Latest News

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

“Kuso”: A film about bodily substances that has no substance

The magic of cinema lies in projected images’ power to profoundly move us. Everybody knows what it feels like to laugh at Ghostbusters (1984), or to cry at Marley & Me (2008). Kuso, the new film directed by the electronic musician Flying Lotus, demonstrates the power of movies to move us in a different way: That is, to gross us the fuck out.

Kuso prompted walkouts when it premiered at Sundance, along with awed reviews declaring it the “grossest movie ever made.” Even before it screened as part of FilmPOP (the film component of Pop Montreal), a Cinema du Parc employee gave a blunt warning: “This movie is really fucked up.”

Kuso is spectacularly, mercilessly disgusting—a film difficult to describe and even harder to watch. It is a journey into the darkest depths of the human subconscious. Unfortunately, in spite of the countless bodily substances smeared across the screen, the film itself lacks substance. Kuso engages neither the mind, nor the heart, but rather the gag reflex.

Imagine an  experimental conceptual short made by a hipster film student, then cross it with The Human Centipede (2009). This is Kuso. The plot, as far as can be ascertained, follows the aftermath of a devastating earthquake in Los Angeles—weaving together the stories of several survivors. In one scene, a boy befriends an alien creature in the woods—and then feeds it his excrement. At another point, a talking cockroach appears out of nowhere and declares, “Do not fear the feces.” It’s not a joke, but rather a necessary piece of advice, for it’s hard to overstate the sheer quantity of feces—along with pus, blood, and semen—in which the film is drenched throughout its 92 long minutes.

Alternating between jarringly indiscernible plot lines and confusing visual tangents, Kuso is a disorienting experience, creative if not cohesive. One highlight is the soundtrack, an ominous groove created by Flying Lotus himself, along with various artists including  Aphex Twin and Thundercat. The music gives the film an underlying consistency, which it otherwise lacks.

Occasional relief comes from the film’s perverse humor, and the best moments of Kuso are its funniest as well. When you laugh at a woman getting hit in the face with her own fetus, you’re also laughing at how quickly your own morals have degraded.

At times Kuso hints at aspirations of becoming something more than a gross-out flick, like in the segment of spoken word poetry referencing “21st-century power structures.” Yet the film teases such themes only to fall back into self-indulgent depravity. That’s a shame, because a post-quake Los Angeles would be a perfect setting for an allegorical look at American society, and the shock of Kuso would have been more powerful if there was something thought-provoking underlying it.

Instead, the film is primarily an experiment in just how far the moviegoer is willing to be pushed. “When will you walk out?” it seems to ask. When a cockroach emerges from the therapist’s anus? When a guy gets a blowjob from the talking boil on his girlfriend’s neck? Kuso makes you question your own limits, even if you don’t want to.

Kuso is a difficult experience to communicate. Just as the film’s earthquake bonds its survivors together, the film itself creates a special bond between anyone who sits through it. For better or for worse, it’s hard to forget.

Student Life, The Viewpoint

Viewpoint: Trying (and failing) to run my first marathon

Sometimes life gets busy and it becomes hard to focus on ourselves. I, for instance, tend to neglect my health when school and work get in the way, eventually leading me to short, impulsive, guilt-motivated spurts of fitness. In one of these moments this past summer, I talked myself into registering for Montreal’s Sept. 24 Rock N’ Roll marathon—two months, two weeks, and six days before the race. Having previously run a half-marathon, I felt well equipped to add another 13.1 miles in 11 weeks. Boy oh boy, was I wrong.  

I had my work cut out for me from the start. Not only had I not run seriously in a couple months, but I had also moved for the summer from sea-level Montreal to Crested Butte, Colorado, a city with an altitude of 8,909 feet. I was out of shape, and given the altitude, I could not run down a short driveway without a frightening amount of wheezing. Higher altitude air contains less oxygen, so transitioning to running in Crested Butte took a lot out of me during the first couple weeks. However, this effort meant that running in Montreal would be easy in comparison. I believed that if I could run in Colorado, I would surely be able to run the marathon in Montreal come September.

For many runners, marathon training is a long process that involves starting small and increasing one’s mileage each week. The ideal training time is four to five months, and I only gave myself two-and-a-half.  

My training began with alternating between running and walking for three miles until I could run three without stopping. This progression took two weeks, but soon thereafter, my internship took over and the 14-hour work shifts started to hinder my improvement. I knew what was happening: I had aimed too high, and I wasn’t taking the steps to keep myself on track. After weeks of ignoring training, I had forgotten all about my marathon registration. My passion and commitment had gone out the window. 

(Elli Slavitch / The McGill Tribune)

 

Beginning to feel foolish about registering for the marathon, I realized how much I’d overestimated the time I had available to invest in training. Every day that I didn’t run added to my feelings of guilt for under preparing myself. I knew that I was setting myself up for 26.2 miles of absolute pain. Avoiding my training was no way to indulge my pride. I thought about backing out of the race, registering for another one in 2018, and starting this year-long training process from scratch. Instead, I let my ego take over and decided to stick with the goal I had originally set.

Thus, I began another short, guilt-filled burst of training. Work was finally slowing down, so I was able to find more time to incorporate training programs into my daily schedule. I set aside an hour or two everyday to run for as long a distance as I could manage. With only a little over a month to go, I really had no choice.   

Once I got back to Montreal for the school year, my focus switched toward my social life, pushing the marathon to the back of my mind. My training took a full stop and instead, I filled up on beer at OAP with the rest of McGill. Before I knew it, I had not trained in over a week. My motivation levels were sinking fast.

As time in my half-hearted training schedule ran out, the subject line “Marathon is cancelled,” showed up in my email inbox. Officials made the call to cancel the race on Sept. 20—Montreal would face record high temperatures on the day of the race, therefore it would be unsafe to continue with the full marathon. So, on Sunday, Sept. 24, I slept in, avoided the heat, and thanked my lucky stars for not having to go through with my thoughtless decision.

From this tiresome venture, I’ve learned that beer is not fuel, running downhill is fun, and spontaneity pays its price. On a more serious note, however, this defeat taught me a lot about how I treat myself—by setting unrealistic goals and poorly-thought-out expectations, I just made matters worse for myself. I’ve come to realize that sometimes life is going to be unbalanced; maybe with more thought and time put into an appropriate training routine, I could return to my dreams of running a marathon. Though it sounds cliché, this applies to any endeavour: Setting your mind and prioritizing your goals, and knowing when to skip out on OAP to squeeze in a run, can lead to incredible outcomes.

From the BrainSTEM, Science & Technology

‘Westworld’ and the ethical dilemma of sentient machines

While deep in conversation with your childhood best friend, you catch glimpse of a frayed wire and grey hinge protruding from the side of their neck.

“I thought you knew,” they calmly remark at your gaze. Suddenly they swing the hinge open to reveal an intricate set of wires and flashing lights hiding behind what you thought was their face. “I’m synthetic, but I think and feel just as you do, so what difference does it make?”

What difference does it make?

Despite Facebook’s $7 million investment into a new artificial intelligence (AI) lab at McGill, AI is still far from matching human capabilities. Nonetheless, pop culture encourages viewers to ponder the controversy of the future of AI. HBO’s critically-acclaimed series, Westworld, explicitly wrestles with many of these same themes.

In the show, humanoid machines known as “hosts” are designed to entertain human customers in a life-sized, Western-themed, adult playground. The hosts are pre-programmed with memories and daily routines—convinced that their lives are as ‘real’ as any human’s. However, their memories reset daily, while guests—humans visiting the park—continue to use them for their own enjoyment.

As the show progresses, the line between hosts and guests blurs. Hosts begin to learn about their imprisonment and question their purpose. They are capable of everything the guests are, most notably the ability to suffer, which raises the question as to whether it is ethical to use the hosts as appliances for the guests’ pleasure.

Modern society grapples with the concept of equality among race, gender, and numerous other identity traits. Now, society must consider what ‘equality’ among those biologically created, and those engineered, means. As with most ethical questions, no answers are self-evident—but philosophy and cognitive science can help shed light on this dilemma.

An important insight comes from what Alan Turing coined the “Imitation Game”—now referred to as the “Turing Test.” Simply, if something can convince humans that it’s able to think, then they must assume it’s conscious.

A converse philosophical quandary, the “Problem of Other Minds,” highlights that an individual can never be certain that anyone else is thinking. Descartes’ “I think, therefore I am,” reassures said person that only they, themselves, can. Although humans believe that other humans are capable of thought because they’re similar, they can never be sure.

However, non-human animals also seem capable of thought, despite having brains that humans struggle to understand. With all of this in mind, if a machine with sensory receptors and a speaker system can maintain a conversation and respond to its environment, one must conclude that it’s conscious. Stevan Harnad, adjunct professor of psychology and cognitive science at McGill and the Université du Québec à Montréal, insists that composition of the cognizer is irrelevant.

“Why would anyone think that [controlling the AI] is any different than a human, because of the metal?” said Harnad.

He went on to assert that the current treatment of non-human beings, AI or otherwise, is more a matter of power than ethics.

Harnad also drew parallels between Westworld and the rodeos that just occurred for Montreal’s 375th anniversary. Bulls in the rodeo are used as a means to an end for human pleasure in the same way the show’s hosts are. Modern treatment of animals dates back to Descartes’ declaration of animals as “automatons”—devoid of feeling—as absurd as that may seem now. This sentiment creates a real-life Westworld in McGill’s own backyard.
History is filled with ethical failures that were only obvious in hindsight. The debate regarding how to treat non-human individuals isn’t a new one, but with the inevitable progress in AI, the time to discuss in thought experiments is shrinking. Conventional ethics assert that discrimination based on origin is unethical. AI demonstrates that human-like cognition can originate outside the realm of biology, and the treatment of animals shows how incoherent the valuation of non-human feeling can be.

If the question is a matter of flesh versus steel, and not consciousness versus unconsciousness, the answer is clear: There is no difference.

Features

Tank tops, hoodies, and bonus points

The two of us met the way many McGillians seem to: On a Saturday night in a poorly-lit bar, a pitcher of Sleeman between us. That evening, we had a conversation about our reservations concerning the various social events we had taken part in: Hype Week, Carnival, Science Games, and Faculty Olympics.

We both felt that these events generated an unhealthy social hierarchy, with the event organizers at the top like “party gods.” The events appeared to revolve around this group of people whom everyone, ourselves included, tried to please and impress. As trusting second years, we instantly felt compelled to befriend these older students and be liked by them. We acted this way despite the fact that they were not particularly approachable, not always helpful, or even people we necessarily liked. And yet we attended event after event, constantly trying to impress and outdo one another. Each event felt like a popularity contest on steroids.

At the time, we were embarrassed to speak so critically of these events, and to think that such hierarchies existed. What our conversation revealed was that the “VIP” culture we were trying so hard to adjust troubled us. Three years later, after finishing our undergraduate degrees and four consecutive years of fierce partying, we return to this conversation with a lot more to say.

McGill, News

New Assistant Professor Kelly Gordon introduces feminism to the McGill political science scene

As of Fall 2017, the newest addition to the McGill faculty is Assistant Professor Kelly Gordon, a proud feminist who is introducing McGill students in her class to the role of gender in politics. This is her first academic position, directly following the finalization of her of post-doctoral work at the University of Ottawa (UO).

In the Department of Political Science, where 26 of the 36 professors are male, Gordon focuses her research on conservative politics and the role that gender plays in political persuasion. Gordon believes the field of political science could benefit from a gender studies analysis it is currently lacking.

“It’s very difficult to understand contemporary politics without studying gender,” Gordon said. “[And] it’s very difficult to understand Donald Trump without understanding the role masculinity plays in politics [….Feminism] is more of a lens through which you see the world. It’s not a defined set of policies or ideas.”

Gordon completed her Masters of Arts in Political Studies and Feminist and Gender Studies at UO in 2010. She was inspired to pursue a career in academia after noticing the misconceptions surrounding conservative politics, especially the differences between East Coast Canadians’ perceptions of life in conservative Alberta and the reality. During her undergraduate degree, she never planned on becoming a professor.

“I had no idea that this was the route that I was even going to take,” Gordon said. “I think when I was doing my undergrad, I wasn’t really sure what a PhD even was.”

Gordon was originally inspired to focus on the role of gender in politics by her mother, who worked as an abortion provider. She also sought inspiration from a 1983 book called Right-Wing Women by Andrea Dworkin, which argues that the American political right mobilizes women by exploiting their fears.

“I disagree with most of [the book], but I think that it was a huge catalyst for me being interested in conservative politics as a feminist,” Gordon said. “Feminism is about economics [and] social, racial, legal injustice. Feminism is for everyone.”

Gordon applied her vision by working in a variety of areas within gender and politics. In 2015, she co-wrote a book with her thesis supervisor, Paul Saurette, titled The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement: The Rise of “Pro-Woman” Rhetoric in Canada and the United States.  In 2016, the work received the Donald Smiley Prize for best book relating to the study of government and politics in Canada. Yet, Gordon’s proudest achievement is sitting on a task force at UO in 2014 and 2015 that revised the university’s sexual assault and sexual violence policies.

“We undertook a big consultation with all the different stakeholders at the university,” Gordon said. “[I] got involved with being an advocate for survivors of sexual violence, and I think that’s something that I’m the most proud of that I’ve done.”

Currently, Gordon is teaching POLI 379: Topics in Canadian Politics and researching several independent pursuits such as the implications and motivations of victimization, conservative political persuasion, and the men’s rights movement in Canada. Gordon hopes to complete her works that are currently in progress—titled “Think About the Men!: Victimhood, Conservative Ideology, and Men’s Right Activism in Canada” and  “Gendering Political Persuasion: Sex Work, Bill c-36, and Discourse of Victimization in Canadian Conservatism”—during her time at McGill.

“I’m really just getting started,” Gordon said. “I really enjoy teaching. Until now, there really hasn’t been a gender and politics course offered within the political science department. My students are super excited about it, which makes me really excited about it.”

Laughing Matters, Opinion

True-Bro: The Prime Minister reflects on his student days at McGill

Justin Trudeau (B.A. ’94) recently made his return to McGill for the first time since becoming Prime Minister of Canada. As he exited the front doors of the Faculty Club, a rambunctious hoard of McGill students rushed to greet him. Trudeau proceeded to reminisce about his time as a McGill student, and how it helped shape him into the leader he is today.

Trudeau just wrapped up a meeting with the Fijian Prime Minister regarding trade agreements and tariffs. This is a topic that especially stimulates him, but what trumps the feeling of euphoria that he gets from a good handshake and photo-op are the memories he has from the 45th annual Carnival, where he admirably anchored his team, entitled “Cum Campbell,” to boat race victory just a few blocks away at Café Campus.

Suddenly, an RCMP officer on Trudeau’s detail acted like he had an important matter that needed addressing by the Prime Minister. Instead, after the officer yanked Trudeau aside, he presented a 330-ml bottle of Smirnoff Ice to him. Trudeau proceeded to get down on one knee as the crowd of students began to chant, “HERE’S TO JUSTIN, HERE’S TO JUSTIN…”

Trudeau tossed the bottle into the crowd, and continued taking selfies with the students, not wanting to pass up the opportunity to be visible in as many students’ Snapchat stories as possible and further inspire Canada’s future leaders.

At that point, Trudeau’s senior advisor, and fellow McGill alumnus, Gerald Butts (B.A. ’94, M.A. ’96), exited the Faculty Club to join Trudeau. Trudeau gave Butts a light tap on his butt, before winking at him and continuing on to a blacked-out van in a side alleyway. This version of blacking out is different from the one he was familiar with in his years at McGill.

Trudeau proceeded to get down on one knee as the crowd of students began to chant, “HERE’S TO JUSTIN, HERE’S TO JUSTIN…”

As the motorcade passed Upper Residence, Trudeau and “Gerry-Boy” [sic] debated the merits of approving the Kinder Morgan pipeline, in preparation for an interview he had later that day with the CBC. Trudeau and Butts owe their debating experience to their years on the McGill Debate Team. At this point, Trudeau pensively looked out the window—as if he were in a Celine Dion music video—and saw a picnic table just outside of Gardner Hall. This table reminded him of the many nights he and “G-Sauce” [sic] spent sharing a joint and arguing over whether or not a burrito can be classified as a sandwich. For the record, Justin was always in favour of the resolution that a burrito is, in fact, a sandwich.

The procession of government vehicles continued down University Street past the McConnell Engineering Building. The sight of the McConnell basement helped Trudeau recall stories about Julie Payette (B.Eng. ’86). Many people believe that Payette was named Governor General because of her extensive service to Canada as an astronaut, engineer, and businesswoman. And she was, of course, but the Prime Minister had one additional reason for appointing her to be the Queen’s representative—the insane stuff she used to get up to at Blues Pub. We’re talking ‘drinking beers out of a hard hat’ crazy—along with some other lore that cannot be discussed on these pages.

The Prime Minister looked around on that beautiful late summer afternoon at all the young faces of McGill students in both the mob that has gathered around his car, as well as on the rest of campus. He knew that they would all go on to do great things with their lives, leading the next generation of innovators in many different disciplines. However, the Prime Minister also hoped from the bottom of his heart that the students remember that their time at McGill is fleeting, so that they make the most of every second, form relationships over a beer or a joint (after July 1, 2018), and who knows—they might even meet their own future senior advisor or Governor General.

 

 

Isaac Berman is a U3 Computer Engineering Student. His childhood crush was Jane Goodall and his favourite pastime is filling out online resume forms for job applications.

@mcgilltribop | [email protected]

 

 

Student Life

Exploring loneliness within McGill’s nooks and crannies

Fear has an infinite number of personalities. Often times, the cliché examples come to mind, like phobia of spiders, snakes, or the dark. But there are fears that often go undiscussed, like the fear of being alone. It is a fear of living in isolation, of being devoid of the comfort that friends and family bring.

By psychological definition, and it’s no stranger to the millions of teens who move away from home for the first time to attend university; especially those who cross borders and oceans to get to McGill. The fear of loneliness hides in simple social activities that are often taken for granted, like sitting with friends at lunch, or knowing everyone in your classes. These things seem like a given until you realize that you’re eating your third meal alone that day, or that you haven’t left your room in well over five hours. Soon thereafter, the fear of loneliness sets in.

But not all students experience loneliness the same way; certain communities are more susceptible to this phenomenon, and the way it resonates with each is nuanced and varied.

The first year can feel like the hardest

One of the groups that loneliness most notably permeates is first years–and many freshmen try to counter their fears by trying to connect with as many people as possible. The result is often an overabundance of superficial acquaintanceships stemming from the same frivolous icebreaker questions heard everywhere on campus during the first week or two, such as “What are you majoring in?” and “What residence are you living in?” These questions barely skim the surface, testing the waters for potential connections that students are expected to make. There’s a race to build one’s network of friends and acquaintances—but resorting to superficial friendships can leave people feeling lonelier than they were initially.

“These [icebreaker] questions were really just conversation starters,” Isabella Lyons, U0 Arts, explained. “I only really remembered where people told me they were from because if we were both from the same place, it was something to bond over.”

For many, the struggle to maintain relationships often continues throughout university. In second year, when many students move off campus out of a student residence, they tend to lose the infrastructure of a communal space to help them socialize.

“In the first year, you’re mostly just looking for anybody that you can find to latch onto,” Matthew Foster, U2 Arts, said. “That’s why it’s a lot easier to make friends. But moving into the second year, you realize how easy it is to lose them. In the second year, I’d say it is more difficult to form friendships as well. You don’t have a lot of the same systems that put people [with similar interests as you] together.”

Transitioning from a dormitory is just one example of how new environments change patterns of socializing. For students from abroad, making an international–even intercontinental–move by themselves is not only daunting, it can be rather isolating.

International moves make for even harder transitions

For international students, finding a place on campus can be even more difficult. According to McGill Enrolment Services’ Admission profile, 32.1 per cent of the 6,467 students in the entering class of 2016-2017 were international students. Tackling cultural differences, dealing with homesickness, and building professional and social networks from scratch are just a few of the obstacles international students face.   

“When I [moved from India], I was all alone,” Ravdeep Singh Boparai said. “I had to deal with everything from a different study pattern to harsh winter. Culturally, with people coming from different cultures and regions here, some mix [with each other], some do not.”

As a non-native English speaker, Boparai initially found it difficult to navigate social circles on campus.

“Now, after six months, I am able to understand people more than I used to,” Boparai said. “But some people don’t understand me, and then avoid me, or the person with whom I’ll be talking will misunderstand me.”

Though McGill’s international aspect can make it difficult to find the right niche, student organizations and events offer hope in the midst of loneliness.

“I think joining clubs and taking part in extracurriculars is one of the biggest [ways to keep] a network of people of common interests,” Foster said. “There are always people who are looking for people like them. I admit, it becomes more difficult as you go on. But I think it’s also the nature of friendships, the ones that remain are [the] genuine [ones].”

Though loneliness strikes certain communities in different ways, it can become a nuisance no matter the time or place.

Laughing Matters, Opinion

The Old Colossus: A case for the removal of the Statue of Liberty

Lately, American cities have been removing statues that have been deemed no longer representative of the nation’s values. I, as an American, wholeheartedly support this trend. That said, I’m utterly shocked by some of the gross oversights that have occurred. Municipal governments have moved to take down Confederate monuments, which is all fine and dandy, but Americans have ignored the one piece of statuary that least embodies what America in 2017 stands for: The Statue of Liberty.

I’d like to be the first to suggest that we take the stupid lady down already. She won’t be missed. Freedom, liberty, and inalienable rights are bygone terms that have now been hijacked by radical liberals. Have you ever read the hogwash written on that thing? “Give me your tired”? Pfft. Lazy. “Your poor?” A bunch of freeloaders. “Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free?” There it is again, that blasted word “free.” We don’t want it. The freedom to come to America was thankfully reserved for my great-grandparents—so that their descendants could tell everyone else to bugger off. To suggest that the American dream means that anyone—regardless of their background—can succeed if they are willing to work hard, be a good citizen, and pay their taxes is preposterous. Cue the DACA repeal. Dear Lady Liberty, no thank you to the so-called “homeless, tempest-tost”—we only care about them if they’re in Houston anyway.

The real danger with the ethos embodied by the Statue of Liberty is that it gives everyone these ridiculous notions of equality and freedom. Take, for example, the U.S. military: There are currently transgender Americans who want to enlist in the armed forces, risking life and limb halfway across the world from their loved ones in the name of the U.S.A.. The audacity! When did we let this freedom thing ring so loudly? Clearly the wisest reaction to this wasn’t to embrace these people, who were willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for their country, but rather to ban them from serving in the military. God bless America.

Municipal governments have moved to take down Confederate monuments, which is all fine and dandy, but Americans have ignored the one piece of statuary that least embodies what America in 2017 stands for: The Statue of Liberty.

Take a moment and imagine what the Statue of Liberty symbolizes to some people. What if it included some rubbish about a country that holds freedom of speech above all else? What if Americans then believed that the truth should stand on its own and not have to be supported by the censorship of dissenting opinions? Just look in your own backyard. Environmental Protection Agency researchers running amok, indoctrinating American children into thinking that their beliefs must be held up by rigorous experiment. If we continue to let them speak freely, we will not be able to effectively stem the tide of climate change propaganda. People will begin to believe that the largest hurricane in the history of the Atlantic Ocean is more than a mere coincidence. It will be a total nightmare. Fortunately, that’s what gag orders are for.

The truth is, America sure as hell doesn’t want all the baggage that comes along with the Statue of Liberty. Immigrants? No thank you. Transgender equality? Not in my America. Freedom of speech and thought? Dangers to society.

So, there it is. That iconic slab of rubbish in New York Harbour doesn’t effectively personify American ideals anymore, and we have the policies to prove it. So, unless we can clean up our act, we better take it down.

 

Noah Fisher is a first-year student studying Political Science and Economics. He offers free haircuts to anyone willing to be a guinea pig.

 

 

 

Student Life

Freshman frustration: Breaking down the “best four years of your life”

Every September, almost 7,000 first-year students arrive at McGill and, after settling into residence and promptly ushering their families out of their dorms, eagerly dive into life’s next chapter. The expectation is that the next three or four years will be the best of their lives. But once the novelty of their new environment starts to diffuse, many McGill first years find themselves facing a gap between their prior expectations and the reality of university life.

A few days into their first year of university, students dive right into Frosh. The expectations established by Frosh leaders are that this will be the best week of their first year. Frosh certainly provides space to make friends and connections that will supposedly last a lifetime. Yet, for some students, this simply doesn’t happen, and it can be  hard not to worry that the rest of the year won’t amount to anything better.

For Carlyn Bujouves, U0 Arts, making friends during Frosh wasn’t as simple as she’d anticipated.

“[During Frosh], you go out with your Frosh group, but it’s hard to connect with other people by screaming, ‘Where are you from?’ over blasting music in a club,” Bujouves said. “I found I couldn’t really dig deeper to build more genuine friendships, and that people were acting in a way that would make them most appealing to others instead of being themselves.” 

The pressure to make friends right off the bat carries on long past Frosh. But with the party scene and almost a month of first semester behind them, many first years expect to have already found a close group of friends. Sarah Fairbrother, U0 Arts and Science, has found it difficult not to compare her own newfound friendships to the progress that others have made in making friends.

“I’ve met people I like and we hang out, but I haven’t found my ‘people’ just yet, and it can get lonely without a strong social circle,” Fairbrother said. “It seems like most other people have found their cliques. I think I just haven’t been putting myself out there enough.”

Depictions of university in pop culture and on social media as the best four years of one’s life tend to omit the challenges students often face during this time, leaving many first years feeling alone in their struggle. Constant comparisons among friends and acquaintances on social media can exacerbate this; a scroll through one’s Instagram and Facebook feeds perpetuates unrealistic expectations of what first year ‘should’ look like, only highlighting users’ success and happiness.

Being emotionally vulnerable under the pressure to appear perfect can be challenging. But for Chloé Laflamme, U4 Arts and Science, staying honest about hitting a low point helped her connect more deeply with others during her first year.

“After first semester, I was able to realize that I was partaking in certain behaviours for a lot of the wrong reasons,” Laflamme said. “I made my first genuine friend when I hit a very low point, and they showed me compassion and support in response [….So I] tried not to shy away from opening up and being authentic.”

For Laflamme, building such close friendships took time. There were no instant connections, no best-friends-forever right off the bat. Yet, years later, Laflamme remains close with those first-year friends who got her through the toughest parts. 

“I lived with friends from rez all throughout undergrad,” Laflamme said. “My main social circles can be traced back to who I met in first year.” 

The personal growth that occurs over the course of university is not linear—it is filled with ups and downs. While the time frame for adjusting to university life varies on an individual basis—the imperfections are as much a part of it as the sublimity of it all. 

Ask a Scientist, Science & Technology

Where did these butterflies come from and where are they off to?

As summer transitions into fall, an increased flow of insect and bird migrations takes off. The McGill campus, as well as greater Montreal, has experienced a southbound butterfly migration in preparation for the winter. Although these butterflies are commonly misidentified as monarchs, they are actually Vanessa cardui, or Painted Ladies.

Insect expert and Curator of the Lyman Entomological Museum Stephanie Boucher pointed out that this misidentification is common.

“Most people know the monarch [butterfly] very well, [since the] monarch has a lot of publicity and attractivity [surrounding it],” Boucher said. “They are both orange, but they have big differences; Painted Ladies have a mosaic of brown, [while] the monarch [has a] darker central body. The Painted Lady [also has] a much smaller wing width. [However, they] are both migratory species [with similar] unique life patterns.”

Different weather and temperature patterns can affect the life cycles and migration habits of many insects, in both good and bad ways.

Vinko Culjak Mathieu, graduate student in ecology at McGill, noted that “migration, [and other life events] are impacted by various factors [such as] daily temperature, moisture, light, etc.”

Warmer winters lead to early snowmelt, and, subsequently, early flowering. This occurrence is unfavourable because it is out-of-sync with the arrival of the butterflies.

“[When] temperatures [are] high, migration happens earlier, and [the butterflies may] get to [their destination] without food or other available resources,” Mathieu said.

However, this summer, the butterflies had a successful mating season.

“[The butterflies] had [access to] a lot of water and [flowers in the south],” Boucher articulated. “[For that reason], they were better able to reproduce when they came up north.”  This year brought favourable environmental conditions from Quebec to Mexico.

Yet, observing the direct effects of rising temperatures on migration patterns proves challenging. Both Mathieu and Boucher agree that trends, instead of singular effects, require observation.

Boucher explained that changes in climate can affect the migratory patterns of the butterflies.

“[The butterflies would] be affected because they would not be able to [return back] to the same site,” Boucher said. “[Overall], migratory species will be affected in different ways and will eventually adapt [to climate changes] slowly, [however] studies would need to be made, to see how their overwintering sites will be affected.”

Butterflies may be abundant this year, but the appearance of orange Painted Ladies in Montreal isn’t totally unique.

“It [may] seem like an exceptional year, but it has been seen before 2012 and in 1973 there were [also] large migrations,” Boucher said. “The environmental conditions at the wintering site [were] good for them, [and so] they came up north in a larger population than before.”

Another reason why we are seeing so many Painted Ladies on their journey south is the result of strong high-altitude winds.

“[Painted Ladies usually] migrate south 300 to 400 metres above the ground,” Mathieu added, “[but] strong winds force them to stay low. They [are also taking] advantage of the warmer weather to collect more nectar to continue their migration journey.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue