most of its recommendations remained incomplete or inconsistently applied. Of the report’s 65 recommendations, the Commission spéciale sur les droits des enfants et la protection de la jeunesse found that only one has been fully implemented. 

Addressing how over-policing shapes youth protection interventions involving Black families requires more than collecting and releasing disaggregated child welfare data. It also requires the acknowledgment of systemic racism in youth protection and responses through concrete reforms. These measures may include meaningful partnerships and collaborations with community organizations to better understand the lived experiences of the targeted families, instituting anti-bias training for social workers, and implementing the recommendations from expert committees such as Quebec’s Commission spéciale.

Until Quebec fully confronts systemic racism as a central driver of Black children’s overrepresentation in the youth protection system and starts collecting and disaggregating data at the provincial level, it cannot credibly claim a commitment to addressing structural racial inequities. Meaningful action must be informed by transparent data and guided by the experiences of the communities most affected.

Prof Profiles, Science & Technology

Professor Myrna Lashley sheds light on the importance of studying Black Canadian youth’s mental health

Black Canadians, on average, experience disproportionately poor health outcomes throughout their lives. While genetics may contribute to many chronic illnesses and mental health challenges, social and environmental determinants such as limited access to health care and anti-Black racism drive much of this disparity. This discrepancy is compounded by the legacy of colonialism and medical racism, which leaves Black communities underrepresented in mental health research.

To explore how these inequities affect youth mental health, The Tribune spoke with Myrna Lashley, an associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and adjunct researcher at the Culture and Mental Health Research Unit of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

While researching youth mental health, Lashley noticed that Black youth often carry a profound burden of intergenerational trauma relating to racism while also having to navigate structural racism, shaping how they see themselves.

“Structural racism is based on ideology,” Lashley said. “It’s in our laws, in the way we interact with each other, even in the way we teach religion, in the arts, and cultures, everything, and we have to be very conscious to set things so that Black youth see things that value them as citizens in the Canadian mosaic.” 

These systemic pressures also bleed into Black youth’s educational environments. Schools’ anti-violence policies often define violence as solely physical rather than emotional. This results in disciplinary action being taken only against students who respond physically to racial bullying, ignoring the harm caused by racist language. Teachers may also dismiss racist comments or fail to document incidents, leaving frustrated students to undermine their self-worth and sometimes reshape their perceptions of mental health practitioners.


“Anti-violence policy is used against that child, who responded to violence that they have been suffering all along, because violence is often seen only as a physical thing and not as an emotional thing,” Lashley explained. “When you are young, you tend to look at everybody almost the same. So how do you say to somebody, ‘Let’s go and get you some mental health remedies,’ when the person who is going to help you looks like the person that you are angry at?”

Lashley highlighted several persistent barriers in accessing mental health care in Canada for youth, stemming from systemic bias to a lack of culturally competent care and adequately trained professionals. 

“We don’t have enough people who understand the issues [.…] You still have people even to this day, who [incorrectly] think that Black people don’t feel pain to the same extent as white people,” Lashley explained. “There are barriers to care in terms of knowledge, there are barriers to care in terms of […] therapists taking racism into the therapy room with them. Have they done the reflection that’s necessary to look at their own privilege?”

In order to offer appropriate mental health resources to Black youth, professionals must recognize their privilege and understand how Black youths are affected by their lived experiences.

“How do you help someone when you already determined that they are genetically flawed as a group? […] You’ve made up your mind that they are aggressive […] You send that kid on the road to difficult mental health issues.”

These barriers often put the onus on Black youth to educate their caregivers or mental health practitioners about their lived experiences, which can discourage them from seeking care. The underrepresentation of Black service providers also leads to lower medical school enrolments within Black communities.

“We’re still in the process of trying to train people to understand not only the lived reality of Black people and therefore […] Black youth, but what effect this has on mental health,” Lashley said. “Because if you feel like you are going to see someone who doesn’t understand you, […] you are spending a bit of money in your first few sessions […] teaching people how to see you. We have to really make sure that when we train people who are working in mental health and are going to help others, that they have a better understanding [of this reality].”

Cultural stigma within Black communities adds another layer of difficulty. 

“[There is] stigma within the community, and how we deal with, as Black people, […] mental health, and mental illness. And we are ashamed to have it, so we tend often not to seek the care that’s necessary, and so our youth don’t do it, because we’re not encouraging them to do it.”

Lashley also emphasized how adults’ lack of access to mental health services can create familial and environmental issues that harm children. 

“People have to deal with racism in the workplace, and they don’t know how to confront it there, or they have to put food on the table, […] then they go home, and they take it out on the family. The kids get hit, or the partner gets hit, or the person starts to self-medicate with alcohol or drugs,” she said. 

With these factors in mind, Lashley shared how she sensitizes professionals and the public to Black mental health through her work.

“I talk with my colleagues, I try not to get angry […] If I’m angry, they don’t hear me [….] When I go to the court, this is what I do: I go to the judge, I give them a history of racism in Canada, not the United States [….] I will talk about it here,” she said.

This ignorance comes from many not knowing their history, placing the burdens of education, which stem from systemic factors, on Black communities themselves. 

“A lot of Canadians don’t know their history. And so, I approach it from that perspective and […] have them understand their history so they can understand why […] some Black people don’t trust them. We have to teach our kids that, so that they know how to protect themselves, not to hate you, but for them to protect themselves, and that’s something you don’t have to do with your kids [.…] I get them to address their privilege,” Lashley explained.

Medical and educational institutions also have a role to play in addressing systemic inequities, as they impact not only Black communities but also Indigenous, disabled, and other marginalized populations in various ways. This makes inclusion important in all spheres of life.

“It’s one thing to pull people in, but if you then end up putting people just like polka dots on the background of the hegemony of whiteness, what have you done?”

Looking ahead, Lashley’s work reinforces the need for more research and institutional inclusion to reflect the lived experiences of the studied communities rather than token representation.

“You have to look at the lived experience [….] If you go into a specific group, you have to create what it is you’re studying, the research, with that specific group,” she said. “We can no longer take a position of ‘I am the academic, I know everything, I am going to go and study, and then I am going to impose my results on you.’ That is very insulting. It’s inaccurate, it’s unethical, and it’s unhelpful.”

Overall, Lashley stressed the importance of doing inclusive research on mental health in Black youth. She teaches and spreads her expertise not to divide people, but rather to create an egalitarian society where all communities can access the mental health services they deserve without stigma.

“We’re not looking at what divides people [….] We want to know what the issues are. What is dividing people and using that information to pull everybody together [….] We want to create a world, a city, where everybody feels included, and everybody feels equal, and everybody is getting equity.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue