Latest News

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Netflix announces new production of “A Series of Unfortunate Events”

Netflix recently released a preview for a new upcoming series: A Series of Unfortunate Events. Now that it’s confirmed as part of the Netflix family, the  surprisingy mature children’s series seems to be coming back into the public eye.

The original book series, written by Daniel Handler under the pseudonym Lemony Snicket and illustrated by Brett Helquist, centres on the orphaned Baudelaire siblings (Violet, Klaus, and Sunny) as they seek safety after the tragic deaths of their parents. However, Count Olaf–a villain who stalks the children to steal their fortune–constantly thwarts their attempts and the children pass through the hands of several horrible guardians, who each meet grim ends at the hands of the Count. 

The series is witty, dark, charismatic, and filled with a litany of historical and literary references. The prose of the series is neatly polished and Handler masterfully alludes to mature themes with surreal elements that echo Edward Gorey or Tim Burton’s gothic and whimsical fantasies. 

In the first few books, the adult characters in the series are almost entirely corrupt. In response, the Baudelaires idealize their deceased parents and transform them into allegorical figures of home and safety. As the series progresses, the children realize that their parents were not entirely guiltless or greedless. In fact, they may have  initiated the series of unfortunate events when they organized the murder of Count Olaf’s parents. 

Count Olaf, in the later novels, becomes an increasingly tragic figure caught in a cycle of revenge. As the children mature, their experiences complicate their understanding of the world as a binary of good and evil. They realize that no one, not even themselves, is completely morally sound. Only once they make this realization do the children become self-subsisting and independent.

Netflix isn’t the first to adapt the stories to the screen. The 2004 film, Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events, heightened the comedic elements of the series, most notably by casting Jim Carrey as Count Olaf. The dark tale plays out well on the screen; Thomas Newman’s haunting score and the cast, which included Emily Browning, Meryl Streep, and Billy Connolly add gravitas to an otherwise light-hearted film. However, the movie only adapts the first three novels and as a result fails to touch on the fact that the crux of the siblings’ maturity comes not when they leave their guardians, but when they realize that their parents were not without flaws.

The books hinge upon the question of what it means to be a child transitioning to adulthood, especially without parents. The Baudelaires never stop loving their parents; they do, though, stop relying on their memory as a guidepost and learn to make their way through life without them. The series represents the children coming to terms with the death of their parental figures and moral guides, and the path toward independence. Hopefully the Netflix production, with its increased screen time, will flesh out these themes where the film did not.

It is too early to discern whether or not the Netflix series will attempt to follow in the 2004 film’s footsteps or whether it will attempt to grapple with the darker topics that the books confront. The series will star Neil Patrick Harris as Count Olaf. Harris is known for his comedic chops from his work in How I Met Your Mother and Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog. Undoubtedly, the series requires comedic and absurd tones in order to be successful—however, the extent to which  Netflix will address the more sobering themes that the novels contain remains to be seen.

 

A Series of Unfortunate Events will premiere on Netflix on Jan. 13 2017. 

McGill, News

Study Saturday Parents and Kids Program now held in SSMU building

On Nov. 19, the Post-Graduate Students’ Society of McGill (PGSS) held its first Study Saturday Parents and Kids Program (SSPKP) event of the 2016-2017 school year. The free service allows student parents to drop their children off with volunteer babysitters for up to five hours, assisting parents to study on the weekend.  

In an email to The McGill Tribune, PGSS Member Services Officer Jenny Ann Pura explained that the McGill Office of Religious and Spiritual Life (MORSL) initiated the program in 2004. When MORSL no longer had the funds to support Study Sunday in 2014, PGSS took over the project. Although PGSS is the SSPKP’s main organizer, parents pursuing an undergraduate degree are also free to use the program.

“The objective of the program is to provide student parents with an opportunity for quiet study time and is designed to better serve the McGill community,” Pura said.

Pura confirmed that PGSS has teamed up with the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) to move the program from Thomson House to the SSMU building.

“In its evolution, a collaboration was set out by the previous [2015-16] executives of PGSS and SSMU, and only now have the kinks been ironed out,” Pura said. “The plan is to collaborate with Midnight Kitchen to provide the snacks and food.”

SSMU Vice-President (VP) Student Life Elaine Patterson said that PGSS struggled to accommodate parents at Thomson House in past years.   

“Thomson House […] isn’t the easiest place to get to,” Patterson said. “[PGSS] reached out to SSMU last year to start hosting this program in the SSMU building. We’ve been working on integrating it more in SSMU and offering it to members of SSMU and PGSS alike. It’s a program that we can now offer to any student parent on campus.”

This Fall marks the second semester that PhD candidate in Educational Studies Haleh Raissadat will use SSPKP to catch up on schoolwork.

“If [the program] happened in the summer, I would definitely be here,” Raissadat said. “I have a little kid and I work full-time. Basically, my only chance to study would be during the night after 10:00 p.m. when I put my kid to bed until 6:00 a.m. The program gave me a chance to study at normal hours and make sure that I’m not putting my child in front of the T.V. all day.”

Educational Studies PhD candidate Constantinos Yanniris noted that with daycare centres closed on weekends, student parents have little time to dedicate to their studies.

“It’s very important for us to find somewhere that, even for once a month, we have this place where we can study,” Yanniris said. “Our weekends are full. For graduate students, there aren’t really holidays and so we really appreciate [the program], especially since we don’t see any other services like this for parents from the McGill administration.”

SSMU and PGSS are currently accepting volunteer applications for the six remaining Study Saturday events. During this academic year, sessions will be held until April 22, 2017.

Behind the Bench, Combat Sports, Sports

MMA vs Boxing: The rise of the ants

“Elephants don’t beef with ants. An elephant is so large it doesn’t even see ants,” commented boxer Floyd “Money” Mayweather Jr. on a potential fight with mixed martial arts (MMA) star Conor McGregor. Although an argument could be made that boxing was bigger than MMA 10 years ago, Mayweather Jr.’s analogy doesn’t hold water in 2016.

Once seen as the pinnacle of combat sports, boxing has lost its lustre since Mayweather left the ring last year. The sports’ success was largely predicated on the star power of its fighters. Millions of fans tuned in to watch household names like Muhammad Ali, Sugar Ray Leonard, Mike Tyson, and, of course, Floyd Mayweather Jr. Although there are still great boxers around, none have the gravitas Mayweather and his predecessors did. Only a chosen few can afford to treat the sport as a spectacle as much as a fight.

Of those few, Mayweather Jr. was certainly one. He kept the sport alive by defying the status-quo and people hated him for it. After beating Oscar De La Hoya in 2007, he gained so much notoriety that all of his fights were considered the ‘Super Bowl of Boxing.’ Since his lacklustre fight against Manny Pacquiao and his retirement, boxing viewership has declined dramatically.

Conversely, MMA has recently seen a dramatic increase in popularity, leading many to wonder if it can potentially replace boxing as the most popular combat sport in the world. Some experts argue that the surge of superstars like McGregor could make it the case. Loudmouthed, talented, and extravagant, the Irish fighter’s rags-to-riches story is one of legends. Now, as MMA’s most marketable asset, he is striving to conquer disciplines outside of the Octagon. After his victory over Eddie Alvarez on Nov. 12, 2016 in Madison Square Garden, he insulted MMA executives, claiming he deserves a bigger stake in the company for all his accomplishments.

In the latest development, McGregor made it clear that he is eager to make a dream fight against Mayweather Jr. a reality, but under one condition: He wants $100 million in order to fight under boxing regulations. If both parties agree, this fight would become the most lucrative event in boxing and MMA history.

Although a Mayweather Jr.-McGregor fight is unlikely, it could have a much bigger implication than just financial gain. Simply put, it could alter the fates of the fighters’ respective sports. If Mayweather Jr. were to lose, it would severely damage boxing’s reputation and could increase the value of the MMA. 

McGregor has reached a point in his career where transitioning to boxing is conceivable. Not only that, McGregor’s camp reached out to renowned boxing coach Freddie Roach to start training him for a potential switch. This shows that he is serious about the fight, but also that he will need a lot of adjustments to be able to compete with Mayweather Jr., the greatest defensive boxer of all time.

In fact, the shift from mixed martial arts to boxing could prove to be a difficult endeavour. Contrary to its reputation as a brutish, uncivilized sport, boxing is a science that requires a high level of technique and skill. One has to be more than a fit brawler to compete–let alone win–in boxing.

If this fight doesn’t come to fruition, it’ll be up to the next generation of fighters to not only win, but do so with flamboyance and charisma–a feat that only a chosen few have been able to accomplish.

Hockey, Men's Varsity, Sports

Patrik Laine’s strong start to season has Jets hopeful for playoffs

Twenty-four years ago, Teemu “The Finnish Flash” Selanne set a record for goals scored (76) and points earned (132) by a rookie in his debut season for the original Winnipeg Jets during the 1992-1993 season. The Jets appear to have once again found a young Finnish sensation in 19-year-old rookie Patrik Laine.

The Finland-native currently leads the league in goals with 12, including a pair of hat tricks and five powerplay goals. After scoring a goal in his opening game against the Chicago Blackhawks, Laine has continued to impress and with 18 points in 21 games—the rookie is on pace to score 70 points this season. Along with teammate Mark Scheifele, who is tied for the league lead in points, Laine is part of a dangerous first line that has been responsible for most of Winnipeg’s offence this season.

The Jets currently sit in third place in the Central Division–arguably the toughest in the NHL–and have clearly improved on last season. Since Patrik Laine’s arrival the Jets are now in 16th place in the NHL and hold the 21st-best powerplay; though not stellar, it is a marked improvement over 25th place and the worst powerplay last season. Laine has played a significant part in the revival of the Jet’s powerplay. With a lethal shot, he is usually placed at the blue line and has become a weapon that has generated more scoring chances for the Jets power play, accounting for 45 per cent of its goals.

Laine will need to continue at this pace for the rest of the season if the Jets want to make the playoffs—a tall task for a first-year player. While he had been scoring at a prolific rate, Laine needs to work on his defensive game, as he currently holds a plus-minus of -1, erasing his gains on offense. Early indications suggest that Laine have every opportunity to excel—he currently averages 19 minutes of playing time per game. The Jets needed a player who could have an immediate impact and so far they have gotten what they wished for. 

Laine’s success in the NHL should not come as a total surprise. Prior to his NHL career Laine was named most valuable player of the 2016 IIHF World Championships. Going up against NHL players, he finished with 12 points in 10 games, second most in World Championships history for an U19 player at the World Championships, behind only Sidney Crosby. He also led the tournament in scoring with seven goals. 

It is unsurprising that before the NHL draft, Laine believed he should be the first pick. His season has justified his confidence—he has outplayed the first overall pick Auston Matthews, who sits five points behind Laine.

Jets fans are hoping to see the second incarnation of “The Finnish Flash” lead them to the playoffs. So far, Laine has answered the call. Winnipeg appear to be on the right path and Laine looks like he can be the face of the future for the Jets.

Hockey, Men's Varsity, Sports

McGill Redmen hockey dominates Brock Badgers in penalty-filled contest

After a contentious first period, the McGill Redmen (10-2-1) exploded with three goals during the second and finished the game with a 6-1 victory over the visiting Brock Badgers (7-5-1) on Nov. 19.

Close opening periods have been the norm for McGill this season. A slew of powerplays in the second period shifted the momentum to the Redmen and allowed them to get three goals on the board.

“The more the game goes on, we get our legs back and the execution gets better,” McGill defenceman Dominic Talbot-Tassi said. “Then the powerplay gets us the momentum and we get going, then they can’t keep up with us.”

While the powerplays did generate scoring opportunities, numerous turnovers and penalties put severe strain on the Redmen penalty-kill unit. This allowed Brock to slide a goal past a worn-down Redmen penalt-kill team.

“Especially when you have the same guys going over the boards, it might take a toll,” Redmen defenceman Nathan Chiarlitti said. “But at the end of the day, we’re a team and we play as one group. If some guys need to contribute more one game, then that’s fine.”

The struggle of the first period was followed by the Badgers’ attempts to throw the Redmen off their game by starting fights. As McGill continued to pull away with a wide lead, multiple ejections ensued in the second and third periods as instances of roughing and fighting erupted in the corners. Brock racked up more ejections and penalty minutes from these aggressions than McGill and the resulting penalties only expanded the five-goal lead that the Redmen held to the end of the game.

“Late in the game like that, when we’re up 6-1, they’re going to try and do stuff like that to get our guys out of the game,” Redmen Assistant Coach David Urquhart said. “We knew the other team was going to be a little chippy and our guys did a good job of defending themselves.”

The Redmen will face UOIT and Queen’s on Nov. 25 and 26, respectively. Having lost to UOIT earlier in the season, the team feels ready for a re-match.

“That was one of the games we had a slow start, so that’s going to be one of the focuses for that,” Urquhart said. “We’ve grown a lot since then, and we’ve been developing an identity since then, so this is a good chance for retribution for that game.”

 

Stat Corner: 158 penalty minutes were racked up during the game with 130 of those minutes coming from the third period alone.

 

Quotable: “It’ll be revenge for us.” — McGill defencemen Dominic Talbot-Tassi on the upcoming game against UOIT

 

Moment of the Game: Two back-to-back goals by the Redmen, the first from the slot by Dominic Talbot-Tassi and the second by Nathan Chiarlitti, brought about the mid-game surge in goals that established McGill’s lead and accelerated the pace of the game.

McGill, News

Students rally at “Love Trumps Hate” protest at McGill

On Nov. 14, students participated in a protest organized by Democrats Abroad at McGill following Donald Trump’s victory in the American presidential election on Nov. 8. In Fall 2016, American students made up 11.3 per cent of the undergraduate entering class and 6.8 per cent of the graduate entering class.

The protest started around 5 p.m. at Milton Gates. Participants engaged in speeches denouncing the policies promoted by President-Elect Trump and calling for society at large to take action. The crowd then peacefully marched to the Roddick Gates. Protestors had prepared posters with slogans such as “Love Trumps Hate” and “Respect existence or expect resistance,” as well as posters of the Palestinian flag and gay pride flags.  

Vice President (VP) Events of Democrats Abroad at McGill Ella Hanson explained that the event aimed to provide a space for all students to voice their thoughts and opinions after the U.S. elections.

“I think we saw a lot of protests happen around the U.S. and we wanted to give American students and also international students at McGill the opportunity to express their opinions about the results in the election,” Hanson said.

Thomas Chroeter, a German-American U1 Arts student present at the protest, believes it is important to participate in such events in order to prevent Trump’s re-election in 2020.

“The one thing that we can do in order to not let something like this happen again is to go in the communities, speak to people, […] to join groups like Democrats Abroad at McGill, and to make sure that at the next elections we know that we fought our hardest, that we did our very best in the next four years to not give Trump a second term,”  Chroeter said.

Chroeter recalled feeling deeply discouraged and disoriented when the election results were announced.

“I was feeling lost, I didn't know what to do,” Chroeter said. “It was probably one of the worst nights of my life.”

Beatrice Dimaculangan, U1 Arts, an American student also present at the protest, had an emotional experience on election night and in the following days.

“As I was watching the election, I was actually in a room full of international students where there was a lot of Americans and everyone was in tears,” Dimaculangan said. “I was in tears the next morning, […] I had friends hitting me up that were scared for their lives, for their futures.”

Dimaculangan feels particularly threatened by Trump’s program and policies due to a triple vulnerability.

“I am a woman, I am a minority, I come from a family of immigrants, so right now I’m feeling very fearful and anxious for my future,” Dimaculangan said.

Despite the apprehension, Dimaculangan remains optimistic about the future impact of her generation, who largely voted for Hillary Clinton.

“As a group of millennials we are […] incredibly vocal about our opinions and very optimistic about the impact that we can make […] because if you do look at the distribution of votes for millennials, […] it’s predominantly blue,” Dimaculangan said.  

Amanda Demers, president of Democrats Abroad, explained that due to the elections, participation in the organization’s events has significantly increased this year.

“This year has been, obviously, the most active year […],” Demers said. “There’s been a big sense of concern and worry for a lot of Americans, especially being abroad, because you feel like you can’t do as much […] so we’re trying to provide them with outlets so they can become involved.”

Democrats Abroad intends to organize more events of this type if students’ urge to protest maintains the intensity manifested last week. However, nothing is planned yet.

“We hope [that] if the interest is still there and, depending on what happens, […] we will definitely be organizing more events,” Hanson said.

News, PGSS

PGSS Council stands with AMUSE in negotiations

On Nov. 16, the Post-Graduate Students’ Society (PGSS) legislative council discussed a motion supporting the Association of McGill University Supports Employees (AMUSE) collective bargaining. The council also addressed questions to Provost and Vice-Principal (VP Academic) Christopher Manfredi and discussed security measures that were to be taken at the Nov. 19 Masquerade Ball.

PGSS Support for AMUSE

AMUSE, a labour union that represents casual and temporary workers at McGill, is currently engaged in the bargaining process for a new collective agreement for its workers. The union’s bargaining concerns include hiring priority for jobs workers have done before, raising the minimum wage to $15.38, and a better work-study posting system.

AMUSE held a five-day strike from Oct. 29 to Nov. 2 after the McGill administration refused to make concessions. Maxim Baru, AMUSE communications and outreach officer, explained that steps are still being taken to move forward with the collective bargaining agreement.

“We are back at negotiations right now,” Baru said. “Unfortunately, the university has not been sufficiently moved to change their position on any substantive issue. We are continuing negotiations and considering all options moving forward.”

When asked if AMUSE will hold a second strike, Baru said that plans are not currently in place.

“Right now there are no plans for a second strike though the strike mandate is still in effect,” Baru said. “We are keeping all options open. If we go on another strike, there will be ample time given to all members.”

The motion for PGSS to support AMUSE in its collective bargaining process passed unanimously.

Provost to Council

Provost Manfredi held a question and answer discussion with the Council. When asked if students should expect tuition changes for out-of-province, exchange, international, and graduate students, Manfredi explained that all tuition rates, except for international undergraduate students in select disciplines such as Science and Management, are set by the province.

“We don’t get to decide what rates will be for our students,” Provost Manfredi said. “That is the same for graduate students as well. Tuition is allowed to rise by the disposable family income in Quebec, which is about 1 per cent per year.”

Provost Manfredi also spoke of some of the campus sustainability ideas that were brought up at the Nov. 10 joint board-senate meeting.

“We were grouped in three different sets of tables: Short term, medium term, and long term,” Manfredi said. “Our long term table came up with how we should set a date by which McGill should be carbon neutral and develop an action plan to get there.”

Further discussion included how McGill can incorporate sustainability into curriculum and introduce travel policies that aim to cut down the carbon footprint of faculty and students.

Masquerade Ball

PGSS held a masquerade ball for its members on Nov. 19 at Thomson House. In response to the accessibility of Thomson House and recent reports of sexual assault and harassment against students near McTavish Street and Dr. Penfield Avenue, PGSS will take measures to keep students safe during the event. Currently, Thomson House is not accessible from McTavish Street due to construction. All pedestrian traffic has been directed to Peel Street.

According to Mina Anadolu, PGSS Internal Affairs officer, students will be provided with a card that lists phone numbers to campus safety services. Walksafe, McGill Student Emergency Response Team (M-SERT), and Peer Support Centre will be stationed at the event.

“We will be increasing lighting and will alert McGill security about the event,” Anadolu said. “Currently, McTavish is closed, so we’re trying to utilize Peel to keep [students] safe.”

McGill University Arts Building
Off the Board, Opinion

A plea to disgruntled Americans at McGill

It has taken quite a lot of time for me to process what this election means for myself and for my country. I have felt everything from sadness to anger to fear to nausea. The most qualified presidential candidate in the history of our nation was defeated by a man with no experience who ran on a platform of hate and fear. At first I was embarrassed to be American. The House and Senate remain majority Republican, and the next Supreme Court Justice will be nominated by a man who has promised to overturn Roe v Wade. This may feel like the end of days, but I promise you it is not. It is essential that we American students at McGill mobilize politically if we are dissatisfied with the result of this election.

If this election has taught Americans anything, it’s that we need to stick together and stand up for our marginalized communities, including immigrants, the poor, ethnic minorities, and women. They are the ones most at risk in Donald Trump’s America, and many can’t afford or don't have access to the resources to leave the country. When you feel tempted to apply for a visa and move to Canada, or you hear friends and family discuss leaving, even jokingly, remind them that leaving does not end the effect of the Republican takeover at home. Donald Trump has already recruited Myron Ebell, a climate change denier, to help transition the Environmental Protection Agency; promised to repeal the Affordable Care Act; and deport 800,000 undocumented workers who came to our country as children and were set on a path to citizenship by Barack Obama. By leaving, you will be abandoning those most vulnerable to the after-effects of an election that we are all ultimately responsible for. Living under a Donald Trump presidency and Republican majority government may be difficult, but there are millions for whom it will be much more difficult.

Racism, sexism, xenophobia, and violence may have defined this election but they do not have to define the United States or its people. We can give ourselves time to mourn, to process the world that has suddenly turned upside down. But, soon, we must begin to put the pieces back together. Donald Trump did not win the popular vote; it is okay to feel that he is not your president. What it is not okay is to give up.

We must not let this momentum die. It is now our responsibility to get involved politically—however possible. We are the ones who will be living with the ramifications of this decision for the coming decades. You can start from Canada. If you have not already, get involved in Democrats Abroad at McGill. Start applying for government internships, use your summers to mobilize, phone bank, and fundraise for organizations that are fighting against conservative legislation.

Then, go home. It is time to fight against the fear and hatred Trump ran on, and show the members of society who he has insulted, threatened, and scapegoated—Latinos, Muslims, those with disabilities and the LGBTQ+ community—that they are still an important and valued part of American society. Pay attention to and vote in midterm elections. Get involved in your local politics: No level is too small. Volunteer for organizations that are fighting the good fight—environmental groups, gun control activists, and abortion rights protectors such as Planned Parenthood.                                     

This is not the end. This election does not mean it’s time to give up on our democratic institutions. This was not a failure of democracy—in fact, it was an example of our democratic institutions performing as they were designed. However, democracy’s success does not mean that everyone has to be satisfied with the results of an election. We can be using these same institutions to fight for the changes we were hoping to see before Trump was elected. It is time to politically mobilize, to put our time and money where our mouths are, and to start making a difference. Democrats gained seats in the House and the Senate; Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. Our country has the potential and the desire to do better and be better, but it is going to take all of us to make our inclusive, optimistic vision of America a reality. Our world may have been changed on Nov. 8, but it doesn’t have to be for the worse.

Legal Information Column, Student Life

An overview of immigrating to Canada as a student

Unexpected news. This was what kept students glued to TVs and computer screens on Nov. 8, despite upcoming midterms looming in the background. After a week to digest the election results, what’s inevitably come up among U.S. citizens, even if jokingly, has been the topic of immigrating to Canada. Of course, it may also be the magic of the Montreal Canadiens or this city’s affordable rent that invites students to settle down here. Whatever the reason, below are just some of the ways a foreign national can extend their stay in Quebec, either temporarily or permanently.

A temporary permit for a worker or a student staying in Quebec is called a certificate of acceptance (CAQ). Foreign nationals studying at McGill most likely hold a CAQ for studies. With a CAQ, a foreign national may apply to extend their studies, to obtain a work permit, or to obtain permanent residency.

How may a person extend their period of study?

If a person wishes to extend or change their level of studies beyond the expiry date of their current CAQ, they must file a new application for a CAQ for studies. This may be done online or by mail. It is recommended by many universities to do this several months preceding the expiration of the current study permit.

How to obtain a post-diploma work permit?

If a person wishes to extend their stay after receiving their diploma, they may apply to Citizenship and Immigration Canada for an open work permit. This is called the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program (PGWPP). A person must already have a study permit and have continuously studied full-time for at least eight months before applying for a work permit. A person must apply within 90 days of receiving notice from their educational institution indicating that they have satisfied all the requirements for obtaining the diploma. Also, an applicant who doesn’t meet full-time status in their final academic semester, but is otherwise eligible, may still apply. Note that this type of permit is only valid for a maximum of three years. However, the permit cannot exceed the length of the program of study of the student. For example, if the academic program lasted two years, the work permit will also only last two years. 

This application can be filed online through the Citizenship and Immigration Canada website.

How to obtain permanent residency in Quebec?

There’s a difference between the selection and the admission of permanent residents. The Quebec provincial government retains sole authority in the selection of permanent residents destined for their province. Being “selected” by the Quebec government means that the province wants the applicant to stay in the country; however, the province doesn’t have the authority to allow someone to stay—that is to say, the Quebec government cannot issue permanent residency visas. The Canadian federal government is responsible for the admission of permanent residents and therefore is the authority that will issue the visa. So, to apply for permanent residency, a person must first apply to the Quebec provincial government for a selection certificate (CSQ), and then submit an application for permanent residence to Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

Applying for a CSQ

A foreign national who is either studying or working temporarily in Quebec and who wishes to settle permanently in the province must apply for a CSQ under the category of what is called a “skilled worker.” This application must be submitted while the person is still staying in Quebec.

Someone holding a study or work permit may apply for a CSQ through the Quebec experience program (PEQ)—an accelerated program to obtain a CSQ. However, the criteria are more onerous than through the regular selection program for skilled workers. Someone not eligible to apply through the PEQ may still apply for a CSQ through the regular program.

Qualifying for the PEQ

Like Quebec experience program name suggests, one criteria for acceptance is that the applicant must have the intention of settling and working in Quebec. As the program promotes successful integration into the province, the government will also require the applicant to promise to provide for their needs as well as the needs of their immediate family for at least the first three months after acceptance. Furthermore, the applicant needs to show advanced intermediate knowledge of oral French. Finally, the applicant needs to have respected all the conditions of their current work or study permit. 

Depending on whether the PEQ applicant is currently holding a work or study permit, there are other conditions. For example, a PEQ applicant with a study permit must have a diploma or expect to complete their study program within six months of submitting their PEQ application. In any case, the application needs to be submitted no later than 36 months after the program of study has ended. For someone with a work permit who wishes to apply for the PEQ, they need to have held a job for 12 months over the last two years before the PEQ application. In addition, they must currently be working a job at the time of their application.

Applying for permanent residency

Once a person has obtained a CSQ, they may apply to Citizenship and Immigration Canada to become a permanent resident as a skilled worker selected by the provincial government of Quebec.

Even though Quebec has selected the candidate, Citizenship and Immigration Canada still has the right to refuse to issue a selection certificate. The application might be refused if Citizenship and Immigration Canada believes that the applicant does not actually intend to settle in Quebec. 

It’s important to note that immigration law is complicated, and decisions depend on the discretion of the official reviewing the file; requirements thus vary case-by-case. Moreover, there may be other eligibility concerns. For immigration advice, please contact a lawyer. Taking the time early on to learn about the law may be beneficial when everybody is scrambling to stay on the north side of the border (or wall). 


To inquire further about these processes, or to ask your own legal question, contact the Legal Information Clinic at McGill (LICM) with the directions found on our website. According to the Act respecting the Barreau du Québec, only lawyers and notaries can provide legal advice or counsel. The LICM, therefore, only provides legal information. For legal advice, please contact a lawyer. 

Commentary, Opinion

Why isn’t mental health the top priority at McGill?

On Oct. 24, the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) hosted a Q&A panel to address questions regarding the state of mental health at McGill. Only 16 students attended the panel out of a population of over 39,000. Whether the low attendance rate was due to the stress of midterms season or a lack of knowledge about the event, it is clear that mental health and related policy is not the main priority for many students. This is a symptom of the university’s culture, which places more emphasis on academic rigour than on the well-being of its students. 

As a student in the university, this is troubling. Mental health problems should not be an expected part of the McGill experience. It is the institution’s role to mitigate and prevent factors that may contribute to psychological issues of its students. 

Mental health issues are characterized by the Public Health Agency of Canada as “alterations in thinking, mood or behaviour (or some combination thereof) associated with significant distress and impaired functioning.” A 2014 McGill report on data from the 2012 and 2014 Counselling and Mental Health Benchmark Study revealed that McGill students reported higher academic distress and depression in comparison to American benchmarks. This report also indicated high levels of anxiety amongst students and a perceived lack of social support from the community and peers.

In response to the growing psychological problems on campus, McGill has developed several initiatives, including an online McGill Mental Health Hub, as well as student-initiated events like the Mental Health Awareness Week. In addition, McGill Counselling and Mental Health Services (MCMHS) has recently implemented the “stepped-care” model. However, as was reiterated by speakers at the Q&A panel, these clinics do not have an adequate number of professionals nor the space to address the needs of every student.  

The reality is that no matter how many resources are available, academic distress plays a large role in students’ lives. This is a symptom of the campus’ culture of excellence. To be clear, McGill’s problem is not its high-achieving character. McGill attracts many of its students because of its academic excellence; the workload is understandably demanding. The academic demands and stressful environment become problematic when students prioritize their grades and work over their mental wellness. Often, mental health only becomes a concern after students have reached a tipping point of psychological distress. 

McGill must focus on preventing mental health issues from arising in the first place. To do so, there must be systemic change that involves shifting McGill’s framework to prioritize the wellbeing of its students over its academic achievements. As McGill’s report indicates, when campuses prioritize mental and physical wellness, students learn better and are more satisfied and engaged. 

Ideally, specialized mental health prevention training should happen within faculties to create a more centralized culture of mental wellness, which makes self-care an essential component of students’ academic experiences. For example, McGill’s Schulich School of Music has a mandatory mental health training and mentorship plan, prompted by the high levels of anxiety and stress in the faculty itself. This initiative enrolls incoming students in a compulsory class in music professional development, which provides comprehensive training in mental and physical wellness. The program also matches new students with mentors and provides access to a music student well-being hub

Yet, a large population of McGill students are in the Arts, Science, Engineering, and Management faculties. These departments also foster competitive environments, but do not have specialized mental health programs to directly address the issues. In the Faculty of Arts, professors often run through the course curriculum and academic demands, only to bring up mental health as a side note and remind students that they should not hesitate to seek out student services. After that slight briefing, class resumes, and mental health is once again placed on the back-burner. 

McGill is making strides to provide better mental health services and awareness, but there is room for improvement in terms of prevention and integration of services at the faculty level. If the poor attendance at the Q&A panel is any indication, there must be a stronger shift towards addressing the pervasive presence of mental health issues on campus. For McGill, that requires recognizing that the well-being of students is the primary concern. 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue